分类: politics

  • Abinader says freedom requires responsibility and constant commitment

    Abinader says freedom requires responsibility and constant commitment

    MIAMI, Fla. — In a high-profile address to an international audience of political and business leaders Saturday, Dominican Republic President Luis Abinader used his acceptance of the Champion of Freedom Award to deliver a sharp, thoughtful meditation on the fragile nature of liberty in the modern world. Presented with the honor by Florida International University’s Adam Smith Center for Economic Freedom, a nonpartisan think tank launched in 2020 to advance free-market principles and global prosperity, Abinader emphasized that freedom cannot be taken for granted as a permanent inheritance — it demands continuous responsibility and active commitment from every generation.

    The award recognizes Abinader’s tenure-long leadership advancing pro-market policy reforms in the Dominican Republic. In his remarks, he framed the honor as less a personal accolade and more an opportunity to renew public dialogue around what liberty means for 21st-century democratic societies. Warning of a growing risk that democratic communities erode their own freedoms when citizens trade autonomy for short-term security or comfort, Abinader rooted his argument in the core ideas of Adam Smith, the father of modern free-market economics, noting that durable economic freedom cannot exist without foundational commitments to justice, transparent institutional rules, and public trust in governing bodies.

    Abinader outlined that his administration has centered its policy agenda on four core pillars aligned with these principles: strengthening independent governing institutions, embedding transparency across public operations, upholding the rule of law, and expanding accessible economic opportunity for all Dominicans. Drawing on centuries of political and philosophical thought to reinforce his argument, the president quoted the iconic literary figure Don Quixote and referenced works by seminal thinkers Alexis de Tocqueville and Isaiah Berlin to explain that true freedom carries two complementary dimensions: it requires freedom from unnecessary coercion, as well as the material and social opportunity for every person to build a dignified, self-determined future.

    Against a global backdrop of rising political polarization, Abinader called for renewed commitment to cross-ideological dialogue, pluralism, and collaborative consensus-building. “Growth is not just about producing more. It is about allowing each person to imagine and build their own future,” he told the crowd, stressing that meaningful freedom and shared economic prosperity are inherently inseparable goals.

    The invitation-only event drew a roster of high-profile attendees spanning government, global business, and international sports governance, including former Colombian President Iván Duque and FIFA President Gianni Infantino. The Adam Smith Center for Economic Freedom, which conferred the award, was established in 2020 as an independent, nonpartisan research institution focused on advancing policy frameworks that expand economic freedom and drive human prosperity worldwide.

  • Spanish Ambassador highlights strong economic ties with the Dominican Republic

    Spanish Ambassador highlights strong economic ties with the Dominican Republic

    In remarks timed to coincide with Europe Day, Spanish Ambassador to the Dominican Republic Lorea Arribalzaga Ceballos has emphasized that the partnership between the two nations extends far beyond formal diplomatic relations, rooted in shared community contributions and deepening economic cooperation across the Atlantic.

  • Cuba warns of ‘bloodbath’ if US attacks and Washington issues sanctions

    Cuba warns of ‘bloodbath’ if US attacks and Washington issues sanctions

    HAVANA, Cuba — Long-standing geopolitical tensions between the United States and Cuba erupted into open escalation on Monday, as the U.S. Department of the Treasury unveiled new punitive sanctions targeting the Caribbean nation’s top intelligence service and most senior government officials, while Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel issued a stark warning that any American military incursion would unleash an unprecedented “bloodbath.”

    Diaz-Canel’s comments came 24 hours after U.S.-based news outlet Axios published an exclusive report citing unnamed American intelligence officials, which claimed Cuba had acquired more than 300 military-grade drones from Russia and Iran, and was evaluating plans to deploy these unmanned systems against targets including the U.S. Navy’s Guantanamo Bay base on Cuba’s eastern coast, U.S. military vessels operating in the region, and even parts of Florida. The unconfirmed report has fueled already rampant speculation across Washington that the Trump administration is actively considering large-scale military action to overthrow Cuba’s communist government, a path it took against the sitting government of Venezuela just months earlier.

    Responding to the claims on the social media platform X, Diaz-Canel pushed back firmly on accusations that Cuba poses any offensive threat to the U.S. or any other nation. While he did not directly confirm or deny the report of a stockpiled drone arsenal, he emphasized that Cuba holds an inalienable, legitimate right to build up its defensive capabilities to fend off any foreign military attack. “That cannot be wielded, logically or honestly, as an excuse for imposing war on the noble Cuban people,” he wrote. He added that any unprovoked U.S. attack would trigger a bloodbath with consequences that cannot be reasonably calculated.

    Hours after Diaz-Canel’s statement, the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control formally announced the new round of sanctions, placing prohibitions on Cuba’s primary intelligence agency and nine high-profile Cuban nationals. The sanctioned list includes the country’s cabinet ministers for communications, energy, and justice, alongside multiple senior leaders of the Communist Party of Cuba and at least three active-duty generals.

    This latest escalation is part of a steady ramp-up of American pressure on Cuba that began in January, when former President Donald Trump openly floated the possibility of removing Cuba’s sitting leadership, mirroring the U.S. military operation that ousted the Venezuelan government earlier that same month. Soon after, Washington cut off one of Cuba’s last remaining critical economic lifelines by halting all Venezuelan oil shipments to the island — Venezuela had long been Cuba’s primary fuel supplier — and threatened to impose punitive tariffs on any third country that moved to cover the resulting fuel gap.

    That American oil blockade has dramatically worsened an already severe humanitarian and energy crisis across Cuba. Widespread, increasingly frequent blackouts have become a daily reality for Cuban citizens, as the country’s aging, poorly maintained power plants cannot generate enough electricity to meet basic demand. Cuban government officials have repeatedly accused Washington of intentionally sabotaging the country’s economy through the crippling fuel blockade to create a pretext for full-scale military intervention.

    The controversial Axios drone report was published just days after Central Intelligence Agency Director John Ratcliffe traveled to Havana for closed-door negotiations with Cuban officials. It also coincides with widespread U.S. media reports that the Trump administration is pursuing criminal indictments against 94-year-old Raúl Castro, the younger brother of iconic revolutionary leader Fidel Castro and former Cuban president, as another tool in its broader pressure campaign against the island.

    Cuban authorities say the fuel blockade has left the country with critically low stockpiles of diesel and fuel oil, which are required to power backup generators that supplement the output of the country’s crumbling power infrastructure. Even amid the rising geopolitical standoff, Cuba received a new 1,700-ton shipment of humanitarian aid from Mexico on Monday, marking the fifth such delivery from Mexico’s left-wing administration since February. Unlike earlier aid shipments, which were transported by Mexican navy vessels, this consignment was carried by a Panamanian-flagged merchant ship, according to on-the-ground reporting from Agence France-Presse journalists. Cuba’s Minister of Food Industry Alberto Lopez confirmed that the shipment includes powdered milk and beans earmarked for children and elderly residents, two of the island’s most vulnerable populations.

  • ‘A wicked act’, says Brown Burke after AG flags slow use of hurricane funds

    ‘A wicked act’, says Brown Burke after AG flags slow use of hurricane funds

    KINGSTON, Jamaica — Jamaica’s main opposition party has launched a scathing rebuke of the national government after a damning auditor general report revealed that just a tiny fraction of donated hurricane relief funds have actually been deployed to support affected communities. As of February 23, 2026, the Office of Disaster Preparedness and Emergency Management (ODPEM) had only spent $26.2 million of the $1.44 billion raised in donations following the catastrophic Category 5 Hurricane Melissa — that equals less than 2% of the total pledged funds. The opposition People’s National Party (PNP) has labeled this gross under-spending a deliberate “wicked act” against vulnerable Jamaican households still reeling from the storm’s destruction.

    Addressing reporters at a PNP press briefing on Monday, Dr. Angela Brown Burke, the party’s spokesperson on Social Protection and Social Transformation, emphasized that the slow disbursement of critical relief resources is particularly unacceptable given the unprecedented scale of damage Hurricane Melissa left in its wake.

    “Most Jamaicans have not forgotten just how extensive the harm from this storm was. Late last year, the Red Cross calculated that more than 156,000 residential properties suffered damage, and close to 90,000 families were directly impacted by the hurricane,” Brown Burke told journalists.

    “Even if every dollar donated had been put to use immediately, there would still have been an unmet gap in support for affected families. That makes it all the more outrageous that $1.44 billion in relief is sitting untouched with no clear plan to get it to the people who need it. This is nothing short of a wicked act against our most vulnerable citizens,” she added.

    The shadow cabinet minister went on to stress that all donations were earmarked explicitly for delivering urgent shelter and life-saving assistance to survivors of the storm. In her view, the auditor general’s independent review lays bare deep, systemic failures in governance, financial oversight, and public accountability across the entire national hurricane relief program.

    “The findings are damning: millions of dollars in funds and critical relief supplies cannot be independently traced or verified, and the Jamaican citizens who need support most are left completely without protection,” Brown Burke said.

    The real-time audit of the Hurricane Melissa Relief Initiative, which also reviewed financial management and procurement processes under the government’s flagship Roof Restoration Programme (ROOF), uncovered a host of additional accounting irregularities. Audit investigators found that $34 million worth of roofing materials earmarked for home repairs cannot be properly accounted for, due to widespread missing signed delivery slips and official goods received notes. On top of that, more than $141.1 million in recorded committed expenditure has no supporting, verified payment documentation on file.

    Brown Burke has issued a series of clear demands to the ruling government to address the audit’s findings, starting with full public transparency. She is calling on authorities to publish a complete, detailed list of all ROOF programme beneficiaries, including parish-level breakdowns of recipients and clear documentation of the eligibility criteria used to select which households receive support.

    “We also require independent, third-party verification of all completed home repair work that the government has reported. That is non-negotiable. We are already hearing reports of discrepancies: homeowners who repaired their own properties using a mix of personal savings and limited government assistance check their parish office records, only to find the work is incorrectly listed as completed by the Jamaica Defence Force. These inconsistencies need to be sorted out immediately for the public to trust this process,” Brown Burke explained.

    She also called on government agencies to extend greater dignity and respect to Jamaican families that have been forced to stay in emergency shelters after their homes were destroyed or damaged by Hurricane Melissa. Closing her remarks, Brown Burke urged the ruling administration to prioritize the needs of storm survivors.

    “I am calling on the Government to find its conscience, and commit to doing better by the Jamaican people who rely on this support,” she said.

  • Hylton calls on gov’t to provide immediate update on hurricane-donated goods

    Hylton calls on gov’t to provide immediate update on hurricane-donated goods

    KINGSTON, JAMAICA – Jamaica’s main opposition figure for trade, industry and global logistics, Anthony Hylton, has issued an urgent demand for the national government to publicly disclose full details of uncollected hurricane relief goods currently held in storage at the country’s ports and cargo terminals. Hylton’s call for accountability comes on the heels of a damning report from the Auditor General’s Department, formally presented to Jamaica’s Parliament last Tuesday, that laid bare major gaps in disaster relief management following Hurricane Melissa.

    The audit’s findings paint a striking picture of mismanagement: by February 23, 2026, the Office of Disaster Preparedness and Emergency Management (ODPEM) had received a total of JMD 1.44 billion in donations earmarked for survivors of Hurricane Melissa, but had only allocated and spent JMD 26.2 million – a mere 1.8 percent of the total funds committed to relief efforts. Further audit data revealed that as of the same cutoff date, ODPEM retained roughly JMD 569.6 million and USD 5.9 million in active hurricane donation accounts. Alarmingly, this balance includes unspent funds carried over from prior Hurricane Beryl relief operations: JMD 138.8 million and USD 101,974 that had gone unused even before fundraising for Hurricane Melissa launched.

    Speaking at a press conference hosted by the People’s National Party (PNP) on Monday, Hylton warned that the botched handling of international donations risks long-term harm to Jamaica’s global standing. “When Hurricane Melissa hit, Jamaica rightfully appealed to the global community for urgent support, and we received that generosity. But instead of delivering that aid to the people who needed it, we have trapped those donations and put donors through a prolonged bureaucratic and financial nightmare,” Hylton explained. “This does lasting reputational damage that goes far beyond our borders, and it erodes the trust that future donors will have in Jamaica’s ability to manage international assistance effectively.”

    Hylton emphasized that small local Jamaican businesses and diaspora-led humanitarian groups – which moved quickly to mobilize and ship critical supplies in the immediate aftermath of the storm – are among the hardest hit by the delays. Many of these organizations lack the deep financial reserves to cover months of unexpected storage fees at port facilities, and few have the legal expertise to resolve contractual disputes with freight and logistics operators over the held goods, he added.

    Beyond the immediate call for transparency, Hylton laid out three key demands from the Opposition. First, the government must immediately publish a full public accounting of all donated goods that remain uncollected in storage or have been abandoned at Jamaican ports and cargo facilities, including a full accounting of any perishable goods that spoiled in storage and were ultimately disposed of in landfills. Second, Hylton called for the creation of a targeted relief program that will either waive accumulated storage fees charged to donors or fully reimburse those who have already paid the costs. Finally, the Opposition is demanding that the government draft and publish a formal, comprehensive disaster response protocol ahead of the start of the 2026 Atlantic hurricane season. This protocol must cover end-to-end processes for customs clearance, port handling, cold chain storage for perishable supplies and medical products, and coordinated partnerships with freight operators to prevent a repeat of the post-Melissa mismanagement, Hylton said.

  • New Attorney general Munroe dismisses conflict concerns

    New Attorney general Munroe dismisses conflict concerns

    Following the Progressive Liberal Party’s landslide victory in last week’s Bahamian general election, where the party secured 32 of the 41 available parliamentary seats, a new cabinet has taken shape, bringing with it questions around potential ethical conflicts for one top appointee.

    Wayne Munroe, the newly sworn-in Attorney General and Minister of Legal Affairs, is pushing back against growing public concerns that his decades-long legal career — marked by multiple high-profile lawsuits against the Bahamian government and extensive representation of defendants charged by state agencies — will create unacceptable conflicts of interest in his new role leading the country’s legal framework.

    Munroe is no stranger to top government office: he previously served as Minister of National Security under the Progressive Liberal Party, and held the Freetown parliamentary constituency seat for years. In a notable twist from the election results, he became the only nominated cabinet member to fail to retain his seat in last week’s vote. Despite the election outcome for his constituency, the party tapped him for the critical attorney general role, and he was officially sworn in during a formal ceremony at Government House this past Friday.

    In a press briefing immediately after the ceremony, Munroe leaned into his extensive legal background as a strength for the role, rather than a liability. Over his decades in private practice, Munroe built his reputation handling complex civil and constitutional litigation, including multiple cases brought against the government. Beyond private practice, he has also previously served as a sitting Supreme Court judge and led the Bahamas Bar Association as its president, giving him deep cross-sector experience across the country’s legal ecosystem.

    Addressing the conflict of interest claims directly, Munroe shared a lighthearted observation from peers to frame the conversation. “Someone made a joke and said, if I have to be in court, they prefer for me to be representing the government than suing the government,” he told reporters. “If I’m not in government, I’m going to go back to the business that I do, which is civil and constitutional litigation.”

    When pressed on whether any of his past lawsuits against the government remain active, Munroe clarified that he had stepped away from active private practice four and a half years ago, leaving no ongoing personal litigation against the state. For any potential future matters that involve legal work from his former law firm, he committed to following standard ethical protocols: “You recuse yourself,” he said, confirming he would step aside from any matters where a conflict could arise.

    Munroe’s appointment fills the role left vacant by former Attorney General Ryan Pinder, who signaled his departure from the post back in January. At the time, Pinder told reporters that while he had not formally stepped down earlier, his tenure had come to a formal end, and he had no plans to remain in frontline Bahamian politics, quipping, “Don’t hold your breath” for a return to elected office.

    The appointment comes as the new Progressive Liberal Party government settles into its mandate, with the leadership banking on Munroe’s decades of cross-cutting legal experience to guide the country’s legislative and regulatory agenda over the coming term.

  • Prime Minister names Jerome Fitzgerald to Cabinet post

    Prime Minister names Jerome Fitzgerald to Cabinet post

    Nearly a decade after a high-profile corruption scandal helped sink the Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) in a landslide 2017 electoral defeat, Jerome Fitzgerald — the Bahamian politician whose career has long been tied to that controversy — has been tapped to return to the national Cabinet, where he will oversee the country’s economic affairs.

    Fitzgerald, a former member of parliament for the Marathon constituency and ex-education minister who is set to be appointed a senator, was officially sworn into office on Saturday as Prime Minister Philip “Brave” Davis launched his second term in office. His comeback to top-level government is not a sudden surprise, however: over the PLP’s previous term, Fitzgerald served as a senior advisor in the Prime Minister’s Office, where insiders say he wielded outsized behind-the-scenes influence, and he also managed the PLP’s successful 2024 re-election campaign.

    Fitzgerald’s most damaging political controversy emerged on the eve of the 2017 general election, when leaked internal emails revealed he had lobbied heavily for multi-million-dollar brokerage, trucking, and limousine contracts tied to the massive Baha Mar resort development for a company founded by his father. The scandal became a central talking point for the opposition Free National Movement (FNM), which campaigned heavily on allegations of widespread PLP corruption. The FNM went on to win that election in a historic landslide, and Fitzgerald lost his Marathon parliamentary seat.

    The leaked correspondence showed Fitzgerald requested a $20,000 monthly stipend from original Baha Mar developer Sarkis Izmirlian, claiming the funds would cover medical expenses for his ailing father. In a 2014 email, he pressed Baha Mar executives to direct brokerage and shipping business to Bahamas Cargo and Logistics, his father’s firm, after earlier overtures had only resulted in a one-time contract for 40 containers.

    “Unfortunately despite all efforts by you and promises to me by Daniel Liu (CCA’s vice president) that we would receive the brokerage and trucking work, we have not apart from a one time deal to move 40 containers. I do not know why, I am disappointed, but I have accepted it and moved on,” Fitzgerald wrote in the message. “I know that the interior Furniture and Fittings should begin arriving shortly, and I would really wish to now establish a relationship between Baha Mar and Bahamas Cargo and Logistics Limited (“BCL”) where all ports of entry can be advised that BCL is to collect the paperwork and clear shipments for Baha Mar. It is my hope that the relationship will continue when the hotel opens and we will again be the broker and trucker for this property as we were for so many years.”

    Izmirlian ultimately forwarded the email to his senior leadership team, noting that all contracts should be awarded based on competitive cost and demonstrated capability, not political pressure. At the height of the scandal, Fitzgerald denied abusing his office to steer contracts to himself or his family. He clarified at the time that he held no ownership stake in BCL and never personally held a contract with Baha Mar or its affiliates, arguing he only followed up on his father’s pre-existing business discussions after his father fell ill. He maintained that no contract ever materialized from his outreach.

    The Baha Mar controversy is not the only scandal that marked Fitzgerald’s past tenure in government. In 2012, an underground fuel leak at a Rubis service station in his Marathon constituency released approximately 12,000 gallons of unleaded gasoline. The leak was detected in late December 2012, and a subsequent investigation by global environmental consulting firm Black & Veatch found local residents had been exposed to potentially dangerous toxins, including benzene, a confirmed human carcinogen. Though the firm’s final report was completed in February 2014, it was not released to the public until April 2015, after months of sustained public pressure and a heated town hall meeting with angry stakeholders. Marathon residents and local business owners expressed outrage over the delay, with critics accusing the PLP government of suppressing the report and failing to warn affected communities about the public health risks in a timely manner. Multiple local families ultimately filed legal action against Rubis Bahamas and the service station’s former operator.

    Fitzgerald’s return to senior public office first stirred controversy back in 2021, when the Prime Minister’s Delivery Unit announced on social media that he would serve as the unit’s senior policy advisor and head. The announcement was quickly deleted, and while initial OPM sources claimed the appointment had not been finalized, the office later confirmed Fitzgerald had joined the team without offering details on his specific role. Prime Minister Davis has long defended Fitzgerald, dismissing the Baha Mar controversy as “no harm” and “no foul” in 2021 comments to reporters, saying he has full confidence in Fitzgerald’s ability to help guide the country. Davis argued he was seeking out the most capable Bahamians to advance his policy agenda, and that Fitzgerald was one of the people he trusted to deliver results. When pressed specifically on the 2017 Baha Mar scandal, Davis questioned the premise of the question, repeating that there was no wrongdoing tied to Fitzgerald’s actions.

    Following Saturday’s swearing-in ceremony, Fitzgerald said he had worked closely with Davis and the full Cabinet over the past five years, praising Davis as a leader with a “heart of gold” and noting the pair had secured significant progress during the last term, even as much work remains to address national challenges. Over the past three months, Fitzgerald said he had traveled extensively across the Bahamas, speaking directly with thousands of citizens to better understand their challenges, aspirations, and desire for a government that creates pathways for all Bahamians to learn, earn, and build personal wealth. That commitment, he said, will be at the center of his work leading the country’s economic portfolio. He also noted he is optimistic about the Bahamas’ future, pointing to high youth turnout and engagement in the recent election as a promising sign, and emphasized that young people should remain actively involved in government planning and decision-making moving forward.

  • Golding demands immediate tabling of IC report on FLA

    Golding demands immediate tabling of IC report on FLA

    KINSON, Jamaica — Jamaica’s Opposition Leader Mark Golding is pressing parliamentary authorities to publicly table a long-completed investigative report from the country’s Integrity Commission (IC) into misconduct allegations at the Firearm Licensing Authority (FLA) when the House of Representatives convenes for its next sitting.

    In a formal correspondence sent to House Speaker Juliet Holness this Monday, Golding outlined that the IC finalized and submitted the probe report to Parliament all the way back on March 30, 2026, yet the document has never been brought before the full chamber for public review. Citing a recent investigative piece published by *The Sunday Gleaner*, Golding confirmed that the speaker has already received official notification from the IC that the report centers on claims of systemic corruption, improper conduct, and administrative irregularities across multiple core FLA operations. These problematic areas include the issuing, modification, and cancellation of firearm licenses, as well as mismanagement in the storage of seized and held firearms and ammunition at the authority’s facilities.

    Golding emphasized that the ongoing delay in releasing the report has become a pressing issue of major public concern. As a government statutory body endowed with broad, critical regulatory responsibilities, the FLA is inherently bound to principles of public accountability and transparent scrutiny, he argued.

    “This protracted failure to disclose the report is a serious and dangerous breach of public trust. The FLA is not a private individual — it is a public institution with statutory mandate over high-stakes regulatory functions. There is an undeniable and overwhelming public interest in bringing any improper or irregular practices in its operations to light, so that corrective action can be taken,” Golding wrote in the letter.

    The opposition leader also pushed back against common justifications for withholding the document centered on ongoing related court proceedings. In a democratic system, he contended, transparency and open public debate must take priority, and active litigation does not provide a valid reason to keep the report hidden from constituents.

    “Ongoing court proceedings cannot serve as a legal or appropriate justification for continuing to withhold this report from the public. In this context, it is important to highlight that courts have long affirmed that open public discourse and constructive criticism are foundational to a functioning democracy. Public bodies are expected to accept scrutiny, rather than leveraging legal processes to block transparency, evade accountability, and silence public oversight,” Golding noted.

    He referenced a landmark UK legal precedent, *Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers*, in which courts ruled that permitting public authorities to file defamation claims over harm to their institutional reputation would have a severe chilling effect on free public expression — a outcome the judiciary has consistently refused to allow.

    Golding concluded that unless a specific, binding court order explicitly prohibits the report’s release, there are no legal or ethical grounds to delay tabling it any further.

    “As Leader of the Opposition, it is my formal duty to call for this report to be tabled when the House next meets. I trust that in your role as Speaker, you will fulfill your own duty to ensure this action is carried out when the chamber convenes next Tuesday afternoon.”

  • FNM: Bastian and Miller-Brice posts may be tested in court

    FNM: Bastian and Miller-Brice posts may be tested in court

    A brewing political controversy has emerged in the Bahamas after the recent swearing-in of two new Cabinet ministers, with the main opposition Free National Movement (FNM) demanding full transparency and threatening to bring the issue before the courts for judicial review over alleged compliance gaps with the country’s Gaming Act.

    The controversy centers on Sebas Bastian, the newly appointed Minister of Innovation and National Development and MP-elect for Fort Charlotte, and Leslia Miller-Brice, incoming Minister of Culture, Arts and Heritage and MP-elect for Seabreeze. Both appointees have well-documented connections to the Bahamian gaming sector: Bastian previously served as chief executive of major gaming operator Island Luck, while Miller-Brice’s husband Leander Brice recently stepped down as head of GLK Limited, which trades as A Sure Win Gaming House Operator, ahead of his wife’s appointment.

    Under Sections 25 and 26 of the Bahamas’ Gaming Act, sitting Cabinet ministers, members of the national Gaming Board, and their immediate family members are prohibited from holding gaming employment licences, and are barred from holding a 5% or greater financial stake in any licensed gaming operator. While the law does not implement an outright ban on all individuals with past industry ties serving in Cabinet, it raises critical questions about whether current regulatory restrictions have been fully satisfied for the two new appointees.

    In an official statement released this week, the FNM argued that the governing Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) has failed to provide the Bahamian public with clear explanations for how the pair were cleared for Cabinet service. The opposition said Bahamians deserve full disclosure of whether either minister or their families retain any gaming-related financial interests, and if such interests were divested, full details of when and how that process was completed. If full disclosure does not resolve outstanding questions, the FNM says the matter should be tested in court to cement a clear judicial interpretation of the law that upholds the national interest.

    FNM Chairman Dr. Duane Sands emphasized that the dispute is not a minor technical debate, but a core issue of transparency, governmental accountability, and public trust in the rule of law. “The public deserves an explanation from the Progressive Liberal Party,” Sands said, noting that a number of critical questions remain unanswered: Have the ministers fully given up any ongoing income from gaming sector businesses? Do any hidden holdings still exceed the 5% ownership cap? He also pointed to a striking inconsistency: Prime Minister Philip “Brave” Davis previously ruled Miller-Brice out as a suitable candidate for Cabinet in his last administration, and the public is owed an explanation for why that assessment has changed. Sands added that while the FNM has not formally committed to legal action, all possible pathways remain on the table, and the government must prove it has followed both the letter and the spirit of existing law.

    Both appointees have pushed back against criticism, asserting that they completed all required regulatory steps to meet compliance standards ahead of their swearing-in. Bastian stepped down as Island Luck CEO earlier this year after being ratified as a PLP candidate. Speaking on the sidelines of the official swearing-in ceremony at Government House Saturday, he said his team had worked closely with gaming regulators to confirm all conditions for appointment were satisfied, and directed further questions to the Bahamas Gaming Board. “The gaming laws are in place, and we would’ve done work with the regulator to ensure that we were compliant and meet all of the regulatory conditions, which were a prerequisite obviously to these appointments, and I am confident that they have been satisfied,” he said.

    Miller-Brice echoed that defense, noting that she and Bastian had proactively engaged with the Gaming Board to adhere to all existing rules and guidelines ahead of taking up their new posts. “We have taken the proactive steps necessary, we have engaged with the Gaming Board, and so we’ve done all that we can to follow the rules and the guidelines that the gaming board has put in place,” she said. “Now this gives me and Mr. Bastian an opportunity to take on the role of serving in the capacity as cabinet ministers.”

    Latrae Rahming, communications director for the Office of the Prime Minister, has directed all inquiries about the compliance process to the Gaming Board, noting that a formal public statement addressing the matter will be released in the near future. However, many observers and critics say that referring the issue to the Gaming Board is unlikely to resolve concerns, as the Act grants the sitting minister responsible for gaming the authority to appoint all board members, designate the board chair, and terminate board appointments at will, raising questions about the board’s independent oversight capacity.

    Questions about Miller-Brice’s gaming ties and Cabinet eligibility have circulated for months. She served in the previous Davis administration as Bahamas’ Ambassador to CARICOM and chair of the National Independence Secretariat, but was not selected for a Cabinet post at that time. In July 2025, she publicly called for a review and amendment of the Gaming Act’s restrictions on Cabinet members and their families holding gaming licences, though she declined to confirm whether she was directly affected by the existing rules. Prime Minister Davis responded at the time by stating that there were no plans to amend the law, and existing eligibility rules governing gaming interests would remain in force for all Cabinet appointees.

  • ‘We are asking for a little bit more time’

    ‘We are asking for a little bit more time’

    Growing frustration among Jamaican public passenger vehicle (PPV) operators over the government’s broken promise to implement a long-awaited 16% fare increase has pushed the administration to request an additional 14 days to finalize a formal decision, with a final response pledged no later than June 1. The announcement was made by Transport Minister Daryl Vaz during a press briefing held at the Transport Centre in Half-Way-Tree, St Andrew on Monday.

    Vaz confirmed that the finalized Cabinet draft submission on the fare adjustment would be forwarded to Finance Minister Fayval Williams the same day, emphasizing that the timeline extension is the result of a long-running bureaucratic process, not a last-minute reaction to a protest meeting held by operators earlier that morning. “We are asking for a little bit more time. We are going to send out that submission today, and in discussions with Minister Williams, she has asked for two weeks before we can bring the submission to Cabinet for a final determination. So it means that that Cabinet submission will go to Cabinet on Monday, June 1,” Vaz explained.

    The minister’s statement came just hours after operators raised alarms over planned service disruptions scheduled for the same day, sparked by the government’s failure to meet the original implementation deadline for the remaining fare increase. Blaming the prolonged delay on escalating global geopolitical instability, Vaz argued that the government’s hold on the 16% hike has actually protected PPV operators and consumers alike from the full brunt of skyrocketing petroleum prices driven by ongoing military tensions between the US-Israel bloc and Iran. “We are trying to balance a delicate situation, but whereas you have not gotten the 16 per cent as of right now, you have been cushioned by the policies of the government in relation to how we handle the war and the increases in price,” Vaz said. “I don’t need to say to you what the effect would be on the Jamaican people if we were to use or to move away from the $4.50 ceiling per week and have a tiered approach in terms of the level of increase.”

    Finance Minister Fayval Williams, who joined Vaz at the press conference, echoed this caution, noting that a full one-time fare increase would send ripple effects through Jamaica’s already strained economy, pushing up prices for essential goods and services across the board. To mitigate this economic shock, Williams revealed that policymakers are considering implementing the 16% increase in two separate phases rather than a single jump. “I know everybody is expecting an all at one go, but remember, we’re all living in Jamaica. We’re all experiencing the higher oil prices,” Williams said. “So we’re asking for forbearance from everyone, knowing that the government has been subsidising the prices, not been letting through 100 per cent of the increase that Petrojam is bearing.”

    The roots of the current dispute stretch back to 2023, when the Jamaican government approved a total 35% cumulative fare increase for PPV operators to offset rising operating costs. Only the first phase of the hike, 19%, has been implemented so far. The remaining 16% was originally scheduled to go into effect in April 2024, but missed the deadline amid ongoing economic uncertainty, triggering growing unrest among transport operators who say their margins have been erased by spiking fuel costs.