分类: politics

  • Cuba ‘ready’ for possible US attack, says president

    Cuba ‘ready’ for possible US attack, says president

    On the 65th anniversary of the United States’ botched Bay of Pigs invasion, Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel delivered a resolute address to thousands of rally-goers in Havana Thursday, confirming the Caribbean island nation has completed defensive preparations for any potential new military attack by Washington amid months of rapidly escalating pressure from the Trump administration.

    “We have no desire for military confrontation, but it remains our fundamental responsibility to be ready. We prepare to deter conflict, and should aggression prove unavoidable, we prepare to emerge victorious,” Diaz-Canel stated to the assembled crowd. His remarks came as tensions have surged in recent months: after the Trump administration moved to oust Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro and escalated hostilities with Iran, repeated public hints from Trump that Cuba would be “next” have pushed the Cuban government to brace for possible offensive action.

    While high-level backchannel talks between the long-time ideological adversaries have been held to de-escalate tensions, US media reports indicate these discussions have failed to produce any meaningful breakthrough. Mariela Castro, daughter of former Cuban President Raul Castro, emphasized that the Cuban people remain open to constructive dialogue with Washington, but will never put their sovereign political system on the negotiating table. She also confirmed that 94-year-old Raul Castro, who oversaw the landmark 2015 detente between the two nations under former US President Barack Obama – a diplomatic shift Trump later reversed – maintains indirect involvement in the ongoing talks. Current reports also identify Raul Castro’s grandson, Colonel Raul Rodriguez Castro, as one of the Cuban negotiators participating in the discussions.

    Diaz-Canel acknowledged that the current geopolitical moment is “very grave” but reaffirmed Cuba’s unwavering commitment to the socialist path first proclaimed by Fidel Castro on April 16, 1961 – just days before the original Bay of Pigs invasion. That 1961 operation, launched two years after Fidel Castro’s revolutionary government took power and nationalized US-owned assets and enterprises on the island, saw 1,400 anti-Castro Cuban exiles based in Miami, trained and funded by the Central Intelligence Agency, land at the Bahía de Cochinos (Bay of Pigs) roughly 155 miles south of Havana. Over the course of five days of fighting from April 15 to 19, 1961, Cuban revolutionary forces defeated the invasion force, delivering a humiliating intelligence and military setback to the United States.

    Six and a half decades later, Cuba once again finds itself the target of US hostility. Following the arrest of Maduro in Caracas, the Trump administration imposed a full oil blockade on Cuba, exacerbating what is already the island’s most severe economic and energy crisis in 30 years. Havana has long pinned its economic struggles on the decades-long US trade embargo, implemented shortly after Castro took power and still in effect today, with the recent oil blockade worsening existing hardships. Diaz-Canel pushed back against US framing that labels Cuba a “failed state”, arguing instead that “Cuba is not a failed state, it’s a besieged state.”

    For attendees at the anniversary rally, the spirit of 1961 remains alive today. Eighty-two-year-old Maria Reguiero, who joined the gathering in Havana, emphasized that just as Cubans rallied to defend their revolution six decades ago, the nation stands united today: “We are ready to defend our sovereignty, whatever the cost.”

  • US to blockade Iran ports ‘as long as it takes’—Pentagon chief

    US to blockade Iran ports ‘as long as it takes’—Pentagon chief

    In a blunt press briefing held at the Pentagon on Thursday, United States Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a stark warning to Iran: Washington will maintain a full blockade of the country’s ports for however long is required to force a negotiated settlement, and will launch new military strikes if Tehran rejects a diplomatic outcome.

    Hegseth made clear the consequences of Iran walking away from talks, stating, “If Iran chooses poorly, then they will have a blockade and bombs dropping on infrastructure, power and energy.”

    The blockade officially went into effect at 14:00 GMT this Monday, launching just one day after a new round of peace negotiations in Pakistan concluded without any breakthrough agreement between the involved parties. Dan Caine, the highest-ranking active U.S. military officer, clarified that the restrictions are universal, applying to all commercial and military vessels sailing to or from Iranian territorial ports, no matter what flag they sail under.

    Standing alongside Hegseth during the briefing, Caine added that non-compliance will be met with immediate force, but noted that so far, 13 vessels bound for Iranian ports have chosen to alter course and avoid confrontation.

    Hegseth also used the briefing to accuse Iranian leadership of attempting to recover and reactivate military equipment that survived five weeks of joint U.S.-Israeli airstrikes across the country. Speaking directly to Iranian officials, he asserted that U.S. intelligence is fully tracking all movements of remaining military assets, arguing that Tehran’s efforts to rebuild its capabilities are futile while U.S. military position continues to strengthen.

    “You are digging out your remaining launchers and missiles with no ability to replace them — you have no defense industry, no ability to replenish your offensive or defensive capabilities,” Hegseth said.

    Admiral Brad Cooper, commander of U.S. Central Command which oversees all American military operations across the Middle East, confirmed that U.S. forces are using the current lull in active large-scale strikes to bolster their own position. He emphasized that the U.S. military is rearming, refitting, and refining its operational tactics to prepare for any future escalation, noting that no other global military can adapt to changing battlefield conditions as quickly as the United States.

  • Former gov’t minister Hugh Hart dies; PM hails him for ‘distinguished service to Jamaica’

    Former gov’t minister Hugh Hart dies; PM hails him for ‘distinguished service to Jamaica’

    KINGSTON, Jamaica — Jamaica’s legal and political spheres are mourning the passing of Hugh Hart, a former government minister and esteemed attorney who died on Thursday at the age of 96, leaving behind a decades-long legacy of public and professional service to the Caribbean nation.

    Prime Minister Dr Andrew Holness led tributes to the late public servant, who held multiple senior Cabinet positions between the mid-1980s and late 1980s. Holness emphasized that Hart dedicated more than half a century of distinguished work to Jamaica, contributing both to national governance and the development of the country’s legal sector.

    Hart’s public service career spanned 13 years as a member of the Jamaican Senate from 1980 to 1993. During his tenure in Cabinet, he served as Minister of Mining and Energy from 1983 to 1989, and additionally took on the role of Minister of Tourism from 1984 to 1989. At the time of his Cabinet service, his brother-in-law, the late former Prime Minister Edward Seaga, led the Jamaican government.

    In a social media statement announcing Hart’s passing, Holness noted that the former minister provided steadfast leadership to dozens of core national institutions, laying the groundwork for sustained growth and stability across some of Jamaica’s most economically critical sectors.

    “As an attorney, he earned widespread respect for his specialized work in commercial law, and his expert guidance on matters ranging from taxation and real estate to corporate restructuring,” Holness added. “His influence stretched far beyond the walls of the courtroom, leaving a meaningful imprint on national policy and governance practices.”

    “Jamaica has lost a committed servant of the people. We honour his life, his work, and his contribution to the nation,” the prime minister concluded.

    Born in St Andrew on Boxing Day 1929 to Clinton Hart and Eily deCordova-Hart, Hart’s record of excellence began early in his academic career. He enrolled at Munro College in 1940, where he stood out as a top performer both in academics and intercollegiate sports.

    Following his graduation from Munro College, Hart pursued higher legal education at The Queen’s College, University of Oxford. While at Oxford, he earned a Master of Laws degree, and also represented the college in cricket, hockey, and tennis, maintaining his passion for competitive sports.

    Hart was called to the Bar at London’s Gray’s Inn in 1953, and three years later, in 1956, he was formally admitted to practice as a solicitor in Jamaica. He went on to become a founding partner of Hart Muirhead Fatta, one of Jamaica’s most prominent commercial law firms.

    Independent industry rankings repeatedly recognized Hart’s professional standing: he was named one of Jamaica’s leading commercial lawyers by both the widely respected Chambers Global directory and the International Financial Law Review. His deep expertise in commercial law, corporate finance, and conveyancing also allowed him to pursue his long-held passion for pioneering residential and commercial real estate development across the region.

    For more than 30 years, Hart served as a director for multiple property development firms operating in Jamaica and the Cayman Islands. He also held leadership roles across key public and private entities, including serving as a director and former chairman of Jamaica Flour Mills Limited, chairman of the Jamaica Bauxite Institute, Carreras Group Limited, the Petroleum Corporation of Jamaica, and the Bauxite & Alumina Trading Company Limited, in addition to sitting on the boards of dozens of other organizations across Jamaica and the Cayman Islands.

    One of Hart’s most high-stakes tests as public servant came during his tenure as mining minister, when the global alumina market entered a steep downturn. Driven partially by lingering aftereffects of a global recession, the collapse forced the closure of Reynolds Mines in 1984, with Alcoa and Alpart facilities shutting down shortly after. The crisis left Alcan as the only major operator in the sector, throwing Jamaica’s core bauxite and alumina industry — then the lifeline of the country’s economy — into chaos and putting its future at severe risk.

    Working alongside Seaga and senior technocrats including Dr Carlton Davis, Hart rolled out a series of unprecedented policy and diplomatic measures to save the critical industry, and with it, Jamaica’s national economy. A key part of this push was a high-level delegation trip to Washington D.C. to meet with then-U.S. President Ronald Reagan, where the team successfully persuaded the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) to purchase 3.6 million tonnes of Jamaican bauxite to add to the United States’ strategic national stockpile. This single intervention lifted annual Jamaican bauxite production to 6.5 million tonnes, after output had plummeted to just 2.9 million tonnes in 1985.

    The delegation also secured a second landmark agreement, which saw the GSA barter American grain for an additional 2 million tonnes of Jamaican bauxite, further stabilizing the sector.

    For his decades of service to the bauxite and alumina industry and the Jamaican legal profession, Hart was awarded the Order of Jamaica, one of the country’s highest national honors, in 2011. Two years later, in 2013, he received a formal honor from the Jamaica Bar Association, and was later inducted into the Munro College Old Boys’ Association Hall of Fame in recognition of his lifetime of achievement.

  • Trump says Israel, Lebanon agree to 10-day ceasefire

    Trump says Israel, Lebanon agree to 10-day ceasefire

    In a major diplomatic announcement from Washington D.C., former and current U.S. President Donald Trump has revealed that Israeli and Lebanese officials have reached a preliminary agreement to implement a 10-day ceasefire set to commence at 5 p.m. EST Thursday. However, critical questions remain unanswered about whether the Iran-aligned militant group Hezbollah will uphold the truce.

    Per Trump’s public post on his Truth Social platform, the tentative ceasefire deal emerged from what he described as productive, high-level discussions with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun. The talks come just two days after formal peace negotiations between Israeli and Lebanese delegations were convened in Washington, marking the latest step in U.S.-led efforts to de-escalate months of open conflict along the Israel-Lebanon border.

    “These two Leaders have agreed that in order to achieve PEACE between their Countries, they will formally begin a 10 Day CEASEFIRE at 5 P.M. EST,” Trump wrote in his signature all-caps emphasis for key terms. He added that he has already instructed Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine to collaborate closely with both national governments to turn the temporary truce into a long-term, sustainable peace agreement.

    Framing the diplomatic push as another milestone in his self-described record of global conflict resolution, Trump claimed, “It has been my Honor to solve 9 Wars across the World, and this will be my 10th, so let’s, GET IT DONE!” This conflict traces back to February 28, when Trump joined Israel in launching open military hostilities against Iran. Shortly after the offensive began, Hezbollah entered the fray in support of its patron Tehran, launching sustained rocket attacks against Israeli targets and dragging Lebanon into the broader Middle East war.

    Months of sustained Israeli military operations in Lebanon have exacted a devastating humanitarian toll: official counts confirm more than 2,000 Lebanese have been killed in Israeli airstrikes and ground operations, over one million people have been displaced from their homes, and Israeli ground forces have established a presence in southern Lebanon.

    While Trump noted late Wednesday that Aoun and Netanyahu were scheduled to hold direct talks on Thursday to move the process forward, no independent confirmation of that meeting has emerged as of Thursday morning, leaving the ceasefire’s implementation still uncertain amid conflicting signals on the ground.

  • Guyana calls for immediate end to Gaza blockade, renews call for justice for Palestinians

    Guyana calls for immediate end to Gaza blockade, renews call for justice for Palestinians

    ISTANBUL, TURKEY – During the second meeting of the Group of Parliaments in Support of Palestine, held alongside the 152nd Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) Assembly on Wednesday, Guyana’s top human services official has amplified a urgent global demand for immediate expanded humanitarian access to Gaza and an immediate end to Israel’s blockade of the enclave. Dr. Vindhya Persaud, Guyana’s Minister of Human Services and Social Security, used the high-profile international platform to sound the alarm that ongoing armed conflict in the region is inflicting a disproportionately catastrophic harm on Palestinian women and girls.

    In her address to the gathering of parliamentary leaders from across the globe, Persaud framed the gendered impact of the Gaza crisis as part of a deeply troubling, widespread global trend. She noted that as armed conflicts escalate in regions around the world, women and girls are consistently pushed to the front lines of suffering, facing elevated risks of gender-based violence, systematic exploitation, and extreme deprivation that leave them disproportionately displaced and bereft of basic necessities.

    Persaud characterized the current situation in Gaza as one of the most devastating humanitarian catastrophes of the 21st century, pointing to the near-total collapse of critical public infrastructure and essential services that has unfolded since the outbreak of renewed hostilities on October 7, 2023. She argued that the deliberate weaponization of life-saving humanitarian aid, paired with the staggering scale of civilian suffering in the enclave, amounts to a catastrophic moral failure of the global international community to uphold its core commitments to human rights and human dignity.

    Beyond her call for immediate action on Gaza, Persaud reaffirmed Guyana’s long-standing, unwavering support for the fundamental right of the Palestinian people to self-determination. She emphasized the South American nation’s firm commitment to a negotiated two-state solution as the only sustainable path to lasting peace in the region, and noted that Guyana has consistently backed all United Nations resolutions that advance the cause of peace and justice for the Palestinian people. Guyana formally recognized the State of Palestine as a sovereign nation back in 2011, and continues to actively advocate for Palestinian statehood across multilateral global forums.

    To illustrate how nations can center gender justice in both conflict and peacetime policy, Persaud drew a parallel between her government’s international advocacy and domestic gender equity reforms implemented in Guyana. She highlighted that the nation has recently strengthened legal frameworks addressing family violence and sexual offenses, established specialized courts to hear gender-based violence cases, rolled out secure digital incident reporting systems, and opened dedicated “Hope and Justice Centers” that provide wrap-around support services for survivors of violence. She stressed that these domestic reforms underscore Guyana’s core commitment to guaranteeing access to justice for all women, regardless of context.

    Closing her address, Persaud emphasized that expanding women’s empowerment, particularly through advancing economic independence, is a non-negotiable foundation for both recovery during active conflict and long-term reconstruction in post-conflict societies.

  • ‘A battle of massive proportions,’ Gonsalves says of amendments

    ‘A battle of massive proportions,’ Gonsalves says of amendments

    A major political showdown has erupted in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, as opposition leader Ralph Gonsalves announced Wednesday that his Unity Labour Party (ULP) will mount both legal challenges and widespread political resistance against the ruling New Democratic Party (NDP)’s planned constitutional amendments, set for parliamentary debate next Tuesday.

    Gonsalves, speaking on ULP-owned Star Radio, framed the proposed changes as an unprecedented power grab, saying “Today is a day where we have to commence our resistance to this New Democratic Party (NDP) dictatorship.” The amendments, he explained, are directly tied to an ongoing election petition challenging the eligibility of Prime Minister Godwin Friday and Foreign Minister Dwight “Fitz” Bramble to hold parliamentary seats.

    The petition was filed by the two ULP candidates who ran against Friday and Bramble in the November 2024 general election, where the ULP—after 25 consecutive years in power—was ousted in a landslide result that left the party holding just one of parliament’s 15 seats. The ULP’s core argument rests on a longstanding constitutional provision that bars candidates who have voluntarily pledged allegiance to a foreign power. Friday and Bramble have openly acknowledged they hold Canadian citizenship acquired through voluntary naturalization, a status the opposition says violates the nation’s founding charter.

    The two incumbent NDP politicians represent Northern Grenadines and East Kingstown, constituencies the ULP has never won in electoral history. Friday has served as a Member of Parliament since 2001, while Bramble first won his seat in 2020.

    In response, the NDP argues that the constitution only requires parliamentary candidates to hold Commonwealth citizenship—a category that includes Canada—meaning Friday and Bramble’s election is fully legal. NDP Senator Jemalie John told local outlet Hot 97 FM Wednesday that the amendments are merely intended to clear up existing ambiguity in the constitution, not to interfere with the pending court case. “If there were no ambiguity, we would not have this case before the court right now,” John said, noting the central unresolved question is whether Commonwealth nations like Canada qualify as “foreign powers or states” under existing constitutional language.

    According to Gonsalves, the proposed changes target Section 26(5) of the 1979 constitution, which outlines candidacy disqualifications. The amendments would add a formal definition of what constitutes a foreign power, and explicitly remove any reference to allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign state as a disqualifying factor. Most controversially, Gonsalves says the changes would be made retroactive to 1979, when the current constitution first took effect.

    The court has already held an initial case management hearing in March, and has scheduled full legal arguments for July 28 through 30. Gonsalves pointed out that on the same morning as the initial hearing, Friday dismissed the petition as frivolous and a waste of judicial resources—a claim that rings hollow, the opposition leader argues, given the NDP’s push to rewrite the constitution to resolve the politicians’ legal vulnerability.

    “Friday and Bramble, through their lawyers at the case management hearing, agreed that they are Canadian citizens and they have Canadian passports,” Gonsalves said. “The only questions that remain are legal ones, central among which is ‘Is Canada a foreign power or state?’ The second issue was that Friday and Bramble do have an allegiance, obedience and adherence to this foreign power state called Canada.”

    Gonsalves argued that Friday and Bramble’s legal team’s push for the constitutional amendments amounts to an “insurance policy” after their initial argument that Commonwealth nations do not qualify as foreign powers failed to fully resolve their legal risk. He also highlighted a key point of NDP hypocrisy in the fight: a 2009 constitutional reform proposal that included a provision to allow dual citizens to run for office was opposed and ultimately voted down by the public, with the NDP—including Friday himself—leading the campaign against the measure.

    “This is a political battle of massive proportions,” Gonsalves said, adding that the amendments are clearly intended to benefit the ruling party’s sitting leaders. In a dramatic appeal to end what he called the NDP’s “madness,” Gonsalves called on St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ Governor-General to intervene by refusing to grant royal assent to the bills if they pass parliament.

  • Cabinet waives birth certificate fees during voter confirmation process

    Cabinet waives birth certificate fees during voter confirmation process

    In a move aimed at removing barriers to democratic participation, Dominica’s Cabinet has greenlit a temporary elimination of fees for birth certificate issuance, timed to coincide with the island nation’s ongoing voter confirmation process. The policy was formally approved during a Cabinet gathering held on Tuesday, April 14, 2026, according to an official statement released by the Cabinet Secretariat.

    The fee waiver went into effect immediately following the announcement, and will stay in place through October 14, 2026 — matching the scheduled end date of the voter confirmation period. Officials explained that the policy was crafted to address one of the most common logistical barriers for citizens seeking to update or confirm their voting eligibility: access to required foundational identification documents.

    “The entire goal of this initiative is to ensure that every eligible citizen can secure the documentation they need without financial barriers, so they can participate fully in the democratic process,” the statement noted. The Dominican government is actively encouraging all qualifying residents to take advantage of the six-month waiver to secure or replace their birth certificates and solidify their standing on voter rolls.

    For convenience, the government has offered two accessible pathways for citizens to request their birth certificates. Eligible individuals can submit applications via the country’s official government online portal, for contactless processing from anywhere in the country. Alternatively, applicants can choose to visit the in-person Registry Division, housed on Dame Eugenia Charles Boulevard in the capital city of Roseau, to submit their request directly to staff.

    This policy comes as part of broader efforts by the Dominican administration to expand access to voting and streamline voter list maintenance ahead of upcoming electoral processes, removing unnecessary financial hurdles that have historically discouraged low-income and marginalized citizens from completing their voter confirmation.

  • Proposed change to law will not affect election cases – senator

    Proposed change to law will not affect election cases – senator

    A looming constitutional debate in St. Vincent and the Grenadines has sparked political friction between the ruling New Democratic Party (NDP) and the opposition Unity Labour Party (ULP), with a sitting government senator pushing back against opposition claims that the proposed clarification of the nation’s constitution is an underhanded, last-minute power grab.

    The core of the political dispute centers on two pending election petitions filed by the ULP, which challenge the eligibility of sitting Prime Minister Godwin Friday and Foreign Minister Dwight Fitzgerald Bramble to retain their seats won in the November 2025 general election. The ULP has argued that the pair violated constitutional requirements for parliamentary candidates by holding citizenship of a foreign power, a charge that stems from longstanding ambiguity around how the constitution defines the term “foreign power”.

    Government Senator Jemalie John, a practicing lawyer, laid out the administration’s position during an interview with Hot 97 FM on Wednesday, emphasizing that the planned parliamentary action to clarify the constitutional language will have no impact on the pending court proceedings. John stressed that the two petitions remain fully active before the judiciary, and even if the amendment includes a retroactivity clause, it will ultimately fall to the courts to decide whether the new language applies to the ongoing case, leaving the opposition fully free to pursue their legal challenge.

    John rejected opposition claims that the NDP rushed the amendment through without public transparency, noting that the plan became public through standard parliamentary procedure: the official Order Paper for the upcoming April 21 parliamentary sitting was circulated to all legislators one week in advance, as required by law, making the planned debate a matter of public record from that point.

    He framed the ULP’s objections as a political power play, noting that the NDP secured a landslide 14-1 victory over the ULP in the November election, ending 25 years of ULP rule. The opposition’s end goal, John argued, is to overturn the results of two constituencies where voters overwhelmingly reelected Friday (to a sixth consecutive term) and Bramble (to a second five-year term) and install the defeated ULP candidates in their place. “Their mission is to have our prime minister and our foreign minister replaced with Carlos Williams and Luke Browne,” John stated, pointing out that the ULP has never won either of the two seats in its entire political history. “They essentially want to impose someone on the people that the people never voted for. Ethically and morally, they are wrong.”

    Addressing claims that the amendment is a self-serving measure, John countered that the move is designed to protect St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ democratic process. “If the people went out in an election and voted for a particular candidate, how could it be ethically, morally or legally right that the votes of thousands of Vincentians should be disregarded, thrown away, and there’s somebody then sitting in Parliament represent them who they never voted for in the first place?” he asked. “Ensuring that that democratic right is protected, it could never be appropriately described as self-serving. If anything, it protects the right of the Vincentian people and protects a democratic franchise.”

    On the substance of the amendment, John clarified that the proposal does not rewrite the constitution entirely, but only resolves existing ambiguity that directly led to the court case being filed. The key point of contention is how to define a “foreign power”: some interpretations hold that any dual citizenship, even with another Commonwealth nation, disqualifies a candidate, while others argue that Commonwealth countries do not count as foreign powers under the constitution. John noted that proponents of the latter interpretation often cite a landmark case from St. Kitts and Nevis, but St. Kitts’ constitution is explicitly different from St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ charter, making a direct application of that ruling inappropriate.

    John also reaffirmed the separation of powers between the legislative and judicial branches, arguing that when constitutional ambiguity exists, it is the role of parliament – not the courts – to clarify the law. “The court is not there to make laws. The court is not there to change laws or to repeal laws. That rests with the parliament. The court is there to interpret the laws that parliament passes,” he explained. “If the role and function of the Parliament is to make, change and repeal laws, then we should not say, ‘Oh, well, let the judges do it.’ Parliament is the law-making body of St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and it will continue to act on that responsibility to clarify policy that serves the public good.”

    John added that the core policy question at hand is whether native-born Vincentians who acquire a second citizenship, including through marriage, should be barred from serving in parliament, a question he said will be fully debated during the April 21 parliamentary session.

    The pending election petitions have already gone through a case management hearing in early March, with the next procedural hearing scheduled for May 19. The trial for the two challenges is set to begin on July 28, with three days allocated for proceedings.

  • UPP highlights concerns over IMF report on Dominica’s economic outlook

    UPP highlights concerns over IMF report on Dominica’s economic outlook

    The International Monetary Fund’s 2026 Article IV Mission Report on the Commonwealth of Dominica has sparked intense political scrutiny from the island nation’s main opposition bloc, the United Progressive Party (UPP), led by attorney Joshua Francis. The UPP has raised sharp alarms over the report’s findings, which paint a mixed picture of Dominica’s economic trajectory and highlight deep structural vulnerabilities that the party argues have been left unaddressed by the long-ruling Dominica Labour Party.

    According to the IMF’s analysis, Dominica delivered a solid 4.5% GDP growth rate in 2025, a figure that reflects short-term expansion following recent global and regional economic disruptions. But the fund’s medium-term outlook is far from encouraging: projections show growth will slow to a range of 2% to 3% in coming years, with overall economic risks explicitly “tilted to the downside.”

    One of the most pressing issues flagged in the report is Dominica’s extreme current account deficit, which the IMF estimates has reached 38% of total GDP. This gap underscores the country’s persistent heavy dependence on imported goods and services, a structural imbalance the UPP says the current administration has failed to correct. Even more concerning for the opposition is Dominica’s public debt load, which sits at roughly 103% of GDP — far higher than standard regional benchmarks, placing the island at high risk of sovereign debt distress. The IMF’s recommendation of an additional EC$60 million in fiscal consolidation further confirms the ongoing fiscal pressure squeezing the national budget, the UPP notes.

    The report also draws attention to weaknesses in Dominica’s financial sector. Non-performing loans remain at elevated levels, and regulatory oversight has not kept pace with the rapid growth of the country’s credit union industry, which now holds more than 50% of all private sector credit in the economy. Additionally, the IMF echoes longstanding questions about Dominica’s heavy reliance on revenue from its Citizenship by Investment (CBI) program, raising concerns about both transparency and long-term fiscal sustainability. For the UPP, this overreliance is clear proof that the ruling Labour Party has neglected to build a diversified, shock-resilient national economy.

    Institutional weaknesses round out the list of risk factors: the IMF highlights gaps in public financial management systems and limited fiscal transparency, both of which the UPP says contribute to the country’s overall economic fragility. In a formal statement following the report’s release, UPP leader Joshua Francis emphasized that the IMF’s findings validate the opposition’s longstanding warnings. “The IMF report confirms that Dominica’s economy remains fragile and exposed,” Francis said. “We need responsible leadership, stronger governance, and a clear path toward sustainable economic growth.”

    The UPP has laid out its policy vision, calling for urgent nationwide reforms to cut public debt, generate new private sector jobs, expand economic diversification, tighten financial sector oversight, and improve government transparency. The party warns that without bold, immediate policy intervention, Dominica will remain trapped in a cycle of slow growth, limiting opportunity for citizens and blocking progress toward long-term economic resilience.

    For its part, the ruling administration has acknowledged the IMF’s conclusions. Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit recently addressed the report’s findings during a parliamentary session, noting that the government respects the fund’s conclusions and has outlined its own official position on the issues raised to provide contextual perspective for lawmakers and the public.

  • Greene Tells St. Paul’s Constituents to ‘Judge Me by the Work’ as He Seeks Re-Election

    Greene Tells St. Paul’s Constituents to ‘Judge Me by the Work’ as He Seeks Re-Election

    As campaign season kicks into high gear for congressional seats across the United States, incumbent Representative Greene is making his case to voters in St. Paul, urging constituents to base their November voting decisions on his tangible policy achievements over his current term rather than outside noise or partisan rhetoric.

    In a series of recent community meetings and public addresses hosted across the district’s diverse neighborhoods, from downtown St. Paul business districts to suburban residential blocks, Greene directly addressed questions about his record and encouraged voters to hold him accountable for the work he has delivered since taking office.

    “I don’t ask anyone to support me based on party labels or empty campaign promises,” Greene told a packed gathering of local residents last week. “What I ask is simple: judge me by the work I have done for this community, the progress we have delivered together, and the plans I have to move St. Paul forward over the next term.”

    Over his current tenure, Greene has prioritized legislation focused on expanding access to affordable healthcare for low-income constituents, securing federal funding for local infrastructure upgrades—including road repairs and public transit improvements—and pushing for stronger funding for St. Paul’s public K-12 school systems. He has also positioned himself as a key advocate for small businesses in the district, backing tax relief packages and grant programs designed to help local establishments recover from recent economic headwinds.

    His re-election bid comes as control of Congress hangs in the balance, with competitive races across the country expected to determine which party sets the legislative agenda in Washington for the next two years. The St. Paul district has long been viewed as a competitive seat, with national party committees already pouring resources into both the Greene campaign and that of his challenger. For his part, Greene has centered his campaign on local issues rather than national partisan fights, a strategy designed to resonate with independent voters who make up a sizable share of the district’s electorate.

    Local voter reaction has been mixed so far: long-time supporters have praised Greene’s focus on constituent services and his consistent presence in the district, while some undecided voters note they are still weighing his record against the policy proposals put forward by his opponent. Regardless, Greene’s call for performance-based evaluation represents a common tactic for incumbents seeking to turn their time in office into a key electoral advantage, framing the race as a choice between proven results and untested opposition.