分类: politics

  • ‘ALL OF US OR NONE OF US!’ Social Partners draw line on Cabinet meeting over BTL-Smart deal

    ‘ALL OF US OR NONE OF US!’ Social Partners draw line on Cabinet meeting over BTL-Smart deal

    A growing procedural standoff has emerged around Belize’s controversial proposed acquisition of Speednet Communications by Belize Telemedia Limited (BTL), after the nation’s four primary Social Partner groups rejected a government invitation that excluded two of their members from an upcoming Cabinet discussion.

    The Belizean government initially extended invitations only to the Belize Chamber of Commerce and Industry (BCCI) and the National Trade Union Congress of Belize (NTUCB) for a scheduled Cabinet meeting on August 13 to discuss the $80 million acquisition deal. Speednet, the target of the proposed buyout, operates the popular SMART telecommunications brand, a major competitor to state-linked BTL in Belize’s domestic telecom market.

    In response to the selective invitation, all four Social Partner organizations — which also include the Belize Network of Non-Governmental Organizations (BNN) and the National Evangelical Association of Belize (NEAB) — released a joint statement reaffirming their longstanding collective approach to reviewing the controversial acquisition. The group made clear that any meeting with Cabinet must include official representation from all four entities, framing the stance with the principle of “all of us or none of us.”

    Crucially, the coalition has not refused to engage with government leaders entirely. Instead, the groups have set two non-negotiable conditions for their participation: full collective representation at the table, and the release of key documentation that the coalition requested weeks earlier but has yet to receive. Among the outstanding materials are audited financial statements for both companies and independent third-party valuation reports for the proposed $80 million transaction. The Social Partners also emphasized that they will require a reasonable window to review the requested materials thoroughly before any formal discussions with Cabinet can take place.

    The coalition also noted that it welcomes the Public Utilities Commission’s willingness to open additional dialogue on the deal, but pointed to the formal requests outlined in their August 6 statement as the foundation for any future stakeholder engagement with the regulator.

    Twenty-four hours after the joint position was released, the BCCI issued a separate public clarification to address growing public speculation that the chamber had outright rejected the August 13 meeting invitation. The organization explained that both its president and chief executive officer had pre-existing long-term commitments as part of an official Belizean trade delegation traveling to El Salvador, which will remain out of the country through August 14. The delegation includes both public and private sector representatives, and is in El Salvador to sign the new Belize-El Salvador Partial Scope Agreement, a trade deal designed to strengthen bilateral commercial ties and open new market opportunities for Belizean businesses.

    The BCCI emphasized that it had only requested the August 13 meeting be rescheduled, and rejected all claims that the request reflected an unwillingness to engage with Cabinet on the acquisition. The chamber confirmed it remains fully committed to holding comprehensive consultations with government leaders, and maintains that productive dialogue can be held before Cabinet issues a final decision on the deal. It added that it stands ready to meet alongside the other three Social Partner groups for Cabinet’s next scheduled deliberation on the acquisition on August 18, at a time that works for all parties.

    The BCCI’s separate clarification aligns closely with the collective position the coalition released a day earlier: all four groups are willing to negotiate with Cabinet, but only when they can attend as a unified bloc and have time to review the critical transaction information they have requested.

    The current procedural impasse sits within a much larger national controversy over BTL’s planned acquisition of its largest private sector competitor. BTL has publicly defended the deal on commercial grounds, arguing that it holds substantial excess capacity on its existing national telecom network. The company claims absorbing Speednet’s roughly 100,000 subscribers would allow it to eliminate redundant infrastructure and cut unnecessary operating costs, benefits that it argues could be passed on to consumers.

    By contrast, the Social Partner coalition has centered its scrutiny on a series of pressing public interest concerns, including risks to long-term market competition, lack of transparency around the deal terms, gaps in governance, and insufficient regulatory oversight of the proposed transaction. In an update Wednesday, the BCCI confirmed that none of these substantive concerns have been resolved, and the coalition continues to push for full, detailed responses to each of their questions. For now, however, the immediate deadlock centers on a simpler question: who will earn a seat at the Cabinet table, and will the Social Partners get the information and review time they are demanding before the government moves forward with a final decision on the acquisition.

  • Unions Mobilize Against BTL-SMART Deal

    Unions Mobilize Against BTL-SMART Deal

    A growing wave of organized labor opposition to state-owned Belize Telemedia Limited’s planned takeover of Speednet Communications Limited, which operates under the brand name SMART, is set to translate into public demonstrations, escalating a months-long debate over the future of Belize’s telecommunications sector. The National Trade Union Congress of Belize (NTUCB), the country’s umbrella union body, has organized two coordinated actions to push back against the acquisition: a nationwide show of solidarity scheduled for Friday, August 14, where supporters are asked to wear black, followed by a large-scale public rally and demonstration on Tuesday, August 18.

    The shift to public protest marks a clear escalation of union pushback, moving the conversation from private negotiations and public calls for greater government transparency to open collective action. As of press time, the NTUCB had not released an official public statement confirming the demonstration, but internal correspondence from one of the country’s largest unions confirms its members will participate in the peaceful gathering. The Belize National Teachers’ Union (BNTU), an NTUCB affiliate, shared an August 12 memorandum addressed to administrators at all government and grant-aided educational institutions across Belize, confirming that its teachers will join the protest, alongside other affiliated unions. The memo, signed by BNTU National President Nadia Martin Caliz, notes that participating teachers will be unable to attend pre-scheduled professional development sessions on the day of the demonstration, and closes with the firm rallying cry: “We Shall NOT be Moved.”

    Multiple sources close to the NTUCB confirm that the body held a closed-door planning meeting on August 11, where a resolution opposing the acquisition was introduced and passed unanimously by attending delegates. No official public statement outlining the meeting’s outcomes had been issued to media as of press time.

    The growing labor opposition comes after a key union reversed its earlier position on the deal. The Belize Communications Workers Union (BCWU), which represents all workers at BTL and previously backed the acquisition earlier this year, announced in an August 10 statement that 84 percent of its voting membership now opposes the transaction in its current form. The reversal followed an emergency membership meeting held on August 6, where members revisited the union’s stance after core concerns remained unaddressed by BTL and government officials.

    Earlier this year, after a January 22 virtual town hall with BTL leadership, a majority of BCWU members signaled support for the acquisition, but that approval was explicitly conditional on the union’s outstanding concerns being resolved. Those unresolved demands include guarantees for job security for existing BTL employees, full transparency around the financial costs and long-term economic implications of the merger, clarification of procurement and regulatory approval processes, open governance and public disclosure of deal terms, confirmation of whether SMART employees would be eligible for BCWU membership, and a commitment to a phased acquisition process that includes ongoing consultation with the NTUCB. To date, none of these demands have been met to the satisfaction of union leadership.

    In a public post to its official social media channels, the NTUCB called on all workers, union members, and concerned Belizean citizens to join the August 14 black-out solidarity action. “This is about more than two companies,” the post read. “It is about workers, consumers, competition, investment, and the future of telecommunications in Belize. Let us show that Belizeans are paying attention and that our voices matter when decisions are being made that affect our economy, our workers, and our country.”

  • Cabinet Rejects Proposed BTL-SMART Acquisition

    Cabinet Rejects Proposed BTL-SMART Acquisition

    BELIZE CITY – In a sudden and high-stakes policy decision released on August 13, 2026, Belize’s Cabinet has formally rejected a planned acquisition of SMART/Speednet by state-majority-owned telecom firm Belize Telemedia Limited (BTL), a move that comes directly in response to widespread organized labor pushback against the proposed merger.

    The official notice, distributed via a press statement immediately after the Cabinet’s closed-door deliberation, confirmed that the nation’s top governing body has withheld its approval for the controversial takeover. “After careful deliberation, it is Cabinet’s informed position that it does not support the proposed acquisition,” the statement read.

    As the release made clear, the Government of Belize, the Belize Social Security Board, and the general public of Belize hold a controlling majority stake in BTL. Given this public ownership structure, Cabinet officials emphasized that they bear a non-negotiable responsibility to conduct a rigorous, responsible review of all available data and stakeholder input before greenlighting any major industry transaction.

    The government’s reversal of the proposed acquisition comes on the heels of growing labor unrest that was set to culminate in a mass public demonstration next week. The Belize National Teachers Union (BNTU) had recently confirmed it would join the National Trade Union Congress of Belize (NTUCB) in the planned protest, scheduled to take place on August 18 in the nation’s capital. BNTU President Nadia Caliz had publicly called on union members to mobilize against the deal, framing the protest not just as a fight against the acquisition, but as a critical test of whether the government prioritizes public interests over private corporate gains.

    Industry analysts note that the blocked merger marks a significant win for organized labor in Belize, and sets a clear precedent for how major public-private sector transactions will be evaluated moving forward, especially when they impact key public infrastructure and consumer interests.

  • Regering legt eerste voorstel voor looncorrectie ambtenaren op tafel

    Regering legt eerste voorstel voor looncorrectie ambtenaren op tafel

    On August 13, formal negotiations over wage corrections and additional compensation for civil servants and equivalent public sector workers entered a new, more intensive phase at the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Suriname, after the government tabled its first formal proposal to union representatives. While the proposal marks a key milestone in ongoing discussions over public sector pay, no final agreement has been reached yet, with both sides set to continue intensive talks in the coming weeks to bridge gaps between competing priorities.

    High-level government officials led the discussions on the state’s side, including Marinus Bee, Minister of Internal Affairs; Adelien Wijnerman, Minister of Finance and Planning; and Raj Jadnanansing, Deputy Minister of Public Health, Welfare and Labor. The government’s negotiation body, chaired by Delano Landvreugd, also participated in the talks, alongside union representatives from two of the country’s largest labor federations, Ravaksur and CLO.

    The core goal of the negotiations is to improve the income position of public sector employees, a longstanding demand from labor groups. In structuring its opening proposal, the government has emphasized that it must balance this demand against the country’s existing public financial constraints. No details have been released to the public regarding the specific content or total scope of the government’s initial offer, to preserve the integrity of closed-door negotiations.

    Following the government’s presentation, union representatives put forward their own set of demands, priorities, and counter-proposals, all of which will be taken into account as talks move forward. Moving ahead, upcoming negotiation sessions will focus on reconciling two core competing priorities: the public sector workforce’s widespread call for meaningful income improvements, and the limited fiscal and economic space available to the government to implement new spending measures.

    Minister Bee stressed in a statement following the first session that the negotiation process remains ongoing and far from concluded. He confirmed that talks will continue at an accelerated pace in the coming period, with the shared end goal of reaching a consensus on a final package of wage adjustment and compensation measures that works for both the government and public sector employees.

  • The Green Machine is Activating Against Proposed BTL-SMART Acquisition

    The Green Machine is Activating Against Proposed BTL-SMART Acquisition

    In a move that amplifies growing public opposition to a controversial corporate takeover, the Belize National Teachers Union (BNTU) has pledged its full organizational backing for a mass demonstration scheduled for next Tuesday, August 18, 2026, opposing the proposed acquisition of Speednet (SMART) by Belize Telemedia Limited (BTL).

    BNTU President Nadia Caliz has issued a direct call to all union-affiliated teachers across the country to join the public protest, urging educators to make their widespread dissatisfaction with the proposed deal visible to national leaders and decision-makers. Caliz confirmed that the union’s decision to join the demonstration aligns with an official directive issued by the National Trade Union Congress of Belize (NTUCB), which has called on all of its affiliated labor organizations and their thousands of members to participate in the coordinated action.

    Caliz positioned the upcoming protest as a critical defining moment that will reveal which interests the nation’s government ultimately prioritizes. “The assets of this country belong to us, the Belizean people,” Caliz stated in her address to union members. “Our elected officials are only temporary custodians of the public good. That means every major decision they make must serve the best interests of all Belizeans, not the narrow gains of a small privileged minority.”

    She went on to frame the demonstration as a rare opportunity for ordinary voters to reassert their authority over elected representatives. “If you want real change, if you want to show our elected leaders that they hold office to serve us, not their own private interests, this is our moment to make that clear,” Caliz added. “Change never comes if we stay silent and do nothing.”

    In an official memo distributed to education stakeholders this past Wednesday, the BNTU formally notified partners that its members would be unable to participate in previously scheduled professional development activities set for August 18, as educators will instead join the national protest. Caliz closed by reaffirming the core message of the labor movement’s action: “It is critical that our national leaders pay close attention to what is happening here. They all hold power only because the people of Belize voted them into office, and they must answer to the public that put them there.”

    The planned demonstration marks one of the most significant coordinated labor actions in Belize in recent years, bringing together multiple unions across sectors to challenge a major corporate and policy decision that opponents argue runs counter to national public interest.

  • PM on official visit to State of Qatar

    PM on official visit to State of Qatar

    Grenada’s top executive is set to embark on a key international diplomatic mission next year, with Prime Minister Dickon Mitchell leading a high-powered government delegation on a multi-stop tour that will include working engagements in Spain before moving on to an official visit to the State of Qatar from August 13 to 19, 2026.

    During his time in Doha, the prime minister is scheduled to hold a packed slate of closed-door and public high-level meetings with Qatari cabinet ministers, senior national government representatives, and leading stakeholders from both the public and private sectors. Accompanying Mitchell on the overseas mission are Finance Minister Dennis Cornwall, Grenadian Ambassador Andrea St Bernard, senior official Damian Dolland, and Consul General Ziya Rahaman. To ensure steady governance throughout the prime minister’s absence, Deputy Prime Minister Lennox Andrews will serve as acting head of government until Mitchell’s scheduled return to Grenada on August 19.

    This planned diplomatic trip marks a deliberate step forward in Grenada’s long-term strategy to deepen its global footprint and expand its network of international partnerships. According to an official statement released by the Office of the Prime Minister, the tour aligns with the country’s priority to build stronger strategic cooperation with both Spain and Qatar across sectors critical to advancing Grenada’s core national development targets.

    Discussions between the Grenadian delegation and their Qatari hosts will center on seven key priority areas. First, participants will address critical funding support for Project Polaris, one of Grenada’s key national development initiatives. Second, the two sides will explore expanded bilateral cooperation on energy issues, spanning both renewable energy development and collaboration on hydrocarbon resources. Third, leaders will talk through opportunities to deepen partnership in the social sectors, including sports exchange programs and joint education initiatives. Fourth, the delegations will work to align coordination and voting priorities for shared engagement within multilateral global institutions. Fifth, the visit will advance plans for expanded people-to-people diplomatic exchanges and targeted government capacity-building programs. Finally, both sides will discuss pathways to stimulate private sector growth and unlock new cross-border investment cooperation between the two countries.

    This announcement of the upcoming visit confirms Grenada’s ongoing push to diversify its international alliances and secure new resources and partnerships to drive inclusive, sustainable domestic growth, as the island nation works toward its long-term development objectives.

  • Ghana President John Mahama commends UWI during milestone visit

    Ghana President John Mahama commends UWI during milestone visit

    On August 3, the University of the West Indies (The UWI) opened its doors to Ghanaian President John Dramani Mahama for a landmark visit that cements the deepening ties between African and Caribbean nations in the global fight for reparatory justice for the crimes of chattel slavery and native colonial genocide. The trip coincided with Jamaica’s 64th celebration of its independence from colonial rule, creating a powerful symbolic moment to highlight The UWI’s decades-long legacy of leading reparations advocacy, academic inquiry, and Pan-African development progress.

    Per an official press statement from the university, The UWI hosted the Ghanaian head of state at its Regional Headquarters to honor the collective work of the global reparations movement and broader Pan-African organizing initiatives. For more than half a century, the regional higher education institution has stood at the forefront of shaping the modern reparations campaign, driving progress through rigorous academic research, public outreach and education, grassroots advocacy, and evidence-based policy design. It has been widely credited by global stakeholders with transforming reparatory justice from a once-marginalized cause into a central topic of regional and international diplomatic discourse.

    During his address on campus, President Mahama delivered high praise for The UWI’s unwavering leadership in the global movement, singling out the university’s Centre for Reparation Research. The center has grown into a preeminent global hub that coordinates cutting-edge research, develops global policy frameworks, and leads public education efforts around the demand for reparatory justice. Mahama also spotlighted the critical work of The UWI Vice-Chancellor Professor Sir Hilary Beckles, who has guided the Caribbean Community (CARICOM)’s unified reparations strategy, noting that the global community is increasingly turning its attention to the need for formal recognition, legal accountability, and tangible redress for the historical atrocities of transatlantic chattel slavery and the genocide of Indigenous peoples under colonial rule.

    The visit carried unique personal and institutional meaning, beyond the diplomatic agenda. President Mahama is an alumnus of the University of Ghana, a sister institution that shares deep historic roots with The UWI. Both universities were established in 1948, and for 75 years have aligned around a shared mission of expanding educational access, fostering intellectual growth, and advancing self-determination for populations emerging from centuries of colonial domination.

    Welcoming President Mahama to the regional headquarters, Vice-Chancellor Beckles commended the Ghanaian leader’s outstanding work advancing the reparations cause on the global stage, particularly through his advocacy at the United Nations. “President Mahama has provided courageous and visionary leadership in elevating the cause of reparatory justice within the global community,” Beckles said in his remarks. “His efforts have helped secure unprecedented levels of international support for recognising chattel slavery as the gravest crime against humanity and have strengthened cooperation among nations committed to justice, development and human dignity.”

    Beckles added that recent diplomatic progress at the United Nations signals a critical shift in global public awareness and political commitment to the cause. He noted this shift reflects growing solidarity among CARICOM member states, the African Union, and aligned nations across Latin America and Asia that share a commitment to redressing historical colonial harm. Describing Mahama as “a presidential leader of the movement,” Beckles emphasized that coordinated collaboration between African and Caribbean political leaders is foundational to advancing the shared global agenda for reparatory justice. He also recognized the critical work of Barbados Prime Minister Mia Amor Mottley, who chairs CARICOM’s Prime Ministerial Sub-Committee on Reparations, for her ongoing efforts to build broad international support for the movement.

    University officials noted that the visit further solidifies The UWI’s unique role as a living intellectual and institutional bridge connecting Africa and the Caribbean, positioning the institution as a leading contributor to global conversations on historical justice, human rights, and equitable sustainable development. As international attention on reparatory justice continues to rise at an unprecedented pace, The UWI reaffirmed its longstanding commitment to advancing the movement through independent research, inclusive global dialogue, and evidence-based policy that centers the needs of Caribbean communities and the broader African diaspora.

  • When will Saint Lucia get a North-South link road?

    When will Saint Lucia get a North-South link road?

    For over 20 years, the proposal for a North-South Link Road has circulated among policymakers and communities in Saint Lucia, conceived to resolve one of the island nation’s most persistent transportation challenges: creating a reliable, efficient travel corridor between the northern and southern ends of the island that bypasses the heavily congested capital city of Castries.

    Despite decades of discussion and planning, however, the ambitious infrastructure project has yet to move past the conceptual phase. As Infrastructure Minister Shawn Edward confirmed in an exclusive interview with St. Lucia Times on the sidelines of a Parliament session Tuesday, the project remains in early stages even as it has been elevated to a top government priority, drawing new interest from private firms eager to explore development and financing options.

    First formally evaluated in 2001, the North-South Link Road idea gained broader public and policy attention over the subsequent 10 years, with the Caribbean Development Bank once funding a comprehensive feasibility study to map potential routes and analyze the project’s viability. The planned corridor would run along Saint Lucia’s northeastern coast, connecting the northern town of Gros Islet directly to the southern community of Dennery, eliminating the need for all north-south traffic to cut through the capital’s crowded urban streets.

    Edward framed the project as a response to a long-recognized critical need for improved interregional connectivity on the island. If completed, officials project it would become one of the largest public capital infrastructure projects ever undertaken by the Saint Lucian government, delivering a wide range of projected benefits: reduced average travel times between the island’s two ends, eased traffic congestion within Castries, unlocked new economic development opportunities across the underdeveloped northeastern coast, and provided a critical alternative evacuation and travel route if existing primary roads are disabled by hurricanes, landslides or other natural disasters common to the Caribbean.

    Still, converting the decades-old concept into a paved highway has faced significant, long-standing barriers. Earlier feasibility assessments concluded that construction costs would be prohibitively high for the island nation, while environmental advocates raised serious concerns over the potential ecological damage the northeastern route could cause, as it would pass through several ecologically sensitive coastal and inland areas.

    Edward’s recent comments signal a renewed push from the current administration to re-examine the project, after multiple previous iterations stalled out over the past two decades. To date, the government has received interest from several private entities, with the minister confirming he has held direct meetings with representatives from four to five firms, alongside formal correspondence from additional groups partnered with local Saint Lucian business interests.

    For now, the project remains anchored at the concept stage, with its future trajectory hinging entirely on two core factors: securing a viable financing structure that addresses the project’s historic cost challenges, and selecting a development proposal that aligns with the government’s priorities. Edward emphasized that the North-South Link Road holds a spot on his ministry’s and the current government’s official priority list, and he expects to release a far more concrete update on the project’s path forward, including details on financing frameworks, within the next few months. When pressed on whether Saint Lucians can expect tangible construction progress during the current government’s term, Edward declined to commit to a firm timeline, noting that additional assessments and negotiations will be required before any definitive commitments can be made.

  • Diario Libre says JCE response leaves key questions about Spain trip unanswered

    Diario Libre says JCE response leaves key questions about Spain trip unanswered

    Transparency concerns have emerged around a 2025 official cybersecurity training trip taken by two senior members of the Dominican Republic’s Central Electoral Board (JCE) to Spain, after local newspaper Diario Libre revealed that the agency’s official response to public inquiries failed to refute key spending details, while leaving critical questions about costs, trip duration and policy compliance unanswered.

    In a detailed response sent to the outlet, the JCE defended its mandate to carry out international professional activities and emphasized the growing critical importance of strengthening cybersecurity for electoral institutions. However, Diario Libre’s review of the response confirms the JCE did not challenge core reported facts: JCE board members Hirayda Fernández and Samir Chami Isa traveled to the Spanish city of León between July 12 and 26, 2025, and each received $12,000 in per diem payments, calculated at a daily rate of $800.

    When combined with round-trip airfare for the two officials, the total public cost of the trip amounts to $33,294.27, according to the newspaper’s accounting.

    A key point of contention raised by Diario Libre is the mismatch between the length of the trip and the duration of the training itself. The Cybersecurity Summer BootCamp the officials attended only ran from July 14 to 24, totaling roughly 40 hours of structured instruction. This 11-day training window leaves two extra days on the front end and two days on the back end of the 15-day trip unaccounted for, leading the outlet to question what official electoral business justifies collecting per diem for the full 15-day period.

    The JCE has stated that it maintains full documentation of the trip’s itinerary, duration, travel arrangements and administrative justifications, and Diario Libre acknowledges that releasing these records to the public would be the clearest path to resolving outstanding questions. So far, however, the agency has not made these materials public.

    A second unresolved issue centers on the JCE’s per diem policy itself. The agency cites Act 18/2005 as the legal basis that authorizes the $800 daily per diem rate for its board members, but Diario Libre reports that it has been unable to locate a public version of this legislation. The outlet is now calling on the JCE to publish the full text of the act, along with the official per diem rate schedule and any amendments that have been made to the policy since it was enacted.

    Additional clarifications the newspaper has requested include a breakdown of what expenses the $800 daily payment is intended to cover – which typically includes accommodation, meals, local transit and incidentals in standard public per diem policies – as well as whether the JCE requires officials to return any unused per diem funds to public coffers.

    While Diario Libre says it accepts the JCE’s position that international professional development and cybersecurity training are legitimate priorities for electoral management bodies, the outlet maintains that the inherent value of such work does not remove the obligation for public entities to account for how taxpayer money is spent, nor to demonstrate that spending is efficient and aligned with stated institutional goals.

    In its conclusion, the newspaper stresses that the core of the dispute is not whether international travel or cybersecurity training is a justifiable use of public resources. Instead, the issue at hand is whether public funds are managed with full transparency, and whether every official trip can demonstrate clear, measurable benefits for the electoral institution that authorized it.

    At present, Diario Libre is urging the JCE to meet public demand for accountability by publishing all relevant trip documentation, outlining its per diem policy in full, providing a detailed breakdown of all activities carried out by the two officials during their 15-day stay in Spain, and sharing the specific tangible outcomes the trip delivered for the JCE.

  • Cuba condemns Dominican Republic’s expulsion of Cuban diplomats

    Cuba condemns Dominican Republic’s expulsion of Cuban diplomats

    In a sharp rebuke of a recent unilateral move by the Dominican Republic, Cuba’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has issued a forceful condemnation of the decision to expel nine Cuban diplomatic officials alongside their immediate family members, insisting the action lacks any legitimate or factual justification.

    Havana has pushed back firmly against any implication of misconduct by its diplomatic corps, emphasizing that all Cuban representatives stationed in the Dominican Republic have consistently adhered to the standards outlined in the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. The Cuban government further confirmed that its envoys have always fully respected the domestic legal framework of the Dominican Republic, leaving no grounds for the expulsion order.

    According to Cuban officials, the hostile measure is not an independent decision by Santo Domingo, but rather the direct result of sustained pressure from the United States, part of Washington’s long-running campaign to diplomatically isolate Cuba on the global stage. The Cuban government pointed to two recent precedents that underscore the Dominican Republic’s shifting alignment with U.S. policy toward Havana: first, the Dominican Republic’s choice to bar Cuban representatives from the postponed Summit of the Americas, and second, its reversal of position on a United Nations resolution backed by Cuba that calls for an end to the U.S. trade embargo against the island nation.

    While Cuba acknowledged that the expulsions carry the potential to inflict severe, long-lasting damage to formal bilateral relations between the two Caribbean nations, it also stressed that the step will not sever the deep-rooted, historic connections that bind the Cuban and Dominican peoples. In its official statement, the Cuban government highlighted the shared cultural heritage, intertwined historical experiences, long-standing economic ties, and history of mutual solidarity that connect the two populations, noting these bonds run far deeper than current diplomatic tensions.

    “The Dominican people can always count on the unwavering friendship and solidarity of the Cuban people,” the statement concluded.