标签： Guyana

In a significant diplomatic engagement, numerous high-ranking foreign envoys stationed in Guyana convened with House Speaker Manzoor Nadir at the Parliament Building in Stabroek. This gathering occurred in anticipation of Monday’s pivotal National Assembly session, which will feature both the presentation of the 2026 National Budget and the election of Guyana’s next Opposition Leader.

United States Ambassador Nicole Theriot characterized the encounter as an informal exchange, noting that the initiative originated from within the diplomatic community. “The Speaker generously accommodated our request for dialogue,” Ambassador Theriot explained to journalists, despite repeated attempts by her security detail to limit media interaction. She emphasized that the discussion centered on parliamentary procedures, budgetary considerations, and the impending opposition leadership selection.

The diplomatic contingent included representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Venezuela, and several other nations. When questioned about Speaker Nadir’s recent criticisms of American and Canadian political systems—made in response to diplomatic calls for electing an Opposition Leader to strengthen Guyana’s democratic institutions—Ambassador Theriot declined to disclose specifics. “It would be inappropriate for me to characterize his remarks. That conversation remains with him,” she stated, adding that she did not perceive Nadir’s comments as targeted criticism but rather as legitimate expression of personal perspective.

The upcoming parliamentary meeting is expected to result in the appointment of Azruddin Mohamed, leader of the We Invest in Nationhood party, as Opposition Leader. This anticipated outcome faces resistance from both the ruling People’s Progressive Party and Speaker Nadir, citing Mohamed’s ongoing legal challenges. The United States has sanctioned and indicted Mohamed for alleged financial crimes, and he currently contests extradition proceedings alongside his father.

A significant constitutional crisis has erupted in Guyana’s National Assembly, with the opposition A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) delivering a stern rebuke to House Speaker Manzoor Nadir for his unprecedented criticism of American and Canadian diplomats. The controversy centers on the prolonged vacancy of the Opposition Leader position, a constitutional office that remains unfilled despite mounting international concern.

APNU parliamentarian Dr. Dexter Todd, a legal professional, issued a formal statement condemning the Speaker’s remarks against US Ambassador Nicole Theriot and Canadian High Commissioner Sébastien Sigouin. The diplomats had previously advocated for the timely election of an Opposition Leader to safeguard democratic processes—a position Dr. Todd characterized as supporting constitutional integrity rather than foreign interference.

“When the international community calls for this vacancy to be filled, they are not taking sides. They are standing on the side of the Supremacy of the Constitution,” Dr. Todd asserted, emphasizing that the diplomats were fulfilling their fundamental duty to advocate for democratic principles.

The confrontation escalated when Speaker Nadir questioned the democratic credentials of both nations during his remarks. He challenged Ambassador Theriot regarding the existence of an Opposition Leader in the US system and reminded High Commissioner Sigouin of Canada’s six-month budget delay and its history of unelected prime ministers.

Dr. Todd countered that the Speaker’s personal views must remain subordinate to constitutional obligations when acting in an official capacity. “The Speaker is a human being entitled to his personal views,” he acknowledged, “but the moment he speaks in his official capacity, his personal feelings must be subservient to the Rule of Law.”

The political drama intersects with complex legal matters involving Azruddin Mohamed, leader of the 16-seat We Invest in Nationhood (WIN) party and the most likely candidate for Opposition Leader. Mr. Mohamed and his father face serious international legal challenges, including US sanctions for alleged gold smuggling involving over 10,000 kilograms worth approximately $50 million, plus federal indictments for wire fraud, mail fraud, and money laundering. Extradition proceedings are currently underway, with committal hearings scheduled for February 5.

This situation echoes previous tensions in 2020 when the then-APNU+Alliance For Change administration accused international observers of manipulating election outcomes, though a CARICOM-brokered recount ultimately confirmed the People’s Progressive Party Civic’s victory.

Dr. Todd concluded with a call for constitutional respect above political agendas, stating: “Our international partners expect it, but more importantly, the Guyanese people deserve it.”

A significant political confrontation is unfolding in Guyana’s National Assembly regarding the potential appointment of a sanctioned individual to the nation’s second-highest constitutional position. Attorney General Anil Nandlall, a prominent executive member of the ruling People’s Progressive Party (PPP), has publicly declared opposition to Azruddin Mohamed’s anticipated election as Opposition Leader. Nandlall’s position aligns with that of National Assembly Speaker Manzoor Nadir, who has reluctantly scheduled a meeting of opposition parliamentarians for Monday to formalize the appointment. The controversy stems from United States sanctions against Mohamed and his father for alleged gold smuggling operations involving over 10,000 kilograms of gold valued at approximately US$50 million, resulting in significant tax evasion from the Guyanese government. Additionally, a U.S. Federal Grand Jury has unsealed an 11-count indictment charging the Mohameds with wire fraud, mail fraud, and money laundering, with extradition proceedings currently underway in Guyanese courts. Nandlall characterized the Opposition Leader role as the “alternative president” and warned that those supporting Mohamed’s elevation would face historical judgment for their decision. The political standoff has drawn international attention, with Western nations joining domestic voices in expressing concern about the potential appointment of an internationally sanctioned figure to this crucial governmental position.

Guyana’s political landscape faces an unprecedented constitutional dilemma as National Assembly Speaker Manzoor Nadir reluctantly announced plans to convene a special parliamentary session next Monday. The meeting, scheduled for 10 AM, will determine the election of the country’s Opposition Leader—a position expected to be filled by Azruddin Mohamed, an international fugitive wanted by United States authorities for serious financial crimes.

Speaker Nadir, in a solemn address delivered Tuesday evening, expressed profound discomfort with the constitutional obligation forcing him to oversee an election that would potentially install a wanted criminal as Guyana’s official opposition leader. “I have found myself in this difficult position to hold the election of the Leader of the Opposition when I know that the presumptive Leader of the Opposition to be elected is an international fugitive,” Nadir stated, emphasizing the grave implications for the nation’s democratic integrity.

The political predicament stems from last year’s electoral results where Mohamed’s We Invest in Nationhood (WIN) party secured 16 parliamentary seats, making them the largest opposition bloc ahead of A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) with 12 seats and Forward Guyana Movement with a single seat. Despite Mohamed’s fugitive status, constitutional provisions appear to mandate his election as opposition leader due to his party’s numerical advantage.

Nadir, a veteran Guyanese statesman, issued a stern warning to opposition parliamentarians, stating that those voting for Mohamed would bear full responsibility for tarnishing the dignity of Guyana’s legislative body. “If opposition members of Parliament feel it morally right to elect an international fugitive, then the stain on our parliament and our country rests solely with them,” he declared, highlighting the moral contradiction between legal requirements and ethical governance.

The Speaker additionally criticized both the diplomatic community and segments of the media for amplifying calls to proceed with Mohamed’s election, suggesting that external pressure had complicated an already delicate constitutional process. Nadir repeatedly referred to Mohamed as an “international fugitive” throughout his address, underscoring the gravity of the situation facing Guyana’s democratic institutions.

A significant political dispute has emerged between Guyana’s two main opposition parties, the Partnership for National Unity (APNU) and We Invest in Nationhood (WIN), regarding their inability to initiate collaborative discussions over the past two months.

APNU Parliamentarian Ganesh Mahipaul publicly criticized WIN leadership for failing to confirm scheduling details for meetings initially proposed in November 2023. According to Mahipaul, both parties had progressed to selecting five-member delegations and establishing a preliminary agenda before negotiations stalled. He revealed that one planned meeting was canceled due to APNU parliamentary leader Dr. Terrence Campbell’s out-of-town commitments.

Mahipaul, who also serves as an executive member of the People’s National Congress Reform (PNCR)—APNU’s largest coalition partner—asserted that subsequent attempts to reengage WIN leadership proved unsuccessful. The proposed agenda included critical parliamentary matters such as committee compositions, Public Accounts Committee chairmanship, shadow minister appointments, and sectoral committee leadership.

The parliamentarian expressed frustration with WIN’s perceived lack of genuine interest in forming a unified opposition front against the ruling People’s Progressive Party Civic (PPPC). He specifically questioned WIN Leader Azruddin Mohamed’s motivations, suggesting his current focus centered on personal legal matters rather than parliamentary cooperation.

In response, WIN Leader Azruddin Mohamed expressed strong disapproval of Mahipaul’s characterization, countering that his party had made substantial efforts to initiate talks. Mohamed accused Mahipaul of improperly demanding chairmanship of the influential Public Accounts Committee and referenced his family’s historical financial support for APNU and Mahipaul personally.

Mahipaul acknowledged past financial assistance from Mohamed during a family health emergency but dismissed the relevance to current political discussions. Regarding the PAC chairmanship, Mahipaul clarified he had made a proposal—not a demand—based on APNU’s parliamentary experience, while offering support for WIN’s leadership of other committees.

The conflict reflects deeper tensions between the parties, with APNU controlling 12 parliamentary seats compared to WIN’s 16 seats, and the Forward Guyana Movement holding one seat. This political friction dates back to the 2025 election campaign when APNU accused WIN of voter poaching through financial inducements in traditional APNU strongholds.