分类: politics

  • Barbadian elected to key Commonwealth law-writing body

    Barbadian elected to key Commonwealth law-writing body

    In a landmark moment for Caribbean legal leadership, Barbadian legal professional Shaquille Newton has secured a historic position on the governing body of the Commonwealth Association of Legislative Counsel (CALC), breaking new ground for small island developing states across the global bloc. Elected earlier this month during CALC’s full conference and general assembly held in Singapore, Newton will serve as the official representative for the Americas region on the association’s leadership council. His election follows closely on the heels of another Caribbean milestone: Jamaican attorney Michelle Daley became the first person from the Caribbean region to be elected president of CALC, marking a unprecedented shift in regional representation at the top of the 42-year-old organization. Together, the pair have cemented the Caribbean’s growing influence in shaping global standards for legislative drafting across the Commonwealth.

    Newton, currently a senior legal advisor with the United Kingdom’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) working on the US-UK criminal justice reform initiative, brings a wealth of hands-on experience to the new role. Prior to joining the FCDO, he served as a parliamentary counsel in Barbados’ Attorney General’s Chambers, where he drafted dozens of key pieces of national legislation and contributed to high-priority law reform projects across the island. The trailblazing attorney emphasized that his historic election is far more than a personal achievement: it opens new doors for small island nations like Barbados to contribute meaningfully to global conversations about the rule of law. As an accredited Commonwealth institution, CALC maintains direct input into key multilateral forums including the Commonwealth Heads of Government Conference, giving Newton and Daley a platform to center the unique legislative challenges faced by small and developing jurisdictions that have long been overlooked by larger, more established members.

    At the core of Newton’s policy agenda is a pressing issue that has plagued Barbados and many other jurisdictions across the Americas: a critical shortage of skilled legislative drafters. He noted that across the global legislative drafting community, there is a well-documented dearth of qualified professionals, making capacity building the top priority of his tenure. “It is my goal, as Americas’ representative, to embark on initiatives to help build capacity in legislative drafting,” Newton shared in an interview with Barbados TODAY. He added that the historic election of two Caribbean leaders to CALC’s top leadership holds broader symbolic meaning for small jurisdictions: for the first time, nations that face unique legislative challenges distinct from larger members like the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada will be at the forefront of guiding the organization’s work, bringing fresh perspectives that better reflect the needs of the Global South.

    Regional legal observers have welcomed the dual milestones, noting that the shift in leadership will elevate the global profile of Caribbean legislative drafting expertise while opening new pathways for cross-regional mentorship and collaborative reform. Founded to foster cooperation and knowledge sharing among legislative counsel across the 56-member Commonwealth bloc, CALC works to uphold rigorous global standards for legislative drafting, expand access to targeted training and mentorship, and support law reform initiatives in developing member states. During his election campaign, Newton centered his platform on strengthening unity among legislative drafters across the Americas, and pledged to expand professional development and mentorship opportunities for early-career drafters — a step he argues is critical to building long-term, sustainable legislative drafting capacity across the entire Commonwealth.

    Following his confirmation as Americas’ representative, Newton expressed gratitude to CALC members for placing their trust in his leadership, and said he is eager to collaborate with President-elect Daley and the full council to deepen cross-regional cooperation across the Americas. He also paid tribute to his early mentors, retired Barbadian Chief Justice Sir David Simmons and Deputy Chief Parliamentary Counsel Shawn Raine Belle, and thanked the team at the British High Commission in Barbados — including High Commissioner Simon Mustard, Deputy High Commissioner Charley Williams, and Criminal Justice Adviser Sirah Abraham — for their ongoing support throughout his campaign and career.

    A decorated legal scholar, Newton was awarded a prestigious Chevening Scholarship in 2021, and holds multiple advanced degrees focused on legislative practice. He earned a Master of Laws with Distinction in Drafting Legislation, Regulation and Policy from the University of London, a Master of Laws in Corporate and Commercial Law from The University of the West Indies, a Bachelor of Laws, and a Legal Education Certificate from the Hugh Wooding Law School, alongside a specialized certificate in law consolidation from the Regional Law Revision Centre in Anguilla. His academic research and writing on legislative drafting and law reform has been published in leading international journals, including CALC’s official publication *The Loophole* and the *European Journal of Law Reform*. During the Singapore conference, Newton presented new research titled *Operationalising Legislative Quality: A Comparative Analysis of the Drafting Conventions of Barbados, the United Kingdom and New Zealand*, which explores how technical drafting approaches directly shape the quality and efficacy of final legislation.

  • Oppositie legt Guyanees parlement stil na veerbootramp

    Oppositie legt Guyanees parlement stil na veerbootramp

    Escalating political tensions have rocked Guyana this week, after opposition lawmakers repeatedly disrupted a National Assembly sitting on Monday to protest the government’s handling of the deadly MV Barima maritime disaster. The opposition bloc is demanding the immediate resignation of Public Works Minister Juan Edghill and former minister Deodat Indar, accusing the incumbent administration of failing to take adequate political responsibility for what has been called the worst maritime tragedy in the country’s recent history.

    Before the parliamentary sitting got underway, opposition politicians and allied activists gathered for a public demonstration outside the National Assembly building. Holding large banners and chanting unified slogans, protesters called for accountability for victims of the disaster and justice for their surviving family members, reiterating their demand that the officials they blame for lax regulatory oversight of the country’s ferry service step down.

    The demonstration spilled directly into the parliamentary chamber once proceedings began. After National Assembly Speaker Manzoor Nadir opened the sitting and a minute’s silence was held to honor the disaster’s victims, opposition lawmakers launched a noisy demonstration, shouting protest slogans and striking their parliamentary desks to disrupt proceedings. The sitting was temporarily suspended as a result of the unrest, before adjournment organizers were able to resume proceedings at a later time.

    Prime Minister Mark Phillips delivered an official update on ongoing search and rescue operations during the sitting, confirming that 30 people remain unaccounted for following the disaster and that search and recovery efforts are continuing at full capacity. Phillips also noted that the administration is moving forward with plans for an independent investigation into the causes of the incident. President Irfaan Ali reaffirmed on Monday that the Guyanese public is entitled to full transparency about what caused the disaster, confirming that an independent inquiry commission will examine whether negligence, operational errors, or other regulatory failures contributed to the tragedy.

    For the opposition, however, the government’s commitment to an independent probe does not go far enough. Opposition leaders are demanding that the inquiry not only operate independently, but also receive a formal mandate approved by a full vote of parliament. They are also pushing for immediate political consequences for the implicated officials before the inquiry’s final report is completed. Despite ongoing disruptions from the opposition, the government’s parliamentary majority pushed ahead with the scheduled legislative agenda. By the end of the sitting, lawmakers approved an additional government spending package totaling 54.9 billion Guyanese dollars. Opposition lawmakers refused to participate in the related debate and continued their protest throughout the vote, meaning the budget proposals passed without any substantive input from the opposition bloc.

    Monday’s events underscore how the MV Barima disaster has quickly evolved from a national human tragedy into a major political flashpoint that threatens to destabilize President Ali’s administration. As search teams continue to comb waterways for missing victims, political pressure on the Ali government is growing steadily, with opponents demanding full accountability for the government’s pre-disaster oversight of the state-owned ferry service and the safety of the country’s public water transport systems.

  • DC Ilahibaks wil achterstanden in Paramaribo Midden wegwerken

    DC Ilahibaks wil achterstanden in Paramaribo Midden wegwerken

    After months of operating out of a shared temporary space, the newly created Paramaribo Midden district commissioner’s office in Suriname has officially moved into its own permanent headquarters, with district chief Ruchsana Ilahibaks announcing that resolving long-standing public complaints and clearing backlogged work will be the office’s top priority in the coming months.

    The Paramaribo Midden district was created in September 2025 as the third administrative district for Suriname’s capital city, joining the previously existing Paramaribo North and Paramaribo South districts. Prior to this relocation, Ilahibaks and her 52-member staff had been working out of the Paramaribo North district commissioner’s office, a arrangement that limited the team’s ability to address the growing volume of public needs across its service area. On Monday, the team officially moved into the new facility, located on the grounds of Openbaar Groen at the intersection of Johannes Mungrastraat and Kernkampweg, made available with support from Stephen Tsang, Minister of Public Works and Spatial Planning.

    Before the facility’s formal opening, Ilahibaks and her staff gathered for a joint prayer, standing hand-in-hand to affirm their commitment to centering community service in all their work. “The community is always welcome here,” Ilahibaks emphasized.

    The new Paramaribo Midden district covers five key resort areas: Welgelegen, Flora, Tammenga, Weg naar Zee and Centrum. It also takes on administrative responsibility for four of the capital’s major markets: the Central Market, Vreedzaam Market, Kwakoe Market and Haitian Market. Ilahibaks noted that the creation of a third district for Paramarame fills a clear, long-unmet public need, as the existing two districts were stretched too thin to address the volume of resident requests and infrastructure concerns across the capital. “There are countless complaints and pending requests, and a huge amount of work remains to be put in order,” she said, confirming that these backlogged cases will move to the top of the new office’s agenda.

    While the office now has its own dedicated physical space, it still lacks all the resources required to fully carry out its mandate. To close this gap, Ilahibaks said the Paramaribo Midden office will maintain close collaboration with the Ministry of Public Works and Spatial Planning, particularly for infrastructure work on tertiary roads and road verges.

    Across Suriname’s 10 national districts, there are now 21 district commissioner positions in total. The largest concentration of posts is in Sipaliwini, which has five district commissioners appointed to serve the district’s large territory and geographically dispersed population.

  • ‘I missed you all’: hugs, kisses as Hadeed returns to work

    ‘I missed you all’: hugs, kisses as Hadeed returns to work

    It was an emotional homecoming for Dominic Hadeed, executive chairman of Blue Waters Products Ltd, on Tuesday, as he stepped through the doors of the company’s Tacarigua headquarters for the first time since being freed from state custody. The 52-year-old business leader was greeted by a workplace prepared to celebrate his return: cheery blue balloons lined sections of the Orange Grove Road compound, and dozens of employees gathered to meet him with warm applause, tight hugs, and firm handshakes.

    As Hadeed made his way through the facility, stopping to embrace every member of staff individually, he offered a simple, heartfelt message to the team that had stood by him during his weeks away: “I missed you all.” Many workers were moved to tears during the reunion, with several kissing and hugging their returning employer. Hadeed in turn thanked his team for their unwavering support throughout his detention.

    Hadeed’s return comes just days after he and his 42-year-old wife Genevieve were released from almost a month of preventive detention held under national state of emergency rules. The couple were taken into custody on June 24, when police executed search warrants across their properties as part of a probe into an alleged conspiracy to assassinate Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar and other high-ranking government officials. To date, no criminal charges have ever been filed against either Dominic or Genevieve Hadeed.

    Their detention sparked a drawn-out series of legal battles that worked its way through Trinidad and Tobago’s court system, starting at the High Court, moving to the Court of Appeal, and ultimately reaching the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, the country’s highest court of appeal for constitutional and criminal matters.

    Last Thursday, Homeland Security Minister Roger Alexander formally revoked the Preventive Detention Orders that had kept the couple in custody. In his announcement, Alexander cited three key factors for the decision: formal recommendations from the independent State of Emergency Review Tribunal, pressing medical considerations related to Hadeed’s health, and an assessment that continued detention while the state’s appeal against an earlier ruling favoring the Hadeeds remained pending was disproportionate.

    The case has drawn significant public attention over the use of preventive detention powers granted under the current state of emergency, with legal advocates highlighting the lack of charges brought against the couple after 30 days in custody.

  • T&T STILL VULNERABLE

    T&T STILL VULNERABLE

    As Trinidad and Tobago paused this week to commemorate the 36th anniversary of the 1990 attempted coup, a fiery exchange has erupted over the current administration’s handling of critical national security infrastructure, with a former top security official accusing the sitting homeland security minister of misappropriating a landmark intelligence facility.

    Gary Griffith, who previously led the Ministry of National Security, used a public Facebook post to anchor his criticism in the firsthand lessons he learned during the 1990 uprising. As one of the youngest active-duty soldiers deployed during the crisis, Griffith saw firsthand the systemic failures that allowed the coup attempt to catch state authorities off guard: within the first 48 hours of the insurgency, dozens of law enforcement officials abandoned their posts, leaving frontline personnel to defend critical state infrastructure without support or coordination.

    In the aftermath of the failed coup, a government-appointed Commission of Enquiry was convened to unpack what went wrong. The commission ultimately identified deep structural flaws in national security operations and laid out 34 concrete recommendations designed to prevent a similar crisis from unfolding again. Griffith argues that for more than a decade after the commission released its findings, successive governments largely ignored the report entirely—a failure he says is only possible in a state with weak democratic accountability, what he calls a “banana republic.”

    During his own tenure leading the national security ministry, Griffith prioritized implementing the commission’s recommendations, carrying out 13 of the 34 proposals before leaving office. The flagship recommendation from the commission was the creation of a dedicated National Operations Centre (NOC), a step directly prompted by the 1990 failure of separate intelligence agencies to share critical threat information with one another.

    Griffith explained that this intelligence sharing gap left law enforcement completely unprepared for the 1990 insurgency: with no coordinated predictive intelligence, the state was forced into reactive damage control rather than launching a pre-emptive strike to stop the uprising before it began. Built at a cost of $500 million, the NOC Griffith established was designed as a cutting-edge, high-technology hub that would enable real-time intelligence gathering and cross-agency collaboration. Its core mandate was to bring all branches of the national intelligence community together to aggregate, analyze, and act on threat information, stopping national security risks before they escalated into crisis.

    During Griffith’s time in office, the NOC delivered tangible results, he says: in 2014, Trinidad and Tobago recorded the largest single drop in serious crime in 31 years, a reduction achieved without implementing a disruptive national state of emergency.

    Today, however, Griffith accuses the current administration and its Homeland Security Minister Roger Alexander of fundamentally altering the NOC’s core mandate, stripping it of its critical intelligence role and reducing it to a basic police dispatch center that duplicates the work already done by the existing E 999 emergency dispatch service. “Sadly, the present administration, through a Minister of Homeland Security whose knowledge is limited primarily to policing, has reduced this highly advanced system to a dispatch centre working alongside E 999, even though E 999 already has its own dispatch centre,” Griffith said. “The National Operations Centre was not built to duplicate E 999.”

    Griffith’s final warning is stark: the failure to fully implement all 34 of the 1990 Commission of Enquiry’s recommendations, paired with the gutting of the NOC’s intelligence function, has left Trinidad and Tobago just as vulnerable to a major security crisis as it was three and a half decades ago. “Poor intelligence gathering was the principal weakness in 1990,” he noted. “The failure to implement the remaining recommendations of the Commission of Enquiry, combined with the failure to utilise the National Operations Centre as intended, has left this country exposed. Thirty-six years later, we are not one step closer to ensuring that what happened in 1990 will never happen again.”

  • Column; Gouddossier 6: Niet de wetten ontbreken, maar politieke moed

    Column; Gouddossier 6: Niet de wetten ontbreken, maar politieke moed

    For decades, Suriname has grappled with a persistent, well-documented crisis in its gold mining industry that has yet to see meaningful resolution. The scope of the problem is no secret to policymakers, regulators, and the public alike:
    Authorities know exactly where unregulated, illegal gold extraction operations are located across the country. They are fully aware that artisanal and illegal mining has poisoned rivers with toxic mercury, cleared vast swathes of old-growth forest, and encroached on protected natural reserves that are critical to biodiversity conservation. They can calculate with reasonable accuracy the hundreds of millions in lost state revenue that illegal mining siphons away from national budgets every year. They also acknowledge the rampant human rights abuses plaguing informal mining camps, including child labor, systemic worker exploitation, and human trafficking.

    Yet despite decades of public discussion, official commissions, draft reform plans, and repeated promises of new enforcement measures, almost no tangible progress has been made to fix the broken sector. This is the defining paradox of Suriname’s gold industry: the problems are not hidden, they have been widely recognized and discussed for generations, but action has consistently failed to follow recognition.

    Even political leaders now openly admit that the barrier to reform is not a lack of solutions or regulatory tools. Ronny Asabina, chair of the Basic Party for Renewal and Democracy (BEP), correctly points out that the national government already possesses all the necessary legislation and legal authority to bring the sector under effective regulation. The failure, he argues, lies not in weak rules, but in weak enforcement of existing laws.

    In a notable, high-stakes remark during parliamentary budget debates, Natural Resources Minister David Abiamofo pulled back the curtain on the root of this enforcement failure, revealing that top political figures from every major party hold direct or indirect financial stakes in the mining sector. This revelation cuts to the heart of the crisis: when influential leaders across the political spectrum have personal financial interests in the very industry the government is tasked with regulating, serious questions about the independence and effectiveness of any policy reform become unavoidable. This is not an unfounded accusation—it is an open reality that demands full, unflinching transparency from the country’s political class.

    While political leaders delay action, the damage of inaction continues to pile up across the country. Ecological destruction grows more visible by the day: illegal mining operations continue to operate unimpeded along the Marowijne River, which forms the border between Suriname and French Guiana. A 2021 border protocol aimed at curbing cross-border illegal activity has sat unratified for years, though Suriname’s parliament, the National Assembly (DNA), is finally set to revisit the agreement this week.

    Recent observations from National Assembly President Jennifer Simons further highlight the deep flaws in the current regulatory framework. Simons noted that nearly 40 companies hold active gold mining concessions, yet only a tiny fraction of these permit holders actually export gold legally. This fact alone demands a fundamental reckoning with how the country’s permitting system works, raising urgent unanswered questions: What is the true scale of gold smuggling out of Suriname? How much tax revenue does the state forfeit each year to unregulated extraction? How many concessions are actually put to active mining use, and how many exist only as tradable assets for speculative profit? Most critically, how much of the wealth extracted from Suriname’s soil actually benefits the broader Surinamese public?

    These are not simple questions to answer, but they must be addressed to build a sustainable, transparent gold sector that serves the national interest. This debate has long outgrown being just about gold: it is now a test of governance, government credibility, and commitment to transparency. Ultimately, it is a test of whether Suriname’s rule of law can consistently enforce its own regulations, regardless of who holds influence. The stakes extend far beyond ecology: unregulated mining is a disaster for public health, erodes the quality of life for indigenous and local communities in the interior, and undermines the country’s already strained public finances.

    No one can claim that Suriname’s authorities do not know what needs to be done to fix the sector. But for decades, a stubborn gap has persisted between acknowledging the problem and implementing solutions. This gap costs the country critical revenue, irreparably damages vital ecosystems, erodes public trust in government, and undermines the legitimacy of the rule of law. As one of Suriname’s core economic pillars, the gold sector deserves far more than the endless cycle of new plans, new commissions, and unfulfilled promises that has defined reform efforts to date.

    President Simons has made a public promise to finally bring order to the gold sector. History will judge this promise not on words, but on tangible action—and that is where the greatest challenge lies. If the government is truly serious about reforming the sector, it will have to make difficult, unpopular choices that cut against the interests of powerful players. It will have to enforce the law against illegal activity, no matter who is involved or what political or financial interests stand to be harmed. That will almost certainly mean making choices that are unpopular within ruling party ranks and across the governing coalition.

    History will not judge the current government on its pledge to reform the gold sector. It will judge it on whether the government was willing to apply the law equally, to all parties, without exception or favor. The laws to regulate the sector already exist. The only remaining question is whether Suriname’s political leadership has the will to finally put them into practice.

  • In an act of subservience to the U.S., Colombia’s President-elect announces he will sever ties with Cuba

    In an act of subservience to the U.S., Colombia’s President-elect announces he will sever ties with Cuba

    In an official statement released on July 28, 2026, the Cuban Ministry of Foreign Affairs delivered a firm rejection of the recent announcement from Colombia’s incoming president, Abelardo de la Espriella Otero. On July 26, Otero revealed plans to shutter the Colombian Embassy in Havana and severe all governmental relations between the two neighboring Latin American nations, a move that Cuban officials say breaks sharply with the longstanding fraternal ties that have connected Cuba and Colombia for generations.

    The Cuban government stresses that the planned cut to diplomatic ties is entirely without justification, and runs counter to the core national interests of the Colombian people. According to the statement, the proposed decision makes clear that Colombia’s next administration will subordinate its regional policy to the longstanding U.S.-backed agenda of division and confrontation between the two countries. The move also aligns with the most extreme, baseless strands of anti-Cuban politics that have emerged in Colombian political circles in recent years, Cuban officials added.

    This break in bilateral relations stands in direct opposition to the vision of Latin American and Caribbean unity that the founding leaders of both nations fought to advance, a goal that communities across the region have sacrificed greatly to achieve. For years, Cuba and Colombia have maintained an open, productive bilateral relationship marked by meaningful progress across economic cooperation, cross-border trade, joint development initiatives and academic exchanges — advances that have delivered tangible benefits to citizens of both countries. Cuba has long prioritized deepening and expanding these mutually beneficial ties, the statement reaffirmed.

    Cuban officials emphasized that the incoming Colombian administration’s unfounded hostile action does not reflect the true feelings of the Colombian people. For decades, Cuba has stood in unwavering solidarity with Colombians working toward a lasting peace via negotiated political settlements to the country’s long-running internal armed conflict, a commitment the nation will continue to uphold.

    In line with the 2016 Colombian peace accords negotiated in Havana, Cuba will continue honoring all of its commitments to Colombian medical students currently pursuing their education on the island. The statement closed with a reaffirmation of the enduring brotherhood between the Cuban and Colombian peoples, noting that this people-to-people bond will outlast any political attempt to weaken it.

  • Message from the Army General to the people of Pinar del Río

    Message from the Army General to the people of Pinar del Río

    On July 28, 2026, a personal message from Army General Raúl Castro Ruz, a key leader of Cuba’s revolutionary movement, was officially released to the residents of Pinar del Río, following the province’s hosting of the national central ceremony marking the 73rd anniversary of the 26th of July Movement.

    The historic assault on the Moncada and Carlos Manuel de Céspedes barracks, carried out in 1953, is widely recognized as the foundational event that launched Cuba’s revolutionary struggle, and the date is annually celebrated across the nation as National Rebellion Day. Each year, Cuba selects a host community to hold the main national commemorative event, honoring the ongoing commitment of that region to the values and goals of the revolution.

    In his heartfelt message, Raúl Castro extended warm affection and formal recognition to the people of Pinar del Río, noting that the province earned the privilege of hosting the 2026 central act through the collective hard work, unwavering dedication to the revolutionary cause, and innovative, persistent labor of its residents. The message closed with a warm embrace to all people of the province, reinforcing the connection between revolutionary leadership and local communities across Cuba.

    The message was accompanied by an official photo distributed via the WhatsApp Channel of the Presidency of the Republic of Cuba, and was first published by Cuban state media outlet Granma with full attribution to Raúl Castro Ruz.

  • We Cubans today are also conquerors of the impossible

    We Cubans today are also conquerors of the impossible

    On July 26, 2026, a date marking the 73rd anniversary of the 1953 assault on the Moncada and Carlos Manuel de Céspedes barracks — Cuba’s National Rebellion Day — Miguel Mario Díaz-Canel Bermúdez, First Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba and President of the Republic, took the stage at the main commemoration in Pinar del Río. The gathering fell in the “Year of the Centennial of Commander-in-Chief Fidel Castro Ruz,” carrying extra symbolic weight for Cuba’s revolutionary movement. Opening the event, Díaz-Canel shared a pre-recorded message from retired Army General Raúl Castro Ruz, the historic leader of the Cuban Revolution, who conveyed warm affection and recognition to the people of Pinar del Río for their tireless dedication to the revolutionary cause and the honor of hosting this year’s national ceremony.

    Framing Cuba’s current struggle as a “new Moncada,” Díaz-Canel drew a direct parallel between the 1953 rebels’ risky charge against the Batista dictatorship’s barracks and today’s generation’s fight against what he called a genocidal foreign policy designed to suffocate the Cuban people and seize control of the island. He recalled that while critics dismiss the 1953 assault as a failure, that small spark of rebellion ignited the broader movement that ultimately brought the Cuban Revolution to triumph in 1959, echoing Fidel Castro’s core lesson that victory can emerge even from the greatest setbacks. He paid tribute to the legacy of Fidel, who famously declared in his historic self-defense trial that being Cuban carries an unnegotiable duty, and that abandoning that duty is an act of treason. Díaz-Canel also paused to honor the late revolutionary commander Ramiro Valdés Menéndez, a hero of the 1953 Moncada assault who passed earlier this year, marking the first National Rebellion Day since 1959 without his presence, calling for eternal glory to all who took part in the 1953 uprising.

    Díaz-Canel explained that Pinar del Río was chosen to host the main ceremony not only for its measurable political, economic and social gains, but because those victories stand as a testament to everyday Cuban heroism amid profound national hardship. He highlighted a striking local statistic: an infant mortality rate of 4.8 per 1,000 live births and a full year of zero maternal deaths, achieved despite widespread power outages and acute shortages of critical goods — results he called the definition of revolutionary heroism. The province has exceeded national expectations in advancing the Cuban government’s Economic and Social Program, meeting economic plan targets and balancing the state budget, growing export earnings, cutting the number of unprofitable state enterprises, and boosting domestic food production through collaborative work with small producers, while streamlining the process of granting land usufruct rights, a top national priority. He also celebrated Pinar del Río’s iconic tobacco industry, a globally recognized symbol of the region and a key export earner, as well as the food sector’s growing successful partnerships with non-state economic actors. The local Hermanos Saíz Montes de Oca University was highlighted for its commitment to tying scientific research and innovation directly to regional development, offering a model for other Cuban institutions. Despite widespread adversity, Díaz-Canel noted that Pinar del Río, a region with deep cultural roots and home to leading Cuban literary and artistic figures, has kept its cultural flame alive, protecting national heritage, expanding community cultural access, and delivering strong arts education outcomes as part of a collective effort to defend Cuban identity.

    Turning to the international context, Díaz-Canel issued a fierce condemnation of what he described as escalating aggression from Cuba’s historic adversaries, noting that as right-wing and far-right forces gain influence across Latin America, the United States has ramped up unilateral sanctions targeting Cuban companies, public officials, and even private or foreign entities that trade with or invest in the island. He singled out the latest round of U.S. sanctions, which target Cuban public health officials and medical services, calling the move a new low in infamy. He compared U.S. State Department officials, who draft sanctions lists and invent pretexts for coercion, to medieval authors of repressive military edicts and Nazi propagandists during World War II, arguing that Washington acts as if the entire world is its colony, dictating terms under threat of punishment. Díaz-Canel argued that the U.S. has declared a global war on left-wing movements and positioned Cuba as a primary target, claiming that U.S. leaders scapegoat Cuba to distract from domestic inequality that has sparked protests from working-class and impoverished communities, while criminalizing legitimate dissent to sustain their harmful policy toward the island.

    “Cuba is no threat to the United States or any nation on Earth,” Díaz-Canel emphasized. He pointed to Cuba’s decades-long history of global solidarity: sending doctors and teachers to regions where other powers send weapons, training thousands of young professionals from low-income nations around the world even amid its own hardship. Just this academic year, he noted, Cuban universities graduated 30,185 new professionals, including 735 from 62 foreign nations — among them 23 new Palestinian doctors and 5 American doctors. He argued that the true threat to regional and global security is not Cuba, but the U.S. policy of aggression that causes famine, mass impoverishment, uncontrolled migration, widespread instability, and tens of thousands of preventable deaths across the globe. He stressed that Cuba is the current victim of this campaign of economic suffocation, which is designed to provoke social unrest and install a government loyal to U.S. imperial interests, and explicitly denounced the six-decade U.S. blockade as a coldly calculated act of genocide.

    Díaz-Canel laid out the devastating human cost of the intensifying blockade, detailing that the U.S.-imposed energy and financial siege has caused prolonged national blackouts that often last more than 24 hours, shut down industrial production, and left tens of thousands of workers out of work. He shared grim national statistics that tell the story of widespread suffering: preventable deaths from a lack of medications that Cuba once produced and distributed freely or at low subsidized prices; more than 100,000 surgeries delayed or canceled due to unreliable power and a lack of fuel for backup generators; more than 118,000 cancer patients, including 1,200 children, who are forced to use less effective second- and third-line treatments because they cannot access first-line care; and a national rise in infant mortality to 9.3 per 1,000 live births, up from 4 to 5 in previous years. Behind every number, he said, is a child who died as a direct result of the blockade and its genocidal intent. He noted that the United Nations General Assembly has repeatedly condemned the U.S. unilateral coercive measures as violations of international law, arguing that it is illegal and criminal to torment an entire people simply to force them to overthrow their government. The latest U.S. slanderous report claiming Cuban subversion, he said, is nothing more than a mediocre propaganda pamphlet designed to build support for potential military aggression, and he held all those who design, implement, and tolerate the blockade accountable for the suffering and deaths of the Cuban people.

    Issuing a global appeal to the international community, Díaz-Canel warned that silence in the face of aggression against Cuba weakens international law and erodes the principle of national non-interference, clearing the way for future aggression against other sovereign nations. He drew a direct parallel to the ongoing crisis in Gaza, noting that global solidarity for the Palestinian people came too late for more than 70,000 Palestinians, including 21,000 children, killed by what he called a Zionist genocide that has turned the strip into mountains of rubble. “Defending Cuba from the cruelty of its executioners is not something that can wait,” he declared. He argued that defending Cuba’s right to sovereignty is a global fight against 21st-century colonialism, white supremacy, xenophobia, and hegemony, stressing that no nation is superior or inferior, and the old world order of emperors and subjects can never be restored.

    Díaz-Canel expressed profound gratitude to the global solidarity movement that has stood with Cuba despite U.S. pressure, including social movements across Latin America and the Caribbean, human rights organizations that have denounced the blockade at the United Nations and other global forums, parliamentary groups that work to end illegal sanctions, European civil society organizations that maintain ties with Cuban institutions, anti-imperialist and pacifist movements, and blocs of Global South nations that share the belief that national sovereignty is non-negotiable. He specifically thanked all governments that voted for the annual Cuban resolution condemning the blockade and the energy blockade at the UN General Assembly, despite heavy U.S. pressure, and recognized the international solidarity groups present at the ceremony, including Pastors for Peace, Carlota’s Warriors from New York, the Australian Association for Solidarity with Cuba, the José Martí Cultural Association of Miami, and the Marcapasos project. “Your presence is living proof that we are not alone,” he said, noting that defending Cuba at a time of maximum pressure is an act of courage that exposes the hypocrisy of powers that claim to defend human rights but stay silent in the face of genocide.

    Reaffirming that Cuba will never surrender, Díaz-Canel said that Cubans respond to the blockade’s suffocation with ingenuity, creativity, and the unyielding joy that defines the Cuban people, even in hard times. He echoed Raúl Castro’s 2024 call that unity is Cuba’s most important strategic weapon, stressing that unity does not mean uniformity — it means all Cubans, regardless of differences in approach, share the core goal of building a sovereign, independent, socialist, dignified, and prosperous Cuba that leaves no one behind. He noted that any fracture of national unity has always derailed the Cuban revolution in the past, making unity an non-negotiable priority.

    While praising the heroism and creativity of the Cuban people, Díaz-Canel stressed that individual effort alone cannot break the blockade, making ongoing national economic and social transformation a top strategic priority. He explained that Cuba is pursuing a process of macroeconomic restructuring, strengthening all forms of productive management, motivating workers and farmers, and opening pathways for responsible investment, always guided by the sacred principle that change cannot come at the cost of social justice. He noted that the revolutionary legacy of the Moncada assault demands that Cubans not fear change, but any transformation must always be rooted in the pursuit of the highest possible level of social justice, and that all economic and political decisions will remain in Cuban hands, with no foreign power allowed to dictate the island’s future.

    He noted that 2026, as the centennial of Fidel Castro Ruz’s birth, holds global significance, with revolutionary activists and friends from every continent set to travel to Cuba to take part in a colloquium and other events celebrating Fidel’s legacy. These events will offer a space to analyze Fidel’s extraordinary ideological contributions, assess Cuba’s current place in the world at one of the most difficult moments in its revolutionary history, and renew commitment to the revolutionary principles Fidel left to the Cuban people. Díaz-Canel called on all Cubans to honor Fidel’s centennial not just with words, but with action: through work, unity, dignity, and urgent determination to implement the transformations the current moment demands.

    Turning directly to Cuba’s young people, Díaz-Canel called them the present and the future of the revolution, noting that they are the heirs to the courage of the 1953 Moncada generation, and the first generation of Fidel’s centennial. He called on young Cubans to lead the current transformation from every neighborhood and every corner of the island, working to build change for the common good, just as previous generations fought for a better future for young Cubans.

    Closing the address, Díaz-Canel cited Cuban independence hero José Martí, who once said that a people’s greatest strength is faith in its own power. He issued a national call to action: no waiting, no lamenting, no settling for hardship, but thinking like a sovereign nation, pursuing new alternatives with creativity and boldness, protecting every scarce resource, increasing production, substituting imports, and developing national potential. He called on every Cuban, at their workplace, in their fields, in their schools, and in their neighborhoods, to see themselves as protagonists of the national transformation needed to overcome the current crisis. He ended with a message of hope, noting that just as the 1953 rebels faced overwhelming odds with courage and optimism, today’s Cubans are also conquerors of the impossible. Reaffirming Cuba’s commitment to the homeland, the revolution, and socialism, he closed with the iconic revolutionary slogans: “Long live July 26th! Long live the National Rebellion! Long live Cuba, sovereign and independent! Long live international solidarity with Cuba! Socialism or Death! Fatherland or Death! We will prevail!”

  • Here’s The True Cost of Feeding Belize’s Soldiers

    Here’s The True Cost of Feeding Belize’s Soldiers

    In a developing story that has put Belize’s public spending transparency under renewed scrutiny, leaked procurement records for the Belize Defense Force (BDF) 2023-2024 fiscal year food supply contracts have raised serious questions about potential overpayment, excess purchasing, and a lack of oversight in taxpayer-funded military spending.

    The documents, which outline contracts awarded to a small group of local suppliers for staple and premium food products for BDF kitchens, show that the Ministry of Defense paid far above national average retail prices for core goods, with price gaps reaching 64 percent for some items. When compared against monthly consumer price data collected by the Statistical Institute of Belize (SIB), which tracks average national costs for household goods, the discrepancies are impossible to overlook.

    For example, SIB data shows the highest average national price for a pound of chicken breast recorded between 2023 and 2024 was $4.73, reached in April 2024. However, leaked tender records reveal the Ministry of Defense paid J&J Imports $7.76 per pound for 1,000 pounds of chicken breast delivered monthly—more than $3 above the peak national average, and enough to generate $33,000 in potential annual savings even if the ministry had negotiated a rate of just $5 per pound. A second supplier, Kukulcan, charged the ministry $5.50 per pound for an additional 873 pounds of chicken breast each month, bringing the BDF’s total monthly chicken breast purchase to 1,873 pounds at a cost of more than $12,500.

    That level of purchasing for chicken breast alone has raised red flags, even before accounting for the 24,550 pounds of whole chicken the BDF bought from Kukulcan every month at $3 per pound. Across a full year, the defense ministry purchased more than 22,476 pounds of chicken breast and 294,600 pounds of whole chicken, totaling 317,076 pounds of chicken annually.

    The pattern of large-volume, above-average pricing extends to other protein items on the BDF menu. Kukulcan charged the ministry $23 per pound for 1,000 pounds of fish fillet monthly, amounting to $276,000 per year, while J&J Imports supplied an additional 1,466 pounds per month at $20.71 per pound, costing more than $30,000 monthly. Combined, the two suppliers delivered nearly 29,600 pounds of fish fillet each year.

    Other high-cost purchases include 1,320 pounds of baby back ribs annually ($19,260 total), 4,980 pounds of shrimp ($177,420 total), nearly 1,000 pounds of lobster ($24,402 total), and 15,312 pounds of ground steak ($157,500 total). When all counted, just these six meat items add up to nearly 360,000 pounds of meat per year, or an average of almost 986 pounds of meat per day. Even this figure does not include additional purchases of beef steak and ground chicken, which would push the annual total toward half a million pounds of meat.

    Cabinet Minister Kareem Musa, who is part of the ongoing investigation into the contracts, emphasized that procurement decisions should prioritize lower cost and full public transparency to protect taxpayer interests.

    “So if the Miras are offering the same vegetables at a lower cost than say, Save U and or Brodies then we should go the Miras, but at the end of the day it should be published for transparency purposes,” Musa said.

    SIB officials confirmed that the organization collects consistent, nationwide price data every month for its consumer price index survey, providing a reliable baseline to compare against the defense ministry’s contracted prices. Investigators are now focusing on two core questions: First, whether the Belizean government overpaid for food supplies by millions of taxpayer dollars by accepting inflated prices from selected suppliers, and second, whether the volume of meat purchased aligns with the actual consumption needs of BDF soldiers, raising questions about unreported diversion of supplies or inadequate contract monitoring. Coverage of this ongoing investigation was reported by Paul Lopez for News Five.