Four up-and-coming karate athletes from Barbados’ national squad have fallen just short of securing automatic berths to the 2024 Central American and Caribbean (CAC) Games, landing reserve positions instead after a strong showing at the regional qualification tournament hosted in the Dominican Republic last month. Joseph Tseu, Kodie King, Shannan Skeete and Ric-Anne Brathwaite left everything on the competition mat between April 16 and 18 at the CAC Qualifiers, ultimately walking away with reserve slots that could see them compete at the main Games, set to run from July 24 to August 8 in the Dominican Republic. Tseu holds the first reserve spot for men’s kata, while King (84kg kumite), Skeete (61kg kumite) and Brathwaite (68kg kumite) are listed as second reserves across their respective sparring divisions. Should any qualified athlete withdraw before the tournament kicks off, the Barbadian reserves will step in to fill the vacant position. Despite missing out on automatic qualification, the team’s coaching staff framed the outing as a promising, respectable showing for the small island nation’s karate program. Assistant coach Corey Greaves, who traveled to the qualification event alongside head coach Cameron King, shared the team’s takeaways in an interview with Barbados TODAY. “We didn’t hit our ultimate goal of locking in qualifying spots, but landing first and second reserves across multiple disciplines means we held our own out here,” Greaves said. “Now we just wait and hope for an opening that lets one of our athletes step into the main draw.” Greaves emphasized that every athlete on the trip turned in a better performance than at past competitions, with the revised qualifying structure giving competitors more opportunities to compete and gain critical experience. He broke down the structure of the qualification tournament, noting that the host Dominican Republic automatically claimed one of the eight total spots available across each division, leaving seven spots open for all other competing nations. Athletes who did not secure one of the four immediate automatic berths advanced to a round-robin playoff to compete for the final three qualification positions. With the possibility of last-minute withdrawals still on the table ahead of the summer Games, Greaves confirmed that the four reserves will maintain a rigorous training schedule back home in Barbados to stay ready if called upon. A key part of that preparation for the kumite athletes, he added, is maintaining their required weight classes to meet tournament regulations. While Greaves expressed optimism about the long-term future of competitive karate in Barbados, he also shared measured concerns about the pace of the sport’s growth on the island compared to regional powerhouses. “Karate is growing steadily, and we’re seeing more athletes from other martial arts backgrounds transition into competitive sports karate now that the World Karate Federation has opened a formal pathway for cross-discipline participation,” he explained. “More and more young athletes are drawn to this side of the sport because it offers a clear path to compete at the Olympics and Commonwealth Games, something traditional karate does not provide. That said, the sport is not growing as quickly as I would like to see it. Countries like Mexico and other Latin American nations bring 20 or more athletes to major regional events, while Barbados rarely travels with more than 10 competitors. When there are 14 possible spots across different divisions and categories, we can only compete for 10 of them because we simply don’t have the depth of athlete numbers to match our regional rivals.” Greaves added that small athlete pools are a widespread challenge across the Caribbean, but noted that English-speaking Caribbean nations, including Barbados, are steadily expanding their ranks of competitive sports karate athletes, setting the foundation for stronger showings at future events.
作者: admin
-

CIBC Caribbean boosts prize money as it searches for Unsung Heroes
CIBC Caribbean is launching its second annual search for quiet, unrecognized community changemakers across its 10-nation regional footprint, announcing a major increase in prize rewards for this year’s top honorees.
First revived in 2025 after a decade-long pause, the bank’s flagship community outreach initiative, the CIBC Caribbean Unsung Heroes programme, drew 39 nominations across a wide range of community service sectors in its debut relaunch year. Mark St Hill, Chief Executive Officer of CIBC Caribbean and Chair of the CIBC Caribbean ComTrust Foundation — the bank’s charitable arm that sponsors the programme — shared that the 2025 relaunch exceeded all expectations, and organizers are preparing for an even more impactful campaign in 2026 focused on lifting up people who work tirelessly without fanfare to improve local communities.
St Hill highlighted the breadth of impact recognized in the programme’s first relaunch year: 2025 Regional Unsung Hero Lucinda Mini Smith from the British Virgin Islands, first runner-up Venetta Zakers from St Kitts and Nevis, and second runner-up Joshuanette Francis from Antigua and Barbuda were joined by dozens of national honorees working across critical causes. These included environmental conservation, support for at-risk youth and marginalized women, food access for unhoused populations, and care for elderly and vulnerable community members.
St Hill emphasized that the contributions of these quiet advocates cannot be quantified, but the bank sought to deliver meaningful, tangible recognition for their work, leading to the decision to boost prize purses for 2026 regional winners. The 2026 Regional Unsung Hero will take home $10,000 USD — double the top prize awarded in 2025. First runner-up will receive $7,000 USD, up from $3,000 USD last year, while second runner-up will get $5,000 USD, a major jump from 2025’s $1,500 USD award. A $1,000 USD bonus prize will also go to the person who nominates the 2026 Regional Unsung Hero.
The 2026 campaign is open to any person aged 10 or older who has driven positive change in their community but has not received widespread public recognition or major formal awards. Nominations can be submitted in two categories: sustained outstanding community service, and an extraordinary act of heroism, bravery, or exceptional kindness completed within the 12 months leading up to the 2026 campaign launch.
The nomination window opens in April 2026 and closes at the end of July 2026. Local national winners will be selected and announced in August, with these national honorees advancing to the regional awards competition. Regional top winners will be named by the end of August 2026. In September, the three top regional honorees and each of their guests will travel to Barbados for a dedicated awards ceremony to present their prizes. Full details on the programme and the nomination process are available on CIBC Caribbean’s official website.
-

Money in Seconds: Central Bank of Belize to Launch BIPS
In a major announcement made public on April 21, 2026, the Central Bank of Belize has officially revealed plans to roll out the country’s first modern instant payments infrastructure, the Belize Instant Payments System (BIPS), with a full launch targeted for the first quarter of 2028.
Designed to address longstanding pain points in the nation’s existing financial transfer framework, BIPS is engineered to transform how individuals and businesses move money across the country. Unlike current processing systems that can leave domestic transfers pending for hours or even multiple business days, the new platform will enable real-time sending and receiving of funds, while also reducing transaction costs and strengthening security protocols for all users.
Central Bank Governor Kareem Michael confirmed that the regulatory institution has already executed a formal implementation contract with U.S.-based financial technology firm Montran Corporation to build and deploy the new system. According to Governor Michael, BIPS is far more than a simple payment upgrade: it stands as a cornerstone of the central bank’s national strategy to reinforce the overall resilience of Belize’s financial system, boost operational efficiency across the banking sector, and expand meaningful financial inclusion for underserved communities across the country.
The initiative builds on a decade of incremental payments modernization work in Belize. It traces its roots back to the 2016 launch of the Automated Payment and Securities Settlement System (APSSS), the nation’s first major shift toward electronic transfers and automated clearing, which laid the technical groundwork for the faster, more seamless system being introduced today.
To ensure the platform delivers on its promised benefits, the Central Bank is now urging all domestic commercial banks to prioritize technical upgrades to their internal infrastructure to enable full interoperability with BIPS. Governor Michael emphasized that cross-institution compatibility will be the single most critical factor in the system’s long-term success, noting that BIPS will eventually become a core component of Belize’s national financial backbone. Moving forward, the central bank will work closely with local financial institutions to coordinate the upgrade timeline ahead of the 2028 go-live date.
-

Public Service Transfers Suspended for 2026; PSU Backs Government Decision
In a policy shift announced in late April 2026, the Government of Belize has enacted a full suspension of all public service transfers that involve a change of jurisdiction for the entire calendar year, extending the current postings of all affected public officers by 12 months.
The official order is formalized in Circular Memorandum No. 26 of 2026, dated April 20 and issued by Rolando Zetina, Chief Executive Officer of the Ministry of the Public Service and Disaster Risk Management. Per the document, while Regulation 101(1) of the 2014 Belize Constitution (Public Service) Regulations requires standard tours of duty to run between two and three years, the ministry has determined that the 2026 cycle of postings requires an extra year at current duty stations, citing the “exigencies of the service” as the core justification for the change. Under the new policy, no applications for cross-jurisdiction transfers will be reviewed or approved this year, and department chief executives have been instructed to submit formal requests for the one-year extensions where operationally required.
In an official statement responding to the announcement, the Public Service Union (PSU), the country’s leading body representing public sector employees, confirmed it fully endorses the government’s decision, framing the suspension as both “timely and necessary”.
The union outlined longstanding concerns that have driven its support for the policy: in recent years, many transfers have been carried out as punitive measures rather than for operational efficiency, placing unnecessary financial strain on national public finances. According to PSU estimates, annual costs associated with public service transfers—including transfer grants, rental subsidies, commuting allowances, and hardship stipends—add up to millions of Belize dollars each year, draining resources that could be allocated to core public services.
Beyond budget concerns, the union also referenced Regulation 96 of the Public Service Regulations, which mandates that all transfers must be conducted strictly to advance public service interests, and cannot be used as a replacement for formal disciplinary procedures. The PSU stated that it has documented multiple cases in which transfers were allegedly deployed to victimize, intimidate, or marginalize public officers who have fallen out of favor with administrative leadership.
As the policy moves forward, the PSU has laid out two key demands to ensure equitable implementation. First, the organization stressed that all eligible public officers must continue to receive all applicable allowances without interruption during their extended tours of duty, and has called on finance officials across all government ministries to put in place the necessary administrative and budgetary provisions to avoid any stoppages in pay and benefits. Second, the union is calling on the Ministry of the Public Service and Disaster Risk Management to maintain close oversight of how the suspension is implemented across departments, and to proactively put safeguards in place to prevent the continued misuse of transfers as a tool for retaliation against public servants once the moratorium is lifted.
-

CCJ questions AG Nandlall about whether making commentary on Mohameds was “proper”
On Tuesday, April 21, 2026, the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) opened a tense session focused on more than just the legal merits of an extradition appeal: judges zeroed in on controversial public statements made by Guyana’s top legal official, Attorney General Anil Nandlall, regarding two US-sanctioned and wanted Guyanese businessmen, Nazar Mohamed and Azruddin Mohamed.
The case currently before the regional court stems from the Mohameds’ appeal of an Arrest Warrant Authorization (ATP) issued last October by Guyana’s Home Affairs Minister Oneidge Walrond. The ATP authorized a local magistrate to move forward with an arrest warrant to open extradition committal proceedings for the pair, who have been sanctioned by the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control over allegations of financial misconduct. All lower court proceedings have been put on hold pending the CCJ’s final ruling, which has not yet been scheduled.
During Tuesday’s hearing, the issue of Nandlall’s public commentary took center stage after the Mohameds’ legal team argued that the attorney general’s repeated public statements created a taint of bias that undermines the fairness of the entire extradition process.
CCJ President Winston Anderson acknowledged that all legal professionals, including government lawyers, hold a protected right to free speech. Still, he emphasized that out-of-court statements that risk eroding public trust in judicial processes or compromising the fairness of ongoing proceedings have no place in a functional democracy. “Statements which are made outside of these proceedings and which could have the effect of undermining the fairness of the proceedings, or which could undermine public confidence in the administration of justice, should be avoided,” Anderson stated, adding that he expected legal representatives to adhere to professional guidelines and that the court would prefer not to address the issue again.
Anderson went on to press Nandlall, noting that while serious allegations against the Mohameds are already on the public record, there was no clear reason for the government’s chief legal advisor to issue public pronouncements on the ongoing case. The court highlighted that the “elephant in the room” is the Mohameds’ core claim: that Nandlall’s public comments revealed a predetermined bias against them in any extradition request, a claim that Minister Walrond – who received legal advice from Nandlall before issuing the ATP – did not refute from her position in the courtroom.
Justice Chile Eboe-Osuji expanded on the court’s concerns, clarifying that the issue is not whether the Attorney General has the authority to make formal decisions in the case, but whether his public comments – which included criminal accusations against the applicants, ongoing public commentary on the extradition process, and implied criticism of Principal Magistrate Judy Latchman who is assigned to the committal proceedings – have irreparably biased the process. Eboe-Osuji posed a sharp question to Nandlall: “Is there something to be said that it is part of the job of the AG to bring the population back to say, look, respect the process, let the process take its course rather than making comments that might add to that negative public view on the matter?”
Judge Arif Bulkan also pushed back on Nandlall’s attempts to frame the controversy as a product of political rivalry, pointing out that the attorney general had failed to directly address the court’s core question about his comments on the extradition case and its expected outcome. Nandlall pushed back against the judges’ questioning, denying he had ever commented on the projected outcome of the proceedings. He argued his public remarks focused instead on public concerns over the length of the ongoing committal process and referenced already public information: the US sanctions against the Mohameds that had been widely reported by international outlets including Reuters.
Nandlall further defended his comments by noting many of the remarks were made during the 2025 Guyanese general and regional election campaign, a period when public debate over political and policy issues is heightened. “This is his rap sheet; this is what we have to speak about,” he told the court, adding that he had not made any improper statements. He argued that any perceived missteps stem from incorrect quotation, and that his comments were framed appropriately with respect for the judicial system, and any use of his remarks against him is politically motivated. “The comments that were made were in their proper context. They may have been disputed and used for political purposes, but they were not improper statements,” he said.
The Mohameds’ legal team has argued that Minister Walrond’s decision to authorize the arrest warrant is fatally biased because she acted on advice from Nandlall, who has repeatedly publicly condemned the pair and commented on their multiple ongoing court cases at every level of the Guyanese judicial system, from the magistrates’ court to the Court of Appeal. They also point out that Walrond herself publicly spoke out against the Mohameds during the 2025 election campaign.
In closing the court’s questioning on the issue, President Anderson noted that the panel of judges was actively questioning whether Nandlall’s comments aligned with the standards of best practice needed to strengthen democratic governance and the rule of law in Guyana. Nandlall reiterated that his role was limited to providing legal advice to the Home Affairs Minister, who retained full authority to make the final decision on the ATP.





