分类: world

  • U.S. and Israel Attack Iran, Trump Says “Bombs Will be Dropping Everywhere”

    U.S. and Israel Attack Iran, Trump Says “Bombs Will be Dropping Everywhere”

    In a dramatic escalation of Middle East tensions, the United States and Israel launched coordinated military operations against Iranian targets on February 28, 2026. The strikes, targeting senior Iranian military leadership, prompted immediate retaliatory missile attacks across the region, creating one of the most perilous security situations in recent years.

    According to Reuters reports, Iranian defense systems engaged incoming projectiles as explosions were documented in multiple countries. Iranian state media claimed at least 40 casualties from an airstrike on a school facility, though these figures remain unverified through independent channels. Three confidential sources confirmed the deaths of Iran’s defense minister and a high-ranking Revolutionary Guards commander in Israeli operations.

    The operation, codenamed “Operation Epic Fury” by the Pentagon, specifically targeted Iranian leadership following the collapse of nuclear negotiations earlier this week. In a video address via Truth Social, U.S. President Donald Trump characterized the mission as necessary to prevent Iranian nuclear weapon development and eliminate “immediate threats.”

    “Bombs will be dropping everywhere,” President Trump declared, advising Iranian citizens to seek shelter while simultaneously encouraging them to overthrow their governing authorities. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu similarly suggested the military action might empower Iranian citizens to “take their destiny into their own hands.”

    Iran’s Revolutionary Guards issued a stern warning that all U.S. bases and regional interests remain vulnerable to continued retaliation, condemning the initial strikes as unlawful aggression. Defense systems reportedly intercepted numerous missiles directed toward Israel and several Gulf nations hosting U.S. military installations.

  • Iran vuurt raketten af op Golfstaten: dode in Abu Dhabi, internationale reacties op escalatie

    Iran vuurt raketten af op Golfstaten: dode in Abu Dhabi, internationale reacties op escalatie

    The Middle East witnessed a significant escalation in regional tensions on Saturday as Iran launched coordinated rocket attacks against multiple Gulf states in retaliation for previous American and Israeli airstrikes. The offensive marks a dangerous expansion of conflict into a region traditionally known for its relative stability and security.

    Abu Dhabi confirmed at least one fatality from the attacks, with officials reporting powerful explosions and thick plumes of smoke across multiple neighborhoods. Bahrain announced that a service center belonging to the US Fifth Fleet had been directly hit, while eyewitnesses described scenes of gray smoke rising amid blaring sirens.

    Several nations successfully intercepted incoming rockets before they reached their territories. Kuwait, Qatar, and Jordan activated defense systems to neutralize threats, while residents in Doha reported multiple explosions throughout the capital. Initially, many citizens continued daily activities until official warnings urged sheltering indoors, resulting in dramatically reduced street presence and traffic flow.

    International aviation authorities responded by closing airspace across the Middle East, with flight tracking data revealing virtually empty skies above Iran and surrounding nations.

    The international community expressed grave concerns through multiple channels. The European Union described the situation as “deeply worrying” and called for maximum restraint from all parties, emphasizing civilian protection and adherence to international law. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President António Costa jointly stressed the critical importance of calm and diplomatic engagement.

    The International Red Cross Committee warned of a “dangerous chain reaction” of military violence potentially devastating civilian populations. President Mirjana Spoljaric urged nations to respect rules of engagement and demonstrate political will to prevent further casualties and destruction.

    Oman, serving as primary mediator in US-Iran negotiations, expressed concern about the violence, with Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi warning that escalation serves neither US interests nor global peace, urging Washington to avoid deeper entanglement.

    France announced plans to convene an emergency UN Security Council meeting, with President Emmanuel Macron labeling the escalation dangerous and calling on Iran to negotiate “in good faith” regarding nuclear and ballistic missile programs to prevent regional destabilization.

    Qatar condemned the attacks on its territory—where the US Al Udeid Air Base is located—as a flagrant violation of sovereignty and direct threat to national security, reserving its right to respond under international law.

    The UAE denounced the attacks in “the strongest terms,” characterizing them as “dangerous escalation” and “cowardly acts” threatening civilian safety. Bahrain similarly described the Fifth Fleet attack as “treacherous,” while Kuwait warned that further escalation would deepen regional instability.

    Saudi Arabia issued its strongest condemnation of the attacks and warned of serious consequences. Pakistan joined in condemning the violence while calling for immediate de-escalation through resumed diplomatic negotiations.

    Russia accused the US of masking military actions behind nuclear talks and urged the international community to objectively assess “irresponsible actions” further destabilizing the region.

    Ukraine held Iran responsible for the escalation, referencing Tehran’s harsh crackdown on protests earlier this year. Norway stated that Israel’s preventive attack violated international law without demonstrating immediate threat requirements.

    Belgium lamented that diplomatic efforts failed to achieve earlier resolution, emphasizing that the Iranian people should not bear the cost of their government’s policies.

  • Condemnation Continues as US strikes Iran

    Condemnation Continues as US strikes Iran

    International outrage has intensified following a confirmed joint military operation by the United States and Israel that resulted in the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The coordinated airstrikes, targeting strategic locations across Iran overnight, have reportedly claimed over 200 lives and triggered immediate retaliatory measures from Tehran.

    The operation marks a severe escalation in Middle Eastern tensions, with Iran launching counterstrikes against US military installations throughout the region, including bases in the United Arab Emirates. Circulating visual evidence indicates substantial damage to infrastructure in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Qatar, with civilian structures such as homes and hotels among affected facilities.

    Diplomatic channels have erupted with condemnations from global leaders and international bodies. African Union Commission Chairperson Mahmoud Ali Youssouf denounced the actions as ‘clear violations of sovereignty and territorial integrity,’ warning of further regional destabilization. The United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres addressed an emergency Security Council session, emphasizing that the military actions ‘undermine international peace and security’ and contravene UN Charter principles prohibiting force against territorial integrity.

    Notably, Trinidad and Tobago’s government faced scrutiny after initially appearing to endorse the US operation before retracting its statement and adopting a more neutral position regarding the evolving crisis. Meanwhile, Qatar’s embassy in the Dominican Republic confirmed its leadership is collaborating with international partners to address the escalating situation.

    This military confrontation occurs against the backdrop of ongoing diplomatic negotiations concerning Iran’s nuclear program, casting serious doubt on the future of these critical talks. Security analysts warn that the elimination of Iran’s supreme leader combined with cross-border retaliatory strikes creates a precarious situation with potential global ramifications, urging immediate de-escalation efforts to prevent broader regional conflict.

  • US and Israel launch strikes on Iran, Tehran responds with regional atacks

    US and Israel launch strikes on Iran, Tehran responds with regional atacks

    In a significant escalation of Middle Eastern tensions, the United States and Israel executed a series of coordinated military operations targeting Iran in the early hours of Saturday. The Israeli Defense Forces confirmed that this large-scale offensive was the culmination of extensive joint strategic planning between the two allied nations. High-value targets reportedly included Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, President Ebrahim Raisi, and senior military command officials.

    U.S. authorities, speaking to CNN on condition of anonymity, indicated that the American campaign is projected to extend over several days with subsequent strikes already in preparation. Former President Donald Trump characterized the operation as both ‘massive and ongoing,’ while issuing a stark warning about potential American casualties. In a public address, Trump called upon Iranian citizens to ‘take over your government,’ alleging that Tehran had resumed efforts to reconstruct its nuclear capabilities following previous U.S. airstrikes that allegedly incapacitated critical infrastructure last summer. Iranian authorities have persistently denied these allegations, maintaining their nuclear program serves exclusively peaceful civilian purposes.

    Iran responded with immediate and forceful retaliation, launching an unprecedented barrage of missile and drone attacks against Israeli territory and American assets throughout the region. Security officials reported detonations across multiple nations including the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Qatar, demonstrating the conflict’s rapid regional expansion beyond the initial belligerents.

    This exchange of offensive operations represents one of the most perilous military confrontations in recent history, generating grave concerns among international observers about the potential emergence of a broader regional war. Geopolitical analysts caution that multilateral involvement could severely destabilize the Persian Gulf region and potentially disrupt global energy markets due to the area’s crucial oil production and shipping lanes.

    The situation remains fluid with ongoing developments expected as military and diplomatic actions continue to unfold.

  • Internationale reacties op VS-Israël aanval op Iran: toenemende spanningen, oproep tot kalmte

    Internationale reacties op VS-Israël aanval op Iran: toenemende spanningen, oproep tot kalmte

    A coordinated military operation conducted by United States and Israeli forces against Iranian targets early Saturday has triggered international condemnation and significantly heightened geopolitical tensions across the Middle East. Dubbed ‘Operation Epic Fury,’ the offensive targeted Iran’s nuclear facilities and military infrastructure, prompting immediate retaliatory measures from Tehran and drawing sharp responses from global powers.

    The United Nations and European Union issued urgent calls for restraint and diplomatic engagement following the attacks. UN Secretary-General António Guterres emphasized the critical importance of adhering to international law and avoiding further escalation, while EU representatives expressed deep concern that military action could undermine ongoing diplomatic efforts.

    Russia and China delivered particularly strong condemnations of the operation. Moscow characterized the strikes as ‘an irresponsible provocation that unnecessarily exacerbates regional tensions,’ while Beijing warned that such military actions ‘seriously undermine Middle Eastern stability’ and urged immediate return to dialogue.

    The military confrontation has triggered significant security responses across the Gulf region. Multiple nations have enhanced their military readiness, implemented temporary flight restrictions, and canceled commercial air traffic as precautionary measures. Bahrain’s American Fifth Fleet service center reportedly sustained damage from rocket attacks, while Israel temporarily closed its airspace to civilian flights.

    Iranian leadership, including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and President Masoud Pezeshkian, were specifically mentioned as targets, though the extent of impact remains unclear. Tehran has responded with missile and drone strikes against Israeli positions and issued threats toward American interests throughout the region.

    Political leaders from the attacking nations defended their actions. U.S. President Donald Trump characterized the operation as ‘necessary for American security’ and encouraged Iranian citizens to ‘reclaim their leadership when appropriate conditions are established.’ Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu framed the offensive as an opportunity for Iranians to ‘cast off the yoke of tyranny.’

    The confrontation follows months of strained diplomatic negotiations between Washington and Tehran regarding Iran’s nuclear program. While Iran had demonstrated willingness to make concessions in exchange for sanctions relief, it consistently refused limitations on its ballistic missile development.

    In the aftermath, Iran has announced plans to accelerate its missile program and implement additional military countermeasures. State media reports indicate new missile tests have been conducted and the Revolutionary Guard has been placed on heightened alert.

    The UN Security Council has convened an emergency session to address the crisis, with numerous member states advocating for immediate cessation of hostilities and resumption of diplomatic talks. The EU has announced additional sanctions targeting specific Iranian military entities while simultaneously calling for de-escalation.

    Regional economic implications have already emerged, with global oil prices experiencing significant increases following the attacks. Analysts warn that prolonged conflict could have far-reaching consequences for energy security and geopolitical stability worldwide. Both the U.S. and Israel have indicated readiness for further military action should Iran continue what they term ‘aggressive activities’ and nuclear weapons development, even as diplomatic efforts toward a new nuclear agreement continue despite diminishing prospects for swift resolution.

  • VS en Israël vallen Iran aan; Iran reageert met raket- en droneaanvallen

    VS en Israël vallen Iran aan; Iran reageert met raket- en droneaanvallen

    The Middle East has plunged into heightened military confrontation following coordinated pre-dawn offensive operations by United States and Israeli forces against multiple Iranian targets. This escalation marks a significant deterioration in regional stability, transforming long-simmering tensions into open warfare.

    According to verified international reports, the joint military campaign struck strategic locations across Iran including the capital Tehran and major urban centers such as Isfahan, Qom, and Karaj. The operation specifically targeted Iran’s long-range missile capabilities and nuclear infrastructure, which Western intelligence agencies have repeatedly identified as threats to regional security.

    US President Donald Trump characterized the mission as “major combat operations” designed to eliminate imminent security threats and prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. The administration emphasized that these measures were necessary to protect American allies and maintain stability in the volatile region.

    Iran responded with immediate countermeasures, launching missile and drone attacks against Israeli positions. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps confirmed these retaliatory strikes, labeling the initial assault as “hostile criminal aggression.” Residents in northern Israel reported audible explosions and anti-aircraft activity as the Israeli Defense Forces intercepted incoming projectiles. Civil defense sirens were activated across multiple regions, prompting civilians to seek shelter.

    The rapid exchange of hostilities has raised concerns among international observers about potential further escalation, with diplomatic channels working urgently to de-escalate the situation before it evolves into a broader regional conflict.

  • Fietsboom in Havana door Amerikaanse brandstofblokkade

    Fietsboom in Havana door Amerikaanse brandstofblokkade

    Havana’s streets are witnessing an unprecedented transportation transformation as Cubans increasingly turn to bicycles amid a severe fuel shortage crisis. The shift comes as direct consequences of tightened U.S. sanctions that have disrupted oil supplies from Venezuela and other traditional sources.

    The current situation stems from January 2026 when the United States arrested Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, effectively cutting off Cuba’s primary oil supply that had sustained the island nation for over a quarter-century. Subsequent American threats against oil-exporting nations have further constrained deliveries from Mexico and other potential suppliers.

    This energy crisis has forced Havana residents to adopt innovative survival strategies. Across the city, people are retrieving long-stored bicycles from storage, repairing worn tires, and even learning to ride for the first time. The movement represents both practical adaptation and symbolic resistance to economic pressures that have made traditional transportation increasingly unaffordable.

    Transportation costs have tripled in recent months, compelling citizens like 23-year-old Gabriela Barbon to embrace cycling. ‘Cycling is no longer a hobby, it’s a necessity,’ she remarked during a training session with local organization Citykleta. Their ‘Learn to Pedal’ campaign has seen overwhelming response, attracting nearly four times the expected participants.

    The trend has created parallel economic opportunities and challenges. Bicycle repair shops like that of Pedro Carrillo report an ‘explosion’ in business, though they simultaneously face shortages of replacement parts. ‘Sometimes I don’t have what people need—those supplies are nowhere to be found,’ Carrillo noted from his sidewalk workshop.

    Meanwhile, the Cuban government is implementing emergency measures including investments in solar energy and other renewable sources. International aid organizations attempt to provide humanitarian assistance, though political tensions and the ongoing embargo continue to limit their effectiveness.

    According to United Nations reports, food security remains critically compromised while energy supplies stay unreliable. The six-decade American embargo, recently intensified under the Trump administration, continues to weigh heavily on Cuba’s economic stability.

    Despite these challenges, the bicycle phenomenon demonstrates Cuban resilience. As resident Yoandris Herrera explains while preparing to transport his children to school: ‘Fuel is now so expensive, cycling is simply more practical.’ This two-wheeled revolution represents both immediate practical solution and powerful symbol of adaptation in difficult times.

  • Dominican Republic : Over $300M to build an economic wall on the border

    Dominican Republic : Over $300M to build an economic wall on the border

    In a landmark address to Congress commemorating the nation’s 182nd Independence Anniversary on February 27, 2026, Dominican President Luis Abinader unveiled a transformative economic strategy for the Haitian border region. The centerpiece of this initiative is a network of dry ports, representing a private investment exceeding $300 million, which will operate under a free trade zone framework. President Abinader characterized this endeavor as “the most important logistics project ever conceived” for the area, emphasizing its role as a strategic state decision to enhance national sovereignty through economic development and improved competitiveness.

    The President drew a clear distinction between physical and economic border security, stating that while the country “already has a border wall to protect its territory,” this new infrastructure would establish “a true economic wall.” The dry ports are designed to achieve multiple objectives: revitalizing economically marginalized border provinces, facilitating legitimate cross-border commerce, strengthening formal trade relations with Haiti, and decisively dismantling extensive smuggling networks that have long plagued the region.

    Abinader cited successful implementations of similar dry port models in other border contexts, specifically referencing the Mexico-United States experience. He noted that these facilities have demonstrated effectiveness in centralizing customs operations, formalizing trade channels, and transforming entire regions into vibrant economic development hubs. The President articulated a comprehensive philosophy of border security, asserting that “There can be no stability where informality reigns. Security is not achieved solely through surveillance; It also involves job creation, trade organization, and the generation of real opportunities.”

    Supplementary analysis indicates that dry ports function as inland logistics platforms with direct connections to seaports via rail, road, or river transport. These facilities extend the services of coastal ports inland by providing comprehensive customs clearance, storage capabilities, and container transshipment services, thereby alleviating congestion in port areas while improving transportation efficiency to both consumption centers and production facilities.

  • Dominican Republic : Births by Haitian mothers down 41%

    Dominican Republic : Births by Haitian mothers down 41%

    A stringent immigration verification protocol implemented by the Dominican Republic has precipitated a dramatic 41% reduction in births to Haitian mothers within its public healthcare facilities. Enacted on April 21, 2025, the policy mandates status checks in hospitals, fundamentally altering access to maternity services for the Haitian community.

    Official data reveals a stark decline from 32,967 recorded births to Haitian mothers in 2024 to just 19,434 in 2025. This represents a drop of 13,533 births across the nation’s 33 public hospitals. The policy’s impact was immediate and profound; within its first full month of implementation (May 2025), births plummeted to 849, a figure that remained consistently low throughout the year. Monthly totals for the remainder of 2025—including 886 in June, 902 in July, and a peak of just 1,430 in September—demonstrated a reduction of more than fifty percent compared to pre-protocol figures.

    The downward trajectory has persisted into 2026. January 2026 saw 1,114 births, a number drastically lower than the 3,048 recorded in January 2024 and also below the 3,023 births that had been projected for that month prior to the policy’s enactment.

    Geographic analysis of the data indicates a concentration of remaining births in border regions experiencing significant migration flows. Hospitals in Verón (La Altagracia province) recorded 628 Haitian births, followed by Rosa Duarte in Elías Piña (406), and Elio Fiallo in Pedernales (342). Conversely, numerous provinces—including La Vega, María Trinidad Sánchez, Monte Plata, and Santo Domingo—now report very low rates of births to Haitian mothers, signaling the widespread effectiveness of the border control measure.

  • Op-ed: Latin America and the Caribbean advances in the fight to eradicate hunger: a challenge that admits no pauses

    Op-ed: Latin America and the Caribbean advances in the fight to eradicate hunger: a challenge that admits no pauses

    The Latin America and Caribbean region has achieved a remarkable milestone in its ongoing battle against food insecurity, with undernourishment rates declining for the fourth consecutive year according to the latest United Nations data. The 2025 Regional Overview of Food Security and Nutrition reveals that hunger affected just 5.1% of the population in 2024, a substantial improvement from the 6.1% recorded in 2020. This progress translates to 6.2 million people escaping the grip of hunger over this period.

    René Orellana Halkyer, Assistant Director-General and FAO Regional Representative for the region, emphasized that this achievement demonstrates how strategic policy interventions can generate tangible improvements in food security. The progress stems from comprehensive approaches including economic recovery measures, enhanced social protection systems, support for family farming, agricultural innovation, and the promotion of agrifood trade.

    Despite these encouraging developments, significant challenges persist. More than 33 million people across the region still experience hunger, while approximately 167 million face food insecurity. An alarming 181 million cannot afford a healthy diet, and obesity affects 141 million adults, creating a complex double burden of malnutrition.

    The region faces the world’s highest cost for a healthy diet at $5.16 per person daily (PPP), which remains a primary barrier to nutritional security. This economic challenge is compounded by climate extremes that disrupt food systems and limited access to fresh, nutritious foods.

    The upcoming 39th FAO Regional Conference for Latin America and the Caribbean (LARC39) will serve as a critical platform for addressing these persistent issues. Priority actions include strengthening sustainable production systems, expanding school feeding programs with locally sourced ingredients, implementing targeted subsidies for vulnerable populations, and modernizing food supply chains.

    FAO continues to support member states through its Strategic Framework 2022-2031, focusing on the ‘Four Betters’ approach: Better Production, Better Nutrition, a Better Environment and a Better Life. The organization emphasizes that continued collaboration and investment in resilient agrifood systems are essential to maintain momentum toward complete hunger eradication.