As vote counting continues in the Antigua and Barbuda general election, early results from Constituency ASW are starting to paint a clear picture of the preliminary race dynamics. Across the entire constituency, a total of 5,351 voters are officially registered to cast their ballots in this hotly contested electoral contest. As of the latest update, election officials have completed counting 80% of all ballots cast in the constituency. Early returns show the incumbent Antigua and Barbuda Labour Party (ABLP) candidate Anthony Smith Jr. holding a solid lead over his main challenger. Smith has secured 1,590 votes so far, putting him comfortably ahead of United Progressive Party (UPP) candidate Harold Lovell, who has accumulated 1,282 votes in the partial count. Election officials have also confirmed that 24 ballots cast in the constituency have been rejected, most commonly due to issues such as improper marking, voter irregularities, or damage that makes the voter’s choice unreadable. With roughly one-fifth of the constituency’s ballots still left to count, the race remains technically unresolved, though the current gap between the two leading candidates will be difficult for Lovell to close even with the remaining uncounted votes. This early result points to a strong performance for the ABLP in this key constituency, adding to the broader vote tally being compiled across the country as the nation waits for final official results.
分类: politics
-

Jadnanansing: Arbeid verdient waardering en eerlijke beloning
On the annual observance of Labor Day, Raj Jadnanansing, Deputy Minister of Suriname’s Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labor, has issued a formal message paying tribute to all working people across the South American nation who contribute daily to the country’s ongoing development and nation-building efforts.
In his official address, Jadnanansing emphasized that work forms the irreplaceable foundation of three core pillars of national progress: sustainable economic expansion, inclusive social development, and the preservation of individual human dignity. Going beyond a basic definition of work as the completion of routine tasks, he noted that employment grants people personal autonomy, long-term financial security, and the critical opportunity to build a better future for both themselves and their family members. Every worker, regardless of their occupation, job role, or sector of employment, makes an equally valuable contribution to Suriname’s overall advancement, the deputy minister added.
Jadnanansing extended explicit recognition to workers across every major industry in Suriname, including healthcare, education, construction, retail and services, mining, agriculture, and white-collar office sectors. He stressed that the consistent dedication and hard work of these individuals lay the groundwork for all social progress and economic growth that the country achieves.
At the same time, the deputy minister framed Labor Day as an occasion for reflection on the remaining challenges facing Suriname’s labor market. He openly acknowledged that gaps persist in ensuring fair working conditions, living wages, safe workplace environments, and accessible upskilling and training opportunities for all workers. To address these gaps, Jadnanansing confirmed that his ministry remains committed to improving the employability of Surinamese citizens through partnerships with key local institutions including the SAO, SPWE, SHTTC, and RACO. These efforts are designed to help Surinamese workers take full advantage of emerging economic opportunities, particularly in fast-growing new sectors such as sustainable energy and the country’s expanding oil and gas industry.
In addition to outlining government action, Jadnanansing called on employers, workers, and national trade union movements to continue collaborating to build a shared culture of open dialogue, mutual respect, and collective problem-solving. He noted that only through this kind of collaborative approach can Suriname achieve long-term, sustainable progress that benefits all segments of society.
Looking ahead to Suriname’s expected period of major economic transformation, the deputy minister reaffirmed that the national government will continue to advance policy and legislation that prioritizes social justice. He emphasized that all workers and their families must receive a fair share of the benefits from future economic growth, ensuring that development is inclusive rather than concentrated among a small subset of the population.
-

Column: De beste vriend van wantrouwen
Sometimes, it is not formal legislation, policy documents or official government procedures that reveal the deepest flaws of a country’s political culture, but small, unorthodox, and controversial incidents. The public uproar surrounding Jean “Saya” Mixon, an entrepreneur linked to Suriname’s Minister of Justice and Police Harish Monorath, is a striking case in point.
Monorath confirmed to local outlet Sign-in TV that Mixon, who accompanied him during an official visit to the Geyersvlijt police station, was one of his four personal advisors. He clarified that the role is unpaid and that Mixon does not have an official office at the ministry, adding that he holds the authority to appoint advisors to his team as he sees fit.
The revelation immediately ignited fierce backlash across social media and political circles. When Minister of Internal Affairs Marinus Bee told parliament on Thursday that Mixon could not hold an advisory position under the government’s formal appointment rules, many hoped Monorath’s misstep would be corrected transparently and properly. Instead, the parliamentary debate ended with the controversy more unresolved than when it began.
Despite sharp criticisms and widespread demands that Monorath acknowledge and fix his error, the minister avoided meaningful accountability. He only conceded that Mixon does not hold an advisory position in a legal, formal sense — a semantic dodge that he treated as a full resolution to the controversy, as if clever wording could erase the reality of Mixon’s public role alongside a top cabinet official. To compound the confusion, Monorath added that Mixon is part of his “intelligence network.”
This vague statement leaves a host of critical questions unanswered. Is this an official government role? An informal private network? A personal trust position? An information source? Who provides oversight for this position, what official powers come with it, and why was a person in this vague role openly accompanying the minister on an official visit to a police facility?
Across all modern governments, the term “intelligence” is never casual. It relates directly to information gathering, national security, risk assessment, and confidentiality — core functions of state that demand clear protocols, strict oversight, and no room for ad-hoc political improvisation. When a cabinet minister treats this area lightly, it creates dangerous uncertainty about where the line between formal state authority and private political networks is drawn.
Without issuing a public condemnation of Mixon as an individual, it is impossible to ignore that he is widely known as a controversial figure in Suriname. While legal status — whether convicted or acquitted of past charges — matters, good governance demands more than just adherence to the letter of the law. It requires political wisdom, moral judgment, and an acute awareness of public trust and institutional reputation. For a Minister of Justice and Police, the question of what signal an appointment sends to the public is non-negotiable.
When a minister responsible for law enforcement openly appears alongside a controversial entrepreneur with an undefined official status, it fuels public doubt. That doubt spreads beyond ordinary citizens to police officers, international diplomatic partners, and foreign investors. No one argues that ministers should cut themselves off from informal contacts outside formal government structures; governance naturally draws insight from all layers of society. But those relationships should be managed discreetly, carefully, and with full awareness of associated risks, not paraded openly on official stages as if there is nothing out of the ordinary about the arrangement.
The argument that Mixon does not draw a government salary is also no reassurance. Influence does not always come with a formal paycheck. Proximity to political power is often far more valuable than a regular wage. Access to top officials, informal status, expanded personal networks, and future political favors can deliver far more influence than a formal employment contract.
Beyond the immediate controversy, this incident exposes a deeper pattern in Suriname’s governance culture: the normalization of informal advisors, personal confidants, and associates of top political leaders who operate entirely outside formal regulatory and oversight structures. No one knows exactly what these figures do, but their presence is an open secret across the political system.
Suriname is a small, vulnerable nation that faces intense international scrutiny over its management of border control, anti-money laundering efforts, drug trafficking, counter-terrorism financing, and institutional resilience. Any hint of unclear informal power structures weakens the country’s standing on these critical global issues.
Parliament also deserves criticism for its handling of the controversy. While both coalition and opposition lawmakers raised legitimate questions, the body ultimately accepted Monorath’s semantic dodge about Mixon’s formal legal status. When the country’s highest oversight body settles for wordplay instead of accountability, it robs itself of its purpose and becomes nothing more than a toothless tiger.
It is fair to question whether the current government understands how fragile public and international trust in Suriname’s institutions really is. In an era of transnational organized crime and costly reputational damage, Suriname cannot afford to allow shadowy power centers to exist alongside formal state authority. Monorath had a clear opportunity to bring clarity to the situation, and instead he delivered confusion — the oldest and most reliable ally of public distrust.







