标签： Trinidad and Tobago

In the wake of two powerful earthquakes that rocked central Venezuela last Wednesday, collapsing structures across the capital Caracas and driving up a growing death toll, Trinidad and Tobago’s Opposition Leader Pennelope Beckles has publicly voiced deep disappointment over the ruling government’s response to the unfolding humanitarian crisis.

Speaking at a press briefing hosted by the People’s National Movement (PNM) at the Opposition Leader’s Office in Port of Spain on Thursday, Beckles issued sharp criticism of an official statement released by the Ministry of Foreign and Caricom Affairs, labeling the document “insensitive” and openly questioning whether any senior official had reviewed and vetted the communication before it was made public.

The Opposition Leader extended formal condolences to the affected people and government of Venezuela, emphasizing that the death toll continues to climb as rescue teams pull more victims from the rubble of destroyed buildings. She stressed that moments of international humanitarian crisis demand a response rooted in compassion, solidarity, and clear leadership – standards she said the government’s current statement failed to meet.

Beckles argued that the ruling administration should have laid out the specific details of any assistance Trinidad and Tobago planned to offer to Venezuela immediately after the disaster, rather than releasing a vague, generic statement. She pointed out that other nations across the globe have already extended clear, direct offers of concrete aid to Venezuela, noting that as one of Venezuela’s closest geographic neighbors with a permanent diplomatic mission already operating in Caracas, Trinidad and Tobago is uniquely positioned to offer timely, meaningful support.

She called on the government to move beyond generic words of sympathy and immediately publish a transparent outline of the practical assistance the country is prepared to deploy to help Venezuela respond to the disaster and support its recovery efforts.

Trinidad and Tobago law enforcement has expanded an ongoing high-profile investigation with the addition of a third person taken into custody, authorities confirmed Thursday. As of late Thursday evening, Blue Waters Products Ltd founder Dominic Hadeed and his spouse Genevieve Hadeed remained in police custody following coordinated search and detention operations carried out one day prior.

The newly detained individual is a 69-year-old businesswoman based in Westmoorings, a residential and commercial community in western Trinidad. In an official public update released at 8:30 p.m. Thursday, the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service (TTPS) confirmed the third detention but declined to release her name or explicitly connect her to the investigation targeting the Hadeeds. The update referenced a prior June 24, 2026 statement confirming that two people had been taken into custody in Westmoorings on Wednesday, and unnamed police sources confirmed to local outlet Express that the two detention operations are directly linked.

“She is currently assisting with the ongoing investigative process and no charges have been laid,” the TTPS said of the Westmoorings businesswoman, noting she was taken into custody on Thursday. In line with standard police protocol for active investigations, the agency emphasized that being taken into custody for questioning is not equivalent to a finding of guilt, and no negative assumptions about any individual’s involvement should be drawn.

“The TTPS remains committed to ensuring that all investigative steps are conducted professionally, impartially, and with full respect for the legal and reputational rights of all individuals involved,” the statement read. “As this matter remains active, no further information can be disclosed at this time. The TTPS will continue to provide updates as appropriate and remains steadfast in its duty to uphold the rule of law.”

According to police sources who spoke to Express on condition of anonymity, investigative teams have already requested formal legal guidance to determine what, if any, criminal charges will be filed against Dominic and Genevieve Hadeed. No details about the potential charges or a timeline for concluding the investigative process have been released to the public.

The case has drawn public and political attention, with Opposition Leader Pennelope Beckles addressing questions about the detention during a Thursday press conference in Port of Spain. Beckles emphasized that the core priority of the process must be upholding due process and allowing the law to proceed without interference. She also noted that the investigation is unfolding against the backdrop of a currently active national state of emergency, echoing calls for the government to provide additional clarity on the case as it progresses, matching the opposition’s approach to all cases processed under the ongoing emergency declaration.

The investigation’s first public steps unfolded Wednesday morning, when a team of plainclothes and uniformed officers from a specialized TTPS unit arrived at the Hadeeds’ Westmoorings home to execute a judicially approved search warrant. Investigators seized multiple electronic devices during the search, including several laptops, and confirmed that devices belonging to the couple’s adult children were also taken as potential evidence.

Following the residential search, investigators accompanied Dominic Hadeed to his company’s business location in Trincity to conduct a second court-approved search as part of the ongoing enquiries. As of Thursday evening, it remained unclear whether investigators seized any additional evidence from the Trincity business site.

In Wednesday’s initial public statement, the TTPS clarified that all search and detention actions were carried out under valid search warrants issued by the Supreme Court of Judicature, and all operations remained strictly within legal bounds under judicial oversight. The agency repeated its reminder that the execution of search warrants and detainment of individuals for questioning are standard investigative procedures that do not indicate a pre-determination of wrongdoing. “No conclusions should be drawn regarding the status of any individual until investigations are completed and any evidence is properly assessed in accordance with due process,” the TTPS said.

A major political controversy has unfolded in Trinidad and Tobago this week, as Port of Spain South Member of Parliament and opposition figure Keith Scotland has issued a firm denial of any close association with Andre Monteil, former treasurer of the opposition People’s National Movement (PNM) and head of the now-defunct Flavorite Foods Ltd. The dispute centers on allegations of professional misconduct tied to a $2.4 million unpaid electricity debt owed by Flavorite Foods to the state-run Trinidad and Tobago Electricity Commission (T&TEC).

Speaking at an official PNM press conference hosted at the Office of the Leader of the Opposition in Port of Spain, Scotland pushed back against multiple claims leveled by Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar, who first raised accusations of collusion and improper conduct last week during parliamentary debate. Persad-Bissessar has alleged Scotland, who is a trained barrister, and members of his former legal chambers acted negligently to pursue a so-called “phantom lawsuit” over the outstanding debt, allowing the claim to become statute-barred through false procedural misrepresentations to protect Monteil. The Prime Minister has already ordered a formal probe by the national Fraud Squad and backed T&TEC’s planned legal action against the MP.

Scotland has consistently maintained he has done nothing wrong in the case. Responding to T&TEC’s recently issued pre-action protocol letter threatening formal litigation, Scotland confirmed he has already received the document and will instruct his legal team to mount a formal response. He also criticized the unauthorized leak of the confidential legal letter, noting that the document was circulated to every major media outlet in the country almost immediately after it was delivered, before the ink on the correspondence was even dry. He confirmed he will treat the legal and political allegations against him with the full seriousness and gravity they demand.

Addressing the core claim of a close personal and professional tie to Monteil, Scotland told reporters that he has only met the former PNM official once in his entire life, in a passing, casual setting. “There is absolutely no relationship between myself and Andre Monteil,” Scotland insisted to assembled journalists.

On the procedural claims around the debt recovery lawsuit, Scotland presented official stamped court documentation to back up his assertion that the claim was properly refiled, that an entry of default judgment was correctly processed, and that the matter is currently awaiting a routine query from the court registrar. He also noted that national public health emergency provisions enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic had legally suspended statutory limitation periods for civil claims, invalidating the claim that the debt had become unrecoverable through procedural fault.

Scotland further clarified that he voluntarily suspended his private legal practice when he joined the national Cabinet in July 2024, separating his professional legal work from his political duties.

In the most high-profile rebuke to the Prime Minister, Scotland issued a repeated public challenge to Persad-Bissessar, calling on her to repeat the damaging allegations she made against him in the protected chamber of parliament in a public setting outside the legislature, where he would be able to pursue legal redress for defamation.

The Trinidad and Tobago Electricity Commission (T&TEC), the country’s state-owned power utility, has formally initiated pre-legal action against Port of Spain South Member of Parliament Keith Scotland, a senior counsel, and associate attorney Keisha Kydd-Hannibal, alleging professional misconduct that led to the permanent loss of more than $2.39 million in outstanding public funds.

The pre-action protocol letter, delivered Monday by Freedom Law Chambers led by Senior Counsel Anand Ramlogan, outlines multiple legal claims against the two legal professionals, including professional negligence, breach of client contract, fraudulent and negligent misstatement, and intentional deceit. The proposed lawsuit stems from T&TEC’s years-long failed effort to recover $2,392,220.11 in unpaid electricity bills from local food manufacturing firm Flavorite Foods Ltd.

Under the terms of the letter, T&TEC is seeking full compensatory damages equal to the total value of the unrecoverable debt, plus accrued interest, all accumulated legal costs, and compensation for additional related losses. The utility has also signaled it will pursue aggravated and exemplary damages to address the gravity of the alleged misconduct.

The controversy first became public earlier this October, when Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar addressed the allegations from the floor of Parliament. During her address, the Prime Minister accused Scotland of mishandling the debt recovery litigation, confirmed that the state utility would pursue formal legal action, and announced the matter would be referred to the national Fraud Squad for criminal investigation. She also noted that disciplinary proceedings before the Trinidad and Tobago Law Association could be launched against the attorneys in the coming weeks.

Shortly after the parliamentary announcement, Scotland spoke to reporters outside the legislative chamber and denied all wrongdoing, challenging the Prime Minister to repeat her accusations outside of Parliament, where she is protected by parliamentary privilege that shields her from defamation claims. “I invite the Prime Minister to make these claims outside of the Parliament,” Scotland stated at the time.

He has consistently maintained that court proceedings were properly initiated against Flavorite Foods, and has produced official court documents that he says confirm his team followed all required procedures. Scotland has also forcefully rejected unconfirmed suggestions that he maintained an improper personal or professional relationship with Flavorite chairman Louis André Monteil, calling collusion allegations baseless and gravely damaging to his reputation.

When reached for comment Monday following the delivery of the pre-action letter, Scotland declined to make any additional public statement, noting only that he would respond to all allegations fully through his own legal team.

The 17-page pre-action letter, drafted by Freedom Law Chambers attorney Ganesh Saroop, centers on three separate lawsuits filed against Flavorite Foods between 2022 and 2024, none of which have resulted in a final court judgment against the indebted company. T&TEC alleges that the first two claims were never properly advanced through the court system and were ultimately struck from the docket, while the third lawsuit was filed without the utility’s knowledge, formal authorization, or required court approval.

“Three claims were commenced, and not one was brought to judgment,” the letter notes, outlining the breakdown of the litigation process. For months, T&TEC leaders say they were repeatedly assured by the two attorneys that default judgment applications had been submitted to the court and were just awaiting administrative processing from court officials. But internal checks and official court confirmation revealed that no such applications had ever been filed with the court.

“The court records, and the Registrar’s own confirmations, establish that no request or application for default judgment was ever filed in either the 2022 or the 2023 claim,” the letter states. “T&TEC was thus led to believe that the delay lay with the administration of the Court, when its true cause was the failure of its own attorneys to take the most basic procedural steps.” Due to these procedural delays and missteps, the statute of limitations has now expired on the debt, leaving it permanently unrecoverable, T&TEC argues.

The timeline of the retainer traces back to October 2022, when T&TEC hired Scotland, who was then practicing through Virtus Chambers, to pursue the unpaid debt after Flavorite Foods failed to respond to an initial pre-action demand letter. Per the retainer agreement, T&TEC says Kydd-Hannibal was assigned to manage most day-to-day correspondence and litigation logistics, while Scotland served as lead counsel and provided strategic guidance on the case.

The utility alleges the first claim, filed in December 2022, was never properly served on Flavorite Foods and automatically expired per court rules. A second claim, filed in October 2023, suffered the same fatal procedural flaws, according to the complaint. Throughout 2024, T&TEC says Kydd-Hannibal repeatedly updated the utility that the default judgment application had been filed and was awaiting review from the Registrar of the Supreme Court.

In one January 2024 message included as evidence in the letter, Kydd-Hannibal allegedly wrote: “Yes it was, the Clerk is following up with the counter.” A later update claimed the application was “before the Registrar for consideration.” T&TEC confirms these statements are false, as court records show no application was ever submitted.

Most notably, the utility alleges that a third claim was filed in T&TEC’s name on October 22, 2024, without required authorization from T&TEC’s corporate secretary or board of directors. The letter also directs sharp criticism at Scotland for continuing to advise on the case after his appointment to the national Cabinet in July 2024, raising questions about compliance with parliamentary and ethical standards for sitting cabinet members. T&TEC says it will present evidence that Scotland continued to shape litigation strategy, recommended withdrawing and refiling a previous application, and even communicated directly with a court Registrar regarding the case, despite his cabinet position.

Both Scotland and Kydd-Hannibal have been given a 28-day window to respond to the pre-action letter, requiring them to explicitly state whether they admit or deny liability and address each allegation outlined in the document. T&TEC has warned that if a satisfactory response addressing all claims is not received within the timeframe, formal civil proceedings will be launched immediately without further notice, and additional disciplinary complaints will be filed with legal regulatory bodies.

A recent independent legal analysis prepared by a senior University of the West Indies academic has cast serious doubt over the legal standing of Caricom Secretary-General Carla Barnett’s second term, arguing that the reappointment process violated core articles of the Caribbean bloc’s foundational governing treaty.

Rajendra Ramlogan, a professor of commercial and environmental law based at UWI’s St. Augustine campus in Trinidad and Tobago, released the formal legal opinion this week. In the document, he clarified that his critique targets procedural flaws in the reappointment process, not Barnett herself, focusing narrowly on whether the regional body followed the constitutional mandates laid out in the Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas.

Barnett’s second five-year term was approved during a closed-door, heads-of-government-only retreat held in Nevis, which took place after the conclusion of the 50th Regular Meeting of the Caricom Conference of Heads of Government in February. Ramlogan’s core argument holds that this closed retreat does not qualify as a legally constituted meeting of the full Conference, and therefore lacked the legal authority to make a formal appointment to the Secretary-General post.

The opinion highlights two key treaty violations. First, it cites Article 11(2) of the Revised Treaty, which guarantees every member state’s head of government the right to appoint an alternate minister or representative to attend Conference meetings when the head is unable to attend. Ramlogan notes that this right was entirely sidelined during the Nevis retreat: attendance was restricted exclusively to sitting heads of government, blocking designated alternates from participating. The case of Trinidad and Tobago illustrates this breach: after Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar left the main summit early, Foreign and Caricom Affairs Minister Sean Sobers stepped in as the country’s acting head of delegation, but was barred from the retreat. Multiple other member states whose heads could not attend the retreat faced identical restrictions on their designated representatives.

While Ramlogan acknowledges that Caricom’s internal rules allow for closed heads-only deliberations in informal settings, he emphasizes that such caucuses cannot exercise formal treaty-mandated decision-making authority. “A heads-only caucus may be lawful as a deliberative setting,” Ramlogan wrote, “but a heads-only caucus cannot become the final decision-maker where the Conference is exercising a formal Revised Treaty function.”

Second, the opinion finds the process failed to meet the requirements laid out in Article 24 of the treaty, which mandates that the Secretary-General must be appointed by the Conference of Heads only after receiving a formal recommendation from the Community Council of Ministers. Ramlogan rejected the claim that reappointment of an incumbent Secretary-General is exempt from this requirement, noting that a second term constitutes an entirely new grant of authority after the expiration of the first fixed five-year term. Since the Community Council was never consulted and never issued a recommendation, the process undermined the treaty’s designed balance of institutional power.

The opinion also raises additional red flags: it questions unconfirmed reports that the decision was approved via majority vote rather than the consensus normally required for Caricom decisions, and points out that the official post-summit communiqué made no mention of Barnett’s reappointment at all.

In his closing summary, Ramlogan confirmed that the heads-only attendance restriction directly violated the Revised Treaty by stripping member states like Trinidad and Tobago of their legally guaranteed participation rights. The exclusion of designated alternate representatives, he concluded, renders Barnett’s reappointment “constitutionally defective and potentially void.”

As the Port of Spain Corporation commemorates its 112th year of municipal governance, the capital city’s top elected official has opened up about the persistent systemic challenges holding back progress, with violent crime and chronic budget shortages topping the list of urgent concerns.

Mayor Chinua Alleyne shared these observations during a celebratory cocktail reception held Wednesday at Port of Spain’s City Hall on Knox Street, marking the institution’s more than a century of public service.

Despite ongoing efforts to turn the tide on public safety, Alleyne acknowledged that the city has not yet overcome its most pressing issues. “There is still critical work ahead of us,” he noted, describing crime as a burden he bears personally for the community. He stressed that the city’s own municipal police force has gone above and beyond the call of duty, volunteering extra hours to boost patrols and public safety outreach, and continues to deliver strong results for residents. The city maintains close collaboration with the national Trinidad and Tobago Police Service (TTPS), and Alleyne reaffirmed that this partnership would remain a top priority moving forward.

On the financial side, Alleyne and the municipal council are waiting on the Ministry of Finance to release urgently needed allocated funds, with expectations pinned on the upcoming national Mid-Year Budget Review to unlock critical support. Additional funding, he said, would allow the council to expand its work across more neighborhoods and advance long-overdue city modernization projects. Alleyne also teased that he would share full details of his ambitious agenda for citywide beautification and infrastructure upgrades at the upcoming Statutory Meeting and Civic Awards reception scheduled for Friday.

This is not the first time Alleyne has sounded the alarm about budget gaps. Back in April, he warned that severe funding shortages threatened to disrupt core municipal services, including regular residential garbage collection, and could even leave municipal workers without scheduled pay checks.

The 112th anniversary celebrations extended beyond the City Hall reception, including an interfaith service held at the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception on Port of Spain’s Independence Square. Addressing the multi-religious gathering, Local Government Minister Khadijah Ameen urged Alleyne and the municipal council to stay the course in their service to Port of Spain’s residents.

“As elected representatives, our core mission is to stand for the people we serve,” Ameen told attendees. She acknowledged that local government work is often uncompensated in public recognition, noting “I know at times it can be a thankless job — decades from now, many residents may not recall our names. But that does not diminish our responsibility to serve with excellence and distinction. Our calling is to lift up the lives of the most vulnerable among us.” Ameen also highlighted that local officials are always the first responders to community crises, from violent tragedies to natural disasters, making their consistent, dedicated service all the more critical.

Ameen closed her remarks by sharing the guidance of Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar, who encourages public servants to “put God first and walk behind” in their work, before offering a blessing for the council and the city.

She also reflected on the unique cultural and religious pluralism that defines Trinidad and Tobago, noting that the multi-faith gathering in a Roman Catholic cathedral was a powerful testament to that legacy. “It is a special gift to live in a country where people of every religious tradition can gather in one another’s places of worship — whether churches, mandirs, or mosques,” she said. “In too many parts of the world, this kind of interfaith gathering is impossible, even deadly. This is what makes our beautiful, cosmopolitan nation so special.”