标签: Suriname

苏里南

  • President lanceert platform om kwetsbare Surinamers naar werk en ondernemerschap te leiden

    President lanceert platform om kwetsbare Surinamers naar werk en ondernemerschap te leiden

    Suriname has inaugurated a comprehensive national initiative designed to transition vulnerable populations from poverty to sustainable employment and entrepreneurship. The Suriname Labour Intelligence Platform (SLIP), launched officially by President Jennifer Simons on Friday at the Anthony Nesty Sporthal, represents a strategic governmental effort to coordinate and enhance existing vocational training programs across the nation.

    President Simons emphasized that poverty constitutes more than merely financial insufficiency during her address at the launch ceremony. “It encompasses social isolation and dependency cycles. For building a sustainable economy, active participation from all Surinamese citizens becomes imperative,” she stated, acknowledging that while various ministries currently offer training programs, significant segments of society remain underserved.

    SLIP will function as the central coordination mechanism for vocational training, entrepreneurship development, and personal growth initiatives. The platform specifically aims to create tailored pathways for different target demographics, emphasizing practical, hands-on training in technical skills, business management, and workforce readiness. Implementation will include rigorous monitoring to assess effectiveness and guide potential expansion.

    Special attention will be directed toward three key groups: women constrained by childcare limitations from entering the workforce, at-risk youth, and early school leavers. Minister of Youth Development and Sport Lalinie Gopal highlighted that young people would receive comprehensive coaching and mentorship to secure employment or launch entrepreneurial ventures.

    The platform will operate nationwide with its central headquarters located in Paramaribo. Registration and informational resources are accessible through the official government portal at slip.gov.sr, creating a unified access point for citizens seeking to benefit from the program’s offerings.

  • Gewapend viertal ontvoert man bij zijn woning

    Gewapend viertal ontvoert man bij zijn woning

    A violent abduction unfolded in Lelydorp, Suriname on Tuesday evening when four masked assailants armed with firearms ambushed a 41-year-old man identified as M.S. on his own property at Zwartbontstraat.

    The incident occurred around 10:00 PM when the victim’s wife, A.L., awoke to the sound of her husband’s pickup truck arriving home. Shortly after, she heard distressed cries from their yard. Upon investigating, she witnessed four armed men subduing her partner in a coordinated attack.

    According to police reports, the perpetrators—all dressed in black clothing and concealing their identities—emerged from adjacent woodland areas before overpowering the victim. Security camera footage captured the moment the assailants approached the property and forcibly placed M.S. into his gray Toyota Vigo pickup truck.

    The armed group subsequently fled the scene using the victim’s vehicle, heading toward Santigronweg. Preliminary investigations indicate the attackers carried handguns and other heavy weaponry during the operation.

    Authorities have confirmed the theft of the victim’s vehicle and mobile phone, though it remains unclear whether additional items were taken during the incident. The investigation has been transferred to the Central Region Detective Unit, with no further details available regarding the victim’s current status or the motive behind the abduction.

    The case represents a concerning escalation in violent crime within the region, with law enforcement agencies pursuing multiple lines of inquiry to locate both the victim and his captors.

  • Coronie en het mysterie van de ‘afwezige epidemie’

    Coronie en het mysterie van de ‘afwezige epidemie’

    The coastal district of Coronie in Suriname has demonstrated remarkable resistance to chikungunya virus outbreaks during two major epidemic waves—first in 2014 and again in the current 2025-2026 surge—while surrounding districts experienced widespread infections. This epidemiological anomaly has drawn attention to the district’s unique cultural practices and environmental management.

    Coronie, known as Suriname’s coconut district, maintains distinctive traditions that appear to offer unintended protection against mosquito-borne diseases. Residents regularly apply coconut oil to their skin, maintain exceptionally clean properties with minimal clutter, and practice smoke fumigation using coconut husks—a traditional method that effectively repels mosquitoes before they can breed or bite.

    The Aedes aegypti mosquito, responsible for chikungunya transmission, thrives in stagnant water and human proximity. Coronie’s environmental discipline results in significantly fewer breeding grounds, directly reducing mosquito populations and transmission opportunities. Additionally, the district’s relatively isolated location and limited mobility compared to urban centers like Paramaribo decrease viral introduction risks.

    This dual protection—environmental management and cultural practices—has created a natural barrier against chikungunya that persists while other regions rely on emergency interventions like fogging and crisis meetings. The Coronie case study suggests that effective public health interventions may begin at home rather than in conference rooms, emphasizing property maintenance, community habits, and traditional knowledge that predate modern epidemic responses.

    The continued absence of confirmed cases across two separate outbreaks indicates this success is neither accidental nor temporary. It represents a sustainable model of community-level protection that combines environmental awareness with culturally embedded preventive practices, offering valuable insights for global public health strategies regarding mosquito-borne disease prevention.

  • OM intensiveert uitvoering strafvonnissen; ook zware zaken actief opgepakt

    OM intensiveert uitvoering strafvonnissen; ook zware zaken actief opgepakt

    Suriname’s Public Prosecution Service has significantly expanded the operational scope of its Sentence Execution Department to ensure stricter enforcement of court rulings across a broader spectrum of criminal cases. This strategic move aims to reinforce the principle that judicial punishments are mandatory, not optional.

    Previously focused primarily on traffic violations and labor law offenses, the department will now actively pursue the execution of sentences for a wide range of crimes. These include violations of the Road Traffic Act (Rijwet), the Drugs Act (Wet Verdovende Middelen), theft, embezzlement, forgery, fraud, and the disregard of court-issued protection orders.

    The enhanced enforcement process involves locating convicted individuals to ensure they serve their court-mandated sentences. Depending on the specific verdict, this can include serving a prison term, paying a statutory fine, or a combination of financial compensation to victims and a fine payable to the state.

    Following apprehension, convicted individuals are given an opportunity to settle their outstanding debts. Failure to pay or comply with an unconditional prison sentence results in immediate transfer to the House of Detention to serve the sentence. The Public Relations Unit of the Prosecution Service cited a recent case exemplifying this process: a man convicted for causing a traffic accident without a valid driver’s license was ordered to pay a fine and victim compensation totaling SRD 51,000. Non-payment would result in a substitute prison sentence of 61 weeks.

    The Sentence Execution Department is headquartered at the Latour Police Station, Room 4. Through this expanded mandate, the Public Prosecution Service emphasizes that its rigorous enforcement contributes directly to legal certainty, rightful retribution, and crime prevention within Surinamese society.

  • Ex- prins Andrew: van helikopterpiloot naar handelsgezant naar paria binnen het koningshuis

    Ex- prins Andrew: van helikopterpiloot naar handelsgezant naar paria binnen het koningshuis

    In an unprecedented modern royal crisis, Prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor faces the most severe consequences of his controversial associations. The Duke of York, once considered Queen Elizabeth II’s favorite child, has become the first senior British royal to be arrested in nearly four centuries, detained on his 66th birthday under suspicion of abusing his official position during his tenure as Britain’s trade envoy.

    The investigation stems from newly released Epstein documents suggesting Andrew shared official government documents with the convicted financier during his diplomatic service. While not currently charged with any crime, the arrest marks the latest chapter in a dramatic fall from grace that has unfolded over decades.

    Andrew’s royal trajectory initially followed traditional patterns for secondary heirs. After serving 22 years in the Royal Navy, including combat operations as a helicopter pilot during the 1982 Falkland War, he was appointed Britain’s Special Representative for International Trade and Investment in 2001. His frequent taxpayer-funded travels earned him the nickname “Air Miles Andy” in press circles.

    The prince’s troubles began emerging in 2007 when he sold his Windsor-area home for 20% above its £15 million asking price to Timur Kulibayev, son-in-law of then-Kazakh president Nursultan Nazarbayev, raising concerns about influence peddling. His relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, however, proved most damaging. Despite Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor, Andrew maintained their friendship until forced to resign his trade role in 2011.

    The scandal intensified in 2015 when US court documents alleged Andrew had engaged in sexual encounters with Virginia Roberts Giuffre on three occasions between 1999-2002, including when she was a minor under American law. His disastrous 2019 BBC Newsnight interview attempting to explain the Epstein relationship backfired spectacularly, drawing widespread criticism for lacking credibility and empathy toward victims.

    Following Epstein’s 2019 re-arrest and death, Giuffre filed a civil lawsuit against Andrew in August 2021. While maintaining his innocence, the prince settled for an undisclosed amount and was stripped of all military titles and royal patronages. The tragedy deepened when Giuffre died by suicide in April 2025 at age 41.

    Further revelations emerged in 2024 regarding Andrew’s relationship with a suspected Chinese spy banned from the UK for national security concerns. The final blow came in October 2024 when King Charles III revoked his brother’s princely titles and Duke of York status, ejecting him from Royal Lodge following evidence he maintained longer contact with Epstein than previously acknowledged.

    Despite losing his titles, Andrew remains eighth in line to the throne, requiring parliamentary action for removal. His ex-wife Sarah Ferguson also faces ongoing scrutiny regarding her Epstein connections. The recent release of millions of Epstein documents by the US Justice Department has ensured continued attention on the case that has reshaped modern royal history.

  • Column: Volksvertegenwoordigers of belangenvertegenwoordigers

    Column: Volksvertegenwoordigers of belangenvertegenwoordigers

    A contentious debate has erupted in Suriname regarding the substantial compensation packages for members of the judiciary, with the Prosecutor General now receiving over SRD 1 million annually. This development has sparked widespread public outrage and raised fundamental questions about legislative integrity and political priorities.

    Rather than an isolated oversight, investigation reveals this situation resulted from deliberate legislative choices embedded within the Judicial Position Law. Political figures, particularly members of the previous parliament, have engaged in extensive maneuvers to defend the legislation that enabled these substantial judicial salaries. Initial proponent Asis Gajadien (VHP) has acknowledged potential errors requiring correction, yet stops short of admitting fundamental flaws in the law’s conception. Co-initiator Geneviévre Jordan (ABOP) has maintained complete silence since public discontent surfaced.

    This controversy highlights a persistent pattern within Suriname’s legislative culture where laws frequently pass without adequate societal review. Many legislation pieces lack economic realism, contain linguistic deficiencies, and employ complex terminology that challenges even implementing agencies.

    The judicial compensation issue raises broader concerns about parliamentary intentions and priorities. Parliamentary leadership demonstrates remarkable eagerness to advance legislation benefiting high-ranking public officials while crucial workforce sectors including teachers, nurses, and healthcare professionals face persistent uncertainty regarding compensation and working conditions.

    The fundamental competency question emerges: how could multiple reviewing institutions fail to identify the complete lack of societal balance and unacceptable injustice toward the public? The responsibility ultimately rests with both parliament and government, who approve and enact legislation.

    The response to whistleblower Eugène van der San’s revelations proved particularly revealing. Rather than accepting responsibility, critics attacked the messenger and framed the exposure as a political assault against the Prosecutor General, effectively diverting attention from the core issue: how such legislation could emerge in the first place.

    This situation forces citizens to question whether parliamentarians truly represent public interests or merely advance party agendas. Under the guise of synchronizing state powers—a promise that remains unfulfilled—the produced legislation primarily secures financial advantages for judicial members during and after their service.

    Large segments of society perceive this disparity as morally unethical and unjust, creating a perception that political interests outweigh public responsibility. This case must not conclude quietly—laws can be revised, repaired, or revoked, but more importantly, accountability must be presented to society. Transparency and responsibility constitute democratic obligations rather than political options, and both parliament and government must now demonstrate whom they truly represent.

  • VES: Wanica Ziekenhuis uitbouwen tot centrum voor chronische zorg

    VES: Wanica Ziekenhuis uitbouwen tot centrum voor chronische zorg

    The Association of Economists in Suriname (VES) has unveiled an ambitious proposal to transform Wanica Hospital into a specialized center dedicated to treating chronic diseases including diabetes, cardiovascular conditions, and chronic kidney diseases. This strategic initiative aims to address the growing healthcare demands within Suriname’s fastest-growing district through an integrated care model that promises enhanced efficiency, affordability, and sustainability.

    With approximately 118,000 residents, Wanica represents a critical demographic shift in Suriname’s population landscape. The district’s substantial proportion of inhabitants aged 40-70 years creates heightened vulnerability to chronic health conditions. According to VES data, diabetes affects approximately 14% of the population (16,300 individuals), cardiovascular diseases impact 25% (29,500 individuals), and chronic kidney diseases affect 15% (17,700 individuals). Collectively, these conditions represent over 60,000 patients, many experiencing multiple comorbid health challenges.

    The proposed healthcare revolution centers on implementing ‘care pathways’ – integrated treatment trajectories that consolidate prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and aftercare services according to specific disease profiles. This innovative approach would establish dedicated diabetes care pathways, cardiovascular care pathways, and renal care pathways within Wanica Hospital.

    Economic analysis indicates that care consolidation would significantly reduce duplicate testing, optimize staff utilization, and minimize medication waste. These efficiencies would enable the hospital to treat more patients while maintaining lower structural operational costs.

    Financial projections estimate annual operational costs for the proposed care pathways at approximately USD 16 million, against expected annual revenue of USD 19-20 million. The resulting 10% profit margin is conceptualized not as profit maximization but as essential capital for maintenance, innovation, and improved staff compensation.

    A mixed financing model proposes 30% government funding, 30% through employee and employer premiums (including SZF reform), and 40% private investment. With phased implementation over four to five years, the hospital could achieve break-even operation within six to seven years.

    The specialization initiative is expected to generate substantial employment opportunities for nurses, laboratory technicians, dialysis specialists, dietitians, data analysts, and healthcare managers. Increased productivity would create financial flexibility for competitive salaries, potentially reducing the emigration of healthcare professionals abroad.

    VES envisions Wanica Hospital as the central hub within a national healthcare network, connecting with RGD clinics, regional hospitals, and telemedicine facilities serving interior regions. This model demonstrates how demographic realities, economic considerations, and policy vision can converge to create structural healthcare reform with nationwide implications.

  • Wereldleiders bespreken kansen en risico’s van AI op grote top in India

    Wereldleiders bespreken kansen en risico’s van AI op grote top in India

    The fourth Global Artificial Intelligence Summit in New Delhi witnessed significant diplomatic engagement as world leaders gathered to address the rapidly evolving AI landscape. United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres and French President Emmanuel Macron delivered keynote addresses emphasizing the need for global cooperation and equitable access to artificial intelligence technologies.

    Guterres issued a stark warning against allowing AI’s future to be determined by “the whims of a handful of billionaires,” advocating instead for a $3 billion global fund to ensure open access to AI systems. He emphasized that technological development must not exacerbate existing inequalities between developed and developing nations.

    French President Macron articulated Europe’s balanced approach, stating: “Europe is not a place of blind trust in regulation, but rather an ecosystem that fosters innovation and investment while maintaining safety standards.” He reaffirmed France’s commitment to collaborative rule-making with international partners including India.

    The summit, notable as the first global AI conference hosted by a developing nation, provided India with a platform to showcase its emerging AI capabilities. Prime Minister Narendra Modi highlighted recent launches of indigenous AI models, asserting that “AI solutions successful in India can be deployed globally.” He emphasized India’s belief in open systems and shared benefits, noting that millions of young Indian minds could contribute to making AI safer and more effective.

    A notable absence was Microsoft founder Bill Gates, who withdrew his participation shortly before his scheduled speech amid ongoing questions about his associations with the late financier Jeffrey Epstein. A representative from the Gates Foundation attended in his place.

    Despite India’s rise to third place in Stanford University’s global AI competitiveness ranking, experts acknowledge the country still faces significant challenges in competing with AI superpowers the United States and China. The five-day conference, concluding Friday, continues to serve as a critical forum for discussing AI’s potential benefits while addressing its associated risks and ethical considerations.

  • Suriname bereidt zich voor op ratificatie VN-verdrag voor bescherming volle zee

    Suriname bereidt zich voor op ratificatie VN-verdrag voor bescherming volle zee

    Suriname has commenced a comprehensive three-day national workshop to prepare for the ratification and implementation of the United Nations Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) Agreement. The initiative, launched Wednesday, represents a significant step toward global marine conservation efforts.

    The workshop, organized by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Business, and International Cooperation in collaboration with the High Seas Alliance, brings together policymakers, scientists, civil society organizations, and private sector representatives. This diverse participation aims to equip Suriname with both the technical expertise and institutional framework necessary for successful adoption of the binding international instrument.

    Adopted under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in June 2023, the BBNJ Agreement establishes legal frameworks for conserving and sustainably using marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction—commonly known as the high seas.

    A recent regional analysis titled ‘High Seas, High Stakes: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the BBNJ Agreement in the Caribbean (2025)’ indicates that Caribbean nations similar to Suriname stand to gain substantial long-term economic benefits. These advantages include improved fisheries management, enhanced monitoring of offshore activities, and reduced losses from illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing practices.

    Furthermore, the global biotechnology sector utilizing marine genetic resources is currently valued at approximately $400 to $650 million annually. By strengthening national research and innovation capabilities, Suriname could potentially tap into this growing market segment.

    The agreement holds particular strategic importance for Suriname, which possesses an Exclusive Economic Zone exceeding 130,000 km² and a coastline forming part of the ecologically significant Guianas Shield ecosystem. The nation faces emerging environmental challenges due to expanding offshore operations, increasing maritime traffic, and growing energy sector activities.

    Through the BBNJ framework, Suriname will gain opportunities to intensify international cooperation, access specialized funding mechanisms, facilitate technology transfer, and participate in decision-making processes concerning marine protected areas on the high seas.

    Having signed the agreement in June 2025, Suriname has demonstrated its commitment to actively engage in the new global governance structures that will become operational once the treaty enters into force internationally.

  • Asabina erkent fouten rond bezoldigingswetten: Corrigerend optreden nodig

    Asabina erkent fouten rond bezoldigingswetten: Corrigerend optreden nodig

    In a striking admission of institutional failure, BEP parliamentary leader Ronny Asabina has publicly acknowledged that Suriname’s National Assembly severely mishandled controversial legislation governing financial provisions for the three branches of government. The assemblyman described the situation as “a blow to public trust” and called for immediate consultations to rectify the widely criticized arrangements.

    Asabina conceded that parliament has become the target of intense societal criticism and distrust, noting that the experience feels “sometimes hurtful and intimidating” for elected representatives. The laws originally intended to harmonize financial provisions across the legislative, executive, and judicial branches have instead created a public perception of self-enrichment and excessive benefits rather than achieving synchronization and balance.

    While rejecting suggestions of bad faith, Asabina stated unequivocally: “We have failed miserably. No branch excluded. Society rightly feels misled.” He expressed particular regret about the compensation structure for the judiciary, which has provoked widespread public outrage. The politician acknowledged that his own BEP faction couldn’t have anticipated how disproportionately and inappropriately the decisions would unfold.

    Asabina revealed critical flaws in the legislative process, noting that parliament didn’t serve as the first stop in the lawmaking process and that certain elements escaped notice during legal translation and formulation of articles. He questioned whether designers and direct stakeholders fully comprehended the scope of the controversial provisions.

    The assemblyman highlighted unmet promises regarding financial transparency, revealing that commitments to share the financial consequences with parliament remain unfulfilled. He also criticized the lack of substantive depth during parliamentary deliberations, which were often overshadowed by mutual accusations and populist rhetoric.

    Asabina called for emergency consultations among the three branches of government, followed by thorough review and repair of financial provisions, including budgeting for the financial implications. He emphasized this isn’t pressure tactics but a call for shared responsibility within the separation of powers framework.

    Additionally, he proposed broader reforms including establishing an independent Integrity Chamber to promote governance integrity and considering international examples that implement maximum income limits for top officials to reduce legal inequality. Asabina stressed that transparency, accountability, and restored trust must form the foundation of the recovery process.