标签: Suriname

苏里南

  • Adhin vraagt Wijnerman opheldering na uitspraken EBS-directeur; felle kritiek Sapoen

    Adhin vraagt Wijnerman opheldering na uitspraken EBS-directeur; felle kritiek Sapoen

    A political firestorm has erupted in Suriname’s parliament following incendiary comments from the chief executive of state-owned energy utility Energie Bedrijven Suriname (EBS), prompting top legislative leaders to demand official clarity on outstanding government payments to the utility.

    The controversy began when ruling National Democratic Party (NDP) Member of Parliament Raymond Sapoen publicly voiced his deep anger over recent remarks made by EBS CEO Leo Brunswijk directed at the country’s national legislature, De Nationale Assemblee (DNA). Sapoen told fellow lawmakers he was “extremely disturbed” by the tone and content of Brunswijk’s comments, which he claimed amounted to an order for parliament to “keep its big mouth shut” and first pay its outstanding electricity bills.

    The confrontation unfolded amid ongoing parliamentary debates over Suriname’s national energy supply security. Sapoen pushed back against the CEO’s rhetoric, arguing that even the head of a state-owned enterprise is not beyond accountability. As a publicly owned company fulfilling a critical public service, Sapoen noted, EBS’s top leadership owes respect to the country’s elected legislative body, and Brunswijk’s confrontational language was entirely inappropriate.

    Importantly, Sapoen clarified that he was not weighing in on whether parliament currently carries an outstanding balance with EBS. For him, the core issue is the disrespectful manner in which Brunswijk addressed the nation’s legislature, which he called a serious affront to the institution of parliament. He called on both DNA’s presiding officer and the government, as EBS’s majority shareholder, to address the situation formally.

    Within days of Sapoen’s complaint, DNA President Ashwin Adhin confirmed he had already taken formal action, sending a written request to Finance and Planning Minister Adelien Wijnerman seeking full transparency on EBS billing records for government entities, including details on where outstanding invoices are being processed and tracked. Adhin said he expects a timely response from the minister, and if a reply does not arrive within the expected window, parliament will issue a formal reminder to push for a response.

    The controversy soon led to confirmation of long-standing unpaid government utility debts in a subsequent parliamentary meeting. Vice President Gregory Rusland addressed the issue directly, confirming that the Surinamese government holds large accumulated payment arrears not only at EBS, but also at the national water utility Surinaamsche Waterleiding Maatschappij (SWM). According to Rusland, some of these outstanding debts date all the way back to 2020.

    Rusland added that the cabinet of ministers has already discussed the backlog of unpaid utility bills, and the administration is currently working out structured payment arrangements to clear the outstanding arrears at both state-owned utility providers. “When a company provides services, you have to pay for them,” Rusland affirmed, acknowledging the validity of the core claim behind the CEO’s controversial comments.

  • Stralende ochtend met kans op regen in de middag

    Stralende ochtend met kans op regen in de middag

    The Meteorological Service of Suriname has released its daily weather forecast for September 8, outlining a day of shifting conditions that starts with warm, sunny weather and ends with scattered severe thunderstorm activity across much of the country.

    The day will open with largely dry conditions and abundant sunshine across most regions, though patchy light fog will reduce visibility in some low-lying areas through the early morning. Temperatures will climb rapidly as the morning progresses, reaching between 32°C and 35°C by midday. In direct sunlight, the heat index will push perceived temperatures even higher, hitting roughly 37°C. With the UV index reaching extremely high levels for the day, officials are urging anyone planning to spend extended periods outdoors to apply high-factor sunscreen and take regular breaks in shaded areas to avoid sun damage or heat-related illness.

    Winds will be calm through the early part of the day, with a light easterly breeze registering at force 3 or lower on the Beaufort scale.

    Starting in the afternoon, the weather pattern will gradually shift. Intense daytime heating of the land surface will create atmospheric instability, creating conditions ripe for localized rain showers and thunderstorms to develop across every region of the country. The national meteorological service warns that some of these storm cells could bring severe conditions, including heavy downpours, frequent lightning, and gusty winds.

    Coastal districts including the capital Paramaribo are expected to stay drier than inland areas through the afternoon, but residents there still face a real chance of seeing a passing storm. Inland regions such as Stoelmanseiland and Kabalebo are likely to see the most intense precipitation, while the Langa tabbetje area will see mostly cloudy conditions with a moderate chance of scattered showers.

    Overnight after the storms pass, temperatures will cool to between 22°C and 25°C. Thunderstorm activity will gradually move out of the region, but patchy fog is expected to develop in some locations through the overnight hours.

  • Olieprijs naar zeswekelijkse piek na escalatie VS-Iran in Straat van Hormuz

    Olieprijs naar zeswekelijkse piek na escalatie VS-Iran in Straat van Hormuz

    Global crude oil prices climbed to a nearly six-week peak on Monday, driven by a sharp escalation of military tensions between the United States and Iran in the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, amplifying already persistent concerns over global energy supply shortages. As of Monday’s trading, Brent crude, the global benchmark for oil pricing, hovered around $97 per barrel. This marks a 9% jump over the past five trading days and a 19% increase over the last month, after briefly touching an intraday high of $97.93 — the highest level recorded since the end of July. U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude also rose to settle at $92.27 per barrel.

    The sudden upward swing in oil prices follows a series of recent missile exchanges in and around the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint that carries roughly one-fifth of the world’s total oil trade every day. The U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) announced Saturday that it had attacked three Iranian oil tankers after U.S. naval vessels came under ballistic missile fire. Two of the targeted tankers were permanently disabled, while the third was completely destroyed. Iran issued a conflicting account of the incident, claiming it had launched strikes on three tankers and three U.S. naval vessels, and warned of far harsher retaliatory measures in response to American aggression.

    This round of clashes marks the latest escalation in a long-running conflict that began in February when U.S. and Israeli forces launched strikes on Iranian targets. A June ceasefire failed to hold, and hostilities have reignited and intensified steadily since late August. “This latest escalation is a direct reflection of the ongoing cross-fire and sustained conflict, and global oil supply shortages continue to persist with little end in sight,” explained Rachel Ziemba, adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS).

    Tensions worsened further on Monday when Saudi Aramco’s refinery in Jizan was struck for the second time in just one month. Industry insiders note that the attack could delay the facility’s planned return to full production capacity. Shipping data compiled by analytics firm Kpler shows that traffic through the strait has dropped dramatically, with only an average of 10 cargo vessels transiting the strategic waterway each day — the lowest daily volume recorded since May.

    American consumers are already bearing the immediate brunt of higher crude prices at fuel pumps. Data from the American Automobile Association (AAA) shows the average national price of a gallon of gasoline has jumped 7 cents in a single week to $4.15. That is 39% higher than the $2.98 per gallon average recorded before the conflict began on February 28. Even more alarming are record-breaking diesel prices, which hit $5.85 per gallon last week and climbed above $5.90 on Monday. “U.S. diesel prices have never been this high, and we are now just waiting for these higher costs to trickle down to every single product consumers purchase,” Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at fuel pricing platform GasBuddy, wrote on social platform X. Diesel is the primary fuel for freight trucking, agricultural operations and construction, meaning price increases are eventually passed through to nearly all consumer goods. Calculations from Brown University’s Watson School of International and Public Affairs find that the average U.S. household has spent an extra $764.59 on fuel since the conflict began, $418.82 above typical seasonal spending.

    The disruption to Hormuz oil shipments has widespread global impact: 10 major economies rely heavily on Middle Eastern oil exports that pass through the strait, with Eritrea and Madagascar sourcing nearly 90% of their total oil supply from the region. Three of the world’s largest economies — Japan, China, and South Korea — source more than half of their oil from Middle Eastern exporters.

    In the United States, skyrocketing fuel prices have become a defining issue ahead of the country’s midterm elections, scheduled for November 3 to 5. Polling shows widespread voter dissatisfaction with President Donald Trump’s handling of the economy. A recent Financial Times poll found only 17% of American voters approve of Trump’s economic policies. A separate Economist/YouGov survey found 39% of voters believe the Democratic Party offers better economic policy, compared to just 32% who favor Republican leadership. Recent economic data offers a mixed picture: the U.S. economy added 162,000 new jobs in August, and the unemployment rate held steady at 4.1%, indicating ongoing modest growth. But soaring fuel costs and broader inflation have eroded consumer purchasing power significantly, creating widespread financial strain for households.

    For China, which is heavily dependent on oil imports passing through the Strait of Hormuz, analysts say the country has taken steps to buffer against supply disruptions. China maintains a large strategic petroleum reserve, has reduced domestic oil consumption growth in recent years, and benefits from close energy ties with Russia, which can meet nearly half of China’s daily oil demand. The country has also accelerated its transition to electric vehicles, with EVs now accounting for more than half of all new car sales in China, according to John Gong, an economics professor at the University of International Business and Economics. Even so, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warns that Iran only has roughly 30 million barrels of crude oil remaining available for export to China, and U.S. blockades of Iranian ports have already drained that stockpile rapidly. Once the remaining reserve is exhausted, China will lose access to cheap Iranian crude, a shift that could put even more upward pressure on global oil markets.

  • DNA unaniem achter Surinamerschap voor diasporasporters

    DNA unaniem achter Surinamerschap voor diasporasporters

    After weeks of polarized, wide-ranging debate, Suriname’s National Assembly (DNA) passed a landmark amendment to the country’s Surinamese Nationality and Residency Act in the early hours of Tuesday, with all 29 present lawmakers casting votes in favor of the revised bill around 1:40 a.m. local time. What began as a deeply divided negotiation between ruling coalition and opposition parties ultimately yielded a cross-party compromise after multiple rounds of closed and open consultations, narrowing the scope of the legislation’s special naturalization pathway to only elite athletes from the global Surinamese diaspora who can represent the country at the international level.

    Initiator Ebu Jones expressed relief after the final vote, noting that the prolonged legislative process had concluded successfully. Jones emphasized that the new law removes longstanding barriers to recruiting talented Surinamese athletes who have built their sporting careers outside the country, allowing Suriname to leverage diaspora talent to strengthen its international competitive standing. Multiple lawmakers from across the political aisle highlighted during debate that sport has a unique ability to unite communities across ideological and political divides, a theme that anchored the final compromise negotiations.

    The final approved version of the bill represents a significant revision from the original legislative proposal. Initially, drafters had extended the special naturalization pathway to include individuals with exceptional scientific achievements as well, but after factional pushback and cross-party negotiations, leaders agreed to limit the policy to athletes in this first phase. The explanatory memorandum accompanying the bill justifies this narrowing by noting that international sports governing bodies universally require competitors to hold the nationality of the nation they represent, creating an urgent, specific need for this streamlined pathway that does not exist in the same form for scientific professionals.

    Under the new framework, eligibility is restricted to individuals who qualify under the PSA (Person of Surinamese Origin) designation and have already demonstrated, or show clear potential to demonstrate, exceptional sporting ability. Athletes must be positioned to add meaningful value to Suriname’s international competitive delegations, and the policy applies across all sports whose national governing bodies are affiliated with the Surinamese Olympic Committee, not just football.

    To qualify, athletes must meet either the selection standards set by their national team head coach, or the formal eligibility criteria for continental championships, confederation events, World Cups, or the Olympic Games. National governing bodies may also formally submit a motivated case confirming that an athlete would provide unique value to Suriname during qualification matches or final tournament runs. The Surinamese Football Association, which has already been working to recruit top diaspora talent, will play a central role in implementing the law — a timely change, as the national men’s football team is set to face Honduras in a Concacaf Nations League match as early as September 25.

    A key procedural feature of the new law grants the Surinamese president authority to formally grant nationality to eligible athletes, following a nomination from the minister of sports and in consultation with the minister responsible for nationality affairs. Both the relevant national sports federation and the prosecutor general must be consulted before a decision is made. Most notably, the eligible athlete themselves is not required to submit an application, accept the nationality explicitly, sign any formal documentation, or swear an oath or declaration of citizenship. Surinamese nationality is granted automatically by law on the date of the president’s formal decision.

    Lawmakers also reached a clear agreement on the National Assembly’s oversight role: the legislature will not vote on individual grants of nationality, but must receive an official copy of the president’s decision and its underlying justifications within 30 days of issuance, allowing parliament to question the government on individual cases if needed.

    Co-initiators Steven Reyme and Edgar Sampie both expressed enthusiasm for the final outcome, noting that national interest ultimately prevailed over partisan divides. Reyme specifically highlighted the cooperation of the VHP faction in reaching the compromise. Vice President Gregory Rusland echoed that sentiment after the vote, noting that the National Assembly had demonstrated that national solidarity can overcome political divisions, and expressed satisfaction with the final legislation.

    NDP faction leader Rabin Parmessar framed the outcome as a victory for Surinamese democracy in his post-vote remarks, noting that while initial debates were deeply polarized, multiple rounds of negotiation allowed disparate positions to be aligned into a policy that serves the best interests of Suriname’s athletes. VHP faction leader Asiskumar Gajadien similarly emphasized the unifying power of sport, noting that the legislative process had reaffirmed that “sport binds a nation.” Gajadien also highlighted the deep connection between Suriname and its global diaspora, noting that the policy opens new doors for diaspora community members to contribute to the country’s ongoing development. In closing remarks, every faction in the National Assembly reiterated their shared commitment to national interest and celebration of the cross-party consensus reached on the bill.

  • Column: Niet de (medische) student, maar het systeem schiet tekort

    Column: Niet de (medische) student, maar het systeem schiet tekort

    For years, public debate around the medical degree program at Suriname’s Anton de Kom University has centered on one restrictive number: 30. Only 30 aspiring physicians are granted admission each academic year, despite overwhelming demand from qualified applicants. New data from a recent independent study of the program reveals just how stark this gap is: in the 2025-2026 intake cycle alone, 117 candidates applied, and just 30 secured a spot. Between the 2020-2021 and 2025-2026 cycles, the university received 873 total applications but offered admission to only 301, meaning on average just one out of every three applicants can begin their medical training at the domestic institution.

    This chronic under-admission has sparked widespread frustration among young Surinamese. For applicants whose families can afford the high cost of studying abroad, the only option is to pursue their degree outside of Suriname, with many heading to Cuba, Serbia, the Netherlands and other nations to train. But the recent study makes clear that the crisis facing Suriname’s medical education sector extends far beyond limited intake slots—it is rooted in deep, unaddressed systemic failures that require structural reform.

    A key conceptual clarification at the heart of the study is the critical distinction between two core policy metrics that are rarely aligned in current practice: Numerus Fixus and Numerus Clausus. Numerus Fixus refers to the total number of new physicians that Suriname’s healthcare system actually needs each year to meet public demand. Numerus Clausus, by contrast, sets the maximum number of students the university can reasonably train given its current resources: available teaching staff, classroom space, laboratory facilities, practical training opportunities and clinical placement slots. The study’s core recommendation, shared in a formal presentation to Suriname’s president, is that these two figures must be reviewed and aligned on an annual basis—a step that current governance structures have consistently failed to implement.

    Intake caps at the program have shifted dramatically in recent years. Through the 2023-2024 academic cycle, the university admitted roughly 60 students annually, before cutting the number nearly in half to the current 30-student cap. Counterintuitively, the study found that training a cohort of 30 students actually results in higher per-graduate costs than training a regulated cohort of 60. For each graduating general practitioner, the program’s mid-range cost estimate sits at roughly 7.7 million Surinamese dollars per graduate with a 30-student intake. That cost drops to just 3.9 million Surinamese dollars per graduate when intake is set to 60. This disparity stems from the large share of fixed operating costs that remain consistent regardless of cohort size, meaning underutilized capacity drives up per-student expenses unnecessarily.

    However, the study emphasizes that this data does not mean the university can immediately raise intake back to 60 students. A second major bottleneck stands in the way: a crippling shortage of available clerkship placement slots, which form a non-negotiable part of clinical medical training. All medical students must complete hands-on practical training in hospitals and other healthcare facilities under the direct supervision of practicing physicians. Currently, the country only has between 30 and 40 active clerkship slots available, but 79 clinical clerks are already training, with another 24 candidates waiting for an opening. A large additional cohort of students is approaching the clinical phase of their degree, creating a growing backlog that will only worsen without intervention. The presentation to the president explicitly warns that expanding intake without first expanding clerkship capacity will only increase waiting times for students and put the overall quality of medical training at serious risk.

    This creates a paradoxical, broken system for medical training in Suriname. At the front end, thousands of talented young applicants are locked out of the program entirely due to limited training capacity. At the back end, admitted students face years of costly delays simply because there are not enough practical placement slots to let them progress. Beyond capacity issues, the study also highlights deep equity gaps that prevent many groups of young Surinamese from accessing the medical program in the first place.

    Crucially, the study explicitly rejects calls for ethnic quotas or lowered academic standards as a solution to these inequities. Instead, it traces gaps in access back to systemic barriers that emerge long before students apply to university. Disparities in access stem from uneven quality of secondary education, limited access to required pre-medical course tracks, gaps in access to science coursework, language barriers, inadequate academic guidance, unequal financial resources, and barriers related to transportation and housing that disproportionately impact students outside urban centers. Instead of lowering standards or implementing quotas, researchers recommend early intervention: identifying where talented students are being blocked from the pathway to medical school starting in secondary education, and removing those barriers proactively.

    This emphasis on early intervention is well-founded, the study notes: government cannot wait to address access gaps until a student submits their university application. Targeted guidance and preparation must begin in secondary school, so all students understand what coursework is required to qualify for medical training, and secondary schools across all districts are able to offer the rigorous science education that is a prerequisite for admission. Without targeted policy intervention, entire groups of students are effectively excluded from the program not for lack of talent, but for lack of opportunity along the pathway.

    The study also calls for stronger tracking and support for students after they are admitted to the program. Institutions need to systematically identify which students are facing delays, which are dropping out, which face unaddressed financial barriers, and which are stuck waiting for clerkship placements. Retaining students through to graduation, researchers argue, is just as important as fair admissions policy.

    Ultimately, the study argues that public debate has wrongly fixated on the single question of whether intake should be 30 or 60 students. The real solution requires a full systemic overhaul: first, the Surinamese government must clearly define how many physicians the country actually needs, and where those practitioners are most needed to address gaps in care. Only then can the country build out sufficient training capacity, expand clerkship placements, implement early guidance starting in secondary school, and put support systems in place to help admitted students complete their training and join the domestic workforce. As the report concludes: when talented students are locked out of the program, lose their place along the pathway, or face years of delay due to insufficient capacity, the failure is not with the students—it is with a system that has not kept up with the country’s needs.

  • Brunswijk: ABOP-directeuren worden gecriminaliseerd

    Brunswijk: ABOP-directeuren worden gecriminaliseerd

    On Monday, Suriname’s National Assembly became the stage for a sharp political confrontation, as Ronnie Brunswijk, leader of the ABOP party faction, raised heated criticism over what he claims is a sustained campaign to pressure and criminalize senior officials tied to his political bloc. The trigger for Brunswijk’s public outcry was an ongoing leadership dispute at the Telecommunicatie Autoriteit Suriname (TAS), Suriname’s national telecommunications regulator, where the body’s supervisory board of commissioners recently tabled a formal proposal to suspend TAS Director Wendy Jap-A-Joe. That proposal has since been rejected by Suriname’s Council of Ministers, which refused to advance the disciplinary action.

    Brunswijk used the debate to call on the national government to issue a full, transparent explanation for the developments unfolding at TAS. He told the assembly that an intractable personal and professional conflict between Emanuel Scheek, TAS’s president-commissioner, and Jap-A-Joe has driven the push for suspension, arguing that the director is facing unsubstantiated allegations with no credible evidence to back the claims of wrongdoing.

    Beyond the immediate TAS dispute, Brunswijk framed the incident as part of a broader systemic pattern targeting ABOP across Suriname’s state-owned enterprises. He claimed that similar conflicts between executive leadership and supervisory boards have emerged at multiple other state agencies, all following the same script: every director appointed by ABOP is being publicly targeted and smeared as a criminal, without due process.

    The ABOP leader made clear that the ongoing situation has taken a personal toll, telling lawmakers bluntly that he is growing tired of the repeated targeting. He added that he himself is facing mounting external pressure over the issue, intensifying his call for the government to clarify the full facts of the case to the public and the assembly.

    Responding to Brunswijk’s remarks on the floor of the National Assembly was Vice President Gregory Rusland, who confirmed the basic details of the dispute: the supervisory board did formally submit a request to suspend the TAS director, but the Council of Ministers ultimately declined to approve the measure. Rusland pushed back on the framing of the situation as a political witch hunt, emphasizing that regular internal oversight is a necessary and legitimate function for all public sector institutions and state bodies. “Oversight is not an act of hostility,” Rusland stated, noting that routine accountability checks should be allowed to proceed at any time. However, he added that based on the information available to the Council of Ministers when the proposal was reviewed, approving an immediate suspension of the director was deemed unreasonable. For the time being, Rusland concluded, that rejection remains the final standing position of the Suriname government.

  • Miljoenenschuld zet gezondheidszorg in het binnenland op scherp

    Miljoenenschuld zet gezondheidszorg in het binnenland op scherp

    A leading healthcare provider delivering critical primary medical services to Suriname’s remote interior regions is sliding into an increasingly dire financial crisis, with unpaid government funds triggering cascading disruptions to care for thousands of vulnerable residents, multiple organization insiders have confirmed.

    De Medische Zending Health Care Suriname (MZPHCS), which operates under contract from the Suriname Ministry of Public Health to run primary care services across the country’s under-served inland areas, has not received any operational funding allocations for the 2026 service year, even as the year enters its third quarter. Unpaid outstanding debts have now climbed to millions of Surinamese dollars, and the mounting crisis is already directly impacting access to medical support in isolated communities.

    The most immediate and dangerous impact comes from disrupted air transport, a service MZPHCS relies on completely to respond to medical emergencies, restock critical supplies, and transport clinical staff to remote inland sites. With payment arrears reaching unsustainable levels, several commercial air carriers have already cut off services to the organization. Even Mission Aviation Fellowship (MAF), the non-profit aviation group that specifically operates in Suriname to support medical outreach and community development, has flagged its concerns over MZPHCS’s unpaid bills, according to Rachel Ten-A-Sang-Beerensteyn, MZPHCS’s Deputy Director for Finance, Facilities and Logistics.

    “Due to our massive outstanding payment backlogs, we can no longer access services from certain airlines,” Ten-A-Sang-Beerensteyn explained in an interview.

    Access to life-saving medications is also under growing strain. While the Suriname government took over a portion of MZPHCS’s outstanding debt to the national State Pharmaceutical Supply Company (BGVS), BGVS does not stock all the medications the organization needs to serve its patient population. This forces MZPHCS to source missing drugs from private suppliers, where it has now also accumulated unpaid balances, further limiting access to essential treatments.

    The financial shortfall has also left the organization’s care infrastructure crumbling across its 58 outpatient clinics spread across the interior. Every single facility requires maintenance of varying degrees of urgency, and some sites have dangerous, unaddressed defects: the delivery room at the Klaaskreek outpatient clinic is missing its entire ceiling, and the pediatric check-up room at the same facility has broken, non-functional windows that cannot be repaired.

    “Our staff are working around the clock to keep our clinics operational,” Ten-A-Sang-Beerensteyn said. “With the extremely limited budget we have available, we can only cover the most minimal, critical repair work. But that is nowhere near enough to address the backlog.” While MZPHCS partners with a range of local and international development organizations, these groups can only provide limited infrastructure support, as capital improvements do not align with their core program mandates.

    MZPHCS’s funding model, which combines contributions from registered insured patients, private donations, and project-specific grants, has long suffered from structural gaps that fail to cover full operational costs, even in non-crisis years. The 2026 funding delay has only worsened this chronic instability. “We are already in the third quarter of 2026, and we have still not received any operational funds for this service year,” Ten-A-Sang-Beerensteyn noted. Chronic delays in government disbursements create recurring funding gaps that force the organization to constantly improvise to keep services running. As an example, she explained that logistics staff must now repeatedly contact airlines on an ad-hoc basis to beg for space to ship essential supplies to care sites, an unstable system that cannot guarantee timely deliveries.

    While the Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Labor (VWA) has stepped in on multiple occasions to provide ad-hoc relief to address MZPHCS’s immediate financial shortfalls, no long-term structural solution has been implemented to date. As a non-governmental organization contracted to advance the government’s own primary care access goals for the interior, MZPHCS leadership is now calling for permanent, structured dialogue between organization leadership, the Ministry of Public Health, and the Ministry of Finance and Planning to resolve the crisis.

    Ten-A-Sang-Beerensteyn emphasized that this dialogue would allow MZPHCS to share on-the-ground insights into the actual costs of delivering care to remote areas, and address a widespread lack of understanding among policymakers and the general public about the unique financial challenges inland care provision creates. “Structured dialogue can help build a better understanding of the daily financial reality we face,” she said.

  • NRCS pleit voor vervangen koloniale namen

    NRCS pleit voor vervangen koloniale namen

    Fifty-one years after gaining formal independence from Dutch colonial rule, Suriname’s official National Reparation Commission (NRCS) is advancing a sweeping agenda to complete the nation’s decolonization process, calling for structural changes that stretch far beyond financial compensation for historical slavery. The commission outlined its full vision Friday during an official working visit to the Directorate of Culture under Suriname’s Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, where the delegation was welcomed by Director Xiomara Simons and her leadership team.

  • CBWO: Bank koppelt loonafspraken onterecht aan pensioen- en ziektekostenoverleg

    CBWO: Bank koppelt loonafspraken onterecht aan pensioen- en ziektekostenoverleg

    Workers at the Central Bank of Suriname have launched industrial action after bank management tied the full implementation of a binding wage ruling from the national Mediation Council to separate negotiations over employee contributions to pension and healthcare costs, according to Robby Berenstein, chair of the Central Bank Workers’ Organization (CBWO).

    Berenstein emphasized that these two issues are completely unrelated. The union is willing to hold discussions on proposed employee contributions, but rejects management’s demand that those discussions conclude before the Mediation Council’s wage adjustment, one-time lump sum payment, and transport allowance increase are implemented. Citing the union’s position, Berenstein told reporters that workers have now paused their work duties, demanding the Mediation Council’s final ruling be followed exactly as written.

    The dispute stretches back to earlier this year, when CBWO tabled an initial demand for a 35% wage increase for central bank staff. When negotiations between union representatives and bank leadership hit an impasse, the case was referred to the Mediation Council to resolve the deadlock. The independent body ultimately issued a ruling calling for a tiered structural wage increase, ranging from 14% to 16% depending on an employee’s monthly income bracket.

    Under the terms of the ruling, workers earning a monthly salary up to 30,000 Surinamese dollars (SRD) will receive a 16% raise. Staff earning between SRD 30,001 and SRD 90,000 will see increases of 15.5% and 15% in successive income brackets, while employees in the highest earning category (above SRD 90,000) will receive a 14% increase. On average, the overall wage adjustment across all staff sits at approximately 15.1%, per the Mediation Council’s calculations. The ruling also mandates a one-time lump sum payment, with values tied to income brackets: workers in the lowest tier receive one and a half months of salary, which scales down to 1.25 months, one month, and 0.75 months for the highest earning group. Finally, the ruling requires existing transport allowances to be increased by 12%.

    During the mediation process, bank management proposed introducing employee contributions for pension and healthcare costs; currently, CBWO says these costs are not deducted from worker salaries. However, the Mediation Council explicitly declined to set any contribution percentages as part of its final ruling, instead stating that this topic must be addressed in separate, future talks between the two parties. CBWO argues this means the discussion over pension and healthcare contributions should not be a precondition to implementing the agreed wage adjustment, and that any negotiations on contributions should take place within the framework of regular collective bargaining already outlined in the existing collective labor agreement (CLA) between the union and the bank.

    Berenstein noted that the debate over contributions is not simply a question of how large a percentage workers will pay. If employees are required to contribute to these benefits, the union wants clarity on what improvements or guarantees they will receive in return, particularly around the quality of healthcare coverage and pension benefits. This fundamental disagreement over the sequencing of implementation and negotiations has resulted in the current deadlock.

    To date, the central bank has already issued the lump sum payment and increased transport allowances by 12% as required. However, management has only implemented an 11.4% average wage increase, retroactive to January 1, 2026. CBWO rejects this adjustment, saying it does not align with the 14% to 16% tiered increases outlined in the Mediation Council ruling. Berenstein accuses management of deliberately delaying full implementation to force the union to agree to the contribution terms first, saying leadership is attempting to implement the ruling on its own terms rather than following the Mediation Council’s directive.

    While management has not publicly stated that it considers the Mediation Council ruling non-binding, and has repeatedly said it intends to implement the ruling, the core of the conflict centers on how implementation should proceed. According to Berenstein, the existing CLA between CBWO and the central bank explicitly states that any final ruling from the Mediation Council is binding on both parties. While legal experts may disagree on the general binding status of such rulings, the union says the CLA explicitly makes this ruling binding in this specific case.

    Berenstein warned that allowing employers to unilaterally reinterpret and alter Mediation Council rulings would set a dangerous precedent for labor relations across Suriname. CBWO has called on the national government to intervene and monitor the situation. The union leader stressed that work stoppage is not an end goal for CBWO, but a necessary tactic to force management to honor the terms of the ruling. The Mediation Council has called on both parties to meet and discuss the issue on Monday evening, and CBWO has agreed to attend the meeting.

    At that meeting, Berenstein says the union’s core message will be that the ruling must be implemented “to the letter and the spirit.” Following Monday’s talks, the union leadership will present the outcome of the meeting to a general assembly of CBWO members on Tuesday, who will then vote on what further industrial action, if any, will be taken moving forward.

  • Laatste aftelling voor Irak: soeverein of slagveld?

    Laatste aftelling voor Irak: soeverein of slagveld?

    After more than two decades of foreign military engagement that began with the 2003 U.S.-led invasion, Iraq is preparing to mark a historic turning point. On September 30, the U.S.-led international military coalition will formally conclude its mission in the country, transferring full security responsibility to the Iraqi government — a symbolic milestone that Baghdad has framed as the start of a fully sovereign, foreign troop-free era opening October 1.

    In recent weeks, as the deadline has drawn near, speculation around the withdrawal has grown steadily. Iraqi military leadership has now confirmed the timeline officially. Lieutenant General Abdul Amir al-Shammari, head of the Iraqi Armed Forces Commander-in-Chief’s office, confirmed September 30 as the coalition’s final end date in a statement to Iraq’s state news agency INA, matching long-held expectations across political and military circles.

    For Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi, the withdrawal delivers on a core campaign promise made earlier this year. “This step is an essential prerequisite to guide Iraq into a new phase of development and prosperity,” a statement from the prime minister’s office read, framing the post-withdrawal period as a “new era” free of any foreign military presence on Iraqi soil.

    Yet analysts caution that the withdrawal is far more symbolic than transformative for Iraq’s on-the-ground security landscape. Iyad al-Anbar, a political science professor at the University of Baghdad, told Al Jazeera that the bulk of the adjustment has already taken place. Most U.S. troops have long vacated traditional Iraqi military bases across central and southern Iraq, he noted, and are already concentrated solely at the Harir base in Erbil, the capital of Iraq’s autonomous Kurdistan Region.

    “Ultimately, this move will be largely symbolic,” al-Anbar explained. “The U.S. has already ended its active military presence at most major headquarters, including Camp Victory near Baghdad International Airport and even the Green Zone, located just meters from the U.S. embassy in Baghdad.”

    While the coalition’s exit closes a 23-year chapter of foreign military involvement, it opens a critical domestic test for al-Zaidi’s government: consolidating control over all armed factions and centralizing weapons under exclusive state authority — one of the biggest internal challenges Iraq has faced since the 2003 fall of Saddam Hussein.

    Al-Zaidi has reissued a firm ultimatum this week to non-state armed groups: disarm voluntarily, or face prosecution on terrorism charges. The prime minister has stood firm on tying progress on disarmament to the September 30 withdrawal deadline, but al-Anbar points to a major gap in credibility: despite the broad rhetoric, the government has released no concrete details on how the disarmament process will work.

    “Now we are only talking about ‘regulating’ weapons. What is the actual enforcement mechanism? No one is talking about the details,” al-Anbar said.

    Complicating the security landscape further, pro-Iranian armed factions including Kataib Sayyid al-Shuhada, Harakat al-Nujaba, and Kataib Hezbollah have ramped up anti-government and anti-coalition rhetoric in recent weeks. Key leadership positions at Iraq’s Defense and Interior ministries — the two core institutions tasked with implementing the disarmament plan — also remain unfilled, leaving the government without a clear operational backbone for its security push.

    For the United States, the withdrawal aligns with a broader strategic reorientation of foreign policy under the second Trump administration, but it does not signal a full retreat from Iraqi or regional affairs, according to former U.S. diplomat Marlin Hardinger.

    “I think we can say that large-scale conventional military deployment has come to an end in the medium term, but remaining counterterrorism and intelligence operations will continue, particularly focused on protecting the U.S. embassy and consulate,” Hardinger explained. He added that the Trump administration plans to shift its focus to expanding economic and development cooperation with Baghdad, a move designed to boost immediate and medium-term economic outcomes for Iraqi citizens and strengthen al-Zaidi’s domestic standing.

    Even so, the withdrawal faces pushback from multiple quarters. Pro-Israel factions in the U.S. that favor continued direct American military engagement in the Middle East have already voiced opposition, while Gulf Arab states warn that a power vacuum could allow extremist and Iranian-aligned groups to regain territory and influence.

    “The core problem is that the region is far more unstable and volatile today than it was when negotiations over the withdrawal first began,” Hardinger warned.

    One of the most immediate and pressing security consequences of the withdrawal is the removal of U.S. Patriot air defense systems, which have long been deployed in Erbil to serve as the primary shield against Iranian ballistic missiles and drone attacks. Hassan al-Barari, an international relations professor at the University of Jordan, argues that Iraq is not currently prepared to fill that security gap on its own.

    “It is unlikely that the Iraqi state is currently capable of defending its airspace against Iranian missiles and drones if Iran were to launch an attack on Erbil, for example,” al-Barari said. “If Iran continues to send drones and missiles into Iraqi territory, who will intercept them now that the American Patriot systems are leaving? Without a direct security agreement with Tehran, who can stop this Iranian threat?”
    For Iraq, al-Barari argues, the true test of Iraqi sovereignty does not end with the departure of foreign troops — it begins the day after. For al-Zaidi’s government, the ability to secure Iraq’s borders, unify control over weapons, and maintain national independence will define whether the milestone of troop withdrawal delivers on its promise of sovereignty.

    “The ability of the Baghdad government to maintain or fully restore Iraq’s sovereignty is not only linked to the withdrawal of U.S. troops, but also to al-Zaidi’s ability to bring all weapons under state control,” al-Barari said. His outlook for the coming period is cautious: “In my view, events are moving into uncharted territory. If al-Zaidi fails to deliver, Iraq could fall fully under exclusive Iranian influence, creating a dangerous security vacuum. That is exactly the scenario Washington has long warned about and sought to avoid.”

    As the world watches, Iraq prepares for what is being called the greatest test of its modern history. The coalition’s flag will be lowered, but critical questions remain unanswered: who will protect the Kurdistan Region from cross-border rocket attacks? Who will force unregulated militias to disarm? Who will guarantee that Iraq does not slide back into widespread chaos?

    September 30 is not an endpoint. It is a beginning: a period where Iraq will have to prove it can survive and govern without external leadership. Whether it succeeds depends on one prime minister, one fractured government, and a divided nation. The coming weeks will reveal the answer.