US to revive rule that could deny green cards to immigrants using public benefits

In a policy shift announced Thursday by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, a restrictive Trump-era immigration regulation is set to return, opening the door to denying permanent resident status to immigrants who access common taxpayer-funded public assistance programs including food stamps and Medicaid.

The policy, rooted in the second Trump administration’s broader crackdown on unauthorized migration, frames the change as a defense of fiscal responsibility: officials argue that applicants seeking green cards should not rely primarily on government subsistence programs, a classification known in U.S. immigration law as a “public charge.”

The updated rule will go into effect across the United States on September 18 of this year, according to the DHS’s official announcement. Its origins trace back to 2019, when the Trump administration first introduced the regulation, dramatically expanding the legal definition of a public charge. Under the 2019 framework, any immigrant who received eligible government benefits for more than 12 months within any three-year window would be classified as a public charge, making them ineligible for permanent residency.

That broad expansion was rolled back in 2021 by the Biden administration, which significantly narrowed the criteria that would trigger a public charge green card denial, rolling the policy back to its narrower pre-2019 scope. The reversal came after years of sustained legal challenges and widespread outcry from immigrant support groups.

In a statement posted to the social platform X, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services reaffirmed the administration’s policy stance, noting that the revived rule reinforces the long-standing core requirement that immigrants residing in the U.S. must be self-reliant and avoid dependence on public benefits supported by U.S. taxpayers.

The original 2019 version of the rule faced fierce pushback from immigrant advocates, who argued that the policy intentionally targeted low-income immigrant communities, creating an unnecessary barrier that would block thousands of eligible people from accessing permanent legal status in the country. Many public health and social policy experts also warned that the rule would discourage immigrants from accessing life-saving healthcare and food assistance, even when they are legally eligible for those benefits, leading to worse public health and economic outcomes for immigrant families.