博客

In a bombshell announcement delivered to Trinidad and Tobago’s Parliament this week, Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar has opened the door to a full criminal investigation into Keith Scotland, an Opposition Member of Parliament and senior counsel, over allegations of corruption, malfeasance, and conspiracy to defraud connected to a multi-million-dollar uncollected utility debt case. The allegations center around a years-long dispute between state-owned energy provider Trinidad and Tobago Electricity Commission (T&TEC) and Flavorite Foods Ltd., a food processing firm chaired by Andre Monteil, a former treasurer of the opposition People’s National Movement (PNM).

According to the Prime Minister’s detailed account, Flavorite Foods accumulated more than $2.39 million in unpaid electricity bills between April 2017, when the arrears began to accrue, and January 2022, when the company was finally permanently disconnected from the power grid. The arrears built up steadily over that five-year window: by April 2019, the company owed roughly $572,000, despite multiple negotiated payment plans that Flavorite repeatedly breached. Even after a temporary disconnection that year, power was surprisingly restored the same day without any payment being applied to the outstanding balance. T&TEC continued to tolerate repeated missed payments for nearly three more years, cutting off service permanently only when the total debt crossed the $2.4 million threshold in January 2022.

Nine months after the permanent disconnection, T&TEC moved to recover the lost funds by retaining legal services from Scotland’s Virtus Chambers, specifically contracting Scotland and junior attorney Keisha Kydd-Hannibal to pursue the claim. The legal firm filed an initial High Court claim for the full $2.4 million in December 2022, but for 11 months, T&TEC’s legal team received no substantive updates despite repeated requests for information. When a meeting was finally scheduled in October 2023, Kydd-Hannibal only stated that Flavorite’s legal team had requested an extension to file a defense, offering no explanation for why Scotland had not moved to secure a default judgment after the required legal window elapsed, and refusing to disclose basic details including the identity of Flavorite’s legal representation.

Court rules require a defendant to enter an appearance and file a defense within eight days of being served a claim, but Prime Minister Persad-Bissessar confirmed that no appearance or defense was ever submitted by Flavorite. Rather than proceeding with a default judgment as required, Scotland’s chambers advised that the claim would be refiled due to the unexplained delays, and a second claim for the same amount was submitted in September 2023. For another year, T&TEC continued to push for updates, with Scotland’s chambers repeatedly assuring the utility that a default judgment application had been filed and was being processed by court staff. As recently as November 2024, the firm confirmed the application had been withdrawn and refiled to address procedural issues.

The entire scheme unraveled earlier this year, when T&TEC’s own attorneys directly requested confirmation from the Supreme Court Registrar as to whether any default judgment applications had ever been filed in either the 2022 or 2023 claims. In responses dated April 2026, Registrar Antonya Pierre confirmed that no such applications existed on court record for either case. A subsequent follow-up check by Registrar Dion Phillip in June 2026 reaffirmed the finding: thorough searches showed no default judgment requests had ever been submitted, and there was no evidence that the claim had ever been formally served to Flavorite Foods at all.

As a result of the delays caused by the false representations from Scotland’s chambers, the Prime Minister confirmed, the entire $2.4 million claim has now become statute-barred, meaning the debt can no longer be pursued through the courts, leaving Trinidad and Tobago taxpayers on the hook for millions in lost public funds.

In response to the findings, Persad-Bissessar has already ordered two parallel actions to hold those involved accountable. First, she has instructed Minister of Public Utilities Barry Padarath to direct T&TEC to file a civil lawsuit against Scotland and his chambers, alleging fraudulent misrepresentation, professional negligence, and breach of contract over the botched debt recovery effort. Second, the Prime Minister has ordered that a formal disciplinary complaint be prepared for submission to the Law Association of Trinidad and Tobago’s Disciplinary Committee, alleging violations of the professional Code of Conduct laid out in the country’s Legal Profession Act. Most notably, a formal report has already been filed with the national Fraud Squad, which will now lead a criminal investigation to determine whether conspiracy to defraud, malfeasance, and corruption charges are warranted against Scotland.

As of the announcement, media outlets have been unable to reach Andre Monteil for comment on the allegations, and Scotland has not yet issued a public response to the Prime Minister’s claims in Parliament.

A high-stakes political clash has erupted in Trinidad and Tobago after Opposition Member of Parliament for Port of Spain South Keith Scotland, SC, issued a bold public challenge to Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar, demanding she repeat damaging allegations about his professional conduct in a high-profile legal case outside the protection of parliamentary privilege.

Speaking to journalists outside Parliament this week, flanked by fellow Opposition lawmakers, Scotland pushed back forcefully against claims the Prime Minister leveled during a House of Representatives debate on the Standing Finance Committee’s adoption report. The allegations center on Scotland’s legal work handling a debt claim brought by the state-owned Trinidad and Tobago Electricity Commission (T&TEC) against local company Flavorite Foods Ltd. Scotland has labeled the Prime Minister’s remarks “very egregious attacks” on his professional reputation and firmly denied any misconduct in the case.

After reviewing the Prime Minister’s claims in the hours following the parliamentary debate, Scotland systematically refuted each allegation, laying out clear documentary evidence to back his denial of wrongdoing. The case hinges on whether proper legal procedures were followed for T&TEC’s claim against Flavorite Foods, and Scotland outlined three core points to support his position.

First, he confirmed there is no official documentation that bears his signature confirming any required court filing was never submitted to the court. Second, he rejected the claim that the case was invalid due to exceeding the statutory limitation period, noting that the claim was officially refiled with the court in 2024, and the court has already stamped a request for entry of default judgment after Flavorite Foods failed to enter a formal response to the claim. Scotland also pointed out that Trinidad and Tobago’s courts suspended all statutory limitation periods for two years during the COVID-19 pandemic, a critical legal detail he says the Prime Minister overlooked in her allegations.

Scotland explained that after his legal team completed the initial refiling and default judgment application, the client took over the case files, meaning any subsequent developments are not the responsibility of his team. He also noted that he suspended his active legal practice during a previous term serving in the country’s Cabinet, further clarifying the timeline of his involvement.

The Opposition MP stressed that he holds full documentary proof to corroborate every part of his account, including court records confirming the refiled claim, the submitted default judgment application, and an official query from the court registrar addressing outstanding procedural points in the judgment filing — information that has not previously been made public. Scotland accused the ruling government of orchestrating the attacks to damage his reputation in retaliation for his ongoing public criticism of injustice facing Trinbagonian citizens and parliamentary staff, vowing that the efforts to silence him would not succeed.

“They will not silence my voice with attacks on my character, attacks on me and, by extension, my family,” Scotland said, adding that he would continue to speak out against unfair treatment of the public. “I want to set the record straight. What we will not do is that I will not be silenced. I will stand against injustice meted out against any parliamentary staff, meted out against people of Trinidad and Tobago.”

Responding to questions about whether all required procedural steps were completed before he ended his active involvement in the case, Scotland confirmed that to his knowledge, all initial issues with the claim were resolved, the claim was refiled within the legally allowed timeframe, and the default judgment application was properly submitted. He also noted that he plans to reach out directly to T&TEC leadership to clarify the full details of the case and resolve any lingering confusion.

A contentious confrontation between the ruling United National Congress (UNC) and opposition People’s National Movement (PNM) has erupted in Trinidad and Tobago following a heated Standing Finance Committee meeting last Friday, centered on a photograph taken by Government Business Leader Barry Padarath of a parliamentary audio technician. The incident has escalated into a broader political firestorm, with accusations of intimidation, institutional overreach, and even seditious racial rhetoric flying between the two major parties.

Speaking to reporters outside the Port of Spain Parliament building on Abercromby Street one day after the clash, Padarath, who also serves as the Member of Parliament for Couva South, pushed back hard against claims that his decision to photograph the technician was intended to intimidate parliamentary staff. He explained that the snapshot was taken solely for identification purposes, rooted in a simmering dispute over alleged improper muting of government lawmakers’ microphones during proceedings.

During the Friday committee session, UNC government representatives raised formal complaints that their microphones had been cut off unexpectedly while they were attempting to speak. Padarath subsequently approached the technical staff member responsible for managing the chamber’s audio system and captured the photograph. The interaction immediately devolved into shouting matches between government and opposition lawmakers across the floor of the House of Representatives, turning a routine committee meeting into a high-stakes partisan standoff.

Padarath defended his choice to photograph the staff member, noting that identification is a required step for any formal complaint brought before Parliament’s Broadcasting Committee. “It is the only way that we can identify them, because we don’t know the staff of the Parliament,” he told reporters. He stressed that the act was never meant to function as an intimidation tactic: “It was meant just to identify where the possible challenges are, so when we go to the Broadcasting Committee, we can say, ‘Well, these are the technicians. These are the persons who were muting the mics at that point in time.’”

Pressed on the combative tone his party has taken in Parliament amid the ongoing dispute, Padarath rejected any suggestion that the UNC’s approach was inappropriate. “Politics is not a tea party; the war is on and the UNC will not roll over and play dead,” he stated. He added that the ruling party has endured unfair treatment and biased procedural practices for far too long, and that the incident was simply meant to draw public attention to ongoing problems inside and outside the legislature.

The Couva South MP also dismissed opposition demands for a criminal investigation into his conduct, arguing that PNM lawmakers were only using the incident as a distraction from inflammatory comments made by one of their own colleagues. He fired back by calling for a criminal probe into PNM MP Kareem Marcelle, questioning whether Marcelle’s recent remarks amounted to sedition.

The comments in question date back to a PNM public rally held Thursday night at the Laventille Community Centre, where Marcelle accused the UNC-led government of using the “PNM” label as a racial slur targeting Afro-Trinidadians. Marcelle declared at the rally: “They don’t like we, and they will never like we. But I want them to know that we don’t like them and we will never like them.” He went further, claiming that “Whenever they say ‘PNM people’ on social media, to me, it is the new N-word. They hate African people. They hate black people…A bunch of racist clowns in this country.”

Over the weekend, Padarath doubled down on his position, saying he was “ready for war” and accusing the PNM of deflecting attention from what he labeled Marcelle’s “racist and seditious” comments.

PNM MP Stuart Young, representing Port of Spain North/St Ann’s West, pushed back against Padarath’s framing during his own press briefing outside Parliament Monday. Young questioned the meaning of Padarath’s repeated “war” rhetoric, asking: “Is it a war against public servants? Is it a war against independent parliamentary staff? That is the question that needs to be asked.”

Young said he was speaking on behalf of all “civic-minded and right-thinking citizens of Trinidad and Tobago” to condemn any and all attacks on non-partisan parliamentary staff and public servants. He noted that all elected parliamentarians have a duty to uphold the standards of public office, even within the inherently adversarial structure of the Westminster parliamentary system.

While Young acknowledged that robust partisan clash is a normal part of legislative debate, he argued that Friday’s incident crossed a fundamental line. “What we saw on Friday is not in that category. Parliamentarians on either side of the aisle thrusting against each other is expected,” he said. “That was a line crossed.”

Addressing the core complaint of improper mic muting, Young clarified that the audio system operates according to long-standing, standard parliamentary procedure. “Once a person has the floor, that is the person whose mic is going to be on. The Speaker will stand up, the Speaker’s mic will be on and everybody’s mic is off; so it is whoever has the floor and command of the floor and it is their turn to speak,” he explained. “Everybody’s mic can’t be turned on at the same time, so there’s absolutely nothing abnormal with that.”

Young concluded by accusing the current ruling UNC of exploiting procedural questions to force their uninvited comments onto the official parliamentary record, a practice he said runs counter to established legislative norms.

In a fiery address to Trinidad and Tobago’s Parliament during a vote to approve the Standing Finance Committee’s report, Attorney General John Jeremie launched a scathing attack on the prior People’s National Movement (PNM) administration, accusing it of wasting $1 million in public funds on a premature, extravagant opening ceremony for the Port of Spain General Hospital’s new Central Block back in March 2025.

Jeremie detailed that the event, which drew three-quarters of the former PNM cabinet, centered on unnecessary luxury spending that included cheese paste and champagne, even as the facility remained wholly unequipped to deliver even the most basic patient care. At the time of the high-profile opening, he explained, the Central Block only held a certificate of practical project completion—a designation that meant full operational readiness was still far from achieved. More than 10,000 pieces of medical equipment had yet to be installed, plumbing infrastructure remained unfinished, rendering all restrooms unusable, and the building held no beds, no stock of medications, not even common over-the-counter pain relievers like Panadol for event attendees who might have fallen ill. Construction on the structure would drag on for months after the ceremony concluded, Jeremie added.

Beyond the hospital spending controversy, the Attorney General pinned the blame for recent international credit and economic downgrades for Trinidad and Tobago squarely on the PNM’s previous term in office. He defended the current United National Congress (UNC) administration’s economic management, arguing that the former finance minister Colm Imbert and his colleagues were responsible for the country’s ongoing economic challenges. Jeremie also pushed back against opposition criticism of the current government’s new fiscal measures, clarifying that recent increased penalties across multiple sectors are not new taxes, but enforcement penalties for violations of the law. He accused the PNM opposition of deliberately spreading misinformation to stoke public fear and anger toward the ruling administration.

Jeremie also used the parliamentary address to reinforce the current government’s commitment to equal application of the law, stating that no person—regardless of their social status, political connections, or ties to powerful institutions like banks or former prime ministers—is above the law. He contrasted this with what he claimed was the PNM’s long-standing culture of applying different rules to people based on their connections, adding that the opposition’s default response to policy disagreement is to incite unrest rather than engage in constructive debate.

The Attorney General claimed that recent attempts at unrest have included collaborations between opposition-aligned elements and two notorious local gangs, known as Sixx and Seven, to stir up public disorder. He closed by reiterating his accusation that opposition lawmakers have spread ignorance and stoked dangerous social tension in recent debates, with one unnamed opposition representative engaging in particularly “loathsome and repugnant” rhetoric to drive division.