博客

In a penetrating analysis of U.S. foreign policy, psychologist and political commentator Marcelo Colussi examines the enduring American campaign against Cuba, revealing deeper motivations beyond conventional geopolitical interests. Colussi contends that Washington’s persistent hostility toward the Cuban revolution—spanning over six decades and multiple administrations—represents a unique case in the annals of imperial aggression.

According to Colussi, the United States’ relentless pursuit to undermine Cuba’s socialist system defies typical patterns of imperial behavior where resource exploitation or business interests typically drive foreign intervention. Instead, Cuba presents an exceptional circumstance: a nation that has constructed a functioning socialist model demonstrating remarkable sovereignty and dignity directly within the sphere of American influence.

The analyst documents how successive U.S. administrations, regardless of political affiliation, have consistently manufactured justifications for their imperial adventures. This pattern of constructing absurd narratives, Colussi argues, serves as a standard operating procedure in Washington’s foreign policy toolkit. Each fabricated pretext, no matter how logically untenable, effectively serves its purpose in legitimizing aggressive actions.

Colussi particularly emphasizes the extraordinary nature of the ongoing economic blockade—a measure globally condemned yet persistently intensified. Despite worldwide repudiation and numerous United Nations resolutions demanding its termination, this coercive economic warfare continues to target the Cuban people. The psychologist notes that after exhausting countless tactics to destabilize the Cuban system, the current administration under Donald Trump has remarkably classified the island nation as an “unusual and extraordinary threat”—a designation that reveals more about American anxiety than Cuban aggression.

This enduring confrontation, Colussi concludes, ultimately demonstrates Washington’s profound discomfort with any successful alternative to capitalist hegemony, especially when developed so close to its borders.

In a striking visual protest against American foreign policy, the European Commission’s Berlaymont building in Brussels became the canvas for a dramatic projection campaign. Utilizing advanced video mapping technology, activists emblazoned the structure’s façade with messages reading “Hands Off Cuba” and “Stop the US Blockade.”

The demonstration was orchestrated by the Belgian association Cubanismo.be, which condemned what it characterized as the Trump administration’s intensified efforts to economically strangle the Caribbean nation. The group specifically highlighted recent oil embargo measures that compound the six-decade-long economic, commercial, and financial blockade against Cuba.

Protest organizers accused Washington of deliberately targeting essential services, alleging attempts to paralyze hospital operations and deprive Cuban citizens of basic energy and food resources. Cubanismo.be representatives framed this escalation as retaliation for Cuba’s continued resistance to American imperialist policies.

“While the United States exports conflict worldwide, Cuba exports international solidarity,” declared one member during the event, referencing the nation’s deployment of medical personnel across the globe during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The projection protest followed a Saturday gathering at Brussels Central Station where participants in the “Hands Off Cuba” campaign demonstrated their support for the Cuban people. Juan Antonio Fernandez, Cuba’s ambassador to Belgium and the European Union, expressed official gratitude for the solidarity shown in response to what he termed “Trump’s crusade” against his nation.

At a United Nations human rights session, Cuban diplomat Roberto Cabanas delivered a forceful condemnation of American economic policies toward his nation, characterizing them as an act of aggression against the Cuban populace. Cabanas asserted that these unilateral coercive measures are designed to inflict collective punishment, thereby constituting a flagrant violation of fundamental human rights.

The representative detailed the extent of these policies, highlighting Washington’s threats to impose trade tariffs on any nation that supplies oil to Cuba. This tactic, he argued, is a deliberate strategy to coerce the international community into becoming complicit in what he termed an ‘energy blockade’ aimed at crippling the island nation.

Cabanas dismissed the foundational premise for these actions—the long-standing U.S. classification of Cuba as an ‘unusual and extraordinary threat’ to its national security—as an absurd pretext. He exposed the true objective behind these draconian measures: to paralyze Cuba’s economic and social infrastructure and deliberately generate widespread suffering among millions of Cuban citizens.

In his address to the Human Rights Council, Cabanas issued a direct challenge, emphasizing that the body ‘cannot remain silent in the face of these criminal acts.’ He framed his nation’s plight within a broader, more complex international context, noting that the 61st session of the Council convenes as the entire multilateral system and its institutions face direct attack from powerful nations undermining global cooperation.