博客

Trinidad and Tobago has cemented its place as a trailblazer within the U.S.-led Shield of the Americas coalition, becoming the first member state to align with Washington in labeling 25 transnational criminal groups as foreign terrorist organizations. The landmark move earned public praise from top U.S. hemispheric affairs official Juan Pablo Segura, who framed the decision as a major leap forward in the coalition’s shared fight against the cross-border harm of narcoterrorism.

Just days ahead of the designation announcement, Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar joined U.S. President Donald Trump and other regional leaders at a high-level Shield of the Americas summit to coordinate collective security strategies. Shortly after that meeting, she took the stage at the 81st United Nations General Assembly in New York to outline Trinidad and Tobago’s global security agenda ahead of its 2027-2028 term on the UN Security Council.

During her UN address, Persad-Bissessar emphasized that transnational criminal networks pose disproportionate risks to small island states like her own. Trinidad and Tobago, she noted, already bears the direct costs of these activities, from rising gang violence and drug trafficking to the uncontrolled flow of illegal weapons and illicit funds across its borders. Restoring public safety has been a core priority of her administration, she added, and the government has deepened collaboration with the U.S. and other international partners to dismantle criminal syndicates operating in the region. She confirmed that countering the illegal cross-border movement of firearms and narcotics will be a top policy priority during her country’s Security Council tenure, with plans to push for improved weapons tracing mechanisms, expanded cross-border intelligence sharing, enhanced maritime and border cooperation, and tighter coordination between source, transit and destination nations for illicit goods.

The landmark decision has sparked nuanced discussion among regional security experts. In an interview with local outlet *Express* following the official announcement, prominent regional security consultant Dr. Garvin Heerah acknowledged the clear security benefits Trinidad and Tobago can gain from deeper alignment within the Shield of the Americas initiative. Launched by the United States in March 2026, the coalition’s stated core goals include combating drug cartels, transnational criminal networks, illegal migration and foreign interference in the Western Hemisphere. Heerah noted that the entire Caribbean region, including Trinidad and Tobago, faces a growing array of transnational threats — from drug and weapons trafficking and human smuggling to maritime crime, money laundering, cyberattacks and organized criminal networks. Expanded intelligence sharing, coordinated cross-border operations, enhanced maritime surveillance, tightened border security and closer law enforcement cooperation would deliver tangible benefits to Trinidad and Tobago and its Caribbean neighbors, he said.

At the same time, Heerah urged policymakers to carefully weigh the geopolitical implications of the partnership, warning that the country must guard against advancing a foreign security agenda at the expense of local interests. “The important question, however, is whose security agenda are we advancing, and how do we ensure that Caribbean interests remain at the centre of the equation?” he said. Heerah stressed that Trinidad and Tobago’s participation in the coalition goes far beyond a standard security cooperation arrangement, carrying clear geopolitical weight given competing strategic priorities: the U.S. holds broad strategic interests across the Western Hemisphere, while Trinidad and Tobago and the broader CARICOM bloc have their own distinct national and regional priorities.

Heerah clarified that closer cooperation does not require surrendering national sovereignty, nor should sovereignty be used as an excuse to reject mutually beneficial security collaboration. “For me, the principle should be partnership without dependency; cooperation without compromising sovereignty,” he outlined. He called on the Trinidad and Tobago government to secure clear, public clarity on key terms of the partnership, including what types of intelligence will be exchanged, the legal framework that governs data sharing, who retains control over shared intelligence, and what operational powers foreign partner forces will hold within Trinidad and Tobago’s borders. He also raised questions about the rules governing joint operations and how potential disagreements will be managed if U.S. and Trinidad and Tobago strategic interests diverge down the line. Heerah emphasized that these questions are not anti-American, but rather fundamental responsible national security planning for any sovereign state.

Two major Trinidad and Tobago organizations have thrown their support behind a controversial government legislative push to raise minimum legal age limits for alcohol, tobacco, cannabis and gambling, though one industry group has flagged critical gaps in enforcement planning.

The administration led by Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar announced via social media this week that it will table The Miscellaneous Provisions (Alcohol, Cannabis, Dangerous Drugs, Gambling and Tobacco) Bill, 2026 before national parliament imminently. If passed, the legislation will overhaul the country’s age restrictions for regulated goods and activities: lifting the minimum legal age for purchasing, possessing and consuming alcohol and tobacco from 18 to 21, while setting a new 25-year minimum age threshold for cannabis access and all forms of legal gambling.

Road safety non-governmental organization Arrive Alive has fully endorsed the proposed changes, grounding its support in decades of public health research on adolescent development. Sharon Inglefield, president of Arrive Alive, explained that peer-reviewed research consistently confirms that the human brain does not finish full structural and cognitive development until approximately 25 years of age. Early exposure to alcohol, nicotine and other controlled substances, she noted, not only disrupts healthy neural growth but also impairs core cognitive functions including problem-solving, impulse control and decision-making.

Beyond its support for the legislative reform, Inglefield highlighted that the NGO runs a free, evidence-based education program for primary and secondary schools across the country designed to teach young people about the risks of impaired decision-making from alcohol. The program centers on an interactive experience where students wear specialized alcohol-impairment goggles that simulate the disorienting visual and motor effects of intoxication, helping them experience first-hand the dangers of drinking, particularly for inexperienced road users. Inglefield added that underage drinking also ties directly to the country’s persistent road safety crisis of drunk driving, a issue Arrive Alive has prioritized for decades, and called on schools across the nation to book the interactive program for their campuses.

The Bar Owners Association of Trinidad and Tobago (BOATT) has also confirmed it does not oppose the core goal of raising the minimum drinking age to protect younger people from harm, but association president Satesh Moonasar warned that the legislation will fail to meet its intended objectives without complementary policy changes to address enforcement challenges. Moonasar pointed out that current rules do not require Trinidad and Tobago residents to carry official national identification at all times, making it nearly impossible for licensed vendors and law enforcement to reliably verify the age of people purchasing or consuming alcohol.

He raised pointed questions about unregulated informal sales, noting that illegal alcohol vendors operating out of small unlicensed stores are unlikely to enforce age checks even after the law changes. For public consumption of alcohol, which remains legal in Trinidad and Tobago, Moonasar asked how police officers would confirm a person’s age if they are suspected of underage drinking but do not carry ID. Echoing a previous proposal from Homeland Security Minister Roger Alexander to mandate universal carry of national ID, Moonasar argued that the two policies must be implemented together to work effectively. Without mandatory ID, he explained, police would be forced to take all suspected underage drinkers into police stations to contact parents, creating unnecessary logistical and operational burdens that will undermine consistent enforcement of the new age rules. Moonasar emphasized that BOATT’s concerns are not intended to block the reform, but to push the government to address critical gaps before the bill goes into effect, to ensure it actually delivers on its goal of reducing underage access to alcohol and tobacco.

A sharp public feud has erupted in Trinidad and Tobago’s Senate this week, after Independent Senator Anthony Vieira delivered a sarcastic, cutting rebuke to Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s inflammatory verbal attacks on independent legislators, while issuing a dire warning about a proposed new procurement bill that he argues puts the public purse at grave risk of misuse.

The conflict traces back to a recent unanimous vote by the nine-member Independent Senate caucus against the government’s Special Operations Bill, which triggered a wave of harsh criticism from Persad-Bissessar. The Prime Minister labeled the independent lawmakers “satanic”, “demons”, and “Luciferian monsters”, claiming they harbored “demonic hatred” for law-abiding citizens, and announced that her administration would no longer consider any amendments put forward by the Independent bench.

Vieira, firing back in his address to the Senate Wednesday, leaned into the prime minister’s insults with biting sarcasm, quipping that his supposed demonic status granted him unique insight into the greed and moral rot that can plague public officials handling state funds. “Now, Mr President, a benefit of being satanic and demonic is that I have insight into the souls of men,” Vieira said. “I understand those whose moral compasses and codes are compromised, as I understand the seven deadly sins, in particular, greed.”

The senator’s retribution came as he launched a full-throated attack on the 2026 Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Property (Amendment) Bill, a piece of government legislation framed as a measure to streamline business operations. Vieira warned that the proposed changes to the existing procurement framework would erode critical anti-corruption safeguards, systematically marginalize the independent Office of Procurement Regulation (OPR), and open new doors for self-interested actors to siphon public funds.

Persad-Bissessar’s refusal to accept amendments from independent legislators directly shaped Vieira’s approach to the bill: he told the chamber he had opted not to spend time drafting improvements, after his earlier work on amendments for another bill went entirely ignored. “I had hoped that the benches would have worked together to avoid a financial ambush dressed up as the ease of doing business. But in light of the Prime Minister’s declared refusal to accept amendments from the Independent bench, I decided to save my time and energy,” he explained. “On a special zones bill, I spent two days working on amendments to improve the legislation. To no avail. That’s not happening today.”

Vieira pushed back against the dangerous assumption underpinning the bill, arguing that legislators cannot craft public financial rules on the premise that every official entrusted with state money will act with integrity. Pointing to long-standing patterns of misconduct in Trinidad and Tobago, he noted repeated allegations of “fraud, corruption, favouritism, conflicts of interest, contract splitting, and misuse of public resources.” He invoked two locally well-known phrases — “the land of Bobol” and the term “Trickydadian” — to illustrate the widespread cultural awareness that many actors actively seek to exploit loopholes in public rules for personal gain.

“We cannot afford to sacrifice the guardrails of good governance on the altar of convenience,” Vieira warned. “In this country, the danger of corruption is not abstract. Here, corruption is a real and present danger.” He even raised a provocative hypothesis: that special interest grifters are already positioning themselves to access public funds if the bill passes.

The senator rejected the framing that the reform forces a choice between regulatory efficiency and accountability, arguing that the goal should be to build a procurement system aligned with the core accountability mandates of the original 2015 Public Procurement Act. While he acknowledged that the legislation could be improved with targeted changes, he emphasized that without robust safeguards, the bill creates massive opportunity for abuse. “It will shield grifters from accountability and consequence,” he said, adding that the core question at stake is how much unaccountable discretion the state should be allowed to exercise over public funds.

Using vivid imagery to describe the impact of the reforms on existing protections, Vieira compared the current procurement regime to a fortified castle built to protect national assets from exploitation. “When crafting the parent Act, we try to put a moat and castle wall between our national assets and those who would seek to plunder,” he said. “I fear that with this legislation, we are lowering the drawbridge and we are leaving the castle door wide open and defenceless.”

Though the OPR will technically remain in place after the amendment, Vieira warned that the changes will strip the regulator of any meaningful enforcement power, leaving the watchdog sidelined just like the independent senators themselves. “The regulator may still be standing at her sentry post, but now her arms are going to be folded as she is weaponless,” he said. “Sadly, like us on the Independent bench, there are those who would like to see her too marginalised, helpless, or made useless.”

Vieira concluded that the bill represents a harmful step backward for governance, with risks that far outweigh any potential benefits. Closing as he opened, he leaned back into the prime minister’s insults to drive home his opposition: “Mr President, it’s going to take a lot more than holy water and mantras to get me to vote in support of this bill.”