Carib Scope

分类： politics

  • JLP condemns Brown Burke for touching Parliament’s mace

    JLP condemns Brown Burke for touching Parliament’s mace

    KINGSTON, Jamaica — A fiery parliamentary dispute has erupted in Jamaica following an extraordinary incident during a debate on critical hurricane recovery legislation, with the ruling Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) issuing a harsh rebuke of opposition Member of Parliament Angela Brown Burke. The controversy stems from Brown Burke’s physical contact with the ceremonial mace during a Committee of the Whole House sitting convened to review clauses of the National Reconstruction and Resilience Authority (NaRRA) Bill.

    In an official press statement released Wednesday, the JLP emphasized that interfering with the mace during parliamentary proceedings constitutes a flagrant violation of the legislature’s Standing Orders, qualifying as overt disorderly conduct. Across all Commonwealth parliamentary systems, the JLP noted, the act of touching or tampering with the ceremonial mace during an official committee sitting is recognized as a severe breach of parliamentary privilege and long-standing procedural etiquette. Standard protocol for such a violation, the party added, typically warrants immediate suspension, expulsion from the parliamentary chamber, and potential further disciplinary action.

    The ceremonial mace, the JLP explained, stands as a tangible symbol of the inherent authority of the Speaker of the House and the Jamaican Parliament as a whole. Any deliberate interference with the object is therefore legally and procedurally classified as contempt of Parliament, a serious charge against any sitting legislator.

    The controversy does not end with the mace incident, according to the ruling party. After Speaker Juliet Holness named Brown Burke for her conduct and issued an order suspending her for the remainder of the sitting, the MP initially refused to comply with the directive to leave the chamber. This act of defiance, the JLP confirmed, represents a second distinct breach of parliamentary Standing Orders.

    Senator Abka Fitz-Henley, JLP Communication Chairman, framed the incident as an unacceptable attack on the integrity of parliamentary business. “MP Brown Burke’s conduct in disrupting the sitting of the House of Representatives is unacceptable and a disgrace,” Fitz-Henley said in the statement. “Her action was a clear attempt to disrupt the business of the Parliament, which was in the process of treating with a Bill, which is crucial to assist Jamaicans to recover from the devastating impact of Hurricane Melissa.”

    Fitz-Henley also extended criticism to Brown Burke’s colleagues in the opposition People’s National Party (PNP), accusing the party of enabling the disorder. When the order to expel Brown Burke was issued, PNP MPs stood between the opposition legislator and parliamentary officials to block her departure from the chamber. The ruling party spokesman called this collective action proof that the PNP cannot be trusted to conduct the nation’s public business in a responsible, appropriate manner. He also took aim at PNP leader and opposition chief Mark Golding, arguing that Golding’s failure to immediately intervene to force Brown Burke to comply with procedural rules was entirely consistent with the party’s pattern of poor conduct.

    The incident capped off a chaotic late-night session at Jamaica’s Gordon House, the seat of the country’s parliament, deepening partisan tensions ahead of further consideration of the NaRRA Bill.

  • Grand Cay BPL bills wiped ahead of vote

    Grand Cay BPL bills wiped ahead of vote

    Weeks before the Bahamas’ upcoming general election, hundreds of residents on Grand Cay in Abaco have woken up to a life-changing change: their long-accumulated electricity debt balances have been cleared entirely to zero. The sweeping debt relief comes days after Prime Minister Philip Davis made a campaign-focused visit to the hurricane-ravaged island, where he promised residents he would address their crippling billing crisis that has lingered for years.

    For long-time resident Jeremy Albury, the relief wiped out $13,500 in accumulated debt that had hung over his head since Hurricane Dorian hit the region in 2019. Fellow resident Barry Albury summed up the overwhelming joy of many in the community, saying “I felt like it was Christmas in April.” Screenshots of local community group chats shared across the island show widespread celebration, with dozens of residents joking that the holiday season had arrived months early alongside the unexpected debt cancellation.

    But the sudden, last-minute intervention has immediately drawn sharp questions from critics and residents alike, who question whether the policy is a pre-election tactic to sway voter turnout rather than a long-overdue fix for a systemic problem. Under the Bahamas’ Parliamentary Elections Act, providing gifts, cash or other benefits to voters with the goal of influencing their ballot choice is a criminal offense, a regulation that is expected to draw increased scrutiny in the wake of this announcement.

    In an official statement defending the move, the Davis administration framed the debt cancellation as a resolution to a decades-old billing crisis sparked by overlapping disasters. The government explained that normal billing and collection operations were completely upended after Hurricane Dorian tore through Abaco, and subsequent disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic compounded the problem. During that period, residents faced widespread financial hardship, limited access to in-person banking services, and strict travel and business restrictions that made paying bills nearly impossible for many. The administration also noted that under the previous government, residents were explicitly told they would not be required to pay their accumulated balances during the emergency period, but system administrators continued to add the charges to resident accounts anyway.

    After reviewing the issue, the government determined that the ballooning balances were entirely the result of circumstances outside of consumers’ control. To resolve the crisis, the state will absorb all eligible outstanding balances through an offsetting agreement with national utility provider Bahamas Power and Light, placing no financial burden on affected residents. Officials described the move as part of a broader pledge to fix unfinished problems inherited from the previous administration, rather than an election-year stunt.

    This debt relief effort comes on the heels of a separate recent report from The Tribune that revealed the Bahamian government, not the ruling Progressive Liberal Party, funded more than $200,000 in gift certificates distributed to Abaco residents via local distributor Premier Importers, according to the company’s chief executive. To date, the Davis administration has not issued any formal response to those claims, with Communications Director Latrae Rahming only confirming that the prime minister would address reporters at a future, unannounced date.

    Local residents confirm that the massive electricity bills first began accumulating after Hurricane Dorian destroyed much of Abaco’s infrastructure, when routine billing stopped entirely and unpaid charges compounded over the years. Some residents reported seeing total balances exceed $60,000, a sum far out of reach for most low-income households on the island. During a town hall meeting with Grand Cay residents last week, Davis acknowledged the crippling burden the debt placed on the community, promised to clear the balances and committed to delivering additional housing renovation supplies to the area.

    Jeremy Albury, who has helped distribute the new housing supplies to residents, confirmed the prime minister kept his promise ahead of schedule. “So said, so done,” he said, adding that “The supplies are stuff to renovate a lot of people’s homes. More stuff coming on Wednesday.” Residents estimate the total cost of clearing all outstanding electricity bills across Grand Cay and nearby Moore’s Island exceeds $500,000.

    While hundreds of eligible residents have welcomed the relief, not everyone is convinced of the policy’s good intentions. Grand Cay resident Steven Russell called the move an obvious election tactic designed to shore up support for ruling party candidates in a competitive constituency. “Everybody knows it’s a tactic because they know Cornish did not represent his constituency well,” he explained, referring to incumbent Member of Parliament Kirk Cornish. “They know that and they know which areas they are in trouble. That’s why they up in Abaco, they sharing like $200 gift certificates.”

    Another local resident, Maxwell, said the last-minute relief does little to make up for years of neglect from the national government. “That can’t really do nothing after five or six years,” he said.

    Grand Cay, a small island community that is home to just over 500 permanent residents, has struggled for years with substandard core infrastructure, including unreliable electricity, clean water access and telecommunications service. The constituency is widely seen as a competitive race in the upcoming general election, making any last-minute voter outreach particularly high-stakes for both major political parties.

  • US Supreme Court weighs ending protected status of Haitians, Syrians

    US Supreme Court weighs ending protected status of Haitians, Syrians

    On Wednesday, the deeply divided U.S. Supreme Court convened to hear legal challenges to the Trump administration’s 2019 order to revoke Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, for hundreds of thousands of Haitian and Syrian migrants currently residing in the United States. The high-stakes case has far-reaching ramifications for more than one million TPS beneficiaries from a dozen additional nations who now face the threat of mass deportation.

    Created as a humanitarian protection program, TPS shields eligible migrants from deportation and grants them work authorization, granted exclusively to people who cannot safely return to their home countries due to active armed conflict, natural disaster, or other extraordinary, life-threatening crises. Haitian nationals first gained TPS eligibility in 2010, after a magnitude 7 earthquake killed more than 200,000 people and leveled much of the country’s critical infrastructure. More than a decade later, the Caribbean nation remains mired in systemic extreme poverty, widespread gang-related violence and kidnapping, chronic political collapse, and a shattered healthcare system that prompted the U.S. State Department to issue a Level 4: Do Not Travel advisory for all American citizens. Syria obtained TPS in 2012 at the outbreak of its ongoing devastating civil war, which has left the country fragmented and unsafe for returning civilians.

    As part of his broader hardline immigration agenda, former President Donald Trump made a 2016 campaign pledge to remove millions of undocumented migrants from the U.S., and made dismantling the longstanding TPS program a central policy priority. Since taking office, his administration revoked TPS protections for migrants from 12 countries beyond Haiti and Syria, including Afghanistan, Myanmar, Somalia, Venezuela, and Yemen.

    During Wednesday’s arguments, Solicitor General John Sauer, representing the Trump administration, told the court that the Department of Homeland Security’s TPS termination decision falls under executive authority and is not eligible for judicial review. Sauer argued that barring courts from reviewing such policy choices prevents inappropriate “judicial micromanagement” of executive-led foreign policy, and added that Trump’s past controversial remarks about Haiti were being taken out of context. He claimed the president’s comments, in which he referred to Haiti and other African nations as “shithole countries” and expressed a preference for migrants from Norway over Haiti, were referencing “problems of crime, poverty and welfare dependency” rather than expressing racial bias.

    Counsel for the Haitian and Syrian TPS holders pushed back forcefully against the administration’s arguments, arguing that unsafe conditions in both home countries remain unchanged, and that the TPS cancellation was driven at least partially by explicit racial animus. Ahilan Arulanantham, an attorney for the Syrian TPS petitioners, emphasized that the case centers on “the power to mass expel people who have done nothing wrong to countries that remain unsafe.” Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor echoed this concern during questioning, directly referencing Trump’s reported comments about Haiti to question whether discriminatory intent motivated the policy.

    Early indications from the court’s ideological split suggest the six-member conservative majority leans toward siding with the Trump administration’s position, while the court’s three liberal justices appear ready to oppose the move. A final ruling from the court will set a binding precedent that shapes the future of TPS for all beneficiaries across the country.

  • Pintard calls for arrests over $200k gift certificates

    Pintard calls for arrests over $200k gift certificates

    A brewing political scandal in the Bahamas has put the ruling Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) administration under intense scrutiny, after opposition Free National Movement leader Michael Pintard launched a scathing accusation that the Davis government broke national law by diverting public funds to distribute Hurricane Dorian relief gift certificates branded with PLP election candidates’ names. Pintard has labeled the action “egregious” and is calling for formal criminal charges to be filed against those responsible.

    The controversy stems from an earlier Tribune report that confirmed the Ministry of Finance covered the cost of gift certificates distributed to residents of Abaco, designated as post-Hurricane Dorian disaster relief, which bore the signatures of sitting PLP candidates and party officials. Chris Lleida, chief executive officer of Premier Importers – the entity that issued the vouchers – confirmed the distribution was carried out at the explicit request of the Ministry of Finance. Records show the total value of the distributed vouchers exceeds $200,000, with individual certificates issued in denominations of $200, $300 and $500.

    As of press time, Office of the Prime Minister representatives have not issued an official public response to the allegations. When contacted for comment, Communications Director Latrae Rahming confirmed that Prime Minister Philip Davis will address the matter with reporters at a future, unspecified date.

    Pintard argued that the misuse of taxpayer funds for this purpose constitutes a clear criminal offence under Bahamian law. “It is a crime because you’re using government funds for a narrow political perspective,” he stated, adding that “somebody to pay the price” for the violation. He drew a direct parallel between the current controversy and the so-called “Bermuda scandal”, a previous incident where a PLP delegation trip was initially funded through the Public Treasury before the party reimbursed the cost.

    The opposition leader further claimed that the scale of the $200,000 expenditure far exceeds the spending authority granted to the financial secretary, meaning the final approval for the spending would have required sign-off from Prime Minister Davis himself. He added that the situation becomes “even more egregious” with the involvement of Bradley Fox Jr, the PLP’s candidate for Central and South Abaco, who participated in distributing the vouchers despite holding no official government position.

    Voucher copies obtained by The Tribune show the e-vouchers distributed to local residents were signed by both Fox and Preston Roberts, the PLP’s national campaign coordinator who also serves as a board member of the government’s Disaster Reconstruction Authority. “You’re talking about somebody who has no standing in government at all and so on multiple levels, this is wrong,” Pintard said. “Somebody should be held to account, and charges should be brought against them or the sanctions, whatever the sanctions are, as outlined in the law, those sanctions should be carried out.”

    Under the Bahamas’ Parliamentary Elections Act, offering or distributing money, gifts or other benefits to voters to influence their ballot choice, reward specific voting behavior, or secure a candidate’s election is classified as a criminal offence. The law also penalizes anyone who funds or knowingly facilitates these activities, including the provision of funds intended for electoral bribery.

    Critics point out that the incident highlights a longstanding gap in Bahamian election regulation: the country still lacks a comprehensive, enforceable campaign finance framework. There are no binding, clear rules requiring full public disclosure of political campaign spending, nor formal regulations governing the use of public resources during election cycles. Both of the Bahamas’ major political parties have repeatedly pledged to implement a robust campaign finance system over the years, but none have followed through on that promise to date.

  • WATCH: Farmers central to recovery and future of high-tech agriculture, says Green

    WATCH: Farmers central to recovery and future of high-tech agriculture, says Green

    KINGSTON, Jamaica — In a keynote address at the recent Recovery and Investment Forum held at Hope Gardens, hosted jointly by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Mining and the Rural Agricultural Development Authority (RADA), Minister Floyd Green has positioned Jamaican farmers as the backbone of the island nation’s post-disaster recovery and long-term food sovereignty, calling them the most foundational contributors to Jamaican society while laying out a bold vision for a modernized, technology-integrated agricultural sector.

    Green emphasized that the ongoing Hurricane Melissa Recovery Programme, a $1.98 billion initiative launched after the destructive Category 5 storm, is far more than a short-term relief effort: it is a strategic investment to construct a more climate-resilient, efficient industry that can protect Jamaica from future food supply disruptions. “This is a month dedicated to honoring our farmers,” Green told the assembled crowd of producers, agricultural input suppliers, and financial industry leaders. “Any time you sit down to a meal, you owe a farmer a word of gratitude. No matter how advanced or prosperous an economy becomes, food production will always be non-negotiable for national survival.”

    He recalled that the global COVID-19 pandemic served as a critical wake-up call for Jamaica, when widespread border closures sparked urgent fears over food access, cementing the importance of a strong, self-reliant local agricultural sector for the country. At the core of the government’s recovery strategy is RADA, which Green identified as the central engine driving support for impacted farming communities across the island. He praised the forum as a critical collaborative space that connects key stakeholders to align on both immediate recovery needs and long-term investment opportunities.

    To date, the massive recovery program has already delivered tangible results for more than 19,800 of the over 70,000 farmers impacted by Hurricane Melissa, with approximately $221 million already disbursed to restore agricultural productivity across the island. Green outlined early milestones in crop recovery: more than 14,000 packs of high-quality seeds have been distributed, enabling the rehabilitation of 840 hectares of damaged farmland. This early intervention has already driven a measurable rebound in domestic vegetable supplies, with Green noting that consumers are no longer facing widespread shortages in local markets. “People aren’t complaining about what they can’t find anymore — there’s abundant supply, whether you’re looking for cabbage or lettuce,” Green said, framing this rebound as the successful completion of the program’s first recovery phase.

    Beyond immediate relief, the forum highlighted the Jamaican government’s push to modernize the country’s agricultural sector through technology. Attendees got a first-hand look at cutting-edge tools being rolled out for domestic producers, including agricultural sprayer drones, data-collection drones for crop monitoring, and mechanized equipment such as tiller tractors and soil augers. Rollout of these technologies is supported through public-private partnerships with sector suppliers, with the core goal of boosting production efficiency and helping Jamaican agricultural goods become more competitive in global export markets.

    Financial resilience was another central focus of the event. Around 200 farmers from multiple Jamaican parishes met with representatives from leading national financial institutions, receiving one-on-one guidance on agricultural insurance products and climate risk management strategies designed to help producers better absorb the impact of future extreme weather events, which are growing more frequent amid global climate change.

    Additional progress shared at the forum included livestock recovery efforts, which have delivered 100,000 baby chicks and more than 16,000 bags of livestock feed to affected producers. The program has also supported land preparation across more than 500 additional hectares for 1,300 smallholder farmers.

    The event closed with a symbolic handover of new mechanized equipment to farmer representatives, alongside an interactive exhibition that provided producers with hands-on technical training in climate-smart agricultural practices. These efforts reinforce the Ministry of Agriculture’s overarching goal of building a high-yield, high-impact agricultural sector that delivers long-term food security and economic opportunity for all Jamaican farming communities.

  • FNM warns of chaos over missing advance voters

    FNM warns of chaos over missing advance voters

    Just days ahead of the Bahamas’ scheduled advance polling on April 30, a growing electoral dispute has erupted after opposition Free National Movement (FNM) figures revealed dozens of approved voters have been wrongly omitted from the official advance poll register, with election officials dismissing complaints with shrugs that have further enraged the party.

    Travis Robinson, an FNM candidate running in the upcoming general election, told local media that nine eligible voters who met all requirements for early voting were left off the finalized certified list, despite having applied for and received formal authorization to cast advance ballots. Among those impacted are three voters who will be out of the country on the main election day, May 12, meaning they will be completely unable to vote if the error is not corrected before advance polling opens.

    Robinson explained he submitted all advance voting applications on April 23 on behalf of three groups of eligible early voters: senior citizens, registered poll workers who would be working on main election day, and voters traveling abroad. When he returned to collect documentation two days later, he only received required L-form certificates for the senior citizens and traveling voters. To date, he says he has not received any L-form certificates for his poll worker applicants, leaving all of them locked out of the advance poll.

    The full scope of the error only became clear once the official certified advance register was published. Robinson confirmed all nine applicants met every eligibility requirement set out by election authorities, but their names were still excluded from the final list. When he escalated the issue to senior election officials, including Parliamentary Commissioner Harrison Thompson, he was told there was no way to fix the error ahead of polling.

    “I subsequently spoke with a senior official at the registry who basically told me, ‘such is life, things happen, we move on,’” Robinson recalled. “I later contacted Mr Thompson, who gave me a similar response, that unfortunately there’s nothing he can do and that it is what it is.”

    Robinson called the dismissive response completely unacceptable, warning that the disenfranchisement of these nine voters could be enough to swing the final election result in his competitive constituency. He pointed to recent Bahamian political history to underscore the stakes, noting that a former prime minister once lost his parliamentary seat by a margin of just four votes. He has issued an urgent call for Thompson to immediately amend the advance register to add the missing voters before polling begins.

    The impacted voters, Robinson added, are “highly upset” by the error, particularly the three overseas travelers who have no path to vote if the issue remains unaddressed.

    The controversy is not isolated to Robinson’s constituency, according to FNM chairman Duane Sands. Sands confirmed that multiple other FNM candidates, including himself and fellow candidate Heather Hunt, have reported identical issues with the advance poll register. He said that beyond omitting eligible voters who completed all required steps, the register also includes the names of voters who never even submitted applications for early voting.

    Worse, Sands added, the register contains glaring, basic errors that raise serious questions about the integrity of the process: some entries list voters with birth dates that have not yet occurred, meaning people who have not even been born are listed as approved advance voters.

    “When you look at the state of the register — people on the register with birthdays that have not yet come, people who according to the data haven’t even been born yet — and then there are persons who are on the advance poll register who did not apply, in some instances willing to swear an affidavit that they did not apply, and yet they are on the advance poll register, you wonder what is going on,” Sands said.

    Sands is now calling for the immediate removal of Parliamentary Commissioner Harrison Thompson, arguing that the chaotic errors undermine the legitimacy of the upcoming election. He said the severity of the mistakes leaves two possible explanations, neither of which justify Thompson keeping his post.

    “When we see the mess, the chaos, we can ask whether this is just incompetence or whether this is a deliberate act by someone who ought to be relieved of his role as Parliamentary Commissioner forthwith,” he said.

    In an official response to the growing controversy, the Parliamentary Registration Department acknowledged the errors, attributing them to limited typographical mistakes and an unexpected technical system glitch. The department downplayed the severity of the issues, arguing that the mistakes will not impact the final outcome of the election.

    “These are not consequential to the outcome of the election, as the voter’s card and counterfoil contain the accurate information that will be relied upon on voting day,” the department said in a statement. It urged political leaders to stop framing the errors as evidence of widespread systemic failure, noting that minor processing issues are a normal part of election administration. “The Department remains committed to protecting the integrity of the electoral process,” the statement added.

    The ruling Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) has pushed back against FNM’s criticism, condemning the opposition’s claims as a “reckless attack on Bahamian democracy.”

    “The Bahamas has earned its reputation as one of the strongest democracies in the region through decades of peaceful elections and independent institutions,” the PLP said in its official statement. “To suggest otherwise, for political convenience, damages that reputation abroad and weakens the confidence of Bahamians at home.”

  • Late-night turmoil in Gordon House

    Late-night turmoil in Gordon House

    Late on Tuesday, a chaotic confrontation over a critical piece of government legislation disrupted proceedings in Jamaica’s House of Representatives, resulting in the suspension of opposition Member of Parliament Angela Brown Burke, who represents St Andrew South Western. The incident unfolded during a Committee of the Whole House sitting, where lawmakers were conducting a line-by-line review of the National Reconstruction and Resilience Authority (NaRRA) Bill, a flagship policy proposal from the current administration.

    Tensions that had been simmering during debate on the divisive bill boiled over into open disorder, with the confrontation centering on the parliamentary mace — the centuries-old ceremonial object that embodies the constitutional authority of Jamaica’s legislature. After Brown Burke engaged in an incident involving the mace, Speaker of the House Juliet Holness initiated formal disciplinary proceedings by “naming” the MP, a procedural step reserved for cases of gross disorderly conduct under parliamentary rules.

    Citing Standing Order 43, Subsection 2, which requires lawmakers found guilty of grossly disorderly behavior to leave the chamber for the rest of the sitting, Holness ordered parliamentary marshals to escort Brown Burke out of the building. The opposition MP repeatedly refused to comply with the Speaker’s instructions, attempting to argue her case before being cut off, and proceedings were brought to an abrupt standstill as marshals moved to enforce the order.

    Leader of Government Business Floyd Green quickly introduced a formal motion to confirm Brown Burke’s suspension for the remainder of the day’s sitting, which passed along party lines with the government’s majority approving the measure. In remarks after order was temporarily paused, Speaker Holness emphasized that any attempt to touch or grab the mace — regardless of whether it was done in jest or protest — crosses an unacceptable line in parliamentary procedure.

    “Member, at no time can you grab the mace in Parliament. Not even in jest, member. And not in protest either,” Holness told the MP, stressing the symbolic weight of the object to the institution’s integrity. She later reminded all assembled lawmakers that parliamentary rules are not trivial, and disciplinary procedures are in place to protect the dignity of the body.

    After the confrontation, the sitting was paused for five minutes to allow tempers to cool, and Brown Burke ultimately left the chamber before lawmakers resumed their deliberations on the bill. Prime Minister Andrew Holness called for calm once proceedings restarted, noting that the disruptive scene would not be remembered as one of parliament’s finest moments, and stressing that the order and dignity of the institution must be protected at all times.

    The NaRRA Bill at the center of the tension is a key policy priority for the Jamaican government. If passed, it will establish the National Reconstruction and Resilience Authority, a centralized body tasked with coordinating post-disaster reconstruction and long-term national resilience-building efforts to respond to major emergencies ranging from hurricanes to public health crises. The legislation has already sparked sharp division among both lawmakers and the Jamaican public, with disagreements over its scope and implementation driving tense debate throughout the legislative process.

  • FNM confirms voucher distribution but denies vote buying

    FNM confirms voucher distribution but denies vote buying

    As the Bahamas prepares for its upcoming general election, a growing controversy over political voucher distribution has put both of the country’s major political parties under scrutiny, with questions mounting over whether the practice crosses into illegal vote-buying territory.

    Duane Sands, chairman of the Free National Movement (FNM), and Denalee Penn-Mackey, the party’s parliamentary candidate for the Southern Shores constituency, have publicly confirmed that their party has distributed grocery vouchers to constituents, a move that comes after prior allegations against the incumbent Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) over misuse of public funds for similar voter outreach.

    In an interview with reporters, Sands acknowledged that voucher purchases from local retail chain Super Value have risen across the political spectrum, with both the FNM and PLP accounting for the increased sales. “There’s nothing unique to any particular political organisation here,” he stated, drawing a nuanced but contested line between legal assistance and illegal electoral inducement. Under the country’s Parliamentary Elections Act, any gift or benefit offered to influence a voter’s choice is a criminal offense. Sands argued that the legality of the practice hinges entirely on intent: while providing food support to households facing food insecurity does not violate the law on its face, he admitted the practice is a “slippery slope” that carries significant potential for abuse.

    Sands stressed that even amid the controversy, he would continue assisting constituents facing crisis. “If you come to me today and say that you have no food in your house, I would do the best that I can in order to assist,” he said, noting that he does not have details on the total value or number of vouchers the FNM has acquired overall. He further drew a clear distinction between assistance funded by personal or private political donations and programs backed by public money, arguing that the latter case amounts to a clear violation of electoral law.

    The incumbent Davis administration, led by the PLP, has still not responded to explosive allegations made by Chris Lleida, chief executive officer of Premier Importers. Lleida claims that the Bahamian government, not the PLP as a party, covered the cost of more than $200,000 in gift vouchers distributed and signed by PLP election candidates and party officials. Sands called this a “clear-cut violation of the law” and argued that the entire controversy underscores the urgent need for sweeping national campaign finance reform.

    Penn-Mackey, for her part, confirmed that she began distributing vouchers in her constituency within the past week, but insisted that all costs are covered by her own personal funds, eliminating any comparison to the PLP’s public funds allegations. “That, along with my whole campaign, is run by my own personal money, so I don’t see how what the PLP has done as it relates to the money you’re spending from the public treasury ties into what I’m doing personally,” she said. The vouchers she distributes are valued at approximately $100 each.

    A long-time community philanthropist, Penn-Mackey pushed back against questions about her activities, noting she has provided community support and aid for years independent of her candidacy. “We give out food and vouchers every day. Is that vote buying? The people have a food problem where people come and they said, listen, we need some vouchers. I have no grocery in my house, so when we give them a voucher, is that vote buying?” she asked. Rejecting claims of a double standard between her actions and the allegations against the PLP, she added: “It’s not a double standard because if it’s coming from the public treasury and my vouchers are coming from my personal account, that’s not a double standard at all.”

    FNM leader Michael Pintard echoed the argument that assisting vulnerable constituents is a moral obligation regardless of election season, but warned that using public funds for aid that only intensifies or launches right before an election erodes public trust in the democratic process. “If somebody is in need, I don’t think you take an issue with the government, at least certainly me personally, if somebody is hungry they need food assistance, the government is not providing it, you ordinarily provide it, and this is what you’ve been doing, I think you have an obligation to help people who need help,” Pintard said. “That’s a general rule that certainly I’ve lived by all along in and out of political season. If somebody needs help, you help them.”

    Even so, Pintard acknowledged that introducing new or expanded assistance programs in the middle of an election cycle reasonably invites public suspicion. “It allows others, others who look on, to presume that it’s politically motivated,” he said. “There are a number of constituencies where persons know, beyond the shadow of doubt their people weren’t about doing, running any social assistance programme, have not provided a social safety net, and all of a sudden, they are offering them around election time. That’s what they’re saying about the government right now. All of a sudden, you just realise that my house was leaking, and you have not been involved in the last four and a half years. You came and did an assessment. Nothing happened until just now.”

    To date, the core rules governing electoral conduct in the Bahamas remain clear: offering, giving, or providing any money, gift, or material benefit to a voter with the goal of influencing their ballot selection is classified as a criminal offense under the Parliamentary Elections Act.

  • WATCH: Russell defends Brown Burke following parliamentary mace incident

    WATCH: Russell defends Brown Burke following parliamentary mace incident

    KINGSTON, Jamaica — A heated late-night debate over critical draft legislation has pushed parliamentary tensions to a boiling point, leaving Jamaica’s legislative body grappling with a public display of discord over how opposition lawmakers say their voices are being sidelined in key policy deliberations.

    The controversy unfolded Tuesday night inside Gordon House, Jamaica’s parliamentary building, during the clause-by-clause review of the National Reconstruction and Resilience Authority (NaRRA) Bill, a piece of legislation focused on national recovery and adaptive governance. As debate grew increasingly contentious, opposition Member of Parliament Angela Brown Burke made contact with the ceremonial mace, a centuries-old symbol of parliamentary authority. In response, Speaker Juliet Holness formally named and suspended Burke from the chamber. When Burke repeatedly refused to comply with orders to leave, parliamentary marshals were called to remove her, forcing an immediate pause to all legislative proceedings.

    In the wake of the confrontation, senior opposition lawmaker Kenneth Russell has broken his silence, framing the outburst as the inevitable outcome of a broken deliberative process that has left opposition representatives feeling shut out of negotiations on major bills.

    Russell confirmed that the opposition caucus does not condone Burke’s physical action, acknowledging her breach of parliamentary protocol was wrong. But he pushed back against framing the incident as an isolated act of insubordination, arguing the toxic, exclusionary environment inside the chamber created the conditions for the confrontation.

    “Honestly, the session has gotten to the point where we didn’t feel like we were being heard,” Russell explained. “We didn’t think it was fair. There wasn’t enough time allocated for us to hold the discussions we needed to have on behalf of the constituents we represent. She did what she did to get attention, to make sure our concerns were finally heard.”

    For opposition lawmakers, the frustration runs deeper than a single piece of legislation. Russell noted that the pattern of sidelining has left the caucus feeling cornered into taking more dramatic action to be heard. “We are working in an environment where we feel as though we have to push the limits,” he said. “We are here to represent our people. We are here to have our voices heard on issues that impact them, and when that isn’t possible, a bit of rebellion becomes necessary.”

    After the temporary halt, proceedings eventually resumed, with Prime Minister Andrew Holness calling on all lawmakers to reset, restore order, and uphold the institutional dignity of the Parliament as the review of the NaRRA Bill continued.

  • Auditor General’s Dept stretched thin

    Auditor General’s Dept stretched thin

    Jamaica’s top auditor has sounded the alarm over crippling personnel shortages that are blocking an immediate re-examination of recently recovered procurement documents from the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI), as overlapping high-stakes public sector audits stretch her department’s already thin resources to breaking point. Auditor General Pamela Monroe Ellis shared these constraints during a recent sitting of Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC), where lawmakers pressed for details on how her office would move forward after UHWI administrators announced the rediscovery of dozens of procurement files previously listed as missing.

    The controversy traces back to an earlier audit of UHWI’s procurement protocols, which flagged 51 contracts for which no supporting documentation could be produced during the initial review. That gap sparked widespread alarm over gaps in record-keeping, potential lapses in transparency, and possible non-compliance with national public procurement rules. During Tuesday’s committee sitting, UHWI Acting Chief Executive Officer Eric Hosin updated legislators: eight of the missing files, covering contracts valued at approximately $65 million, have been located in previously searched storage spaces, while another four contracts worth an estimated $35 million have had their documentation reconstructed from existing records.

    Following this update, PAC Chair Julian Robinson asked the Auditor General’s Department to outline its next steps, noting that the committee requires independent verification from the auditor general to confirm that the newly surfaced files are both complete and credible. Robinson also pushed for clarity on how the department will handle files that remain unaccounted for, and contracts that UHWI has now stated were canceled before execution.

    In her response, Monroe Ellis pushed back against the assumption that the rediscovery of files automatically resolves earlier concerns about procurement irregularities. She emphasized that any meaningful follow-up review would demand a full reassessment of every document, including rigorous checks to confirm authenticity, completeness, and alignment with procedural requirements. “I am not satisfied with just looking at a file to see that it exists. I would rather to have a more thorough audit done where I can have confidence about bona fides as well as accuracy,” she told the committee.

    Despite this commitment to rigorous oversight, Monroe Ellis made clear that an immediate review is not feasible, given that her department is already stretched thin by multiple ongoing major investigations. “I understand your desire to have some level of comfort and better particulars around this matter. But I really have to emphasise that I just do not have the manpower right now. We have other audits that we’re seeking to complete and it’s actually this audit team that is involved, and it will have a ripple effect,” she explained.

    The Auditor General added that the UHWI probe is just one component of a wider systemic audit of Jamaica’s entire public health sector, and that other major public audits have already been pushed back due to competing urgent national priorities. She specifically called out a post-Hurricane Melissa recovery spending audit that is currently consuming the bulk of her department’s audit capacity, and has already delayed a separate review of the Cornwall Regional Health Authority. “It is necessary for us to wrap those audits up to move on, which is why I’m asking for time to allow the team to complete their review of the Hurricane Melissa initiative, which is quite time-consuming, as well as the Cornwall Regional Hospital,” she said.

    Monroe Ellis’ testimony underscores the growing systemic pressure facing Jamaica’s national audit office, which is being forced to juggle a growing backlog of high-profile public interest investigations against a static ceiling on staffing and operational resources.