分类: politics

  • Dominican Republic : The Dominican military industry is booming

    Dominican Republic : The Dominican military industry is booming

    Shared between Haiti and the Dominican Republic, a 392-kilometer land border cuts across varied terrain, from winding river corridors to paved international highways. Of this boundary, 172 kilometers run along four major waterways—the Massacre, Artibonite, Libón, and Pedernales rivers—while 48 kilometers are made up of cross-border trading routes, with four official entry points at Dajabón, Elías Piña, Jimaní, and Pedernales that anchor critical bilateral commerce and binational market activity. In recent years, the Dominican government has prioritized upgrading border control, launching an ambitious infrastructure project that has become a cornerstone of its national security strategy, even as its domestic military industrial sector grows at an unexpected pace.

    At the core of the border upgrade is a continuous perimeter barrier combining reinforced concrete foundations, reinforced metal fencing, and dedicated paved patrol lanes that let security forces respond to incursions rapidly. Complementing the physical barrier are elevated watchtowers staffed around the clock, plus a cutting-edge fiber-optic communications network that transmits real-time voice and high-resolution image data across the entire border surveillance system. Dominican Defense Minister Lieutenant General Carlos Antonio Fernández Onofre outlined that the perimeter infrastructure is being targeted at the border’s most strategically vulnerable points, with an expanding synchronized network of autonomous drones and fixed surveillance cameras being rolled out incrementally to match evolving security needs.

    Early results from the infrastructure buildout have already exceeded expectations, according to Fernández Onofre. Areas that once faced persistent crime, including rampant theft of cattle, motorcycles, and vehicles, have seen these illegal activities virtually eliminated since the new security systems went online. Beyond ground-based infrastructure, the upgrade has leveraged the Dominican Republic’s growing domestic military industry, most notably the TP-75 DULUS—the first domestically assembled surveillance aircraft built by national producers, specifically designed for border reconnaissance and airborne monitoring.

    Fernández Onofre emphasized that the locally built aircraft has drastically improved coordination between Dominican air and ground security units, delivering timely, actionable intelligence to support defense and counter-smuggling operations along the entire boundary. A key advantage of the TP-75 DULUS is its low operational cost: the plane can complete a full patrol of the entire land border in just four hours when taking off from the San Isidro Airbase, regardless of whether it departs for the northern or southern segment of the border, at a total cost of just 2,000 Dominican pesos, equal to less than 7 gallons of high-octane SP95 fuel per flight hour.

    The TP-75 DULUS is not an isolated achievement for the Dominican military industrial sector. The country already produces its own FURIA armored personnel vehicles for domestic security use, and Fernández Onofre confirmed that domestic manufacturing of surveillance drones is set to launch in the near future, expanding the country’s self-sufficiency in defense technology.

    Border security efforts extend far beyond the land boundary, however. The Dominican Navy has significantly upgraded its maritime surveillance capabilities at both the northern and southern maritime ends of the Haiti-Dominican border, with patrol missions focused on protecting national sovereignty, cracking down on a range of illicit activities including illegal unregulated fishing, smuggling of contraband, and human trafficking, as well as conducting search and rescue operations to preserve life at sea—all of which contribute to broader stability in the border region.

    Fernández Onofre confirmed that maritime patrol intensity will continue to increase as new vessels ordered by the Dominican government are commissioned into service. “We have already reinforced patrols along both the northern and southern maritime borders with Dominican Navy vessels, and this buildout will continue as all ordered patrol units are delivered and brought into active service,” he said. Most recently, the Dominican Republic signed a new agreement this year with Portugal to acquire four new offshore patrol vessels, which will further expand the Navy’s operational reach in both territorial waters and international maritime border zones, cementing the country’s improved border security posture. As domestic military production expands, the country is moving closer to full self-sufficiency in core defense technologies for border protection.

  • Motorists Urged to Conserve Fuel as International Prices Rise

    Motorists Urged to Conserve Fuel as International Prices Rise

    Antigua and Barbuda’s Prime Minister Gaston Browne is calling on motorists across the twin-island nation to cut back on non-essential fuel use, as skyrocketing international petroleum prices loom to push pump costs even higher for local consumers.

    Speaking during the weekly Browne and Browne Show on Saturday, Browne delivered a clear warning: the government has hit the ceiling of what it can do to shield citizens from rising costs, after years of absorbing the gap between global price spikes and local retail rates.

    “We are asking our people to be a little more conservative,” Browne stated, urging drivers to use fuel responsibly and cut down on unnecessary trips to reduce demand.

    His public appeal comes just after the government implemented a EC$2 per gallon increase on both gasoline and diesel earlier this month. The prime minister explained that the price adjustment was unavoidable: it was needed to cover ballooning import costs and stop the country’s existing fuel subsidy program from growing even more costly for public finances.

    Browne traced the root of the current crisis to unfolding global events, noting that international crude prices have surged dramatically in recent months driven by persistent geopolitical instability, most notably ongoing tensions involving Iran. The prime minister shared that he closely tracks daily fluctuations in Brent crude, the global benchmark, and that recent upward trends in the international market left the government with no option but to pre-warn residents of coming local price changes.

    “These are not things that we have any control over,” Browne emphasized.

    If global prices continue their upward climb, the prime minister confirmed that consumers will almost certainly face additional pump price hikes in the near future. “We have absolutely no choice but to continue to increase the price of petroleum products,” he said.

    Even with the recent adjustments, Browne argued that fuel prices in Antigua and Barbuda still rank among the lowest in the entire Caribbean, a notable feat given the country produces no crude oil of its own. He attributed this to intentional, costly government intervention designed to buffer households and local businesses from the full brunt of global price swings.

    To keep prices low, the government previously scrapped a 15% fuel consumption tax that typically generated roughly EC$4 million in monthly public revenue. It has also transferred millions of dollars directly to the West Indies Oil Company to keep retail pump prices below their actual market value.

    To date, Browne confirmed, these relief measures have cost the national treasury more than EC$40 million, forcing the administration to delay payments on other critical public obligations. Going further, the prime minister disclosed that the government was even forced to take on more than EC$30 million in new borrowing to settle a debt that would have otherwise been paid using regular revenue from the West Indies Oil Company.

    Browne stressed that the government did not fund these consumer protections from surplus cash reserves. Instead, it redirected funding earmarked for other government priorities to keep fuel costs down. “What we did, we robbed Peter to pay Paul,” he summarized.

    While the administration remains committed to offering as much relief as possible to residents, Browne reiterated that the government’s financial capacity is finite. He urged local motorists to adjust their habits and prepare for the very real possibility of further fuel price increases in the coming months.

  • Opposition Leader seeks international intervention in Guyana’s political situation

    Opposition Leader seeks international intervention in Guyana’s political situation

    In a formal five-page memorandum dated September 5, 2026, Azruddin Mohamed, leader of Guyana’s main opposition party Working People’s Alliance (WIN), has issued an urgent appeal for international intervention to address what he frames as escalating unconstitutional state interference targeting his political bloc. The appeal comes on the heels of a series of contentious actions against Mohamed, his staff, and allied elected officials, including arrests, impoundment of personal vehicles, seizure of digital communication devices, and the unexplained removal of his 500,000-follower political platform from Facebook.

    The deep-rooted political friction between Mohamed’s bloc and the ruling People’s Progressive Party Civic (PPPC) government led by President Irfan Ali traces back to 2025, when the United States Treasury Department imposed sanctions on Mohamed, his father Nazar “Shell” Mohamed, and their son Azruddin Mohamed Jr. over allegations of a US$50 million tax evasion scheme tied to the smuggling of more than 10 kilograms of gold. Later that year, a U.S. Grand Jury indicted the trio on charges of wire fraud, mail fraud, and money laundering linked to their gold trading enterprise. The family is currently contesting an extradition request to stand trial in a Florida federal court. Despite repeated public warnings about the Mohameds issued to voters by the PPPC during the 2025 general and regional elections, WIN secured 109,075 votes and 16 parliamentary seats, catapulting the party to the position of official opposition.

    The most recent escalation began last week, when Mohamed and two other opposition figures were taken into custody near President Ali’s official residence in Leonora, West Coast Demerara. Authorities alleged the group was traveling in vehicles with illegally dark tinted windows. Mohamed was eventually released from custody, but law enforcement has retained his personal mobile phone and a laptop belonging to his daughter. Mohamed alleges that during the period his devices were held by police, his official political Facebook page, Team Mohamed’s, was permanently deleted.

    In the memorandum, Mohamed’s office emphasizes that the search and seizure of communication devices belonging to elected representatives carries unique constitutional weight, as these devices regularly store confidential political strategy, privileged legal correspondence, and private communications with constituents. The ability of opposition leaders, parliamentarians, and locally elected regional councillors to carry out their constitutionally mandated roles without intimidation or unlawful state interference is, the brief argues, directly tied to the legitimacy and integrity of Guyana’s entire democratic system.

    At the core of the opposition’s demands for clarification is a critical question: what specific legal authority authorizes the Guyanese state to seize, access, and review the private communications of the country’s duly elected opposition leader. The brief notes that the seized devices hold a wide range of sensitive information, including legally protected attorney-client communications, confidential internal political discussions, correspondence with sitting members of parliament, journalists and ordinary voters, and sensitive materials related to opposition political organizing.

    On the subject of the deleted Facebook page, labeled “a vital political communication outlet” for Mohamed’s movement, the brief outlines that the page remained fully operational until after Mohamed’s devices were taken into state custody, and became inaccessible only while law enforcement held control of his accounts. The circumstances of the page’s disappearance raise urgent red flags about deliberate state interference with opposition political speech, the document argues. At minimum, the opposition is calling for an independent forensic digital investigation to determine whether state actors accessed the account credentials from the seized devices, and whether the page was intentionally disabled or deleted through official action. The brief also demands that all relevant digital evidence be preserved pending the outcome of this probe.

    Beyond these two core issues, the opposition memorandum asks the international community to press the Guyanese government for clarification on three key fronts: the legal foundation for the detention of the opposition leader, elected representatives, and political staff; the legal authority justifying the seizure and ongoing retention of electronic devices belonging to opposition officials; and the chain of custody for all seized items, including an explanation for the disappearance of a regional councillor Nelson’s phone following his release from custody.

    Mohamed’s office stresses that the incidents outlined in the brief should not be dismissed as isolated disputes involving individual politicians. The cumulative effect of these actions, the document argues, raises systemic, serious concerns about the future of political pluralism in Guyana, the impartiality and independence of state institutions, the protection of private political speech, and the ability of the opposition to fulfill its constitutional oversight and representative functions without intimidation or improper interference.

    WIN concludes the memorandum by reaffirming its unwavering commitment to peaceful, constitutional, and democratic political participation, and its mission to protect the right of all Guyanese citizens to exercise their democratic rights free from fear and intimidation. In closing, the brief argues that now is the moment for international democratic partners to act: it is far more effective to address threats to democratic norms before they are damaged beyond repair, rather than intervene after irreversible harm has been done.

  • New disability affairs unit raises questions about role of existing commission in Dominica

    New disability affairs unit raises questions about role of existing commission in Dominica

    A planned government overhaul of Dominica’s disability policy infrastructure has emerged as a widely welcomed step toward more coordinated, effective support for the island’s disabled community, though key stakeholders are pushing for much greater transparency around how the new body will interact with existing institutions.

    At the center of the conversation is the government’s proposal to create a standalone National Disability Affairs Unit, a dedicated administrative body that backers frame as a breakthrough in streamlining fragmented services and policies for persons living with disabilities across the country. But even as supporters applaud the government’s commitment to elevating disability issues to a higher national priority, unresolved questions about the new unit’s relationship to the existing National Commission for Persons with Disabilities have left stakeholders seeking clarity.

    For years, the National Commission has served as the lead advisory and advocacy body advancing disability-focused policy in Dominica. Most recently, the organization wrapped a major full review of the country’s National Action Plan for Persons with Disabilities — a multiphase revision process led by a specially appointed committee within the Commission. After the review was completed, the Commission’s chairperson formally submitted the updated plan to the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Health, Wellness and Persons with Disabilities in 2025.

    With formal plans for the new unit now on the table, one of the most pressing open questions is whether the revised National Action Plan will serve as the foundational policy framework for the new unit’s work, or if the body will reset the policy agenda entirely. Beverly Leblanc, a sitting member of the National Commission, has emerged as a leading voice calling for public clarification on how ongoing work from the Commission will be integrated into the new structure.

    Leblanc emphasized that the creation of the National Disability Affairs Unit should strengthen, rather than weaken, the Commission’s existing mandate. The core goal of the new body, she argued, should be to move the extensive policy planning the Commission has already completed off paper and into tangible, on-the-ground implementation that improves outcomes for disabled Dominicans.

    Beyond the future of the revised action plan, major uncertainty remains around the National Commission’s role once the new unit is established. It is still unclear whether the unit will function as a complementary support body, providing additional administrative and technical resources to help the Commission deliver on its existing mandate, or if it will absorb core functions that the Commission has overseen for years.

    Observers and stakeholders alike have also raised concerns about the risk of institutional duplication, administrative confusion, and the potential sidelining of the years of work the Commission has already invested in advancing Dominica’s disability agenda. Without clear delineation of responsibilities, they warn, the new initiative could end up hindering progress rather than accelerating it.

    Crucially, these concerns do not amount to opposition to the creation of a dedicated national body for disability affairs. Stakeholders uniformly frame their calls for clarity as a push to ensure the new initiative builds on, rather than discards, the progress the Commission has already made, and strengthens existing institutional mechanisms rather than replacing them haphazardly.

    Advocates for the disability community stress that disabled Dominicans require three core things to see meaningful improvement: consistent, uninterrupted policy development, clearly defined lines of institutional responsibility, and measurable, actionable progress that delivers tangible benefits. That starts with full transparency around the current status of the revised National Action Plan, and how the document will shape the government’s approach to disability policy moving forward. The calls for clarity take on added urgency given the significant time, labor, and resources the National Commission has already invested in developing evidence-based policy recommendations and moving the national disability agenda forward.

  • FLASH : The low number of registered voters is worrying

    FLASH : The low number of registered voters is worrying

    As Haiti prepares for its upcoming electoral process, the country’s Provisional Electoral Council (CEP) is sounding the alarm over a sharply underperforming voter registration campaign, with less than 13% of the official target achieved more than six weeks after the process launched.

    Registration kicked off across Haiti on July 20, 2026, with the CEP setting an ambitious goal of enrolling 4 million eligible new voters ahead of the upcoming vote. As of the latest update on September 6, just 506,953 voters had completed their registration, equal to only 12.6% of the body’s overall target. With the registration deadline scheduled for October 13, election organizers have just 37 remaining days to reverse the trend and boost participation among eligible citizens.

    To facilitate the registration process, the CEP has deployed 2,761 trained field operators across the country, alongside a network of 1,418 designated registration centers. Currently, only 1,271 of these planned centers are fully operational, a gap that may be contributing to the slow enrollment pace.

    Week-by-week data from the CEP reveals dramatic volatility in registration rates since the campaign launched. The process got off to an anemic start in late July, with just a few hundred applications submitted daily. A modest uptick emerged in early August, when daily applications climbed to between 15,000 and 20,000. The highest daily turnout came during the second half of the month: the single busiest day was August 17, which saw 24,775 new registrations, followed by a second peak of 23,783 applications on August 25. Since the start of September, however, the pace has slowed sharply, falling to fewer than 3,000 new applications per day by September 6.

    A breakdown of demographic data shows near gender parity among registered voters so far: men account for 50.8% of the total at 257,447, while women make up the remaining 49.2% at 248,769. By age group, middle-aged voters make up the largest share of enrollees: the 39 to 48-year-old bracket leads with 114,177 registered voters, followed closely by 29 to 38-year-olds with 110,028. Young eligible voters aged 18 to 28 have registered 79,811 voters to date, while participation declines steadily among older age groups, falling from 90,932 registered voters in the 49 to 58 bracket to just 44,034 among voters aged 69 and older.

    Geographic enrollment also varies widely across Haiti’s departments. The South department has recorded the highest raw number of registered voters at 79,878, followed by the West 1 district (73,499) and Grand’Anse (62,116). At the opposite end of the spectrum, the Center and Artibonite departments have among the lowest raw registration totals, at 36,958 and 36,013 respectively. Even when measured against each department’s pre-allocated registration capacity, utilization rates remain uniformly low across the country: the Southeast department posts the highest rate at just 12.92% of its planned capacity, followed by Grand’Anse at 12.36% and Nippes at 11.78%. Artibonite has utilized less than 5% of its planned capacity at just 4.58%, while the North department hits only 4.97%.

    The sluggish enrollment pace has raised widespread concerns among election observers and officials about the legitimacy and representativeness of Haiti’s upcoming electoral process, as organizers scramble to identify barriers to participation and ramp up outreach to under-enrolled groups before the fast-approaching deadline.

  • PM wants law enforcement to kill criminals who open fire on them

    PM wants law enforcement to kill criminals who open fire on them

    Amid a growing wave of armed robberies and escalating gun violence across Antigua and Barbuda, Prime Minister Gaston Browne has publicly defended the right of frontline police officers to use lethal force in self-defense when fired upon by armed criminal suspects, pushing back against automatic labeling of such fatal confrontations as extrajudicial killings.

    Browne made his position clear during an appearance on the *Browne and Browne Show*, broadcast on local outlet Pointe FM, where he also outlined a sweeping expansion of national security operations to counter the surging violent crime trend. “When they fire shots at the police and the police kill them, I don’t want to hear nothing about extrajudicial killings,” Browne stated during the interview.

    Crucially, the prime minister stopped short of issuing a blanket directive for officers to kill any suspect that opens fire on them. Instead, his core argument centered on the necessity of allowing law enforcement personnel to protect their own lives when confronted with a lethal threat from armed suspects. Browne emphasized that criminal groups are increasingly accessing high-powered weaponry, and warned that law enforcement must match that firepower to keep officers safe and maintain public order. “They’re coming out with their big guns; we’re putting our big guns on the road too,” he said.

    As part of the ramped up security response, Browne confirmed two key policy changes: first, he is calling for all serving police officers to be routinely armed, a shift from existing protocols that may only arm select units. Second, uniformed personnel from the Antigua and Barbuda Defence Force will be deployed alongside police officers to conduct intensified joint patrols across high-risk areas. Browne reiterated his position multiple times during the program, noting that fatal outcomes often occur when suspects initiate gunfire and officers respond only to protect their own lives.

    Browne’s comments are expected to reignite ongoing public and policy debate over the rules governing police use of lethal force, and the legal protections afforded to officers involved in fatal on-duty confrontations. By global standard practice, all police shootings are subject to independent investigation to confirm whether the level of force used was lawful and justified by the immediate threat facing officers. Despite this existing framework, Browne stressed that armed officers should not face automatic public or political condemnation for acting to defend their own lives when their safety is put in immediate, lethal danger.

  • LISTEN: PM Calls Corrupt Judicial Officers ‘Crooks’ and Warns They Could Be Deported

    LISTEN: PM Calls Corrupt Judicial Officers ‘Crooks’ and Warns They Could Be Deported

    In a recent public address on the locally broadcast *Browne and Browne Show* on Pointe FM, Prime Minister Gaston Browne has ignited widespread debate by defending a controversial policy proposal: the potential deportation of foreign-born judicial officers if verifiable proof confirms their involvement in corrupt practices, including accepting bribes from criminal networks or improperly meddling in active criminal proceedings.

    In his remarks, Browne emphasized that any deportation action would only proceed following the presentation of credible, substantiated evidence, rejecting pre-emptive claims that the threat would be deployed in an arbitrary or politically motivated manner. “If we find credible information that they crossed the line and started to take money from crooks … deport him, deport her,” the prime minister stated firmly, adding that his repeated public warnings on the issue were not empty rhetoric.

    Browne was careful to draw a line between targeting corrupt judicial conduct and interfering with case outcomes, stressing that he had no intention of dictating sentencing decisions for individual matters. “I’m not going to use it willy-nilly,” he said. “I’m not trying to dictate to anyone what sentences they should give in a particular case.”

    The prime minister’s comments came against the backdrop of broader criticism he has leveled at Antigua and Barbuda’s criminal justice system, which he argues has failed to meet public expectations by handing down excessively lenient sentences for firearms violations and sexual offenses. Browne claimed that the current approach allows dangerous, repeat offenders to return to local communities far too quickly, endangering public safety.

    Notably, however, Browne stopped short of naming any specific sitting judicial officer suspected of corruption, nor did he present any concrete evidence to back up his claims of bribe-taking or case tampering. He also failed to outline the specific legal framework or procedural steps that would be followed to remove and deport a serving foreign judicial officer from the country.

    Under standard judicial norms, judicial officers are guaranteed independence to decide cases without political interference. Any formal allegations of corruption against a sitting judge or magistrate typically require a formal, impartial investigation and follow established disciplinary or legal processes before any action can be taken.

    Despite these norms, Browne pushed back against arguments that judicial independence would act as a protective shield for corrupt officials. He maintained that when credible evidence of criminal misconduct emerges, no judicial officer should be exempt from accountability for their actions.

  • PM Browne Warns Judiciary Against Undermining Planned Stricter Sentences

    PM Browne Warns Judiciary Against Undermining Planned Stricter Sentences

    A major public confrontation over criminal justice policy is unfolding in Antigua and Barbuda, as Prime Minister Gaston Browne has issued a stark warning to the nation’s judiciary against obstructing his government’s plan to introduce mandatory minimum sentences for rape and firearms-related offences. Speaking in a recent interview on the popular Browne and Browne Show, broadcast on local station Pointe FM, Browne outlined the government’s clear timeline for advancing the reform: the new sentencing legislation will be tabled for parliamentary debate and vote on September 18, marking a major shift in the country’s approach to combating violent crime.

    At the core of Browne’s argument is a sharp rebuke of what he frames as systemic leniency within the judicial system, particularly when it comes to high-stakes offences involving illegal weapons and the sexual exploitation of minors. The prime minister argued that repeated instances of overly lenient sentencing have undermined public safety, allowing convicted violent offenders to return to communities quickly and reoffend at alarming rates.

    Browne directly pushed back against the widely anticipated criticism from legal and judicial circles, which argue that mandatory minimum sentences improperly strip judges of the flexibility to tailor penalties to the unique circumstances of each individual case. In uncompromising remarks, he asserted that judicial discretion cannot supersede the government’s core obligation to protect public safety. “When we go to Parliament and we put in the minimum sentencing for rape and for gun crimes, we expect you to cooperate,” Browne stated.

    Going further, the prime minister called for an end to the practice of granting substantial sentence reductions for good behaviour to people convicted of serious firearms offences, arguing that these offenders should be required to serve their full prescribed sentences. He also called out recent examples of sexual offence cases where offenders received only two to three year prison terms, noting that existing legislation already grants courts the authority to hand down far longer sentences for these harmful crimes.

    Browne’s intervention comes as part of a much larger national conversation about how to strike the right balance between three key priorities: upholding judicial independence, ensuring sentencing remains proportionate to individual crimes, and fulfilling the government’s duty to curb rising violent crime. As of press time, the judiciary has not issued any public response to Browne’s comments. Key details of the proposed legislation, including the exact length of the planned mandatory minimum sentences, also remain under wraps and have not yet been formally shared with parliament.

  • Antigua and Barbuda Forgoes About EC$4 Million Monthly by Removing Fuel Consumption Tax

    Antigua and Barbuda Forgoes About EC$4 Million Monthly by Removing Fuel Consumption Tax

    Antigua and Barbuda’s Prime Minister Gaston Browne has disclosed that the national government is forfeiting roughly EC$4 million in monthly revenue after scrapping the 15% consumption tax on petroleum products, a policy implemented to buffer local consumers from volatile spikes in global oil prices.

    Speaking during an appearance Saturday on the popular *Browne and Browne Show* broadcast on Pointe FM, Browne explained that eliminating the consumption tax forms just one component of a wider national fuel subsidy program designed to hold retail gasoline and diesel prices far below their true market cost.

    Prior to the EC$2 per gallon price adjustment implemented last week, retail gasoline was capped at EC$14.50 per gallon, while diesel retailed for EC$14.25 per gallon. According to Browne, on top of the forgone monthly tax revenue, the government has also transferred up to EC$15 million to the West Indies Oil Company to keep these artificially low price points stable. He characterized these direct payments as a “negative tax”, noting that the national Treasury is not only losing recurring tax income but also dipping into additional public funds to cover the gap between global and local fuel costs.

    The prime minister shared these fiscal details while addressing ongoing calls from local service station operators, who have pushed for an increase in their allowed profit margins. Browne recognized that fuel dealers have been squeezed by rising operational costs, including growing employee wage bills and higher credit card processing fees. However, he stressed that the government cannot continue to absorb the entire cost of the fuel subsidy while also approving an immediate jump in dealer margins. Instead, he argued that any additional costs must be shared across all stakeholders: “It has to be a joint burden,” Browne stated.

    He clarified that the recent EC$2 per gallon price increase was not structured to pad government revenue, but rather to slow the growth of the subsidy’s growing fiscal strain on public finances. Looking ahead, Browne issued a clear warning to consumers: if international petroleum prices continue their upward trend, additional local price increases will be unavoidable. The prime minister emphasized that the government has already hit the maximum limit of what it can fiscally absorb to keep consumer prices low.

  • PM Browne Questions Decision Allowing Firearms Convict to Attend Friend’s Funeral

    PM Browne Questions Decision Allowing Firearms Convict to Attend Friend’s Funeral

    The top leader of Antigua and Barbuda, Prime Minister Gaston Browne, has publicly raised sharp questions over a controversial administrative decision that permitted a prisoner serving time for firearm and ammunition violations to leave custody temporarily, under police guard, to attend the funeral of a friend.

    In pointed criticism directed at the public officials who signed off on the temporary furlough, Browne argued that this special consideration was entirely unjustified given the serious nature of the inmate’s conviction and the loose nature of his connection to the deceased person.

    Browne explained that he would not push back against approval for temporary release in the case of an immediate family member’s funeral—cases where the emotional stakes are far higher, such as the passing of a parent, child, or other close blood relative. What confounds him, he said, is the choice to extend that same privilege to a funeral for a casual friend.

    In remarks delivered during a public appearance, Browne pressed: “You’re going to let the man go to his friend’s funeral? What kind of common sense are you all using in this country?”

    Beyond questioning the specific call, the prime minister warned that these kinds of unguided, permissive decisions risk eroding the core deterrent purpose of incarceration. He added that over time, such moves could even normalize criminal activity by creating space for what he terms the public celebration of people convicted of serious offenses.

    The controversy has also sparked a broader push from Browne for systemic change in the country’s correctional system. He called for a renewed focus on meaningful offender rehabilitation, centered on structured work programs and targeted skills training. As potential models, he suggested that inmates learn skilled trades such as landscaping, and take part in supervised community improvement projects that let them give back to the public while building employable skills for their reentry.

    Notably, Browne did not release any identifying details about the inmate in question, the individual officials who authorized the temporary release, or the specific funeral that prompted this rebuke. No further information about the specific circumstances of the furlough or the existing institutional rules governing temporary prisoner release was shared during Browne’s public comments, leaving many key details of the incident unconfirmed at this time.