In its recently released 2025 annual human rights assessment, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), an independent oversight body affiliated with the Organization of American States (OAS), has outlined a mixed picture of progress and ongoing concerns for human rights protections across Jamaica. The report shines a light on both incremental policy wins and deep-rooted systemic gaps that continue to impact vulnerable communities across the Caribbean nation.
One of the most high-profile findings centers on LGBTQ+ rights: Jamaica retains its place as one of just five countries in the Americas that still enshrines criminal penalties for consensual same-sex relationships between adults. This legal framework runs counter to global advocacy priorities set by human rights organizations like the Association for the Prevention of Torture, which calls for full legal equality, protection from discrimination, and social inclusion for LGBTQ+ people in employment, healthcare, and all other spheres of public life.
Turning to disability rights, the IACHR acknowledged that Jamaica has continued rolling out its national Disabilities Act, which legally prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in education, employment, healthcare, and access to public spaces. Even with this legislative advance, the commission stressed that major barriers remain in place. Many disabled people, particularly those residing in rural communities with limited infrastructure and underfunded support systems, still lack consistent access to life-sustaining essential services. The report also flagged the absence of a specialized, appropriate facility to accommodate people with psychosocial disabilities held in state custody, joining broader concerns about poor conditions at Jamaica’s detention facilities, including the overcrowded and harsh conditions widely reported at the St Catherine Adult Correctional Centre.
On the contentious issue of capital punishment, the commission noted that Jamaica has not moved to strike the death penalty from its national statutes, despite a decades-long de facto moratorium on executions. No executions have been carried out in the country since 1988, and as of the latest official data in May 2023, no prisoners were currently facing a death sentence.
The IACHR did recognize several key positive steps taken by Jamaican authorities over the past year. Most notably, the report highlighted a dramatic 43% drop in homicides between January 1 and December 20, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. Official data recorded 649 homicides in the 2025 monitoring period, down from 1,136 the year before, bringing the national homicide rate down to 22.8 per 100,000 residents. The commission also welcomed ongoing work on constitutional reform, the launch of a public legal information portal to expand access to judicial resources, and the opening of Jamaica’s first dedicated shelter for boys who have survived human trafficking. In child welfare, the commission highlighted the opening of the St James Child and Adolescent Wellness Centre, a multi-agency facility offering critical mental health services including psychotherapy, family counseling, social work support, and psychiatric care. The new facility responds to a widespread public health crisis, with recent official data showing 20% of Jamaican children live with a diagnosable mental health disorder ranging from depression and anxiety to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Despite these gains, the IACHR raised urgent alarms around several persistent human rights risks, particularly related to citizen security and policing. The commission has continued monitoring Jamaica’s longstanding use of States of Public Emergency (SoEs) as a tool to suppress violent crime, and noted a landmark 2025 ruling from the Jamaican Supreme Court that found 17 SoEs declared between 2018 and 2023 were unconstitutional. The court ruled the measures exceeded legal authority: they were not declared for a constitutionally valid purpose, were disproportionate to the threat faced in a democratic society, and eroded separation of powers by undermining parliamentary oversight of emergency extensions. Even after this ruling, the commission confirmed that Jamaican authorities have continued to declare new SoEs, including new emergency measures for four police divisions in January 2025 following a spike in violent crime, and an additional SoE for the St Catherine North Police Division days later. The country’s parliament also approved a 180-day extension of Zones of Special Operations (ZOSOs), another targeted emergency security measure, across seven Jamaican communities in June 2025.
Most concerning, a special investigative report published in October 2025 by Jamaica’s Independent Commission of Investigations (INDECOM) documented a staggering 591% increase in police-related fatalities linked to planned police operations between 2021 and 2024. Between January and July 2025 alone, 97 people were killed by police during planned operations. INDECOM’s report mandated that all planned police operations strictly adhere to the Jamaica Constabulary Force’s existing Use of Force and Firearms Policy, with requirements for advanced planning and full documentation of all activities. Local civil society groups have since called for full implementation of INDECOM’s recommendations, alongside an independent audit to confirm that all officers are meeting mandatory human rights and accountability standards.
In the area of child rights, the IACHR also expressed concern over a controversial amendment to Jamaica’s Child Care and Protection Act passed by the House of Representatives in April 2025. The bill increases mandatory sentencing guidelines for children convicted of homicide, allowing for life sentences or minimum 30-year prison terms for children convicted of capital murder, with parole eligibility only after 15 years of incarceration. For children convicted of non-capital murder, the bill allows for life sentences or other extended prison terms, with judges granted discretion to set parole eligibility windows. The change has drawn criticism from human rights advocates who argue that harsh extended sentences for juvenile offenders contradict international standards for child justice and rehabilitation.