On Wednesday, 3 June 2026, the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Heads of Government issued a formal statement from the organization’s Secretariat based in Turkeyen, Greater Georgetown, Guyana, extending warm, heartfelt congratulations to the Government and people of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago following the country’s successful election to a non-permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council for the 2027-2028 term. The election, held the same day the statement was released, saw Trinidad and Tobago secure overwhelming backing from the United Nations’ global membership of member states. According to CARICOM’s leadership, this broad, cross-regional support is a clear reflection of the widespread confidence the international community holds in Trinidad and Tobago’s decades-long dedication to upholding multilateral cooperation, advancing global peace and security, and defending the core principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter. CARICOM emphasized that the election outcome is not just a landmark personal achievement for Trinidad and Tobago, but a moment of collective pride for the entire 15-nation Caribbean bloc. The regional body further noted that Trinidad and Tobago will bring a much-needed, distinct perspective to the Security Council’s deliberations, centering the experiences and priorities of Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and Low-lying Coastal Developing States, a group disproportionately vulnerable to global shocks ranging from climate change to geopolitical instability. CARICOM leaders expressed full confidence that Trinidad and Tobago will leverage its new seat to advocate vigorously for policy solutions that address the unique threats to peace and stability facing the Caribbean and other similarly vulnerable regions across the globe. In closing, the Caribbean Community reaffirmed its unwavering support for Trinidad and Tobago as it prepares to take on this critical global responsibility next year, and confirmed that the entire bloc stands ready to work closely with the country to advance the collective interests of the Caribbean region within the framework of the United Nations system.
分类： politics
-
United Progressive Party leadership calls for greater transparency on international airport project
As Dominica pushes forward with construction of its new flagship international airport, scheduled for completion in 2027 under the leadership of lead developer Montreal Management Consults Development Ltd (MMC), the country’s main opposition United Progressive Party (UPP) is intensifying calls for full governmental transparency around the megaproject’s long-term financial outlook.
Led by party head Joshua Francis, the UPP has stressed it does not oppose infrastructure expansion that would boost the island nation’s global connectivity and support economic growth. Instead, the opposition says Dominican citizens deserve full access to details about the potential fiscal risks of a project of this scale, particularly given the unique economic vulnerabilities small island developing states face.
In a formal press release outlining its concerns, the UPP flagged a suite of interconnected global economic headwinds that could threaten the airport’s ability to operate without ongoing public funding: persistent global inflation, rising aviation and operational overhead costs, volatile post-pandemic tourism demand, and systemic economic fragility common to small island nations. The party warned that without sustained, robust economic growth across Dominica’s key sectors, local taxpayers could ultimately be forced to cover ongoing operational shortfalls through public subsidies.
To underscore its argument, the UPP pointed to the well-documented experience of Argyle International Airport in neighboring St. Vincent and the Grenadines, a similar large-scale infrastructure project built to drive tourism growth. Originally designed to handle between 1.2 million and 1.5 million annual passengers, Argyle has consistently fallen far short of its traffic projections. Official data from the airport’s early years shows just 185,224 passengers in 2017, 189,324 in 2018, and 203,465 in 2019, and the UPP says recent numbers remain a tiny fraction of the airport’s intended capacity. The opposition added that public records and government budget documents confirm St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ government has repeatedly allocated public funds to cover the airport’s maintenance and operational gaps.
Against that regional precedent, the UPP says the Dominican government must answer critical unaddressed questions before moving further with construction. These include how ongoing operational costs for the airport — including staffing, maintenance, runway repairs, security, and debt repayment — will be covered if passenger volumes fail to hit projections, whether covering those gaps will lead to higher taxes, increased user fees, or expanded national public debt, and whether a comprehensive independent feasibility assessment and long-term cost-benefit analysis have been completed and made available for public review.
The opposition emphasizes that Dominican residents must receive clear, unambiguous answers before the country commits future generations to what could be crippling, unsustainable long-term financial obligations. The UPP holds that all large-scale national infrastructure projects should be rooted in transparent planning, prudent fiscal management, realistic growth projections, and guardrails that protect taxpayers from excessive debt exposure.
To enable informed public debate around the project, the UPP is formally requesting the Dominican government publish a full set of key planning documents, including the complete economic feasibility study, long-term operational cost estimates, passenger and tourism demand projections, debt-servicing schedules, projected annual subsidy requirements, and contingency plans for scenarios where revenue falls short of forecasts.
In closing, the UPP stated that national development initiatives should be guided by evidence-based economic planning and public accountability, not short-term political priorities. The party reaffirmed its commitment to responsible infrastructure development, greater government economic transparency, and protecting Dominica’s long-term fiscal stability.
-
Werkbezoeken president leveren nieuwe afspraken
Suriname’s President Jennifer Simons has returned to the country following a series of official working visits to two Latin American and Caribbean nations – Brazil and the Dominican Republic – that have yielded a broad suite of new bilateral cooperation agreements spanning key sectors from public health to diplomatic engagement. The trip marked a major push by Suriname to deepen its economic and diplomatic ties across the Latin American and Caribbean region, according to official government statements.
During the first leg of the tour in Brazil, Simons held formal high-level talks with Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. The in-depth discussions covered a wide range of shared priorities, and resulted in new cooperation pacts across seven core areas: public health, defense, cybersecurity, agriculture, trade, infrastructure, and energy. The two leaders also used the meeting to exchange views on pressing cross-border issues, including regional integration efforts and global climate action, aligning their positions on shared regional challenges.
After concluding engagements in Brazil, Simons and her official Surinamese delegation traveled onward to the Dominican Republic for the second phase of the tour. Discussions in Santo Domingo centered on three key priorities: boosting bilateral investment, expanding agricultural collaboration, and growing cross-border tourism. By the end of the visit, the two sides formalized new partnerships by signing a total of six distinct cooperation agreements.
One of the most significant diplomatic outcomes of the Dominican Republic visit is an agreement to further strengthen bilateral ties between the two countries, including a planned establishment of a Dominican Republic embassy in Paramaribo, Suriname’s capital. That update was officially confirmed by Suriname’s Communication Service in a post-visit statement.
While in the Dominican Republic, President Simons also delivered an address to the country’s National Congress. In her speech, she touched on a range of critical topics including regional integration, climate change, and collective security. She emphasized that small developing nations face interconnected shared challenges that can only be effectively addressed through coordinated, joint action.
Suriname’s national government has stated that all agreements reached during both visits are expected to drive substantial expansion of economic and diplomatic cooperation between Suriname and the two host nations, laying a long-term foundation for mutually beneficial growth across multiple sectors.
-
Strong courts ‘vital’ to development, public trust
Delivering the keynote William G. Demas Memorial Lecture at the Caribbean Development Bank’s 56th annual gathering, Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) Associate Justice Denys Barrow delivered a urgent, clear message Thursday: strong, autonomous judicial systems are non-negotiable for advancing regional development, cutting pervasive crime, and upholding public faith in governance. Without broad citizen confidence in a region’s justice framework, he warned, the very foundation of law and order risks unraveling.
Centering his address on the theme “Contributions of the Courts to Caribbean Development: The Enduring Importance of Strong Institutions”, Barrow pushed back against dominant narratives that frame development solely through gross domestic product growth or large-scale infrastructure builds. True progress, he argued, must ultimately be measured by tangible improvements to the daily lives and well-being of all community members. “It is the development of the community that must be the ultimate focus and beneficiary of our efforts,” he stated, noting that economic targets and infrastructure projects are simply milestones on the path to inclusive community advancement, not end goals in themselves.
Barrow emphasized that functional, accountable institutions, fair legal systems, and intentional policy frameworks all work in tandem to raise quality of life across the Caribbean — including progress on the region’s long-running, costly crisis of violent crime. He referenced the 2023 CARICOM summit hosted in Trinidad and Tobago, where regional heads of state reached a landmark agreement to reframe crime and violence as a public health emergency, rather than treating it exclusively as a law enforcement challenge. This paradigm shift, Barrow explained, redirects regional crime policy away from a singular focus on policing and punishment toward proactive violence prevention that stops harm before it occurs.
The judge spotlighted grim regional data to contextualize the urgency of reform: Caribbean leaders have confirmed the region’s homicide rate is roughly three times the global average, with growing alarm over persistent spikes in serious offenses including murder, sexual assault, manslaughter, armed robbery, and aggravated assault. Barrow also voiced strong support for the 2023 Needham Point Declaration on Criminal Justice Reform, a sweeping policy blueprint adopted at the seventh biennial Law Conference of the Caribbean Court of Justice Academy for Law. The declaration lays out a series of transformative reforms designed to modernize outdated criminal justice systems across the Caribbean, targeting longstanding pain points including chronic case backlogs, dangerous prison overcrowding, and eroding public trust in judicial institutions.
One of the declaration’s most ambitious and impactful proposals sets binding timeframes for case resolution: the document calls for regional judicial systems to aim to complete trials for indictable serious criminal cases within one year of charges being filed, while minor summary offenses should be finalized within six months. For a transitional adjustment period, the declaration sets staggered targets of two to three years for indictable matters and 12 months for summary offenses. Barrow stressed that eliminating unreasonable court delays serves the public good as much as it benefits parties directly involved in cases. “Beyond the interests of accused persons, victims, witnesses and family members, society as a collective has an overriding interest in the avoidance of unreasonable delay,” he said. Cutting backlogs, he argued, is critical to rebuilding public confidence by delivering early acquittals for innocent people, swift consequences for guilty offenders, and reinforcing the public’s understanding that crime will be followed by accountability.
On the topic of sentencing, Barrow noted that courts must continuously navigate and balance the competing needs of offenders, crime victims, and the broader public, striking a careful balance between demands for retribution and goals of rehabilitation. To illustrate this balance, he referenced the high-profile Campus Trendz case from Barbados that reached the CCJ on appeal: a 2010 robbery that ended with perpetrators throwing a Molotov cocktail into a locked clothing store, killing six young women trapped inside. In its ruling, the CCJ upheld six concurrent life sentences for the primary offender, meeting the public’s legitimate demand for retribution while also reaffirming that rehabilitation must remain a core consideration alongside other sentencing principles.
Barrow argued that prioritizing rehabilitation is especially critical for the Caribbean because the vast majority of the region’s violent offenders are young people. “The existential truth is that our nations cannot simply treat our young men as lost and write them off,” he said. When legislatures craft laws and courts hand down sentences that center rehabilitation as a core goal, he explained, Caribbean societies are making an investment in their own long-term future.
The CCJ justice also defended the vital role of independent courts in delivering impartial justice, even in cases that stoke intense public anger and widespread outrage. “The courts exist to provide to society the assurance that, even where popular opinion is outraged, our justice institutions must be trusted to apply the law,” he said. Barrow emphasized that justice must be guided by the rule of law, not personal demands for vengeance or arbitrary leniency — a principle that must be respected by victims’ families, convicted people, and the general public alike.
He reiterated that sustainable regional development depends entirely on public confidence in core state institutions, and the judiciary is the most critical of these. “It is a fundamental proposition and a predicate of our existence that we trust the courts to deliver justice,” he said. If that trust erodes, Barrow warned, communities will increasingly abandon formal legal processes and turn to extrajudicial “street justice” to resolve disputes, opening the door to a total breakdown of law and order. “What is sought to be prevented is the resort to street justice, the unravelling of the bonds of law and order,” he added.
Headquartered in Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, the CCJ serves as the final court of appeal for five Caribbean nations: Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Guyana, and Saint Lucia. All five countries have replaced the UK Privy Council with the CCJ as their final appellate body for both civil and criminal cases. Beyond its appellate role, the CCJ exercises original jurisdiction as a court of first instance with exclusive authority to interpret and apply the CARICOM treaty, hearing disputes between CARICOM member states, between member states and the Caribbean Community, and claims brought by individuals and private entities. Rulings from the CCJ in both its appellate and original jurisdictions are final and binding across all participating states.
-
US political commentators denied entry to United Kingdom following visa revocations
A political firestorm has erupted in both the United Kingdom and the United States after UK Border Force authorities revoked the Electronic Travel Authorisations (ETAs) of two well-known left-wing American political commentators, barring them from entering the country ahead of high-profile scheduled speaking events.
Hasan Piker, a popular Twitch streamer and progressive political analyst, and Cenk Uygur, co-founder and long-time host of the groundbreaking online news program *The Young Turks*, were slated to appear as keynote speakers at the newly launched SXSW London festival, alongside a separate public lecture at the University of Oxford. Both commentators took to social media platform X over the weekend to confirm they had been blocked from boarding their flights to the UK after their approved travel documents were suddenly cancelled.
Both men have directly tied the entry ban to their long-standing, vocal criticism of the Israeli government and its military campaign in the Gaza Strip. In a viral post on X, Uygur condemned the decision, arguing that it represented a troubling infringement of free expression for Western citizens. ‘I tried to get on a flight to London to attend SXSW London and give a speech at Oxford. I’ve been banned for criticising Israel. Are we free any more? This is oppression of western citizens by our own governments on behalf of a different country,’ he wrote. Piker echoed the accusation in his response, claiming the revocation was coordinated at the request of the Israeli government. ‘The UK has revoked my visa as well. All at the behest of Israel. The west is betraying ‘liberal values’ for a genocidal fascist foreign government,’ Piker wrote.
To date, the UK Home Office has declined to publicly share the specific reasoning behind the decision to revoke the pair’s ETAs. UK official guidance outlines that travel authorisations can be cancelled at any time if border authorities judge an individual poses a potential threat to UK public good or national security.
The ban has drawn both praise and condemnation across UK political circles. Labour Member of Parliament David Taylor, who previously publicly called for UK authorities to bar Piker from entering the country, hailed the decision. Writing on X, Taylor argued: ‘There’s no reason to open our doors to those who seek to spread hate and division, especially to those who’ve supported a proscribed terror group.’ The Community Security Trust (CST), a UK-based Jewish community organisation that tracks antisemitism and provides security for Jewish community events, also welcomed the outcome. While the group acknowledged that legitimate political criticism of the Israeli government is protected speech, it argued that Piker’s past public remarks crossed the line into antisemitic rhetoric.
Critics of the entry ban, however, have decried the decision as a dangerous overreach that undermines core principles of free speech and open political debate. Green Party of England and Wales leader Zack Polanski described the visa denials as ‘a really grim decision,’ while Akiko Hart, director of the UK-based civil liberties group Liberty, called for full transparency from the Home Office regarding entry restrictions that limit political expression.
A spokesperson for SXSW London confirmed the cancellation of the pair’s appearances in an official statement to the BBC, noting that immigration decisions fall entirely under the remit of UK Home Office authorities. The organiser reaffirmed the festival’s commitment to hosting open, inclusive dialogue featuring a broad range of diverse political perspectives.
This latest entry ban follows a string of recent controversial decisions by UK authorities to bar high-profile foreign nationals from entering the country on public interest grounds. Recent bans have included American rapper Kanye West, who was barred over a history of antisemitic comments, multiple international political activists, and a group of extreme right-wing figures ahead of a major London demonstration held last month.
-
Peace Foundation defies TTPS warning: Walk for Peace to proceed
A public conflict over constitutional rights and public safety has emerged in Trinidad and Tobago, as the Peace Foundation TT is standing firm in its plan to hold a “Walk for Peace” in downtown Port of Spain, even after national police explicitly stated the event has not received legal approval under the country’s ongoing State of Emergency.
The standoff unfolded in coordinated statements released by both sides on Wednesday, with each party outlining their core positions and justifications for their stances. In its formal public response, the Peace Foundation TT emphasized that the gathering was never intended to disrupt public order — instead, the entire initiative was built around a simple, unifying mission: to push for an end to violent community conflict across the nation, and foster widespread values of unity, love, and collective peace.
The organization addressed law enforcement’s concerns directly, acknowledging the TT Police Service (TTPS)’s position while pushing back against the proposed restriction on the gathering. The foundation’s legal argument centers on a key principle of constitutional governance: that limits on fundamental civil rights can only be legally justified when there is clear, provable evidence that an event poses a real threat to public safety. To date, the group says, authorities have not produced any such evidence demonstrating their peaceful procession would put the public at risk. The foundation has formally requested clarity on the specific legal and operational justifications for blocking the event.
Despite the confrontation with police, the Peace Foundation TT reiterated its unwavering commitment to non-violence and adherence to the rule of law. “Our message remains simple: Trinidad and Tobago deserves peace, unity, and safer communities for all,” the group’s statement read. It closed by reaffirming its intention to move forward with the event, framing the walk as a broader movement for positive change: “The Walk for Peace remains a movement of hope, love, and positive change. One Nation. One People. One Peace.”
Earlier the same day, the TTPS had issued its own formal warning to the public, advising citizens against taking part in the event, which was scheduled to kick off at 3 p.m. in Port of Spain, with a planned assembly point on Piccadilly Street. Police stressed that they share the foundation’s goal of reducing violence and building peaceful communities, and fully support legitimate initiatives aligned with those aims. However, they noted that all public gatherings, marches, and processions are bound by strict legal conditions and mandatory security reviews while the State of Emergency remains in effect.
“At this time, no authorisation has been granted for any public march or procession associated with this event,” the TTPS confirmed. Police warned that participating in an unauthorized procession along public roads qualifies as a violation of current emergency regulations, carrying potential legal consequences for attendees. Beyond the lack of approval, authorities also raised specific practical concerns around the planned Piccadilly Street starting point, citing unresolvable public safety and traffic management challenges, as well as the inherent risks of large, uncoordinated public gatherings under current rules.
The TTPS urged community members to avoid joining the unapproved event, follow official lawful directions from serving officers, and use pre-approved government channels to pursue advocacy and community organizing. Law enforcement added that it will continue actively monitoring developments around the planned walk, and will take all legally permitted action necessary to uphold public order, protect civilian life and property, and safeguard national security.
-
‘Despicable’ or Satire? PM Briceño Calls Alberto August’s Post ‘Disgusting’
A fresh political controversy has erupted in Belize, centered on a cyberbullying complaint filed by sitting Home Affairs Minister Oscar Mira against former United Democratic Party (UDP) Chairman Alberto August, and Prime Minister John Briceño has publicly weighed in to defend Mira’s actions amid rising concerns over political free speech.
Speaking to reporters on June 3, 2026, Briceño made clear that he stands fully behind Mira’s choice to pursue the legal complaint, even as he acknowledged that he would not personally take the same step against his own political critics. The core of Briceño’s argument centers on framing Mira’s action as an assertion of individual constitutional rights, rather than an official government attack on political opposition. Briceño emphasized that Mira retains the same rights as any private citizen in the country: if he believes he has been the target of defamation and harmful slander, he is fully within his legal and constitutional rights to file an official report with authorities.
Critics of the complaint have raised alarms that the arrest linked to the case sets a dangerous precedent that could stifle legitimate political criticism and erode protections for free speech in the country. Briceño outright rejected these concerns, pushing back against claims that August’s controversial social media post qualifies as protected political satire. In blunt terms, Briceño dismissed the satire framing, calling August’s conduct “disgusting” and accusing the former UDP chair of exploiting the tragedy of a grieving family to score political points.
The pushback against Mira did not end with free speech arguments: on Monday, August’s attorney, Michael Peyrefitte, labeled the home affairs minister “thin-skinned” and publicly called on Prime Minister Briceño to remove Mira from his cabinet post. Briceño refused this demand, noting that all public figures have different thresholds for offensive speech and that Mira was justified in taking a formal stance against what he saw as harmful defamation. In a surprising turn, Briceño even joked that he himself might consider filing similar legal action against August, though he quickly downplayed the prospect.
When asked if August’s frequent critical social media posts about Briceño personally have ever tempted him to pursue similar cyberbullying charges, the prime minister was dismissive. Briceño made clear that he does not consider August worth the time or effort of legal action, noting that the former UDP chairman can say whatever he wants about Briceño without causing any personal offense.
-
Building boom
Jamaica is experiencing a robust post-disaster rebuilding boom, driven largely by residential and small-scale property development, official data presented to parliament confirms. Just months after Hurricane Melissa made landfall in October last year, the surge in building permit applications processed by municipal corporations signals a faster-than-expected recovery across the island nation.
Local Government and Community Development Minister Desmond McKenzie outlined the encouraging trends during his Wednesday address to the House of Representatives’ sectoral debate. He highlighted that the fastest growth, an 11% uptick, has been recorded in applications for small residential developments under 300 square meters – a segment that covers family homes, small retail outlets and local manufacturing facilities.
Across all post-hurricane applications, 71% have received approval within the targeted 90-day processing window, representing a total projected investment of $36.1 billion. Most notably, between January and March of this year, 1,377 applications worth a combined $68.8 billion were submitted. Minister McKenzie emphasized that this first-quarter volume outpaces the total number of applications received in any full quarter dating back to the second quarter of 2023, calling the result “highly encouraging and positive news.”
The data also shows that construction activity was already expanding steadily in the nine months leading up to Hurricane Melissa’s arrival. During that pre-storm period, more than 3,700 building applications were submitted – an 11% year-over-year increase – with a total valuation of $46.1 billion, marking a rise in overall investment compared to the equivalent period in 2024. Eighty-one percent of those pre-storm applications won approval within the 90-day benchmark, totaling $164.2 billion in approved project value.
Even after the hurricane damaged municipal infrastructure in at least four parishes, processing speeds remained largely stable: 78% of post-Melissa applications still cleared approval within the 90-day timeframe. Minister McKenzie credited this resilience to the coordinated effort of local authorities and partner agencies including the Jamaica Fire Brigade, which kept the development approval pipeline moving through the emergency response and into the active reconstruction phase.
To support the ongoing rebuilding effort, the government is rolling out systemic updates to building regulation this financial year. A revised national building code, which introduces a mandatory requirement for new construction to withstand Category 5 hurricanes, will be fully implemented in the coming months. The new framework also grants municipal corporations stronger enforcement powers, introduces mandatory compliance inspections, and imposes harsher penalties for unpermitted construction in high-risk flood or storm zones.
To boost on-the-ground enforcement capacity, Jamaica’s Ministry of Finance has approved a revised staffing structure for municipal corporations that will allow local authorities to hire additional specialized building inspectors and compliance officers. Minister McKenzie stressed that this reconstruction effort is not about simply replacing what was destroyed by the storm.
“Our goal is not to restore what has been lost. It is to replace lost infrastructure with vastly modern, climate-smart and resilient structures that dramatically improve the lives of our citizens,” he told lawmakers. The minister added that speeding up the development approval process while raising building standards is critical to ensuring long-term community safety and sustained economic growth across disaster-prone regions of the country.
-
$60m allocated for shelter improvements
KINGSTON, Jamaica – As Jamaica enters the annual Atlantic hurricane season, the country’s Minister of Local Government and Community Development Desmond McKenzie has unveiled a multi-pronged investment package to strengthen the island’s emergency disaster preparedness infrastructure, headlined by a fresh $60 million allocation to upgrade existing emergency shelters across the nation’s 14 parishes. McKenzie made the announcement Wednesday during his address to the 2026/27 Sectoral Debate in Jamaica’s House of Representatives, outlining that the new funding will immediately go toward upgrading conditions in municipal-run emergency shelters islandwide. The allocation will be used by local municipal corporations to procure essential comfort items including new blankets, cots, and bedding to improve living conditions for residents forced to evacuate their homes during storm events. Describing the funding as the first major preparedness investment released as the hurricane season gets underway, McKenzie emphasized the government’s commitment to keeping vulnerable communities safe through proactive infrastructure investment. Beyond the immediate upgrade funding, McKenzie outlined a transformative new long-term strategy for emergency shelter management that shifts away from Jamaica’s historical practice of activating scattered small venues during storm events. Going forward, the government will construct purpose-built large-scale regional emergency shelters in three high-risk parishes, designed to accommodate hundreds of evacuees in safe, comfortable conditions. The first three purpose-built shelters will be located in the parishes of Clarendon, St Elizabeth, and Westmoreland, with a total estimated project cost of $1 billion. Each facility will span roughly 10,000 square feet and have capacity to house up to 700 evacuees at full occupancy. Unlike ad-hoc emergency shelters that are repurposed from schools or community centers, these new facilities will be engineered to withstand severe hurricanes and earthquakes, fitted with modern energy-efficient systems, and include year-round usable community amenities that benefit local residents even when no emergency is declared. McKenzie also provided a progress update on a separate permanent housing project for displaced shelter residents in Shrewsbury, Westmoreland, a community that has faced repeated displacement from extreme weather. He confirmed that 10 of the 16 reinforced concrete foundations required for the new permanent housing units have already been completed. The prefabricated housing units themselves are currently held by the Jamaica Defence Force and are scheduled to be transported to the site in the near future. Once construction is fully completed, all pre-registered displaced residents will move into the new government-provided housing units, resolving long-term displacement issues for the affected community. To further strengthen front-line disaster response capacity ahead of the full peak of hurricane season, McKenzie announced that 200 young Jamaican workers will be deployed to the Social Development Commission and local municipal corporations starting July 1. The young workers will serve across the entire duration of the 2026 hurricane season, working alongside local disaster coordinators to streamline shelter preparedness, run public outreach campaigns to inform residents of evacuation protocols, and boost overall municipal disaster response capacity across the island. The package of investments and reforms marks one of the most comprehensive overhauls of Jamaica’s emergency shelter system in recent years, as the country faces growing risks from more intense extreme weather linked to climate change.
-
US imposes sanctions on Cuban president, Castro family members
HAVANA, CUBA – In a sharp escalation of long-standing tensions between Washington and Havana, the United States announced a new round of sanctions Thursday targeting Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel, his immediate family, senior members of the influential Castro political dynasty, and key state entities, marking the latest aggressive move against the island’s communist government.
The expanded sanctions list includes the son and grandson of former Cuban President Raul Castro, who stepped down from official office years ago but still retains significant behind-the-scenes political influence across the country. Alongside Diaz-Canel, his wife and stepson were also sanctioned, as was Cuba’s Ministry of the Revolutionary Armed Forces and multiple other state-linked organizations.
Cuba has operated under a sweeping US trade embargo for more than six decades, dating back to 1962. But in the final months of his first presidential term, then-President Donald Trump drastically intensified American pressure, slashing the island’s access to critical fuel supplies and openly floating the possibility of seizing control of the territory.
The Trump administration justified the escalating measures by claiming Cuba’s communist government poses a direct national security threat to the United States. Following the US-backed ousting of Venezuelan socialist leader Nicolas Maduro in January and the rollout of a harsh new pressure campaign against Iran, Trump repeatedly signaled Cuba would be the next target for regime change.
Speaking to reporters Thursday, Trump alluded to this timeline, saying: “We’ll take care of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and as soon as that’s done, on our way back, we’ll just make a little brief stop over.” Despite this open threat, he denied the new sanctions – which came shortly after the US issued a murder indictment against Raul Castro and blacklisted a military-controlled conglomerate that dominates much of Cuba’s economy – were designed to force a rapid collapse of the Cuban government.
Washington had already placed travel bans on Diaz-Canel and his family barring entry to the US the previous year.
In a post on the social platform X, Diaz-Canel pushed back against the new measures, accusing Trump of seeking to “strengthen the blockade and scenario of conflict between Cuba and the United States.” He vowed that the Cuban people would “resist the imperialist onslaught.” Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez echoed this defiance, describing the sanctions as “vile” and affirming they would only be met with “greater unity and determination from our people.”
Trump framed the US actions as a push for improved conditions for ordinary Cubans, telling reporters at the White House that he simply wants Cuba to become “a nicely run country that can feed its people.” He added, “But the country is starving, and it’s got no energy, it’s got no oil, it’s got no money, it’s got nothing.” Even as he criticized the government, Trump mused about the island’s potential, noting that Cuba is “a beautiful piece of land” and adding, “You could have beautiful resorts.”
The punitive fuel embargo imposed by the US in January has already sparked a severe humanitarian crisis across Cuba. Without access to diesel for backup generators that prop up the island’s crumbling national power grid, communities face daily blackouts that can stretch up to 22 hours, and widespread tap water shortages have followed. Most public and private transport has ground to a near halt, and critical shortages of food and prescription medication have left the country dependent on emergency aid shipments from allies including Mexico and China.
On the same day the new sanctions were announced, the United Nations’ top representative on the island warned that the already unfolding humanitarian emergency, combined with the start of the annual Caribbean hurricane season, creates an “explosive cocktail” of risk for vulnerable communities. Much of eastern Cuba is still undergoing reconstruction after Hurricane Melissa caused catastrophic damage across the region in October of the previous year.