分类: politics

  • No place to hide

    No place to hide

    Delivering the opening address for the 2026/27 Sectoral Debate in Jamaica’s House of Representatives on Tuesday, Minister of National Security and Peace Dr. Horace Chang announced a landmark milestone in the country’s decades-long fight against violent crime, crediting targeted, sustained government investment in law enforcement for the transformative results.

    Central to Chang’s presentation was a striking improvement in arrest rates relative to homicides: the ratio of arrests per 100 murders has climbed dramatically from just 44 in 2012 to 99 in 2025, a near one-to-one ratio of arrests to lives lost to violent crime. ‘This is the essence of deterrence,’ Chang explained, noting that the growing certainty of capture and incapacitation sends an unmissable warning to individuals who turn to criminal activity.

    Over the past years, the Jamaican government has prioritized upgrading the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF), pouring resources into expanded personnel, new and renovated infrastructure, modernized patrol vehicles, and enhanced intelligence-gathering infrastructure. Chang emphasized that these investments have driven a fundamental shift in public safety outcomes that has not been seen in over 15 years.

    The most tangible indicator of progress is the national murder rate: in 2025, Jamaica recorded 674 homicides, marking the first time in 32 years that the annual total fell below the 700 threshold. The downward trend has accelerated into 2026, with first-quarter murder rates dropping 29% compared to the same period last year. Chang added that the final quarter of 2025 (with 153 murders) and first quarter of 2026 (with 134 murders) are the two lowest quarterly homicide counts recorded since the JCF began collecting structured, disaggregated crime data 25 years ago.

    Between 2017 and 2025, the cumulative impact of these security interventions has saved thousands of lives, Chang said: over that period, roughly 3,000 homicides occurred, compared to the higher baseline that preceded the government’s reforms. ‘That represents an average of 374 Jamaicans each year who are alive today because of these interventions,’ he stated.

    Beyond homicides, other categories of violent crime, including non-fatal shootings, have followed the same downward trajectory. Chang extended the Jamaican government’s sincere gratitude to both the rank-and-file of the JCF and the country’s international security partners, whose human and technical support have been critical to the progress. ‘Without these actions and investments Jamaica would have continued on a trajectory that could have made us one of the most unsafe places to live in the world,’ he noted. ‘We changed that path.’

    Chang attributed the breakthrough to disciplined, consistent execution of long-term reform, which has now pushed the country to a tipping point of accelerated public safety gains. The progress is rooted in two key improvements: stronger intelligence-led policing and more rigorous case investigation. Another landmark achievement is record-high firearm seizure rates: in 2025 alone, Jamaican law enforcement recovered 1,076 illegal weapons, most of which were pistols—the weapon most frequently used in homicides.

    The ratio of firearm seizures to murders has also improved dramatically, outpacing the rate of violent crime. Back in 2011, Jamaican authorities seized an average of 44 firearms for every 100 murders, a 4:10 ratio. By 2024, that ratio climbed to 73 seizures per 100 murders, or 7:10. In 2025, the ratio hit 15:10, meaning authorities now recover an average of three illegal firearms for every two murders committed.

    ‘This shows clear evidence that enforcement is now getting ahead of violent crime,’ Chang said. He framed the current performance as a major national breakthrough, enabled by better intelligence, inter-agency coordination, and a more cohesive national response to organized crime.

    Through the transformed JCF and deepened collaboration with other key security agencies including the Major Organised Crime & Anti-Corruption Agency (MOCA), Passport, Immigration and Citizenship Agency (PICA), and Jamaica Customs Agency, law enforcement is systematically disrupting transnational and local criminal networks and eroding their ability to operate. ‘In Jamaica, there is no hiding place for criminals. We will find them! We will incapacitate them! We will arrest and prosecute them!’ Chang declared. ‘Critically, our intelligence is now outpacing the criminals — and we will continue to strengthen it.’

  • Bullets litter crime scene in cops’ murder trial

    Bullets litter crime scene in cops’ murder trial

    A high-profile murder trial involving six current and former members of the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF) reached a critical procedural turn this week, when a judge granted prosecutors permission to present graphic crime scene imagery to the jury over repeated pushback from the defense team. The case centers on the fatal 2013 shooting of three men in St. Andrew, a confrontation that authorities say unfolded during a police operation, and has drawn intense scrutiny over the conduct of Jamaican law enforcement.

    The six accused officers are Sergeant Simroy Mott, Corporal Donovan Fullerton, Constables Andrew Smith, Sheldon Richards, Orandy Rose, and Richard Lynch. Fullerton faces an additional charge of filing a false statement to the Independent Commission of Investigations, Jamaica’s anti-corruption and police oversight body. The incident that sparked the trial dates back to January 12, 2013, when Matthew Lee, Ucliffe Dyer, and Mark Allen were killed during a shootout on Acadia Drive in St. Andrew.

    According to prosecution allegations, the three victims plus a fourth unidentified man were traveling in a blue Mitsubishi Outlander when they were flagged down by officers conducting a targeted operation. Prosecutors claim the driver initially hesitated to pull over, and after finally stopping, multiple men exited the vehicle and exchanged gunfire with the responding officers. The shootout ended with Lee, Dyer and Allen killed at the scene, while the fourth man managed to escape. This narrative is contested by the defense, which has challenged the prosecution’s evidence throughout the early phases of the trial.

    The key witness in this phase of the proceeding is a former JCF detective constable who was originally assigned to document the 2013 crime scene. The witness left the force years ago to relocate overseas for new employment, and his current work commitments made an in-person court appearance impossible. Following a special procedural application, the court approved the witness to testify remotely via pre-recorded video link, allowing the seven-member jury to view his evidence.

    The witness confirmed that he was the official photographer for the Acadia Drive crime scene, and also told the court that the crime scene extended beyond Acadia Drive to include portions of nearby Evans Avenue and Roxborough Avenue. During Tuesday’s proceedings, the jury and witness viewed a DVD containing more than 30 marked crime scene photographs. The vast majority of the images show spent bullet casings, mostly 5.56mm and 9mm rounds, scattered across the ground, alongside markings placed next to red stains the witness identified as blood spots and dried blood trails on concrete. Other notable items captured in the photos include a black and grey peaked cap, a leather wallet, and a fragment of what appears to be a leather belt.

    When testimony began on Monday, the former detective acknowledged a critical gap in his evidence: he could not confirm that a spent casing presented to court in an evidence envelope matches the casing he originally collected and sent to the government forensic laboratory for ballistic testing. When pressed by lead prosecutor Kathy-Ann Pyke to recall his actions on the day of the 2013 shooting, the witness said the 13-year gap made independent memory impossible. He explained that he relies on his original post-incident statement to refresh his recollection of the event, noting that written documentation is the standard method for preserving crime scene details.

    “I made notes at the scene. We preserve memory by writing statements, and that is why I refer to my statement and not memory. This statement refreshes my memory on what I wrote but not what I did on that particular day,” he told the court Monday.

    The defense team, led by defense attorneys Hugh Wildman, John Jacobs, and Althea Grant-Coppin, had formally objected to the jury being shown the graphic DVD imagery ahead of Tuesday’s session, but their objection was overruled by the judge. The trial is scheduled to resume proceedings on Wednesday, with additional evidence and witness testimony expected in the coming days.

  • Not JPS’s fault, says Paulwell

    Not JPS’s fault, says Paulwell

    As Jamaica navigates a heated public debate over the future of the Jamaica Public Service (JPS) licence – which is scheduled to expire in 2027 – and growing public frustration over persistent high electricity prices, Opposition Energy Spokesman Phillip Paulwell has pushed back against dominant narratives, arguing that flawed government energy policy, not the existing licence framework itself, is the root cause of the island nation’s affordability crisis.

    Speaking during his contribution to the 2026/27 sectoral debate in Jamaica’s Parliament on Tuesday, Paulwell dismantled what he framed as a misleading public conversation that links elevated power costs directly to the terms of JPS’s operating licence. Instead, he traced the problem to successive government failures to diversify the country’s energy mix and open up the sector to healthy competition, before laying out a comprehensive set of restructuring proposals to anchor any upcoming revised or renewed licence agreement.

    At the core of Paulwell’s plan is a fundamental overhaul of how electricity generation capacity is developed and approved in Jamaica. A centerpiece reform is the elimination of JPS’s current right of first refusal to replace its existing generation infrastructure. Going forward, he argues, all new generation licences should be awarded through the government-run Generation Procurement Entity (GPE) via a fully transparent international competitive tender, with contracts awarded based on the lowest-cost viable renewable energy technologies paired with high-efficiency energy storage solutions.

    “ You can’t award licences for renewables without thinking about storage, and the level of efficiency in storage has improved tremendously,” Paulwell told Parliament. He emphasized that expanding competition in renewable energy generation is the only sustainable path to long-term cost reduction, a position that aligns with global and regional policy trends shifting toward competitive procurement to cut energy prices and speed the clean energy transition.

    Beyond generation reform, Paulwell called for the long-delayed rollout of energy wheeling, a transmission mechanism that would allow large industrial and commercial businesses to generate power at one site and move it across the national grid to operations at other locations. He also pushed for expanded self-generation access, with a priority on the country’s special economic zones, arguing that allowing zone operators and tenants to produce their own power would cut operational costs, boost Jamaica’s global competitiveness, and attract much-needed foreign investment.

    For residential consumers and small business owners, Paulwell highlighted the urgent need to reform and improve net metering programs, which currently allow households with rooftop solar to feed excess power back into the grid. Updating these policies would put more money in consumers’ pockets and encourage broader adoption of residential renewable energy, he said. The opposition spokesman also proposed a major shift in distribution infrastructure, calling for competitive bidding for microgrid licences with a clear mandate to extend reliable power access to unserved and underserved communities across Jamaica. Even where public subsidies are required to make the projects economically viable, universal access is a non-negotiable public priority, he argued: “This is what it means to build with purpose and to build with people.”

    Paulwell also turned attention to systemic inefficiencies that drive up overall costs for all consumers, specifically highlighting widespread illegal power connections and unmetered usage. He called for a clear, enforceable national mandate to crack down on these losses, urging the government to take greater responsibility for addressing the issue. His approach would pair stiffer penalties for electricity theft in more affluent communities with targeted support to connect low-income households to the grid legally, removing the incentive for illegal hookups in marginalized areas.

    In addition to generation and distribution reforms, Paulwell called for clearer structural separation of JPS’s core generation, transmission, and distribution operations, as well as sweeping billing transparency reforms. Slamming Jamaica’s current billing system as one of the most opaque in the world, he argued that all charges – for generation, transmission, distribution, and system losses – must be fully disaggregated to give consumers clear insight into exactly what they are paying for.

    Consumer protection was another key pillar of Paulwell’s proposals, particularly around compensation for damaged household appliances caused by frequent voltage fluctuations. He called for an end to the practice of JPS avoiding liability by referencing fine print in consumer contracts, saying the sector must be restructured to prioritize robust protections for residential customers.

    Paulwell’s comprehensive set of recommendations comes as Jamaica enters a multi-year period of review ahead of the 2027 expiry of JPS’s current licence, with affordability remaining one of the most pressing public policy issues for Jamaican households. His intervention reinforces longstanding opposition calls to reframe Jamaica’s energy sector around consumer interests rather than incumbent utility preferences.

  • ‘Rules collapse if no enforcement’

    ‘Rules collapse if no enforcement’

    A growing political firestorm has erupted in the Bahamas after a top-ranking permanent secretary was photographed wearing partisan political gear on Nomination Day, prompting a former cabinet minister to demand formal disciplinary action and warning of systemic damage to the country’s civil service rules if the government fails to act.

    Brensil Rolle, the former Minister of Public Service, is leading the calls for accountability against Melvin Seymour, Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The controversy centers on photos published last week showing Seymour in clothing and accessories affiliated with the ruling Progressive Liberal Party (PLP), a move that critics say directly violates the long-standing General Order 949, the regulatory framework that mandates political neutrality for all public servants.

    Rolle emphasized that the dispute is far more than a superficial public relations problem: it strikes at the core of equal enforcement of civil service rules. If the government chooses to ignore Seymour’s violation, he argued, the entire regulatory system designed to govern public officer conduct will become unenforceable. Not only would this set a dangerous precedent for future violations, Rolle said, but it would also expose the administration to legal action from public servants who have already been disciplined for identical infractions under the same rules.

    “While I believe permanent secretaries have a right to their own political persuasion, as long as they’re holding that post as permanent secretary, they cannot violate any aspect of general order,” Rolle told reporters. “Any clear violation of general orders by a permanent secretary, like any other public officer, that person must be disciplined.”

    The timeline of the controversy adds an extra layer of gravity: as recently as February 2, Gina Thompson, Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Labour and Public Services, issued a formal circular to all senior civil servants explicitly reminding them of the requirements of General Order 949. The circular, titled *POLITICAL ACTIVITIES OF PUBLIC OFFICERS*, laid out the core principle of civil service neutrality clearly: “The character of any public service depends entirely on its loyalty, integrity, ability and impartiality. It follows therefore that public officers should maintain a code of reserve in all political matters and that the public airing of an officer’s own political views may destroy that impartiality which any Government may expect of its own public service. To ensure, therefore, that standards are upheld, it may be necessary in a case of serious indiscretion, to consider action against the public officer concerned.”

    What has amplified public outrage is the revelation that Seymour himself previously disciplined a subordinate foreign affairs officer for the exact same violation. In May 2024, Ivan Thompson, a foreign service officer, received a formal warning letter signed by Seymour for violating General Order 949 over his own public political engagement. After images of Seymour in PLP gear emerged, Thompson publicly shared the warning letter alongside the photos of his superior, calling out the blatant double standard.

    “Imagine being called in by your PS, getting a serious tongue lashing, not giving you any opportunity to respond, then issuing you this said letter. Then today, this picture comes across your phone by the very person demonizing you of the very thing!” Thompson wrote in a public Facebook post. Speaking to reporters, Thompson added: “When you consider that the Permanent Secretary runs the ministry — the minister is not responsible for the ministry — the highest official in any government ministry is the permanent secretary, and when you see the highest official in the ministry doing that, you know we have some serious problems.”

    Hilbert Collie, the attorney representing Ivan Thompson, noted that the incident raises fundamental questions about whether employment rules and disciplinary procedures are applied equally across all levels of the civil service. Rolle echoed that concern, noting that going forward, the government will have no legal or moral standing to discipline any other public servant for political activity violations unless it acts against Seymour first. Worse, he argued, any public servant who has already been disciplined for similar offenses while Seymour avoids consequences has a legitimate legal right to sue the government for unequal treatment.

    “Justice cannot be for some and injustice for everybody else,” Rolle said.

    General Order 949 does not ban public servants from holding private membership in a political party, but it does require all officers to maintain a public “code of reserve” to uphold the impartiality of the civil service. For senior civil servants like permanent secretaries, who earn total compensation packages valued at well over $136,000 annually — including a base salary of around $104,000, a $20,000 responsibility allowance, a $12,000 housing allowance, a car allowance, and full pension benefits for Seymour, who is already retired — the requirement for neutrality is considered especially strict.

    When contacted for comment on Monday, both Seymour and Foreign Affairs Minister Fred Mitchell declined to address the controversy. Observers note that the photos surprised many Bahamian political watchers, given the widespread understanding that the rules around this conduct are clear and non-negotiable. Under standard disciplinary protocol for General Order violations, Rolle said, the process would begin with a formal show-cause letter requiring Seymour to explain why disciplinary action should not be pursued against him.

  • Bain seeks to seal court records in $90,000 dispute

    Bain seeks to seal court records in $90,000 dispute

    As the Bahamas prepares for its upcoming general election, a high-stakes civil financial dispute involving one of the country’s opposition political leaders has moved back into the public spotlight. Lincoln Bain, head of the Coalition of Independents and a candidate in the approaching vote, is pushing to seal court records related to a 16-year-long $90,000 unresolved debt dispute — though his first attempt to secure the sealing order fell short earlier this month over a procedural misstep.

    The initial request for a sealing order was raised orally on April 1, 2026, during a Notice to Attend Examination hearing, with attorney Tanya Wright making the ask on Bain’s behalf. Travette Pyfrom, the attorney representing claimant Zinnia Rolle, immediately objected to the informal move, noting that no formal written application had been submitted to the court and that the proceeding was scheduled to be held in open, public court.

    While justices indicated they held no principled opposition to sealing the records in this matter, they confirmed they could not issue a ruling without a properly filed formal application before the court during the hearing. Court administration officials later confirmed that Bain’s legal team only submitted the formal written application one day after the hearing, on April 2, 2026. As a result, the request was not taken up for consideration during the April 1 proceedings, no sealing order has been granted to date, and all case documents remain accessible as part of the public court record.

    Details included in the submitted application outline Bain’s core arguments for sealing the dispute. As a prominent public figure running for public office, Bain’s legal team argues that confidential information shared during a closed-door chambers hearing held on March 13, 2026, was improperly leaked to the public and shared widely on the social media platform Facebook, despite explicit court warnings against disclosing confidential proceedings. The filing asserts the leak could only have originated from a person in attendance at the closed March hearing, and adds that Rolle has failed to appear at multiple court hearings over the past several years, leaving her potentially unaware of court-imposed confidentiality rules. Beyond the sealing request, the application also asks the court to require Rolle to attend all future hearings in person, unless explicitly exempted by the court or a mutual agreement between both legal teams. Bain has submitted a sworn affidavit in support of his request, court records confirm.

    The underlying dispute stretches back to a failed investment deal first struck in 2010. Rolle secured a Supreme Court judgment against Bain and his company in December 2021, ordering the defendants to repay $64,000 in outstanding funds. The ruling was upheld on appeal by the Bahamas Court of Appeal, and when the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council — the region’s highest court of appeal — declined to hear Bain’s final appeal in October 2025, the court awarded Rolle an additional $26,000 in legal costs, bringing the total unpaid judgment to $90,000.

    To date, the full $90,000 remains unpaid, and court-ordered enforcement actions to collect the outstanding sum have ramped up in recent months. As part of these enforcement proceedings, Bain was previously ordered to appear before Supreme Court Registrar Renaldo Toote to answer questions about his assets and financial status.

    The case has added new scrutiny to Bain’s public financial disclosures, which he submitted as a candidate in the upcoming May general election. In those mandatory declarations, Bain reported a personal net worth exceeding $1.5 million, and listed his total outstanding liabilities at just $85,000 — a figure that nearly matches the $90,000 unpaid judgment at the center of the ongoing dispute.

  • Residents of Whitehouse are not being targeted, says Mayor Vernon

    Residents of Whitehouse are not being targeted, says Mayor Vernon

    In a recent community gathering held in the coastal fishing neighborhood of Whitehouse, St James, Jamaica, Mayor of Montego Bay Councillor Richard Vernon has openly dismissed widespread rumors that the St James Municipal Corporation is specifically targeting local residents for unauthorised construction enforcement. The meeting brought together local leaders and community members to address a range of pressing local concerns, from public safety and solid waste collection to public health and long-awaited land formalisation efforts.

    Vernon stressed that cease-and-desist orders for unapproved construction have been issued to property owners across hundreds of communities throughout St James over the past 12 months, covering both high-income established neighborhoods and unregulated informal settlements. “There is zero credibility to the claim that we are singling out Whitehouse,” Vernon stated in an official press release published by the municipal corporation on Wednesday. “We have taken action in Bogue Village, Rosevale, Rhyne Park, Westgate Hills, Cornwall Courts and more. This isn’t just for informal developments either — even homeowners in formal communities are served notices when they build extensions, add new structures or make major modifications without securing the required legal approvals.”

    As the parish’s official local planning authority, Vernon explained that upholding construction regulations is a core responsibility of the municipal corporation. All development projects must align with the island’s official approved development order, he noted, adding that structured planning is critical not just for regulatory compliance, but to prevent unauthorised breaches and ensure all developments meet the standards required by Jamaican regulatory agencies.

    When pressed on why the formalisation push for Whitehouse is happening now, Vernon framed the timing as a proactive step aligned with Montego Bay’s ongoing regional growth. “This initiative doesn’t cost residents anything beyond the standard fees associated with securing official land titles,” he said. “The St James Municipal Corporation is partnering with relevant national agencies to make this regularisation process happen, and it’s all for the benefit of Whitehouse’s residents. Getting this done now will allow Whitehouse to integrate smoothly into Montego Bay’s wider development plans for the future.”

    The mayor also firmly rejected speculation that the corporation’s actions in Whitehouse are politically motivated, emphasizing that the entire effort is rooted in protecting residents’ interests. “This is a completely non-political move with one clear goal: to ensure these lands stay in the hands of Whitehouse’s hardworking residents, and that every resident gets an official land title. A title gives you power — it gives you security of tenure that can’t be taken away,” he said. The cease-and-desist notices were only issued to enforce orderly development across the community, he added.

    In the coming weeks, the municipal corporation will partner with Jamaica’s National Land Agency and GeoLand Titling to conduct on-the-ground investigations to verify the legitimate current owners of all parcels in Whitehouse, before completing the legal steps to transfer full property ownership into residents’ names.

    “Over the course of this project, we’ve done extensive research to confirm who the rightful owners are, and we’re ready to move forward with transferring these lands to the current legitimate residents who have built this community,” Vernon told attendees. “Owving your own piece of Jamaica with official legal documentation gives you the power to access financing from banks and carry out future development legally — that’s a game-changer for this community.”

    As Montego Bay continues to experience population and economic growth, the municipal corporation has a duty to ensure all construction follows national building codes and legal requirements, Vernon said. Multiple long-established informal communities across St James, including Norwood, Rose Heights and Barrett Town, have already completed the formalisation process, and Whitehouse is next in line. “Residents have occupied and built this vibrant community here for decades,” he noted. “This effort is all about formalising the area, opening up a clear path for residents to get official building permits for future construction, and we’ve brought on expert partners to support the community every step of the way. We’re here to work with you, not against you.”

    In an update on a high-profile local case, Vernon also announced that a compromise has been reached with the owner of Snappaz, a popular local seafood restaurant operating in an unauthorised building in Whitehouse, following a lengthy court battle. The court had originally ordered the full demolition of the structure and removal of all debris, due to its location posing a potential risk to air traffic at nearby Sangster International Airport.

    Recognizing that the restaurant is a major local employer that supports the Whitehouse community’s local economy, the municipal corporation opened negotiations with owner and operator Milton Russell. Under the agreed compromise, Russell will carry out targeted modifications to the building in the near term that will address the air safety concerns, eliminating the need for full demolition.

    This report was compiled by Trevion Manning, Damion Brown and Mayor Richard Vernon.

  • Paulwell urges gov’t to stop the ‘PR’ and get on with oil exploration

    Paulwell urges gov’t to stop the ‘PR’ and get on with oil exploration

    KINGSTON, Jamaica — In a pointed address during Tuesday’s 2026/27 Sectoral Debate in Jamaica’s House of Representatives, opposition energy spokesperson Phillip Paulwell, a former energy minister under the previous People’s National Party (PNP) administration, has publicly challenged the ruling government to set aside empty public relations and force United Oil and Gas to uphold the binding terms of its Jamaican oil exploration licence.

  • Mideast war ‘starting to weaken Europe’, says Erdogan

    Mideast war ‘starting to weaken Europe’, says Erdogan

    ANKARA, Turkey – In a high-stakes diplomatic exchange on Wednesday, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan issued a stark warning to German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier: the ongoing US-Israeli military confrontation against Iran is already beginning to erode Europe’s economic and political stability. A formal statement released by Erdogan’s office detailed the pointed remarks delivered during the bilateral meeting, where the Turkish leader emphasized the urgent need for a peace-first approach to de-escalate tensions spreading across the Middle East. Erdogan stressed that the conflict, which is centered in the immediate region surrounding Turkey, is not contained to the Middle East — its ripple effects are already weakening European foundations. If global and regional leaders continue to prioritize confrontation over negotiated solutions, the eventual harm inflicted by the standoff will reach far beyond the Middle East, leaving Europe with irreversible damage that will take decades to repair, Erdogan told his German counterpart. The remarks mark one of the clearest warnings yet from a major NATO leader about the cross-continental spillover risks of escalating tensions between Iran and the US-Israeli bloc, highlighting growing divisions within the alliance over how to approach the volatile situation in the Middle East.

  • OVERREACH!

    OVERREACH!

    A routine ethics hearing at Jamaica’s Parliament descended into fractious internal debate on Tuesday, as the Ethics Committee found itself in uncharted procedural waters, unable to resolve a fundamental dispute over its authority to recall sitting Member of Parliament Dennis Gordon of St Andrew East Central. What had been billed as a session where the media would hear testimony from Gordon instead devolved into a tense, wide-ranging debate over whether the committee has the legal standing to revisit a matter already finalized by the full House of Representatives.

    At the core of the standoff is the committee’s earlier recommendation on Gordon’s exemption application, which was already approved by Parliament. Newly surfaced public information has cast doubt on the accuracy of disclosures Gordon submitted as part of that original application, prompting some committee members to push for a second invitation for Gordon to appear to answer questions.

    Committee chair Marlene Malahoo Forte defended the effort to reconvene Gordon, framing the request as a matter of core procedural fairness. She argued that Gordon deserves a formal opportunity to respond to the new allegations before the committee draws any final conclusions. But after Gordon rejected the invitation to attend, the debate quickly shifted to the unresolved question of whether the committee retains any jurisdiction over the case once the House has acted on its original recommendation.

    Opposition MP Anthony Hylton, an attorney representing St Andrew Western, was among the most prominent voices calling for the jurisdictional question to be settled before any further action. Hylton emphasized that the committee cannot overstep the boundaries laid out in parliamentary rules, warning that the body’s authority is not unlimited. He pointedly raised the legal doctrine of functus officio, which holds that an official body has exhausted its mandate once it has completed its assigned task on a matter. “The fundamental issue for any committee has first to rest on its jurisdiction to address the matter,” Hylton said. “Our committees are not all-powerful; they are specific, they are limited to the mandates that are given to them, and we can’t do things ‘because it’s nice’.”

    While acknowledging the unprecedented complexity of the situation, Malahoo Forte pushed back against the argument that the committee must drop the matter. She stressed that the body cannot simply ignore new concerns about the integrity of the information that formed the basis of its original recommendation to the House. She also expressed deep discomfort with Gordon’s outright refusal to appear, arguing that the committee has an ethical obligation to examine whether a sitting MP’s rejection of its invitation is appropriate under parliamentary rules.

    “The ethical issue is not so much about what is happening in accounts, but is in relation to the truthfulness of answers provided to the committee which then grounded the recommendation of the committee to the House,” Malahoo Forte said. “So, again, it requires sensitivity, it requires fairness, it requires some reflection.” She added that the tone of Gordon’s rejection letter sat poorly with her, noting that the inquiry is not an attempt at political retaliation: “This is not about witch-hunting anyone, it’s not about pointing fingers at anyone, but it just does not sit well with me.”

    Gordon’s rejection of the invitation left little room for compromise. In his formal note to the committee, he wrote: “Good day, be advised that I will not attend any such sitting. This is overreaching the committee’s mandate. It has no jurisdiction or authority to summon me without an express referral from the full Parliament.”

    Committee member Natalie Neita Garvey, MP for St Catherine North Central, echoed calls for caution, highlighting the need to balance the committee’s mandate to uphold good governance with protections for the individual rights of the MP under scrutiny. Garvey argued that the committee should have clarified its procedural standing before extending a summons to Gordon, and that the body must respect Gordon’s decision to assert his rights under existing rules. “There could have been, from this committee, a clear request as to how we should proceed prior to summoning the member back here in an effort to make sure that we are protecting him as well as this House and this committee,” Garvey said.

    As the debate wrapped up without agreement, Malahoo Forte acknowledged that the impasse exposes deeper procedural challenges the committee will likely face in future ethics inquiries. With no immediate path to resolution, members voted unanimously to refer the entire question to the full House of Representatives for formal guidance before moving forward.

    The jurisdictional dispute has already been backed by formal legal advice from the Parliament’s own senior legislative team. In an April 21, 2026 memorandum, senior legislative counsel Tiffany Stewart laid out that under Jamaica’s Standing Orders, select committees like the Ethics Committee have strictly limited authority, confined only to matters formally referred to them by the full House.

    Stewart noted that the committee’s original mandate was limited exclusively to reviewing and reporting on Gordon’s exemption motion, a process that concluded when the motion was approved by both the House of Representatives and the Senate earlier this year. Once the House adopted the committee’s final report, Stewart wrote, the committee exhausted its authority on the matter, falling under the functus officio doctrine. Without a new formal referral from the full House, the committee has no standing to reopen the case, even when new information emerges.

    Citing longstanding parliamentary principles laid out in the authoritative guide Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice, Stewart’s legal opinion stressed that any effort to reconsider the matter, regardless of new evidence, requires a fresh substantive motion from the House of Representatives. “Committees are creatures of the House and possess no independent authority to amend or revisit decisions already sanctioned by Parliament,” the memorandum clarified. Stewart added that the proper procedural path, when new concerns arise after a report is approved, is for the House to either issue a new referral sending the matter back to the committee, or to rescind its original decision before any further review can proceed.

  • Blood on their hands

    Blood on their hands

    During Tuesday’s 2026/27 Sectoral Debate in Jamaica’s House of Representatives, National Security and Peace Minister Dr. Horace Chang, who also serves as deputy prime minister, delivered a charged address holding civil society organizations directly responsible for the recent fatal shootings of two retired police officers from his constituency. The minister, who has a long history of tense clashes with advocacy groups – most notably Jamaicans for Justice (JFJ), which he has previously accused of accepting “blood money” – doubled down on his scathing criticism, arguing that unfounded public claims of unjustified police killings created a culture of retaliation that led to the officers’ deaths.

    Dr. Chang detailed the circumstances of one killing to the chamber, identifying the victim as Mr. Brown, an elderly retired officer described as a quiet, unassuming man. Brown was shot dead by gunmen while driving his aged Toyota Corolla, after slowing down to navigate a pothole. The minister emphasized that just one week before the attack, public claims had circulated that police had killed an unarmed civilian without justification, creating a hostile narrative that criminals exploited to target vulnerable retired officers. “These were retired, so they [gunmen] found the soft targets,” Dr. Chang told lawmakers.

    While maintaining that Jamaica remains a robust democracy rooted in the rule of law, and asserting he welcomes legitimate criticism of Jamaica’s security forces, Dr. Chang pushed back against repeated calls from civil society for independent investigations into police-related fatalities. He noted that multiple domestic oversight bodies already monitor, evaluate and regulate the conduct of police officers and public servants, dismissing repeated demands for extra independent reviews as “foolishness.”

    Citing official data from the July 2024 report from Jamaica’s Independent Commission of Investigations (Indecom), Dr. Chang backed his argument with empirical evidence. Between 2011 and 2023, Indecom investigated 1,936 fatal shootings involving security forces, and only 66 of those cases proceeded to criminal prosecution – a prosecution rate of just 3.4%. Since the start of 2024, 11 police officers have been charged in connection with fatal shootings; of those, 8 were off-duty at the time of the incident, with only 3 facing charges for events that occurred while on active duty.

    In a sharp rebuke of JFJ and other advocacy groups that push for increased police accountability measures including mandatory body cameras, Dr. Chang challenged activists to experience the intensity of armed policing first-hand: “Sometimes some of these people who are calling for the police to always have cameras, they should go out there and go to Twickenham Park [training school] and let the JCF fire some rounds and let them hear what the M16 bullets really sound like.”

    Dr. Chang remained unapologetic for his stance, stressing that law enforcement officers should not be placed in unnecessary danger because of unfounded “verandah talk” – a colloquial term for unsubstantiated public gossip. He argued that civil society groups and public opinion should not interfere with the work of established oversight bodies, noting that when false narratives portray police as routinely killing civilians without cause, criminals become emboldened to retaliate against easy targets like retired officers. “If criminals come to believe that police officers are killing persons wantonly they will retaliate and attack other officers whom they perceive as soft targets. These groups must adhere to the evidence reflected in the data. It is wrong to do otherwise. It is dangerous, and it is immoral,” Dr. Chang insisted.