分类: politics

  • Gun courts alone won’t stop illegal firearms – senator

    Gun courts alone won’t stop illegal firearms – senator

    During Wednesday’s upper house parliamentary debate on a bill to amend the Supreme Court of Judicature Act, which would establish a specialized gun court in Barbados, opposition Senator Karina Goodridge issued a pointed call to reframe the nation’s approach to rising gun-related violence. While Goodridge, leader of the Friends of Democracy party, did not oppose the creation of the new firearm court division, she argued that the measure only addresses harms after crimes have been committed, failing to tackle the root of the problem: the steady flow of illegal weapons into the country.

    Goodridge emphasized that the island’s first line of defense against gun violence should not be the courtroom, but strengthened upstream controls that stop illegal firearms from reaching Barbadian communities in the first place. “Firearm court deals with the consequences of gun crime. It does not prevent a single illegal firearm from entering Barbados, and we must make that clear,” she told legislators. “It does not disrupt a single trafficking network. So the first line of defence against illegal firearms, in my view, may not be the courtroom.”

    The senator pushed for urgent investment in enhanced border security, pressing the government to answer critical unaddressed questions about how illegal guns are infiltrating the country’s borders. She called for additional resources and funding to be allocated to frontline agencies tasked with intercepting contraband, including Customs, Immigration, the Barbados Coast Guard, and national law enforcement units. Beyond border infrastructure, Goodridge also raised proactive concerns about the risk of institutional corruption undermining gun interdiction efforts. While she stressed that she has no concrete evidence of existing police corruption tied to gun trafficking, she argued that the government must put robust safeguards in place to prevent corrupt actors from facilitating the flow of illegal weapons.

    In addition to her call for a policy shift toward root-cause interventions, Goodridge flagged structural gaps that could weaken the effectiveness of the proposed gun court even if the bill passes. She noted that adequate staffing is not enough to run a modern, efficient judicial institution; outdated technology infrastructure across the Supreme Court has long been a source of complaint from judges, bar association members, and litigants alike. Goodridge recounted multiple instances of judicial officers reporting malfunctioning recording equipment and outdated digital systems that slow case proceedings and create administrative backlogs. To ensure the new gun court can deliver timely, consistent justice, she urged the government to prioritize upgrading the court’s technological infrastructure before the division launches. Goodridge also recommended that policymakers explore adopting the online court model used successfully in other jurisdictions to improve access and efficiency for gun-related cases.

    The debate over the gun court bill comes as Barbados grapples with persistent gun crime, prompting competing visions for how to reduce violence: one focused on expediting prosecutions and sentencing through specialized courts, and the other advanced by Goodridge that prioritizes cutting off the supply of illegal weapons at the source.

  • Brede steun in De Nationale Assemblee voor verhoging AOV-uitkering

    Brede steun in De Nationale Assemblee voor verhoging AOV-uitkering

    During ongoing parliamentary deliberations over the 2026 draft national budget in Suriname, lawmakers from multiple political factions have united behind a urgent call to raise the country’s universal old-age pension, the Algemene Oudedagsvoorziening (AOV), arguing that the current benefit level leaves thousands of elderly residents unable to cover basic living costs. The debate has also brought renewed scrutiny of ongoing irregularities linked to the country’s purchasing power support grant (KKV), with parliament demanding official clarity from the government on an active investigation into mismanagement of the program.

    Harriët Ramdien, a member of parliament from the ruling VHP party, laid out the stark economic reality facing pensioners during the session. Ramdien noted that Suriname’s official poverty threshold already surpassed 7,000 Surinamese dollars (SRD) in 2025, yet elderly residents who rely solely on state support receive a combined total of just 5,000 SRD per month from the AOV and KKV grants combined. She urged the government to immediately raise the base AOV benefit to a minimum of 7,000 SRD, with additional incremental increases planned once public finances allow for further expansion of social spending.

    Jerrel Pawiroredjo, leader of the opposition NPS faction, threw his full weight behind the proposal, emphasizing that elderly Surinamese rank among the most vulnerable groups in the country. Many can no longer work to generate supplementary income due to age, he explained, leaving them completely dependent on government support. To illustrate the severity of the crisis, Pawiroredjo shared a firsthand anecdote of an elderly woman who waited hours at an ATM for her AOV deposit, only to be unable to afford bus fare home after the transaction went through.

    Raymond Sapoen, a lawmaker from the NDP party, acknowledged that no member of the National Assembly opposes raising social benefit rates, but called for responsible fiscal planning to avoid destabilizing national public finances. Sapoen stressed that the government must outline a clear, achievable timeline for increases not just for AOV, but also for the universal child benefit (AKB) and general social assistance, tying any expansion of spending to verifiable available fiscal space.

    VHP parliamentarian Hakiem Lalmohamed added another layer of concern to the debate, highlighting unannounced cuts to KKV benefits for dozens of residents in the Commewijne district that were implemented without any official explanation. He called on the administration to publicly share the reasoning behind these cuts and immediately restore support to eligible recipients who lost their benefits improperly. Lalmohamed also joined the call for an AOV increase, noting that pre-election pledges had led many elderly Surinamese to expect a monthly benefit of at least 8,000 SRD.

    By the close of the latest budget deliberation, multiple assembly members had formally called on the national government to release a transparent update on the feasibility of increasing AOV and other core social assistance programs, setting the stage for further negotiations as the draft budget moves through the legislative process.

  • Lula waarschuwt Trump: ‘Bemoei je niet met Braziliaanse verkiezingen’

    Lula waarschuwt Trump: ‘Bemoei je niet met Braziliaanse verkiezingen’

    On the sidelines of the G7 summit held in Evian, France, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva issued a clear public warning to the United States, demanding Washington stay out of Brazil’s upcoming presidential election scheduled for October. The rebuke came just hours after Lula held a face-to-face meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump on the summit’s sidelines, bringing long-simmering tensions over foreign influence in Brazil’s democratic process into the global spotlight.

    Lula openly acknowledged the long-standing personal ties between Trump and the Bolsonaro political dynasty, which has emerged as the main opposition to his candidacy this cycle. Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil’s far-right former president, and his family have built close ties with Trump over the years, and his eldest son Flavio Bolsonaro is currently the leading opposition challenger for the presidency in the October vote.

    “He can keep supporting Bolsonaro, the father, the son and the grandson. That is his preference, and I will not interfere in that,” Lula told reporters on the summit sidelines. But the Brazilian president drew an unambiguous line when it comes to U.S. involvement in the election itself: “Do not interfere in Brazil’s elections. This is a Brazilian issue, just as American elections are an American issue.” Lula emphasized that he only asks for basic mutual respect between the two sovereign nations.

    Lula, who is running for a fourth presidential term, currently holds a steady lead in pre-election opinion polling. Flavio Bolsonaro, running on the ticket of the right-wing Liberal Party, is seeking to unseat the incumbent. Trump has already publicly thrown his support behind the Bolsonaro family, and has leveled sharp criticism at Brazil’s judicial system, even going so far as to impose sanctions on sitting justices of Brazil’s Supreme Court.

    In recent months, the Bolsonaro dynasty has faced major legal setbacks. Jair Bolsonaro was convicted last month and sentenced to 27 years in prison for his role in organizing an attempted coup following the 2022 Brazilian presidential election. Another of Jair Bolsonaro’s sons, Eduardo Bolsonaro, was also convicted on charges of improperly influencing the U.S. government to advance his family’s political interests, a charge Eduardo has repeatedly denied.

    During his remarks at the G7 summit, Trump dismissed Brazil as a “rough” and “politically dangerous” country, echoing his previous attacks on the nation’s democratic institutions. Lula pushed back forcefully against these claims, defending the integrity of Brazil’s electronic voting systems, which Trump has repeatedly questioned. In a surprising open challenge, Lula even offered to give Trump a personal demonstration of how the voting systems operate to prove their reliability.

    Lula’s call for non-interference and mutual respect has set the narrative for the upcoming election, which is already under intense international scrutiny due to the well-documented close alignment between Trump and the Bolsonaro clan. The standoff underscores growing global concerns about foreign interference in democratic processes ahead of a series of high-stakes national elections across the world this year.

  • Asabina vraagt regering om opheldering over aangekondigde ontruimingsactie in 21 Bergi

    Asabina vraagt regering om opheldering over aangekondigde ontruimingsactie in 21 Bergi

    A political leader in Suriname has formally called on the national government to share full details with parliament about a planned large-scale eviction operation in a high-risk gold mining region that has already seen deadly accidents in recent years. Ronny Asabina, who leads the BEP political faction, made the demand during ongoing parliamentary budget deliberations on June 18, according to local parliamentary sources. For several days, widespread rumors have circulated that the 21 Bergi mining zone in Suriname’s Matawai region will be completely cleared in a so-called “clean sweep” operation scheduled for Friday. Asabina drew lawmakers’ attention to the grim history of this same site: two years ago, a major gold mining disaster claimed the lives of 15 young Surinamese workers here. Just recently, two more miners were trapped in a landslide at the site, and Asabina confirmed the pair are still alive and currently receiving medical treatment at a local hospital. The BEP leader emphasized that any large, impactful operation of this nature requires public accountability, and the public has a right to know full details through their elected parliamentary representatives. Through the speaker of the National Assembly of Suriname, Asabina formally requested the administration clarify whether the planned eviction is officially approved by the government, and confirm whether the government fully backs the operation. Asabina told lawmakers he has received information that traditional local authorities in the Matawai region support the planned police-led clearing operation. After formal consultations with the Matawai community, the concession area was officially zoned for permitted gold extraction activities. Even so, Asabina stressed the current, unregulated operating conditions at the site pose an immediate life-threatening risk to anyone working there. He also issued a stark warning that rushing a large-scale eviction without proper preparation and public consultation could escalate into violent confrontations between authorities and miners. Repeating his core demand, Asabina called on the government to provide timely, comprehensive updates to parliament before the operation moves forward. Parliamentary budget discussions, during which the request was raised, are scheduled to continue the same day. No immediate response to the demand was reported from government representatives as of the early morning of June 18.

  • “Reality demands urgent and necessary changes”

    “Reality demands urgent and necessary changes”

    HAVANA, June 18, 2026 – Standing at a defining crossroads for the Cuban nation, President Miguel Mario Díaz-Canel Bermúdez, First Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba, laid out an ambitious, urgent agenda of economic and social transformation during the closing address of the party’s Extraordinary Plenary Session. Held at Havana’s Palace of Revolution on June 17, 2026 – the year marking the centennial of revolutionary icon Fidel Castro Ruz’s birth – the speech framed the reforms as a necessary response to decades of escalating pressure from the United States, paired with long-overdue domestic adjustments to lift the Cuban people out of crisis.

    Díaz-Canel opened by anchoring the moment in Cuba’s revolutionary legacy, paying tribute to Army General Raúl Castro Ruz, Hero of the Republic of Cuba, whose lifelong emphasis on party unity and ideological steadfastness has guided the nation through decades of challenge. He painted a stark picture of Cuba’s current context, describing the intensified U.S. economic, commercial and financial blockade as a relentless, genocidal campaign that has inflicted catastrophic harm on daily life across the island. Beyond traditional sanctions, he highlighted the spurious 2021 designation of Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism, sweeping new executive orders that have internationalized the blockade via secondary sanctions, and a coordinated campaign of ideological disinformation spread through social media to erode public trust in the revolution.

    Against a backdrop of shifting global geopolitics marked by rising hegemonic aggression, erosion of multilateralism and growing global tensions, Díaz-Canel emphasized that the bloc’s decades-long punishment has pushed Cuban families to the breaking point: every liter of fuel, every dose of medicine, every staple food item now carries an extreme markup from financial persecution, while widespread energy shortages disrupt every corner of daily life. “Reality demands urgent and necessary changes,” he stressed. “When life for the people becomes so difficult, the primary duty of the Communist Party and the revolutionary government is not to explain the crisis better, but to change whatever needs to be changed to overcome it.”

    The sweeping reform package, months in the making, draws on input from across Cuban society: public consultations on the 2026 Economic and Social Program, contributions from the National Association of Cuban Economists (ANEC), decades of updated policy guidance from previous party congresses, and even studies of socialist construction experiences in China and Vietnam, with artificial intelligence leveraged to evaluate proposals against existing Cuban regulatory frameworks. Díaz-Canel emphasized that the core goal of the changes is not to abandon socialism, but to strengthen it: the transformations will advance social justice, generate new national wealth and distribute that wealth equitably – rejecting abstract egalitarianism in favor of tangible, material progress for all Cubans.

    “Without wealth, there is nothing to distribute; we would be speaking of social justice in the abstract,” he argued. “Either we produce under these conditions, create wealth, and then distribute it with social justice and equity – that is the challenge.”

    To meet that challenge, Díaz-Canel outlined progress across five simultaneous core priorities: macroeconomic stabilization and recovery of foreign revenue, transformation of Cuba’s outdated economic and social model, agricultural sector revitalization, strengthened accounting and cost management, and proactive mitigation of social costs tied to reform.

    Key structural changes include a fundamental reorientation of central planning: instead of micromanaging day-to-day economic activity, the state will focus on building a clear, stable regulatory environment that empowers enterprises and workers to produce efficiently and innovate. State-owned enterprises, which remain the foundational pillar of Cuba’s economy, will gain genuine operational autonomy, with separation of state regulatory functions and business management, and a new “comply or explain” framework to eliminate unnecessary bureaucratic barriers to growth. The National Institute of Business Assets will oversee state assets, hold management accountable for results, and ensure transparency.

    Food security, Díaz-Canel declared, is a matter of national sovereignty: “No one has sovereignty with empty plates.” To end chronic food shortages, Cuba will eliminate all idle arable land, expanding land usufruct rights to individual producers, cooperatives, and micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) while retaining public ownership of land. Any underutilized plot overgrown with invasive marabou will be reallocated to producers willing to put it to work. Farmers will gain direct access to foreign currency to import critical inputs like seeds and fertilizer, and will be able to earn market-aligned prices for their output, turning agricultural work into a path to prosperity rather than hardship.

    On trade and investment, Cuba will eliminate mandatory intermediation for direct imports and exports for both state and non-state enterprises, opening new avenues for productive and export-led growth. The government will pursue targeted debt restructuring, including debt-for-assets swaps that preserve Cuban ownership of strategic assets, as well as debt-for-nature and debt-for-development swaps. The list of activities prohibited to the private sector will be radically overhauled, replacing most outright bans with targeted, responsible regulation, and bureaucratic hurdles for MSME formation and public-private partnerships will be streamlined. Critically, Cuba will open the door to foreign direct investment in domestic private enterprises including MSMEs, with clear rules for ownership, profit repatriation and dispute resolution. Cuban emigrants seeking to invest, donate or launch projects in their homeland will be welcomed with a transparent, stable framework, with no suspicion cast on those who want to contribute to national development.

    Energy, a source of daily crisis for Cuban households, will be another top policy priority. Díaz-Canel framed widespread blackouts not as a technical challenge, but as a humanitarian one: “A power outage is the child who couldn’t study for a test, the food that went bad in the refrigerator, the elderly person who spends the night awake, restless, and sweltering.” To rapidly expand clean energy access, Cuba will eliminate all import tariffs and sales taxes on solar technology, energy storage and efficiency equipment, and cut out intermediaries that drive up costs for consumers. New credit mechanisms will bring solar installations within reach of households, MSMEs, clinics, schools and nursing homes, creating new domestic jobs for Cuban technicians and companies. Major incentives will be offered for electric transportation powered by renewables, with expedited licensing for electric taxis and mobility services, prioritizing investment in tourist hubs, urban centers and productive zones.

    To address the gap between stagnant incomes and rising living costs, Díaz-Canel announced an end to broad, ineffective blanket price caps, which have repeatedly led to shortages and expanded black markets. Instead, the government will shift from product subsidies to direct, targeted support for vulnerable populations, guaranteeing the basic food basket for retirees, families with chronically ill children and low-income households. The country will move progressively to a creditable value-added tax system paired with universal electronic invoicing to eliminate cascading taxation and reduce tax evasion, while the banking system will be thoroughly modernized to reduce bureaucracy, open space for regulated private and foreign financial participation, and streamline transactions ranging from pension payments to remittances to business investment.

    Digital transformation and artificial intelligence will be deployed as cross-cutting tools to boost productivity across every sector, from agriculture to healthcare to tax administration. In the tourism and real estate sectors, new flexible business models will open idle state-owned properties to leasing and development by state, private, cooperative and mixed entities. Wage barriers that push skilled talent out of strategic sectors will be eliminated, allowing variable performance-based pay in both local and foreign currency tied to measurable results.

    Díaz-Canel stressed that all reforms will be implemented gradually, with pilot testing, continuous adjustment, and clear accountability: every measure will have a designated leader, a fixed deadline, and public performance metrics. Decisions that work will be scaled up; those that fail will be corrected immediately; officials unable to meet the demands of the moment will step aside for those who can deliver results.

    Beyond economic reform, Díaz-Canel announced new initiatives to empower young Cubans, launching a national Community Youth Network that will give young people skills, resources and real opportunities to launch projects, revitalize their neighborhoods, create local jobs and build futures in Cuba rather than leaving to seek opportunity abroad.

    Addressing the Cuban people directly, he emphasized that resistance alone is no longer enough: decades of blockade have caused immense suffering, but the country must also address internal barriers including bureaucracy, sluggishness and delayed decisions. “To govern is to solve problems, remove obstacles, provide support, and ensure that decisions translate into real improvements,” he said. “What we intend to set in motion is an emergency economic and social agenda… some will not enjoy unanimous consensus, but they cannot be postponed.”

    Díaz-Canel closed by tying the reform effort to Cuba’s centuries-long struggle for sovereignty, invoking the legacy of Fidel Castro, Raúl Castro and all the revolutionary heroes who led the nation through past crises. On the centennial of Fidel Castro’s birth, he said, the greatest tribute to the revolution’s founders is to preserve its core commitment to social justice while adapting to meet the challenges of the present. “Nothing will be impossible if we embrace the challenge as an opportunity and history as inspiration,” he said. “We are all called to action, and together we will prevail.”

    The address concluded with resounding cheers for a free, sovereign Cuba, and the iconic revolutionary rallying cry: “Socialism or Death! Fatherland or Death! We will prevail!”

  • Local content rent-a-citizen virtually eliminated – natural resources minister

    Local content rent-a-citizen virtually eliminated – natural resources minister

    Guyana’s government has nearly stamped out a pervasive fraudulent scheme that allowed foreign-owned companies to improperly secure local content certification by using Guyanese citizens as front owners to meet majority ownership requirements, according to the country’s top natural resources official.

    Minister of Natural Resources Vickram Bharrat made the announcement Wednesday during a signing ceremony for annual local content plan approval letters, a key milestone in advancing the country’s local content policy. He emphasized that enforcement teams have worked aggressively to crack down on the illegal practice, commonly referred to as “rent-a-citizen”, and send a clear warning to bad actors that violations will not go unpunished.

    “For any entity that even contemplates engaging in this malpractice, they have to know penalties are already outlined in the local content legislation, and we will not hesitate to enforce those penalties,” Bharrat told attendees at the event.

    Beyond targeting the rent-a-citizen scheme, authorities have also dismantled unregulated shell companies that were set up to conceal foreign assets and improperly recruit Guyanese nationals to front for foreign-owned operations, the minister added. He credited the progress to widespread cooperation from the Guyanese public, noting that combined efforts between regulators and local communities have driven the practice to near elimination.

    Guyana first enacted its Local Content Act five years ago, with the core goal of ensuring that domestic workers and businesses capture a greater share of economic benefits from the country’s growing natural resources sector, particularly its booming offshore oil and gas industry. For years, the rent-a-citizen fraud undermined the policy’s intent, prompting repeated government threats to amend the legislation to close loopholes that allowed the malpractice to proliferate. Today’s update marks a significant turning point, showing that strengthened enforcement has delivered results far faster than legislative overhauls.

    The local content certification process requires companies operating in Guyana’s key extractive sectors to demonstrate majority domestic ownership to qualify for certain contracts and benefits. The fraudulent rent-a-citizen scheme allowed foreign firms to bypass these requirements by paying nominal Guyanese owners to put their names on corporate paperwork, leaving actual control and profits in foreign hands.

  • RvC TAS wil CLAD-onderzoek naar financieel beheer; directeur spreekt van verdraaide voorstelling van zaken

    RvC TAS wil CLAD-onderzoek naar financieel beheer; directeur spreekt van verdraaide voorstelling van zaken

    A deepening governance crisis has emerged at Suriname’s Telecommunicatie Autoriteit Suriname (TAS), the nation’s top telecommunications regulator, after its supervisory body, the Raad van Commissarissen (RvC), formally requested a full independent audit of the authority’s financial operations from 2020 to 2025 and launched formal steps to suspend or remove the agency’s sitting director, Wendy Jap-A-Joe. The demands are outlined in an official dated June 15, addressed to Suriname President Jennifer Simons and Minister of Transport, Communication and Tourism Raymond Landveld.

    The RvC justified its extraordinary request by citing persistent, severe concerns over corporate governance, financial stewardship and internal information sharing at TAS. According to the supervisory board, it has faced consistent and structural obstruction in carrying out its legally mandated oversight responsibilities. Specific grievances include prolonged delays in financial reporting, repeated failure to submit complete annual financial statements on schedule, lack of verifiable documentation for key expenditures and decisions, and repeated refusal by leadership to implement formal RvC resolutions. The board argues the situation has become severe enough to require immediate temporary suspension of Director Jap-A-Joe as a precautionary measure while the full investigation proceeds.

    A central focus of the requested probe, which will be carried out by the Centrale Landsaccountantsdienst (CLAD), Suriname’s central state audit service, is compliance with legal requirements mandating that TAS remit any surplus funds to the national government. The RvC says no surplus remittances to the state have been recorded since 2022, even though available financial data shows TAS holds large amounts of liquid capital and fixed-term deposits. To date, the board has found no formal legal authorization allowing TAS to retain or invest these surplus funds instead of transferring them to state coffers.

    Beyond the unremitted surplus, the RvC has called for scrutiny of TAS’s spending on sponsorship activities. The board notes that sponsorship falls outside TAS’s legally defined core mandate, so investigators will need to confirm whether these expenditures had a valid legal basis and were properly accounted for in official financial records.

    Another area flagged for investigation is the deployment of TAS staff to the Office of the Vice President of Suriname between 2021 and 2025. The RvC claims TAS employees carried out work for the vice president’s office for multiple years, with all associated payroll and operational costs covered by the telecom regulator – an arrangement that has no basis in Suriname’s Telecommunications Act, according to the board.

    The audit will also cover the legality and efficiency of TAS spending on international training programs, professional seminars, industry conferences and official overseas travel. Additional areas to be reviewed include all third-party contracts, active projects, bank holdings, fixed-term deposits, annual financial statements, and the completeness and accuracy of TAS’s overall financial administration. The RvC has stipulated that if the CLAD audit or a separate preliminary financial and operational review conducted by the board uncovers evidence of potential criminal activity or integrity violations, relevant law enforcement and oversight bodies must be notified immediately.

    The supervisory board further notes that it had repeatedly requested Jap-A-Joe to provide required financial and governance documentation and cooperate with the preliminary review, but these requests received insufficient response. This lack of cooperation, the board says, has severely hampered its ability to carry out its statutory oversight duties.

    In a direct response to the RvC’s allegations, Director Jap-A-Joe has pushed back against the board’s narrative, telling local outlet Starnieuws that she is deeply disappointed by the content of the formal request. She accused the RvC of misrepresenting facts in its letter, but declined to address the specific accusations in detail ahead of a scheduled meeting with President Simons on the following day. Jap-A-Joe noted that TAS has already sent multiple formal communications to the president, vice president and relevant minister, and will respond fully to the claims during the planned presidential meeting.

    As of the publication of this report, neither President Simons nor Minister Landveld have issued any public comment on the RvC’s request. Under Suriname’s Telecommunications Act, the president holds the authority to appoint, suspend or remove the TAS director, acting on a recommendation from the relevant minister and following formal approval from the Council of Ministers.

  • New Leak Points to $400K Windfall for Company Tied to Minister’s Brother

    New Leak Points to $400K Windfall for Company Tied to Minister’s Brother

    In a developing political scandal unfolding in 2026, newly leaked official documents have uncovered a nearly $400,000 public payout from the Ministry of National Defense to a company tied to the brother of sitting Defense Minister Oscar Mira, raising serious allegations of intentional circumvention of government procurement oversight.

    The leak, first reported by local outlet News Five, adds to a growing cascade of corruption claims targeting the Mira family that have emerged in recent months. Prior to this latest disclosure, unanswered Freedom of Information requests already lingered over hundreds of thousands in public funds directed to another family member, Jenny Mira, while separate scrutiny was already building around a $20,000 monthly contract for staple food supply awarded to Stanley Mira, another of the minister’s siblings.

    The newly surfaced documents shift the controversy from a series of isolated questionable contracts to what critics call a clear pattern of improper public fund distribution. The recipient of the latest payout is MP Farms, an entity registered under the name of Brian Mira, the minister’s third sibling, according to outlet’s investigation by journalist Shane Williams.

    Records show that on September 25, 2025, MP Farms received 44 separate individual payments that add up to $389,796.85 — just shy of the $400,000 mark. What has triggered the most outrage from accountability advocates is the deliberate structure of these transactions: every single invoice was issued for an amount just under the $10,000 threshold that triggers mandatory formal procurement review and higher-level government approval. Further, the 44 invoices are numbered consecutively from 1093 to 1136, with multiple identical amounts repeated across the sequence, including four separate invoices for exactly $9,907.65. This pattern, investigators note, leaves little room for coincidence and strongly suggests intentional structuring to avoid oversight.

    As public pressure builds for a full independent audit, the disclosure has amplified calls for Minister Oscar Mira to answer questions about how multiple members of his immediate family have secured millions in public contracts from the ministry he oversees. Williams’ reporting notes that this latest leak confirms the breadth of financial benefits the Mira family has received through public procurement, deepening the ongoing political controversy.

  • Growing Concern Forces Review of How Defense Contracts Get Approved

    Growing Concern Forces Review of How Defense Contracts Get Approved

    Amid mounting public scrutiny over questionable public spending at Belize’s Ministry of National Defense and Border Security, officials have launched a full internal review of the country’s defense contract approval and payment procedures, following revelations of hundreds of thousands of dollars in payments made to close relatives of a senior government minister.

    The controversy centers on payments issued since 2020 to siblings of current Minister Oscar Mira: Jenny Mira and Brian Mira. The most high-profile transaction saw 44 separate payments totaling nearly $400,000 issued to Brian Mira in a single day in 2025, the year Oscar Mira assumed the top ministerial role. At the time the bulk of the earlier payments to Jenny Mira were processed, current Defense Minister Florencio Marin Junior held the substantive position leading the portfolio.

    In an interview with local media, Marin pushed back against direct responsibility for the unorthodox transactions, emphasizing that the existing approval framework delegates vetting and payment processing to career finance officers and procurement specialists within the government system. “We are guided by the professionals how they do this,” Marin explained in the interview. “And at the ministry, the professionals tell me they process quotations and invoices based on how they are submitted. So we kinda rely on them to guide how the process is paid and well clearly there’s room for improvement and we will continue having the dialogue with finance to hope that we could get it improved.”

    When asked whether ministry leadership had directly engaged with the public officials responsible for processing the payments to identify gaps in oversight, Marin confirmed that preliminary conversations had already occurred, noting that the payment function falls under the oversight of the Ministry of Finance. He added that cross-agency dialogue will continue to revise and strengthen the existing approval process, acknowledging that no system is ever perfect and consistent updates are needed to address vulnerabilities. Marin also defended the value delivered by existing defense contracting, saying “I believe the BDF and the course card have been getting value for money.”

    The internal review, which is now underway, marks the most significant official response to growing public concern over transparency and accountability in defense spending, putting long-standing internal payment protocols under unprecedented institutional scrutiny.

  • Under Fire, Mira Distances Himself from Family Contracts Controversy

    Under Fire, Mira Distances Himself from Family Contracts Controversy

    BELMOPAN, June 17, 2026 — Facing growing public and political backlash over lucrative government contracts awarded to his immediate family members, Belize’s Minister of Home Affairs Oscar Mira has delivered his first public address on the simmering controversy, emphatically distancing himself from any wrongdoing or improper influence over the procurement process.

    News Five reporters caught up with Mira on Wednesday afternoon at a scheduled police awards ceremony in the nation’s capital, where he addressed mounting questions about the multi-faceted scandal that has dominated political discourse in recent days. From the awarding of contracts to leak payment records that have raised new conflict-of-interest red flags, the minister has pushed back against every allegation, arguing he has never held a seat on any government procurement committee and has never attempted to sway procurement decisions made by the Ministry of Finance’s independent bodies.

    “I don’t know if there is an ongoing public criticism, but let me just make clear: as the minister, I sit on no procurement committee. I have never been a member of those procurement groups, which are led exclusively by the Ministry of Finance,” Mira told reporters. “I have no say, I have no influence, and I have never in my ministry, or any other ministry, tried to influence the decision of that committee. They have a job to do, and they have done their job professionally.”

    When pressed to explain how multiple members of his family ended up winning profitable government contracts through the public tender system, Mira framed the process as fully open to any eligible applicant. “Tenders are published in the newspaper. Any interested persons can apply and pay for that tender. They then go through a lengthy evaluation process,” he explained. “I had no say, I was not part of those committees. If they applied and won contracts, they did so on their own, not with my influence or anything to do with me. Everybody who reads the newspaper and wants to be a supplier can go ahead and participate. This is standard process across every government ministry, and I was never part of the decision-making committee.”

    Critics have argued that regardless of formal process, the awarding of contracts to a sitting minister’s close relatives constitutes an obvious conflict of interest. When confronted with that argument, Mira doubled down on his denial of any involvement, noting he was not aware of how many bids were submitted for the contracts in question. “I do not ask nor did I ask anyone who applied. There are many people who applied. That is just one company who applied. I was not a part of it. So I don’t even know how many people applied. It is not me who makes decisions. It is a committee who sits together and makes the decision on who gets contracts. Those are done by buying tender packages and going through the requisite qualifications for what needs to be supplied, and I had nothing to do with that.”

    The controversy has expanded far beyond the initial awarding of contracts, following the leak of screenshots from Belize’s Smart Stream public payment system that have raised new questions about fragmented payment trails to companies linked to Mira’s siblings. When asked if he found any of these transaction details suspicious, Mira again disavowed any connection to how government contractors are paid, maintaining that all payment processes fall under the exclusive purview of the Ministry of Finance.

    Even as public calls for accountability grow louder, Mira characterized the entire ordeal as a “learning experience” for his tenure in office. “I don’t have anything to do with how government pays their contractors or suppliers. I have nothing to do as minister with how the Ministry of Finance handles payments. That is not my decision,” he said. “I really do not know how those payments were structured that way. If you go through the full procurement process, pay for your tender package and all required paperwork, and you are awarded a contract, I think you should be paid for the service you have given. Is there a better way? I believe there is. But that has nothing to do with me as Minister of Home Affairs. I believe every crisis you learn from, and I am trying to make sure I learn from this.”

    The entire scandal traces back to a complaint Mira filed to police against social media commentator Alberto August over critical comments he made online, which ultimately led to August being detained by police overnight. That detention triggered a broader backlash, prompting former Belmopan Area Representative John Saldivar to begin publishing the leaked Smart Stream payment records that have brought the contract controversy into the public spotlight.

    When asked if he regrets filing the initial complaint that opened the door to the current scandal, and whether additional critics could face similar police action, Mira clarified his role in the initial incident. “I did not levy any charges. I did not ask anyone to levy any charges. I am not a policeman, I cannot levy any charge. I did not file a criminal charge either. What I did was I made a complaint as a citizen,” he explained. “I made a complaint because based on legal advice, I felt it was what needed to be done. You don’t try to get cheap political mileage out of a tragedy that impacted the whole community of Belmopan, the medical community, and a grieving family that lost a beloved community member. Those were not my words he attributed to me, so I went to the police department to make that clear. He was afforded the exact same process as any other citizen would be.”

    As for whether he will file additional complaints over the widespread critical and defamatory commentary about the controversy across social media and news outlets, Mira said the matter is now in the hands of his legal team. “I will not discuss that, because I have given all those things to my attorney. My attorney is looking at those, he will advise me on the way forward. Many defamatory statements have been said and reproduced by many news outlets and other people. My attorney is going to give me advice, and that is in his hands now.”

    This report is based on a transcribed broadcast from News Five.