分类: politics

  • Column: Delcy, Trump en onze olie

    Column: Delcy, Trump en onze olie

    Venezuelan President Delcy Rodríguez’s upcoming official visit to Suriname has sparked a wave of mixed reactions even before she sets foot on Surinamese soil. Some responses have been sharply critical, while others are outright dismissive of the trip. Critics inside and outside Venezuela have pointed to Rodríguez’s long-standing ties to chavismo, the left-wing movement that has shaped Venezuelan politics for decades; yet paradoxically, other factions within Venezuela have already accused her of betraying chavismo’s core principles by seeking closer ties to former U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration.

    This contradiction lays bare a striking new political reality unfolding across northeast South America. A Venezuelan leader hailing from a movement that built its legitimacy for decades in large part on opposition to U.S. influence is now aligning with a U.S. administration that has openly made reasserting American dominance across the Western Hemisphere a core foreign policy goal. Still, framing Rodríguez’s visit in purely binary positive or negative terms oversimplifies the complex context at play. A far more productive approach is to examine the broader regional transformations underway, and where Suriname positions itself amid this shifting landscape.

    Today, the three neighboring countries of the Guiana Shield are emerging as pivotal players in global energy geopolitics. Venezuela holds the world’s largest proven crude oil reserves. Neighboring Guyana has rapidly transformed itself into a major oil exporter in just a handful of years, and Suriname now stands on the cusp of launching its own offshore oil production. For decades, the international community largely viewed these three nations as small, peripheral players on South America’s northeast coast. Now, the energy reserves lying off their shores and beneath their soil have catapulted the region to new centrality in global geopolitics.

    This shift comes as the U.S. Secretary of State is currently touring Latin America, with a core agenda centered on shoring up Washington’s position and influence across the region. The Trump administration has openly articulated its commitment to advancing explicit U.S. interests across the Western Hemisphere, prioritizing not just trade and security, but also countering the growing influence of China, Russia, and Iran in the region. Against this backdrop, Rodríguez’s visit to Suriname has naturally fueled widespread suspicion among local observers.

    Key questions hang over the trip: What are Washington’s actual strategic goals in this resource-rich region? What weight do the oil reserves of Venezuela, Guyana, and soon Suriname hold in the United States’ evolving regional strategy? And how should we interpret the unexpected alignment between Trump and Rodríguez in this broader context? There is no basis to claim without evidence that Trump is actively targeting Suriname’s oil reserves, nor does hosting Rodríguez automatically mean Suriname is aligning against the U.S. or taking sides in a great power geopolitical clash. Still, it is an undeniable reality that public distrust grows in the absence of transparent information from governing bodies.

    This lack of transparency has defined the lead-up to Rodríguez’s visit. Details of the trip were only released shortly before her scheduled arrival, and little public information has been shared about the agenda for talks or any potential agreements that may be signed. This information gap has created fertile ground for rampant speculation – a particularly charged situation in a country on the brink of entering a new petroleum-powered era, where every meeting with a major foreign political actor carries outsized significance.

    For decades, Suriname has been a small nation that attracted relatively little geopolitical attention from global powers. The discovery of commercial oil reserves is set to upend that reality completely. This does not mean Suriname will emerge as a global power overnight, but it does mean that foreign actors will have growing stakes in the country’s political and economic decisions. To navigate this new landscape, Suriname’s government must pursue a mature, independent foreign policy. As a small state, Suriname cannot afford to limit its diplomatic partnerships to a narrow bloc of allies. It must be able to engage openly with Venezuela, maintain productive dialogue with the United States, and build ties with China, Europe, India, Brazil and other global partners when doing so serves Suriname’s national interests.

    Suriname’s leaders must recognize that diplomacy is not a matter of joining an exclusive club of ideological allies. True foreign policy independence means more than just being willing to sit at the negotiating table with every global power – it means entering those talks with a clear understanding of what Suriname hopes to achieve for its own people. When it comes to Rodríguez’s visit, whether she is a committed chavista, a traitor to the movement, a Trump ally or a pragmatic Venezuelan leader is ultimately not the most pressing question for Suriname. That debate is first and foremost for Venezuelans to resolve among themselves. For Suriname, the only question that truly matters is what Suriname wants to gain from the encounter.

    Core national questions remain unanswered for the public: What is Suriname’s long-term vision for its own oil reserves? What role will the government allow foreign oil companies to play in the sector? How can the country avoid a situation where economic dependence on foreign actors mutates into crippling political dependence? And how can Suriname guarantee that decisions about a natural resource that belongs to all Surinamese people are actually made in the best interests of the Surinamese public? Guyana has already demonstrated how quickly oil can transform a small country’s international standing, and Suriname must confront this new reality head-on.

    Observers in the country must guard against both excessive naivety and ungrounded paranoia. Not every U.S. move in the region is part of a plot to seize Suriname’s oil, and not every Venezuelan overture is an attempt to pull Suriname into a competing geopolitical bloc. At the same time, it would be equally naive to pretend that great powers do not act first to advance their own economic and strategic interests. The United States naturally defends its own interests, as does Venezuela, China, Guyana and every other nation. The question for Suriname is: is the country actively and consistently defending its own?

    When it comes to Rodríguez’s visit, the far more important question than which side Suriname is on is what position Suriname wants to claim for itself in a region that has been reemerged as a geopolitical hotspot thanks to its oil wealth. Rodríguez will leave Suriname after her visit, U.S. cabinet officials will come and go, and even Donald Trump will eventually exit the global political stage. But Suriname’s oil reserves will remain a core part of the country’s future for generations. Suriname cannot afford to let other powers outline its future for its oil wealth before the country defines its own goals.

  • Politiebond wil nationaal veiligheidsplan voor eigen korps

    Politiebond wil nationaal veiligheidsplan voor eigen korps

    Suriname’s newly installed leadership of the Suriname Police Union (SPB), headed by chair Revelino Eijk, has laid out an aggressive policy agenda for its term, centered on drafting a landmark national internal security plan for the national police force that addresses long-unresolved workplace hazards, flawed operational protocols, and public image damage.

    The Eijk-led board officially took office Wednesday during a special general members’ assembly, following a formal handover ceremony. Eijk first assumed the union’s top role in 2025, succeeding Poetini Atompai, who stepped down to enter politics and now holds a seat in Suriname’s National Assembly. This term marks the third consecutive time the Renewal Movement, the faction founded in 2016 by Atompai, Sergio Gentle and Raoul Hellings, has secured control of the police union’s leadership.

    In his opening address to members, Eijk acknowledged that meaningful progress had been achieved by the previous leadership, but emphasized the new board’s ambition to deliver greater gains for rank-and-file officers both within the police organization and in field operations. He also updated members on ongoing salary negotiations, confirming that no agreement has yet been reached between the Surinamese government and security sector unions on a proposed 15% pay raise, with talks still ongoing. Beyond base salary increases, the union is also pushing for substantial raises to inadequate job-specific allowances: Eijk noted that a current allowance for judicial assistant officers currently stands at just 183 Surinamese dollars, while the annual risk allowance for officers is only 570 Surinamese dollars.

    At the top of the new board’s priority list is the creation of the first national internal security plan for the national police. Eijk stressed that the plan is not focused on high-profile field equipment like bulletproof vests, but on addressing dangerous, long-neglected conditions that officers face every day inside police stations themselves.

    “What we see is that the safety of our people in their own workplaces is not guaranteed,” Eijk told attendees. “We have buildings that can barely be called police stations anymore: ceilings that are at risk of collapsing, rampant rat infestations, bat droppings falling into work areas, sewage that bubbles up into the station every time it rains. Officers are working on broken chairs that leave them with chronic back pain.”

    Eijk added that many stations lack even the most basic safety infrastructure and emergency protocols. Some stations do not have working fire extinguishers, and there are no clear action plans for emergencies in cell blocks. “Officers work in cell blocks every day, but they have no idea what to do if a fire breaks out,” he said. “There is no documented workflow, no official protocol, no evacuation plan. What is an officer supposed to do? Should they open all the cells? Who should they call? No one knows.”

    The proposed national security plan will also establish clear, standardized protocols for handling, storing and securing seized evidence and contraband. Eijk pointed out current dangerous gaps in existing practices: for example, seized gas cylinders are often stored in enclosed indoor spaces, when they should be kept in open, ventilated areas. He also cited a case where a truck loaded with illegal, hazardous chemicals is being guarded by officers with no protective measures in place to guard their health.

    Beyond safety risks, clear protocols for seized goods will also reduce the risk of theft and unfair scrutiny of officers, Eijk explained. Without clear guidelines, officers are sometimes wrongfully implicated in investigations into missing seized property even when they had no involvement in the disappearance. “There are no clear written guidelines or protocols for how these tasks should be done,” he said. “We have thought through these issues. This is about our safety, our health. That is why a national security plan must be created.”

    Another core priority for the new SPB leadership is repairing the badly damaged public image of the Suriname Police Corps. Eijk said the force’s reputation has suffered severe dents in recent years, describing it as “dented over and over again.” He called on all officers to hold themselves and their colleagues accountable, urging intervention when any member — whether a union member or not — is at risk of misconduct.

    Noting that numerous integrity violations have already occurred within the force, Eijk emphasized that restoring public trust in the police must start from within the institution itself.

  • Dominica to appoint envoy for UK and EU visa talks

    Dominica to appoint envoy for UK and EU visa talks

    Against a backdrop of mounting diplomatic tensions over visa rules and controversial citizenship schemes, the Prime Minister of Dominica, Roosevelt Skerrit, has revealed plans to name a dedicated special envoy to streamline the island nation’s diplomatic interactions with the United Kingdom and the European Union.

    This diplomatic push comes in direct response to two major recent developments that have put Dominica’s cross-border travel privileges at risk. First, the United Kingdom unilaterally introduced new visa requirements for Dominican citizens, prompting ongoing negotiations between the two governments to reverse the policy and restore visa-free access. Second, the European Union has raised formal security and due diligence red flags over Dominica’s Citizenship by Investment (CBI) programme, which allows foreign investors to gain citizenship in exchange for significant economic investment. Alongside four other Caribbean nations, Dominica has been given a deadline of June 1, 2028, to shut down the CBI initiative, or face potential revocation of its visa-free travel status across the entire Schengen Area.

    According to Skerrit, the newly appointed envoy will take full ownership of leading and coordinating Dominica’s diplomatic advocacy with both British and EU institutional officials. In remarks confirming the plan, the Prime Minister noted that constructive discussions with the UK government are still ongoing, and the formal announcement of the envoy’s appointment is expected to come in the next few weeks. Skerrit has not yet released any details about the candidate being considered for this key diplomatic posting, as negotiations and internal preparations remain ongoing.

    For Dominica, retaining visa-free access to both the UK and Schengen Area is a critical national priority, supporting the island’s tourism sector, cross-border business activity, and mobility for its citizens. The CBI programme has also been a major source of foreign revenue for the small Caribbean economy, making the EU’s demand an economically sensitive issue for the government. The special envoy’s role will be to balance addressing European security concerns while protecting the nation’s core economic and travel interests through targeted diplomatic negotiation.

  • Government to hand over 16 new homes in Woodford Hill

    Government to hand over 16 new homes in Woodford Hill

    As the Dominican administration advances its flagship national affordable housing initiative, 16 households across Woodford Hill are just days away from receiving keys to brand-new, three-bedroom residential units, marking the latest milestone in the country’s effort to expand access to safe, secure housing for all citizens.

    Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit confirmed the upcoming September 11 handover during a Wednesday press briefing, noting that this latest distribution follows closely on the heels of a recent transfer that put 11 completed housing units into the hands of eligible families in the Canefield East area. The Canefield East development is one segment of a much larger planned rollout that will see 204 total homes and apartments distributed to qualifying residents across nine separate communities across the country.

    Skerrit outlined that the government’s national housing framework is rooted in a core guiding principle: every Dominican, regardless of their income level or personal background, deserves the chance to reside in a home that keeps them safe and secure. To advance this goal, program administrators have prioritized vulnerable groups for housing access, including at-risk families, single-parent households, elderly residents, people displaced by natural disasters, and individuals who lack the means to secure adequate housing on their own.

    The Prime Minister openly acknowledged that unmet demand for housing support remains high across the country, with thousands of eligible applicants still waiting for assistance through the programme. “As resources become available, we will continue to respond in a fair and systematic manner, ensuring that assistance reaches those with the greatest need,” Skerrit stated.

    In addition to the construction of new units, the national initiative also includes ongoing work on housing repair programs and other forms of residential assistance for low- and middle-income Dominican households. Skerrit emphasized that the administration will not scale back the programme despite facing public criticism, pointing to the proven social and economic benefits of stable housing, which he said strengthens family units, reduces vulnerability, and raises overall quality of life for communities across the nation.

  • Sherman Boston calls for action on poverty following Roseau North by-election

    Sherman Boston calls for action on poverty following Roseau North by-election

    Following the finalization of vote counting for the Roseau North By-Election held on September 7, 2026, Sherman Boston — a Dominican building contractor, local municipal politician and long-time community organizer — has reaffirmed his commitment to pushing for heightened public focus on entrenched poverty and expanded social empowerment across the Commonwealth of Dominica.

    Despite the end of his electoral campaign, Boston made clear in post-election comments that his advocacy work on the issues he frames as make-or-break for Dominica’s long-term future will not slow down, regardless of his final position in the poll results. He emphasized that his mission to share his message with the Dominican public will continue as long as he is able, declaring forcefully: “As long as I have life and breath, I have a message to spread.”

    Boston argued that Dominica’s current policy trajectory demands far more public scrutiny than it currently receives, saying the severity of the country’s most pressing challenges has flown under the radar of both national leadership and many ordinary citizens. As an independent candidate in the by-election, he singled out widespread poverty as his top policy priority, framing the issue as far more than a purely economic failing.

    In striking remarks, Boston called poverty “not just a crime, it is a sin,” and issued a direct appeal to the Dominica government to treat growing economic hardship among the population with the urgency it deserves. He pushed back against the practice of forcing citizens into precarious economic positions then exploiting that vulnerability for political gain, stressing that “that is not the function of a government.”

    Instead, Boston said, the core responsibility of elected leadership is to build accessible pathways that allow all citizens to lift themselves out of hardship and make tangible contributions to national development. “We are supposed to be there to empower people and uplift citizens,” he added.

    Beyond economic inequality, Boston also questioned the morality of a national landscape marked by widespread systemic poverty and chronically limited access to quality educational opportunities for low-income communities. He closed by urging all Dominican citizens to educate themselves on the challenges facing their local communities, and to reflect critically on the direction of the country’s leadership.

  • Five Colombians accommodated in Roseau return home

    Five Colombians accommodated in Roseau return home

    In a formal press briefing held Wednesday, Dominican Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit announced the successful conclusion of the first iteration of his country’s third-country national resettlement arrangement with the United States, confirming that all five Colombians admitted to the Caribbean nation under the deal have voluntarily returned to their home country.

    The program, which calls for Dominica to accept between five and seven third-country migrants per quarter at the request of the U.S. government, faced an early hurdle when Washington’s first candidate list failed to meet the Dominican government’s vetting requirements. Skerrit explained that Dominica’s administration requested additional background information on the individuals included in the initial submission, which U.S. authorities were unable to provide at that time, leading the Dominican government to reject the entire first slate of candidates.

    A second revised list, which included the full background details Dominica required, was subsequently shared by U.S. officials. From that list, Dominica’s government selected five candidates, all of whom were Colombian nationals, and confirmed that none of the selected individuals carried any criminal records.

    During their stay in Dominica, the five Colombians were housed in a local hotel, provided with three meals a day, and given full access to basic public and commercial services, Skerrit detailed. He noted that the group was even able to move about freely for leisure, including shopping trips and visits to local personal service providers such as barbers. Upon their arrival in Dominica, the government offered all five the immediate option to return to Colombia, and every person unanimously chose to repatriate, according to Skerrit. The entire process from admission to departure unfolded much faster than anticipated, the prime minister added.

    As of the press conference, there are no third-country nationals currently staying in Dominica under the bilateral arrangement. To oversee the logistical and operational components of the agreement, the Dominican government has contracted the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) to manage all resettlement and repatriation activities on its behalf. Skerrit also confirmed that the United States has covered all costs associated with the care and processing of the five migrants during their stay in Dominica.

    Looking ahead, Skerrit stressed that all future U.S. requests for resettlement will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, in line with the terms of the existing bilateral agreement and Dominica’s established vetting criteria for admitting individuals.

  • Foreign illegal gold miners arrested in Potaro

    Foreign illegal gold miners arrested in Potaro

    Guyana’s Ministry of Natural Resources announced on Thursday that five non-citizens, a group that includes multiple Venezuelan nationals, have been taken into custody by the Guyana Police Force as part of the government’s sweeping ongoing campaign to eliminate unauthorized mineral extraction across the country. The detentions followed the successful discovery of an unlicensed mining operation operating within the country’s key Potaro mining district.

    During the coordinated enforcement raid, officials seized multiple pieces of heavy and light mining equipment, alongside an undisclosed quantity of processed gold that was extracted illegally from the site. Photos released alongside the ministry’s announcement show law enforcement personnel and officers from the Guyana Geology and Mines Commission (GGMC)’s Corps of Wardens examining the contraband seized during the operation.

    Per the ministry’s official statement, the case is currently under active joint investigation by the GGMC’s enforcement division and the Guyana Police Force, with both agencies working to map out the full scope of the illegal operation and any additional actors connected to it.

    In a strong reaffirmation of the government’s policy stance, the Ministry of Natural Resources emphasized that unauthorized mining activities will not be tolerated anywhere within Guyana’s borders. The administration reminded all active miners, industry stakeholders, and foreign actors seeking to operate in Guyana’s mining sector that all extractive operations must secure all legally required permits and approvals before commencing work, and must adhere strictly to both the country’s mining regulations and national environmental protection laws at all times.

    The ministry confirmed that coordinated enforcement and surveillance operations will continue across all of Guyana’s mining districts, carried out by the GGMC in partnership with national law enforcement agencies. “Individuals found to be operating in violation of Guyana’s laws will face the full weight of legal consequences,” the statement read. Officials also explicitly noted that any non-national found to be involved in illegal mining activity will face deportation after legal process is completed, a policy that has already been applied to previous violators.

  • Senator Phillip Shoul Rebuts Malaka Parker’s Criticism of UWI Law Classes at ABLP Headquarters

    Senator Phillip Shoul Rebuts Malaka Parker’s Criticism of UWI Law Classes at ABLP Headquarters

    A sharp political debate has broken out in Antigua and Barbuda over a controversial plan to temporarily host law classes for the University of the West Indies (UWI) Five Islands Campus at People’s Place, the official headquarters of the governing Antigua and Barbuda Labour Party (ABLP). The conflict emerged after opposition Senator Malaka Parker published a scathing commentary attacking the proposal, prompting a forceful rebuttal from government Senator Phillip Shoul.

    Parker, a member of the opposition United Progressive Party (UPP), laid out a series of principled objections to the venue selection. While she openly acknowledged that expanding local legal education would cut study costs for domestic students from Antigua and Barbuda, she argued that these practical benefits do not outweigh the institutional risks of hosting a university programme in a major political party’s headquarters. Parker emphasized that her concerns are not related to the size, amenities, location, or free availability of the space – the core issue, she insisted, is the venue’s inherent partisan identity that makes it fundamentally unsuitable for an independent academic institution.

    “A political party headquarters does not become an appropriate university campus simply because space is available,” Parker stated in her commentary. She warned that holding law classes at the site would surround students with partisan symbols, political events, and party figures, opening the door to risks of political recruitment, ideological indoctrination, and unfair treatment of students who affiliate with other parties or hold no political alignment. Parker stressed that no student should ever be forced to enter the governing party’s headquarters to access a public education, and questioned whether UWI would ever consider holding classes at the opposition UPP’s headquarters to test the fairness of the arrangement.

    Parker underscored that the stakes are particularly high for this cohort of law students, who will go on to work as attorneys, prosecutors, judges, and legislators – roles that require unwavering commitment to judicial independence, ethical decision-making, and the rule of law. She called on UWI leadership to immediately and clearly reject the proposed venue, publicly disclose how the plan was developed, and select a politically neutral alternative, ranging from public government buildings and existing educational institutions to commercial conference centres or temporary modular classroom facilities.

    In a detailed, point-by-point response, Shoul dismissed all of Parker’s claims as baseless speculation rooted in partisan political opposition, and accused the UPP of launching a coordinated attack to undermine the reputation of UWI itself. Shoul drew a clear line between temporary use of vacant space for academic instruction and ceding institutional control of the university to a political party, arguing that the two scenarios are entirely distinct.

    He challenged Parker repeatedly to produce concrete evidence that the ABLP has any involvement in student admissions, or plans to interfere with the curriculum, teaching, or student experience at the programme. “Holding classes in a particular building does not mean students are being recruited, indoctrinated, politically screened or required to support the organization associated with that building,” Shoul explained. He noted that Parker has failed to prove any claim that the party would control UWI operations, pressure lecturers, influence student political beliefs, display partisan materials in classroom spaces, discriminate against non-ABLP supporters, or tie access to education to political affiliation.

    Shoul pushed back particularly hard against an inflammatory comparison Parker made between the ABLP headquarters and venues tied to illegal activities like prostitution, gambling, and gang activity. He called that comparison a deliberate attempt to smear both UWI and the ABLP’s headquarters by falsely linking the facility to criminal and disreputable activity, labeling the rhetoric damaging and intentionally provocative.

    According to Shoul, the only relevant questions about the proposal focus on four core criteria: whether UWI will retain full, unfettered control over its academic programme, whether all students will receive equal, unrestricted access to classes, whether teaching spaces will be kept free of partisan political material, and whether both lecturers and students will be protected from unwanted political interference. “If the answers are yes, then the argument should be based on facts rather than fear and political rhetoric,” he said.

    Shoul acknowledged that it is reasonable to debate whether People’s Place is the ideal long-term venue for the programme, but stressed that disagreement over the location does not equal proof of corruption or improper political influence. He rejected the claim that law students will automatically develop compromised political values simply by attending classes in the building, and challenged Parker to show that any enrolled student has actually raised concerns about the arrangement. “Disagree with the location if you wish, but disagreement should not be dressed up as proof of corruption,” Shoul concluded.

  • Electoral reform delays did not compromise Dominica’s democracy, says the prime minister

    Electoral reform delays did not compromise Dominica’s democracy, says the prime minister

    At a press conference held this Wednesday, Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit of Dominica pushed back firmly against opposition claims that the island nation’s democracy has been weakened by the passage of 2025 electoral reform legislation. The opposition has alleged that parliamentary lawmakers knowingly approved the electoral bills despite awareness that the independent Constitutional body tasked with rolling out the new rules — the Electoral Commission — was not prepared to implement the new provisions. Skerrit labeled these allegations as baseless, false, and rooted purely in political opportunism, emphasizing that the entire controversy has not undermined the health of Dominica’s democratic system in any way.

    Addressing lingering public questions about the state of the country’s electoral process following the March 2025 passage of the reform laws, Skerrit reiterated his long-held position that the Electoral Commission’s earlier decision to suspend continuous voter registration lacked legal grounding. He clarified that as prime minister, he exercises no direct control over the commission, which is granted full independent authority under the Dominica Constitution. Even with that being said, Skerrit stressed that the commission’s missteps have not opened the door to democratic erosion.

    The prime minister pointed to the delayed rollout of the national voter ID card system as one clear example of an administrative error that critics have blown out of proportion. He argued this delay has had no tangible impact on the integrity of the electoral process or the state of the country’s democracy, contrary to opposition narratives.

    Skerrit also addressed the gap in new and confirmed voter registrations: roughly 23,000 voters have been confirmed so far, compared to the more than 40,000 votes cast in the 2019 general election. He claimed this gap is not the result of institutional mismanagement or voter suppression, but rather stems from opposition leaders’ deliberate campaign over the first 10 months of the voter confirmation process. The opposition, he noted, repeatedly criticized the process and openly instructed their supporters to refuse to complete confirmation, a strategy that suppressed participation. At the same time, Skerrit acknowledged that the opposition holds a democratic right to share guidance with their base, just as supporters hold the right to accept or reject that guidance, noting that all of these actions fall squarely within the bounds of normal democratic practice.

    The prime minister also pushed back on claims that a recent amendment to the electoral laws — passed on the seventh of last month — is proof the original bills were unready for implementation and a stain on Dominica’s democracy. He called this argument absurd, mischievous, and unfair, explaining that legislative amendments during the implementation phase are a routine occurrence in parliaments across the globe. Skerrit confirmed that elections could technically have proceeded without the amendment, but the Electoral Commission itself requested the legislative change to eliminate any ambiguity around the new rules and clarify legal language to avoid misinterpretation. The government simply honored that request by bringing the amendment to parliament.

    Skerrit concluded by rejecting the opposition’s overarching narrative that the supposed electoral reform has instead devolved into confusion, administrative inefficiency, and widespread voter suppression. He called this claim a dangerously false story manufactured by opposition leaders to undermine public trust in the integrity of the upcoming electoral process. According to the prime minister, the response from residents of Roseau North and the broader Dominican public has already sent a clear message rejecting these unfounded claims.

  • Fonseca: “Our People Are Struggling to Afford the Basics”

    Fonseca: “Our People Are Struggling to Afford the Basics”

    On September 10, 2026, Francis Fonseca — Belize’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade, Education, Culture, Science and Technology — took the keynote stage at the 228th anniversary commemoration of the Battle of St George’s Caye in Belize City, where he laid out a sweeping policy agenda centered on addressing urgent economic hardships facing ordinary Belizeans and charting a more resilient path for national development.

    Opening his address, Fonseca tied national sovereignty directly to the economic well-being of everyday citizens, arguing that a nation cannot claim full sovereignty when large swathes of its population cannot access basic necessities. He openly acknowledged the mounting pressure that skyrocketing fuel expenses, sustained food price inflation, and soaring utility bills have placed on households across both rural and urban Belize, admitting that the government’s current support packages are not sufficient to reverse the strain on working and vulnerable families.

    “Existing targeted social protection measures and cost of living relief have helped soften the blow, but we recognize we must go further,” Fonseca stated. He called for a rapid expansion of cross-cutting poverty alleviation initiatives that will reach at-risk families in every corner of the country, strengthening direct social safety nets that cover core needs including food, healthcare, education, and essential public services.

    To stabilize prices for basic goods, Fonseca proposed a set of practical, targeted policy interventions: bringing down the cost of core items in the average household food basket, taming volatility in electricity pricing, and mitigating the impact of unpredictable global fuel markets. He also emphasized the critical role of boosting domestic food production, noting that empowering local small-scale farmers and fisherfolk to increase output would cut Belize’s costly dependence on imported food, which in turn would lower prices for consumers at local marketplaces across the country.

    Turning to his second core policy area — education reform — Fonseca detailed plans to overhaul Belize’s outdated curriculum to align with 21st century economic needs, prioritizing the development of critical thinking skills, universal digital literacy, and expanded technical and vocational education tracks that prepare students for in-demand jobs. Alongside curriculum modernization, he committed to eliminating financial barriers to secondary and post-secondary education, ensuring that no young Belizean is blocked from pursuing their potential due to an inability to pay schooling costs.

    Finally, Fonseca called for bold, far-reaching economic reform to reduce Belize’s long-standing reliance on its two traditional economic pillars: tourism and agriculture. He laid out plans to support homegrown entrepreneurs through expanded access to microfinancing, cutting burdensome bureaucratic red tape that slows small business growth, and building dedicated business incubators to support small enterprises and emerging young innovators. To build a more resilient national economy, he urged the country to embrace fast-growing emerging sectors including the blue economy (ocean-based industries), green economy (sustainable renewable energy and conservation), and orange economy (creative and cultural industries), emphasizing that future economic growth must be inclusive, reaching every family and particularly those in historically underserved marginalized communities.