标签: Trinidad and Tobago

特立尼达和多巴哥

  • Preedy back from Japan, ready for Acoustic Experience

    Preedy back from Japan, ready for Acoustic Experience

    National Freestyle Champion Akeem ‘Preedy’ Chance has recently returned from Japan, where he showcased his soca talents during the Soca in Japan festivities. Now, he is gearing up for his highly anticipated Acoustic Experience event, set to take place on November 2 in St Clair, Trinidad. Preedy expressed his pride in seeing soca music transcend borders, noting its ability to inspire and uplift people worldwide. Reflecting on his time in Japan, he described the culture as respectful and deeply appreciative of soca’s vibrant energy, which brings warmth and joy to its listeners. Despite the Japanese emphasis on calmness and control, Preedy observed that soca music serves as the perfect catalyst for moments of uninhibited celebration. His recent single, ‘Jammin,’ released ahead of Miami Carnival, has already garnered over 265,000 views in less than two weeks, signaling its widespread appeal. Preedy also teased an upcoming collaboration, hinting that attendees of the Acoustic Experience might get an exclusive preview. The event promises a unique, intimate connection with his audience, offering a fresh take on his beloved songs. For more details, fans can follow @iland_boy_preedy on Instagram and other social media platforms.

  • Senator: Screen for learning impediments earlier

    Senator: Screen for learning impediments earlier

    Opposition Senator Janelle John-Bates has raised significant concerns regarding the government’s approach to child development and public servant compensation. During the Senate budget debate on October 27, John-Bates advocated for earlier screening of infants for learning impediments, arguing that the government’s proposed age of four to five is too late. She emphasized that early detection and intervention are crucial for addressing developmental delays in motor skills, speech, language, social and emotional skills, and cognition. John-Bates pointed out that other countries typically screen children between zero and three years old, leveraging the brain’s neuroplasticity during this critical period. She highlighted the importance of therapies such as speech, physical, occupational, and behavioral interventions to foster proper brain development. Additionally, John-Bates criticized the high cost of educational assessments and therapies, which can be prohibitive for many families. She also addressed the plight of single mothers facing the government’s 3.5% landlord surcharge, noting the difficulty of finding landlords willing to accommodate children. On the issue of public servant back-pay, John-Bates expressed skepticism about the government’s promise to deliver a 10% increase by Christmas, citing the absence of allocated funds in the budget. She graded the budget an ‘F,’ labeling it as ‘fluff, false, and fraudulent.’

  • Court of Appeal moves to clarify law

    Court of Appeal moves to clarify law

    The Bail (Amendment) Act, passed last year with bipartisan support from both the PNM and UNC, introduced significant changes to how individuals accused of serious crimes are treated. This legislation was necessitated by a landmark Privy Council ruling that declared the long-standing ban on bail for murder charges unconstitutional. The amendment allows bail in ‘exceptional circumstances’ and permits those charged with murder to petition for release if the state fails to present evidence within 180 days or if a trial extends beyond a year. However, the law left ambiguity regarding whether the same standards apply in cases of prolonged trials.

    On October 27, the Court of Appeal signaled its intention to address this unresolved issue. Justices of Appeal Gillian Lucky, Mira Dean-Armorer, and Carla Brown-Antoine have consolidated several ongoing cases to determine the correct legal test. The court will hear arguments in early 2026, weighing whether the legislative intent was to ease the burden on defendants, as argued by defense attorneys, or to maintain a high threshold even in cases of delay, as contended by the state. Stakeholders, including the Public Defenders’ Department, the Law Association, the Criminal Bar Association, and the Office of the Attorney General, will participate as interested parties.

    Justice Lucky emphasized the need for a consistent approach, stating, ‘What is the correct test?’ This judicial intervention highlights deficiencies in the parliamentary process, as the ambiguity was raised during committee discussions when the bill was debated last July.

    The urgency for clarity is underscored by recent observations from prison reform advocate Debbie Jacob, who noted that innocent individuals languish in prison for over a decade awaiting trial. A 2023 parliamentary committee survey further revealed that some citizens are reluctant to report crimes due to the ‘terrifyingly delayed process.’ The court’s move to clarify the law is a welcome step, potentially obviating the need for further legislative action.

  • Princes Town men win appeal against jail terms for disorderly conduct, obscene language

    Princes Town men win appeal against jail terms for disorderly conduct, obscene language

    In a significant legal development, two men from Princes Town, Eric Phillip and Paul Phillip, have successfully appealed their 14-day jail sentences for disorderly behavior and using obscene language. The Court of Appeal, presided over by Justices Charmaine Pemberton and Carla Browne-Antoine, ruled on October 28 that the sentences imposed by Magistrate Lisa Singh-Phillip were excessive. The incident, which occurred on November 27, 2024, on Tarouba Link Road in San Fernando, involved a verbal altercation with police officers at the scene of a family member’s vehicle accident. Both men pleaded guilty to the charges, while their relative, who also faced charges, pleaded not guilty, with his case still pending. During the initial hearing, the men’s attorneys emphasized their clients’ good character and remorse, pleading for leniency. However, the magistrate sentenced each man to 14 days’ simple imprisonment for each offense, to be served concurrently. The men’s legal team, comprising Aaron Mahabir, Yves Jacques Nicholson, and Mathias Sylvester, argued on appeal that the custodial sentences were unduly harsh and disproportionate. The Court of Appeal agreed, stating that while the conduct was improper, it did not warrant imprisonment. The court invoked Section 149(2)(a) of the Summary Courts Act, which allows for the substitution of a more appropriate sentence. Consequently, the prison sentences were quashed, and fines of $200 were imposed for each charge, with a default term of seven days’ simple imprisonment. The attorneys also highlighted the outdated nature of laws on obscene language, describing them as relics of colonial history that suppress local cultural norms and expressions. They argued that such laws are inconsistent with modern principles of free expression and personal autonomy. The State was represented by Sabrina Dougdeen-Jaglal.

  • Misrepresentation of Privy Council

    Misrepresentation of Privy Council

    In a recent letter to the editor, E Galy’s critique of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council’s role in the Jason Jones case demonstrates a profound misunderstanding of constitutional law and the judiciary’s function in a democratic society. Galy’s assertion that the Privy Council overstepped its bounds by altering the Constitution is not only incorrect but also dangerously misleading. This rebuttal seeks to clarify the constitutional principles at play and reaffirm the judiciary’s vital role in safeguarding the rule of law.

    First and foremost, the Privy Council, as the highest appellate court for Trinidad and Tobago (TT), is tasked with interpreting and enforcing the Constitution. Section 2 of the Constitution explicitly designates it as the ‘supreme law of the land,’ rendering any inconsistent legislation void. The judiciary, not Parliament, is the ultimate arbiter of constitutional validity. This separation of powers is foundational to preventing elected dictatorship and ensuring democratic governance.

    Second, the Jason Jones decision did not ‘change’ the Constitution but rather interpreted it in light of its guarantees of equality, privacy, and personal protection (sections 4 and 5). The court ruled that colonial-era laws criminalizing consensual adult acts in private violated these fundamental rights. This was not judicial activism but the fulfillment of the court’s constitutional duty to strike down laws that contravene the supreme law, as mandated by section 14(1).

    Third, Galy’s claim that the court cannot render a law inoperable if it aligns with the Constitution is a fundamental misrepresentation of judicial review. Established in cases like Marbury v Madison (1803) and reaffirmed in Commonwealth jurisprudence, judicial review empowers courts to invalidate statutes inconsistent with the Constitution. This principle ensures that constitutional supremacy is upheld.

    Fourth, Galy’s dismissal of ‘changed times’ as irrelevant to constitutional interpretation is misguided. The Constitution is a living document, as affirmed by the Privy Council in cases like Reyes v The Queen (2002) and Matthew v The State (2004). It must be interpreted in a manner that reflects evolving societal standards of dignity and equality.

    Galy’s argument, rooted in theocratic posturing rather than constitutional reasoning, conflates religious morality with legal interpretation. This stance is incompatible with the secular rule of law enshrined in TT’s 1976 Constitution. Sovereignty lies with the people and the Constitution, not with religious dogma.

    Finally, the assertion that judicial review ‘mutates’ civil and criminal law is legally untenable. When a law is declared unconstitutional, it is void ab initio, ensuring the coherence of the legal system. The judiciary’s role is to preserve constitutional order, not to subvert it.

    In conclusion, the Privy Council’s decision in the Jason Jones case was a reaffirmation of constitutional supremacy and judicial duty. Public discourse must rise above misconceptions that equate judicial independence with political interference. The true tragedy lies in the persistence of such uninformed critiques in our public dialogue.

    MOHAN RAMCHARAN
    Birmingham, UK

  • Windies claim T20 series win vs Bangladesh

    Windies claim T20 series win vs Bangladesh

    The West Indies cricket team clinched an unassailable 2-0 lead in their three-match T20 series against Bangladesh with a 14-run victory in the second game, held on October 29 in Chattogram. Fast bowler Romario Shepherd was awarded Player of the Match for his stellar performance, taking 3/29, as the visitors defended their total of 149/9. The Windies’ innings was anchored by half-centuries from skipper Shai Hope (55) and Alick Athanaze (52), who built a solid 105-run partnership for the second wicket. Despite a valiant effort from Bangladesh’s opener Tanzid Hasan (61), the hosts fell short, managing only 135/8 in their chase. The West Indies’ bowling attack, led by Akeal Hosein (3/22), Shepherd, and Jason Holder (2/20), proved decisive in restricting Bangladesh. The final T20 of the series is scheduled for October 31.

  • Some budget concerns

    Some budget concerns

    The 2025-2026 budget of Trinidad and Tobago has sparked skepticism among analysts, including economist Trevor Sudama, who questions its ability to deliver sustainable economic improvements. While the budget aims to enhance citizens’ quality of life through diversification and innovation, Sudama highlights several concerns that undermine its credibility. The budget relies on overly optimistic revenue projections, which are unlikely to materialize, potentially widening the fiscal deficit. Increased borrowing may be necessary to cover the shortfall, raising concerns about long-term economic stability. Additionally, the budget lacks clarity on funding for newly announced job creation initiatives, further fueling doubts about its feasibility. A critical issue is the country’s lagging innovation capacity. Despite allocating funds to initiatives like the Research and Development Impact Fund and a national innovation program, the budget fails to outline concrete measures to foster innovation. Trinidad and Tobago ranks poorly in global innovation indices, with only a small percentage of firms engaged in innovative activities. The agricultural sector, identified as a key pillar for diversification, also faces significant challenges. Despite repeated incentives, agricultural output remains minimal, and food imports continue to rise. Sudama raises critical questions about the sector’s lack of scientific input, low youth participation, and underutilized resources. Without addressing these systemic issues, the budget’s proposed measures are unlikely to yield meaningful results. The budget’s ambitious goals, while commendable, appear disconnected from the economic realities and structural weaknesses that hinder sustainable growth.

  • UNC Senator: Healthcare for children, real jobs for adults

    UNC Senator: Healthcare for children, real jobs for adults

    In a spirited defense of the current administration’s policies, Dr. Natalie Chaitan-Maharaj, Parliamentary Secretary in the Ministry of the People, Social Development and Family Services, asserted that the government has significantly outperformed its PNM predecessor in addressing the needs of Trinidad and Tobago’s citizens. Speaking during the Senate budget debate on October 27, Chaitan-Maharaj highlighted a series of initiatives aimed at improving social welfare and economic stability. She criticized the former government for its failure to open the Couva Children’s Hospital for a decade and for voting against the Children’s Life Fund, sarcastically noting that their solution was to decriminalize cannabis for personal use. Chaitan-Maharaj also condemned the PNM for canceling the baby milk grant, a program introduced by the previous UNC government to aid single mothers in distress. She emphasized the current government’s commitment to the most vulnerable, citing the establishment of the National Therapeutic and Resource Centre (NTRC) to provide free therapy for disabled individuals on a larger scale than before. The Parliamentary Secretary accused the PNM of dismantling key educational programs, including the school laptop initiative and reducing allocations for school transport and scholarships. She revealed that the school textbook grant had plummeted from $133 million under the UNC to $33 million under the PNM, and the national school feeding program had seen a drastic reduction in daily meals provided. Chaitan-Maharaj also pointed out the decline in foreign exchange reserves from US$11.4 billion in 2015 to US$5.4 billion under the PNM. She defended the government’s budget projections based on oil and gas prices, dismissing claims of a hidden deficit as baseless fear-mongering. The bank levy and electricity surcharge were justified as measures targeting high earners to fund social programs without burdening the vulnerable. Chaitan-Maharaj announced the replacement of Cepep, URP, and reforestation programs with recruitment drives aimed at providing real job opportunities. She also highlighted the allocation of $5 million to establish a Women’s Health Fund to address period poverty, accompanied by educational programs on menstrual health. The Parliamentary Secretary concluded by outlining an ambitious pipeline of projects for fiscal 2026, all aligned with the National Child Policy, aimed at creating a safer and more empowered future for every child in Trinidad and Tobago.

  • Kamla chooses country before self

    Kamla chooses country before self

    In a decisive move to combat the escalating drug crisis, Kamla Persad-Bissessar, the Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago (TT), has aligned herself with the United States in its efforts to curb drug exportation from Venezuela. This strategic decision, though met with criticism from her Caribbean counterparts, underscores her commitment to prioritizing national security over political alliances.

    Persad-Bissessar’s stance comes amidst allegations that Venezuela has been using TT as a transit point for drug trafficking, exacerbating the country’s already high crime rates. After nearly a decade of deliberation, the Prime Minister has chosen to break away from the status quo, distancing herself from Venezuelan leaders Nicolás Maduro and Delcy Rodríguez. Instead, she has engaged with US officials, including Senator Marco Rubio, to formulate a collaborative plan to address the issue.

    Her decision has not been without controversy. Fellow members of the Caribbean Community (Caricom) have expressed disapproval, isolating her and criticizing her departure from the collective regional stance. This has led to TT losing Caricom’s support for a seat on the United Nations Security Council. However, Persad-Bissessar remains undeterred, viewing the fight against drug trafficking, gun violence, and human smuggling as paramount. Her unwavering dedication has become the cornerstone of her leadership, even at the cost of her political career.

    In essence, Prime Minister Persad-Bissessar has chosen to put her country’s safety and security above all else, demonstrating a rare willingness to sacrifice personal and political gains for the greater good.

  • PM: Caricom unreliable, chose Venezuela over Trinidad and Tobago

    PM: Caricom unreliable, chose Venezuela over Trinidad and Tobago

    In a recent televised statement on Crimewatch, Trinidad and Tobago (TT) Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar expressed her dissatisfaction with Caricom, accusing the regional body of favoring Venezuela over TT. Her remarks came shortly after Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez announced that Venezuela would cease energy collaboration with TT, citing alleged aggression due to the presence of a US anti-narcotics fleet in the region. Persad-Bissessar dismissed these claims, asserting that TT does not rely on Venezuelan gas and has diversified its economy through energy and non-energy projects. She also emphasized that TT would not be used as a US military base, despite ongoing joint training exercises with the US aimed at enhancing internal security. The Prime Minister further criticized Caricom for its perceived unreliability, particularly in addressing TT’s challenges with drug trafficking, gang violence, and human trafficking. She also announced plans to extend the state of emergency (SoE) initially declared in July, citing a significant reduction in the murder rate. Meanwhile, Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley condemned US military actions in the region, labeling them as extra-judicial killings and calling for adherence to international law. Persad-Bissessar concluded by offering support to TT students in Jamaica affected by Hurricane Melissa and mobilizing aid for the island nation.