标签： Cuba

The top diplomat of Cuba has used his social media platform on X to amplify new polling data that reveals shifting American public opinion toward the decades-long U.S. trade blockade against his country, urging the Biden administration to heed the growing discontent and reverse the long-standing punitive policy.

The Cuban foreign minister pointed out that 40% of U.S. adults now oppose the ongoing embargo, marking an 8-percentage-point rise in disapproval compared to previous measurements. He emphasized that this shifting trend reflects the will of a growing segment of the U.S. population, rather than the agenda of a small, hateful minority driven by warmongering. If the current U.S. administration were truly responsive to its own people’s views, he argued, it would immediately end what he called the criminal policy toward Cuba that inflicts mounting humanitarian harm on ordinary Cuban citizens.

The findings come from a recent public opinion survey conducted by YouGov, which also broke down attitudes by partisan affiliation. The poll makes clear that opposition to the blockade is far from a uniform position across the U.S. political spectrum, but it holds overwhelming support for ending the policy among two key blocs: 65% of Democratic respondents expressed disapproval of the blockade, compared to just 16% who support it. Among independent voters, 41% oppose the embargo versus 21% who back it. The only group where a majority still favors the policy is Republican voters, 63% of whom approve of the blockade while only 15% disapprove.

Beyond core attitudes toward the broader trade embargo, the survey captured additional insights into U.S. public opinion on related hardline policies. Nearly half of all respondents (46%) said they oppose, to varying degrees, the current U.S. policy that blocks oil shipments to Cuba from third-party countries. An even larger share of Americans — 61% — oppose any use of military force against Cuba.

Across partisan lines, the poll also found broad agreement on two key points: most U.S. citizens hold a positive view of the Cuban people, and a vast majority support restoring full diplomatic relations between the two neighboring countries, a stance that crosses party lines.

Cuba has formally reaffirmed its commitment to combating terrorism in all manifestations, citing its extensive history as a victim of externally orchestrated attacks. The Caribbean nation has implemented a robust legal and strategic framework to address ongoing security threats, particularly those originating from foreign soil.

Historical records indicate that over six decades, Cuba has endured numerous terrorist incidents including the bombing of Cubana de Aviación Flight 455 that killed 73 passengers, the La Coubre explosion, hotel bombings, and armed assaults on fishing vessels. These acts, predominantly organized and financed from United States territory, have frequently resulted in impunity for perpetrators despite Cuba’s presentation of evidence to international bodies.

In response, Cuba has ratified approximately twenty United Nations counterterrorism instruments and integrated these provisions into domestic law through Article 8 of its Constitution. The nation developed a Comprehensive National Strategy against Terrorism outlining prevention protocols, operational plans, and international cooperation mechanisms.

The 2022 Criminal Code amendment significantly strengthened penalties for terrorism-related offenses, establishing sentencing ranges from 10-30 years imprisonment to life sentences or capital punishment for extreme cases. The legal definition encompasses acts intended to coerce governments, international organizations, or terrorize populations through various means including hostage-taking, attacks on protected persons, and cyber terrorism.

Notably, the Code specifically criminalizes terrorism financing, addressing the collection, transportation, or provision of resources intended for terrorist activities. Judicial procedures mandate that convicted terrorists serve at least two-thirds of their sentence before parole eligibility, with no statute of limitations for prosecution and permanent criminal records for offenders.

Cuba’s Prosecutor General published an updated National List identifying 62 individuals and 20 entities based in the United States allegedly involved in organizing, financing, and executing terrorist acts against Cuba. This inventory, documented in 2025’s Resolution 13, represents Cuba’s implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1373 regarding counterterrorism obligations.

The government emphasized that despite ongoing threats, its revolutionary policy remains committed to preventing terrorism without exemption, including opposition to state-sponsored terrorism. Cuban authorities assert there will be no impunity for those involved in anti-Cuba terrorist activities.

HAVANA – In a powerful demonstration of global solidarity, over 600 delegates from 33 nations convened at the Cuban Institute of Friendship with the Peoples (ICAP) headquarters on March 21st for the “Our America to Cuba Convoy” welcoming ceremony. The event featured Cuba’s highest leadership, including President Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez, and became a platform for resounding condemnation of the six-decade US economic embargo against the Caribbean nation.

David Adler, co-general coordinator of Progressive International, set the tone by declaring: “Cuba has taught us what international solidarity means. We will never leave Cuba alone because fighting for Cuba is fighting for the right to self-determination of the peoples of the world.” Adler characterized the US blockade as a unique humanitarian crisis, asserting that convoy members represented millions globally who reject the policy of economic suffocation.

The gathering served three fundamental purposes, according to Adler: humanitarian support for a nation under unprecedented sanctions, defense of Cuba’s revolutionary achievements as a viable alternative to capitalism, and resistance against what participants termed “genocidal policies” of the US government.

Manolo de los Santos, executive director of The People’s Forum, praised Cuba’s resilience, stating: “This nation has given us the greatest lesson in what it means to create a true alternative to the horrors of capitalism and imperialism.” He explicitly labeled the blockade as “an act of genocide” for depriving Cubans of basic rights to life, peace, and normal international relations.

Brazilian student leader Bianca Borges, president of the National Union of Students of Brazil, framed the event as elevating “the banners of solidarity, anti-imperialism, hope, and sovereignty” against imperial domination. She emphasized that solidarity with Cuba remains fundamental for achieving a just, integrated Latin America free from foreign domination.

Fernando González Llort, Hero of the Republic and ICAP president, reaffirmed Cuba’s commitment to internationalist principles, telling attendees: “You represent the certainty that no imperial siege can ever imprison the dignity of our peoples. The homeland we defend is not a strip of land under siege—it is a piece of humanity that refuses to surrender.”

The ceremony concluded with participants vowing to combat media misinformation about Cuba upon returning to their home countries, positioning the convoy as the beginning of sustained international advocacy rather than a singular event.

A coordinated campaign of destabilization emerges from Miami whenever diplomatic progress appears between the United States and Cuba, according to recent investigative findings. Hardline elements with financial and political investments in maintaining hostilities have repeatedly demonstrated willingness to sabotage peace initiatives through calculated acts of provocation.

The pattern became particularly evident during recent bilateral talks held in St. Kitts and Nevis, where representatives from Washington and Havana engaged in unprecedented dialogue. Simultaneously, a group of ten individuals allegedly trained and armed in Florida executed an attack on a Cuban Border Guard vessel attempting to infiltrate Villa Clara’s northern coast. This synchronization suggests deliberate timing to undermine diplomatic efforts.

Further evidence of coordination emerged through graffiti campaigns across Havana’s municipalities, where more than a dozen individuals recruited in Panama executed counterrevolutionary messaging using rented vehicles. These actions appeared designed to manufacture the illusion of widespread popular discontent rather than organic demonstrations.

The strategy employs multiple fronts: congressional lobbying for intensified blockade measures, media campaigns promoting misinformation, and financial support for destabilization activities. Investigations indicate that recent acts of vandalism in Morón, including arson attacks on media outlets and destruction of property, follow patterns consistent with external direction rather than genuine civil protest.

South Florida-based operatives have openly advocated for aggressive measures against Cuba, with one congressman reportedly using language suggesting annihilation rather than diplomatic engagement. The consistent pattern reveals a well-funded machinery dedicated to perpetuating conflict through economic strangulation and manufactured unrest, directly contradicting ongoing governmental efforts toward normalized relations.

The Cuban government has issued a strong condemnation of Costa Rica’s unexpected decision to shutter its embassy in Havana and downgrade diplomatic relations. The move, communicated via diplomatic note on March 17th without prior consultation or justification, represents a significant deterioration in bilateral ties between the two nations.

According to Cuba’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Costa Rican officials invoked an ‘alleged and unfounded principle of reciprocity’ when demanding that Cuba withdraw its diplomatic staff from San José while maintaining only consular and administrative personnel. The Central American nation further notified that effective April 1st, it would maintain relations with Cuba strictly at the consular level.

The Cuban statement particularly criticized Costa Rican President Rodrigo Chaves Robles for what it characterized as ‘disrespectful statements’ made during a March 18th press conference. Cuban authorities accused Chaves of ‘crudely manipulating the history and reality of Cuba’ while ignoring the documented impact of the U.S. economic blockade on Cuba’s economic situation and living conditions—a fact previously acknowledged by Costa Rican governments.

Havana described the decision as ‘arbitrary’ and ‘evidently adopted under pressure,’ suggesting it disregarded both national interests and regional solidarity. The Cuban government framed this development as Costa Rica’s latest alignment with U.S. policy objectives against Cuba, noting the country’s ‘history of subordination to U.S. policy against Cuba.’

The statement positioned the embassy closure as part of a broader U.S. offensive to isolate Cuba within the Americas, making Costa Rica ‘a participant in its aggressive escalation against the Cuban Revolution.’ Despite these diplomatic tensions, Cuba expressed confidence that the move would ultimately fail, emphasizing the ‘unbreakable bonds’ between the Cuban and Costa Rican peoples, historically connected through figures like independence heroes José Martí and Antonio Maceo.

The diplomatic note was formally released from Havana on March 18th, 2026, marking a new chapter in the complex relationship between the two American nations.

Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez has issued a stark warning through social media channels, declaring that the nation stands prepared to mount formidable resistance against any external aggressor confronting the Caribbean island. The First Secretary of the Communist Party of Cuba articulated this position while addressing what he characterized as daily threats from the United States aimed at overthrowing Cuba’s constitutional order.

President Díaz-Canel condemned what he described as six decades of economic warfare against Cuba, asserting that Washington utilizes Cuba’s economic difficulties—which he attributes directly to U.S. policies—as justification for further hostility. He framed these actions as collective punishment against the Cuban people orchestrated by an empire seeking to seize national resources and undermine sovereignty.

The Cuban head of state’s sentiments were reinforced by Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla, who serves on the Political Bureau of the Communist Party. Rodríguez echoed the administration’s stance, emphasizing that neither economic blockade nor energy embargo would compromise Cuba’s exercise of sovereignty or diminish the creativity of its people in overcoming challenges.

Both officials presented a unified front regarding Cuba’s determination to preserve independence, with Rodríguez asserting that any act of imperialist aggression would confront the indomitable will of the Cuban population in defending their homeland. The statements emerge amid ongoing tensions between the two nations despite periodic diplomatic engagements.