分类: politics

  • The Gamboa Question

    The Gamboa Question

    A growing political controversy has taken hold in Belize’s public service sector, after the country’s Ministry of Transport put forward a recommendation to release serving Police Corporal Jhawn Gamboa from the Belize Police Department so he can take up a senior role within the transport ministry. The debate has centered on allegations of nepotism, with critics questioning whether Gamboa’s selection for the position was rooted in professional qualification or improper familial influence.

    At the heart of the dispute is a formal recommendation letter signed by Chester Williams, Chief Executive Officer of the Ministry of Transport. Critics have pointed to the personal connection between Gamboa’s family and Williams, raising questions about whether the hiring process deviated from standard merit-based protocols to benefit the young police officer.

    Gamboa’s father, Superintendent Aaron Gamboa, a senior ranking officer in the Belize Police Department, has forcefully pushed back against all claims of preferential treatment for his son. In his defense of the appointment, the superintendent laid out a detailed record of Jhawn Gamboa’s professional and academic qualifications to prove he earned the position through his own capabilities.

    According to Superintendent Gamboa, Jhawn Gamboa has compiled an impressive record of achievement throughout his training and early career. He completed his mandatory police recruit training and graduated at the top of his class, earning the prestigious Recruit Baton of Honour. Academically, he holds both an associate degree in English and a completed bachelor’s degree, and has also undergone formal military training to expand his professional skill set. Most notably, Superintendent Gamboa confirmed that his son scored 96 percent during the official interview for the senior ministry position, a result that he says speaks to his son’s readiness for the role.

    The senior officer stressed that every step of Jhawn Gamboa’s career so far has been driven by performance, not personal connections. He also addressed the specific allegations surrounding CEO Chester Williams’ influence, pointing out that Williams served for years as Commissioner of Police, and never promoted Jhawn Gamboa during his tenure. Instead, Superintendent Gamboa explained, Jhawn Gamboa earned his promotion to the rank of corporal under current Commissioner Dr. Richard Rosado, only after passing all required promotional examinations in full compliance with department policy.

  • Cabinet Secretary Linked to Company Paid by Ministry of Defence

    Cabinet Secretary Linked to Company Paid by Ministry of Defence

    A growing procurement scandal within Belize’s Ministry of Defence has pulled another high-ranking government official into public scrutiny, just weeks after initial questions emerged about the department’s questionable contracting practices.

    As of July 17, 2026, local independent outlet News Five has verified that Stuart Leslie, the country’s sitting Cabinet Secretary, holds a director position at RSL Group Limited – a private firm that collected more than $85,000 in payments from the Ministry of Defence (MOD) across May and June of this year. The company is one of dozens of entities named in a cache of leaked procurement documents that are now at the center of a growing probe into the MOD’s spending practices.

    The most alarming detail unearthed by News Five’s investigation centers on a pattern of intentional invoice splitting designed to evade official procurement oversight. Belize’s public procurement rules require competitive bidding for any contract valued above $10,000, but documents show RSL Group received seven identical payments of $6,941 all issued on June 4, a structure that deliberately keeps each transaction below the mandatory bidding threshold. On top of these seven payments, a separate pending payout to the firm exceeds $49,000, bringing the total committed amount to well over $100,000.

    Sales orders obtained by the outlet confirm that RSL Group’s contracted work for the Belize Defence Force consisted solely of supplying a variety of food seasonings – a basic, low-value good that critics say should have been sourced through standard, transparent competitive processes.

    When reached for comment on the allegations, Leslie did not deny his formal connection to RSL Group. He pushed back against claims of wrongdoing, however, emphasizing that he plays no role in the company’s daily business operations. The Cabinet Secretary also rejected all assertions that he leveraged his senior government position to sway the MOD’s contract awarding process in the firm’s favor.

    Per Leslie’s account, RSL Group initially participated in the open public procurement process for the seasoning supply contract but was not selected. He claims the MOD later reached out to the company directly to request the goods, after the originally awarded contractor was unable to fulfill the order. Leslie added that RSL Group is a fully legitimate family-owned business, and that he has had personal ties to the owning family for multiple decades.

  • Lyndeon George-Bellamy appointed as Chief of Protocol

    Lyndeon George-Bellamy appointed as Chief of Protocol

    Grenada’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Export Development has made a key senior diplomatic appointment, announcing that Lyndeon George-Bellamy will take up the post of Chief of Protocol starting June 1, 2026.

    George-Bellamy arrives at the role with an extensive 15-plus-year career spanning leadership and executive management across multiple complementary sectors, including hospitality management, large-scale event coordination, strategic communications, diplomatic protocol, and cross-sector stakeholder engagement. Throughout her professional trajectory, she has consistently built a reputation for upholding rigorous standards of excellence, delivering forward-thinking strategic leadership, and prioritizing high-impact public service delivery.

    In her new capacity as Chief of Protocol, George-Bellamy will assume responsibility for all core matters related to diplomatic protocol for the Grenadian government. Her key duties will include coordinating official state visits and high-level diplomatic engagements, supporting ongoing constructive relations between the government and the resident diplomatic corps based in Grenada, and guaranteeing that all official government ceremonies and international events align with long-established diplomatic norms and globally recognized best practices.

    Before accepting this new appointment, George-Bellamy served as a Communications and Stakeholder Engagement Specialist across two government ministries: the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Legal Affairs, Labour and Consumer Affairs. In that role, she successfully strengthened critical partnerships with key internal and external stakeholders, and led innovative public engagement initiatives that significantly boosted both the visibility and community outreach capacity of the ministries.

    Prior to her work in government, George-Bellamy spent more than a decade working in the private sector as an Entity Manager for the Mango Bay Group of Companies, specifically at its subsidiary Island Caterers Ltd. In that position, she oversaw multi-site daily operations, led cross-departmental teams, and consistently delivered premium-tier services to government officials, corporate clients, and high-profile international visitors to Grenada.

    George-Bellamy boasts an impressive academic and professional credential background. She holds a Master of Science degree in Business Management, with a concentration in Marketing and Sales, from Edinburgh Napier University, an Executive Diploma in General Management from The University of the West Indies, and a Diploma in Human Resource Management from the Barbados Institute of Management and Productivity. She has also completed targeted specialized professional development training in core areas relevant to her new role, including Bilateral Diplomacy, Protocol and Official Etiquette, Corporate Governance, Human Resource Management, Labour and Administrative Law, and Digital Marketing.

    In a formal statement following the announcement, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Export Development extended official congratulations to George-Bellamy on her appointment, and expressed confidence in her ability to excel in the new role. The ministry also noted it looks forward to George-Bellamy’s continued contributions to advancing Grenada’s core foreign policy goals and strengthening the country’s diplomatic ties with global partners.

    This announcement was shared via official government channels, with NOW Grenada noting it is not responsible for contributor statements or opinions, and invites users to report any abusive content through official reporting channels.

  • Dems question Vineyard estate’s conversion to housing project

    Dems question Vineyard estate’s conversion to housing project

    Barbados’ main opposition Democratic Labour Party (DLP) has launched a scathing critique of the Mia Mottley administration’s latest major infrastructure push, condemning a plan to turn 80 acres of fertile agricultural land in the parish of St. Philip’s Vineyard district into one of the country’s largest affordable housing developments. The rebuke comes just days after the government and private sector partners formally broke ground on the joint venture between the state-owned National Housing Corporation (NHC) and private firm Vineyard Development Inc., which aims to deliver roughly 1,100 residential units over the next five to six years, with entry-level house-and-land packages priced starting at $170,000 Barbadian dollars.

    In an official public statement released Thursday, Amoy Gilding-Bourne, the DLP’s spokesperson on agriculture and national food security, framed the initiative as a major step backward for Barbados’ struggling agricultural sector. “It is deeply alarming that this administration continues to trade irreplaceable prime farmland for residential development,” Gilding-Bourne said, noting that the 80-acre site marked one of the largest recent conversions of agricultural land to non-farming use on the island.

    Gilding-Bourne first challenged the government’s justification for the new project, pointing to a backlog of stalled and unfinished public housing developments across the country, including multiple phases of the Hope Housing initiative in Dodds, Cliffden Hill, and Brighton. She argued that the administration owes Barbadian citizens a full accounting for these uncompleted projects, and for millions in taxpayer funds that have already been allocated without delivering finished homes. “Before breaking ground on another massive residential development, the government owes every Barbadian a clear explanation for these unfinished projects and the millions of taxpayer dollars already squandered,” she emphasized.

    Beyond the backlog of existing housing work, the opposition spokesperson disputed the government’s labeling of the development as “affordable housing,” arguing that the $170,000 starting price puts the units out of reach for the low-income and working-class households that are most in need of subsidized housing. Amid sustained high inflation, stagnant wage growth, and a rapidly rising cost of living across the Caribbean island, Gilding-Bourne noted that even the cheapest available units in the new development would be inaccessible to many vulnerable families, effectively locking out the very group the project claims to serve. “Housing starting at $170,000 simply cannot be described as affordable for many working-class families struggling under the weight of rising inflation, stagnant wages, and an ever-increasing cost of living,” she said.

    The most significant criticism, however, centers on the project’s direct threat to Barbados’ long-stated national goal of improving food security. Gilding-Bourne argued that the conversion of 80 acres of prime farmland directly contradicts the government’s public commitments to boosting local food production and reducing reliance on costly, carbon-intensive imported food. “If we do not produce, we will perish,” she said, adding that every acre of fertile agricultural land lost to development erodes the island’s ability to feed its own population and makes it more vulnerable to global food price shocks. “Food security cannot be achieved while reducing the very land base upon which local food production depends. Every acre of fertile agricultural land lost to housing or commercial development weakens Barbados’ ability to feed itself.”

    Gilding-Bourne also took aim at the Ministry of Agriculture, accusing the department of prioritizing flashy public relations over tangible, practical support for local farmers. She highlighted ongoing unresolved issues across the sector, including inadequate irrigation infrastructure, unfair competition from cheap imported pork, and a persistent lack of progress on key government-backed agricultural initiatives.

    The DLP is now demanding full transparency around the public-private partnership structure of the housing development. The party has raised a series of unanswered questions, including whether the arrangement received required parliamentary approval, how the public land contribution was independently valued, whether the property will be transferred to a special purpose private vehicle, and what legal and financial safeguards are in place to guarantee that taxpayers receive fair full value for the public land asset being used for the project.

    Additionally, Gilding-Bourne called on the administration to release public updates on a handful of stalled or underperforming government agricultural programs, including the prison farming initiative, the Black Belly sheep genetic improvement program, the imported heifers livestock project, and the newly legalized medicinal cannabis industry.

    “Barbadians deserve clear answers, measurable outcomes, and responsible stewardship of our national resources,” Gilding-Bourne said. She closed by emphasizing that meaningful progress on national food security “requires vision, planning, investment, and above all, the protection of the finite agricultural lands upon which our nation’s future depends.”

  • “St. Kitts and Nevis Will Not Be Exposed To Criminals” – Prime Minister Drew

    “St. Kitts and Nevis Will Not Be Exposed To Criminals” – Prime Minister Drew

    St. Kitts and Nevis Prime Minister Dr. Terrance Drew has moved to ease public anxiety over the country’s bilateral migration cooperation arrangement with the United States, emphasizing that rigorous multi-layered screening protocols are in place to block any individuals with criminal backgrounds from entering the federation.

    The Prime Minister addressed widespread public questions about the transfer program during his monthly Prime Minister’s Round Table briefing held July 16, clarifying key details of the agreement that applies to all Caribbean Community (CARICOM) member state nationals. He stressed that St. Kitts and Nevis retains full, unilateral authority to reject any individual who fails to meet the country’s strict national security requirements, upholding the small island nation’s sovereign decision-making power over its borders.

    Dr. Drew confirmed that earlier this year, the federal government finalized arrangements to accept three CARICOM nationals being transferred from U.S. custody, a transfer first formally announced by the government in May 2026. He pushed back against circulating public speculation that the transferred individuals had been convicted of crimes, explaining that their removal from the U.S. was tied exclusively to civil immigration violations, not criminal convictions.

    Before any transfer is approved, every individual undergoes a full, multi-agency assessment covering criminal background checks, immigration eligibility, medical screenings and national security vetting, the Prime Minister explained. U.S. authorities share all available biographical, medical and criminal history data with St. Kitts and Nevis’ national security, immigration and law enforcement teams ahead of any planned transfer, to allow for a full review. The existing memorandum of understanding governing the arrangement explicitly prohibits the transfer of any individual convicted of violent felonies or sexual offenses, eliminating the risk of such individuals entering the country.

    “These are not criminals. We have no reason to lock them up or anything like that,” Dr. Drew told attendees of the briefing. He added that if post-transfer information emerges that shows an individual does not meet the agreement’s eligibility terms, the federal government is prepared to take immediate and appropriate action to protect public safety. “There will be measures taken to ensure that St. Kitts and Nevis is not exposed to any criminals,” he reaffirmed.

    The Prime Minister also noted that the International Organization for Migration (IOM) has played a key independent role in the transfer process, providing third-party oversight to confirm all proceedings align with international law, global humanitarian standards and protections for the human rights of transferred individuals.

    On the topic of program costs, Dr. Drew clarified that all expenses related to transferred individuals – including housing, food, clothing, healthcare and other basic essential needs – are covered outside of the St. Kitts and Nevis government budget. “I can say broadly that one, it didn’t cost St. Kitts and Nevis one cent, and two, we made sure that the basics were covered for these people,” he said. Cost assessments are conducted on a case-by-case basis to account for varying individual needs.

    Dr. Drew framed the transfer program as a measured effort to balance the country’s international and regional cooperation obligations with its core legal duty to protect the domestic security and national interests of St. Kitts and Nevis. He closed by offering a public assurance that the government will maintain full transparency around the arrangement, and will continue to apply the same strict immigration, security and law enforcement procedures to every individual considered for transfer under the bilateral agreement.

  • What Saint Lucia’s laws actually say about non-consensual intimate photos

    What Saint Lucia’s laws actually say about non-consensual intimate photos

    A growing wave of cases involving the unauthorized distribution of adults’ private intimate images has thrown a spotlight on critical gaps in Saint Lucia’s existing legal framework, reigniting public debate over what conduct qualifies as illegal under current national law. A comprehensive review of the island nation’s legislation confirms that while some existing laws can be applied in limited circumstances, there are no standalone statutes that directly criminalize the non-consensual capture or distribution of private sexual images, including voyeuristic shots and upskirting photographs.

    An anonymous local lawyer who spoke to local media outlet St Lucia Times while assessing a recent high-profile incident outlined that victims may still pursue limited legal recourse through three existing pieces of legislation: the country’s Criminal Code, the 2019 Computer Misuse Act, and national data protection laws. These statutes do impose potential criminal and civil penalties for parties that publish identifiable private images in specific scenarios, but none address the core offense of non-consensual intimate image sharing directly.

    Under Saint Lucia’s Criminal Code, protection is restricted to a narrow subset of pornographic material. The law only bans the public sale of obscene content when that material is deemed likely to corrupt the morals of minors, leaving most non-consensual adult image sharing cases outside this scope. The code does criminalize harassment, threats, and abuse, meaning if the distribution of private images causes substantial distress or harassment to a victim, that specific conduct can be prosecuted. Provisions covering blackmail and stalking may also apply if the image misuse is tied to a pattern of surveillance or threats against the victim. However, the lawyer notes that these applications require prosecutors to prove specific criminal intent on the part of the offender to secure a conviction.

    Enacted in 2019, the Computer Misuse Act prohibits using digital systems to share obscene or indecent material when the act is carried out recklessly or with the goal of inflicting distress, anxiety, annoyance, or inconvenience on another person. Convictions under this provision carry a maximum penalty of a $10,000 fine or three months of imprisonment, with both penalties doubled for repeat offenses. While the act explicitly criminalizes indecent images of children, it fails to create a general criminal offense for violations of adult privacy related to intimate imagery. For victims pursuing a case under this law, the burden falls squarely on the complainant to prove they experienced the legally required level of harm to win a conviction, the lawyer explained.

    Saint Lucia’s data protection legislation was originally drafted to regulate how commercial entities and government agencies handle personal information, including personally identifiable photographs. While the law does penalize the unauthorized disclosure of personal data by parties that access or hold that information without permission, it does not specifically criminalize non-consensual intimate image capture, voyeurism, or upskirting.

    Compared to neighboring Caribbean nations, Saint Lucia has not updated its legislation to address this growing issue. Trinidad and Tobago, for example, amended its Sexual Offences Act in 2024 to explicitly add voyeurism, upskirting, and non-consensual intimate image sharing to the list of criminal offenses. The anonymous lawyer argues that Saint Lucia’s current laws leave critical gaps that require urgent legislative amendment. “There is much scope for amending the legislation to canvass the offence specifically,” the lawyer stated, adding that the optimal legal reform would create an offense of strict liability, which would remove the burden on victims to prove harm or distress and allow conviction simply based on proof that the images were distributed without consent.

    Under the current framework, the lawyer concluded, victims of non-consensual image sharing have only limited avenues to hold offenders accountable, requiring them to meet strict evidentiary requirements for harm tied to existing legislation to secure any conviction.

  • OPINION: Why I Refuse to Remain Quiet

    OPINION: Why I Refuse to Remain Quiet

    Forty-four years after Antigua and Barbuda secured its independence in 1981, a long-time local resident and patriotic citizen has opened up about his deep disappointment with the trajectory of national development, calling out a long list of harmful government policies that have eroded the rights and livelihoods of native-born Antiguans and Barbudans.

    Looking back to the months immediately following independence, the author, Yves R. Ephraim, recalls how government officials visited his fifth-form class to recruit young people to join the national building effort. At that time, severe brain drain was already hollowing out the country’s talent pool, a trend that has only worsened over the decades: today, barely a handful of Ephraim’s former classmates still reside in the twin-island nation. To encourage young people to stay and serve, officials offered full engineering scholarships to students who would commit to working at the Antigua Public Utilities Authority (APUA) and the Public Works Department after graduation. Three of his classmates took the offer, completed their degrees, and went on to hold senior leadership roles in those two public entities.

    Ephraim himself chose a different path. Even as a teenager, he had no interest in public sector work, and turned down the scholarship to pursue his passion for electronics at one of two local private firms that offered specialized training in the field. Despite rejecting public service, he remained deeply committed to the nation he loved. Born the first child of a struggling single mother facing significant economic hardship, he had few opportunities, but he made a vow to stay in his homeland, contribute to its growth, and prove that Antigua and Barbuda’s native talent could compete with the best minds across the globe. For decades, he has persisted through systemic barriers created by bad government policy, holding onto hope that meaningful change would come during his lifetime.

    It was the government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic that pushed Ephraim to speak out publicly. It was during this public health crisis that he came to believe the current administration did not value the lives and rights of native Antiguans and Barbudans. He condemns the government’s forced COVID-19 vaccine mandate, which threatened to terminate the employment of public servants who refused to take what he describes as an experimental drug, stripping them of their right to work. In his view, this mandate amounted to a crime against humanity, implemented solely to reach an 80% vaccination target to prop up the country’s key tourism industry—even though the shot never prevented viral transmission, as the government had promised. Ephraim shares a personal example of the harm caused: one of his own employees suffered permanent, life-altering side effects after following the government’s public encouragement to get vaccinated. He argues that the drug caused far more harm than good, and that his greatest fear during the pandemic was not the virus itself, but the government’s seizure of extraordinary powers that eroded basic civil liberties under the guise of public safety.

    In the years following the pandemic, Ephraim argues, a string of increasingly harmful government policies have turned the nation into what he calls a “neo-plantation,” stripping native citizens of their national identity, private property rights, and ability to build secure lives in their own homeland. He outlines 15 key grievances against the current administration, ranging from long-running infrastructure failures to dangerous concessions of national sovereignty.

    Among the most serious issues are the degradation of the country’s telecommunications infrastructure after the government confiscated spectrum rights from major providers Digicel and Flow, leaving Antigua and Barbuda with the highest per-bandwidth prices in the entire Caribbean region. He also criticizes the creation of a special economic zone in the country’s northeastern corridor that ceded national sovereignty without including any performance requirements or guarantees of economic benefits for local citizens. On Barbuda, he accuses the government of marginalizing native Barbudans and seizing their communal land to hand over to wealthy foreign investors. National legislation has also been amended to make it far easier for the government to seize private property from citizens, a policy Ephraim describes as unprecedented official theft that has become the administration’s default approach to governance.

    Other long-running failures include the botched response to the country’s chronic water crisis: 14 years ago, the government promised to fix the crisis in just 14 days, and has spent hundreds of millions of dollars to date, only to recently acknowledge that the core problem all along was outdated pipes that needed replacement. The country has also lost visa-free access to the United States for travel and education, a blow that has upended the lives of many Antiguans and Barbudans seeking medical care and academic opportunities, despite previous government assurances this outcome was impossible. Violent crime and petty theft have surged, including an epidemic of car tire theft that authorities have failed to curb, while underfunding has left both the police service and the national justice system unable to function effectively, eroding public trust in institutions.

    Ephraim also condemns the government’s policy of accepting deportees from third countries, a move he says contradicts the national interest and risks long-term destabilization. Most recently, the administration moved within 30 days of winning re-election to make Spanish an official language, and created a special desk in the Prime Minister’s office exclusively for Dominican Republic nationals, a step that formalizes the long-standing marginalization of native Antiguans and Barbudans in their own country. Proposed expansions of the Windfall Tax would hit struggling local businesses and push up prices for working households, effectively erasing any gains from recent minimum wage increases. The government has also made amnesty for undocumented immigrants a top priority, and is now considering using $50 million in unclaimed bank deposits to launch another national airline—after the failure of Antigua Airways—rather than directing the funds to fix the public hospital, boost police resourcing, or roll back the unpopular expanded Windfall Tax.

    As a native-born citizen who has spent his entire life working to contribute to Antigua and Barbuda’s development, Ephraim says he no longer believes the current government is willing to create an enabling environment that protects his core rights: the right to private property, the right to national identity, the right to live safely in his homeland, and the freedom to thrive without unnecessary government interference. Echoing the words of beloved Antiguan artist King Short Shirt, also a native of Ephraim’s home district, he declares: “nobody go run me from whey me come from!”

  • Brede steun voor ‘Kaalplukwet’; DNA vraagt aandacht voor rechtsbescherming en uitvoering

    Brede steun voor ‘Kaalplukwet’; DNA vraagt aandacht voor rechtsbescherming en uitvoering

    On July 17, Suriname’s National Assembly launched the first round of parliamentary debate for a landmark private member’s bill focused on seizing unlawfully obtained assets, widely known locally as the ‘Kaalplukwet’. While cross-party lawmakers have broadly backed the legislation’s core goal of stripping organized criminals of illicit wealth, the bill has sparked detailed discussions over legal safeguards, procedural fairness and implementation capacity, with debate set to resume next week.

    Leading the proceedings as chair of the parliamentary rapporteur committee, Ingrid Karta-Bink of the National Democratic Party (NDP) presented the committee’s report on the bill. She emphasized that the bill’s foundational principle is that crime should not pay, requiring that all illegally gained assets can be seized regardless of their location, whether held domestically or abroad. The committee collected expert input from multiple key bodies, including Suriname’s High Court of Justice, Public Prosecution Service (OM), Central Bank of Suriname, and the Suriname Business Association, among other specialized institutions. Though the High Court and OM preferred integrating the new asset forfeiture rules into a full-scale revision of the country’s criminal code, parliamentary leaders opted for a standalone specialized law to put a modern, effective asset seizure tool in place far faster to address growing criminal activity.

    Krishna Mathoera, representing the Progressive People’s Party (VHP), acknowledged that cracking down on transnational organized crime is an urgent priority for Suriname, but stressed that the rule of law must remain the central guiding principle throughout the drafting and implementation process. She called on the bill’s sponsors to clarify how the new legislation aligns with existing provisions in Suriname’s existing Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure. Mathoera also highlighted a series of outstanding concerns: the reversed burden of proof laid out in the bill, expanded powers granted to the Public Prosecution Service, protections for third-party assets, and whether police, prosecution and judicial bodies have enough trained staff and resources to conduct complex financial investigations. She also noted that the bill must include clear provisions to effectively track and seize modern assets including cryptocurrency, a gap in current legislation.

    Fellow NDP lawmaker Jennifer Vreedzaam added that the bill must be applied with extreme care, and that protection of fundamental legal rights must be guaranteed at every stage. She argued that asset forfeiture measures must not devolve into an extra, arbitrary punishment for defendants, and should only serve the sole purpose of stripping illicit gains. Vreedzaam raised questions around the specific role of the investigating judge, the implementation capacity of the OM and judiciary, and the need for clearly defined procedural rules to prevent arbitrary application of the law.

    BEP party lawmaker Ronny Asabina described the bill as a critical new tool in the fight against organized crime, but warned that core fundamental rights must not be sidelined to speed up asset seizures. He raised specific concerns over the reversed burden of proof, and called for clearer protections for third parties, including family members and business associates who may be inadvertently drawn into asset forfeiture investigations. Asabina also pushed for increased investment in specialized training for police and prosecution staff, and called for specific safeguards for indigenous and tribal communities to prevent asset seizure from disrupting traditional land rights.

    VHP representative Cheryll Dijksteel focused on Suriname’s international obligations to counter money laundering and terrorist financing. She stated that the bill must align with global regulatory standards, while also being carefully integrated with existing national legislation to avoid legal conflict. Dijksteel pointed to the risk of overlapping provisions with existing criminal code rules, and called for a mandatory effectiveness and implementation review of the law a few years after it enters into force.

    Steven Reyme from the A20 party noted that prison sentences alone fail to deter organized crime, as defendants often retain access to their illicit assets even after completing their sentences. He argued that the new bill consolidates scattered existing asset forfeiture provisions into a clear, unified framework, and better addresses modern forms of financial crime that existing rules were not designed to tackle. Reyme expressed appreciation for the bill’s sponsors, who incorporated feedback from a wide range of expert institutions during the drafting process. That said, he stressed that the bill can only deliver on its goals if implementing agencies have sufficient resources: trained financial investigators, specialized prosecutors, expert judges, and modern investigative tools. He also called for strengthened legal protections for whistleblowers to help expose illicit hidden assets.

    Rossellie Cotino, another member of the rapporteur committee, did not speak during the opening round of debate. After committee members concluded their opening contributions, VHP lawmaker Asis Gajadien became the first non-committee lawmaker to address the chamber. Gajadien confirmed that his parliamentary faction also supports the core principle of seizing all unlawfully obtained assets, but argued that the biggest challenge to effective asset forfeiture is not a lack of legislation, but gaps in on-the-ground implementation. He asked the bill’s sponsors to clarify what specific problem the new legislation addresses that cannot already be resolved under existing laws, and emphasized that strong institutions, a well-functioning Tax Administration, an effective Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), and improved cross-agency cooperation are all critical preconditions for success. Without these foundational elements in place, Gajadien warned, the law will deliver far less impact in practice than its supporters promise.

    The private member’s bill was originally submitted to the National Assembly on December 10, 2025 by NDP lawmaker Ebu Jones and NPS lawmaker Ivanildo Plein.

  • Benjamin Says Government Will Continue Investing in Police Technology and Training

    Benjamin Says Government Will Continue Investing in Police Technology and Training

    Against a backdrop of rapidly evolving criminal tactics that leverage cutting-edge technology, the government of Antigua and Barbuda has made a public commitment to sustained investment in law enforcement modernization. Attorney General Sir Steadroy Benjamin outlined the ambitious upgrade strategy during the high-profile 50th graduation ceremony of the Royal Police Force of Antigua and Barbuda’s Recruit Training Course on Thursday, emphasizing that modern policing demands far more than traditional enforcement skills.

    Criminal networks have grown increasingly sophisticated in recent years, shifting toward complex digital and transnational schemes that outpace outdated law enforcement frameworks. Benjamin stressed that to outmaneuver these adaptive threats, policing agencies must prioritize continuous upskilling, technological innovation and cross-sector collaboration to stay one step ahead of bad actors.

    To date, the administration has already delivered substantial tangible progress in modernizing the Royal Police Force, rolling out upgrades across multiple core capabilities. Key improvements include expanded surveillance infrastructure, enhanced specialist investigative tools, and the growth of the police canine unit—officers now have working dogs trained to detect firearms, explosives, and illicit narcotics.

    Regional and international partnerships have been central to the modernization push, Benjamin confirmed. Through collaborative efforts between CARICOM IMPACS and the U.S. Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, the force has acquired the advanced Integrated Ballistic Identification System (IBIS) and specialized bullet recovery equipment, alongside significant upgrades to its drone operations unit.

    Beyond hardware and infrastructure, the government has also invested heavily in specialized professional development for serving officers. Dozens of personnel have already completed targeted training programs in high-demand areas, including advanced radio communications, unmanned aerial system operation, and white-collar and financial crime investigation.

    All these upgrades are designed to lift overall service quality and equip the entire force to respond effectively to shifting national security risks, Benjamin explained. “These are all welcoming ways to help sharpen the skills of our officers so that we can provide better quality service to the public,” he said.

    Looking ahead, the government remains firmly committed to expanding and refreshing the police force through ongoing recruitment and training cycles. Preparations are already advancing for the next intake of new recruits, with the administration calling for dedicated, service-oriented men and women to join the force’s ranks.

    In closing remarks to the newly graduated recruit cohort, Benjamin noted that while technology and specialized training form a critical foundation for modern policing, retaining public trust depends ultimately on the individual conduct of officers. He urged the new graduates to uphold the highest standards of professionalism, personal integrity, and unwavering commitment to serving the people of Antigua and Barbuda throughout their careers.

  • Jeffers Announces New Police Recruitment Drive, Urges Public-Spirited Men and Women to Apply

    Jeffers Announces New Police Recruitment Drive, Urges Public-Spirited Men and Women to Apply

    At the Sir Wright F. George Police Academy’s graduation ceremony for its milestone 50th Recruit Training Course, Royal Police Force of Antigua and Barbuda Commissioner Everton Jeffers made a key announcement: recruitment for the force’s next incoming class of officers is already officially open, and he is calling on public-spirited citizens across the nation to step forward and apply.

    The event marked a major milestone for the local police training system, as 43 dedicated recruits successfully completed the rigorous six-month training curriculum and were formally sworn into the force. This graduating cohort achieved an impressive overall pass rate of 95.6 percent, a result that reflects the high standards of the academy’s training programs.

    As the newly minted officers prepare to begin their frontline careers serving communities across Antigua and Barbuda, Jeffers emphasized that the force is already planning ahead for its next generation of law enforcement professionals. “As we continue to refine and improve our public safety services, we are already looking forward to our next graduation of officers, now that the recruitment process has kicked off,” Jeffers stated during his address to the graduating class. “We have always sought outstanding men and women who feel a genuine calling to serve their country.”

    The commissioner outlined the core qualities the force prioritizes in new applicants, stressing that modern policing is a mission of public service, not just a traditional nine-to-five job. “As your Commissioner, I want to make this clear: policing is far more than an eight-hour shift. It is not a role for people who only count down the clock to the end of their workday or those who are only here for a paycheck,” Jeffers told the graduates. “Today, you are not just walking away with a certificate of course completion. You are accepting a sacred responsibility placed in your hands by the public.”

    New recruits must be prepared to uphold the highest professional ethical standards at all times, Jeffers explained, and work consistently to earn and retain the trust of the communities they serve. “We need people who have the inherent qualities to excel as police officers: dependable, respectful, polite, and empathetic to the needs of all community members,” he said. He added that officers must also be able to maintain calm and professional composure in high-pressure situations, acting as respectful ambassadors for the force even when facing adversity. The attitude and conduct of serving officers, he noted, should always reflect the rigorous, high-quality training they received at the police academy.

    Beyond attracting the right candidates, Jeffers highlighted the ongoing modernization efforts underway across the Royal Police Force. The organization is investing heavily in updated infrastructure, cutting-edge technology, and specialized training to boost its operational capacity. Key upgrades include expanding specialized K-9 units trained to detect firearms, explosives, and illegal narcotics; acquiring a modern ballistic identification system to support criminal investigations; and delivering advanced training in areas including radio communications, unmanned aerial system operations, and white-collar crime investigation.

    While these technological and operational advances are critical to improving public safety outcomes, Jeffers emphasized that the force’s long-term success ultimately depends on the quality and commitment of its people. The force will only thrive if it continues to attract candidates dedicated to serving Antigua and Barbuda with unwavering integrity and professional conduct.

    “We will keep pushing for excellence in every aspect of our work, every step of the way,” Jeffers said. “Our core goal is to remain an inclusive organization that works hand-in-hand with the public and the communities we are sworn to protect.”