分类: politics

  • Pintard defends lottery plan; calls Davis ‘architect of gimmicks’

    Pintard defends lottery plan; calls Davis ‘architect of gimmicks’

    With just 28 days remaining until the Bahamas’ critical general election, the Free National Movement (FNM) held its first major campaign rally on New Providence, where party leader Michael Pintard launched a fiery defense of his controversial proposed national lottery, directly pushing back against scathing criticism from sitting Prime Minister Philip Brave Davis.

    Held at Golden Gates Park under the campaign theme “Fire Forward,” the event drew an energized crowd of FNM supporters, who packed the venue dressed in official party gear, waving party flags, chanting and dancing as the slate of party candidates took the stage. Signature FNM anthems, from “Simply the Best” to “Keep the Fire Burning,” played throughout the night, building a festive, high-stakes campaign atmosphere. The rally wrapped with a traditional Junkanoo rush-out after a closing prayer, leaving attendees buzzing with momentum ahead of the upcoming vote.

    In his keynote address – delivered after a dramatic torch-lit procession entrance accompanied by police escort – Pintard pushed back hard against Davis’ recent dismissal of the lottery plan as a cynical “gimmick” rooted in electoral desperation. The FNM leader accused the prime minister of outright hypocrisy, arguing that Davis’ label is far more fitting for the incumbent administration’s own policy practices.

    Pintard hit out at the government’s handling of public funds, declaring, “The prime minister [is] the chief architect of gimmicks. They started talking about slash funds and if you look in the dictionary next to slash funds, you will see the picture of the prime minister.”

    Outlining the core guardrails of his proposal, Pintard emphasized that the FNM’s national lottery would operate under strict regulatory oversight from an independent governing board, designed to explicitly insulate revenue from political misallocation and interference. He noted that unregulated gambling is already widespread across the Bahamas, arguing that formalizing the sector would allow the government to redirect currently untapped funds toward tangible public benefits for Bahamian citizens.

    To back the plan, Pintard pointed to existing national lottery models in countries including the Dominican Republic, Curaçao, St Martin and Ghana, explaining that the Bahamian framework would allow the state lottery to coexist with existing private gaming operators while directing all proceeds toward public initiatives. These would range from small business grants for aspiring entrepreneurs, to financial support for students pursuing post-secondary education both at home and abroad, to investments in cultural development and environmental protection.

    Questioning the incumbent government’s opposition, Pintard noted, “it was them who gave birth to the regularizing of gaming. Why would it be a problem for them all of a sudden to have a national lottery where the bulk of those resources are being administered to the government system?”

    Davis had struck back at the proposal just days earlier, questioning both its intent and the international examples Pintard cited. The prime minister called the plan a headline-grabbing stunt rooted in political desperation, arguing that the Dominican Republic’s national lottery – the example Pintard highlighted – has been marred by widespread corruption and mismanagement. Davis claimed the proposal amounted to a poorly thought out plan to create a slush fund for corrupt actors.

    Beyond the lottery debate, Pintard used his keynote to address broader hot-button issues including national sovereignty and immigration, holding up a Bahamian passport as a core symbol of national pride and birthright. He affirmed that all individuals who obtain Bahamian documentation through legal channels – regardless of their country of origin – are welcome members of the Bahamian community, but blasted the incumbent administration for failing to crack down on rampant fraud involving identity documents like passports and voter ID cards.

    Pintard accused the government of targeting critics who raise alarms about document fraud, saying, “if you’re not outraged by the frequency with which fraudulent passports, voters cards are being used in this country, if you are not angry about that, then you must be an accomplice in it happening.” He also pledged that if the FNM wins the election, a new administration would immediately launch a full audit of incumbent government finances to track public spending and root out mismanagement, declaring “we’re going to open the books.”

    The rally marked the FNM’s second major campaign event, and featured remarks from the party’s full slate of New Providence candidates, including Pinewood hopeful Denari Rolle, Golden Gates candidate Michael Foulkes, Garden Hills candidate Rick Fox, Bamboo Town candidate Dr. Duane Sands, Carmichael candidate Arinthia Komolafe and South Beach candidate Darren Henfield. Each candidate used their platform to criticize the ruling Progressive Liberal Party, pointing to what they described as a lack of tangible progress across their constituencies. FNM Deputy Leader Shanendon Cartwright, who is contesting the newly created St. James constituency, introduced Pintard and offered brief remarks on immigration and public spending ahead of the keynote.

  • Gov’t contemplates ‘COVID’ style measures amid rising oil prices — Vaz

    Gov’t contemplates ‘COVID’ style measures amid rising oil prices — Vaz

    KINGSTON, Jamaica — Jamaica is grappling with a growing crisis driven by skyrocketing international oil prices spurred by ongoing Middle East geopolitical instability, and Energy Minister Daryl Vaz has issued an urgent call for collective responsibility among all Jamaicans to cut energy use, while warning that the government could soon implement targeted movement restrictions to curb fuel consumption.

    Vaz outlined the government’s multi-pronged response to the economic fallout from Middle East tensions during a post-Cabinet press briefing held Wednesday morning, making clear that further price hikes are inevitable as long as the regional conflict continues.

    “You’re gonna see increases as long as this conflict in the Middle East continues. We [the Government] will do what we can do, but it is important that you do what you need to do to understand that you need to conserve starting today, today, today,” the minister stressed repeatedly, emphasizing the urgency of immediate action.

    Among the policy options under active consideration by the government is a return to COVID-era hybrid work-from-home arrangements, a measure that would cut down on commuting traffic and overall transportation fuel use. Vaz noted that final approval for any new conservation policies will rest with the full Cabinet, but argued that change is unavoidable given current patterns of travel.

    “The Government is gonna have to look at policies to limit movements, especially transportation movements. I don’t know whether or not we go back to a COVID-hybrid version of working from home; something has to happen, because the level of traffic that I am seeing on the road doesn’t show me that anybody realises that there’s a war and the price of fuel/oil is going to go up, and up, and up,” Vaz said.

    He added that while the government will finalize formal conservation plans following Cabinet deliberations, individual and community action is non-negotiable amid the unprecedented global price crunch. “it is 100 per cent the responsibility of every Jamaican to realise that we are in a major, major crisis as it relates to the price of oil internationally, and therefore, you need to take responsibility for your household, your business, [so] see what you can do,” he stated.

    Even as the government confronts soaring costs, Vaz moved quickly to reassure the public that Jamaica’s energy security remains solid. Long-term finished product supply contracts and domestic refining capacity operated by state-owned oil firm Petrojam have kept supply chains stable, meaning there is no risk of fuel shortages, only elevated prices. “So, it’s not a matter of not being able to buy [oil]; it’s the price. So there’s no need to panic,” he declared.

    To soften the blow of global price increases for consumers, the government has already implemented a range of mitigation measures through the Ministry of Energy, Ministry of Finance, and Petrojam, designed to avoid passing the full weight of global price hikes onto Jamaican households. Petrojam’s pricing committee also maintains continuous monitoring of global market conditions, adjusting ex-refinery prices in line with shifts.

    However, Vaz revealed that this existing price-capping mechanism has come at a steep cost: Petrojam has already accumulated between $1.3 billion and $1.4 billion in unrecovered losses that have not been passed to consumers. If the current framework remains in place through June 2026, total losses would reach $11.8 billion – an amount equivalent to two-thirds of the current fiscal year’s total revenue measures, which Vaz called “unaffordable, unsustainable.”

    Vaz also addressed the broader geopolitical context driving price volatility, noting that stalled talks between Iran and the United States have worsened market uncertainty. While he remains hopeful that a diplomatic resolution can be reached, he acknowledged that discussions have moved “in the wrong direction since Monday.”

    To address the dual goals of fiscal stability and consumer protection, the Cabinet has approved a new tiered pricing mechanism that will replace the current flat $4.50 price cap. The new framework will bring domestic fuel prices into closer alignment with global market movements, allow for controlled, predictable weekly adjustments, protect consumers from sudden sharp shocks for smaller price increases, and give Petrojam greater flexibility to respond to large global price swings.

    Vaz explained that the revised system will likely include three separate tiers of caps, adjusted weekly in response to global market changes, making it far more agile than the inflexible flat cap currently in place. “This will allow Petrojam to be more agile and respond in a more timely manner to price volatility. What does that mean? It means that the $4.50 cap cannot be sustained, and it means that we’ll have to have several different tiers of caps – probably three – that will speak to what’s happening in the market and, as I said, pricing is weekly. So it means that we can adjust on a weekly basis,” he said.

    Closing his remarks, Vaz rejected any suggestion that the government can continue absorbing massive losses to keep prices artificially low, given competing pressing national priorities. “But let me be blatantly and truthfully upfront in your face; the Government of Jamaica cannot stomach an $11.8 billion [loss] with all of what we have to do and all of the contending priorities, and anybody who tell you any different… rubbish! No Government in a situation like this can sustain that,” the minister argued.

  • Two ZNS board members quit over political interference claims

    Two ZNS board members quit over political interference claims

    A growing political storm has engulfed The Bahamas’ state-owned public broadcasting sector ahead of the country’s upcoming general election, after two senior board members of the Broadcasting Corporation of The Bahamas (BCB) stepped down abruptly over what they frame as unacceptable government overreach into the independent governance of the national broadcaster ZNS.

    The controversy traces back to a formal decision by the full five-member BCB board earlier this month that placed general manager Clint Watson on a paid administrative leave of absence through the post-election period. Watson, who had previously mounted an unsuccessful bid to secure the Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) nomination for the Southern Shores constituency, was notified via an April 9 letter that his leave would extend at minimum through May 18 – one week after the general election – with a final return date left to the board’s discretion.

    In an official correspondence signed by BCB executive chairman Picewell Forbes, the board framed the arrangement as a proactive step to preserve public trust in the broadcaster’s neutrality during a sensitive electoral cycle. “This decision was reached in the interests of transparency, and in what the board determined to be the best interests of the corporation to maintain public confidence in its operations and leadership,” Forbes explained, adding that Watson would continue to receive his full salary and all contractual benefits throughout the leave period.

    That bipartisan board agreement was swiftly upended, however, when Prime Minister Philip “Brave” Davis directly intervened to override the directive, according to internal correspondence reviewed by *The Tribune*. The Prime Minister instructed Watson to resume his duties immediately, reversing the board’s leave order just days after it was issued.

    The Prime Minister’s unilateral action triggered immediate resignations from two sitting BCB board members: Garth Rolle and Charles Colebrooke. In an April 12 resignation letter obtained by *The Tribune*, Rolle argued that the government’s intervention effectively stripped the board of its authority to make governance decisions in the broadcaster’s best interest.

    “It seems obvious to me that we (the board) no longer have the confidence of the government to make decisions in the best interest of the corporation by cutting the legs from under us in such a manner,” Rolle wrote. “In reality, the board no longer have any powers to exercise in such an environment and I find this untenable.”

    Colebrooke followed with his own immediate resignation in an April 14 statement, where he expressed gratitude for the opportunity to serve the public broadcaster for more than four years. “I am very proud of our accomplishments and the commitment of the board members during this time,” he wrote.

    As of Tuesday, Forbes, Rolle, Colebrooke and Watson have all declined to provide additional comment beyond their formal written statements. Minister of Social Services, Information and Broadcasting Myles Laroda has confirmed that he is aware of the resignations and has notified the Prime Minister of the development. “That’s where we are right now,” Laroda told *The Tribune*. “I’ve spoken to both board members, and I don’t have anything further to say to that.”

    Political observers note the resignation comes at a particularly sensitive moment for ZNS, which plays a central role in disseminating election-related information to Bahamian voters. The incident is expected to intensify ongoing public scrutiny of claims that the ruling government has sought to exert inappropriate political influence over the state-run broadcaster during the electoral period.

  • Gibson’s ex-fiancée testifies she took immunity deal to tell the truth

    Gibson’s ex-fiancée testifies she took immunity deal to tell the truth

    A high-profile corruption trial centered on public infrastructure contracts in The Bahamas took another pivotal turn this week, as the star prosecution witness pushed back against aggressive defense questioning while standing by her agreement to cooperate with authorities. The case, which has gripped local political circles since opening in late 2023, involves Adrian Gibson, a Long Island Member of Parliament and former executive chairman of the country’s Water and Sewerage Corporation, who stands accused of misconduct tied to contract awards during his tenure at the state-owned utility. Alexsndria Mackey, Gibson’s one-time romantic partner and former business associate, took the stand in the Supreme Court on Tuesday to face cross-examination from Damian Gomez, KC, lead defense counsel for Gibson.

    Under hours of pointed questioning, Mackey reaffirmed her commitment to testifying truthfully, noting that her grant of immunity from prosecution is explicitly conditional on her full and honest cooperation with the investigation. She acknowledged that the serious criminal charges she originally faced, which carry severe legal penalties, were a major factor in her decision to negotiate a plea deal, but pushed back against defense claims that she fabricated testimony solely to avoid prison time. “I knew I needed to tell the truth,” Mackey told the court, adding that even with the threat of potential incarceration hanging over her, her decision to accept the deal was rooted in a requirement to disclose everything she knew about the business arrangements tied to the contracts.

    Mackey detailed the timeline of her decision to cooperate, explaining she moved forward with the immunity agreement shortly after co-defendant Tanya Demeritte was arrested and returned to The Bahamas. At that time, Mackey said, she learned she was also at risk of arrest, prompting her to move forward with negotiations through her legal representation. She flatly denied a defense claim that former Assistant Commissioner of Police Deleveaux pressured her to testify by threatening deportation or legal action against her parents, dismissing the assertion outright.

    Much of Tuesday’s cross-examination centered on the corporate structure of two firms tied to the case — Elite Maintenance and Oak Bay Limited. Mackey has maintained that she, Gibson, and Demeritte were the true beneficial owners of the companies, which won contracts from the Water and Sewerage Corporation during Gibson’s tenure. She admitted that the beneficial owners were never officially registered with authorities, and that bank documents listed Jerome Missick and Joan Knowles, two of Gibson’s co-defendants in the trial, as placeholder owners to conceal the identities of the true shareholders. When challenged by Gomez over whether she is hiding key corporate records and lying about having already turned relevant documents over to Gibson, Mackey denied the allegations.

    On one point of discrepancy, Gomez called into question Mackey’s recent claim that key documents were sent to Grand Bahama, noting she had not raised that detail in earlier police interviews. Mackey acknowledged that she did not mention specific trust documents during her initial interview with law enforcement, and could not recall when she first brought up the detail, but stood by her core account of the companies’ ownership structure. She confirmed she received payments from Oak Bay Limited, though she could not recall the full total of disbursements. She also told the court that Gibson outlined the roles of director nominees when the companies were first formed, though she acknowledged she never directly heard Gibson give instructions to placeholder owner Joan Knowles, confirming she followed his direction on all corporate matters when the pair were in a relationship.

    Additional details that emerged during the cross-examination included confirmation that attorney David Cash negotiated the immunity deal for Mackey and Demeritte, and that Mackey’s mother paid the $10,000 fine required under Demeritte’s plea agreement. Gibson is one of five defendants on trial over the contract awards, alongside former Water and Sewerage Corporation general manager Donaldson Jr, Joan Knowles, Peaches Farquharson, and Jerome Missick. The trial, which began in November 2023, is being presided over by Senior Justice Cheryl Grant Thompson, and is expected to continue through coming weeks as more evidence is presented and witnesses testify.

  • Pastor Bethel says FNM lottery proposal insults Bahamian voters

    Pastor Bethel says FNM lottery proposal insults Bahamian voters

    A decades-long debate over gambling legalization in The Bahamas has reignited after the opposition Free National Movement (FNM) announced plans to pursue a state-operated national lottery, drawing fierce pushback from a prominent religious and anti-gambling activist who says the plan directly defies the will of the Bahamian public.

    Pastor Lyall Bethel, who previously served as co-leader of the anti-gambling advocacy group Save Our Bahamas, has emerged as one of the most vocal critics of the proposal. In a public letter to the editor, Bethel called the FNM’s policy shift an unforgivable “slap in the face” to voters who overwhelmingly rejected both a national lottery and the regulation of unlicensed web shop gambling in a 2013 national referendum.

    Bethel says he was shocked by the opposition’s decision to resurrect the policy, noting that official referendum results make voter opposition unambiguous: 59.56 percent of participants rejected a national lottery, while 60.71 percent voted against regulating and taxing existing web shop gambling operations. For Bethel, the FNM’s choice to advance the proposal despite this clear outcome is not just a policy misstep — it is a deliberate insult to the majority of Bahamians who cast their ballots against expanded gambling.

    “To see the opposition wade foolishly and recklessly into this conversation with talk of a national lottery is insulting and a slap in the face to the majority of Bahamians who said NO to BOTH the proliferation of numbers house gambling AND a national lottery,” Bethel wrote. “THE PEOPLE SAID NO!”

    Beyond the breach of democratic will, Bethel argues the FNM has surrendered the moral high ground it held among the large bloc of Bahamian voters who oppose expanded gambling. He notes the party had a clear opportunity to demonstrate its commitment to respecting public opinion and the stance of the country’s majority religious institutions, but squandered that political advantage through what he calls an unnecessary and reckless action.

    The controversy stems from recent remarks by FNM leader Michael Pintard, who framed a state-run national lottery as a promising new revenue stream to fund national development projects. The proposal has pulled back the curtain on a decades-long national debate that has stalled multiple previous attempts to expand legal gambling, held back by widespread concerns over its potential social harms and questions about long-term feasibility.

    Incumbent Prime Minister Philip Davis has already dismissed the FNM’s plan as a shallow political “gimmick”, and Bethel is far from alone in his opposition. Other senior religious leaders across the country have renewed their longstanding objections to the proposal, pointing both to the 2013 referendum result and the proven social damage that expanded gambling brings to low-income and vulnerable communities.

    For Bethel, gambling is already a corrosive force in Bahamian society, which he describes as “a parasitic pariah on the soul of this country”. He warns that formalizing and expanding access through a national lottery would only exacerbate the social harms that Bahamians already grapple with, from problem gambling to increased economic inequality.

    Bethel also raised pointed questions about whether lottery proceeds would actually be used for the public development projects promised by the FNM, pointing to longstanding public anger over mismanagement and corruption in the handling of public funds across successive Bahamian governments. “Bahamians are tired of waste, corruption, failed rehashed ideas peddled by one government after the other,” he wrote.

    In closing, Bethel issued a direct warning to Pintard, urging the FNM leader to reverse course immediately before the proposal erodes his party’s political support. “I urge Mr Pintard to step back from this reckless, foolish decision that will cost you more votes than you think you gained,” he said. He added that the plan risks alienating both influential church groups and the large share of voters who oppose gambling, insisting that the 2013 referendum result must remain the final word on the issue. “The people said NO to a National Lottery! What part of ‘NO’ is unclear to the FNM?” he wrote.

  • Flood theory sinks!

    Flood theory sinks!

    A months-long controversy over missing procurement documentation at Jamaica’s University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI) took a sharp new turn this Tuesday, when top hospital officials formally dismissed the earlier claim that repeated flooding caused the disappearance of critical records. The development has intensified scrutiny of the public health institution’s governance and accountability frameworks before Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC).

    The saga first came to light during the PAC’s March 31 sitting, when Ainsworth Buckeridge, UHWI’s senior director of public procurement, suggested multiple flooding events that hit the hospital’s file storage areas could explain the gaps in documentation flagged in a recent audit by the auditor general. At that meeting, Buckeridge told lawmakers the storage zone had been inundated “at least twice or three times”, leaving open the conclusion that water damage had destroyed the missing records.

    That narrative fell apart entirely during Tuesday’s follow-up hearing, when Eric Hosin, UHWI’s acting Chief Executive Officer, confirmed to PAC chair Julian Robinson that while minor water damage had occurred during past floods, none of the incidents resulted in the destruction of any procurement files. “Mr Chair, based on our investigation, there was some damage. However, there was no destruction of any files,” Hosin told the committee.

    Robinson pressed for clarity, asking whether flooding could even partially account for the absence of the key documents. “In essence then, while there would have been damage, damage would not have prevented you from having access to the file, even if the file got wet. So the flooding could not explain the absence of the files, then,” Robinson said. Hosin confirmed this assessment, invalidating the core of the original explanation and opening the door to deeper investigations into UHWI’s administrative failures.

    Previously, the PAC had been informed that three flooding events – dated October 2020, March 2022, and October 2023 – had impacted the procurement document storage area. Tuesday’s testimony clarified that while these events caused minor disruption, they never destroyed files or blocked staff access to stored documentation.

    With the flooding explanation ruled out, attention has now shifted to the root causes of the missing records, which UHWI management itself has conceded stem from long-standing systemic problems rather than an unforeseen disaster. In a formal submission to the PAC responding to the auditor general’s findings, hospital leaders acknowledged that documentation gaps originated from “fragmented record-keeping systems across departments” and the “inconsistent application of procurement procedures” – confirming broader weaknesses in institutional governance.

    To date, UHWI officials report that 28 of the previously missing files have been recovered, but search efforts for the remaining unaccounted-for documents are still ongoing. Hosin told the committee that the hospital is currently working to reconstruct the missing records by cross-referencing data from the institution’s finance department and other internal units, with a target completion date for the reconstruction process set for the end of this month.

    Alongside efforts to resolve the missing records issue, hospital officials have also outlined corrective actions to address the flooding problem that was previously mis-cited as the cause of the disappearance. These interventions include targeted drainage improvements and roof repairs to the storage building, which Hosin said have eliminated further flood risks. “We have actually put in a drain to ensure water does not reach the building… as well as we have repaired the roof of the building. And we have not seen any further problems with any flooding or water damage on that building,” he explained.

    Even with these corrective steps in place, PAC members have stressed that serious concerns remain about how critical procurement records could go missing in a major public institution that manages large amounts of taxpayer funds. Robinson confirmed that the committee will continue its investigation into the incident, with a particular focus on evaluating UHWI’s existing systems for document storage, internal accountability, and external oversight to prevent similar gaps from occurring in the future.

  • Iran military warns it will block Red Sea if US naval blockade continues

    Iran military warns it will block Red Sea if US naval blockade continues

    Escalating geopolitical tensions between Iran and the United States have entered a new dangerous phase, with Tehran’s top military command issuing a stark warning on Wednesday that it will shut down all commercial shipping activity across three critical global waterways – the Persian Gulf, Sea of Oman, and Red Sea – if Washington’s newly imposed naval blockade of Iranian ports remains in place.

    According to an official statement broadcast by Iranian state television, Ali Abdollahi, head of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s military central command center, emphasized that any continued American blockade that threatens the safety and security of Iranian commercial ships and oil tankers would act as a precursor to breaking a previously established ceasefire between the two parties.

    “The powerful armed forces of the Islamic republic will not allow any exports or imports to continue in the Persian Gulf, the Sea of Oman, and the Red Sea,” Abdollahi stated in the address. He further clarified that the aggressive response would be rooted in Iran’s constitutional duty to protect its core national sovereignty and strategic interests, leaving no room for compromise on the issue.

    The current standoff traces back to failed diplomatic talks held over the weekend in the Pakistani capital of Islamabad. Negotiations between US and Iranian delegations aimed at reaching a mutually acceptable agreement to end ongoing hostilities between the two nations ended without any breakthrough. Three days after the collapsed talks, the United States moved to implement a full naval blockade of Iranian maritime ports.

    Despite the formal announcement of the blockade, preliminary data from independent maritime tracking services published Tuesday suggested that multiple vessels departing from Iranian ports had successfully transited the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic chokepoint that connects the Persian Gulf to the open Arabian Sea, without being intercepted by US naval forces.

    On Wednesday, Iran’s semi-official Tasnim News Agency reinforced this observation, citing unnamed sources with direct knowledge of the country’s maritime operations. The agency confirmed that commercial shipping activities from Iran’s southern coastal ports have continued uninterrupted following the US blockade announcement, noting that multiple Iranian commercial cargo vessels had set sail for destinations across the globe in the 24-hour period leading up to the report.

  • JACDEN’s $10-million payment raises questions

    JACDEN’s $10-million payment raises questions

    Calls for transparency grew louder on Tuesday during a public accounts committee (PAC) hearing, as a ruling-party Jamaican MP pressed senior leaders of the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI) for clear answers about a $10.8 million customs duty payment made by a private company for imports declared under the public hospital’s tax-exempt name — answers that hospital officials were unable to provide.

    The growing controversy revolves around the transaction attributed to JACDEN, a private firm where opposition Member of Parliament Dennis Gordon, representative for St Andrew East Central, holds a principal leadership role. The payment was made to Jamaica Customs for goods imported under UHWI’s name, tying the case to a broader investigation into misuse of the major public hospital’s tax-exempt import status.

    This probe is part of an ongoing PAC review of damning findings from Jamaica’s Auditor General, which uncovered repeated misuse of UHWI’s tax-exempt privileges to allow private companies to import goods duty-free. The practice has resulted in millions of dollars in lost government revenue from unpaid customs duties, prompting wide-ranging scrutiny of regulatory and institutional oversight.

    During Tuesday’s committee sitting, Government MP Heroy Clarke questioned the legal and procedural foundation for any private entity to pay customs duties on behalf of a public medical institution, especially when the hospital is formally listed as the official importer of record. He repeatedly pressed acting UHWI CEO Eric Hosin for clarity on what authority allowed a third-party private firm to cover duties for goods imported in the hospital’s name, asking “On what ground, what condition, what authority, that some goods that were brought in the name of UHWI, that a third party, a private entity, would have gotten the authority to pay duty on behalf of UHWI.”

    In response to the committee’s questions, Hosin stated that no such private payment arrangement had been approved by the hospital during his tenure as acting chief executive. However, Clarke pushed back, pointing to official documentation submitted to the committee that confirms the payment was processed by Jamaica Customs despite UHWI being named as the importer. He continued to press for clarity, asking “On what grounds did this company, JACDEN, pay over $10 million to Customs, Customs accepting that money in the name of UHWI — because the goods belong to UHWI?”

    Ultimately, Hosin conceded that he could not explain how the unusual transaction was approved or processed, telling the committee “I don’t know. You’d have to speak to Customs.”

    This unresolved exchange has amplified longstanding concerns about critical gaps in regulatory oversight, particularly around how public institutions’ tax-exempt status can be exploited by private actors for unauthorized financial gain. Clarke also flagged a documented violation of Jamaica’s Customs Act, noting that UHWI has been officially cited for making a false import declaration in breach of Section 209 of the legislation. Customs has notified the hospital that it may file an objection to the citation, but requires a deposit to process the appeal. Clarke asked UHWI officials whether the institution had drafted an objection and paid the required deposit, and Hosin confirmed no action has been taken on the citation to date.

    The case has gained heightened political attention due to Gordon’s direct ties to JACDEN, placing the opposition MP at the center of the unfolding scandal. The controversy has already expanded beyond the PAC, with Parliament’s Ethics Committee launching a review to re-examine previous disclosures Gordon made about his business interests. As the PAC’s investigation moves forward, Clarke has made clear that full public clarity will be required not just from UHWI leadership, but also from Jamaica Customs, particularly around the agency’s protocols for accepting third-party payments in import transactions involving public institutions.

  • Big UHWI bill, no repayment plan

    Big UHWI bill, no repayment plan

    A major financial and compliance crisis has emerged at Jamaica’s leading public healthcare institution, the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI), with lawmakers on Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC) learning Tuesday that the facility carries more than JMD $40 billion in unpaid tax obligations — and has no formal structured plan to repay the massive debt, all while operating on an expiring temporary Tax Compliance Certificate (TCC).

    The stunning disclosure was made during the PAC’s ongoing review of a damning auditor general’s report into questionable procurement practices at the hospital, opening a new front of scrutiny over the institution’s long-term financial management and failure to meet core statutory requirements.

    Appearing before the committee to answer questions from PAC Chair Julian Robinson, UHWI Acting Chief Executive Officer Eric Hosin confirmed the staggering scale of the outstanding arrears. Hosin clarified that the full $40 billion sum includes years of accumulated compound interest and late payment penalties, with the underlying pre-penalty principal amount of the debt sitting at approximately $18 billion.

    The revelation immediately sparked urgent concern among committee members, who zeroed in on whether statutory payroll deductions taken directly from UHWI employees’ salaries — including contributions to the National Housing Trust (NHT) and National Insurance Scheme (NIS) — had actually been remitted to the relevant government agencies as required by law. Robinson highlighted the direct, tangible harm this could inflict on ordinary hospital workers if the funds had been withheld.

    “It would be important for us to know, particularly on the employee side, because this would impact people who might go to NHT seeking a benefit, people who are retired and would go to the NIS office and can’t get a benefit,” Robinson told the hearing.

    Hosin moved quickly to reassure the committee that no current UHWI employees have faced negative consequences from the debt crisis, confirming that the hospital is now fully up to date on all monthly NHT and NIS contribution remittances. He explained that the facility’s ongoing cash flow crisis only affects older outstanding tax obligations, noting “we don’t have enough money to pay the other tax obligations.” Those unpaid older obligations include outstanding income tax and education tax payments, Hosin added.

    Lawmakers continued to press for answers on how such a massive debt could build up largely unchecked over time. Hosin acknowledged the arrears stretch back multiple years, but he was unable to provide the committee with a precise timeline for when the debt began to accumulate during Tuesday’s sitting.

    Adding to lawmakers’ alarm is the hospital’s shaky tax compliance status. Despite owing tens of billions in unpaid taxes, Hosin confirmed UHWI is currently operating on a temporary TCC that is set to expire on May 6. Most worryingly for the committee, Hosin admitted the hospital has not negotiated any formal repayment agreement with Tax Administration Jamaica (TAJ) to resolve the outstanding debt — a requirement for most entities with large tax arrears seeking to retain compliance status.

    Robinson questioned how the hospital could be granted any form of compliant status without a structured repayment plan in place, noting that standard regulatory protocols would require such an arrangement for any organization carrying major unpaid tax obligations.

    In response, Hosin explained that negotiations to resolve the debt are still in their very early stages. He outlined that UHWI’s leadership plans to first consult with the Ministry of Health and Wellness before approaching the Ministry of Finance to discuss potential pathways forward, including possible relief for the accumulated interest and penalties tied to the original debt.

    Hosin also revealed that UHWI operated for an extended period without any valid TCC at all, though he again could not provide a clear timeline for how long that status lasted. That additional revelation raised fresh questions about the hospital’s ability to legally import critical medical supplies independently, and ties back to earlier audit findings that the facility’s tax-exempt status was misused for private business transactions involving third-party entities.

    Chairman Robinson stressed that pinning down how long UHWI has operated without full tax compliance is a critical part of the PAC’s ongoing investigation, particularly as the committee probes whether the failure to meet statutory obligations is connected to the procurement irregularities already under review.

    Robinson also called for a full, itemized breakdown of the $40 billion debt, so lawmakers can clearly distinguish what portion of the liability stems from unpaid employee payroll deductions like NHT and NIS versus other unpaid tax types.

    While Hosin repeatedly reiterated that current employees have not been impacted by the backlog, noting the hospital is current on monthly contributions and has put safeguards in place to ensure no worker is denied rightful benefits, Robinson remained firm that the committee will not move forward without a full comprehensive ageing report that details when each portion of the debt was accumulated and breaks down every component of the total liability. The PAC’s investigation into both the procurement irregularities and the broader tax debt crisis is ongoing.

  • US says nine vessels turned back in 48 hours of Iran port blockade

    US says nine vessels turned back in 48 hours of Iran port blockade

    In the escalating Middle East tensions that have roiled regional shipping and diplomatic relations, the United States military made a key announcement Wednesday regarding its newly imposed naval blockade around Iranian ports: over the first 48 hours of the operation, US forces successfully intercepted and turned back nine vessels attempting to depart Iranian territorial waters.

    US Central Command (CENTCOM), the military wing overseeing all American deployments across the Middle East, shared the update officially via a public post on X, the social platform formerly known as Twitter. In its statement, the command emphasized that zero vessels had managed to break through the US naval cordon established as part of the blockade. “Nine vessels have complied with direction from US forces to turn around and return toward an Iranian port or coastal area,” the post read, adding that “No vessels have made it past US forces.”

    This official claim, however, runs directly counter to independent maritime tracking data collected and analyzed by global shipping analysts. According to data from Kpler, a prominent provider of maritime logistics and tracking data, at least seven vessels connected to Iran passed through the Strait of Hormuz after the US blockade officially went into effect at 14:00 GMT this past Monday. Of those seven, at least three ships that departed Iranian ports successfully crossed the key global shipping chokepoint on Tuesday, though some other vessels on the route ultimately reversed course.

    The naval blockade is the latest escalation in a rapidly unfolding conflict that has upended regional security. After the US-Israeli joint air campaign against Iran launched on February 28, Iranian forces moved to close the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic waterway through which roughly 20% of the world’s global oil supplies pass. Following the collapse of regional peace talks over the weekend, the US officially announced its full naval blockade of Iranian ports on Sunday, marking a sharp escalation of American military involvement in the conflict.