分类： politics

In a significant policy reversal, the Briceño administration has formally terminated its pursuit of the Thirteenth Amendment to Belize’s Constitution as a mechanism to address the nation’s crime epidemic. The decision follows extensive nationwide consultations that revealed insufficient public and parliamentary support for the constitutional overhaul.

Attorney General Anthony Sylvestre confirmed the administration’s shift in strategy, indicating that while the comprehensive amendment package has been shelved, certain components—notably the establishment of a specialized Gun Court—remain under consideration through alternative legislative pathways.

“The ministry of Home Affairs and AG’s ministry are consulting and considering this matter,” Sylvestre stated. “A final product has not been determined as yet regarding what will be the next step—whether that will be an amendment to the criminal code or the Crime Control and Criminal Justice Act.”

The Attorney General emphasized that any legislative measures derived from the original amendment proposal would require thorough parliamentary deliberation and additional public consultation. He specifically noted that the potential implementation of a Gun Court, once contemplated as part of the constitutional amendment, could potentially be enacted through regular statutory legislation rather than constitutional reform.

Sylvestre declined to provide further specifics pending final decisions, but unequivocally stated: “The Thirteenth Amendment or parts of the Thirteenth Amendment will no longer be pursued.” The ultimate determination regarding which elements might be preserved through alternative legislation rests with parliamentary committees and elected representatives.

This development represents a notable recalibration of the government’s approach to criminal justice reform, shifting from comprehensive constitutional change to targeted legislative measures that can be implemented through established parliamentary processes.

In a significant legal development, social advocate Jerry Enriquez has secured High Court authorization to challenge the Judicial and Legal Services Commission’s rejection of his formal complaint. The judicial body had previously dismissed Enriquez’s submission in late 2025, a decision the activist contends disregarded substantial and compelling evidence.

The High Court’s approval enables Enriquez to pursue formal judicial review proceedings against the JLSC, marking a notable escalation in the confrontation between civil society and Jamaica’s judicial oversight mechanism. Attorney General Anthony Sylvestre acknowledged the historical precedent of such challenges, revealing this isn’t the commission’s first courtroom encounter.

Sylvestre referenced a prior case that progressed to the Caribbean Court of Justice involving allegations against Justice of Appeal Awich. The Jamaican Bar Association had previously sought removal proceedings against Awich for alleged misconduct concerning delayed judgment delivery, though the JLSC initially declined to advance those proceedings. That case established important procedural precedents regarding the commission’s accountability mechanisms.

The current litigation raises fundamental questions about complaint adjudication transparency within Jamaica’s judicial oversight framework. Legal observers anticipate this case could potentially reshape how the JLSC evaluates future misconduct allegations and complaint dismissals.

A significant political rift has emerged within Belize’s United Democratic Party (UDP) following controversial remarks about Venezuela, exposing internal divisions on foreign policy. Former UDP leader Moses “Shyne” Barrow has publicly denounced current party leadership for expressing sympathy toward Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro without consulting membership.

Barrow specifically criticized Senator Patrick Faber and other UDP representatives for what he characterized as “crying tears for the dictator, narco-trafficker Mr. Nicolás Maduro” during a recent press conference. The former leader emphasized the UDP’s identity as a “conservative, center-right party” with established international affiliations to Republican and conservative parties, suggesting the pro-Maduro position contradicts these alliances.

The controversy stems from a UDP press conference held last Tuesday where Faber criticized the Briceño administration’s January 5 statement on Venezuela. Faber had argued the government’s position lacked clarity and appeared designed to avoid offending Washington, claiming the ruling People’s United Party was “hiding behind CARICOM” rather than asserting an independent foreign policy.

Barrow countered this perspective by endorsing the government’s approach, describing the official statement as “mild and temperate and consistent with what CARICOM put out on the matter.” He further cautioned against antagonizing the United States, Belize’s largest trading partner, while invoking former Prime Minister George Price’s foreign policy mantra of being “friend to all, enemy to none” – while explicitly excluding “despotic dictators” from this philosophy.

Barrow highlighted Maduro’s record of jailing political opponents, creating millions of displaced Venezuelans, and threatening CARICOM’s zone of peace as reasons to distance Belize from the Venezuelan leader. Senator Faber declined to comment when contacted by news outlets regarding the growing internal dispute.

In a significant political development, former United Democratic Party (UDP) leader Moses “Shyne” Barrow has voiced conditional support for Belize Telemedia Limited’s proposed acquisition of Speednet, arguing that state-controlled monopolies can deliver public benefit. The controversial stance emerged during a January 19th press engagement where Barrow challenged prevailing skepticism toward market consolidation.

Barrow presented a comparative analysis of Belize’s infrastructure landscape, noting: “Our nation already operates sanctioned monopolies in critical sectors including Belize Electricity Limited and Belize Water Services. The ideological resistance to telecommunications consolidation appears inconsistent when examining existing market structures.” The former opposition leader specifically addressed shareholder concerns, emphasizing that since BTL operates as a public-private partnership with majority Belizean ownership, any resulting monopoly would ultimately benefit citizens through consolidated returns.

Despite his theoretical support, Barrow delivered scathing criticism of BTL’s leadership for their disastrous public rollout of the proposal. He characterized the board’s communications strategy as profoundly mishandled, creating unnecessary public distrust. Barrow particularly contested the board chairman’s characterization of BTL as a private entity, asserting: “This represents a fundamental misrepresentation of corporate structure. As a PPP model with majority public ownership, the enterprise ultimately serves the Belizean people.”

The former UDP leader simultaneously addressed internal party tensions, criticizing current UDP Leader Tracy Panton for her undisclosed meeting with Lord Ashcroft aboard his yacht. Barrow questioned the timing and opacity of the engagement, suggesting it undermined Panton’s credibility to demand transparency in the BTL-Speednet negotiations.

Prime Minister John Briceño has maintained that BTL’s board should pursue corporate interests independently, while opposition figures demand greater transparency before approving any merger. The developing situation reveals deep philosophical divisions regarding market regulation and public ownership in Belize’s political landscape.

Belizean politician Moses “Shyne” Barrow has publicly contested his exclusion from the United Democratic Party’s roster of former leaders “in good standing,” labeling the move as both divisive and constitutionally improper. The controversy emerged during a recent UDP press conference where Barrow’s name was conspicuously absent from the honored list.

Expressing profound disappointment to News Five, Barrow emphasized his extensive service record as opposition leader, UDP party leader, and longstanding Mesopotamia constituency representative. “I’ve served my country with all that I’ve had,” Barrow stated, reaffirming his ongoing commitment to his constituents despite the party’s apparent snub.

The political veteran highlighted constitutional requirements, noting that formal due process must precede any declaration of bad standing status. “If they want to say I am in bad standing, thus I don’t qualify, they would have to have a meeting, which they have not done,” Barrow asserted, questioning the procedural validity of his exclusion.

Barrow further accused current UDP leadership of double standards, recalling previous instances where he disciplined members for public criticism only to be told such actions violated freedom of speech principles. “I would like to see what their position is now,” he challenged.

The tension appears rooted in Barrow’s historical disagreements with Opposition Leader Tracy Panton, including his 2025 legal challenge against the Elections and Boundaries Commission regarding use of UDP’s signature red color by Panton’s Alliance for Democracy candidates. The Supreme Court ultimately dismissed the case as moot.

Recent tensions reignited when Barrow included his name on promotional materials as “Shyne Barrow, Mesopotamia, UDP,” prompting Panton to publicly affirm Lee Mark Chang as the area’s sole duly elected representative. Barrow countered that while Chang holds the elected position, he never officially secured standard-bearer or caretaker status through proper party procedures.

Barrow lamented the public nature of the dispute, emphasizing that internal resolution mechanisms should have been pursued. UDP Leader Tracy Panton responded to inquiries by noting the National Party Council had not yet convened to determine standing status, with the first meeting scheduled for January 31, 2026.