标签： Dominica

The words of legendary Jamaican musician Peter Tosh, written in his 1977 track *Equal Rights*, ring as sharply across the global geopolitical landscape today as they did 50 years ago: “Everyone is crying out for peace, yes, None is crying out for justice. Everybody want to go to heaven, But nobody want to die.” This unflinching observation frames every modern conflict, and every hollow global discussion of ceasefire that avoids the hard work of addressing the injustices that spawn violence.

Decades before the current standoff between the U.S.-Israel alliance and Iran, Pope Leo XIV drew fierce condemnation from Washington when he warned that nations that prioritize military buildup over negotiation are simply laying the groundwork for a larger, deadlier future conflict. Where the Pope centered the need for justice as the foundation of any lasting calm, Washington has insisted on strength as the prerequisite for peace. Standing between these two opposing positions is the enduring legacy of Peter Tosh, who grasped long before either leader spoke that military dominance is not peace, and forced surrender is not peace. Both are nothing more than paused war, waiting for the next generation to inherit the bloody and costly debt.

Today, Washington offers global order rooted in domination: a silence enforced by military and economic power, imposed by the strongest party on the weakest. Like Tosh, the Pope demands that nations confront the truth that peace can only grow from justice – a messy, costly, disruptive project that few global powers are willing to undertake, without which no ceasefire will ever hold. For small island nations across the Caribbean, which have lived under both systems of forced silence and marginalization, the choice between these two paths could not be more consequential.

Take the ongoing standoff in the Strait of Hormuz, a 33-kilometer waterway that carries 20% of the world’s traded oil. Any prolonged closure would send energy prices skyrocketing, hitting the world’s most vulnerable economies first. For the Caribbean, which imports nearly all of its fuel, every sector from tourism to aviation to national food supply chains is acutely sensitive to energy price shocks, leaving the region structurally exposed to a conflict 10,000 kilometers away.

Trinidadian political economist Lloyd Best taught that this vulnerability is not a random accident – it is built into the very architecture of the Caribbean economy, a legacy of the plantation system that never truly ended, only adapted to new global power structures. The Caribbean’s exposure to far-off conflict is the direct inheritance of an economy built from its origins to serve the interests of foreign powers, not local people.

This means the seven-week-long U.S.-Israel Iran confrontation, with diplomatic talks currently stalled, is not some distant distant drama playing out on the other side of the world. The Caribbean is not an observer to this crisis – it is already a participant. This inherent economic exposure does not grant the region automatic moral authority, but choosing silence in the face of a structurally created vulnerability is not neutrality: it is consent to a system that puts the Caribbean at perpetual risk. As Best made clear, this vulnerability is no coincidence; it is the intentional design of an economic order the Caribbean never created.

The conflicts playing out in Gaza, Sudan, and Ukraine are not isolated tragedies. They are the same tragedy repeating, and that repetition follows a clear pattern. Time and again, the world is offered not peace, but two varieties of false silence. The first is the silence of domination, where the stronger party seizes so much that resistance becomes impossible. The occupied and bombed are not at peace – they are simply too exhausted to fight. The second is the silence of surrender, where the weaker party is forced to accept unjust terms because it can no longer afford to continue resisting. Both are marketed to the world as peace, but neither delivers anything lasting.

History is littered with the proof of this pattern. The Treaty of Versailles punished Germany after World War I without addressing the underlying economic and political causes of the conflict, and just 20 years later the world descended into an even deadlier global war. The Oslo Accords, long criticized by activists and scholars, promised a Palestinian state on paper while leaving the Israeli occupation fully intact; today, Gaza lies in ruins. The Taif Agreement that ended Lebanon’s civil war only redistributed power between the same factions that started the conflict, leaving the country to lurch from one catastrophic crisis to the next for decades.

This pattern is not a coincidence – it is a simple mathematical truth. Injustice that is deferred becomes war with compound interest, growing larger and more costly with every passing generation. The world repeatedly claims it wants peace, but consistently refuses to pay the price that justice demands. And when the bill finally comes due, it is almost always paid by people who had no hand in creating the original injustice.

For the Caribbean, this is not abstract academic theory – it is lived collective memory. The plantation system was called “peaceful” by colonial powers. Colonial order was framed as peace by the empires that ruled the region. The silence of dispossessed Caribbean people has been mislabeled as peace countless times across our history, and we know exactly what that false peace cost. No other region has less excuse for mistaking managed, unequal injustice for lasting peace.

But Tosh understood an even harder truth, captured in that same iconic verse: “Everybody want to go to heaven, but nobody want to die.” People want the outcome of peace without enduring the difficult process of justice; they want the celebration of Easter Sunday without the sacrifice of Good Friday. Most people genuinely say they want peace, but they flinch away from the hard, disruptive, costly work of uprooting injustice that any lasting peace requires. Justice demands discomfort, sacrifice, and a willingness to challenge the very arrangements that many people quietly benefit from. So again and again, societies settle for the cheap short-term false peace of domination or surrender, choosing just an interval between wars, and ending up inheriting the next conflict.

This brings us to the core question Tosh’s song poses to the world today: Do we demand peace because we believe in justice, or just because war is inconvenient for our daily lives? Do we recoil from the violence in Gaza because our consciences are troubled by injustice, or because rising oil prices hurt our local tourism industry? Are we crying out for justice, or just for the return of our comfortable pre-conflict routines?

Washington’s answer is already clear: it has pushed for ceasefire resolutions rooted in the old model of surrender and domination, paired with massive military buildups that reinforce unequal power dynamics. The Pope, by contrast, has been dismissed as disgraceful for his unflinching insistence that justice must come before any permanent ceasefire, and his position is equally clear: lasting peace is only possible as the product of justice. But Tosh’s framing remains the most complete: equal rights and justice for all people, not only for those whose suffering is convenient for global powers to acknowledge.

It is time for the Caribbean to raise its collective voice on this issue – not just through formal government communiqués, but through the voice of the Caribbean people. Saying “the Caribbean” does not mean pretending all people across the region share one identical view. It means insisting that our shared structural vulnerability demands a shared public voice, even when full unity is difficult to achieve. The Caribbean has already done this work successfully before: on the issue of climate justice, the region refused to accept the unfair terms set by the major fossil fuel emitting powers, named the injustice of the crisis, and demanded meaningful redress. That same moral framework is needed now, applied to war, military occupation, and the selective enforcement of international law.

The Caribbean people should clearly demand three core principles. First, any ceasefire should be judged not by how quickly it restores silence, but by whether binding accountability is required of all parties equally, not suspended the moment the violating party is a powerful global ally. Second, post-conflict reconstruction must never be used as leverage to force silence: there can be no rebuilding without full respect for human and political rights. Third, amnesty for perpetrators can never come before full truth and accountability for crimes committed. Justice deferred is simply the next war, scheduled for a future generation.

Raising this clear voice will come at a cost. It will cost diplomatic capital, and it will force the region to give up the comfortable neutrality that many actors seek at this cruel and dangerous moment. It will mean losing the quiet approval of global powers whose favor many Caribbean states have learned to cultivate, even when it runs against the region’s own core interests. But the alternative – crying out for peace while endorsing the very structural inequalities that guarantee peace will fail – is exactly what led us to the current crises in Gaza, Sudan, and the Strait of Hormuz.

This old model of false peace has never worked, it cannot work now, and it was never designed to work. Military might does not equal moral right, and any peace built on dominance is always temporary, and always falls as someone else’s burden when it finally collapses.

If the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, oil prices will spike even further, making air travel unaffordable for much of the region and crippling tourism. No global power will airlift the Caribbean out of this crisis. The Caribbean people will be forced to bear the cost, just as we have borne countless other costs that we did nothing to create. So let us at least stand for a principle that will outlast this current crisis, something that future generations can build on.

Tosh sang it clearly, a demand that still echoes: “I don’t want no peace, I need equal rights and justice.” Washington has called the Pope’s call for justice disgraceful. From his grave, Peter Tosh calls both global power and empty statements of peace to account. The Caribbean people have always known which voice aligns with the deepest lessons of our shared history. The only question left is whether we will sing that voice again, loud enough, in time, not as petitioners begging for crumbs from global powers, but as free people naming justice on our own terms.

In a high-profile gathering held in Kingston that brought together key stakeholders from across Jamaica’s agricultural and food sectors, the World Bank Group (WBG) has officially launched its landmark AgriConnect initiative, a global project designed to upgrade connectivity in rural communities, expand digital access for agricultural producers, and connect small-scale family farmers to formal national and international markets. The launch event was supported by the Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA), a long-standing regional partner for agricultural development across the Americas, and featured opening remarks from Jamaica’s Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Mining, Floyd Green.

Senior representatives from multiple international institutions joined the launch, including Lilia Burunciuc, Kent Coipel, Benoît Bosquet, and Diego Arias, who used the occasion to reaffirm the deep collaborative partnership between their organizations and shared commitment to advancing sustainable, inclusive agricultural growth across the Caribbean region. During opening discussions, attendees centered the critical function of family farming in Jamaica’s national food supply, while also openly addressing the long-standing structural challenges that have held the sector back.

The Jamaican launch of AgriConnect is just one component of the WBG’s broader global effort to modernize agrifood systems worldwide. The initiative has set an ambitious target to reach up to 300 million smallholder farmers across the globe by 2030, with the core goal of supporting producers to transition from low-yield subsistence farming to more productive, commercially viable operations that can generate stable incomes and lift rural communities out of poverty.

Minister Green framed the launch of AgriConnect as a transformative opportunity for Jamaica, noting that the initiative’s core vision aligns perfectly with the Jamaican government’s ongoing national efforts to build a more resilient, inclusive, and modern agricultural industry. He also did not shy away from outlining the unique challenges Jamaica faces: as a small open economy, the country struggles with limited access to affordable financing for small-scale producers. Like other Caribbean island nations, Jamaica is also on the frontlines of climate change, facing increasingly frequent and severe extreme weather events that threaten crop yields and disrupt production. At the same time, the country is working to shore up domestic food security and cut its heavy reliance on imported food products.

Speaking on behalf of IICA, Kent Coipel outlined the organization’s decades-long work supporting small and medium-sized agricultural producers across the Caribbean and Latin America. IICA’s core efforts focus on strengthening agricultural value chains, with targeted programming in producer training, export readiness, and expanding access to formal regional and global markets. “Strengthening the organizational capacity of rural communities is a fundamental pillar of IICA’s technical cooperation,” Coipel said during the event. He added that IICA has already supported critical grassroots initiatives in Jamaica, including helping to form and secure legal recognition for the Jamaican Network of Rural Women Producers, while also promoting cross-community knowledge sharing, professional networking, and improved governance for rural producer groups.

The two-day launch event featured structured working sessions that delved into practical solutions for key challenges facing Jamaican agriculture. One session explored actionable strategies to expand market access for small producers and boost efficiency across domestic food value chains, with insights from Derrick Deslandes, head of the College of Agriculture Science and Education, and industry leader Jacqueline Sharp. A second focused session centered on expanding small producers’ access to emerging agricultural technologies, and exploring the growing role of science and innovation in modernizing Jamaica’s agricultural sector. Contributors to that discussion included Winston Daes, Aura Cifuentes, and Arturo Ramírez, whose private sector firm develops specialized solutions for water management and alternative energy for agricultural operations.

Across the Americas, IICA is just one of several key international partners backing the World Bank’s AgriConnect initiative. Additional partners include regional development financial institutions, private sector agribusinesses, philanthropic foundations, and global agricultural knowledge organizations. The initiative has already rolled out key regional milestones this year: it was first showcased to stakeholders in Brazil, which is home to nearly four million family farmers, at an IICA office in March. The official regional launch for Latin America and the Caribbean followed in April in Washington, D.C., with participation from IICA Director General Muhammad Ibrahim and dozens of agriculture ministers from across the region.

Globally, the initiative is backed by an estimated $9 billion in annual financing, with the potential to mobilize an additional $5 billion in private and public investment for agricultural development. These resources are earmarked to strengthen innovation ecosystems, expand accessible financing mechanisms for small producers, and build out the support service infrastructure that smallholder farmers need to thrive.

The core concept for AgriConnect grew out of a 2023 expert panel convened by the World Bank, which identified agriculture and agribusiness as one of five global sectors with the greatest potential to absorb the large number of young people entering the global workforce over the next decade. Two core priorities anchor the initiative: first, reducing agricultural risk by boosting climate resilience for small producers and building stronger market risk management systems, and second, strengthening end-to-end value chains and accelerating the digital transformation of agriculture through the widespread adoption of digital tools, open access knowledge platforms, and modern production technologies.

According to IICA’s final summary of the launch, initiatives like AgriConnect are expected to drive greater social inclusion in the agricultural sector, boost the global competitiveness of small and medium-sized producers across the Americas, and support more equitable, sustainable rural development across the region in the coming decades.

To mark World Press Freedom Day 2026 on May 3, the International Labour Organization (ILO) has launched a groundbreaking new report that examines the underrecognized role of core labour rights in protecting journalists and media professionals across the globe. The report delivers a stark assessment of the escalating risks faced by media workers, shedding new light on the systemic threats that have plagued the industry for decades. According to official data published alongside the analysis, more than 1,850 journalists have been killed in the line of duty since 1993. Countless more have been subjected to arbitrary detention, forced disappearance, and routine intimidation. Alarmingly, the ILO confirms that the vast majority of these deadly attacks remain unsolved, allowing perpetrators to act with total impunity.

Physical violence is not the only threat facing modern media workers, the report emphasizes. Journalists now face a growing spectrum of hazards, from aggressive legal intimidation tactics designed to silence critical reporting to coordinated harassment and abuse across digital platforms. Women journalists, in particular, are disproportionately targeted by gendered digital threats that create a chilling effect on independent media.

The ILO’s analysis pushes beyond conventional conversations about press freedom, arguing that guaranteeing the safety of media workers requires far more than protecting freedom of expression alone. Instead, the report makes the case that universal access to fundamental labour rights is an equally, if not more, critical component of meaningful journalist protection. Within this framework, the publication explores how established core labour rights, paired with widely accepted international labour standards, can reinforce existing safety frameworks. It also outlines clear pathways for governments, media outlet owners, media worker unions, and industry representative bodies to collaborate on developing more robust, effective safety protocols for newsrooms and field reporting.

“Journalists are key defenders of human and labour rights,” noted Frank Hagemann, Director of Sectoral Policies at the ILO, in comments accompanying the report’s release. “They are also workers, and labour rights offer an important tool for protecting journalists at work.”

Beyond this new report, the ILO reaffirmed its longstanding commitment to advancing journalist safety globally through its participation in the United Nations Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity. First endorsed in 2012 by the United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination, the cross-institutional initiative was created to coordinate global action to address rising threats to media workers and end the culture of impunity that allows attacks on journalists to go unpunished. The full 588KB report is available for public download to support further industry and policy discussion on this critical issue.