A significant diplomatic development has triggered an unexpected confrontation between current and former national security officials in Trinidad and Tobago. The installation of a controversial US military radar system in Tobago has ignited a fierce public dispute between Homeland Security Minister Roger Alexander and former Police Commissioner Gary Griffith.
The conflict emerged following Minister Alexander’s remarks regarding the radar’s purported role in resolving the kidnapping case involving Derek Tardieu and his wife Clarabelle. Griffith, who served as both police commissioner and national security minister, condemned these statements as “irresponsible” in a December 11 Facebook post, expressing concern that such disclosures could alert criminal elements to state surveillance capabilities.
Minister Alexander mounted a vigorous defense through a December 12 interview with the Guardian newspaper, asserting his comments were taken out of context. He questioned the expertise of critics who “never was in a war” but positioned themselves as security authorities through academic knowledge alone.
The exchange escalated dramatically when Griffith, highlighting his military background spanning from 1988 to 1999, released a nine-minute video recounting his operational experience in conflict zones including the UK, Haiti, and during Trinidad and Tobago’s 1990 attempted coup. He delivered a particularly cutting remark suggesting Minister Alexander’s only known conflict was “against a dictionary.”
In an unconventional response, Minister Alexander produced an ankle monitor during an office video recording, claiming he purchased it specifically for Griffith. “It’s really an ankle bracelet for your mouth,” Alexander stated while brandishing the device. “Cause that’s all you does do – talk, talk, talk, talk, talk. Your name should be Gary the parrot.”
The extraordinary public feud between these security officials has drawn attention to the increasingly contentious debate surrounding the US military presence in Tobago, raising questions about professional conduct within the highest levels of national security leadership.









