分类: politics

  • Off to a bumpy start

    Off to a bumpy start

    The constitutional reform process in Jamaica, aimed at transitioning the nation to a republic, has encountered a significant obstacle shortly after the new parliamentary term began. The reform, which was previously stalled due to disagreements between the Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) and the People’s National Party (PNP), faces renewed challenges as leaders clash over the approach to collaboration.

    Prime Minister Andrew Holness, leader of the JLP, recently invited opposition leader Mark Golding to partner in completing the reform process. However, Golding expressed disappointment when Holness proposed that he meet with Justice Minister Delroy Chuck instead of engaging directly. In a public letter, Golding emphasized that such an approach undermines the spirit of partnership necessary for meaningful progress.

    Golding highlighted the importance of bipartisan cooperation, noting that the government lacks a two-thirds majority in Parliament, making collaboration essential. He reiterated his commitment to achieving Jamaica’s full sovereignty by removing the British monarch as head of state and the Privy Council as the final court of appeal. While both parties agree on transitioning to a republic, they differ on the replacement for the Privy Council, with the PNP favoring the Caribbean Court of Justice and the JLP advocating for a domestic final court.

    The issue of the final court has been a contentious point, leading the PNP to boycott parliamentary committee meetings earlier this year. Golding called for a return to the collaborative spirit demonstrated by past leaders, citing historical examples of bipartisan efforts in constitutional reform. He urged Holness to reconsider his approach to ensure the reform process does not become futile.

    The public exchange underscores the challenges of navigating political divisions in pursuit of national transformation. As Jamaica seeks to redefine its constitutional identity, the path forward remains uncertain without genuine collaboration between its major political parties.

  • US delays visa surcharge

    US delays visa surcharge

    The United States has postponed the enforcement of a $250 visa surcharge, initially set to take effect on October 1, 2025, as outlined in the One Big Beautiful Bill signed by President Donald Trump in July. The State Department has yet to confirm a new implementation timeline, leaving applicants from non-visa waiver countries, including Jamaica, in limbo. Once enacted, the surcharge will increase the total visa application cost to $435 per applicant, as it adds to the existing $185 fee. The Department of Homeland Security will oversee the collection of this fee, which is intended to bolster immigration enforcement, deter visa overstays, and fund border security initiatives. Notably, the surcharge is refundable for visa holders who comply with all visa terms and depart the U.S. within five days of expiration or after legally adjusting their status. However, the lack of clear refund procedures has sparked concerns that many travelers may never reclaim the fee. Critics argue that the surcharge disproportionately affects low-income travelers and could discourage tourism and commerce, particularly from Caribbean nations like Jamaica. In 2024, the U.S. issued 83,957 B1/B2 visas to Jamaicans, and while 2025 figures remain unavailable, immigration attorneys believe the surcharge may not significantly deter applicants. Nevertheless, the additional financial burden—amounting to $1,000 for a family of four—could impact travel plans for events such as weddings, funerals, or vacations.

  • Open borders: Not a pressing priority for Barbadian consumers right now

    Open borders: Not a pressing priority for Barbadian consumers right now

    The Government of Barbados has announced plans to expand freedom of movement within the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) by opening its borders to at least three additional states, including two from the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS) and Belize. While this move is framed as a step toward regional integration, it has sparked significant criticism among Barbadians who feel it is ill-timed given the country’s pressing domestic challenges. Barbados is grappling with a soaring cost of living, stagnant wages, and overstretched public services. Many citizens argue that prioritizing border expansion before addressing these issues raises concerns about whose interests are truly being served. The potential influx of migrants, whether immediate or gradual, could exacerbate existing economic and social pressures. Critics liken the move to pouring water into a leaking bucket, emphasizing that it may worsen rather than alleviate the country’s problems. Unemployment and underemployment, particularly among the youth, remain high, and opening the labor market to more competition could further depress wages. Additionally, long healthcare wait times, scarce affordable housing, and inadequate schools and transportation systems are already straining the population. The Barbados Consumer Empowerment Network (BCEN) has expressed support for regional integration but insists it must be fair, reciprocal, and sustainable. They urge the government to focus on stabilizing the economy, reducing living costs, and improving public services before pursuing symbolic gestures of integration. BCEN emphasizes that leadership should be measured by how well it cares for its people, not by how quickly it opens its borders.

  • Grenada concludes 4th cycle of UN Human Rights Review

    Grenada concludes 4th cycle of UN Human Rights Review

    The Government of Grenada has successfully completed its participation in the 4th Cycle of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) at the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva. The delegation, led by Permanent Secretary Roxie McLeish-Hutchinson from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Export Development, presented the national outcome report, emphasizing Grenada’s steadfast dedication to human rights, democratic governance, and sustainable development. The report showcased significant advancements in justice, education, gender equality, and climate resilience, while highlighting ongoing efforts to strengthen institutional frameworks and protect vulnerable populations. During the review, Grenada received 171 recommendations and, following extensive national consultations facilitated by the National Mechanism for Implementation, Reporting and Follow-up (NMIRF), formally accepted 103. These recommendations now form the cornerstone of Grenada’s reform agenda, reflecting broad national consensus and legitimacy. Key priority areas identified include correctional reform, human rights and climate resilience, protection of vulnerable groups, advancing gender equality, and establishing a national human rights institution. Grenada expressed gratitude to the Commonwealth Secretariat and its multilateral and bilateral partners for their technical and financial support. The international community lauded Grenada’s transparency, engagement, and commitment to multilateralism. The government remains resolute in implementing the accepted recommendations, working closely with civil society, regional institutions, and international partners to ensure a rights-based future for all Grenadians.

  • Antiguan Lawyer Zachary Phillips Appointed as Legal Coordinator for AOSIS at COP30

    Antiguan Lawyer Zachary Phillips Appointed as Legal Coordinator for AOSIS at COP30

    ST. JOHN’S, Antigua — Antigua and Barbuda has taken a significant step forward in international climate diplomacy with the appointment of Crown Counsel Zachary Phillips as the Legal Coordinator for the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) during the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30). The conference is scheduled to take place in Belém, Brazil, from November 6 to 21, 2025. Phillips, who currently serves in the Attorney General’s Chambers, will play a pivotal role in advising the AOSIS Chair and lead negotiators on legal and strategic matters. His responsibilities will include coordinating positions across the negotiation agenda and assisting in the drafting and review of legal texts. This appointment highlights both Phillips’ legal expertise and Antigua and Barbuda’s increasing influence in global climate negotiations. Attorney General and Minister for Legal Affairs Sir Steadroy Benjamin announced the appointment to the Cabinet, describing it as a moment of national pride. He emphasized that Antigua and Barbuda’s growing presence in international forums reflects its strong advocacy for the interests of small island developing states, particularly in the realms of climate resilience and justice. The Cabinet extended its congratulations to Phillips and pledged continued support for nationals serving in high-profile international roles. This development underscores the nation’s commitment to addressing global climate challenges and its leadership in advocating for vulnerable states.

  • Trump declares drug cartels operating in Caribbean unlawful combatants

    Trump declares drug cartels operating in Caribbean unlawful combatants

    In a bold move that has sparked significant debate, President Donald Trump has officially declared drug cartels as unlawful combatants, asserting that the United States is now engaged in an ‘armed conflict’ with these organizations. This declaration, outlined in a memo obtained by The Associated Press, marks a dramatic escalation in the administration’s approach to combating drug trafficking. The memo justifies the use of military force under the law of armed conflict, signaling a shift in how the U.S. addresses the flow of illicit narcotics into the country.

  • COMMENTARY: No Empty Chairs: The Case for Attending the 2025 Summit of the Americas

    COMMENTARY: No Empty Chairs: The Case for Attending the 2025 Summit of the Americas

    The Dominican Republic (DR) is set to host the 2025 Summit of the Americas, a pivotal gathering of 32 Western Hemisphere nations. However, the event has already sparked controversy with the DR government’s announcement on September 30 that Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela will not be invited. The decision, framed as necessary to ensure broad political dialogue and summit success, mirrors the 2022 Summit in Los Angeles, where the exclusion of these nations led to protests and boycotts by some leaders. The DR emphasized that this move does not affect bilateral relations with the excluded countries. The exclusion is likely to reignite debates over ideological rifts within the hemisphere, particularly as global and regional challenges—such as conflicts in the Middle East and Europe—cast economic and security shadows over the Americas. The Summit’s agenda focuses on four critical security pillars: citizen security, energy security, water security, and food security. Latin America and the Caribbean face significant challenges in these areas, including the world’s highest homicide rates, water insecurity, and elevated food prices. The DR has been preparing for the Summit since February, with a draft declaration issued in June and negotiations among the 32 participating countries ongoing since September 11. A key initiative is the CEO Convocation, co-hosted with the Inter-American Development Bank, aimed at fostering public-private partnerships to address these challenges. Additionally, the Summit seeks to advance trade and economic integration across the region, with a focus on customs facilitation, reliable transportation links, and infrastructure development. Caribbean leaders are urged to attend to address specific regional concerns, such as the UN Security Council’s decision on Haiti and climate change negotiations. Despite the political controversy, the Summit offers an opportunity for leaders to engage in constructive dialogue, manage differences, and advance hemispheric cooperation. The DR government has framed the exclusions as a Summit-specific decision, encouraging leaders to attend and advocate for their national interests. Absence, it argues, only diminishes their influence in shaping decisions that impact the entire region.

  • Dominican Republic and Panama strengthen academic and educational cooperation

    Dominican Republic and Panama strengthen academic and educational cooperation

    In a significant move to bolster bilateral relations, the Dominican Republic and Panama have agreed to enhance collaboration in education and academic training. This decision was reached during a high-level Political Consultation Meeting held at the Dominican Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MIREX). The meeting was co-chaired by Francisco Caraballo, the Dominican Deputy Minister of Bilateral Foreign Policy, and Carlos Hoyos, the Panamanian Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs. Both parties reviewed their bilateral agenda, reaffirmed existing commitments, and explored new opportunities in key areas of mutual interest. Additionally, the Dominican Republic acknowledged Panama’s influential role at the United Nations, particularly its leadership in transforming the Multinational Support Mission in Haiti (MSS) into a 5,500-strong ‘Gang Suppression Force.’ As a tangible outcome of the visit, the two nations signed a Memorandum of Understanding on Academic Cooperation. This agreement involves MIREX’s Institute of Higher Education in Diplomatic and Consular Training (INESDYC) and Panama’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, aiming to foster advanced training and academic exchanges between the two countries.

  • Agriculture Ministry Rejects ‘Defamatory’ Post, and threatens Legal Action

    Agriculture Ministry Rejects ‘Defamatory’ Post, and threatens Legal Action

    The Ministry of Agriculture, Food Security and Enterprise has issued a firm rebuttal to a social media post accusing Minister Jose Abelardo Mai of involvement in local and cross-border criminal activities. In a statement released on October 2, 2025, from Belmopan, the ministry dismissed the allegations as baseless and part of a coordinated campaign of ‘fake news’ orchestrated by political adversaries. The ministry emphasized that the post is a deliberate attempt to divert public attention amid escalating political tensions.

    The ministry has vowed to pursue all available legal avenues against those responsible for the publication and dissemination of the defamatory content. It warned that individuals who repost or republish such false information could face similar legal consequences as the original publisher. The statement highlighted the legal principles of defamation, stressing that false or unverifiable claims about individuals are not protected under the law and that repeating such claims does not legitimize them.

    Additionally, the ministry referenced Section 15 of the Cyber-Crimes Act (Revised Edition 2020), which criminalizes the dissemination of false information intended to harm a person’s reputation. This suggests that the ministry may pursue both civil and criminal actions against the perpetrators. While the specific content of the post and its original publisher were not disclosed, the ministry urged the public to exercise caution and avoid spreading unverified information. It reaffirmed its commitment to safeguarding the minister’s reputation through all legal means.

  • Churches: Caye Caulker Vote Isn’t Breach of 2022 Referendum Pact

    Churches: Caye Caulker Vote Isn’t Breach of 2022 Referendum Pact

    Church leaders in Belize have clarified that the recent cannabis referendum in Caye Caulker does not contravene their 2022 agreement with the government. They assert that the referendum is a localized initiative and not a national policy shift. Senator Pastor Louis Wade, a key figure in the churches’ “No” campaign, emphasized that the 2022 pact with the Government of Belize—which mandates a national referendum before any legalization of cannabis—remains unbroken. Wade explained that the Caye Caulker vote is not driven by the Cabinet and lacks unified ministerial support, thus it does not breach the agreement. He stated, “Absolutely not, because there are ministers who have clearly expressed their opposition and have called for amendments to the Referendum Act to prevent such occurrences in the future. However, if the government proceeds with legalization based on a ‘yes’ vote, that would constitute a breach, and we would address it accordingly.” Wade further noted that the churches became formally involved after the Elections and Boundaries Commission restricted recognized participation to organizations represented by the four Senate social-partner seats. While the churches would have preferred a community-led “No” campaign, their formal recognition was necessary to ensure the effort’s legitimacy. Operationally, the churches are deploying scrutineers and a volunteer committee to oversee the election process, underscoring the localized nature of the exercise. Additionally, the churches have requested the petition signatures that initiated the referendum, citing concerns from island residents who claim their names were included without consent. The 2022 agreement between church leaders and the government explicitly requires a national referendum before any legalization of cannabis. Wade maintains that only Cabinet action to legalize based solely on the Caye Caulker results would violate this pact. In the absence of such action, the referendum serves as a local gauge of public opinion rather than a precursor to national policy change.