In a key diplomatic milestone for bilateral ties between the two South American and Caribbean nations, Georgette Garcia-Elias, the newly appointed Surinamese ambassador to Venezuela, has formally presented her copy of credentials to Venezuela’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, marking a critical step forward in strengthening diplomatic and economic partnership between the two countries.
Garcia-Elias, who was officially sworn in to the post of Suriname’s ambassador to Caracas back in March 2026, completed this formal procedure that clears the way for her to fully carry out her diplomatic duties across the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. During the closed-door meeting following the credential presentation, the new ambassador emphasized Suriname’s firm commitment to deepening the long-standing bilateral relationship between the two neighbors.
She specifically highlighted the shared strategic vision that both nations hold: to preserve the Caribbean region as a zone defined by lasting peace and cross-border collaborative development. Beyond overarching diplomatic goals, Garcia-Elias also put forward a concrete proposal to establish a joint bilateral commission focused on advancing cooperation across a range of high-priority strategic sectors. These sectors include agriculture, fisheries, commercial air connectivity, higher education, public health care, and energy.
According to the ambassador, each of these areas presents tangible, actionable opportunities to expand mutual collaboration and drive inclusive socio-economic development for both nations. Responding to Garcia-Elias’s remarks, Venezuela’s Foreign Minister Yván Gil Pinto extended his formal congratulations to the Surinamese diplomat on her recent appointment. He reaffirmed Venezuela’s full readiness to create all necessary enabling conditions for Garcia-Elias to carry out her diplomatic work effectively and efficiently, while also underlining Venezuela’s commitment to advancing deeper cooperation across diplomatic, economic, and cultural domains.
分类: politics
-

Georgette Garcia-Elias begint diplomatieke missie in Venezuela
-

Suriname en Dominicaanse Republiek versterken banden
In a significant step to deepen cross-national ties, Suriname and the Dominican Republic have locked in concrete agreements to expand collaboration across a range of key strategic sectors, following high-level bilateral diplomatic talks held in the Dominican capital of Santo Domingo. The discussions were led by Suriname’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, International Trade and Cooperation Melvin Bouva, who met with his Dominican counterpart Roberto Álvarez on Wednesday. Bouva was joined on the working visit by Raymond Landveld, Suriname’s Minister of Transport, Communication and Tourism.
The two sides centered talks on strengthening long-standing diplomatic relations and unlocking new mutual economic and social benefits through targeted cooperation across priority sectors. These areas span tourism, education, trade, direct investment, agriculture, transport connectivity, climate action and sustainable energy development.
During the negotiations, Bouva highlighted the emerging opportunities created by Suriname’s growing oil and gas sector, noting that the expanding industry opens new pathways for joint economic collaboration and cross-border infrastructure development that can benefit both nations. The ministers also pointed out the natural complementarity of the two countries’ tourism industries, a sector that has rebounded strongly globally post-pandemic and offers immediate gains for shared growth.
Beyond bilateral initiatives, the two leaders emphasized the critical importance of aligned cooperation within regional and international multilateral frameworks, particularly as the world grapples with interconnected global challenges including economic volatility, climate change, and uneven development. Talks also covered a range of shared priority issues: sustainable development, national food security, job creation, and global poverty reduction, all of which were addressed in depth during the formal sessions.
The diplomatic meeting concluded with the signing of a binding Joint Communiqué, which formally codifies all key agreements and shared intentions for advancing future cooperation between the two Caribbean nations. Beyond the official governmental talks, Bouva held a series of working meetings with representatives from the Dominican private sector, regulatory authorities across tourism, trade, energy and transport, and leaders from ProDominicana, the country’s national investment promotion agency. The agency will partner with the Suriname Investment and Trade Agency to drive forward next steps, with a shared goal of stimulating increased two-way investment and expanding business-to-business connections between enterprises from both countries.
The visit also laid critical groundwork for an upcoming official visit to the Dominican Republic by Jennifer Simons, President of the National Assembly of Suriname. Bouva concluded his visit and departed for Suriname on Thursday 16 April, traveling on the inaugural flight of Sky High Dominicana, a new air service that will launch a weekly direct flight route connecting Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, to Paramaribo, Suriname. The new air link is expected to boost tourism, business travel and people-to-people connections between the two nations immediately.
-

Who’s Filing and Who’s Not?
Less than two months after the annual legal deadline for Belize’s public officials to submit financial disclosure declarations, transparency and accountability in government has returned to the center of public debate, driven by a social media announcement from one of the country’s sitting cabinet ministers.
On Wednesday, Infrastructure Minister Julius Espat — who also serves as the elected representative for Cayo South Constituency — made a public post confirming that he had submitted his 14th annual declaration to the nation’s Integrity Commission. In the announcement, Espat emphasized that open accountability and transparent governance are non-negotiable core values for anyone holding public office, noting that he remains committed to upholding these standards through consistent compliance with disclosure requirements.
“Today I had the honor of submitting my 14th Integrity Commission Report as the representative for the Cayo South Constituency. Transparency and accountability remain at the core of public service, and I am committed to upholding these principles. Grateful for the opportunity to serve,” Espat wrote in his public post.
Espat’s voluntary confirmation of his compliance has sparked renewed public attention to a longstanding requirement for all elected public officials in Belize, and prompted questions about how many other elected representatives have met their legal obligations ahead of the deadline. Under Belizean existing anti-corruption and good governance legislation, all elected members of the national legislature, appointed senators, and municipal councilors at the town and city level are legally mandated to submit annual declarations of personal assets and private financial interests to the Integrity Commission by March 1 of every calendar year. These disclosures are explicitly designed to prevent conflicts of interest, increase government transparency, and reinforce broader good governance practices across all levels of elected office.
In follow-up comments to reporters this week, Henry Charles Usher, Belize’s Minister of Public Service and Disaster Risk Management and the Area Representative for Fort George, confirmed that he has completed all required submissions and met the March 1 deadline without requesting an extension. “I’m up to date and I was on time. The Integrity Commission filings are due on March first of each year, so I was on time. I didn’t have to ask for an extension,” Usher stated.
When pressed to address longstanding public concerns that the Integrity Commission lacks sufficient enforcement authority to compel non-compliant officials to submit their declarations and penalize those who miss the deadline, Usher said that the current legislative framework already includes the tools necessary to hold public officials accountable for meeting this requirement. “I think that the law, the legislation is there to hold public officers to account. Remember this is part of good governance for elected officials to make sure that they produce these filings every year. It has to be done on time,” he added.
A full interview with Usher is set to air on News 5 Live this evening, where further questions about compliance rates and the Integrity Commission’s oversight role are expected to be discussed.
-

Dominica has seized thousands of ammunition and over 160 firearms since 2023, says Blackmoore
At a three-day intergovernmental security roundtable held in early April 2026, Dominica’s Minister for National Security Rayburn Blackmoore has unveiled significant progress in the island nation’s fight against illicit arms trafficking, revealing that local law enforcement has seized more than 160 illegal firearms and nearly 4,000 rounds of ammunition since 2023.
Speaking to attendees on April 8–10 at the event hosted by Dominica’s Ministry of National Security and Legal Affairs, in partnership with the United Nations Regional Centre for Peace, Disarmament and Development in Latin America and the Caribbean (UNLIREC) and the CARICOM Implementation Agency for Crime and Security (CARICOM IMPACS), Blackmoore detailed the results of sustained enforcement operations: between 2023 and the time of the announcement, officers recovered 3,929 rounds of ammunition, 161 unregistered firearms, and took 121 individuals into custody on related charges.
The national security minister extended public recognition to the frontline personnel leading these counter-arms efforts, singling out the Commonwealth of Dominica Police Force and the island’s Customs and Excise Division for their commitment, bravery, and consistent operational excellence. He highlighted that representatives from these agencies were in attendance at the roundtable to coordinate next steps for regional and local security cooperation.
Blackmoore emphasized that eliminating the threat of illegal weapons, which he described as a fundamental danger to Dominica’s social stability, cannot be achieved through isolated action. “If we are to realize success in dealing and combating that threat to our civilization, it’s going to require a collective endeavor going forward,” he told the gathering.
The current enforcement push is part of a broader coordinated regional effort to implement the Caribbean Firearms Roadmap, a targeted strategy designed to curb illegal gun trafficking across the Caribbean basin, reduce community violence, and strengthen public safety infrastructure for all member states.
Beyond reviewing progress on anti-trafficking operations, attendees at the inter-institutional roundtable also discussed plans for the construction of a new regulated explosive storage facility in Dominica, a key infrastructure upgrade to improve public safety and weapons management on the island.
-

Inheemse organisatie waarschuwt voor rechtsongelijkheid
On April 16, Het Inheems Kollectief Suriname (IKSur), Suriname’s leading indigenous advocacy organization, issued a blistering rebuke of the starkly divergent sentencing demands put forward by the country’s Public Prosecution Service (OM) in the high-profile Pikin Saron violence case, arguing that the lopsided punishments confirm long-held allegations of unequal treatment under Suriname’s rule of law.
The case traces back to violent unrest that broke out in the Pikin Saron indigenous community on May 2, 2023. During the unrest, two indigenous residents — Martinus Wolfjager and Ivanildo Dijksteel — were killed by responding police officers. Forensic pathology examinations later confirmed that the two men posed no immediate threat to officers and were not attempting to flee when they were shot; both were already on the ground when they were struck by gunfire at close range, confirming the use of excessive, unwarranted force.
Seven police officers are currently on trial for their roles in the deadly incident. On February 3, 2026, the OM submitted a sentencing demand calling for a 12-month suspended prison sentence with a three-year probation period for all seven officers, allowing them to remain free throughout and after the trial. In a stark contrast, just weeks earlier on March 24, 2026, the OM reaffirmed its demand for a 15-year unconditional prison sentence for multiple indigenous defendants in the same case during an appeal hearing, maintaining the original harsh sentencing request from the first trial even after a lower sentence was initially handed down.
IKSur has condemned this disparate treatment as “impossible to reconcile with the core principle of equal justice under law”, describing the lopsided sentencing demands as both “shocking” and “unacceptable”. Beyond the sentencing gap, the organization also raised a series of serious concerns about the investigation and broader trial process. Immediately after the 2023 violence, community leaders called for an independent international forensic pathology investigation to avoid bias, but this request was denied despite accessible international expertise, leaving the probe entirely in the hands of domestic authorities. The trial itself has also shown clear procedural inequalities, IKSur claims: indigenous suspects were arrested swiftly and held in pre-trial detention for extended periods, while the implicated police officers have remained free on bail throughout the entire investigation, which has proceeded at a far slower pace.
Beyond procedural issues, IKSur emphasizes that the entire case fails to address the root causes of the 2023 unrest, focusing narrowly on the violence itself without acknowledging the decades of unaddressed grievances driving indigenous activism in Suriname. For years, indigenous communities have pursued peaceful advocacy to secure legal recognition of their traditional land rights and protection of their ancestral territories. These repeated calls have been consistently ignored by national authorities, the organization says, allowing unregulated logging, gold mining, and agricultural concession operations to continue expanding into traditional indigenous lands — often without the free, prior, and informed consent of local communities. These activities have left severe environmental damage in their wake and created major public health risks for indigenous populations.
“What happened in Pikin Saron was an eruption after years of ignored warnings,” stated IKSur chair Captain Lloyd Read. The organization warned that ongoing systemic disregard for indigenous communities’ legitimate demands, paired with clear dual standards in the justice system, is fueling rising social tensions across Suriname and poses an existential threat to the credibility of the country’s rule of law.
“Without justice, there is no trust. Without trust, there can be no rule of law,” IKSur said in its statement. The organization has issued a public call for greater awareness and urgent collective action from Suriname’s civil society, independent judiciary, and the broader international community to address the inequalities exposed by the Pikin Saron case and advance long-overdue justice for indigenous peoples.
-

US Catholics unsettled by Trump’s feud with pope
A heated public exchange of criticism between former president and 2024 election winner Donald Trump and Pope Leo has stirred significant anger among segments of U.S. Catholics, a critical voting demographic that backed Trump in last year’s presidential race, with many arguing the American leader has crossed a line in his personal attacks on the pontiff.
The conflict between the two leaders has spilled across multiple high-stakes policy areas, from immigration policy to tensions surrounding Iran and the ongoing Middle East war. Most recently, Trump delivered an unprecedented rebuke by labeling the Chicago-born pontiff “weak” — marking the first time a sitting U.S. president has launched such a direct personal attack on a sitting pope. Pope Leo has publicly stated he has a moral obligation to speak out against armed conflict, a stance that has put him directly at odds with Trump’s hawkish foreign policy positions.
Among the most controversial incidents that sparked public outrage was a since-deleted AI-generated image posted by Trump that depicted the former reality TV star and real estate developer in a frame that framed him as a Jesus-like figure. Outside a New York City church Friday, 88-year-old retired classics professor Jim Supp told AFP that Trump’s attempt to question the theological perspective of an ordained priest was “totally ridiculous.” “There are certain things in life not to joke about,” Supp said, echoing broader frustration among Catholic voters who see the post as a disrespectful provocation. For 68-year-old retired advertising executive John O’Brian, the circulation of the image amounted to outright blasphemy for followers of Christianity.
Pope Leo later addressed the risks of unregulated artificial intelligence misuse in the wake of the post, though he stopped short of directly naming Trump in his comments.
For decades, sitting U.S. presidents have intentionally avoided openly criticizing popes out of respect for the large and politically influential U.S. Catholic electorate. Even as he won the 2024 presidential election with majority support from Catholic voters, Trump has abandoned this longstanding norm, launching blunt public attacks that have created new political vulnerabilities for the Republican Party ahead of November’s upcoming midterm elections — even among the party’s more conservative Catholic base.
Anthony Clark, a 26-year-old policy fellow at an anti-abortion organization who describes Trump as a “very good president” with strong policy intentions, acknowledged that the commander-in-chief often acts imprudently when discussing sensitive, divisive topics. “But I think that intentions aren’t everything, and I think he can be imprudent at times in what he says or in the way that he approaches especially controversial topics,” Clark told AFP outside a Catholic basilica in Washington D.C.
While popes have traditionally steered clear of overt involvement in U.S. domestic partisan politics, Pope Leo’s willingness to stand his ground against Trump has earned him admiration from some Catholic voters. “I’m really glad that Pope Leo stood his ground when he said he’s not afraid of the administration,” 22-year-old Carolina Herrera said in Washington. “You should not mess with the pope, no matter what, don’t mess with him.”
Though Trump was raised Presbyterian, has been married three times, and rarely attends formal religious services, he has closely aligned himself with the Christian conservative movement since entering politics. Christian right leaders have openly praised Trump for delivering their top policy priority: rolling back the nationwide constitutional right to abortion, a change made possible by the three Supreme Court justices he appointed during his first term in office.
Even in deep-red Texas, a Republican stronghold where Christian conservatism dominates state politics, reactions to the public feud remain divided. At a midday mass in Houston, some attendees criticized both leaders for their public confrontation. “I don’t think either of them are acting the way they should be acting,” said Ann, a 72-year-old white woman who declined to share her last name. She added that the pope has been “very harsh on America,” arguing that Jesus’s teachings did not bar national leaders from protecting their citizens and sovereign borders.
For 67-year-old Latino Houston resident Manuel, the top priority remains ending the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, and he called for both leaders to set aside their differences. “Because right now, this is mainly about peace. We need peace in the Middle East,” he said.
-

Rolle defends his eligibility after Bain questions WSC job
A public dispute over candidate eligibility has erupted on Bahamas’ Nomination Day, as Free National Movement’s Pinewood constituency hopeful Denarii Rolle pushed back against formal questions about his compliance with electoral law raised by Coalition of Independents leader Lincoln Bain. Bain’s challenge centered on Rolle’s ongoing ties to the Water and Sewerage Corporation, a quasi-public national agency. Under Bahamian electoral rules, any person holding public or quasi-public office is required to resign their position before standing for election, and Bain argued that even contracted employees must disclose their employment status publicly no later than one month prior to the nomination period. “We have to make sure we do things by the book,” Bain stated during the Nomination Day proceedings, emphasizing the need for full adherence to electoral regulations to preserve the integrity of the race. In a direct response to the allegations, Rolle firmly rejected Bain’s claims, clarifying his current employment status meets all legal requirements for candidacy. Rolle confirmed he did previously hold a position at the Water and Sewerage Corporation, but confirmed he is currently on unpaid administrative political leave, and has not drawn a salary from the agency since the start of the campaign period. He pointed to the existing industrial agreement covering Water and Sewerage Corporation employees to back up his status, noting that the contract explicitly allows for unpaid leave for employees running for public office. The agreement also lays out clear post-election terms: if Rolle fails to win the Pinewood seat, he will have 30 days after election results are finalized to decide whether he will return to his former position at the agency. “I’ve already spoken to this on the record,” Rolle told reporters. “He can check our industrial agreement that speaks to the political leave that I’m off, I’m unpaid, so I’m not getting a salary from Water and Sewerage.” The incumbent Pinewood seat, held by the ruling Progressive Liberal Party, has drawn three candidates in the upcoming election, but sitting representative and PLP candidate Myles Laroda has declined to enter the fray over Rolle’s eligibility. Laroda told reporters his sole focus remains on building out his own campaign and connecting with constituents, rather than engaging in inter-candidate disputes over eligibility rules. “Mr Bain raised the issue,” Laroda said. “I have no comment on the other side, I’m just here to worry about the Progressive Liberal Party.” The eligibility challenge comes as Bahamian political parties finalize their slates of candidates ahead of the general election, with transparency around candidate qualifications emerging as a key talking point for smaller opposition groups seeking to shake up the country’s two-party dominated political landscape.
-

Teachers secure 16.5 percent pay raise in new contract
After months of negotiations and following the expiration of the previous collective bargaining agreement in 2025, the Bahamian government has finalized a groundbreaking five-year industrial pact with the Bahamas Educators, Counsellors and Allied Workers Union (BECAWU), delivering targeted financial gains and expanded protections for the union’s 850 members working across the country’s education system. While the total projected cost of the agreement, which will remain in effect through 2030, has not yet been released to the public — with government officials noting the Ministry of Finance must complete a full audit before the final figure can be confirmed — both union and government leaders have framed the deal as a balanced win for educators and national fiscal health.

