标签： Suriname

The global competition for influence over the international financial system has entered a new phase, as the expanding BRICS bloc advances an initiative to streamline intra-bloc cross-border payments and reduce reliance on Western-dominated financial infrastructure. During the 18th BRICS Summit held in New Delhi on 12 and 13 September, bloc leaders formally backed further development of local currency trade mechanisms and cross-border payment systems, highlighting the strategic role of BRICS Pay, a project led by the BRICS Business Council. First proposed in 2018, BRICS Pay is designed as a digital payment and settlement ecosystem that connects existing national payment systems across member states, aiming to make cross-border transactions faster, more affordable, and less vulnerable to external geopolitical pressure. Contrary to widespread speculation, the initiative is not positioned as an immediate full replacement for the SWIFT global financial messaging network, or major Western card networks like Visa and Mastercard; instead, it operates as a complementary alternative infrastructure that works alongside existing global systems. There are also no current plans to launch a single centralized BRICS payment system or a common BRICS currency, a distinction that reflects the divergent economic and geopolitical priorities across the bloc’s 11 current members.

To understand the urgency behind BRICS Pay, one must look at the shifting geopolitical landscape of recent years, which has turned financial infrastructure into a core tool of international statecraft. Western sanctions imposed after Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine cut off major Russian financial institutions from the SWIFT network, exposing the profound risks emerging economies face when critical components of their international financial infrastructure are controlled by external powers. For Russia, the exclusion made clear how dependent even large economies are on systems outside their sovereign control, and Moscow has since become a leading advocate for alternative payment arrangements and expanded use of national currencies in intra-bloc trade. But the push for alternatives extends far beyond Russia: many emerging market economies across BRICS have growing concerns over the concentration of control over global financial infrastructure in a small group of Western nations and institutions.

A common misconception about BRICS is that it acts as a unified geopolitical and economic bloc with a single shared financial agenda. In reality, member states hold widely divergent interests, shaped by their unique trade relationships, existing financial systems, currency policies, and diplomatic ties to Western powers and the U.S. dollar. For example, India maintains deep economic and strategic ties with both Western nations and fellow BRICS members, while Brazil’s policy priorities differ sharply from Russia’s, and China already operates a robust cross-border payment infrastructure of its own. This diversity rules out a fully centralized, one-size-fits-all BRICS payment system in the near term. Instead, the bloc is pursuing a more pragmatic model: an interoperable network that links existing independent national payment systems, rather than building an entirely new centralized system from scratch.

Manoj Kewalramani, chair of the Geostrategy Programme at Indian think tank Takshashila Institution, framed the initiative to Al Jazeera as an iterative exploration of tools to reduce the vulnerability of intra-BRICS trade and financial ties, rather than a direct challenge to the existing global order. At its core, the development of BRICS Pay touches on a fundamental geopolitical question: who controls the infrastructure that underpins global trade and international financial transactions?

How does BRICS Pay work in practice? The core premise is that each member state retains its existing domestic payment infrastructure, while BRICS Pay builds the technical bridges to enable these separate systems to communicate with one another, via tools like QR codes, digital wallets, and mobile applications. For consumers, this could mean a traveler from India visiting Brazil would be able to use their existing Indian payment infrastructure directly, rather than relying on international card networks or traditional cross-border payment services. The same model applies to business and banking transactions: an Indian firm trading with a Chinese partner could settle transactions directly in their respective national currencies via connected domestic systems, arranged through agreements between their financial institutions.

Andrey Mikhaylishin, CEO of BRICS Pay, pointed to existing cutting-edge national systems as the building blocks for the network, including India’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI) and RuPay, Russia’s Mir card network and Fast Payment System. Currently, these advanced national systems operate in isolation: an Indian payment app does not work automatically in China, a Brazilian domestic network cannot connect seamlessly to Russian banks, and China’s infrastructure does not natively interoperate with India’s. BRICS Pay’s core mission is to close these gaps.

Many member states already operate world-class national payment systems that can serve as a foundation for the expanded network:
– India’s UPI is one of the most advanced instant payment systems globally, enabling fast person-to-person and business-to-consumer transactions directly from bank accounts. While it dominates domestic retail payments and has been rolled out in a small number of partner countries, its role in facilitating large-scale international trade remains limited for now.
– Brazil’s Pix is another wildly popular instant payment system that has rapidly become a core part of the country’s domestic payment ecosystem. Like UPI, its main gap is the lack of established international interoperability. A successful domestic system does not automatically translate to a functional global payment network.
– China’s Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) is a dedicated infrastructure for cross-border renminbi payments. It is important to note that CIPS does not fill the exact same role as SWIFT: CIPS handles the processing and settlement of cross-border renminbi transactions, while SWIFT is primarily a secure messaging network that allows financial institutions to exchange payment instructions and transaction information.

This distinction is critical for anyone comparing BRICS Pay to SWIFT. The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) is not a global settlement system that moves money between accounts itself. Instead, it is a standardized, secure messaging network used by more than 11,000 financial institutions worldwide to exchange transaction information. Its massive scale, built up over decades of operation, creates a self-reinforcing network effect: the more institutions that join SWIFT, the more valuable the network becomes for every user. Beyond technology, SWIFT represents a decades-old global framework of trust, standardized rules, regulation, and financial relationships that cannot be easily replaced overnight.

In their joint declaration from the New Delhi summit, BRICS leaders emphasized the need to prioritize national sovereign priorities, noting that no universal solution exists for all member states. BRICS Pay is also open to use by friendly non-BRICS countries, expanding its potential reach over time. For now, the initiative remains a work in progress, focused on incremental connection of existing systems rather than a sudden overhaul of the global financial order.

On September 16, 2026, China officially opened the Pinglu Canal, a landmark infrastructure project that marks the country’s first nationally planned and constructed modern river-sea waterway. Stretching 134.2 kilometers across the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region in southern China, the canal directly connects Nanning, the capital of Guangxi, to the Beibu Gulf, creating the closest access to the ocean for China’s landlocked southwestern interior and cutting more than 560 kilometers off the traditional trading route through Guangdong Province.

With a total construction investment of 72.7 billion yuan (approximately 10.75 billion U.S. dollars), the project took just over four years to complete. Engineers overcame significant technical hurdles, most notably a 65-meter elevation difference across the canal’s length—roughly the height of a 20-story building—by building three double-chamber lock complexes to accommodate vessels up to 5,000 deadweight tons. The project set four global engineering records: the strongest shipping capacity among comparable canals worldwide, the fastest lock operation for similar waterways, the largest water level difference for a water-saving lock, and the world’s largest water-saving inland waterway lock. Environmental sustainability was integrated into construction from the start: more than 98% of the 315 million cubic meters of excavated earth and rock was reused, and the canal includes a 480-meter fish passage as well as a dedicated crossing for local terrestrial wildlife such as leopard cats and squirrels.

The Pinglu Canal is a core component of China’s New International Land-Sea Trade Corridor, a strategic initiative linking China’s inland regions to ASEAN and global markets. On opening day, 30 cargo vessels transited the new waterway, and two new shipping routes were launched: the international Nanning-Can Tho (Vietnam) route and the domestic Nanning-Yangpu (Hainan) route. Four additional passenger routes were also opened alongside the cargo lanes, with initial shipments including containers, bulk construction materials, coal, ore, steel, and fertilizer.

Ding Xuexiang, a member of the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and Vice Premier of the State Council, attended the opening ceremony in Qinzhou and emphasized that the completion of the canal creates an opportunity to develop the Beibu Gulf Port into a world-class international trade gateway and expand opening-up in western China. As a critical multi-modal infrastructure hub integrating water transport, rail, and maritime shipping, Ding noted that the Pinglu Canal must leverage its unique advantages in coordinating land-sea connections and linking domestic and international markets to operate as a safe and efficient “golden waterway” between China’s interior and the ocean.

The opening of the canal comes in the first year of China’s 15th Five-Year Plan (2026-2030), a period in which the world’s second-largest economy has prioritized more balanced regional development and expanded high-quality opening-up. For southwest China, a region that has long lagged behind the more prosperous eastern coast and faced high logistics costs for accessing ocean ports, the Pinglu Canal marks a transformative shift. It is projected to cut annual transportation costs by more than 5 billion yuan and reduce overall logistics costs by between 18% and 30% for regional trade.

China-ASEAN trade has grown rapidly in recent years, surpassing 1 trillion U.S. dollars for the first time in 2025. In the first seven months of 2026 alone, bilateral trade reached 744.41 billion U.S. dollars, a 24.7% year-on-year increase that accounts for 21.8% of China’s total foreign trade. Industry analysts note that the value of the Pinglu Canal extends far beyond just reduced shipping distance.

“The real impact lies in how much the canal can cut overall logistics costs, reduce travel time variability, and lower supply chain uncertainty across the entire China-ASEAN trade network,” explained Boonsub Panichakarn, a scholar from the Faculty of Logistics and Digital Supply Chain at Thailand’s Naresuan University. Lu Xinning, vice chairman of the Pinglu Canal project, added that the waterway creates a new direct connection between China’s 1.4-billion-consumer market and ASEAN’s nearly 700 million consumers, with benefits extending beyond just goods trade to encourage cross-border investment and deeper integration of regional supply chains.

Looking ahead, the canal is expected to reshape regional trade flows in the near term, shifting some cargo volume from road and rail to water transport and redirecting traffic from the Pearl River Delta to the Beibu Gulf. Over the long term, lower access costs to ocean trade are projected to attract new investment to southwest China’s interior and reshape the industrial layout along the canal. The Beibu Gulf Port has already seen rapid growth in capacity, with container throughput rising from just 2.28 million TEU in 2017 to around 10 million TEU in 2025. Analysts project that the Pinglu Canal will add an estimated 3.5 million tons of additional cargo throughput in its early years of operation, rising to as much as 150 million tons annually over the long term.

The global economy is currently navigating a dangerous confluence of overlapping risks, from spiking financing costs and surging crude oil prices to growing geopolitical tensions that threaten to rip apart the established multilateral trading system. The World Trade Organization (WTO) has issued an urgent new warning that accelerating fragmentation of global trade could result in trillions of dollars in cumulative economic losses across the globe, even as bond markets in major economies signal mounting pressure from high interest rates and persistent inflation concerns.

Yields on 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds have now climbed above the 5% threshold, matching multi-year highs for borrowing costs seen across most other major advanced economies. According to industry reports, average financing costs for leading industrialized nations have reached levels not seen in decades, driven by persistent market anxiety over stubborn inflation, expanding government budget deficits, and the likelihood that major central banks will keep interest rates elevated for an extended period to bring price growth under control.

Compounding these financial market pressures is a sharp recent rally in global crude oil prices. On Tuesday, benchmark Brent crude traded above $107 per barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude also crossed the $100 per barrel mark. The renewed run-up in energy costs has reignited fears that inflation will remain stickier than policymakers and investors currently expect, potentially forcing further monetary tightening that would push borrowing costs even higher.

Higher sovereign bond yields ripple out across every corner of the global economy, pushing up borrowing costs for nearly all participants. Governments face higher interest expenses when issuing new debt or refinancing maturing obligations, while business loans and consumer credit products from mortgages to auto loans also grow more expensive. Countries with high debt loads or large ongoing refinancing needs are disproportionately exposed to this pressure, leaving them vulnerable to fiscal strain in the coming months.

Against this unstable macroeconomic backdrop, the WTO used its newly released 2026 World Trade Report to sound the alarm on a second, longer-term threat to global growth: the split of the global trading system into competing geopolitical and economic blocs. The organization emphasized that the current multilateral trading framework is at a critical crossroads, as it has failed to evolve quickly enough to keep pace with seismic shifts in the global economy, including changing global power balances, rising state intervention in markets, rapid digitalization, and escalating geopolitical frictions that have eroded cooperation.

The potential economic damage from full fragmentation is staggering. WTO economists modeled two plausible fragmentation scenarios, and both project deep global output losses. In a scenario where the world splits into two geopolitically aligned trading blocs, global gross domestic product (GDP) would be 5.1% lower than a baseline scenario of continued existing cooperation, while global exports would drop by 18.6% relative to the baseline.

The harm is even more severe in a second scenario where nearly all multilateral trade cooperation is replaced by a fragmented web of disconnected bilateral and regional free trade agreements. Under that outcome, global GDP would fall by 6.9% compared to the baseline, and global exports would contract by 26.9%. In contrast, the WTO projects that strengthening and reforming the multilateral trading system would deliver significant net gains: by 2050, global GDP would be 2.9% higher than the baseline, and global exports would expand by 17.9% if cooperation is reinforced.

Smaller and lower-income economies face the most disproportionate risk from further erosion of the multilateral system, the WTO found. These nations typically lack the economic and geopolitical heft to negotiate favorable bilateral trade terms on their own, so they rely heavily on the rule-based multilateral framework to guarantee equal access to global markets. In a world where bilateral power dynamics dominate trade relations, these vulnerable economies would suffer far larger relative losses than larger, more powerful economies.

Taken together, the latest bond market movements and the WTO’s warning lay bare two overlapping vulnerabilities facing the global economy today. In the short term, elevated oil prices, persistent inflation, and rising interest rates are driving up financing costs for governments, businesses and households worldwide, squeezing spending and investment. Over the longer term, growing geopolitical polarization and accelerating trade fragmentation will put additional sustained downward pressure on international trade and global economic growth.

For small, open economies that depend heavily on international trade, energy imports and access to global capital markets, these two sets of risks are especially consequential. Higher global interest rates directly raise their borrowing costs, while disrupted trade flows and sustained high energy prices push up import costs and feed through to higher domestic inflation, creating a toxic mix of challenges for policymakers to address.