分类: politics

  • Replacing John-Bates on PAAC a ‘prudent’ decision

    Replacing John-Bates on PAAC a ‘prudent’ decision

    A political shakeup is unfolding in Trinidad and Tobago’s parliament following a breach of protocol in a high-stakes probe into pharmaceutical procurement, which has led to the removal of an opposition senator from a key oversight committee. Opposition Chief Whip Marvin Gonzales has publicly defended the decision to replace People’s National Movement (PNM) Senator Janelle John-Bates from the Public Administration and Appropriations Committee (PAAC), calling the move a prudent choice to protect the body’s integrity.

    The controversy stems from John-Bates’ alleged role helping former Health Minister Terrence Deyalsingh prepare his official response to PAAC’s ongoing investigation into pharmaceutical import, approval, and purchasing processes. The committee, which has drawn widespread public attention for its probe into special import permits, Nipdec payments, and claims of regulatory misconduct, recently discovered the unauthorized assistance, forcing an abrupt adjournment of its scheduled sitting earlier this week.

    PAAC Chairman and House Speaker Jagdeo Singh has repeatedly emphasized that all committee work requires strict confidentiality and adherence to due process. When contacted for comment this week, Singh declined to speak on the record, citing the confidentiality rules governing the inquiry. At the time of the adjournment, Singh offered a public apology to observers, noting the unusual step of addressing the adjournment directly given the high public interest in the probe. He described the break as regrettable but unavoidable, declining to share further details at that time.

    Thus far, the PNM leadership has not released an official public statement on the controversy, and Opposition Leader Pennelope Beckles has not responded to media requests for comment. Speaking exclusively to the *Express* via WhatsApp, Gonzales clarified that the leadership’s decision was rooted in protecting both the integrity of PAAC proceedings and the PNM’s internal party traditions, based on the facts currently available. He added that the full circumstances of the incident are still under internal review, and any speculation about how the case will progress remains premature at this stage.

    A decision on who will fill John-Bates’ vacant seat on the committee will be made by PNM’s political leader, according to Gonzales. The party’s executive council was scheduled to hold a meeting yesterday to deliberate not only on John-Bates’ committee replacement but also on whether she will retain her position as an opposition senator in the parliament. Currently, the PNM holds five other senate seats: held by Faris Al-Rawi, Dr Amery Browne, Foster Cummings, Vishnu Dhanpaul, and Melanie Roberts-Radgman, and political insiders indicate one of these sitting senators is expected to take over John-Bates’ spot on the committee.

    Parliament officials have already been notified of the impending change, and an official announcement is scheduled to be made during the next Senate sitting, set for next Tuesday at 1:30 p.m. As of now, there has been no confirmation whether John-Bates will be removed from her senate position entirely or only from the PAAC. The committee’s next scheduled meeting on the pharmaceutical procurement probe is set for April 27 at 1 p.m.

    Additional reporting has confirmed that former minister Deyalsingh, who is a key witness in the probe, allegedly received editing assistance on his committee statement from both John-Bates and fellow PNM Senator Faris Al-Rawi. During a previous hearing, the committee was told Deyalsingh authorized millions of dollars in pharmaceutical contracts to be awarded to specific private companies, adding further scrutiny to the ongoing investigation.

  • $3.4b contracts put on hold

    $3.4b contracts put on hold

    Trinidad and Tobago’s Office of Procurement Regulation (OPR) has issued a formal order suspending the awarding of TT$3.4 billion in public housing construction contracts by the state-owned Housing Development Corporation (HDC), launching a full review of the entire procurement process amid widespread allegations of irregularities. The directive, dated April 14, 2026 and signed by OPR chair and lead regulator Beverly Khan, came just days after opposition figures and a public activist raised formal concerns about the legality and transparency of the multi-billion-dollar award process.

    The suspension follows a cascade of calls for investigation led by Stuart Young, opposition Member of Parliament and former prime minister of Trinidad and Tobago, who first sounded the alarm about the contract awards earlier this week. Young went public with a full list of award recipients, leveling serious accusations that most of the firms selected for the large public housing projects lack the relevant experience and financial capacity to deliver the work, suggesting that cartel-like conduct and bid rigging may have tainted the process. Alongside Young, fellow opposition People’s National Movement (PNM) MP Camille Robinson-Regis also publicly pushed for a full review of the transaction.

    In addition to opposition pressure, the OPR also received a formal written complaint submitted via attorney Randall Mitchell on behalf of public activist Wendell Eversley. Unlike traditional bid protests from disqualified participants, Eversley’s complaint was filed in his capacity as a concerned citizen, focusing on the legality, ethical propriety and overall integrity of a procurement process that involved hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars. Mitchell confirmed in the complaint that his client was not a bidding participant in the process, and was only acting to uphold accountability for public spending.

    In its official statement announcing the suspension, the OPR confirmed the review is being conducted under its statutory authority granted by the amended Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Property Act 2015. The regulator noted it will not issue further public comment while the enquiry is ongoing to protect the integrity of the review process. The OPR’s mandate for the review includes verifying full compliance with the act, its associated regulations, official handbooks and procedural guidelines.

    Young responded to the OPR’s intervention this week saying he was encouraged that the regulator had acted on the opposition’s concerns. He emphasized that any form of bid rigging or collusive behavior would not be acceptable when public funds are at stake, noting that the halt was a necessary first step to root out any misconduct. Robinson-Regis echoed that support, framing the OPR’s directive as proof that the nation’s procurement legislation — originally enacted under the previous PNM administration — is working as intended to enforce transparency. She argued that the need for regulatory intervention points to reckless management by the current United National Congress (UNC) government, which campaigned on promises of improved governance but is now facing a major probe into billions in public housing spending. “You can’t promote transparency and then operate in secrecy,” Robinson-Regis noted in a statement.

    Phillip Alexander, a minister within the Ministry of Housing, defended the procurement process earlier this week and pushed back on the opposition’s criticism. Reached for comment after the OPR’s announcement, Alexander maintained that the current government has operated in full accordance with procurement law, and argued the ongoing review is itself proof of the government’s commitment to transparency. “Everything has to be transparent and above board,” he said, contrasting the current process with what he claimed was secretive contracting under the previous PNM administration. Alexander expressed confidence that the review will ultimately confirm all awards were conducted properly, noting that any official response to the OPR falls to the HDC leadership, which he expects to issue a public statement in the coming days.

    As of Thursday, HDC chair Feeroz Khan had not responded to multiple requests for comment on the suspension and ongoing review.

  • Patria: The Southern Frontline of Communication

    Patria: The Southern Frontline of Communication

    Against a backdrop of rising neo-fascist mobilization, systemic media manipulation, and a resurgence of imperial intervention across Latin America, the fifth edition of the Patria International Colloquium has opened its doors in Havana, casting digital communication as a critical frontline battle for sovereignty and truth.

    Hosted through April 18 at Havana’s Cultural Station on the corner of Línea and 18th Street, the 2026 gathering brings 150 delegates from more than 20 countries together to build collective capacity for truth-telling, cross-border organizing, and cultural resistance against coordinated global media campaigns. Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez, who also serves as First Secretary of the Party’s Central Committee, attended the opening ceremony on Thursday alongside other senior political leaders including Political Bureau members Roberto Morales Ojeda and Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla, plus representatives of domestic journalists’ networks and civil society organizations.

    At the core of the event’s mission is the goal of establishing a permanent global hub that unites critical scholarship, technological innovation, and grassroots communication practice, with Havana serving as the epicenter of the Global South’s pushback against media operations designed to erode domestic social consensus and criminalize national sovereignty. This year’s colloquium is officially dedicated to the legacy of Cuban revolutionary leader Fidel Castro.

    Opening remarks were delivered by Ricardo Ronquillo Bello, president of the Union of Cuban Journalists (UPEC), who condemned the decades-long U.S. blockade of Cuba as a “calculated and genocidal evil” that has pushed the island nation to its economic limits. Despite severe economic strains and required national adjustments, Bello noted that the revolutionary leadership made the deliberate choice to continue hosting the colloquium – which is funded primarily by participant contributions – as a demonstration of shared solidarity with progressive movements across the globe.

    Bello called out what he terms “communicational violence,” a strategic tool that disguises and enables other forms of physical and structural violence by shaping public narrative to serve dominant power interests. He highlighted that systematic, layered disinformation is now woven into the DNA of modern geopolitical campaigns, pointing to recent coordinated media offensives against Venezuela, Iran, and Cuba as clear examples. In line with Fidel’s legacy, he urged delegates to build a permanent, universal global coalition he termed “Operation Truth,” framing the colloquium as preparation to defend Cuba against what he called the “21st-century communications Bay of Pigs.” Closing his remarks, he echoed Cuban icon José Martí’s defining phrase: “Patria is humanity.”

    International solidarity messages poured in from global leaders and media figures. Maria Zakharova, spokesperson for the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, emphasized in a written address to participants that growing toxicity and misinformation in the global information space have made cross-national collaboration to counter disinformation, public opinion manipulation, and unauthorized information exploitation more urgent than ever.

    Zakharova described the Patria Colloquium as a vital platform where journalists, bloggers, academics, diplomats, and public figures can collectively stand for factual truth, intellectual freedom, and the right of every nation to define its own homeland without adhering to foreign-imposed norms. She reaffirmed the deep fraternal and strategic bonds between Russia and Cuba, noting that both nations share core commitments to national sovereignty – including digital sovereignty – a multipolar global order, respect for international law, and the centrality of the United Nations in global conflict resolution.

    Ghassan Ben Jeddou, president of the Al Mayadeen media network, also sent a digital message praising Cuba’s decision to move forward with the gathering despite the ongoing economic blockade that he described as a criminal, sadistic siege and fundamental violation of human rights. Jeddou underscored that the world is undergoing deep structural political and strategic shifts, and called for stronger coordinated, independent communication networks rooted in the Global South, built through inclusive joint mechanisms that center the priorities of Global South peoples.

    Throughout the first day of programming, panel discussions centered on the threats to national autonomy posed by Western digital hegemony. During a session on “Cultural Hegemony and Cultural Power” attended by President Díaz-Canel, Alina Duarte, a Mexican professor and political analyst affiliated with Latin American alternative media, argued that for decades, global powers have pushed a single narrative that frames neoliberal capitalism and U.S. imperialism as the only viable path for global development – but that movement leaders across the Global South are now writing the story of a new, more just world order.

    Duarte called for radical, intentional action in both thought and communication practice, arguing that every writer, every mobile device, every public voice can contribute to building this new, socialist future. She also raised alarms about the role of corporate social media algorithms, which she said have groomed generations of young people to prioritize personal validation, individualism, and ego over collective action, warning of the rise of “digital extractivism” that turns users’ free time into unpaid labor for platform giants that control what information reaches the public.

    Brazilian journalist Renato Rovai, a leading voice for critical media analysis in his home country, expanded on the conversation about the structure of digital power and its impact on 21st-century political and cultural discourse. Rovai noted that traditional analysis of political discourse focuses only on content, but power today is no longer just about what is said – it is about how content is distributed. “All of us here can speak, but who will listen? And who gets to shape what reaches the public?” he asked.

    Rovai identified major global tech platforms as the new gatekeepers of global public discourse, displacing the historic role of human editors who once determined which stories gained traction. “Today, the recommendation algorithms built and controlled by platforms decide what content gets shown to users,” he explained. He pointed to the shifting ideological alignment of Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg, who he noted once positioned himself as a progressive neoliberal but has shifted sharply to the extreme right to cement his alliance with the U.S. government. “The new global hegemony is held by a small group of actors that dominate global public opinion. There is a deliberate architecture of digital power that controls what we see and think,” he concluded.

    The opening day’s afternoon programming included two additional sessions: “Technopolitics: Between Control and Emancipation,” which explored the risks of technological dependence for Global South nations, the implications of artificial intelligence for public discourse, and the fight to defend social media as a space for sovereign organizing; and a roundtable focused on the role of critical thinking in shaping a fairer new global information order.

  • The socialist character of our Revolution is not a phrase from the past; it is the shield of the present and the guarantee of the future!

    The socialist character of our Revolution is not a phrase from the past; it is the shield of the present and the guarantee of the future!

    HAVANA, CUBA – On April 16, 2026, marked the “Year of the Centennial of Commander-in-Chief Fidel Castro Ruz”, Miguel Mario Díaz-Canel Bermúdez, First Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba and President of the Republic of Cuba, addressed a massive crowd gathered at the iconic intersection of 23rd and 12th Streets in Plaza de la Revolución. The event commemorated the 65th anniversary of the 1961 declaration that formally established the socialist character of the Cuban Revolution, a historic turning point that reshaped both the nation and global political dynamics.

    Opening his speech with resonant rallying cries – “Long live free Cuba!” and “Down with the blockade!” – Díaz-Canel turned to the foundational events of April 1961, when a generation of Cubans, many younger than the crowd assembled before him, gathered at the very same plaza as U.S.-backed mercenary forces prepared to invade the island at the Bay of Pigs. With the full military and political backing of the United States government behind the invading force, Fidel Castro Ruz, exhausted from hours of sleepless tension, stepped forward to publicly proclaim Cuba a socialist revolution, rooted in the demands of the dispossessed, operating defiantly at the doorstep of the world’s most powerful empire.

    That bold declaration set an irreversible course for Cuba’s revolutionary project, Díaz-Canel recalled. In less than 72 hours after the invasion began, a newly independent, outnumbered Cuban people defeated the mercenary force, dealing imperialism its first major military defeat in the Americas. That victory, he emphasized, opened a path to greater freedom for all peoples across the region, and transformed Cuba forever.

    In the decades following that momentous April day, Díaz-Canel traced Cuba’s progress under socialism: from the landmark Literacy Campaign that brought education to the poorest communities, to advances in human development that turned working-class children into global leaders – including Latin America’s first cosmonaut, born to a shoe-shiner under the pre-revolution capitalist system. He highlighted Cuba’s longstanding commitment to international solidarity, noting that the island has shared its expertise with marginalized and oppressed nations across the globe, sending doctors and teachers to fight apartheid, illiteracy, and preventable disease, rather than sending weapons and bombs. This, he argued, is the core of Cuban socialism: a system rooted in fraternity, not exploitation.

    Díaz-Canel also reflected on the severe trials Cuba has faced, particularly after the collapse of European socialist bloc in the 1990s. While global powers pushed for unregulated neoliberalism and mass privatization, Fidel Castro led the Cuban people in a superhuman struggle to preserve their sovereign socialist project. Through the resistance and creativity of ordinary Cubans, and the labor of the Cuban people’s army that turned to building and sowing when crisis hit, Cuba survived and rebuilt, proving that its socialist system could adapt and endure. Díaz-Canel quoted Raúl Castro’s iconic declaration: “Yes, we can!” – a promise the Cuban people have kept time and again.

    For more than six decades, beyond open military aggression, Cuba has faced a sustained, silent war waged from abroad: a decades-long U.S. blockade, codified in law, reinforced by terrorist attacks, disinformation campaigns, and constant sabotage of regional integration and international cooperation projects. One of the costliest outcomes of this aggression, Díaz-Canel argued, is the loss of thousands of skilled young Cubans, educated for free through the Cuban public system, who are lured away by capitalist economies that did not invest in their training, then falsely claim Cuba’s system fails to deliver opportunity. Díaz-Canel pushed back firmly on this narrative: “That human potential, which impresses and gains ground and relevance in any country it reaches, was shaped by socialism! Only socialism turned the children of workers and peasants into top-tier professionals – not in exceptional cases as under capitalism, but on a massive scale.”

    He rejected the widespread international narrative that frames Cuba as a “failed state”, arguing this framing is a deliberate deception to hide the genocidal impact of the 60-year U.S. blockade. The scarcity of essential goods, fuel shortages, and widespread economic strain that shape daily life in Cuba today are directly the result of this ongoing blockade, which acts as a noose around the neck of the Cuban economy. While the Cuban government acknowledges its own mistakes in building a unique, homegrown socialist project, Díaz-Canel stressed no one can deny the blockade’s primary responsibility for the suffering of Cuban families: “The main cause of our problems is the genocidal blockade imposed by the United States government against our people!”

    Díaz-Canel pushed back on global anti-communist narratives that seek to erase the transformative contributions of socialist experiments to global human progress. He noted that the USSR’s colossal contribution to defeating fascism and advancing space exploration can never be erased, just as the extraordinary development of China, lifting hundreds of millions out of poverty, and the dynamic growth of heroic, revolutionary Vietnam can not be denied. For Cuba, he said, socialism remains the only guarantee of social justice, the only path to collective emancipation, and the only framework that allows Cubans to mount a collective response to the collective punishment they have endured for decades. “Cuba is not a failed state; Cuba is a besieged state, Cuba is a state facing multidimensional aggression: economic war, an intensified blockade, and an energy blockade,” he declared. “Cuba is a threatened state that does not surrender! And despite everything, and thanks to socialism, Cuba is a state that resists, creates, and – make no mistake – a state that will prevail!”

    The 65th anniversary commemoration also marks the founding of the Communist Party of Cuba, which was forged in the heat of the Bay of Pigs invasion. Díaz-Canel noted that the aggressive tactics used by imperial powers against Cuba in 1961 – false-flag air strikes, disinformation campaigns, economic war, diplomatic isolation – are the same tactics repeated in interventions across the globe today. Yet despite the overwhelming technological, military, and media power arrayed against Cuba, global solidarity for the island continues to grow, a clear rebuke of the suffocating imperial policy aimed at bringing Cuba to its knees.

    From the historic plaza where Fidel’s calls to resistance still echo, Díaz-Canel called for a global movement of solidarity to spread the truth about Cuba’s current crisis. He detailed the daily suffering brought by the intensified energy blockade, which leaves Cubans facing hours-long blackouts that disrupt work, rest, and daily life, and paralyzes industries, transportation, and essential public services. All of this, he noted, stems from a decades-old executive order that falsely frames Cuba as an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to the United States.

    Díaz-Canel emphasized that the current challenging moment requires the same unity and readiness Cubans showed in 1961. While Cuba remains committed to dialogue and peace, and rejects unnecessary conflict that would bring suffering to both the Cuban and American peoples, the island has a duty to prepare to defend its sovereignty. “We do not want it, but it is our duty to prepare to prevent it and, if it is unavoidable, to win!” he said, noting that the faith in victory instilled by Fidel Castro remains unbroken among the Cuban people.

    As 2026 marks the centennial of Fidel Castro’s birth, Díaz-Canel paid tribute to the iconic revolutionary leader, who did not merely lead the Battle of Bay of Pigs, but embodied its defiant spirit: “Fidel was and is Bay of Pigs!! Fidel embodies the conviction that a united people can defeat an empire!”

    The current daily resistance to foreign aggression, Díaz-Canel said, is the modern epic Cubans are writing, the most fitting tribute to the revolutionaries who gave their lives for independence and socialism in 1961. He closed with a defiant reaffirmation of Cuba’s commitment to its socialist project: “The socialist nature of our Revolution is not a phrase from the past; it is the shield of the present and the guarantee of the future! Bay of Pigs is today and forever! Cuba will not surrender! Long live the rebellious dignity of our people! Long live Socialism! Homeland or Death! We shall overcome!”

  • Bay of Pigs is today and forever!

    Bay of Pigs is today and forever!

    On the eve of the 65th anniversary of the Bay of Pigs victory and amid the centennial celebration of revolutionary leader Fidel Castro Ruz, the Cuban government has issued a defiant statement reaffirming its unwavering commitment to defending national sovereignty and socialism in the face of intensifying pressure from the United States. For more than six decades, Cuba has operated under a persistent, punitive U.S. siege that has escalated sharply in recent months. Beyond the long-standing genocidal trade embargo, Washington has imposed a brutal energy blockade that has crippled daily life across the island, while top U.S. political elite have openly threatened direct military aggression against the Cuban people.

    The human and economic toll of this 60-plus year embargo stands as a permanent stain on the global reputation of the world’s largest superpower. The unilateral embargo is universally recognized as an illegal, inhumane violation of international law, condemned annually by nearly the entire membership of the United Nations and even rejected by a majority of the American public, recent public opinion surveys confirm.

    In response to this ongoing collective punishment, the Cuban people have emerged as a global model of steadfast dignity and resilient resistance. Since a new executive order targeting the island was issued this past January, the population has demonstrated even greater stoicism, adapting to widespread shortages across every sector of daily life while continuing to advance national priorities. Compounding the economic pressure, a coordinated global disinformation campaign has been launched to smear Cuba and its revolutionary government. Mainstream international media aligned with U.S. interests wage a dishonest campaign of distortion, filled with outright lies, exaggerated claims and deliberate denigration that deliberately obscures the root cause of Cuba’s current hardships. Rather than blaming the externally imposed crisis on the U.S. aggression that created it, the campaign falsely pins responsibility on Cuba’s revolutionary leadership. U.S. officials continue to rely on false pretexts to justify their hostility, labeling Cuba an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to U.S. national security and falsely designating the island as a state sponsor of terrorism.

    This hypocrisy is not a new development, and has been documented for more than six decades. A declassified 1960 memorandum from then-U.S. Under Secretary of State Lester Mallory laid bare the explicit, criminal intent of Washington’s policy long before it became the status quo. Mallory wrote that the U.S. should “rapidly employ all possible means to weaken the economic life of Cuba” through a campaign that is “as skillful and discreet as possible” to cut off the island from financial resources and essential supplies, with the explicit goal of triggering hunger, desperation and the overthrow of the revolutionary government.

    U.S. hostility has also spilled over into Cuba’s bilateral relations with sovereign nations across the globe. Washington continuously pressures governments in the Latin American and Caribbean region to cut diplomatic ties with Havana, and even forces them to expel Cuban healthcare workers who have served as a lifeline of medical hope for low-income communities across the region for decades. Isolation is the core strategic goal of this pressure campaign, but Cuba has not been left alone. Nations around the world have stood firm in solidarity with Havana, including sister nations like Mexico, Russia, China and Vietnam, all of which have rejected U.S. pressure to cut ties. The recent Our America Convoy, which defied U.S. threats and risks to deliver tangible aid and political support to the Cuban people, stands as a powerful reminder of this global solidarity. Reaffirming the words of Cuban national hero José Martí, participants made clear that “whoever rises up with Cuba today rises up for all time.”

    As heirs to a long legacy of anti-colonial resistance, with the fighting spirit of 19th century Mambí independence fighters and 20th century revolutionary rebels coursing through their veins, the Cuban people honor the courage of the nation’s heroes and martyrs – from the 32 Cuban service members who died in Venezuela to the young fighters who recently foiled a terrorist infiltration attempt through the Villa Clara region. The Cuban government emphatically declares that the island will never become a war trophy for the U.S., nor another subordinate nation in a U.S.-led regional order.

    Cuba is a nation rooted in centuries of struggle and unshakable ideological convictions, home to a peaceful, solidarity-driven people that defends its sovereignty through daily labor and collective commitment. Just as Cuban fighters defeated a U.S.-backed invasion on the sands of the Bay of Pigs 65 years ago under the iconic rallying cry “Homeland or Death!”, the nation will once again secure victory in its defense of self-determination and socialism.

    In this centennial year of Fidel Castro Ruz, the revolutionary commander who delivered the first major defeat to U.S. imperialism in the Americas, and with former leader Army General Raúl Castro Ruz still standing firm alongside the Cuban people, the government ratifies the national and international mobilization call issued April 16 by Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez, First Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba and President of the Republic. Echoing Díaz-Canel’s words, the statement closes with a defiant promise of victory: “As long as there is one woman or one man willing to give their life for the Revolution, we will be victorious! The socialist character of our Revolution is not a phrase of the past, it is the shield of the present and the guarantee of the future! Bay of Pigs is today and forever!”

  • Voter ID Renewals Surge Past 29,000 as Election Activity Intensifies

    Voter ID Renewals Surge Past 29,000 as Election Activity Intensifies

    As Antigua and Barbuda gears up for its upcoming general election, official data from the Antigua and Barbuda Electoral Commission (ABEC) reveals a dramatic uptick in voter identification card transactions, with cumulative volumes crossing the 29,000 threshold by mid-April 2026. The commission’s cumulative tracking report documents 29,868 total transactions processed between the start of the year and the April 16 cutoff, a figure that combines both first-time voter ID applications and requests for replacement or renewed cards. Disaggregated data by constituency shows uneven but widespread engagement across the country, with completion rates varying sharply between less populated districts and denser urban constituencies. The small St Peter constituency leads all jurisdictions nationwide with an impressive 88% completion rate for voter ID updates, followed closely by Barbuda at 76% and St Philip North at 75% — early indicators of strong voter preparation in these regions. By contrast, more heavily populated constituencies have recorded far higher raw volumes of applications but lower overall completion rates, signaling ongoing backlogs and unmet processing demand. All Saints West has logged the highest total volume at 2,616 applications to date, while St John’s Rural West follows close behind with 2,534 total requests. A closer look at weekly data covering the period of April 12 through April 18 underscores the accelerating pace of voter action, with a staggering 2,546 replacement applications and 323 new applications processed in just seven days. Daily transaction counts show a clear last-minute rush: the busiest day of the week was April 13, when 793 applications were submitted, followed by a gradual decline through the end of the week to 441 applications on April 16. This spike aligns with recent official signals confirming the timeline of the upcoming general election, motivating voters to complete the required ID update process ahead of polling day. Three key battleground constituencies — All Saints West, St George, and St Mary’s North — posted the highest weekly application volumes, reflecting heightened political mobilization in these competitive districts. As all registered voters are required to hold a valid, updated voter ID to cast a ballot in the upcoming general election, the nationwide surge in transactions confirms growing voter engagement and a widespread push across the electorate to meet participation requirements before polls open.

  • Dominican government denies links to Spain’s “Koldo Case” companies

    Dominican government denies links to Spain’s “Koldo Case” companies

    Amid growing international scrutiny tied to a high-profile Spanish corruption investigation centered on pandemic-era public contracts, the Dominican Republic government has issued a firm official statement cutting any ties between the current administration and companies linked to the so-called Koldo case.

    The clarification, released from the capital Santo Domingo, directly addresses recent reports published in Spanish media that have suggested connections between Dominican authorities and the entities named in the Spanish probe. The government explicitly stated that no public procurement contracts or purchase agreements have been signed with any of the connected firms since the current administration took office on August 16, 2020.

    Authorities went on to name each of the companies at the center of the allegations: Pronalab, Modular HV Corp, Reusa, GSI Dominicana, Bali, Megalab Eurofino, and Eurofins Histolog. Even amid unproven claims that suspects in the Koldo case attempted to secure business deals with the Dominican Republic during the height of the global COVID-19 pandemic, Dominican officials confirmed that no formal agreements were ever finalized with any of these entities.

    The statement reaffirmed that the current government maintains zero commercial or contractual relationships with these firms across all public sector procurement processes. This official pushback comes as the Koldo investigation continues to unfold in Spain, where authorities are probing widespread allegations of fraud and irregularities in public contracts awarded for pandemic-related response efforts. By issuing this explicit denial, the Dominican administration aims to reinforce its commitments to transparency and public accountability, pushing back against any implications of improper ties to the ongoing Spanish corruption probe.

  • St Kitts and Nevis cuts fuel tax and import duties to ease cost of living – WIC News

    St Kitts and Nevis cuts fuel tax and import duties to ease cost of living – WIC News

    Facing persistent global economic volatility that has pushed up everyday living costs for households across the Caribbean, the federation of St Kitts and Nevis has rolled out a targeted package of four tax and duty relief measures designed to put immediate savings back into consumers’ pockets. Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Dr. Terrance Drew outlined the new initiatives in a national address delivered on Tuesday, April 14, 2026, confirming all measures will enter into force on Monday, April 20, 2026.

    In framing the policy shift, Drew emphasized that the interventions respond directly to widespread household financial strain, noting, “These are genuine, targeted interventions to put money back in your pocket, to keep your lights on, to keep your vehicle moving and to help you breathe a little easier in a stormy world.” The government is absorbing more than EC $2 million in lost revenue to fund the relief package, a deliberate trade-off Drew defended as a critical investment in both household well-being and long-term economic growth: “Your Government chose relief over revenue – because when our people can breathe, our economy grows.”

    The first and largest component of the package is a 50% cut to the excise tax on gasoline, lowering the levy from EC$1.95 per gallon to just EC$0.98 per gallon. This temporary cut will remain in place through July 31, 2026, with the government covering EC$1.2 million in foregone revenue to deliver immediate savings to both private drivers and commercial consumers who rely on fuel for work and logistics. The second measure complements this cut with a reduction in customs import duty on gasoline, dropping the rate from 6% to 3% through the same end date of July 31. This additional cut, backed by EC$600,000 in government absorbed costs, will further reduce prices at the pump. “Every fill-up leaves a little more in your pocket,” Drew said of the fuel-focused cuts.

    To advance long-term energy affordability and the country’s transition to sustainable power, the third measure overhauls the federation’s alternative energy equipment policy. Through December 31, 2026, all imports of clean energy hardware, including solar panels, will be fully exempt from value-added tax (VAT), customs service charges, and import duties. The government will absorb EC$405,000 in revenue to support this initiative, which aims to lower barriers for households and businesses looking to invest in rooftop solar and reduce long-term reliance on costly imported fossil fuels.

    The fourth reform targets hidden consumer costs in cross-border trade. Moving forward, extra shipping fees charged by freight companies will no longer be included in the customs calculation base for import taxes and duties, eliminating what would otherwise be a “tax on a fee” and creating a more transparent pricing structure for imported consumer goods.

    In addition to the four permanent (temporary) new measures, Drew confirmed that the popular discounted VAT rate days will continue through 2026 to deliver additional targeted relief for major seasonal spending periods. The 2026 schedule includes an Easter discount day on April 17, back-to-school relief on August 28 and 29, and pre-Christmas season discounts (including for vehicle purchases) on December 11 and 19.

    Drew stressed that the entire relief package forms a core part of the administration’s broader Sustainable Island State Agenda (SISA) and SEED (Sustainability, Education, Empowerment, and Development) strategy. Beyond immediate household relief, the policy shift is part of a longer-term plan to reduce the federation’s economic dependence on the Citizenship by Investment programme and build a more diversified, resilient domestic economy that supports all residents.

    In a public Facebook post following the address, Drew called on local businesses to pass the full benefit of the government’s tax cuts through to end consumers, writing: “To our businesses: we ask not for charity but for fairness. When the Government reduces taxes, let those savings reach the people at the counter. Because when our people can breathe, our economy grows and that benefits everyone.”

  • Column: Een parlement in gijzeling van persoonlijke en partij politieke belangen

    Column: Een parlement in gijzeling van persoonlijke en partij politieke belangen

    When Suriname’s current National Assembly took office following the May 2025 general elections, Speaker Ashwin Adhin of the National Democratic Party (NDP) laid out an ambitious new agenda: a more effective, higher-performing legislature that would deliver faster, more substantive policy outcomes for the nation. More than nine months later, that pledge has proven far easier to make than to keep. The past months have brought nothing short of a continuous string of delays, quorum failures driven by bad-faith political maneuvering, coercion, and unethical bargaining across the body.

    The National Assembly’s current legislative docket is overflowing with time-sensitive, high-stakes bills that directly impact Suriname’s standing and future. Key legislation designed to prevent Suriname from being added to an international anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing blacklist remains stalled, with existing rules against both activities still not brought up to international compliance standards. At the same time, at least seven major financial bills that would reform the country’s tax system are scheduled for upcoming debates, while the national budget process is already months behind schedule — a problem compounded by disorganization within the governing coalition itself.

    Internal power dynamics within the ruling coalition are far from stable. The NDP holds the most visible, dominant position and sets the legislative agenda, but deep divides have already emerged within the National Party of Suriname (NPS), whose 6-seat caucus has split into competing factions pulling in opposite directions. Smaller coalition partners including the PL, A20 and BEP have adopted a cautious, waiting-and-seeing approach, and wield little meaningful influence over final decision-making.

    While all coalition partners have overlapping substantive and political disagreements over four initiative bills related to the functioning of the country’s judiciary, growing scrutiny is now focused on the role of the ABOP, led by Ronnie Brunswijk. It is an open secret that these bills are being wielded as a political pressure tool against the government and other coalition members. Support for legislation is not tied to its policy merits, but to the advancement of partisan interests, the protection of party positions and influence, and other demands with little connection to the public good. Far from rigorous parliamentary deliberation, the process has devolved into little more than backroom deal-making.

    The consequences of this gridlock are already tangible and widely felt: consistent quorum boycotts, fractured caucuses, and endless delays to critical decision-making. The legislature has subordinated its core mandate — drafting and passing laws that serve the national interest — to internal power struggles. And while these high-priority bills languish, a second alarming pattern has emerged: a surge in overseas travel by parliamentarians and government officials, with little to no transparency or public accountability.

    International parliamentary and government missions are a legitimate, necessary part of governing. But what is missing is basic openness about where officials are traveling, what the purpose of the trip is, how many people are attending, and what the total cost to public funds is. Even when trips are organized by invitation and partial costs are covered by hosts, public funds still cover expenses including daily stipends for delegates. Similarly, frequent government overseas trips have also been conducted without any public disclosure of details.

    A one-sentence summary confirming attendance at a conference or mission is nowhere near enough accountability. Elected representatives and government officials owe the public a detailed, transparent accounting of what tangible benefits these trips delivered for Suriname. As long as that accountability is not provided, public perception will only grow that lawmakers have gotten their priorities backwards. A parliament that stalls life-saving critical legislation but still jumps at the chance to travel overseas will inevitably lose the public’s trust.

    It is long past time for National Assembly members to be reminded that serving as a people’s representative is not an honorary title — it is a public responsibility. Right now, that responsibility is being treated as an afterthought. As long as political parties continue to prioritize their own narrow interests at the expense of the Surinamese public, the parliament will remain what it is already at risk of becoming: an institution that does not lead the nation, but is instead led by the unproductive internal power struggles that paralyze it.

  • Government introduces plan to regulate land use in San Cristóbal

    Government introduces plan to regulate land use in San Cristóbal

    In a formal event held at the Loyola Polytechnic Institute in the Dominican Republic, Administrative Modernization Minister José Ignacio Paliza officially launched the long-awaited Municipal Territorial Planning Plan for San Cristóbal. This strategic initiative is designed to bring structured order to the municipality’s urban expansion while safeguarding ecologically critical natural resources through a transparent, clearly defined framework of land-use regulations.

    The San Cristóbal project is not an isolated policy effort. It forms a core part of a nationwide government push to roll out approximately 60 comprehensive territorial planning projects across the country, all carried out in compliance with the national Territorial Planning Law 368-22. This broad program represents a major step forward in institutionalizing systematic spatial development management across the Dominican Republic.

    Government officials emphasized that the plan delivers tangible dual benefits for both private investors and local residents. By codifying explicit rules for what types of development are permitted on different parcels of land, the framework eliminates regulatory uncertainty, cuts red tape for construction and environmental approval processes, and creates a stable environment that encourages responsible investment while protecting community interests. Before the plan is finalized and formally approved, it will enter a period of open public consultation, a requirement that ensures local community members have a direct voice in shaping the long-term trajectory of their municipality.

    A key defining feature of the plan is its commitment to controlled, sustainable urban growth. Rather than allowing sprawling unregulated development into undeveloped natural and agricultural lands, the policy concentrates new urban expansion primarily on existing already-developed areas. Under the final zoning layout, only 10 percent of the municipality’s total land will be classified for urban use, leaving the vast majority of territory reserved for agricultural production, forest conservation, and permanent environmental protection. The plan lays out a 20-year developmental vision extending to 2036, with the goal of establishing San Cristóbal as a national model for sustainable, climate-resilient territorial development. Parallel to this planning initiative, the Dominican government is also advancing separate targeted conservation projects in the region, most notably the ongoing preservation effort for the historically and ecologically significant Pomier Caves system.