分类: politics

  • COMMENTARY: Once upon a time – Diplomacy in the image of our times [Shridath Ramphal Centre Trading Thoughts]

    COMMENTARY: Once upon a time – Diplomacy in the image of our times [Shridath Ramphal Centre Trading Thoughts]

    Over the past few months, cascading shifts in global political interaction have sparked urgent debate over whether core diplomatic practices are in terminal decline, or simply being reshaped to fit the norms of the digital age. This question resonates far beyond the corridors of foreign ministries, touching everyday citizens who feel the ripple effects of how global powers communicate and negotiate. For clarity, this analysis frames diplomacy as the formal practice of international dialogue and engagement between sovereign nation states.

    For centuries, diplomatic exchange relied on slow, deliberate methods: couriers traversed thousands of miles to carry encrypted written correspondence between capitals. Technological progress upended this system step by step: the telegraph, telephone, and fax machine cut communication time from weeks to minutes, making cross-border dialogue far more responsive. Today, the internet and social media have sparked the most dramatic shift yet, allowing sitting heads of state and government officials to communicate directly with global audiences and their foreign counterparts in real time, transforming both how diplomacy is conducted and the unwritten rules that govern it. This commentary examines the evolution of diplomatic norms, highlights troubling modern trends, and outlines actionable steps to restore professional standards to 21st century statecraft.

    The Golden Age of Traditional Diplomacy
    In its historic form, diplomacy was defined by intentional discretion and carefully guarded secrecy. Skilled diplomats relied on sharp intellectual acumen, refined social awareness, and tactical practical judgment to de-escalate tensions and broker agreements behind closed doors, far from the glare of public attention. Eloquence, mastery of nuanced language, and the ability to persuade through both written and oral rhetoric were non-negotiable core skills.

    As a scholar of diplomatic studies, the author recalls a famous lesson from her professor, attributed to former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill: that the mark of true tact is to tell someone they need to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the journey. Equally important was the understanding that timing and setting matter: there is a time to speak publicly and a time to stay silent, even when tensions run high. While deviations from these norms have always occurred, today they have reached an unprecedented scale, even among the highest-ranking elected leaders.

    Digital Diplomacy in 2024: A Break from Historic Norms
    Digital diplomacy, the modern model of statecraft for the 21st century, leverages internet connectivity to enable real-time communication, streamlined information sharing, and more accessible knowledge management across borders. Beyond formal negotiations and official intergovernmental communication, many foreign ministries now use digital platforms to connect with citizens living abroad, project cultural influence, and shape public opinion in other nations. Since social media rose to global prominence, heads of state, embassy missions, and international non-governmental organizations have flocked to platforms ranging from X (formerly Twitter) to Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn to conduct public diplomacy, turning a 140-character post or a Reel into a tool of statecraft.

    But alongside these new efficiencies, worrying negative trends have taken root in digital diplomacy. Modern public diplomacy on social media is often the direct opposite of the discretion, eloquence, and professional standards that defined traditional diplomatic practice. Today’s social media feeds are flooded with a confrontational new style of statecraft, where sitting leaders use profanity and derogatory language to insult foreign leaders and entire nations. Two prominent examples include a provocative Easter message targeting the Iranian government posted to X, and the persistent name-calling that the Argentine president has used to refer to other regional leaders. Public disagreements on social media often devolve into back-and-forth shouting matches that resemble adolescent high school feuds more than professional diplomatic exchange.

    Major foreign policy announcements are now made off-the-cuff via social media posts, rather than through carefully crafted official statements shared via diplomatic channels. Regional and international disputes that have historically been resolved behind closed doors are now dragged into the public sphere, with tangible real-world consequences. These consequences go far beyond making diplomacy look unprofessional: the ongoing deadly conflict in the Middle East is often reduced to trivial memes and satirical viral videos on social media even as thousands of innocent civilians lose their lives. Trade policy and tariff decisions announced via public social media posts create immediate uncertainty that ripples through global markets, leaving businesses facing falling demand and consumers stuck with higher everyday prices.

    There is no question that diplomatic standards have shifted dramatically in the digital age. The way many current leaders wield digital diplomacy has eroded decades of careful trust-building between nations and shaped global public perceptions of statecraft in deeply negative ways. Sitting political leaders routinely post and share content that fuels division and animosity between populations, undermining progress toward cooperative, positive cross-border relations. What we are seeing today is a redefinition of diplomacy led not by career-trained diplomatic practitioners, but by populist leaders who are meant to serve as role models for current citizens and future generations. The author notes that an extraterrestrial observer visiting Earth today would likely struggle to tell the difference between a head of state and a controversial social media influencer, based on how modern leaders conduct themselves online.

    Reclaiming Professional Standards for Digital Diplomacy
    This shift raises an obvious question: what can be done to reverse these harmful trends? The author argues that ordinary citizens are not powerless to push for change. Global voters can demand that political leaders adhere to basic professional standards when engaging in international dialogue, and can use their vote during elections to reject candidates whose confrontational, unprofessional online behavior contributes to the erosion of diplomatic norms. At the international level, multilateral institutions such as the United Nations should develop clear binding codes of conduct that outline expected norms for digital diplomatic engagement for all member states. These are modest, reasonable demands that do not require overarching systemic change to implement.

    While the world currently faces many crises that are outside of human control, how leaders engage with one another and shape global public opinion is a choice that can be adjusted. A baseline level of diplomatic sophistication is required to foster open, smooth dialogue, cut down on unnecessary cross-border friction, and prevent the kinds of dangerous miscalculations that can escalate into open conflict. Formal diplomatic protocol and measured, thoughtful language will always have a place in international engagement, whether interactions happen in person at an embassy summit or in a public post on a social media platform.

    Ultimately, traditional diplomacy as the world once knew it is in clear decline, reshaped by the dynamics of the current era: respect for international law has dwindled, core multilateral systems and institutions are facing unprecedented upheaval, and the global order has reverted to a dynamic described more than two millennia ago by ancient historian Thucydides: the strong do whatever they are able to, and the weak must accept whatever suffering they must endure to survive.

    This analysis was originally published by the Shridath Rampal Centre on April 30, with author Vanessa Mason serving as Research Assistant at the Shridath Ramphal Centre for International Trade Law, Policy & Services at The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill.

  • HOLNESS RUNS AGAIN

    HOLNESS RUNS AGAIN

    NEW YORK — For Jamaican-American politician Dale Holness, a third shot at Florida’s 20th Congressional District seat comes with a dramatically altered playing field: his two-time rival is mired in scandal, a partisan redistricting fight is roiling the state, and Holness enters the race with a clear fundraising advantage that has bolstered his long-held political ambition.

    Holness, a former Broward County mayor and county commissioner who first entered politics after migrating from Jamaica as a 17-year-old, has fallen short of winning the Democratic nomination for the solidly blue district twice before. In his first 2021 special election bid, he lost to Haitian-American candidate Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick by just five votes — a margin so narrow it defied most political expectations. A rematch in 2022 ended the same way, even with the backing of the district’s roughly 25,000 Jamaican residents, a key voting bloc that has long supported Holness.

    This cycle, however, the political landscape has shifted dramatically. Cherfilus-McCormick, who held the seat since 2022, resigned from Congress at the end of last month, mere minutes before the House Ethics Committee was set to vote on recommending her expulsion. The congresswoman faces felony fraud and ethics violations, centered on allegations that she diverted $5 million in erroneous COVID-19 relief grants awarded to her family’s health care company by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to fund her first successful congressional campaign. She has repeatedly denied all wrongdoing, but the scandal has gutted her political and financial standing.

    Even though Cherfilus-McCormick has signaled she plans to run for re-election, her campaign is crippled by debt and a lack of funds. She drained nearly all her campaign reserves to pay criminal defense legal fees, leaving just $11,000 on hand — an amount widely considered negligible for a competitive congressional race. Her campaign committee also owes six-figure sums to multiple outside law firms, and her total fundraising haul this cycle is the lowest of the five candidates competing in the August Democratic primary.

    With his longtime rival severely weakened, Holness now faces a new, more formidable challenge: a Republican-led redistricting effort that redraws the boundaries of Florida’s 20th Congressional District. The Florida state legislature approved the new map last Wednesday, which cuts Palm Beach County out of the district and adds the more Republican-leaning communities of Coral Springs, Margate, and Coconut Creek. Republican leaders hope the redistricting will flip the historically Democratic seat to their column, part of a broader national push by the party to gain multiple congressional seats across the country ahead of the November general election.

    The redistricting plan is already on track to face legal pushback, however. Florida’s 2010 “Fair Districts” amendment to the state constitution prohibits partisan gerrymandering — the practice of drawing district lines to intentionally benefit one political party or weaken minority voting power. The fight in Florida is part of a larger national redistricting battle that has erupted this cycle: Republicans in Texas led a similar redraw backed by former President Donald Trump to pick up five additional seats, while Democrats have successfully pushed through redistricting reforms in California and Virginia that could net the party nine additional seats combined. A recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that weakened a key provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which was designed to protect minority congressional representation, has also favored Republican map-drawing efforts in states like Louisiana.

    Despite the uncertainty of the new district lines, Holness remains optimistic about his chances. He told reporters that 70 percent of the original 20th District’s territory remains intact under the new map, and the areas that remain are ones he has represented and worked in for decades. “These are areas that I know quite well, areas where I have worked with the people over many years and to whom I have been able to bring a better way of life as commissioner and mayor,” he said.

    Holness also holds a substantial fundraising lead over all other primary candidates. His campaign reported raising more than $92,500 in the most recent quarter, leaving him with $312,672 in cash on hand after just $8,000 in expenditures. He credits his fundraising success to his long record of public service and his refusal to accept donations from political action committees, noting that most contributions come from ordinary working constituents in the district. Despite his strong position, he says he is not taking victory for granted, drawing on lessons from his two narrow past losses. “While I will acknowledge that I am in a fairly strong position, I also know that there is a lot more to be done,” he said. “I learned from past elections. I’m not hiring a whole bunch of high-paying consultants. I’ve been on the phone. Most of that money that I raised is from phone calls. I’m not spending money to make money.”

    Still, headwinds remain. It is unclear how large the Jamaican-American voter base will be in the reconfigured district, and campaign organizers face the challenge of mobilizing voters to turn out for the August 18 primary, an election that many constituents may overlook ahead of the November general election.

    Holness is building his campaign around core kitchen-table issues that resonate with working district residents, focused heavily on economic affordability. He has highlighted the soaring cost of living that has left many residents working two or three jobs just to make ends meet, criticized Florida’s decision not to expand Affordable Care Act Medicare subsidies that would lower health care costs for vulnerable residents, and pledged to address barriers to homeownership for young people and expand access to affordable childcare. “These are the issues to which I will devote my service if elected,” he said.

    A seasoned public servant, Holness was born in Hanover, Jamaica in 1957 and migrated to the United States at 17. He attended Broward Community College and Nova Southeastern University, and has worked as a real estate broker for decades, leading the local firm All Broward Realty. He began his political career on the Lauderhill City Commission from 2004 to 2010, won a seat on the Broward County Commission in 2010 where he served until 2022, and made history as the first Jamaican-American to serve as mayor of Broward County from 2019 to 2020, leading the county through the chaotic initial days of the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2021, the Jamaican government honored him with the title of Commander of the Order of Distinction for his outstanding service to the Jamaican diaspora.

    Alongside Holness and the scandal-plagued Cherfilus-McCormick, three other Democratic candidates are competing for the party’s nomination: Luther Campbell, Elijah Manley, and Rudolph.

  • Mitchell tells PLPs ‘give more vouchers’

    Mitchell tells PLPs ‘give more vouchers’

    A political firestorm has erupted in the Bahamas over the distribution of Treasury-financed gift vouchers in Abaco that bear the names of non-government employed Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) election candidates and party officials, with Foreign Affairs Minister Fred Mitchell becoming the first sitting government leader to publicly endorse and defend the controversial program.

    Mitchell’s unapologetic support for the initiative puts him sharply at odds with many within his own party, where multiple PLP figures have privately voiced shock that more than $200,000 in taxpayer money was allocated to the voucher program. Prime Minister Philip Davis has also refused to publicly address the growing controversy, leaving Mitchell’s outlier stance even more notable in the context of intra-party dynamics.

    The decision to attach non-government PLP affiliates’ names to public-funded assistance has sparked intense debate over whether the program violates anti-electioneering laws. The Bahamas’ Parliamentary Elections Act explicitly criminalizes giving, offering, or funding gifts, cash or other benefits with the intent of swaying voter behavior or securing a candidate’s election to Parliament.

    Speaking at a raucous PLP campaign rally in Bimini Saturday night, Mitchell brushed off widespread criticism from the opposition, arguing that Abaco residents prioritize access to tangible assistance over quibbles over political branding on the vouchers. “Duane Sands is an amazing fella, he is complaining because vouchers were being given out in Abaco and he says the PLP is connected in giving out those vouchers,” Mitchell told the crowd. “Well, let me ask you this, you think the people in Abaco care whose name was on the voucher? They want the vouchers, they want the help, that’s all that is necessary, and I’m happy the PLP is connected with giving out the vouchers. Give out more vouchers, the more vouchers you give out, the better.”

    Mitchell also pivoted to attack the opposition’s own record of ethical missteps, pointing to a past court case involving former opposition figure Frank Smith where a judge cited a multi-million dollar contract awarded to a key prosecution witness. “He has no complaint to make about giving out vouchers and trying to influence voters,” Mitchell said of Sands.

    The foreign minister doubled down on his defense of the program, asserting the entire initiative was ethically sound and framing opposition pushback as a deliberate tactic to halt the PLP’s public outreach work. “The fact is, ladies and gentlemen, there is no offence connected with it,” he said.

    Opposition Free National Movement (FNM) leader Michael Pintard has strongly condemned the Davis administration, accusing the government of breaking national law by using public funds to distribute gift certificates branded with PLP candidates’ names. Pintard has called the action an “egregious” violation of election rules and is pushing for criminal charges to be filed against responsible parties.

    Chris Lleida, chief executive officer of Premier Importers, the firm handling the vouchers, confirmed that the certificates were issued at the formal request of the Bahamas’ Ministry of Finance, confirming the program’s official government backing.

  • Gov’t announces $1.4b second phase of GO Road Rehab Programme

    Gov’t announces $1.4b second phase of GO Road Rehab Programme

    KINGSTON, Jamaica — Jamaican authorities have unveiled the second stage of the landmark GO Road Rehabilitation Programme, a $1.4 billion infrastructure investment designed to upgrade critical arterial routes spanning the Caribbean island. The announcement, shared via an official release from the Ministry of Works, outlines that the initiative will center on high-traffic road corridors that underpin public transit, cross-border and domestic commerce, emergency response access, the national tourism sector, and the everyday commute of Jamaican residents. This phase forms a core component of the government’s broader national infrastructure improvement strategy, which integrates immediate repair works with long-term rehabilitation projects already underway, including the national SPARK development initiative and the Accelerated Bridge Programme.

    Robert Nesta Morgan, the minister tasked with overseeing public works, emphasized that the launch of the second phase is a direct response to widespread feedback from road users across the country. Motorists, daily commuters, public transport operators, local business associations, and community groups have repeatedly raised urgent concerns about the deteriorating condition of the island’s major road networks, prompting the government to accelerate this phase of works.

    “We have listened closely to the calls from the Jamaican public. We recognize the deep frustration that poor road conditions have caused for regular road users, and we acknowledge that thousands of Jamaicans now struggle with arduous daily commutes because of the damaged state of many key thoroughfares,” Morgan stated in the official announcement. “This second phase of the GO Road Rehab Programme is built to deliver fast action on our highest-priority roads, rolling out tangible, meaningful upgrades exactly where they are needed most urgently.”

    Morgan further explained that the island’s entire road network has faced unprecedented strain over recent months, driven by extended periods of extreme rainfall and the lasting damage left behind by Hurricane Melissa. Even as emergency repair and preliminary rehabilitation works have continued nonstop since the storm, many major corridors have continued to decline. Key issues include saturated road foundations that compromise structural integrity, clogged and damaged drainage systems that cannot handle heavy downpours,大面积 failed pavement sections, and widespread structural stress across infrastructure exposed to repeated severe weather events.

    “Many of our roads already had underlying structural vulnerabilities before the hurricane hit, and Hurricane Melissa exacerbated and exposed these weaknesses for all to see. On top of that, much of the island has received well above average rainfall over the past six months, putting even more pressure on already compromised infrastructure,” Morgan added. “That is why the government is taking a layered approach, combining emergency spot repairs, targeted resurfacing, full drainage system upgrades, and large-scale full rehabilitation works across priority corridors.”

    Under the scope of Phase Two, works will include precision patching of damaged pavement sections, full resurfacing of high-wear routes, targeted upgrades to drainage systems where flooding and water damage are recurring issues, and additional improvement works tailored to the findings of technical assessments carried out by the National Works Agency (NWA). Priority ranking for works will be based on three core metrics: total daily traffic volume, the severity of surface deterioration, and the route’s strategic importance to local communities and national economic activity.

    The National Works Agency will take full charge of project implementation for the second phase, and has committed to publishing regular public updates as work schedules are confirmed and construction gets underway across different sites.

  • Guyana says neither Spain nor Venezuela ever administered the Essequibo region

    Guyana says neither Spain nor Venezuela ever administered the Essequibo region

    At the United Nations’ highest judicial body, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) based in The Hague, Guyana has launched a comprehensive argument challenging Venezuela’s territorial claim to the resource-rich Essequibo region, centering its case on centuries of administrative and historical evidence that contradicts Caracas’ assertions of ownership.

    Spanning more than 61,600 square miles, Essequibo makes up roughly two-thirds of Guyana’s total land area. The region, which is teeming with untapped natural resources and extraordinary biodiversity, sits between the Essequibo River along its eastern edge and the Venezuela border to the west, making it one of the most contentious territorial disputes in the Western Hemisphere.

    During the opening round of oral arguments before the ICJ panel, Guyana’s legal team and diplomatic representatives laid out a detailed historical record of the region’s occupation and governance. Ambassador Donnette Streete, who leads the Frontiers Division at Guyana’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Carl Greenidge, Guyana’s designated agent for the case focused on the 1899 Arbitral Tribunal Award’s legal validity, emphasized that neither Spain nor Venezuela ever established formal control over the territory. The first European settlers to occupy Essequibo, they argued, were Dutch colonists arriving at the turn of the 17th century.

    Between the 17th and 19th centuries, the territory was subsequently populated by descendants of enslaved Africans and indentured Asian laborers brought to the region by Dutch and later British colonial rulers. Today, Streete told the court, Guyana exercises full, uninterrupted sovereign authority over Essequibo: the national government collects taxes there, provides public administration, elects nine members to Guyana’s national parliament from the region, and manages its ecologically valuable biodiverse landscapes.

    Data from Guyana’s 2022 national census puts Essequibo’s current population at more than 313,000 people, accounting for over a third of the country’s total population. This population includes members of nine indigenous communities, who Streete confirmed are the original, long-standing inhabitants of the land.

    Greenidge, a former Guyanese foreign minister, supplemented the historical narrative with tangible documentary evidence, including archival maps and place-name records. The maps, he explained, clearly place the farthest eastern Spanish outposts more than 650 kilometers outside Essequibo’s boundaries, while 35 existing settlements within the region still retain Dutch-origin names centuries after their founding.

    Post-Columbian European settlement in what is now Guyana, Greenidge argued, begins definitively with the 1598 arrival of Dutch explorers. By 1616, the Dutch had formally established the Colony of Essequibo, built Fort Kykoveral along the Mazaruni River (west of the Essequibo River) as their colonial administrative seat, and extended settlement and formal governance westward all the way to the Orinoco River. In 1621, the Dutch West India Company took over formal administration of the colony, and the administrative seat was relocated to Fort Zealandia in 1744. “The Spanish, they were nowhere to be found, not east of the Orinoco, at any rate,” Greenidge told the court. “Their nearest outpost was San Tome on the banks of the Orinoco. This was the easternmost Spanish settlement. The Spanish governor there was candid about his predicament. The settlement, he wrote, was so far distant from other Spanish positions.”

    Beyond historical evidence, Guyana’s legal team built a robust case based on established international judicial precedent. Pierre d’Argent, a globally recognized expert in public international law representing Guyana, referenced two previous ICJ rulings on the border dispute issued in 2020 and 2023. He noted that Venezuela has never formally challenged the legal principle of res judicata — the rule that final court rulings are binding on all parties — nor has Caracas filed a formal application for review under Article 61 of the ICJ Statute, the only legal pathway to contest this binding precedent.

    “It must be concluded, therefore, that Venezuela has not discovered any new fact of such a nature had it been known as to be a decisive factor on the conclusions reached by the court in its judgments of 2020 and 2023 and in these conditions, these judgments remain res judicata for the parties in the court itself,” d’Argent told the panel.

    Paul Reichler, another senior member of Guyana’s legal team, added that Venezuela itself accepted, respected and abided by the 1899 Arbitral Award for more than six decades after it was issued. Caracas did not formally challenge the award’s validity until February 1962, when Venezuela’s UN permanent representative sent a formal letter to the UN Secretary-General contesting the ruling. Even at that time, Reichler noted, Venezuela explicitly acknowledged that the 1897 bilateral treaty underlying the 1899 award remained legally binding. It was not until 1963 — 66 years after Venezuela ratified the 1897 treaty — that Caracas first began to question the treaty’s validity.

    The ICJ is currently hearing the first round of oral arguments in the case, which is split into multiple three-hour sessions for each side. Both Guyana and Venezuela are presenting their full cases during this round, with proceedings set to continue through Friday and conclude next Monday.

  • ‘Partnership between peoples’ hailed as 524 Vincies get Taiwan bursaries

    ‘Partnership between peoples’ hailed as 524 Vincies get Taiwan bursaries

    At a celebratory presentation ceremony held on the island of Bequia, senior officials from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG) and Taiwan marked a decades-long bilateral partnership with the disbursement of EC$320,000 in educational bursaries to 524 local students spanning every academic level.

    The need-based and merit-based awards are distributed under the long-running Taiwanese Human Resource Development Programme, a sustained education-focused initiative that dates back to 1998. This year’s cohort of recipients includes students attending primary, secondary, tertiary and technical-vocational institutions across SVG, including learners from outlying islands such as Bequia, Mustique and the Southern Grenadines. Senator Lavern King, Minister of State in SVG’s Ministry of Education, broke down the distribution of awards: 244 primary school students, 190 secondary school students, and 90 tertiary or technical-level learners have been selected for this year’s support. King emphasized that the bursary funds are earmarked to reduce financial barriers for students, covering essential costs ranging from transportation, school meals and uniforms to learning supplies, so that learners can attend classes without financial anxiety. Recipients are chosen either for outstanding academic achievement or for demonstrating remarkable resilience in overcoming personal and economic hardship, with King noting that every selected student has fully earned their award. She added that the SVG government’s commitment to inclusive education shapes the selection process, with targeted support prioritized for students with disabilities and learners from low-income, marginalized backgrounds, in line with the policy goal of leaving no student behind.

    speaking at the ceremony, Taiwan’s ambassador to SVG Fiona Huei-Chun Fan outlined the enduring impact of the program, noting that more than 12,500 Vincentian students have benefited from the initiative over its 28-year run. The program aligns with Taiwan’s broader priority of investing in youth development and skills training, she explained, noting that “young people are not only vital to our present but also the bridge to our future.” Beyond the local bursary program, Fan added, Taiwan runs a suite of additional academic opportunities for Vincentian students, including youth employment and skills training schemes as well as full-degree Taiwan Scholarships. To date, 321 SVG students have completed bachelor’s, master’s or doctoral degrees in Taiwan, studying high-demand fields ranging from agriculture and healthcare to culinary arts and technology. Fan encouraged this year’s bursary recipients to pursue future study opportunities in Taiwan, highlighting the island’s global leadership in advanced technology manufacturing to motivate learners. She noted that Taiwan ranks as the world’s 22nd largest economy and sixth in global competitiveness, producing 13% of the world’s laptops and an estimated 90% of global AI servers. Taiwan also manufactures roughly 20% of the individual components found in every iPhone, including the most critical and high-value parts: the processor that powers device performance, the modem for cellular connectivity, Wi-Fi chips, semiconductor components, and the premium camera lenses that serve as the phone’s “eye,” all designed or produced in Taiwan.

    SVG Prime Minister Godwin Friday, who also serves as Member of Parliament for the Northern Grenadines constituency that includes Bequia, framed the educational partnership as far more than a formal government-to-government agreement. He emphasized that the program builds people-to-people ties that deepen bilateral cultural connections and outlast changes in political leadership. “It is a partnership between peoples,” he said. “When relations transcend governments and leaders and get down into the people… most importantly through education… that is a cultural deepening and a relationship that transcends just the level of government.”

    Friday described investment in education as the most critical offering that the state and society can make to young people, noting that developed knowledge and personal ability, built on natural talent, are the most valuable assets any person can hold. He called on local educators to embrace their role as a vocation, pointing out that teaching shapes lives permanently: negative classroom experiences, thoughtless comments or dismissive treatment can leave lifelong scars on young learners, while supportive, engaged mentorship leaves a lasting positive impact. “What you do stays with them for life,” he said, urging teachers to approach their work with the seriousness and respect it deserves. He also offered guidance to parents, encouraging them to prioritize engaging with their children’s schoolwork, even when busy: if caregivers show disinterest in a child’s work, he noted, that child is likely to lose interest in their own learning.

    Friday stressed that the partnership with Taiwan holds particular strategic value for SVG, which lacks large natural resource reserves such as oil, gold and minerals. For SVG, human capital is the nation’s most valuable core resource, he said, and long-term support from Taiwan has been critical to developing that asset. “We don’t have gold and silver, we don’t have oil, we don’t have any of those natural resources,” he said. “But we have the best, the most important one — the intelligence, the good health of our people, the goodwill of friends who would help us, like Taiwan, to achieve what we want to do in education.”

    Friday expressed SVG’s deep gratitude for Taiwan’s 28 years of continuous educational commitment, which comes alongside 45 years of formal diplomatic ties between the two sides. He called for the partnership to continue for decades more, noting that the program builds the foundational human capital that SVG’s national development depends on.

  • PM Browne urges end to ‘vitriolic rhetoric’ after election victory

    PM Browne urges end to ‘vitriolic rhetoric’ after election victory

    Following a historic landslide victory in the April 30 general election, Antigua and Barbuda Prime Minister Gaston Browne is pushing for a fundamental shift in the nation’s political culture, calling on all political actors to abandon divisive, vitriolic rhetoric and embrace a more measured, constructive public discourse.

    Browne made the remarks during an appearance on the *Browne and Browne Show* broadcast on Pointe FM Saturday, where he framed the election outcome as a clear rejection of hostile political tactics by the wider electorate. His Antigua and Barbuda Labour Party (ABLP) secured an overwhelming mandate, taking 15 out of 17 total parliamentary seats — a result that solidifies the party’s control of national governance for a new term.

    In his address, Browne argued that the misinformation, disinformation, and bitter resentment that have dominated past political exchanges have never worked to broaden a party’s appeal. Instead of winning over undecided voters, he said, these aggressive tactics only serve to trap political parties within the narrow bubble of their existing core supporters, failing to resonate with the broader electorate.

    “I don’t think that there is any need for the kind of rancor and the vitriolic rhetoric that we have seen before,” Browne told listeners. “All this misinformation, disinformation, all the rancor, all of the rhetoric — they do not work.”

    Entering his new full term as prime minister, Browne announced he will take a deliberately statesmanlike approach to governance in the coming years, prioritizing policy delivery and national progress over partisan confrontation. “I don’t know, as a full-term prime minister, that I need to be in any quarrels with anybody at this point,” he noted.

    Browne wrapped up his remarks by urging rival political factions to read the message sent by voters in the recent election. He called on all political actors to reassess their divisive strategies and work alongside the government to build a more collaborative, productive national political climate that serves the interests of all Antigua and Barbuda residents.

  • STATEMENT: Preliminary statement of CARICOM Election Observation Mission to the general elections of Antigua and Barbuda

    STATEMENT: Preliminary statement of CARICOM Election Observation Mission to the general elections of Antigua and Barbuda

    At the official invitation of the Government of Antigua and Barbuda, the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) assembled a six-person regional Election Observer Mission (CEOM) led by CARICOM Secretary-General Dr. Carla Barnett to monitor the country’s April 30, 2026 general elections. The mission brought together seasoned electoral experts from six CARICOM member states: Barbados, Dominica, Jamaica, Saint Lucia, Suriname, and Trinidad and Tobago.

    Mission leadership and the full observation team arrived in Antigua and Barbuda in stages between April 23 and April 27, with a departure scheduled for May 3. Ahead of election day, the delegation held broad consultations with a wide cross-section of national stakeholders to build a comprehensive understanding of the pre-election atmosphere and the readiness of electoral bodies. These meetings included discussions with Prime Minister Gaston Browne, leader of the incumbent Antigua and Barbuda Labour Party (ABLP), opposition United Progressive Party (UPP) leader Lars Jamale Pringle, representatives from independent and state-affiliated media outlets, prominent social media political and public figures, national police commissioner Everton Jeffers, and leadership from the Antigua and Barbuda Elections Commission and the Office of the Supervisor of Elections.

    On election day, the CEOM deployed its observers across 16 of the country’s 17 constituencies, ultimately accessing 182 of the nation’s 185 total polling stations to monitor every phase of the voting process. Observers arrived at their assigned stations before opening to audit the pre-vote setup, and their initial observations painted a picture of strong preparation. Adequate uniformed police presence was maintained at all locations, all polling staff arrived on schedule, and all required election materials were delivered in time to open polling promptly at 6:00 a.m. Each contesting political party had two accredited agents present at every station, all required voter notices and instructions were clearly posted, and opening procedures were followed fully in line with regulatory requirements. Polling opened on time across almost all stations, with a steady stream of voters already queuing by opening time, and the early voting process unfolded in an entirely calm and organized manner.

    At all stations visited by the CEOM, official voter rolls were posted prominently to allow electors to verify their registration. Information clerks were on hand to assist voters with checking their registration and directing them to the correct polling booth. CEOM observers noted that polling staff were well-trained, courteous, and consistently impartial, providing targeted assistance to elderly and disabled voters as needed, and explaining voting procedures uniformly to all electors. Turnout followed a predictable pattern throughout the day: peak voting volumes occurred in the early morning and in the final hour before polls closed, with a distinct lull in activity during midday. Despite the fluctuations in voter flow, staff remained focused on their duties throughout the day, ensuring all eligible voters were able to cast their ballots without unnecessary delay. All voting procedures observed aligned with the rules and guidelines published by the Antigua and Barbuda Electoral Commission.

    CEOM observers remained at their assigned polling stations through the close of voting at 6:00 p.m. Observers arrived early to monitor closure, and found that almost no queues remained at closing time. In the few stations where voters were still waiting to vote, all were permitted to cast their ballots in line with national electoral regulations. The mission also observed post-closure procedures, including the sealing of ballot boxes and the secure transport of ballots to central counting centers. At counting stations, observers monitored the tabulation process, confirming that ballot boxes were opened in the presence of polling agents and other official observers, and that counting was carried out in full compliance with established protocols.

    In its interim assessment, the CEOM concluded that the April 30 general election allowed Antiguan and Barbudan electors to exercise their democratic franchise in a peaceful, orderly environment, free from major disruptive incidents. The mission commended polling staff for their high level of professionalism, and praised national police for maintaining public order at all stations, noting that law enforcement interactions with voters and stakeholders were consistently professional and appropriate.

    The CEOM extended formal congratulations to the Antigua and Barbuda Electoral Commission for its competent administration of the entire electoral process, as well as to all contesting political parties, their polling agents, and supporters for conducting themselves in a calm, peaceful manner throughout election day. The mission also expressed gratitude to the CARICOM Secretary-General for the opportunity to undertake the observation mission and for the logistical and operational support provided to the team, and thanked all national stakeholders who met with observers to share perspectives ahead of the vote.

    This statement represents the mission’s preliminary, interim assessment based on on-the-ground observations. A full final report, including detailed findings and actionable recommendations for future electoral processes, will be submitted to the CARICOM Secretary-General in the coming weeks. CARICOM reiterated its longstanding commitment to continuing to support Antigua and Barbuda’s democratic development, and the country’s ongoing work to build a peaceful, unified, and prosperous future for all its citizens.

  • LISTEN: PM Browne says UPP Chair Gisele Isaac must resign after election loss

    LISTEN: PM Browne says UPP Chair Gisele Isaac must resign after election loss

    In the aftermath of a crushing general election defeat for the United Progressive Party (UPP), Antigua and Barbuda’s Prime Minister Gaston Browne is publicly calling for opposition party chair D. Gisele Isaac to step down from her leadership post, arguing that top party officials must bear accountability for the April 30 vote outcome.
    Browne made the call during an appearance on the *Browne and Browne Show*, broadcast on Pointe FM this past Saturday. The prime minister noted that Isaac had previously privately signaled to fellow party members that she would resign following the electoral loss, and is now pushing her to follow through on that commitment.
    “She had said to a number of her colleagues that she would resign, and now is the time for her to resign. I don’t know what she’s waiting for,” Browne told listeners during the radio segment.
    Beyond calling for her departure, Browne argued that Isaac’s exit from the UPP chair role is a necessary first step for the fractured opposition to begin rebuilding its political standing ahead of future elections. “She should leave office and resign as chairman of UPP” to open space for organizational renewal, he added.
    Browne’s calls for leadership change come on the heels of a historic landslide victory for his governing Antigua and Barbuda Labour Party (ABLP). The ABLP secured 15 of the 17 total available seats in the country’s parliament, leaving the UPP with only a tiny fraction of legislative representation after a deeply underwhelming performance at the polls.
    During his radio interview, the prime minister did not hold back in his assessment of the opposition’s campaign and internal governance. He sharply criticized the UPP’s campaign strategy, describing the party as deeply disunited and lacking a clear policy or ideological direction that resonates with voters. He added that the UPP’s top leadership failed to build meaningful connections with constituents during the election cycle, and warned that if party officials refuse to embrace necessary structural and leadership changes, the UPP will only continue to decline in influence.
    The prime minister emphasized that the UPP is currently at a crossroads: to regain political traction and relevance in Antigua and Barbuda’s political landscape, the party must implement sweeping reforms that bring new leaders and fresh talent into its upper ranks.
    As of press time, Isaac has not issued any public statement responding to Browne’s calls for her resignation.

  • PM Browne Pledges Non-Discrimination, Including on Sexuality, in Post-Election Addresses

    PM Browne Pledges Non-Discrimination, Including on Sexuality, in Post-Election Addresses

    Fresh off a decisive landslide victory in Antigua and Barbuda’s April 30 general election that earned him a fourth consecutive term in office, Prime Minister Gaston Browne has centered his early messaging on a radical commitment to inclusive governance, explicitly highlighting that all citizens — regardless of sexual orientation — will be equally served by his administration.

    Browne first laid out this vision in his election night victory address, framing the poll outcome as a fresh starting point to heal divisions left by a bitter, competitive campaign. He emphasized that pathways to contributing to national progress would remain open to every member of society, saying no one would be locked out “notwithstanding their socioeconomic standing, notwithstanding their political affiliation, notwithstanding his sexuality.” His core promise for the incoming term was that his government would work to lift up every resident, across every single community in the nation.

    The prime minister doubled down on this inclusive agenda during his official swearing-in ceremony the following day, tying the principle of non-discrimination directly to the conduct of all appointed government officials. He issued a clear warning to any public servants joining his new administration: they must carry out their duties fairly, with zero tolerance for exclusion, and no effort to sow division among the public. “They are expected not to discriminate against anyone and not to divide the country,” Browne stated.

    Expanding on the idea in philosophical terms, Browne framed national unity as a natural extension of shared belonging. “This country is our mother. She does not discriminate among her children. And neither should we,” he said. He also moved to ease voter fears of political retaliation, reassuring residents that differing political loyalties would not block access to state-run support and services. “Notwithstanding your political persuasion… we are here to serve all the people of Antigua and Barbuda,” he added.

    Alongside his commitment to inclusion, the prime minister pledged to build a culture of accountability within his new government, stressing that breaches of public confidence would not go unpunished. “The trust of the people is sacred… it must never be taken for granted and it will not be abused,” he noted.

    Political analysts point out that Browne’s repeated explicit references to non-discrimination, including his specific mention of sexual orientation, mark one of the most clear and public stances the prime minister has taken on inclusive policy as he embarks on his new term, signaling a potential shift toward more equitable governance for marginalized groups in the country.