分类: politics

  • PSU President Accuses Accountant General of “Passing the Buck”

    PSU President Accuses Accountant General of “Passing the Buck”

    As a national audit ordered by Prime Minister John Briceño moves forward, a public dispute over transparency in controversial government payment records has intensified, with the head of Belize’s largest public sector labor organization leveling sharp criticism at top financial oversight officials.

    The controversy centers on the government’s SmartStream payment platform, where the Public Service Union (PSU) has alleged widespread intentional circumvention of Treasury safeguards: the union claims senior finance officials have systematically split large public contracts into individual payments valued under $10,000, the threshold that triggers mandatory official oversight. This questionable practice has already been linked to nepotism claims involving relatives of Home Affairs Minister Oscar Mira, prompting the PSU to file a formal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for full access to the relevant records.

    In the latest development, PSU President Dean Flowers says he has received unsatisfactory responses from both the Office of the Accountant General and the Auditor General, leaving the union no closer to obtaining the public records it is seeking.

    Speaking on the issue, Flowers revealed that the Accountant General’s response essentially defers all responsibility for the request to the Auditor General, a move he describes as blatant buck-passing. “She refused to confirm whether she would even review the SmartStream system, flag the problematic payment patterns used by financial officers, or release the names of the officials involved in these practices,” Flowers explained. The Auditor General, for its part, has echoed a common line: it claims releasing any information to the union would jeopardize the ongoing, prime minister-ordered audit.

    Flowers has rejected this justification outright, arguing that public access to established factual evidence cannot undermine an official investigation. “Evidence is evidence regardless of who holds it,” he noted. The PSU leader also suggested that the coordinated stonewalling from both oversight offices bears the clear mark of legal direction from the Attorney General’s Ministry.

    In a surprising addendum to his criticism, Flowers also voiced disappointment with the response of the Accountant General, a woman appointed to the senior leadership role. The PSU president emphasized that he is a strong proponent of increasing women’s representation in top government positions, but said it is disheartening to see appointees prioritize protecting the existing political status quo over upholding the public’s right to transparency and accountability.

    For its part, the Office of the Accountant General has stated it will cooperate fully with the ongoing government audit, a commitment that has done little to defuse the PSU’s demands for public disclosure of the records tied to the alleged nepotism and rule-breaking.

  • Integrity Commission Says “Any Person” Can File a Corruption Complaint

    Integrity Commission Says “Any Person” Can File a Corruption Complaint

    As a high-profile corruption scandal involving senior Belizean government official continues to unfold, the country’s Integrity Commission has moved to clarify the public’s right to report suspected corrupt activity, reaffirming that any member of the public can file formal complaints that will trigger statutory investigations under existing Belizean law.

    The controversy centers on Oscar Mira, Belize’s Minister of Home Affairs, after leaked financial documents revealed that multiple members of Mira’s immediate family have received hundreds of thousands of dollars in government payments over recent months. The biggest transaction recorded is nearly $400,000 in public funds paid to MP Farms, a company owned by Mira’s brother Brian. To avoid formal high-value procurement oversight, the payments were split into dozens of individual invoices each valued under the $10,000 reporting threshold – a structuring move that has sparked widespread allegations of rule-breaking. Additional scrutiny has also fallen on past public payments to Mira’s sister Jenny, as well as reported government ties to another of the minister’s brothers, Stanley, deepening public anger and mistrust over the family’s extensive undisclosed financial links to state contracts.

    In response to growing media and public attention on the case, News Five contacted newly appointed Integrity Commission chair Andrea McSweeney-McKoy for comment. McSweeney-McKoy declined to issue specific comment on the Mira case, citing legal requirements that all commission corruption investigations remain strictly confidential under the body’s governing legislation. However, she used the opportunity to outline the commission’s formal complaint process for the public, drawing attention to the statutory procedures laid out in Sections 34 through 42 of the Integrity Commission Act that activate immediately after any person files a complaint alleging corrupt activity.

    McSweeney-McKoy emphasized that any individual who suspects an act of corruption has occurred is eligible to submit a complaint to the commission. Once filed, complaints go through a structured process of review and investigation; after completing its assessment, the commission can issue a finding, or refer the matter to a formal public inquiry or dedicated law enforcement investigative body. She also confirmed that the commission will publish a full, step-by-step guide to the complaints process on its official social media channels in the near future to improve public access.

    The Integrity Commission’s clarification comes shortly after Prime Minister John Briceño announced plans for an independent external review of all government payments linked to Mira’s relatives. Speaking to reporters in Orange Walk Town this past Thursday, Briceño said he has directed the Financial Secretary to partner with the Auditor General to conduct a full audit of the contested transactions. The prime minister noted that the audit will focus on two core questions: whether all required procurement protocols were properly followed, and whether the government received fair value for the public funds spent. He added that he would not pre-judge the outcome of the review, and all further action will be determined by the audit’s final findings.

    For his part, Minister Mira has issued a public denial of any wrongdoing, insisting he never used his position to influence the awarding of government contracts to family members. He told the public that he does not serve on any government procurement committees, and has no direct input or influence over contract awarding processes.

    Back in March, the Integrity Commission publicly reminded citizens that corruption is defined as a criminal offense under Belizean law. The commission’s definition of corruption extends far beyond direct bribes of cash: it covers any act of giving or receiving an improper advantage, unfair manipulation of government decisions, and improper interference in public contracting. Improper advantage can include non-monetary benefits such as gifts, property, preferential employment terms, or any other form of special treatment.

  • Bruce touts new export deals, higher prices for farmers after US visit

    Bruce touts new export deals, higher prices for farmers after US visit

    St. Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG) Agriculture Minister Israel Bruce has unveiled a suite of new export agreements, financing frameworks, and digital trade infrastructure designed to unlock higher incomes, expand market access, and strengthen the country’s agricultural sector following two weeks of diplomatic and trade missions to California and Barbados. The minister made the announcements during a press briefing held in Kingstown this Thursday, tying the new initiatives directly to campaign pledges made by the incoming New Democratic Party administration ahead of the 2025 elections.

    The centerpiece of Bruce’s announcement is a newly signed memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the SVG government, U.S.-based Happy Produce Global LLC and Quantum Inc. that establishes a formal framework for dasheen exports to the United States. Under the terms of the agreement, local dasheen producers will be guaranteed a minimum price of 100 Eastern Caribbean (EC) dollars per sack – a dramatic increase from the current average rate of just 40 EC dollars per sack.

    Bruce emphasized that the guaranteed minimum price addresses a longstanding unsustainable dynamic for local producers, who have long struggled to recoup basic production costs including planting materials, crop maintenance, harvesting, and transportation under the existing pricing structure. The minister clarified that the MOU lays the foundational market framework rather than serving as a final commercial contract. A local purchasing agent will next negotiate a formal commercial agreement with Happy Produce Global, and that agent will in turn sign individual supply commitments with participating dasheen farmers to ensure consistent inventory for U.S. retail partners, who require steady stock to avoid empty shelf gaps.

    When asked whether the new higher export pricing would negatively impact local consumers and regional agricultural traders, locally referred to as “traffickers,” Bruce acknowledged the concerns and noted that he has scheduled a meeting with these stakeholders for the coming week to work through ongoing challenges and reconcile conflicting needs.

    Alongside the dasheen agreement, Bruce announced a second MOU for hot pepper exports, signed with U.S.-based Seasons Farm Fresh and Quantum Inc. To address existing concerns that the new export deal would divert local pepper supply away from Vinci Fresh, a domestic producer of sauces and condiments that relies on local pepper crops, Bruce stressed that the initiative is structured to expand overall national pepper production rather than redirect existing supply. Farmers participating in the program, which includes support for seeds and land preparation, will be required to sign binding contracts to sell their entire output from supported plots to Seasons Farm Fresh, preventing poaching of contracted supply by third-party buyers offering slightly higher per-pound rates. Bruce linked this new pepper initiative to recent technical assistance work carried out by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), which deployed a production consultant to SVG for 10 days of on-the-ground collaboration with local pepper growers just two months prior.

    A key supporting innovation accompanying both export MOUs is a new digital agricultural trade platform being developed by Quantum Inc. The platform is designed to connect SVG producers directly with international buyers, cutting out unnecessary middlemen and automating cross-border payment processes. Under the proposed escrow-based payment system, international buyers deposit agreed-upon funds into a secured escrow account before shipment. Once the SVG farmer delivers the produce for export, Quantum releases full payment directly to the producer, eliminating long payment delays and reducing the risk of non-payment. The platform will also streamline proceeds distribution for bulk shipments that combine produce from multiple smallholder farmers. Bruce noted that Quantum has already made significant progress adapting the platform to meet the specific needs of Vincentian producers, and hinted that the system will eventually integrate with a forthcoming National Agricultural Management Information System (NAMIS) and new national farmer identification program, with additional details to be released at a later date.

    Bruce closed the briefing by recognizing Kishorn Cupid, a SVG expatriate based in Los Angeles, who personally provided partial funding for the California trade mission, hailing Cupid as a goodwill ambassador for the country’s agricultural sector.

  • PM pledges to tackle ‘substandard’ conditions for public servants

    PM pledges to tackle ‘substandard’ conditions for public servants

    In his inaugural address at the annual Public Service Week Thanksgiving Service held in Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines Prime Minister Godwin Friday has delivered a landmark dual-message speech that confronts longstanding systemic challenges in the country’s public sector. The newly sworn-in premier, whose administration took office on November 28, openly acknowledged that thousands of public servants across the nation are currently forced to carry out their duties in severely deficient, even life-endangering work environments — and called for shared accountability to drive progress.

    Friday opened by reframing the core identity of public service, pushing back against harmful cultural narratives rooted in the nation’s history of slavery that have tied service to the stigma of servitude. Speaking to the gathering of public officers under the event’s theme “Transforming Public Institutions: Advancing Innovation, Participation and Inclusion”, he emphasized that public service is fundamentally a calling to support fellow citizens. “We are called to serve, and it’s incumbent upon us to do our very best in whatever our roles are,” he told attendees. “Service means being a help to your neighbour, to your friend, to the people who have a right to expect us to do our best for them.”

    He lauded public servants as the backbone of the country’s economy, describing them as some of the “best educated, most talented, hardworking, dedicated people in St. Vincent and the Grenadines”. Friday noted that the consistent work of public employees lays the foundational framework that enables private sector growth and broader national economic activity.

    Tying the country’s ongoing economic challenges — including heavy national debt and persistent fiscal pressures — to public sector performance, the prime minister argued that boosting productivity within government agencies is a critical step to improving national financial health. “Productivity is what creates whatever the surplus is, the increase in wealth that helps to deal with all of those things. That can be done within the public service as well, because you set the context of what everybody else does out there,” he explained.

    Friday urged public officers to eliminate unnecessary delays that stall services for citizens and private businesses, warning that bureaucratic procrastination acts as a dead weight on the entire national economy. He acknowledged that frontline workers often face overwhelming frustration when tackling persistent, unresolved problems, but stressed that unprofessional or dismissive interactions with the public fail to meet the obligations of public service. Echoing a prior appeal from Deputy Prime Minister and Public Service Minister St. Clair Leacock, Friday called on all public employees to “lift your game”, saying, “Let us decide that we are going to do better. Imagine if all of us decide to lift our game.”

    He reinforced that citizens accessing public services are not asking for special favors, but exercising the rights they have earned as taxpayers, and are inherently entitled to high-quality, timely support. Framing the work of public service in both moral and spiritual terms, he added that each workday represents both a blessing and a core obligation to serve the public good.

    In some of his most sharply critical remarks, the prime minister turned to the dire physical working conditions he has personally observed across government facilities since taking office. “I’ve seen it. I’ve seen enough to know that we have to put our best foot forward, as well, as permanent secretaries, as ministers, as the people who are in charge of the various offices that you inhabit,” he said.

    He specifically called out the dilapidated housing at the decommissioned police training school in Old Montrose, where serving officers still reside. He described the conditions at the site as “terrible”, noting that plans to demolish and rehabilitate the complex were first drafted back in 2016, but have languished for years without progress. Quoting John Lennon’s famous line that “life is what happens when you’re making plans”, Friday criticized the prolonged delay: “Those plans have been under work since 2016 and people are still required to come to work and to give of their best when we tell them, by the conditions in which we ask them to work, that we don’t value you. That is not fair, it’s not right. And it bothered me.”

    The prime minister stressed that poor conditions are not isolated to the police service, adding that police facilities are simply the worst affected. Even the central administrative complex that houses the prime minister’s own offices, he noted, falls far short of acceptable standards. Friday went on to confirm that many workplaces across the public sector pose direct risks to employee health: “It’s a health hazard to have people working in mouldy buildings, and that’s happening all over the public service. It’s demeaning to tell somebody to work out of a closet rather than an office, to tell them to work in the corridors because we don’t have space for you.”

    Against this backdrop, Friday issued a formal public commitment to partner with public servants to improve their working environments, even amid the government’s tight fiscal constraints. “We are going to be a partner with you to ensure that we do our very best within the limited resources we have to provide better conditions to you, so that you can do your work and so that you can be productive,” he said, adding that “money isn’t everything” when it comes to meaningful reform.

    The prime minister announced his administration will pursue a wide range of creative solutions to upgrade public facilities, and signaled he is willing to face political criticism for the steps his government will take. “I don’t care what people say. I’m going to do it, because I know what we’re doing is … going to help you, it’s going to help the country, it’s going to help everybody,” he said.

    Addressing potential critics and naysayers, he closed by reaffirming the shared goal of progress: “For those who are naysayers and want to find fault and pick faults for everything, watch the result and you will see that we are going to deliver for you as public servants, and we ask you, lift your game. Let us deliver for the people of this country. They deserve nothing less.”

  • Defining deportees

    Defining deportees

    A heated public debate has erupted around a new bilateral memorandum of understanding (MOU) between Jamaica and the United States focused on the transfer of third-country nationals (TCNs), with top Jamaican officials doubling down on efforts to clarify that the incoming individuals are not deportees. Prime Minister Dr. Andrew Holness used a public social media statement to reinforce the administration’s core position, emphasizing that Jamaica has not agreed to accept foreign deportees removed from the United States under this new framework.

    The controversy ignited just days after Jamaica’s Minister of National Security Dr. Horace Chang publicly confirmed that the agreement had been finalized, triggering widespread scrutiny over the terms and scope of the transfer arrangement. Chang has repeatedly pushed back against labeling the transferred individuals as deportees, a distinction that Holness has now publicly reaffirmed.

    In his statement, Holness made clear that the only deportees Jamaica currently accepts are Jamaican citizens returning to their home country under longstanding existing bilateral agreements between the two nations. This clarification followed detailed comments Chang provided during a post-Cabinet media briefing, where he outlined the strict operational limits built into the new MOU. Under the terms of the deal, Jamaica will accept no more than 25 TCNs every two weeks, and all transfers will be paused immediately if more than 10 transferred individuals remain on the island at any given time.

    Chang explained that the arrangement applies exclusively to TCNs who have already exhausted all legal pathways to remain in the United States, but whose home countries are either unwilling or unable to take them back. He stressed that the term “deportee” does not apply here because a deportation formally involves sending an individual back to their country of citizenship, so framing these transit migrants as deportees creates a misleading public perception. To address public concerns, Chang confirmed that every potential transferee will undergo rigorous vetting before Jamaica approves their entry, with full access to identity, medical, and criminal history records provided in advance.

    Speaking during a sitting of Jamaica’s House of Representatives, Chang further clarified that the MOU is not a permanent resettlement program. He noted that transferred individuals will only stay in Jamaica temporarily as the government coordinates their onward travel, whether that means eventual repatriation to their country of origin or transfer to another appropriate third country. Jamaica also retains full unilateral discretion to approve or reject any individual transferee on a case-by-case basis, he added.

    However, the Jamaican government’s strict distinction between TCNs and deportees has been called into question by global human rights group Amnesty International. The London-based organization, which works globally to protect migrant and refugee rights, defines third-country removals as a policy that sends people the U.S. wants to expel from its territory to countries that are not their own, regardless of their ultimate destination. Amnesty has also flagged broader longstanding concerns about third-country removal policies, including risks to due process for migrants and potential gaps in humane treatment after they arrive in the transit country.

  • Jamaicans in US raise concerns over TCN deal

    Jamaicans in US raise concerns over TCN deal

    Amid growing scrutiny from the Jamaican diaspora community in New York City, a coalition of influential community leaders, legal experts, and former public officials have publicly come out against the Jamaican government’s proposed third-country nationals (TCNs) migration agreement with the United States, demanding full transparency and public consultation before the deal moves forward. The proposed arrangement would require Jamaica to accept groups of up to 25 non-Jamaican migrants that the U.S. seeks to deport from its territory over two-week periods, with an automatic pause on new arrivals once the total number of TCNs on the island exceeds 10. Third-country deportation frameworks, an increasingly controversial U.S. immigration policy, allow American authorities to transfer migrants the U.S. wants to remove to nations that are not the individual’s country of origin, even in cases where the person has never visited the host country, has no personal or familial ties there, and cannot speak the local language. Unlike prior public TCN agreements struck by the U.S. with other African and Caribbean nations, the Jamaican government has not yet confirmed whether the deal will include financial compensation to Kingston for accepting the deportees. Similar deals in recent years have included explicit multi-million-dollar payments: the Eswatini government agreed to accept up to 160 TCNs in exchange for $5.1 million earmarked for border and migration management infrastructure, while Rwanda secured a $7.5 million payment to accept up to 250 TCNs, and Equatorial Guinea also reportedly received a $7.5 million compensation package for its own agreement. In an effort to address gaps in transparency, Jamaican National Security Minister Dr. Horace Chang has attempted to ease public concern by noting that Jamaica will enforce two key conditions for all incoming TCNs: all deportees must be English-proficient, and none will be accepted if they have a prior criminal conviction. Despite these reassurances, opposition in the large Jamaican diaspora community in the U.S. remains fierce, with critics warning of unaddressed legal, security, and social risks that the government has failed to publicly acknowledge. Leading the charge is Winston Tucker, a prominent New York-based immigration attorney, who told reporters that preliminary indications suggest the deal will operate under the controversial U.S. “Shadow Docket” system, an expedited legal framework created to bypass lower court injunctions and send deportation cases directly to the U.S. Supreme Court for final review. As of the latest update on June 16, 2026, Tucker noted that the Supreme Court has not yet issued a ruling on the legality of third-country transfers, a policy that was not permitted under prior U.S. immigration precedent. He warned that Jamaica could face a severe legal and logistical bind if the Supreme Court ultimately strikes down the entire third-country deportation framework. “Hopefully the court will address the matter before its current session ends, but if the court rules the system unlawful, where does that leave Jamaica?” Tucker asked. He argued that Jamaican leadership should uphold longstanding migration principles, noting that U.S. communities have already rejected similar arrangements, and questioned why the migrants are not being directly deported to their countries of origin instead of being rerouted through a third nation. Wayne Golding, another well-known U.S.-based immigration law expert, echoed Tucker’s opposition, warning that the untransparent deal could quickly become an untenable burden on Jamaica’s already strained national security system. “It is unclear if the full implications of this agreement have been properly considered, but Jamaica could be stepping straight into a tangled, intractable social and legal mess if this plan moves forward,” Golding said. He joined the call for full public release of the bilateral memorandum of understanding (MOU) between Washington and Kingston, arguing that broad public consultation is required before any final decision is made. Dwight P Bailey, a New York-based former member of the Jamaica Constabulary Force, added that the MOU should never have been considered in the first place, raising urgent questions about basic logistics: where TCNs will be housed in Jamaica, what security protocols will be put in place to manage the new arrivals, and what will happen if the migrants’ home countries ultimately refuse to accept them for permanent resettlement. Additional opposition has come from faith and community leaders: Dr. Reverend Marilyn Grant, founder of Connecticut-based Women for Christ Outreach Ministries, called the Jamaican government’s decision to pursue the deal “absurd.” Dr. Rupert Francis, who leads the Diaspora Task Force on Crime Intervention and Prevention, also criticized the arrangement, saying it is clear that insufficient planning has gone into the proposal. Francis raised three critical unaddressed questions: whether Jamaica has the capacity to fully vet all incoming TCNs for security risks, where the arrivals will be housed during their stay on the island, and how Jamaican authorities will handle cases where TCNs file for asylum during their time in the country.

  • Learn about the changes that will impact citizens and businesses with the new Law 30-26

    Learn about the changes that will impact citizens and businesses with the new Law 30-26

    On Thursday, Dominican Republic President Luis Abinader formally enacted the Law of Measures for Economic Growth and Mitigation of the International Crisis, just after the country’s National Congress gave the legislation its final approval.

    Drafted in response to widespread global economic uncertainty that has sent ripples through markets and national economies worldwide, the new law centers on multiple core policy goals designed to shore up the Dominican Republic’s economic resilience and advance long-term national progress. Its overarching objectives include fostering inclusive sustainable development, boosting broad public well-being, and reinforcing the underlying conditions that support steady national economic and social expansion.

    A key pillar of the legislation focuses on upgrading the country’s public financial governance. It mandates more responsible stewardship of public resources and strengthens frameworks for tax compliance, all anchored in the guiding principles of equity, progressive taxation, and alignment with individual and corporate ability to pay. The legislation also explicitly notes that maintaining consistent fiscal and economic stability is a non-negotiable foundation for retaining public and investor confidence in state institutions, as well as for sustained private-sector job creation across the country.

    Against a backdrop of persistent international economic and financial volatility that has left many nations struggling to adapt to shifting conditions, the law frames its policy adjustments as a necessary proactive step. Proponents argue that strengthening fiscal discipline, shoring up the long-term sustainability of public finances, and boosting predictability in economic policy management will directly expand the Dominican state’s capacity to respond quickly and effectively to ongoing changes and emerging challenges in both the domestic and global economic landscape.

  • Just hours after its approval, Abinader enacted the tax reform law.

    Just hours after its approval, Abinader enacted the tax reform law.

    In a remarkably accelerated legislative process spanning just six days, the Dominican Republic’s ruling government has enacted a sweeping new tax reform billed as a buffer against economic turbulence sparked by the Iran-U.S. conflict. The policy push began June 11, when Minister of Finance and Economy Magín Díaz first unveiled the administration’s anti-crisis plan, framing targeted tax adjustments as a critical defense against global market shocks triggered by the Middle Eastern tensions. Just one week after its initial public presentation, the legislation—officially titled the Law of Measures for economic growth, tax simplification, and mitigation of the international crisis, recorded as Law 30-26—secured approval from both chambers of the National Congress and was signed into law by President Luis Abinader.

    The legislative timeline moved at an unprecedented pace: the bill was formally introduced to the Senate the Friday after Díaz’s announcement, with Senate President Ricardo de los Santos quickly convening a 11-member bicameral steering committee led by Senator Pedro Catrain to advance the draft. Just five days later, senators passed the bill under an urgent expedited procedure, adopting minor modifications to three key articles that adjusted tax rules for lottery retailers and removed import tariffs on fire trucks and ambulances before sending the text to the Chamber of Deputies. Deputies followed suit the very next day, approving the bill through back-to-back readings under emergency procedures, clearing it for presidential signature. President Abinader formalized the law immediately after completing a public appearance opening a new waterfront park on Santo Domingo’s Malecón.

    In an official press release announcing the law’s enactment, the National Palace emphasized the urgent need for the reform amid a global landscape defined by economic and financial instability. The legislation, the statement argued, is designed to reinforce fiscal discipline, shore up the long-term sustainability of public finances, and improve the predictability of national economic management—all to boost the Dominican state’s ability to respond quickly and effectively to shifting domestic and global economic challenges. The core fiscal goal of the new law is to generate an additional RD$50 billion in revenue for the national General State Budget by raising tax burdens across multiple sectors of the economy, which administration officials have positioned as a necessary step to absorb the economic fallout of the Iran-U.S. conflict.

    However, the extraordinary speed of the bill’s passage has drawn sharp criticism from opposition lawmakers, who have also raised alarms over the distribution of the new tax burden. Ahead of the final vote in the Chamber of Deputies, Rafael Castillo, spokesperson for the opposition People’s Force (FP) party, publicly lamented the prioritization of this tax bill over long-delayed structural reforms, noting, “How great it would have been if the Social Security Law, which is 14 years overdue, had been approved in a (similar) period or if we had dealt with the Labor Code using this same process.”

    Opposition legislators put forward more than 10 amendments to the draft bill during the Senate debate, but ruling party lawmakers from the Modern Revolutionary Party (PRM) ultimately rejected all changes, explaining that approving opposition amendments would send the bill back to the Senate and delay its enactment. Opposition representatives have highlighted specific provisions that they argue will raise costs for ordinary working Dominican families. FP Representative Carlos de Pérez argued that the new law imposes higher taxes on the annual Christmas bonus, commonly referred to as the 13th salary, and adds a 2-peso per gallon increase to domestic fuel prices on top of existing taxes and tariffs. “If we look at it closely, this reform will end up affecting the table and the pockets of every Dominican because it taxes fuel, which makes everything more expensive,” de Pérez explained.

    He added that the law also raises the tax on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)—the primary cooking fuel for most Dominican households—by 174 pesos per metric ton, meaning “turning on the stove at home to cook and eat will cost a little more.” De Pérez also questioned why the administration and ruling legislators rejected calls to exempt basic staple goods including rice, beans, eggs, and chicken from the existing Transfer Tax and Industrial Goods (ITBIS), a value-added tax, arguing, “that is the flag of the Dominicans” that should be protected from additional price pressures. The FP caucus also reiterated its longstanding demand, led by Senator Omar Fernández, for a full, rather than partial, adjustment of the Income Tax (ISR) bracket to match the country’s current annual inflation rate. While the reform does raise the lower income tax threshold from 34,000 to 39,000 pesos annually, de Pérez noted that this adjustment falls far short of matching inflation, adding: “If the cause the Government announced was the war in the Middle East and that disappeared, the most decent thing would have been for the project to have disappeared as well.”

    Not all opposition figures rejected the entire reform, however. Some members of the center-left Dominican Liberation Party (PLD) acknowledged that the legislation includes several positive, targeted provisions that will benefit vulnerable groups and small businesses. Representative Ydenia Doñé highlighted the full elimination of advance tax payments for micro-enterprises, a 3% reduction in inheritance tax for transfers between parents and children, and a new special tax deduction for educational expenses for families caring for members with disabilities as welcome changes included in the new law.

  • More taxes What the new ISC indexation means for consumers and businesses

    More taxes What the new ISC indexation means for consumers and businesses

    The General Directorate of Internal Taxes (DGII) has formally announced a scheduled update to the specific Selective Consumption Tax (ISC) rates levied on alcoholic beverages, beer, cigarettes and a range of other regulated products, with the new tax framework set to enter into force on July 1, 2026, and remain active through September 30 of that year.

    Outlined in official Resolution No. DDG-ARI-2026-00004, the revised ISC for a broad category of alcoholic products including malt beer, still and sparkling wines, aromatized wine-based drinks like vermouth, fermented fruit ciders, and all distilled spirits has been set at 764.29 Dominican pesos (RD$) per standard tariff unit. This adjustment aligns strictly with the tax adjustment guidelines laid out in Article 375 of the Dominican Tax Code, confirming the change adheres to existing legal frameworks.

    For tobacco products, the tax authority has set differentiated specific rates based on pack size. A standard 20-unit pack of cigarettes, whether produced from dark (black) or light (blond) tobacco, will carry an ISC of RD$64.65, while smaller 10-unit packs will be taxed at half that rate, RD$32.33. The uniform rate across both tobacco varieties eliminates any classification-based discrepancies in tax liability for manufacturers and importers.

    In a statement accompanying the resolution, DGII officials elaborated on the dual objectives behind the scheduled tax update. First, the adjustment is designed to maintain consistent tax pressure on product categories long classified as harmful to public health, a policy lever that discourages excessive consumption of alcohol and tobacco. Second, the updated rates will boost cumulative state tax revenue, supporting broader government fiscal efforts to maintain long-term fiscal sustainability for the country.

  • OPINION: Is Extending and Expanding the Windfall Tax the Correct Answer?

    OPINION: Is Extending and Expanding the Windfall Tax the Correct Answer?

    A fresh debate over the future of Antigua and Barbuda’s temporary windfall tax has erupted following a June 2026 opinion piece calling for the policy’s extension and expansion to advance national education goals. Responding to Professor C. Justin Robinson’s argument that the proposal deserves full national deliberation, a veteran policy analyst with over 35 years of decision-making experience has pushed back against the rushed framing of the conversation, while calling for greater transparency and dispassionate cost-benefit analysis before any final policy vote.

    The analyst emphasizes that effective problem-solving does not prioritize being seen as correct, but rather making the right, contextually informed decision. A robust decision-making process requires first defining clear, measurable outcomes, diagnosing why current systems are falling short, evaluating emerging trends and alternative solutions, and only then deliberating on a path forward. In the analyst’s view, the current conversation around the windfall tax has inverted this process: the solution—extending and expanding the levy—has been presented to the public before any clear consensus on the underlying problem has been established.

    While the analyst acknowledges alignment with some of the equity-focused education outcomes Professor Robinson aims to achieve, they reject the windfall tax as the appropriate funding mechanism. They also note a structural conflict of interest: Professor Robinson is affiliated with the University of the West Indies (UWI), the primary beneficiary of the tax revenue, so full objectivity on the policy cannot reasonably be expected.

    For context, the windfall tax was first introduced in 2019 as a three-year temporary measure to fund the construction of UWI’s Five Islands Campus. Levied at a 10% rate on net profits, it applies exclusively to private businesses operating in banking, telecommunications, insurance, and petroleum distribution—on top of the existing 25% corporate tax already paid by these firms. Despite its original temporary mandate, the government has repeatedly extended the tax without public justification, a move the analyst describes as convenient and dishonest.

    Critically, the analyst argues that the sacred cow of public education should not shield the proposal from rigorous scrutiny. Before committing scarce public resources to expanded education funding, policymakers must first answer a fundamental question: what measurable return on public investment do Antiguans and Barbudans expect from expanded education spending? Is the goal to produce more tourism-sector workers, legal professionals, or tech and AI specialists? Without clear outcome metrics, strategic budget allocation is impossible.

    Limiting their critique to the funding components of the proposal, the analyst has laid out nine core questions that demand public answers from the government before any vote to extend and expand the tax. These include: what is the annual revenue yield of the current tax, and how is that money currently spent; how much additional revenue does the new education plan require; what happened to revenue from the existing Education Levy; with a total national budget exceeding EC$2 billion, can funds be reallocated from existing priorities instead of raising new taxes; how is the government addressing widespread public sector waste to free up additional revenue for education; how long can the increased tax burden be sustained before it pushes struggling private firms out of business, particularly when they face unfair competition from tax-exempt state-owned enterprises and ongoing global economic shocks; what is the plan to make new education initiatives self-sustaining after the windfall tax is eventually withdrawn; when will state-owned enterprises operating in the taxed sectors start contributing their fair share to the fund, and is it fair to require private firms to compete against state competitors that do not pay the levy; and finally, how will expanded funding guarantee improved education quality, rather than just more spending with no accountability for outcomes.

    The analyst rejects Professor Robinson’s framing that policymakers should only focus on what new programs the tax can fund, ignoring the concept of opportunity cost and the growing financial strain already faced by private sector businesses. No discussion has yet addressed how expanding the tax net will push up business costs, which will inevitably be passed on to consumers, already strained by a per-capita annual public spending burden of $20,000. The analyst also questions whether the country can afford to expand public spending programs without risking sovereign fiscal instability.

    For the proposal to qualify as a genuine national consideration, the government must first release all relevant data to the public to allow for informed public feedback. Echoing the core principle of democratic governance, the analyst concludes: “No taxation without representation!”