标签： Grenada

The Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (ECSC) has formally declared its jurisdictional authority to adjudicate a contentious legal challenge concerning the appointment of Justice Eddie David Ventose. Former Grenadian Attorney General Jimmy Bristol KC initiated proceedings on December 9, contesting the validity of Justice Ventose’s appointment to the appellate bench effective January of the previous year.

In his substantive claim, Bristol contends that Justice Ventose failed to satisfy the statutory qualifications mandated by Section 5 of the Court’s Order. Specifically, the petition argues the St. Lucian jurist lacked the requisite five years of judicial experience stipulated under Section 5(2)(a)(i) and insufficient advocacy practice duration contrary to Section 5(2)(a)(ii)’s fifteen-year requirement.

Presiding Justice Raulston Glasgow delivered a comprehensive 60-page ruling addressing preliminary jurisdictional objections. While acknowledging Bristol’s procedural standing to raise constitutional questions, Justice Glasgow emphasized that the present determination exclusively concerns judicial jurisdiction rather than substantive merit evaluation.

Notably, the ruling refrained from assessing Justice Ventose’s professional capabilities, with Justice Glasgow observing that one could hardly question the jurist’s substantive qualifications based on his distinguished academic and judicial record. The core judicial determination affirmed the ECSC’s constitutional authority to hear challenges regarding judicial appointments under the West Indies Associated States Supreme Court Order 1967.

The court scheduled the substantive hearing for February 25, 2026, with written submissions required by February 16. Justice Glasgow denied the application to strike out Bristol’s claim as an abuse of process while exempting both parties from cost allocations absent demonstrated unreasonable conduct.

Legal representation featured prominent Caribbean legal figures, including former Trinidad and Tobago Attorney General Anand Ramlogan representing Justice Ventose, while King’s Counsel Sydney Bennett advocated for Bristol. The Judicial and Legal Services Commission retained Michael Hylton KC and associates for defense proceedings.

Grenadian attorney and Democratic People’s Movement (DPM) member Jasmin Redhead has issued a powerful condemnation of the deeply entrenched partisan divisions plaguing Grenada’s political landscape. During an address to Grenadian nationals in New York, Redhead characterized the nation’s politics as a “battlefield” where families become “collateral damage” due to what she termed “weaponised partisanship.”

Redhead revealed disturbing accounts of citizens living in fear of political victimization, describing mothers distressed by children skipping school to avoid bullying related to their parents’ political affiliations. She emphasized these aren’t mere statistics but “real people carrying the weight of a system that doesn’t work for them.”

The attorney, who returned to Grenada in 2009 after twelve years in New York, identified poor governance as imposing a “silent tax” on diaspora investments, property security, and educational opportunities. She championed transparent systems that prioritize merit over political loyalty as essential for breaking the “5-year seesaw” of stalled national development.

Highlighting vulnerable populations, Redhead noted that weak systems disproportionately affect women, who bear much of the national burden through inadequate healthcare, education, and social services. She underscored the critical need for women’s leadership, asserting that “when women rise, families rise, communities rise, and Grenada, Carriacou, and Petite Martinique rise.”

Redhead endorsed DPM Leader Peter David, her friend of three decades, as a unifying force capable of transcending partisan divisions. Her message to the diaspora called for a fundamental shift “from colour to country, from tribalism to unity, from barely surviving to succeeding.” The DPM, launched successfully in November, continues building momentum for its people-centered transformation agenda across Grenadian communities domestically and internationally.

Grenada’s parliamentary oversight mechanisms received significant reinforcement through an awareness seminar conducted for the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) on December 16. Chaired by Opposition Leader Emmalin Pierre, the event brought together PAC members, Audit Department staff, and statutory board representatives to emphasize the committee’s critical role in ensuring governmental financial transparency.

In a virtual address, Anguilla Premier Cora Richardson-Hodge, former opposition leader herself, articulated the PAC’s fundamental purpose: “The Public Accounts Committee is the most important committee of any parliament. Its foundation exists to create greater openness in government finances, based on the belief that transparent budgetary practices ensure public funds are spent as promised while maximizing benefits.”

The seminar clarified that the PAC’s mandate focuses specifically on evaluating the efficiency, effectiveness, and economy of policy implementation rather than questioning policy itself. This distinction underscores the committee’s non-partisan nature despite its composition including opposition members.

Opposition Leader Pierre emphasized the PAC’s unique position within Grenada’s parliamentary democracy: “It is not a partisan body, nor is it an administrative authority. Rather, it is a core oversight mechanism of Parliament, entrusted with safeguarding the public interest by ensuring that public funds are used lawfully, efficiently, and for their intended purposes.”

The committee’s authority derives from Parliament Standing Order 69(1), which establishes its composition of three to five members excluding cabinet ministers, currently including Kate Lewis-Peters and Dr. Clarice Modeste from the Lower House, with Salim Rahaman and Roderick St Clair representing the Upper House.

This seminar followed PAC members’ July 2025 training at the UK Parliament, where they observed actual committee hearings. MP Lewis-Peters highlighted a key learning: “Despite its composition of opposition members and independent senators, the PAC is not a political body. We are here to ensure our taxpayers’ dollars are properly managed through close collaboration with the Auditor General.”

The event reinforced the PAC’s systematic approach: scrutinizing government expenditure, ensuring accountability, making recommendations, and requiring public government responses to findings—ultimately upholding good governance principles in public administration.