Carib Scope

分类： politics

  • IDEICE explores alliance with University of Chicago to strengthen public policies in the Dominican Republic

    IDEICE explores alliance with University of Chicago to strengthen public policies in the Dominican Republic

    CHICAGO — A delegation of senior researchers and administrative leaders from the Dominican Institute for Evaluation and Research of Educational Quality (IDEICE) has completed a working visit to Chicago, where they held targeted collaborative talks with experts from the Development Innovation Lab (DIL) as part of a landmark project to launch the Dominican Republic’s first evidence-focused public policy laboratory.

    Headed by IDEICE Executive Director Jesús Andújar Avilés, the delegation traveled to the University of Chicago’s main campus to meet with DIL leadership, including DIL Faculty Director Ryan Cooper, Executive Director Emely Cupito, and a team of senior research fellows specializing in public sector innovation. Over the course of the two-day working meeting, the two groups held in-depth exchanges on three core themes: frameworks for scaling successful public innovation projects, rigorous methodological approaches to evidence-based policy evaluation, and concrete pathways for long-term partnership to adapt DIL’s proven model to the Dominican Republic’s unique policy context.

    During the visit, IDEICE representatives also gained detailed insights into DIL’s ongoing global portfolio, which leverages advanced data analytics, impact evaluation, and randomized control trial methods to tackle pressing social challenges from poverty to public health access, all with the goal of helping governments craft more effective, equitable public policies. In a post-visit statement, IDEICE emphasized that the trip builds on the institution’s longstanding mission to expand domestic research, innovation, and policy evaluation capacity across the Dominican Republic. The planned public policy lab, when established, will serve as a central hub for translating rigorous applied research into actionable, high-impact policy decisions that benefit Dominican communities, the statement added.

  • Abinader receives Suriname President at the National Palace

    Abinader receives Suriname President at the National Palace

    On Monday, a key moment of diplomatic exchange unfolded in Santo Domingo, as Dominican Republic President Luis Abinader extended a formal, high-profile welcome to his Surinamese counterpart Jennifer Geerlings-Simons at the National Palace. The visit marks a deliberate push by both Caribbean nations to deepen longstanding bilateral relations and unlock new areas of cross-border cooperation that align with their shared national interests.

    To mark the significance of the official visit, Geerlings-Simons was greeted with full traditional military honors befitting a head of state. The ceremonial opening included a 21-gun salute, the official playing of both the Dominican Republic and Suriname national anthems, and a formal inspection of the Dominican honor guard by the visiting leader. Once the formal welcome ceremony concluded, the two heads of state first convened for a closed-door private meeting to discuss core priority issues, before transitioning to expanded bilateral talks that included full senior delegations from both governments. These broader discussions covered a wide range of topics of mutual concern to both nations.

    The structured official agenda for the visit outlines a series of key diplomatic milestones. Among the scheduled events are the signing of multiple new bilateral agreements, the release of a joint formal declaration outlining shared priorities, and an official luncheon hosted by President Abinader in honor of his visiting counterpart. Geerlings-Simons is also set to pay her respects at Santo Domingo’s Altar of the Fatherland, before attending a formal reception hosted by the Dominican government. On Tuesday, the final day of the visit, the Surinamese president will travel to the Dominican National Congress, hold meetings with top legislative leaders, and take part in a special parliamentary session before wrapping up her official visit to the country.

  • Suriname President Jennifer Geerlings-Simons arrives in Dominican Republic for official visit

    Suriname President Jennifer Geerlings-Simons arrives in Dominican Republic for official visit

    PUNTA CANA – Surinamese President Jennifer Geerlings-Simons touched down in the Dominican Republic Saturday, kicking off an official working visit that will extend through June 2. The visiting head of state was greeted with full military honors upon arrival, and received by high-ranking Dominican government representatives, including senior officials from the Dominican Ministry of Foreign Affairs and members of the Dominican diplomatic mission stationed in Suriname. Geerlings-Simons is not traveling alone; a delegation of senior Surinamese government officials, including Foreign Minister Melvin Bouva and Transport, Communications and Tourism Minister Raymond Landveld, is accompanying her throughout the visit.

    On Monday, the diplomatic schedule will center on high-level talks at the Dominican National Palace, where Geerlings-Simons is set to hold a full slate of official meetings with Dominican President Luis Abinader. The packed agenda opens with a closed-door private bilateral discussion between the two leaders, followed by plenary talks between the full delegations from both nations. After the discussions, the two sides will hold a formal signing ceremony for multiple new cooperation agreements, before issuing a joint official declaration outlining shared priorities. Following the meetings, Geerlings-Simons will join Dominican Foreign Minister Roberto Álvarez to lay a wreath and pay respects at the Altar of the Fatherland, a prominent national memorial in the country.

    Tuesday will bring the next phase of diplomatic engagement: the Surinamese president is scheduled to hold talks with top Dominican congressional leaders before delivering a landmark address to a joint session of the Dominican bicameral legislature.

    This official visit marks a key milestone in the steadily growing bilateral relationship between the Dominican Republic and Suriname. Over recent years, the two Caribbean nations have actively expanded collaborative frameworks across a range of high-priority sectors, including energy, hydrocarbon development, agriculture, and commercial air services. Recent diplomatic efforts and existing agreements have centered on three core mutual goals: increasing bilateral trade volumes, advancing shared progress in sustainable energy development, and deepening cross-sector collaboration that benefits both nations’ populations and economies.

  • INPOSDOM issues commemorative stamp marking 50 years of Dominican Republic-Guyana relations

    INPOSDOM issues commemorative stamp marking 50 years of Dominican Republic-Guyana relations

    SANTO DOMINGO — A new chapter of public commemoration for Caribbean bilateral friendship has opened, as the Dominican Postal Institute (INPOSDOM) has unveiled a special commemorative stamp to mark the golden jubilee of formal diplomatic relations between the Dominican Republic and the Cooperative Republic of Guyana. The limited-edition release is designed to honor five decades of mutual cooperation, deep-rooted friendship, and collaborative regional partnership between the two Caribbean nations, which first established official diplomatic ties in 1970.

    At the official launch ceremony held to introduce the new stamp, INPOSDOM Director General Erick Guzmán framed the collectible issue as more than a postal item: it stands as a tangible symbol of the enduring, robust bonds that connect the two countries. Guzmán further highlighted that the stamp reflects both nations’ shared dedication to three core goals: advancing regional integration across the Caribbean bloc, pursuing inclusive sustainable development, and expanding cross-border collaboration on shared priorities.

    Ernesto Torres, the Dominican Republic’s ambassador to Guyana, also spoke at the event, echoing the significance of the commemorative project. He emphasized that the stamp launch is not just a symbolic gesture, but a clear reflection of the ongoing expansion of ties across diplomatic, commercial, and cultural spheres between the two nations. This growing partnership has hit key milestones in recent years, most notably the opening of the Dominican Republic’s permanent embassy in Georgetown, Guyana’s capital, in 2023.

    The special stamp issue totals 7,500 individual units, and its design draws on the distinct cultural heritage of both countries to celebrate their shared history. The artwork features two of the nations’ most iconic architectural landmarks: the Dominican Republic’s Santa María de la Encarnación Cathedral, and Guyana’s St. George’s Cathedral. Officials from both countries note that the release comes as both sides continue to work toward deepening bilateral cooperation across multiple sectors, building on 50 years of positive relations to create new opportunities for collaboration in the years ahead.

  • Verkiezingen Colombia: Linkse hervormingen vs rechtse veiligheidsmaatregelen

    Verkiezingen Colombia: Linkse hervormingen vs rechtse veiligheidsmaatregelen

    On May 31, Colombia kicked off the first round of its pivotal presidential election, a vote that will chart the South American nation’s future course on core issues ranging from domestic security to economic policy and international relations. More than 40 million eligible Colombian voters are heading to polling stations, which opened at 8 a.m. local time, with final official results projected to be announced by 8 p.m. the same day. Given pre-election tensions and security concerns, roughly 400,000 military personnel and police officers have been deployed nationwide to safeguard voting operations, with security teams maintaining a visible presence on streets across major cities including Bogota.

    Three leading candidates dominate the race, each offering sharply different policy visions for the country. Topping pre-election opinion polls is 63-year-old left-wing Senator Iván Cepeda, the son of a assassinated communist leader. Cepeda, who has pledged to continue and deepen the progressive reforms begun by current left-wing President Gustavo Petro, currently holds enough support to place first but is not projected to clear the 50% threshold needed to win the election outright in a single round. That outcome would push the race to a runoff round scheduled for June 21.

    Cepeda’s core policy platform centers on advancing peace negotiations with illegal armed groups, a strategy that has made limited progress under the Petro administration. He has also proposed sweeping structural social reforms to reduce Colombia’s entrenched inequality and poverty, including higher taxes on the nation’s wealthiest citizens, the transfer of 1 million hectares of land to victims of the country’s 60-year-long internal armed conflict, and expanded public access to healthcare.

    Trailing Cepeda closely in the polls is 47-year-old independent lawyer and businessman Abelardo De La Espriella, a political outsider who has never held public office. Often compared to El Salvador’s hardline President Nayib Bukele for his blunt rhetoric and policy priorities, De La Espriella has centered his campaign on an aggressive crackdown on illegal armed groups. His platform includes plans to construct 10 new mega-prisons, alongside anti-poverty measures focused on expanding access to education, healthcare, and affordable housing. He has repeatedly warned voters that a Cepeda victory would entrench the controversial economic policies of the Petro administration, including the ban on new oil exploration projects.

    In third place in pre-election polling is right-wing Senator Paloma Valencia, backed by former Colombian President Álvaro Uribe and until recently the front-runner among right-wing candidates. Her policy agenda overlaps broadly with De La Espriella’s, calling for tough action against corruption, drug trafficking, and illegal armed groups. She also supports cutting corporate taxes to spur job growth, and funding new social programs through a resumption of large-scale oil and gas exploration.

    The election is widely viewed as a critical bellwether for Colombia’s long-term direction, with particular focus on how the new administration will approach domestic security and the country’s long-standing diplomatic and economic relationship with the United States. Voters are deeply divided over the future of Petro’s progressive agenda, with sharp disagreements over how to address decades of violence, widespread economic inequality, and the role of fossil fuels in the country’s economy.

  • LISTEN: PM Defends Son’s Purchase and Resale of Long Bay Beachfront Parcel

    LISTEN: PM Defends Son’s Purchase and Resale of Long Bay Beachfront Parcel

    Amid growing public controversy over the proposed Long Bay Zen Resort in Antigua and Barbuda, Prime Minister Gaston Browne has stepped forward to lay out the full, decades-long ownership and development background of the Long Bay site, pushing back against widespread criticism that misrepresents the project’s footprint and legal standing.

    Speaking during his weekly *Browne and Browne* radio broadcast on Saturday, the prime minister emphasized that the new resort is not an unauthorized encroachment on untouched public beach land, as critics have claimed. Instead, it marks a long-delayed redevelopment of the original Long Bay Hotel, a hospitality site that has operated in the area for more than half a century.

    To address one of the public’s biggest concerns — restricted access to Long Bay Beach — Browne explicitly refuted rumors that the development would block public entry to the coastline. “For those who are worried that this project will take over Long Bay and cut off ordinary people and other beach users from the shore, that is simply not the case,” he said. “We are only redeveloping the footprint of the old Long Bay Hotel.”

    Browne walked through the project’s modern development timeline to clarify delays that have sparked speculation. He explained that the current development group purchased the former hotel site roughly 11 years ago, with initial plans for a much larger construction project. Those plans were derailed unexpectedly when the developers lost tens of millions of dollars deposited in an offshore bank that collapsed into financial insolvency, bringing work to a halt for years.

    The prime minister also addressed criticism from opposition groups over the 1-acre beachfront parcel tied to the site, pointing to a surprising parallel with the previous United Progressive Party (UPP) administration. Browne recalled that when the UPP was in power, the party explored a plan to acquire that same waterfront acre as part of its own Long Bay hotel development proposal — a move that Browne’s Antigua and Barbuda Labour Party (ABLP) opposed at the time over concerns that it would shrink public beach access.

    “What the UPP planned to do was take that waterfront acre and push ordinary members of the public into a small corner, cutting down their access to the beach,” Browne said. That proposed UPP transaction never ultimately moved forward, and after years of no completed payment, the parcel was re-listed on the open market.

    Browne openly acknowledged that his own son purchased the 1-acre parcel from owner LaFourie in 2014, after negotiating the price down from an asking price of roughly US$1.2 million to a final sale price of US$750,000. Several years later, his son sold the parcel to the Chinese investors who are now leading the Long Bay Zen Resort project for US$1.5 million. The prime minister stressed that this was a straightforward private transaction between two independent private parties, with no improper government influence or intervention involved, rejecting claims of political favoritism.

    According to Browne, the full timeline of the property confirms that the land has been privately owned and actively listed for development for decades. The current Zen Resort project is entirely contained within the boundaries of the former Long Bay Hotel, he said, and does not encroach on any public beach lands.

    Recently, the Long Bay Zen Resort officially broke ground. The project is planned as a low-carbon luxury development, and will include 120 guest rooms when completed.

  • LISTEN: PM Browne Says A Proposal To Accept Up To 120 Deportees Is Not in Antigua’s Best Interest

    LISTEN: PM Browne Says A Proposal To Accept Up To 120 Deportees Is Not in Antigua’s Best Interest

    As bilateral negotiations over a proposed deportation arrangement continue between Antigua and Barbuda and the United States, Prime Minister Gaston Browne has publicly drawn a hard line against a U.S. request that would see the small Caribbean nation accept up to 120 third-country nationals annually, calling the proposal “totally unacceptable” and prioritizing the country’s limited capacity and national security over blind cooperation. Speaking during his weekly *Browne and Browne* radio broadcast on Saturday, Browne clarified that Antigua and Barbuda has only offered to accept a maximum of 10 deportees per year under any finalized deal, a cap that aligns with the nation’s size and inherent vulnerabilities.
    Browne revealed that the initial 120-person proposal came with no binding commitments for U.S. assistance, nor any guarantee that comprehensive background checks would be completed on individuals before transfer. That lack of structure, he emphasized, is a non-starter for his administration. “At one point I was told that they had asked us to accept as many as 120 individuals and there was no guaranteed assistance, no guaranteed due diligence. And I said to them that that is totally unacceptable,” Browne told listeners.
    The prime minister outlined three non-negotiable conditions that Antigua and Barbuda is requiring Washington to meet before any agreement can move forward. First, all individuals must undergo rigorous vetting by U.S. law enforcement and immigration authorities to screen out criminal elements. Browne stressed that even a single high-risk individual can have outsized negative consequences for a small nation like Antigua and Barbuda, saying “one criminal element coming into our country can make a difference.”
    Second, Browne insisted that every deportee transferred to the country must hold valid, official travel documentation. He explained that undocumented migrants detained in the U.S. often destroy their identity papers to avoid deportation, and Antigua and Barbuda cannot absorb stateless individuals with no verifiable background. “What happens sometimes is some of these immigrants, who they detain as soon as they get to the United States, they tear up their travel documents and we can’t have them come here as stateless individuals,” he said.
    While Browne reaffirmed Antigua and Barbuda’s commitment to maintaining a constructive, cooperative relationship with the United States, he made clear that cooperation will never come at the cost of the island nation’s core national interests. “We have said to them that, look, they have their issues, and we want to help. We want to be a cooperative state. But we cannot participate or agree to anything that is to our detriment,” he said.
    The prime minister pushed back against any expectation that he would accept an unfavorable deal, asking rhetorically: “I mean, can anybody justify the prime minister of this country being part of any decision, or agreeing, or being compliant with anything that is not in the best interest of this country?” He noted that Antigua and Barbuda’s small geographic size and population leave it uniquely vulnerable to security risks, requiring extreme caution when entering any arrangements involving the transfer of foreign nationals. “We’re small, powerless and very vulnerable. Based on that vulnerability, we have to make sure that we keep our country safe and secure,” Browne said.
    He added that the administration’s top concern is avoiding the accidental admission of individuals with criminal histories, a outcome that he says would never happen under his leadership. “Where there is any probability for us to even inadvertently and complicitly allow criminals to come into the country, as I said, that’s not in my leadership,” he stated.
    As of Saturday, Browne confirmed that negotiations with U.S. officials remain ongoing, and Antigua and Barbuda has not yet received a formal response from the U.S. State Department after the country submitted its latest counter-proposal outlining its conditions and annual cap. Discussions on the arrangement were launched after the two sides signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding that outlined a framework for Antigua and Barbuda accepting a limited number of third-country nationals. From the start of negotiations, the Antigua and Barbuda government has maintained that while it stands ready to assist its international partners, any final agreement must align with the country’s national security needs and practical capacity to absorb new arrivals.

  • Al-Rawi fires back after Nizam demands LATT probe

    Al-Rawi fires back after Nizam demands LATT probe

    A high-stakes political and legal controversy is unfolding in Trinidad and Tobago, after former House Speaker and practicing attorney Nizam Mohammed launched a public call for the Law Association of Trinidad and Tobago (LATT) to launch formal disciplinary proceedings against two Opposition Senators, Faris Al-Rawi and Janelle John-Bates, over their roles in editing a key parliamentary witness statement. The conflict traces back to an inquiry by the Public Administration and Appropriations Committee (PAAC) into the government’s pharmaceutical procurement process, when former Health Minister Terrence Deyalsingh submitted a formal witness statement to the committee. Hidden electronic track changes embedded in the submitted document exposed that edits to the statement had been made by John-Bates and Al-Rawi, sparking immediate public outrage and parliamentary scrutiny. At the time of the edits, John-Bates – herself an attorney – served as a sitting member of the PAAC conducting the inquiry, while Al-Rawi, a former Attorney General, was acting as Deyalsingh’s legal representation. The controversy prompted the Senate to refer the matter to its Standing Privileges Committee for investigation, but the parliamentary session was prorogued in late May before the committee could conclude its probe or issue any sanctions. In a formal media statement released Thursday, Mohammed argued that the lack of progress has left both senators facing no accountability, a outcome he called unacceptable for a country that claims to crack down on corruption and unethical conduct. “You cannot claim an all-out war against crime and then be selective in applying sanctions,” Mohammed noted in his release, emphasizing that allegations of evidence tampering in a quasi-judicial parliamentary inquiry carry severe ramifications for the integrity of the national legal profession. Mohammed reminded the public that LATT was established under the 1986 Legal Profession Act specifically to regulate attorney conduct, uphold professional standards, and defend the rule of law in Trinidad and Tobago. He cited binding provisions in the national legal Code of Ethics that require all attorneys to uphold their oath of office, maintain personal integrity, and refuse to assist any party in acting contrary to national law. Given the information already available in the public domain, Mohammed said LATT has a statutory duty to actively examine whether the two senators’ conduct warrants formal disciplinary action. “Justice demands active consideration by the Law Association in the discharge of its statutory duty,” Mohammed stated. Reached for comment by media outlets, Al-Rawi forcefully rejected Mohammed’s demands, dismissing the call as “childishly unfortunate”, legally ill-informed, and potentially defamatory. Al-Rawi accused Mohammed of cherry-picking sections of the Legal Profession Act and Code of Ethics to push a misleading political narrative, while ignoring core legal protections such as attorney-client privilege and longstanding rules restricting premature public disclosure of Privileges Committee proceedings. Al-Rawi argued that Mohammed failed to basic journalistic due diligence by reaching out for his side of the story before going public, a misstep that led Mohammed to spread “political falsehoods” about his conduct. “Had he done any of the aforementioned, Mr Mohammed would have avoided spewing political falsehoods and would likely have satisfied himself that there was no wrongdoing by me,” Al-Rawi said. The former Attorney General added that he is eager for parliamentary gag orders on Privileges Committee disclosures to be lifted so he can publicly clear his name, confirming that he plans to request permission from the committee to release all relevant documents he submitted to the panel when Parliament reconvenes on June 5. Al-Rawi also revealed he is currently consulting his legal team to determine whether Mohammed’s public comments exceed the legal protections for fair comment and public privilege, opening the door to potential legal action against the former House Speaker. Turning to broader national priorities, Al-Rawi argued that the entire controversy is a distracting distraction from the urgent issues of public safety and economic stability that should command Trinidad and Tobago’s attention right now. “I believe that our nation should be focused on the issues of lives and livelihoods as opposed to cheap, ill-informed and childish distractions,” he said. For her part, John-Bates has already issued a public apology to the Senate for her role in editing the witness statement and submitted her resignation to Opposition Leader Pennelope Beckles, while maintaining she never intended to undermine the integrity of the parliamentary inquiry process. Beckles has not yet announced a final decision on whether to accept John-Bates’ resignation, leaving that portion of the controversy unresolved pending Parliament’s reconvening next month.

  • Colombia beschuldigt Ecuador van ‘bewuste inmenging’ in presidentsverkiezingen

    Colombia beschuldigt Ecuador van ‘bewuste inmenging’ in presidentsverkiezingen

    Diplomatic tensions between neighboring Latin American nations Colombia and Ecuador have escalated sharply after Colombia’s foreign ministry leveled a formal accusation of “deliberate interference” in Colombia’s upcoming presidential election, following a controversial tariff agreement between Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa and a Colombian opposition candidate. The dispute unfolded over the weekend, just one day before Colombians head to the polls to elect their next head of state.

    On Friday, Noboa announced that Ecuador would lift all bilateral import tariffs starting June 1, a decision reached after a phone call with Abelardo De La Espriella, an independent right-wing presidential candidate running in Sunday’s election. Taking to social media platform X, Noboa framed the policy shift as a response to De La Espriella’s commitment to launching “a genuine joint fight against narcoterrorism.” The two leaders also agreed to a new extradition deal for Ecuadorian criminals hiding out in Colombian territory.

    Colombia’s foreign ministry rejected the framing of the tariff lift as a goodwill gesture from the Ecuadorian government in an official statement, dismissing the presentation as deliberately misleading. In a reciprocal move, Bogotá announced it would roll back its own retaliatory trade measures that it implemented in response to Ecuador’s earlier tariffs, a step that comes laced with political reproach amid the pre-election period.

    Trade and security relations between the two countries have been strained for months, long before this latest diplomatic clash. Last year, Ecuador imposed new import tariffs on Colombian goods, accusing Bogotá of failing to crack down on drug trafficking along their 586-kilometer shared border. Colombian President Gustavo Petro has repeatedly and forcefully denied these accusations, pointing to the inherent complexity of security challenges in the border region.

    This year’s Colombian presidential election pits De La Espriella against two leading contenders: Iván Cepeda, Petro’s ally, and right-wing Senator Paloma Valencia. The long-running tensions between Bogotá and Quito are rooted in decades of unresolved border disputes, as well as ongoing disagreements over how to combat drug trafficking and armed criminal groups that have destabilized the broader region. Ecuador’s original tariffs were explicitly designed as a pressure tactic to force Colombia to adopt harsher measures against cross-border organized crime, a demand Colombia has consistently pushed back against.

    Now, the direct involvement of a presidential candidate in the tariff dispute has amplified volatility at a critical political juncture. Colombia’s election will shape the country’s trajectory for years to come, at a moment when the entire Latin American border region continues to grapple with pervasive violence and persistent economic uncertainty, making external political interference a particularly inflammatory issue for Colombian voters.

  • Meerderheid DNA lijkt voor in staat van beschuldigingstelling ex-ministers te zijn; deadline nadert

    Meerderheid DNA lijkt voor in staat van beschuldigingstelling ex-ministers te zijn; deadline nadert

    As the clock ticks down on Suriname’s National Assembly (DNA) to rule on a high-stakes indictment request from Prosecutor General Garcia Paragsingh targeting three former ministers — Bronto Somohardjo, Riad Nurmohamed, and Gillmore Hoefdraad — committee leaders are moving to wrap up work before the legal deadline expires on June 9. Despite the tight timeline, Rabin Parmessar, chair of the parliamentary special committee handling the case, has moved to calm public anxiety, insisting there is ample time to complete the process before the cut-off date.

    The committee has already concluded all public hearings on the matter and is now drafting its final report, which will first be presented to DNA’s internal caucus meeting before a final binding vote is held in a full plenary public session. Parmessar told local outlet Starnieuws that the public has no reason to panic, confirming the committee will gather this week to finalize the concluding report for submission. He also emphasized that the body has no intention of allowing the legal deadline to lapse without taking formal action. Under Article 4, Paragraph 3 of Suriname’s Law on the Indictment of Political Office Holders (WIPA), a prosecutor general’s request is automatically rejected if DNA fails to issue a decision before the mandated deadline.

    The cross-party committee is made up of seven members: Rabin Parmessar (NDP), Dew Sharman (VHP), Xiabao Zheng (PL), Jennifer Vreedzaam (NDP), Mahinder Jogi (VHP), Ivanildo Plein (NPS) and Ebu Jones (NDP). With only three seats out of seven, the ruling NDP does not hold a majority on the committee, leaving the final outcome dependent on cross-party support.

    Current indicators suggest there is already broad enough backing within the legislature to approve the prosecution’s request. Both the VHP and NPS have publicly stated their support for allowing the courts to hear the case against the three former officials. Notably, Bronto Somohardjo, one of the three ex-ministers targeted, has openly stated he welcomes the indictment, as he wants the chance to defend himself in open court. He also confirmed his own parliamentary faction will back the prosecution’s request.

    The only undecided position so far belongs to PL committee member Xiabao Zheng, whose final stance remains unannounced. Even if Zheng does not support the request, observers note a parliamentary majority is still well within reach, as Somohardjo retains the right to vote on his own case as a sitting member of DNA. Beyond the VHP, most NPS legislators and the ABOP party have also publicly expressed support for Paragsingh’s request.

    It is important to note that a positive vote from DNA would not automatically mean a guilty verdict for the three former ministers. The assembly’s decision only clears the path for formal criminal prosecution, after which the Court of Justice will review the full facts of the case and issue a final ruling on guilt or innocence. That final judgment rests exclusively with the court, not the prosecution or the national legislature.

    With the June 9 deadline fast approaching, DNA is expected to clarify the next steps for the high-profile procedure against the three former office holders in the coming days. As of now, no internal caucus meeting to consider the committee’s final report has yet been scheduled.