A landmark ruling from the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) in the high-profile case *Derek Anand Ramsamooj v. State of Suriname* (CCJ No. TTOJ2024/001) has emerged as one of the most consequential supranational rule-of-law decisions for Suriname’s legal practice, according to a detailed legal analysis published by legal commentator mr. Kintamanie Ramdhan in the 2026 second issue of the Dutch-language legal journal *SJB*. Legal scholar Carlo Jadnanansing has further contextualized the far-reaching implications of this ruling for regional legal standards within the CARICOM community.
标签： Suriname
苏里南
-
Gewapende rovers lossen schoten bij beroving aan Patatastraat
On October 22 at 17:17 local time, a violent armed robbery unfolded at a location on Patatastraat within the Kwatta resort area, leaving local law enforcement searching for two masked perpetrators. According to official police briefings, the two assailants were both armed with handguns and discharged multiple rounds during the course of the robbery. After threatening the victim and opening fire, the robbers fled the scene with a stolen gold necklace, one of the most high-value items taken during the incident.
Police spokesperson confirmed that the two suspects left the area on a blue Dayang-brand motorbike. Unfortunately, investigators have not yet obtained the license plate number for the two-wheeled vehicle, creating an early hurdle in identifying and locating the perpetrators. As of the latest update, authorities have not released any information regarding whether members of the public or the victim suffered injuries during the robbery. The case has been formally registered with local police, and an active investigation is currently underway to track down the suspects and recover the stolen property.
-
Zuidoost-Azië wil vervuilers door bosbranden aanpakken
Southeast Asia is grappling with one of its worst transboundary haze crises in more than a decade, fueled by rampant peat and forest fires across Indonesia that have choked major urban centers in neighboring Singapore and Malaysia, triggering mounting calls to hold responsible companies legally accountable for the cross-border pollution. The unfolding disaster has also put long-standing regional cooperation frameworks under the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to the test, revealing critical gaps in enforcement that have undermined decades of agreed-upon anti-haze commitments.
The current blazes have been amplified by prolonged drought conditions amplified by the El Niño weather phenomenon, creating tinder-dry conditions across Indonesia’s major forested regions in Sumatra and Kalimantan. As toxic smoke drifts across national borders, it has severely degraded air quality across a wide swathe of the region, triggering widespread public health concerns, disrupting daily life, and obscuring iconic city skylines from Kuala Lumpur to Singapore’s central business district.
Singapore has emerged as the first government to ramp up concrete legal action against linked entities, ramping up pressure under its 2014 Transboundary Haze Pollution Act. On October 19, the country’s National Environment Agency (NEA) announced it would impose mandatory preventive measures on three additional Indonesian companies linked to fires burning within their concession areas. Authorities confirmed there is evidence that smoke from these properties has reached Singapore’s territory. This brings the total number of Indonesian firms targeted by Singaporean regulators to 10, following an initial notification of seven companies earlier in the crisis.
Under the required measures, the companies must deploy dedicated firefighting teams to extinguish existing blazes on their land, stop any slash-and-burn clearing activities, and submit formal prevention plans to stop new fires from breaking out. Companies found guilty of violating the law face fines of up to S$100,000 per day, capped at a total of S$2 million, and non-compliance with preventive orders carries additional legal penalties. Importantly, Singaporean authorities emphasize the notifications do not equal a finding of guilt, and successful prosecution requires robust evidence connecting the companies directly to the blazes and resulting pollution. To date, Singapore has never secured a conviction under the 2014 law, with investigations into companies linked to the devastating 2015 haze crisis still ongoing in some cases.
Indonesia’s national government has also pledged to crack down on fire starters, with President Prabowo Subianto ordering the country’s national police, public prosecutor’s office, and ministry of forestry to launch full investigations into suspected corporate and individual involvement in starting the blazes. As of the latest updates, Indonesian authorities have named 223 individuals and 9 companies as suspects across 273 open fire-related police cases, covering a total burned area of more than 5,150 hectares. As with Singapore’s process, suspect status does not equal a finding of guilt, with ongoing investigations working to determine who is responsible for starting the blazes and whether any criminal violations have occurred. President Prabowo has previously stated that companies proven responsible for the fires will face revocation of their operating concessions, noting the government has zero tolerance for intentional arson and other activities that threaten the country’s forest and land reserves.
At the same time, Indonesia has deployed a massive emergency response to contain the ongoing blazes: more than 69,000 firefighters and support personnel have been mobilized, supported by roughly 50 aircraft conducting water bombing and cloud seeding operations to trigger rain. While official data shows a decline in the number of active hotspots and total emissions in the week leading up to October 21, authorities warn the situation remains volatile, with existing hotspots at risk of reigniting and new fires easily breaking out under continued dry conditions.
The crisis has once again drawn attention to the critical weaknesses of ASEAN’s existing regional framework to address transboundary haze. All 11 ASEAN member states signed the Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution back in 2002, a legally binding pact that requires member states to work collaboratively to tackle haze causes and mitigate impacts. However, the agreement lacks any independent judicial body with the authority to directly penalize non-compliant nations or companies, and all disputes over interpretation and implementation must be resolved through diplomatic negotiation. As a result, enforcement remains almost entirely dependent on national legislation and the willingness of individual governments to cooperate, with ASEAN’s long-standing principle of non-interference in internal affairs further limiting action.
Environmental groups and legal experts have repeatedly called for the regional framework to be strengthened with independent monitoring, clearer compliance protocols, and formal mechanisms to hold corporate actors accountable. They note that while diplomatic dialogue and emergency response measures are necessary, they are insufficient to address the root of the problem, which is tied to powerful economic interests driving deforestation, land clearing, and the widespread use of fire to clear land for agricultural development.
One of the biggest practical barriers to successful prosecution is the challenge of proving a specific company is responsible for a blaze that caused haze pollution in a neighboring country. While satellite imagery, meteorological data, and concession maps can help trace the origin of fires, criminal convictions require additional evidence linking specific companies or individuals to the ignition of the blaze, and confirming the fire started within the company’s concession area. Companies often argue that fires started outside their concessions and spread onto their land, creating further evidentiary complexity. This makes close cooperation with Indonesian authorities critical, as foreign investigators need access to on-the-ground evidence and local data to build a viable legal case. While Singapore’s law also allows civil claims from individuals and businesses harmed by the haze, legal action can also trigger diplomatic tensions: in 2016, a dispute erupted between Singapore and Indonesia after Singapore attempted to summon an Indonesian corporate executive for questioning related to a previous haze event.
Despite the recent drop in active hotspots, the broader regional situation remains concerning. ASEAN’s specialized meteorological center still reports high numbers of active hotspots across parts of Sumatra and Kalimantan, and transboundary smoke continues to be detected in parts of Malaysia and Singapore. Long-term weather forecasts predict continued precipitation deficits across much of the region, with a projected strengthening of El Niño expected to worsen drought conditions and keep the risk of new fires elevated. While forecasters predict increased rainfall by the end of October that could bring some relief, there is no guarantee the haze will dissipate quickly.
Beyond environmental damage, the haze poses severe public health risks: toxic fine particulate matter in the smoke triggers and worsens respiratory conditions, with children, the elderly, and people with pre-existing health conditions facing the greatest risk.
Experts are now calling for a broader systemic approach that holds not only the companies that start fires accountable, but also the corporations that profit from deforested land and the financial institutions that fund these high-risk activities. Proposed reforms include stricter supply chain checks for palm oil and other agricultural commodities, expanded sustainability certification schemes, and meaningful penalties for companies that violate environmental regulations. Consumers can also drive change by avoiding products from companies with proven links to irresponsible fire-driven land clearing.
The 2024 haze crisis has laid bare a long-standing structural flaw in regional anti-haze efforts: while Southeast Asian nations have had formal agreements in place to tackle transboundary haze for more than 20 years, actual enforcement still lags far behind the scale of the ongoing problem.
-
Bestuurlijke continuïteit en het wettelijk kader bij de TAS
Suriname is currently facing a growing institutional crisis that tests the foundations of its rule of law and the proper functioning of independent administrative bodies, centered on recent leadership upheaval at the Telecommunicatie Autoriteit Suriname (TAS), the country’s national telecommunications regulator. Legal expert Floyd F. Guillard argues that conflicts over the authority of a sitting director should never be allowed to disrupt the core operational functions of a critical national oversight body, and that careful adherence to existing legislation is the only way to maintain administrative stability and legal certainty for all stakeholders involved.
As a sui generis independent administrative body, TAS draws all of its governing authority directly from Suriname’s formal legislative framework. The organization’s exclusive legal foundation rests on two key documents: State Decree No. 32, issued on March 26, 1998, and the Telecommunications Facilities Act. Under Article 2, Paragraph 2 of the Telecommunications Facilities Act, the director’s term of office is legally fixed at five years, a timeline that is directly tied to the director’s public law function. Once this fixed term expires, the legal mandate to lead the organization and carry out legal acts on its behalf automatically lapses, according to Guillard’s analysis.
Guillard emphasizes that the argument that an administrative mandate can continue implicitly without a new formal appointment is incompatible with core principles of Suriname administrative law. The expiration of a fixed appointment term takes effect automatically with the passage of time, and no explicit revocation or separate decision from a competent authority is required to end the incumbent’s governing authority. This mechanism was intentionally built into the legislation by lawmakers to guarantee that all administrative mandates remain temporary, upholding the principle of rotational leadership in public institutions.
When a director’s authority expires and no successor has yet been formally appointed, a governing vacancy is created. To ensure the continuity of state operations, Suriname’s legislation already includes specific contingency provisions. Article 4, Paragraph 2 of the Telecommunications Facilities Act explicitly assigns the Board of Commissioners to assume governing responsibility in cases of incapacity or vacancy. This statutory assignment prevents an administrative vacuum and ensures that critical telecommunications oversight tasks can continue without interruption.
A review of the situation from a contract law perspective, measured against the Suriname Civil Code including the New Civil Code, reaches the same legal conclusion. A fixed-term agreement automatically ends once the agreed period expires, and an extension of the legal relationship can only occur when both parties explicitly express their intention to continue the arrangement. If the appointing authority or oversight body has indicated in a timely manner that it does not wish to extend the arrangement, implicit extension is legally excluded. While any claims regarding legal status can be raised in civil proceedings, such proceedings cannot restore a public law governing mandate that has already legally lapsed.
Guillard concludes that professional governance of any public agency requires strict adherence to legal boundaries. Transparency and adherence to the rule of law depend on decisions that rest on an unassailable legal foundation. Strict compliance with existing laws and regulations provides the only sustainable framework to resolve institutional conflicts and protect the public interest of a well-functioning telecommunications sector in Suriname.
-
Bukele dreigt Haïtiaanse bendes met hardere militaire actie
A high-stakes international crisis has unfolded in Haiti, where El Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele has ordered a full military rescue operation to free four of his country’s citizens, who are being held captive by armed gangs in the Caribbean nation. The abduction, which has put the global anti-gang mission in Haiti under intense scrutiny, comes amid years of spiraling violence and political instability in the country.
The four captives are air force technicians serving as part of the international Gang Suppression Force (GSF), the multinational security mission deployed to support Haitian security services in their campaign against powerful armed criminal groups that control large swathes of Haitian territory. Bukele publicly addressed the suspected kidnappers directly in a post on the social platform X on Wednesday, issuing a stark ultimatum: release the four hostages alive and unharmed, or face a far more aggressive military response from El Salvador.
“Today’s opening action is nothing compared to what will come if you do not release the four hostages alive,” Bukele warned in his statement, adding that gangs should not dismiss his warning as empty rhetoric. Drawing on his well-documented hardline crackdown on organized crime in his home country, Bukele emphasized: “We have already taken down gangs in El Salvador, and we can do the same to you.”
The four Salvadoran service members went missing on Sunday, October 18, after their armored vehicle came under heavy fire in the Santo neighborhood of Croix-des-Bouquets, a municipality on the outskirts of Haiti’s capital Port-au-Prince. The vehicle caught fire during the attack; the crew managed to escape the burning vehicle, but all contact was lost immediately after. Ever since, Salvadoran and international security forces have worked to locate the missing men, but their search efforts have been severely hampered by intense ongoing combat in the area.
Support helicopters sent to aid the search have also come under enemy fire, and neither ground nor aerial reconnaissance missions have yielded confirmed information about the captives’ condition or whereabouts to date. Bukele stressed that the Salvadoran contingent in the GSF is not a frontline combat unit, noting their core mission within the international deployment focuses on aviation support, medical evacuations, and saving lives.
For its part, the Haitian government has named the safe release of the four troops an absolute top priority. According to an official government statement, Haitian Prime Minister’s office held coordinating talks Wednesday to review ongoing intervention efforts and plan additional measures to strengthen rescue operations, in close collaboration with GSF leadership. As of Thursday, Haitian authorities have not released public confirmation that the four men are still alive, nor have they officially named which gang is responsible for the abduction. International security forces continue to operate in the attack zone, and local residents have been ordered to shelter in place amid continuing clashes.
The abduction marks one of the most severe attacks on the GSF since the mission launched, and represents a critical test of the international deployment’s ability to operate in gang-controlled territory. The GSF was established to back Haitian police as they attempt to retake control of areas dominated by armed groups that hold sway over most of Port-au-Prince and its surrounding regions. Multiple countries contribute personnel to the mission beyond El Salvador.
The incident underscores the extreme risks that international troops face in Haiti, where gangs have effectively restricted the movement of official security forces across large parts of the country. The rescue operation carries extra urgency as Haiti prepares to hold its first general election in more than a decade; persistent widespread insecurity remains one of the largest barriers to restoring state authority and running a credible, inclusive vote.
Haiti has been trapped in a deep security and political crisis for years, as armed gangs have expanded their influence through systematic killings, kidnappings, extortion, and targeted attacks on civilian populations and government institutions. United Nations data shows that thousands of people have been killed or injured in gang-related violence in the first months of 2026 alone, and nearly 1.5 million Haitians have been internally displaced by conflict in recent years. The attack zone near Port-au-Prince is known to be a stronghold for three of Haiti’s most powerful gangs: Chèn Méchan, Kraze Barye and 400 Mawozo. Senior leaders of all three groups are already subject to sanctions from the United Nations and the United States.
The Salvadoran government has not yet released additional operational details about the announced rescue mission, including whether the operation will be led exclusively by Salvadoran troops, or what level of additional support the broader GSF will provide. At this stage, locating the hostages and securing their safe return remains the immediate top priority for all involved parties.
-
Monorath krijgt 3 jaar voor voorbereiding uitvoering kinderbeschermingsverdragen
PARAMARIBO, Suriname – Suriname’s national legislature, the Nationale Assemblée (DNA), has approved legislation to adopt four international child protection conventions agreed at The Hague, with a three-year transition period for the government to complete organizational and legal preparations before the treaties enter into force. Justice and Security Minister Harish Monorath introduced an amendment during parliamentary debate that sets the delayed effective date, addressing lawmakers’ concerns about the country’s readiness to meet the conventions’ requirements while outlining plans to overhaul the nation’s family law regulatory body.
The four treaties cover cross-border issues critical to child welfare: international child abduction, intercountry adoption, parental responsibility and child protection, and the cross-border enforcement of child support payments. Once fully implemented, the agreements will strengthen legal protections for children and families when cross-border family law disputes arise. While the legislation received broad cross-party support in the DNA, passing with 30 unanimous votes, lawmakers raised pointed questions about government preparations, resource allocation, and the rationale for the three-year transition.
Under the new governance framework outlined by Minister Monorath, two existing state bodies will take on central coordinating roles. The Bureau for Family Law Affairs (BUFAZ) will act as the national central authority for the adoption, child support, and general child protection conventions. The Public Prosecutor’s Office (OM) will take the lead on the international child abduction convention, as Monorath noted the OM already has the specialized expertise and cross-agency networks needed to handle cross-border abduction cases.
Monorath acknowledged that BUFAZ currently faces significant operational challenges, so the government is moving forward with a plan to restructure the bureau into a full directorate for family law affairs. This restructuring is intended to lay the groundwork for the eventual establishment of a dedicated national Child Protection Council in Suriname. A special commission has already been formed to oversee the transformation process, and UNICEF is providing both technical and financial support to the initiative. The minister confirmed that recommendations from a 2022 independent assessment have been integrated into the operational transformation plan.
Lawmakers pressed the minister on why a three-year transition period was necessary, given that preparations for joining the conventions have been underway for several years. Monorath explained that the timeline aligns with the planned restructuring of BUFAZ. Converting the existing department within the Ministry of Justice into an independent directorate requires substantial organizational changes, and he argued that immediately creating a fully operational Child Protection Council would be unrealistic.
In addition to the transition timeline, the amendment introduced by Monorath clarifies that the ministers of justice and foreign affairs will hold joint responsibility for implementation of the conventions. Lawmakers raised further questions about the impact of the delayed timeline and the possibility of Suriname entering reservations to specific provisions of the treaties, including issues around age limits for child support and alignment with existing national law. They also asked whether the government has fully accounted for the costs of international legal procedures, legal aid, and institutional strengthening.
Monorath responded that agreements on cost allocation and coverage will be finalized in the coming months, but emphasized that Suriname must take full financial responsibility for costs related to protecting its own citizens, including children. Lawmakers stressed that the transition period cannot be used to delay preparatory work, and called for a clear public timeline listing required national legal amendments, budget allocations, and assigned responsibilities for implementing bodies.
The minister also addressed ongoing questions about the status of the Suriname Children’s Ombudsman Institute. Although DNA approved legislation to create the institution in 2024, it is not yet fully operational. A presidential working group was convened to develop the institute’s organizational structure, staffing plan, compensation framework, and implementing regulations. The working group’s original mandate has expired, and a decision on whether to extend its work is still pending.
Monorath framed the Children’s Ombudsman Institute and the four Hague conventions as complementary components of a comprehensive national child protection system. The ombudsman will focus on protecting children’s rights within Suriname, while the international treaties will enable cross-border cooperation to resolve transnational child welfare cases.
During the parliamentary debate, lawmakers also drew attention to ongoing child protection challenges within Suriname, including child labor, domestic violence, sexual abuse, and unequal access to education. They emphasized that international agreements have limited practical impact if domestic child protection institutions do not function effectively. While DNA’s approval of the four conventions marks an important expansion of international legal protection for children, the government now faces the task of delivering on the required organizational, legal, and budgetary commitments over the three-year transition period to bring the treaties into force.
-
TAS: Wanneer politieke macht de wet verdringt, verliest Suriname zijn rechtsstaat
A growing institutional crisis at Suriname’s Telecommunications Authority (TAS) has pulled back the curtain on a deeply unsettling reality: personal power grabs, partisan political interference, and longstanding institutional weaknesses are once again threatening to override the country’s legal framework. What began as a routine end to a director’s statutory term has erupted into open conflict, raising fundamental questions about the future of the rule of law in Suriname.
On October 20 and 21, 2026, the situation at TAS descended into chaos. According to TAS’s Board of Commissioners (RvC), outgoing director Wendy Jap-A-Joe, whose legally mandated five-year term has already expired, has refused to hand over control of the agency. The standoff has already spilled over into physical confrontations, with accusations of intimidation on both sides. What was meant to be an independent public regulator has become an arena for a raw struggle for political and institutional power.
To understand the legal context of this dispute, it is necessary to revisit Suriname’s 2004 Telecommunications Facilities Act. Article 2, Section 2 of the legislation (SB 2004 No. 151) clearly states that the TAS director is appointed by the president, following a nomination from the relevant minister and approval from the Council of Ministers, for a fixed five-year term. Jap-A-Joe was appointed via presidential resolution effective October 20, 2021, meaning her term officially concluded on October 19, 2026.
Her appointment and term length are not set by a standard private employment contract, but by the text of the law and the presidential resolution grounded in that law. A standard labor agreement cannot independently extend a public law appointment of this nature. Despite this, Jap-A-Joe has attempted to justify her continued occupation of the directorship by citing an existing employment contract, a claim that raises its own set of legal questions.
Under Article 4, Section 4 of the same Telecommunications Act, the employment terms for the TAS director must be set by the minister, after consultation with the RvC and formal approval from the Council of Ministers. This creates a clear division of legal authority: employment terms cannot be legally set outside the procedures mandated by law. According to publicly available information, the contract Jap-A-Joe relies on was never submitted to the RvC for review. There is also no public evidence that the minister set her employment terms, that the RvC was consulted, or that the required Council of Ministers approval was obtained. This leads to a fundamental legal question: was this contract ever legally valid in the first place?
Without public access to the contract and the required official approvals, it is impossible to definitively assess the agreement’s validity. But as the party relying on the document, Jap-A-Joe has a responsibility to make its existence, content, and legal basis open to public scrutiny. Even if the contract were ultimately found to be legally valid, it cannot override the fixed five-year term set by statute. Any potential employment law claims she may have are entirely separate from the legal authority to continue running TAS. Furthermore, Article 4, Section 2 of the act explicitly lays out provisions for temporary acting leadership when the directorship is vacant. If no deputy directors are available to step in, that authority falls to the RvC.
What makes this crisis even more troubling is the political response from senior leaders of Suriname’s ruling ABOP party. ABOP chair Ronnie Brunswijk has publicly defended Jap-A-Joe, and other members of the ABOP parliamentary caucus have repeatedly reaffirmed their support for her continued tenure. While it is entirely within a political party’s right to critique administrative decisions, political loyalty can never replace legally defined authority. A public institution is not the property of a political party, and a senior leadership position is not a political entitlement. Political protection cannot extend a legal appointment that has already expired. Political leaders have a particular responsibility to make clear to their supporters that no person is above the law.
The actions of police officers at TAS during the standoff have made the situation even more alarming. Suriname’s Police Minister Harish Monorath has launched an investigation into the presence of uniformed on-duty officers at the agency, despite the fact that the national police leadership had not issued any order for officers to deploy there. At the same time, officers assigned to Minister Raymond Landveld (who oversees TAS) were suddenly recalled. Monorath has claimed that the recall is part of a routine transfer policy and unrelated to the TAS crisis. This claim needs to be independently verified. While the timing of the recall raises legitimate critical questions, it does not on its own prove political retaliation. Key unanswered questions remain: Who ordered police officers to be present at TAS? Who authorized their deployment? Did officers act outside the normal chain of command? The police must serve only the rule of law and the public good. If political influence over the police force is proven, that would represent a severe erosion of Suriname’s democratic legal order.
Minister Landveld has publicly stated that Jap-A-Joe’s term has ended and that a leadership handover is legally required. Despite this, the conflict has escalated dramatically. Why was legal administrative continuity not secured in a timely manner before the term expired? How did a routine appointment issue escalate into physical clashes and institutional disruption? The government, led by President Chan Santokhi, must now demonstrate that it is committed to upholding and enforcing legal authority across all public institutions.
At its core, the TAS crisis is not just a dispute over one director, one minister, or one political party. It touches on a foundational principle of democratic governance: all state power must be exercised only in accordance with the law and within the bounds set by law. For this reason, every aspect of this dispute demands independent investigation: the legal basis of the disputed employment contract, the decision-making process that led to the current standoff, the violent clashes that broke out at TAS headquarters, and the unauthorized deployment of police officers.
Suriname does not need displays of raw political power. What it needs is public leaders who respect and uphold the rule of law. When personal ambition and political loyalty displace legally defined authority, it is not just one institution that is damaged— the very foundation of the rule of law itself is undermined.
By dr. Jennifer van Dijk-Silos
Passie voor Suriname -
Rook van uitslaande bosbrand Commewijne bereikt Nieuw-Amsterdam, mogelijk ook Paramaribo
A large out-of-control wildfire burning through forested areas in Commewijne, Suriname, has sent thick plumes of smoke reaching the town of Nieuw-Amsterdam, with officials warning the haze could continue spreading toward the capital city of Paramaribo.
The fire is currently raging near Belwaarde, at the former Plantage De Vries site, and has already impacted surrounding communities including the Suzannedaal district and the Ordonnanceweg area close to the local Military Project. Even populations living outside of the immediate fire zone are already reporting disruptive effects from the persistent smoke covering the region.
In response to the growing public health risk, Suriname’s Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Labor has issued an urgent alert, calling on all residents in affected areas to minimize their exposure to the toxic wildfire haze. The ministry has released a series of actionable safety recommendations for at-risk communities:
Residents in smoke-covered areas are advised to keep all windows and exterior doors closed as much as possible to block out harmful particles. Vulnerable groups, particularly people living with asthma and other chronic respiratory conditions, are strongly urged to remain indoors wherever possible. To further prevent smoke from seeping into residential spaces, the ministry recommends sealing gaps under doors with damp cloths.
For residents who must travel outdoors through smoke-affected areas, officials recommend wearing a properly fitted N95 or KN95 respirator mask, which can significantly reduce inhalation of fine hazardous particles contained in wildfire smoke.
Health authorities warn that breathing wildfire smoke can trigger a range of adverse health symptoms, including eye and nasal irritation, persistent coughing, sneezing, skin itching, and shortness of breath. Any person experiencing these symptoms is advised to contact their general practitioner immediately, rather than waiting for symptoms to worsen.
As of the latest update, the Ministry of Public Health confirms it is in constant coordination with the National Coordination Center for Disaster Management (NCCR) to monitor the spread of the fire and smoke hour-by-hour. The public has been urged to remain alert and comply with all published health guidance. At this stage, no further details have been released regarding the total size of the burned area, the cause of the ignition, or an estimated timeline for bringing the blaze under full control.
-
Warm weer met kans op regen- en onweersbuien
On Thursday, October 22, Suriname will experience predominantly warm weather, alternating between stretches of cloud cover and clear sunny periods throughout the day, according to the latest local meteorological update. The day will open with largely dry conditions across most of the country, broken up by scattered cloud banks and regular intervals of sunshine. Temperatures will climb steadily through the morning hours, with the capital city of Paramaribo projected to hit 30 degrees Celsius by the end of the morning period. A light to moderate wind blowing predominantly from the east to the northeast will bring a small degree of cooling relief, though the overall humid, warm conditions will persist across the nation. As the day moves into the afternoon, temperatures will continue their upward climb. Depending on geographic location, maximum temperatures across many regions of Suriname will reach between 33 and 36 degrees Celsius. This combination of unseasonable warmth and growing cloud cover creates favorable conditions for localized rain showers and thunderstorms to develop. The highest likelihood of these disruptive weather events is concentrated in the country’s interior regions and western districts, though isolated sudden showers along the nation’s coastline cannot be ruled out. Moving into the evening hours, the extreme midday warmth will gradually ease across the country. While scattered cloud cover may remain in some local areas, overall storm and shower activity is expected to taper off through the late afternoon and evening, with clearing skies possible in many regions. Overnight temperatures in and around Paramaribo will drop gradually to settle between 25 and 27 degrees Celsius.
-
Ballon d’Or 2026: Messi’s historische erfenis en de jacht op de gouden bal
The global football community is counting down to one of its most anticipated annual events: the 70th edition of the Ballon d’Or, the sport’s most prestigious individual honor, which will be awarded for the first time in London on October 26. The 2026 gala carries special symbolic weight, marking seven decades since the award’s founding in 1956, and returning the ceremony to the home nation of Stanley Matthews, the English forward who claimed the very first Ballon d’Or trophy 70 years ago.
As attention builds around this year’s crop of contenders, one name continues to tower over the award’s entire history: Lionel Messi. The Argentine icon, who has lifted the Ballon d’Or a record eight times across his career, is not only the most decorated player in the award’s history but also the sole reason Argentina shares the top spot for most titles by nation with eight wins. Messi claimed his eight trophies in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2015, 2019, 2021, and 2023, with his 2023 win coming as a crowning honor following Argentina’s 2022 FIFA World Cup victory in Qatar.
Messi’s unprecedented record underscores the sheer uniqueness of his two-decade run at the top of global football. His dominance spanned multiple generations of players across stints with FC Barcelona, Paris Saint-Germain, and Inter Miami, and his unmatched football IQ, dribbling skill, clinical finishing, and ability to single-handedly decide big matches have cemented his status as one of the greatest players to ever step onto a pitch. His 8-5 lead in Ballon d’Or wins over longtime rival Cristiano Ronaldo remains one of the most iconic statistical gaps in modern football history, with the pair defining the debate over the world’s best player for more than 15 years.
This year, Argentina shares the top ranking for most national Ballon d’Or titles with France, which hit the 8-win mark after current holder Ousmane Dembélé claimed the 2025 award. Unlike Argentina, whose eight titles all belong to Messi, France’s eight wins are spread across six different world-class players. The most successful French Ballon d’Or winner is Michel Platini, who made history by claiming three consecutive titles between 1983 and 1985, with other past winners including Raymond Kopa (1958), Jean-Pierre Papin (1991), Zinédine Zidane (1998), and Karim Benzema (2022). France’s consistent production of elite talent across every era of the award’s history has cemented its status as a permanent powerhouse in the global football landscape, with current stars like Kylian Mbappé continuing to keep the nation in contention for future honors.
Tied for third place with seven titles each are Portugal, Germany, and the Netherlands. Portugal’s seven wins are heavily anchored by Ronaldo’s five titles, with the other two won by Eusébio (1965) and Luís Figo (2000). Ronaldo’s five Ballon d’Or honors came during his era of shared dominance with Messi, and his incredible goalscoring output, physical strength, aerial ability, and unprecedented longevity at the highest level have secured his place among the greatest forwards in football history. Notably, Portugal’s seven titles are an extraordinary achievement for a nation with a far smaller population than most other top European football powerhouses.
Germany’s seven titles are spread across five players: Gerd Müller (1970), Franz Beckenbauer (1972, 1976), Karl-Heinz Rummenigge (1980, 1981), Lothar Matthäus (1990), and Matthias Sammer (1996), reflecting the nation’s enormous influence on European football through the 1970s and 1980s. Defining figures like Beckenbauer, who revolutionized the role of the modern defender, and Müller, whose innate goalscoring instinct remains unmatched, left an indelible mark on the award’s history.
The Netherlands also holds seven titles, concentrated across just three legendary players: Johan Cruyff (1971, 1973, 1974), Ruud Gullit (1987), and Marco van Basten (1988, 1989, 1992). Cruyff’s influence extended far beyond his three Ballon d’Or wins, reshaping global football as both a player and a manager and building the Netherlands’ reputation as a producer of revolutionary, world-class talent. While neither Germany nor the Netherlands has produced a new Ballon d’Or winner in decades, their historic achievements remain among the most impressive in the award’s 70-year history.
Next in the rankings are Brazil, England, and Italy, each with five Ballon d’Or titles. Brazil’s five wins came from Ronaldo (1997, 2002), Rivaldo (1999), Ronaldinho (2005), and Kaká (2007), though the nation has not claimed a men’s Ballon d’Or since Kaká’s 2007 win. England’s five titles include the inaugural 1956 win by Stanley Matthews, followed by Bobby Charlton (1966), Kevin Keegan (1978, 1979), and Michael Owen (2001). Hosting the 2026 ceremony adds extra stakes for English football, with Harry Kane emerging as a top contender this year after a extraordinarily prolific season with Bayern Munich, while young stars Jude Bellingham and Declan Rice have also drawn significant attention ahead of the vote. Italy’s five winners are Omar Sívori (1961), Gianni Rivera (1969), Paolo Rossi (1982), Roberto Baggio (1993), and Fabio Cannavaro (2006), with Cannavaro remaining the nation’s most recent winner following Italy’s 2006 World Cup triumph.
Spain currently holds four all-time Ballon d’Or titles, won by Alfredo Di Stéfano (1957, 1959), Luis Suárez (1960), and most recently Rodri in 2024. Rodri’s win was notable for breaking a long trend: holding midfielders who specialize in controlling game tempo and dictating play are far less likely to claim the top honor than high-scoring forwards. The nation is also home to one of the most exciting young prospects in this year’s race, 16-year-old Lamine Yamal, whose rapid rise at FC Barcelona and for the Spanish national team has put him firmly in the global spotlight, embodying the clash between established stars and emerging new talent that defines every Ballon d’Or race.
Unlike many popular football awards, the Ballon d’Or is not awarded based solely on goalscoring numbers. Voters judge candidates on three core criteria: individual performance and a player’s ability to decide critical matches, team success and major trophy wins over the qualifying period, and overall class and sportsmanship. This means a forward with eye-catching goal statistics will not automatically win the honor, with influence on team performance, club and international success all carrying heavy weight in the final decision.
As the global football community gathers in London on October 26 to crown the 2026 winner, the ceremony will do more than name the year’s best player: it will celebrate seven decades of the award that has chronicled the evolution of modern football, connecting legends of the 1950s to the global superstars of today. While all eyes will be on whether a rising young star can rewrite the award’s history this year, one fact remains unchallenged: Lionel Messi’s unprecedented eight titles have set a bar that may never be matched.