分类: politics

  • PM Browne Joins CARICOM Leaders for Talks on Secretary General Dispute

    PM Browne Joins CARICOM Leaders for Talks on Secretary General Dispute

    The annual regional summit of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) has kicked off with a contentious leadership issue at the top of its agenda, drawing heads of government from across the bloc. The core point of contention surrounds the reappointment of incumbent Secretary General Dr. Carla Barnett, with two major member states – Trinidad and Tobago and Jamaica – raising formal objections over the procedural process used to extend Dr. Barnett’s term.

    The disagreement has sparked vigorous debate among attending heads of government, forcing leaders to pivot toward a third-party clarification to resolve the impasse. After closed-door discussions, the bloc reached a consensus: it will initiate a formal request for an advisory opinion from the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ), the region’s highest judicial body, to clear up ambiguities in CARICOM’s governing regulations related to the appointment and extension of the Secretary General’s tenure. As the legal process moves forward, Dr. Barnett will continue to carry out her duties in office, ensuring the continuity of the community’s administrative work.

    Beyond the leadership dispute, the summit is tackling a broad slate of pressing regional concerns that impact all 15 member states. Attendees are deep in discussions over shifting global geopolitical dynamics, which have sent ripple effects through the Caribbean’s small open economies. Other key priorities include strengthening regional energy security, shoring up fragile food supply chains, and addressing a host of ongoing socioeconomic challenges that have hampered post-pandemic recovery across the bloc.

    Antigua and Barbuda Prime Minister Gaston Browne is among the leaders participating in the summit, joined by a four-person delegation representing the island nation. The delegation includes Dr. Clarence Henry, Antigua and Barbuda’s permanent ambassador to CARICOM, Kurt Williams, a senior foreign service officer, and Juray Roberts, a project development officer.

    As the summit draws to a close in the coming days, attendees are expected to finalize binding decisions on a range of core regional priorities. These outcomes will guide CARICOM’s collective work over the next year as the bloc coordinates to tackle cross-cutting economic, political, and public security challenges that no single member state can address alone.

  • Barnett row for CCJ

    Barnett row for CCJ

    A simmering regional dispute over the reappointment of Caricom’s Secretary-General has taken a formal turn, with the bloc’s heads of government agreeing to seek a legal ruling from the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) to resolve the controversy, following persistent advocacy from Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar.

    After hours of closed-door deliberations at Monday’s annual retreat of Caricom leaders, the regional bloc announced it would officially initiate proceedings under Article 21(2) of the Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas to obtain an impartial advisory opinion on the contested reappointment of Dr. Carla Barnett. The move greenlights Persad-Bissessar’s proposal, which she had spent weeks building diplomatic support for ahead of the retreat.

    Trinidad and Tobago has stood firm in its objection to the process that led to Barnett’s reappointment, but Persad-Bissessar has repeatedly emphasized that the challenge is rooted in upholding legal standards and institutional governance, not a personal opposition to Barnett herself. Ahead of the retreat, the prime minister laid out her concerns in a detailed 22-page letter dated July 3, addressed to Caricom chair and St. Lucia Prime Minister Philip J Pierre, as well as every head of government and state across the bloc. In the correspondence, she detailed what she framed as major procedural and constitutional irregularities in the reappointment process, framing the CCJ referral as a principled step to clarify the rules rather than an attack on any individual or member state.

    In its official statement issued Tuesday, Caricom noted that the step aligns with the core purpose for which the CCJ was founded: to provide authoritative interpretation of the bloc’s founding treaty. “This is the very purpose for which the CCJ was created—to be a treaty interpretation body,” the statement read.

    Pending the court’s advisory opinion, Caricom has agreed to maintain the status quo, with no changes made to Barnett’s current position as Secretary-General. “The status quo with respect to the reappointment of the Secretary General shall remain unless and until the Community considers the said Advisory Opinion from the CCJ,” the agreement states.

    Leaders stressed that the agreed pathway is designed to resolve the impasse amicably, while allowing the bloc’s core work to continue without disruption. The approach preserves the Community’s ability to conduct its day-to-day affairs without prejudice to any side of the dispute, they added.

    The decision is also tied to a broader ongoing effort to strengthen Caricom’s institutional framework, a mandate approved at the previous Caricom conference held in St. Kitts and Nevis. Leaders underscored that the legal referral process does not call into question the integrity of any member state or individual involved. Instead, it reflects the bloc’s collective commitment to upholding the highest standards of good governance and continuous institutional improvement, the statement said.

    In closing, heads of government reaffirmed their unwavering commitment to regional unity, noting that the bloc faces a wide range of complex shared challenges in the current global context. “The Heads have reaffirmed their commitment to the ideals and objectives of the Community and will continue to move forward in unity to advance the interests of the Region during these difficult times,” the statement concluded.

  • Internal Order Groups: A valuable force for the smooth operation of Defense Zones

    Internal Order Groups: A valuable force for the smooth operation of Defense Zones

    Rooted in a long-held national principle that consistent peacetime preparation is the most reliable deterrent to conflict, Cuba’s national defense framework continues to refine its local organizational structures to better address both community needs and exceptional scenarios. On a Saturday morning in July 2026, Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez, President of Cuba’s National Defense Council, First Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba, and President of the Republic, carried out an inspection visit to the Wajay Defense Zone, one of seven such operational zones located in Havana’s Boyeros municipality.

    During the visit, Díaz-Canel held in-depth discussions with local defense personnel and stakeholders, receiving on-the-ground accounts of daily operations and collaborating to map out strategies for unlocking the full structural and organizational potential of local defense zones. The visit came as Cuban defense officials continue to strengthen the integration of Internal Order Groups into the broader work of local Defense Zones, a structural adjustment designed to enhance cross-stakeholder collaboration, streamline operational frameworks, and speed up the flow of critical information to serve both community welfare and emergency preparedness.

    Unlike traditional defense structures that focus exclusively on wartime scenarios, Cuba’s Defense Zone model is integrated with local People’s Council governance, tying national defense preparedness directly to the daily quality of life for neighborhood residents. Officers on the ground emphasized during discussions that the full integration of Internal Order Groups into the Defense Zone structure enables more accurate problem identification, more effective utilization of on-the-ground data, more robust strategic analysis, and ultimately faster, more targeted implementation of solutions to challenges ranging from routine community issues to large-scale exceptional events.

    During closing remarks, Díaz-Canel highlighted the unique contributions that Internal Order Groups have made to refining the organizational methodologies of local defense zones, working alongside existing established structures. He described the integrated model as a coherent, detail-oriented, flexible, and resolute approach to national defense and community organization that aligns with Cuba’s specific national context. The Cuban leader also praised the model for its ability to strengthen social cohesion by bringing together formal defense forces and local community members, improving operational outcomes at the individual district level across the municipality.

    Díaz-Canel closed his remarks by thanking attendees for their detailed analysis and actionable input, reinforcing his conviction that deeper integration of working groups within Defense Zones will directly translate to better overall operational performance. He noted that Cuba already maintains abundant organizational resources for local defense, and that tailored, context-specific solutions can always be developed to match the unique characteristics of any given locality.

    The visit was also attended by three senior members of Cuba’s Political Bureau: Army Corps General Lázaro Alberto Álvarez Casas, Minister of the Interior; Army Corps General Roberto Legrá Sotolongo, First Deputy Minister of the Revolutionary Armed Forces and Chief of the General Staff; and Major General José Amado Ricardo Guerra, Secretary of the Council of Ministers.

  • President verleent collectieve gratie; moord- en zedendelicten uitgesloten

    President verleent collectieve gratie; moord- en zedendelicten uitgesloten

    On July 8, 2026, Suriname President Jennifer Simons announced a sweeping collective pardon program for a cohort of the country’s incarcerated population, tied to the national celebration of the 163rd anniversary of Keti Koti — the annual commemoration of the abolition of slavery in Suriname. The multi-tiered sentence reduction scheme applies only to offenders who meet a clear set of eligibility criteria, with severe violent and sexual crimes explicitly excluded from participation.

    According to the official presidential decree issued to formalize the measure, pardon eligibility is restricted to inmates who received a final, unappealable court conviction for an unconditional fixed-term prison sentence or custodial sentence between December 2, 2025 and July 1, 2026. The program’s sentence reductions are structured based on the length of an inmate’s remaining sentence, to create a proportional impact:
    – Inmates with fewer than two years left on their sentences will receive a 5-month sentence cut
    – Those with remaining sentences between two and five years qualify for a 9-month reduction
    – Inmates with five to fewer than eight years remaining will see their sentences cut by 15 months
    – Offenders with eight or more years left on their sentences are eligible for an 18-month reduction

    Even inmates serving life sentences are able to apply for the pardon under specific conditions. The program allows for life sentences to be converted to fixed-term sentences, with the new term length set at either 20 or 50 years depending on which penal code was applied to issue the original conviction.

    Notably, the presidential decree permanently bars any inmate convicted of murder or sexual offenses from accessing the pardon program. All other aspects of original court convictions remain fully in force outside of the approved sentence reductions, the document clarifies.

    The announcement notes that Suriname previously issued a similar collective pardon to mark the 50th anniversary of the country’s political independence. In the period following that earlier program, a large backlog of clemency requests has built up, with administrative delays preventing many applications from being processed in a timely manner, per the country’s government. This new pardon initiative aims to address that backlog while aligning with the national spirit of reflection and renewal tied to the Keti Koti holiday.

  • Greene Calls for Public Cooperation as CHOGM 2026 Security Simulation Exercise Begins

    Greene Calls for Public Cooperation as CHOGM 2026 Security Simulation Exercise Begins

    As Antigua and Barbuda advances its preparations to host the 2026 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM), the Caribbean nation has launched a critical two-day national security simulation exercise, Foreign Affairs Minister and CHOGM Task Force Chairman Hon. E.P. Chet Greene announced in a public address to all citizens and residents.

    Greene emphasized that this drill is far more than a routine training exercise. It stands as a tangible demonstration of Antigua and Barbuda’s unwavering commitment to delivering a secure, well-organized and successful summit for Commonwealth heads of state and government when the global gathering convenes in November 2026. The simulation is designed to test response protocols, coordinate inter-agency operations and identify gaps in security planning ahead of the major international event.

    In his address, Greene extended formal recognition and praise to the law enforcement officers and security personnel leading the simulation operation. He noted that the dedication, personal sacrifice, and detail-oriented planning these professionals have brought to the process form the very foundation of the nation’s preparedness to welcome world leaders. He urged all participating personnel to uphold the highest professional standards throughout the exercise, noting that their performance reflects the quality and integrity of Antigua and Barbuda as a host nation.

    The task force chairman also offered sincere thanks to the general public for their ongoing support. Public cooperation and patience, he said, are irreplaceable factors that will determine the exercise’s ultimate success. Broad public participation in adapting to temporary changes underscores the unified “whole-of-nation” support behind the 2026 CHOGM hosting effort, sending a clear signal to the global community that Antigua and Barbuda is fully ready to welcome the Commonwealth gathering.

    Greene formally apologized in advance for temporary disruptions to daily public life, including expected traffic delays and temporary restricted access to certain areas. He stressed that these short-term adjustments are a necessary part of robust, effective planning, and that only thorough advance preparation can guarantee the safety of attending international delegates, local residents, and all event staff, while setting the foundation for a globally successful summit.

    As the simulation gets underway, Greene pledged full accessibility and support from himself, the national government, and the entire CHOGM Task Force. “We are all in this together,” he noted, adding that collective shared resolve will ensure the 2026 CHOGM is an event that makes all Antigua and Barbuda residents proud. He closed the address with a blessing for the nation’s security forces and the twin-island state.

  • Pawiroredjo: Ordinaire kwikdiefstal hoort niet achter gesloten deuren

    Pawiroredjo: Ordinaire kwikdiefstal hoort niet achter gesloten deuren

    A heated political clash has erupted in Suriname’s National Assembly (DNA) over plans to discuss the high-profile disappearance of more than 300 kilograms of mercury from the Geyersvlijt police station compound behind closed doors, with cross-faction lawmakers pushing back against the government’s push for a confidential committee general discussion. The controversy centers on a major theft case that has already sparked widespread public concern, with critics arguing the public has a right to full transparency, especially given the case touches on the integrity of the national police force itself.

    Multiple sitting members of the legislature have rejected the proposal to hold proceedings in secret, arguing that the seriousness of the theft and questions around police institutional integrity demand an open, public debate that allows Suriname’s society to follow the proceedings and hold officials accountable. Ebu Jones, a faction member of the NDP opposition, flatly rejected closed-door handling of the case. Jerrel Pawiroredjo, faction leader of the NPS, added that confidential committee general meetings should remain an exceptional procedure, not a default for common criminal cases.
    Pawiroredjo warned that treating a run-of-the-mill mercury theft with mandatory secrecy would push the National Assembly directly into covering up the issue, eroding public trust in the legislative body.

    Government representatives, including Justice and Police Minister Harish Monorath and government coordinator in the DNA André Misiekaba, defended the call for confidentiality, noting that an active criminal investigation into the disappearance is still ongoing under the leadership of the Public Prosecutor’s Office. According to the government, sensitive investigatory details cannot be released in an open plenary session, as public disclosure could jeopardize ongoing investigative work. The government offered to share full sensitive details with lawmakers in a closed committee general meeting if legislators desired more information, but this proposal drew sharp criticism from both ruling coalition and opposition blocs.

    Jones reiterated that the public already has broad awareness of the case and significant concerns, giving Surinamese citizens a legal and moral right to clear, public information. He emphasized that parliament has a fundamental obligation to uphold transparency when addressing missing materials and integrity failures within the police service.
    Krishna Mathoera, a legislator from the ruling VHP party, contextualized the mercury disappearance as part of a longer pattern of problematic incidents within the police apparatus, including other missing seized goods, allegations of extortion, and repeated integrity breaches. Mathoera stressed the issue extends beyond the active criminal probe, touching on core governmental accountability: “What measures is the Minister of Justice and Police taking to stop this kind of incident from happening again?” she asked.

    The government maintained its position that active investigatory work means names and operational details cannot be named publicly, while acknowledging that parliament has a legitimate right to receive accountability updates, noting the relevant minister has already outlined planned policy changes to address gaps. VHP faction leader Asis Gajadien and fellow legislator Rabin Parmessar underlined that the National Assembly retains the sovereign right to vote to make information public if it determines a closed confidential meeting is unnecessary, a precedent that has been set in previous parliamentary cases.

    DNA Speaker Ashwin Adhin outlined a compromise path forward, announcing that after consultations with the government, a new meeting has been scheduled for Thursday at 9:00 a.m. If the government determines all relevant details can be released publicly, the full meeting will be open to the public and media. If sensitive information is deemed necessary to withhold initially, the meeting will open in closed committee general session, after which the full National Assembly will vote on whether to transition the remainder of the debate to an open public session.

    A confidential preliminary meeting has already been convened, with the full parliamentary debate scheduled in the coming days. Multiple legislators have stressed that confidential committee general meetings must not become a routine tool to keep matters of public interest hidden from general view. They reminded fellow members that DNA Standing Order Article 100 mandates secrecy for all members for matters discussed in closed session, unless the full National Assembly votes to lift the confidentiality requirement. The government is set to discuss the matter at a cabinet meeting this week to finalize its position on what information can be released publicly ahead of Thursday’s scheduled parliamentary debate.

  • Mira at the Helm, Family-Linked Company on the Payroll

    Mira at the Helm, Family-Linked Company on the Payroll

    In a groundbreaking investigative report by local Belizean outlet News Five, newly leaked procurement documents have sparked fresh scrutiny of government contracting practices at the Ministry of National Defense, focusing on payouts to a family-connected business during former minister Oscar Mira’s tenure.

    Mira, a former enlisted soldier with the Belize Defense Force, made political history in March 2025 when he was sworn in as the substantive Minister of National Defense just days after that year’s general election. Promising to uphold Belize’s constitution and serve all citizens without favoritism during his oath of office, Mira stepped into the role after serving as a Minister of State within the same ministry, and held the top post until a cabinet reshuffle moved him to the Ministry of Home Affairs in late November 2025.

    But newly obtained Smart Stream payment invoices tell a troubling story about the flow of public funds during and after Mira’s leadership. Leaked records reviewed by News Five show that MP Farms, a fruit and vegetable supplier with direct ties to the Mira family, has secured more than $5.7 million in defense ministry contracts for food and rationing supplies between 2024 and June 2026. What has raised the most alarms is the dramatic surge in payments during 2025, the year Mira led the ministry: 74% of the firm’s total three-year earnings, equal to more than $4.27 million, was disbursed to MP Farms in that 12-month period. Even after Mira left the defense portfolio in late 2025, payments continued, with one disbursement processed as recently as February 2, 2026 – just three days after Mira denied any impropriety in public comments.

    Questions about irregularities in the defense ministry’s procurement process first emerged in early 2024, when Public Service Minister Henry Charles Usher acknowledged cabinet had discussed ensuring proper resourcing for the Belize Defense Force’s food and rationing programs, but stated no formal corruption allegations had been filed and the government would continue monitoring the process. The issue resurfaced in January 2026, when a reporter asked Mira directly whether any of his relatives held defense ministry supply contracts.

    Mira responded at the time that his family’s business had successfully bid for tenders under the previous government administration, implying no unfair advantage had been secured during his tenure. The newly leaked payment records contradict that framing, however, showing the vast majority of the firm’s earnings from the ministry came during Mira’s time as the top official at the defense department.

    The investigation has reignited long-running debates in Belize about the adequacy of anti-conflict of interest safeguards in public procurement, whether existing regulations prevent connected insiders from siphoning public funds, and what steps the current administration will take to audit existing defense ministry contracts and strengthen oversight moving forward. News Five’s full investigation, which first aired as a segment on the outlet’s evening evening broadcast, is available to view in full on the organization’s digital platform.

  • Major Lloyd Jones Raises Concerns Over BDF Supplies

    Major Lloyd Jones Raises Concerns Over BDF Supplies

    On July 7, 2026, a retired high-ranking former officer of the Belize Defense Force (BDF) has ignited public debate over alleged mismanagement of millions in defense spending, calling out current and former military-turned-leaders at the Ministry of National Defense for failing to deliver promised resources to frontline troops.

    Retired Major Lloyd Jones, who has remained closely engaged with BDF affairs since leaving the service, shared his deep frustration in a public Facebook post, pointing out that the ministry’s top leadership — Oscar Mira, Florencio Marin, and Chief Executive Officer Dario Tapia — are all fellow graduates of the prestigious Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, just like himself. Jones argues that this elite military training should have instilled a core commitment to troop welfare and strong accountability, but that commitment is nowhere to be seen in the day-to-day experiences of active service members.

    “At Sandhurst, even as young junior officers, we are taught from day one that the safety and well-being of the troops under your command must be your central priority if you expect them to follow you into battle,” Jones explained in his public comments. That core principle, he says, is being ignored in the current management of defense supplies. His criticism centers on two key areas: equipment procurement and troop rations. According to Jones, while official announcements highlight multi-million dollar spending on supplies, those resources never materialize for the soldiers who need them. “If you talk to the troops, they will tell you that the millions of dollars reported in the news never translates to what ends up on their plates,” Jones said. “Somewhere in the system, value is being lost, and it is the ordinary soldier who bears the unfair cost.”

    For Jones, the issue extends far beyond missing supplies and mismanaged budgets — it cuts to the heart of military integrity, a value every BDF officer is trained to uphold unconditionally. He emphasizes that integrity must be beyond reproach for military leaders, especially for former service members who have moved into political leadership roles at the ministry. Soldiers, Jones notes, are the first to see when systems fail: they stand guard overnight, handle ration pickups, and witness first-hand when orders for 10 sacks of supplies result in only five being delivered. When leaders fail to uphold integrity, troops lose all respect for their command, he says.

    Citing a lesson from his early career under General Garcia, Jones recalled that the general stressed that every soldier watches what leaders do, and leading by example is non-negotiable. “When you hold a leadership position, your every action is observed, and that matters. That is what is missing right now with Marin, Mira, and Tapia, and that is why this is such a serious problem,” Jones said.

    Jones is not a political outsider criticizing the ruling party: he is a long-time card-carrying member of the People’s United Party (PUP) and even ran as the party’s candidate for Belize Rural North in past elections. Yet he says his loyalty to the party does not override his commitment to the BDF and its troops. When asked directly if Mira, Marin, and Tapia remain fit to serve in their leadership roles at the Ministry of National Defense, Jones gave an unflinching answer.

    “I don’t think so. I don’t think they can recover from this,” Jones said. “Troops have already lost all confidence in them, and allowing them to stay would be a disservice to every man and woman in the BDF who works tirelessly, misses holidays like Christmas and New Year’s, and skips family milestones to guard our 8867-square-kilometer border.” Jones added that, by contrast, rank-and-file police officers have expressed strong approval of current leadership under Minister Julius, an example of how effective leadership inspires the personnel it serves.

    Despite his public criticism of PUP figures tied to the defense controversy, Jones reaffirmed that he will remain an active member of the party. He also praised Prime Minister John Briceno for moving quickly to address the allegations, a sign of confidence that the issue will be properly reviewed. This report is a transcript of an evening television broadcast, with all spoken content rendered accurately for online publication.

  • Political War of Words Escalates Between Briceño and Panton

    Political War of Words Escalates Between Briceño and Panton

    Verbal hostilities between Belize’s Prime Minister John Briceño and United Democratic Party Leader Tracy Panton, the country’s opposition chief, have spiraled into a full-blown political confrontation centered on explosive allegations of corruption and misuse of public office. The clash was ignited over the weekend during a ruling People’s United Party’s National People’s Congress gathering in the coastal town of Dangriga, where Briceño launched a pointed public attack on Panton’s past ministerial record.

    In comments delivered in Belizean Kriol at the meeting, Briceño challenged Panton’s credibility to lead discussions on governmental accountability, arguing that voters have not forgotten her decision to award the national Boledo lottery license to an ally of the previous Barrow administration. “Tracy thinks that people forget how she gave away Boledo to a member for the Barrow government. We have to remind her, who did she give the boledo to. We have to tell her she has no moral authority to talk about corruption, because Tracy has been one of the most corrupt ministers the government have ever seen,” Briceño stated.

    The opposition leader has rejected the claims outright and fired back with equally harsh criticism, labeling Briceño’s unsubstantiated remarks as a cowardly, defamatory abuse of executive power. Panton, who boasts a 20-year untainted record of public service dedicated to national development, said the prime minister has crossed a fundamental line of acceptable political conduct by attacking her reputation without a shred of evidence to back his claims.

    “It is cowardice coming from the head of state. Let the prime minister present the evidence he has. I have served this country for twenty years in public service unblemished, given my blood sweat and tears to the work of nation building and he will come after me. I hope he knows what ants nest he is stirring,” Panton said. “I say it because it is not acceptable to disparage or seek to defame or seek to malign a member of the National Assembly, the leader of the opposition at that, without any evidence.”

    As of July 7, 2026, the dispute has reached a new turning point: Panton has formally threatened to pursue legal action against the prime minister to clear her name and protect her personal and professional reputation, setting the stage for what could become an even more divisive chapter in the country’s pre-election political landscape.

    This report is adapted from a transcribed evening television broadcast, with Kriol-language remarks preserved per standardized spelling conventions.

  • Tribute to President Jovenel Moïse

    Tribute to President Jovenel Moïse

    Five years to the day after former Haitian President Jovenel Moïse was assassinated at his private residence, Haitian national authorities gathered in the capital Port-au-Prince on Tuesday, July 7, 2026, to hold an official commemoration ceremony honoring his legacy at the Villa d’Accueil.

    Organized under the leadership of current Haitian Prime Minister Alix Didier Fils-Aimé, the event drew a cross-section of the country’s top leadership: sitting government officials, the Secretary General of the Presidency, the Secretary General of the Council of Ministers, and senior command representatives from both the Haitian National Police (PNH) and the Armed Forces of Haiti (FAd’H).

    The core of the memorial opened with a requiem mass led by Reverend Father Jean Robert Louis. In his homily, Father Jean Robert Louis reflected on the universal nature of death, telling attendees that “death is the beginning of a new life”, noting that the former president had passed into eternal peace with God. He also urged attendees to remain spiritually vigilant, reminding the gathered faithful that death comes without warning, “has neither day nor date.”

    Following the mass, the ceremony proceeded with the traditional playing of the Last Post, the military bugle call used to honor fallen leaders, before drawing to a close with a period of silent contemplation for all in attendance.

    Beyond the formal rituals of the day, the 2026 commemoration underscores the commitment of current Haitian authorities to preserving the memory of Jovenel Moïse, whose 2021 assassination remains one of the most traumatic and divisive events in Haiti’s recent modern history, leaving a lasting national wound that has yet to fully heal.

    In a pre-recorded video message marking the five-year anniversary of her husband’s killing, former First Lady Martine Moïse shared her own tribute to the late president, which Haitian news outlets have made available for public sharing.

    Bocchit Edmond, a former Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs and former ambassador to the United States and the Organization of American States who served alongside Moïse during his presidency, released a written statement reflecting on his time working with the late leader. “Five years ago, on the night of July 7, 2021, assassin’s bullets ended the life of President Jovenel Moïse, taking with him a man, a leader, a vision for Haiti,” Edmond wrote. He added that even half a decade later, “the wound remains open, painful, and resistant to time. Some wounds never heal; they simply remind us of what we have lost.”

    Edmond noted that his cabinet and diplomatic posts gave him unique insight into Moïse’s character, separate from the public caricatures and political controversies that shaped his presidency. “Jovenel Moïse believed in Haiti. Not from a naive or blind faith, but from a conviction rooted in his origins, in his peasant roots in the North, in his profound understanding of his people’s suffering. He knew where he came from. And that is precisely why he knew where he wanted to go,” Edmond explained.

    He outlined the late president’s core policy priorities: expanding national access to electricity, advancing agricultural development, modernizing Haiti’s state institutions, and securing full economic sovereignty for a country that had been reliant on foreign support for generations. Moïse sought to break the systemic cycles of stagnation that had long held Haiti back, a goal that put him at odds with entrenched power brokers, Edmond argued. “He wanted to disrupt an established order that thrived on Haiti’s stagnation, and that, perhaps, was his greatest failing in the eyes of some,” he wrote.

    Edmond acknowledged that Moïse was not a perfect leader, but emphasized that his courage to pursue transformative change set him apart. “He was misunderstood, or rather—and history will be able to distinguish between the two—he was deliberately misunderstood by those whom his ambition for the country disturbed. No man is perfect; President Moïse knew this better than anyone. But perfection has never been a prerequisite for courage. And he had the courage to act,” he wrote. Today, as Haiti navigates one of the darkest periods in its modern history, Edmond said the absence of Moïse’s leadership is deeply felt, noting that the late president never wavered from his core commitment to advancing the well-being of the Haitian people.

    Edmond emphasized that holding all conspirators behind the assassination accountable is a non-negotiable moral obligation for the Haitian nation. “His assassination remains a crime against the entire nation. That it be fully solved, that those who ordered it be held accountable before the law—this is a moral imperative, a debt we owe to his memory, to his family, and to history,” he said. Closing his statement, Edmond paid his respects to Martine Moïse and her family, and wrote that truth will ultimately grant Moïse the justice his assassins tried to steal. “History, written not by weapons but by truth, will bring you the justice your assassins thought they could deny you. Honor and respect to your memory,” he concluded.

    Moïse Jean Charles, a former senator for Haiti’s Nord Department and leader of the Pitit Dessalines political movement, also released a statement for the anniversary. He framed the 2021 assassination as a coordinated international plot carried out with the complicity of local criminal actors. “Five years ago today, an international conspiracy, with the complicity of local criminals, infiltrated the home of the sitting President, Jovenel Moïse, to cowardly assassinate him in his bedroom. This act wounded the dignity of the Nation and plunged the country into the great maelstrom of insecurity and institutional destabilization that society continues to suffer to this day,” he wrote.

    Moïse Jean Charles argued that after five years, accountability remains out of reach due to systemic weaknesses in Haiti’s judiciary and successive compliant governments that have suppressed the truth to protect the assassination’s masterminds. On behalf of his political movement, he emphasized that no lasting national stability can be achieved without full transparency and justice for the state killing of the sitting president. “There can be no lasting stability without true and complete justice and without the truth being revealed about this major state crime,” he said.

    He added that legitimate leaders commit to fighting for their people’s dignity and justice, and never use political assassination as a tool to gain power: “When one kills to advance a cause, one ceases to be a liberator and becomes a criminal.”

    While honoring the legacy of Jovenel Moïse and offering condolences to his family, Moïse Jean Charles reaffirmed his movement’s policy roadmap for national recovery: only through implementing Article 144 of the Haitian constitution to establish a dual executive, rolling out the National Security Strategic Plan (NSSP), and convening a Sovereign National Conference can Haiti rebuild a strong, accountable state that guarantees security, justice, and equal rights for all citizens. He closed by reaffirming the movement’s core stance: “No stability without justice! Respect for the memory of the Nation!”