分类: politics

  • ‘No apologies’

    ‘No apologies’

    Jamaica’s Energy and Telecommunications Minister Daryl Vaz has issued a robust defense of his decision to authorize emergency procurement of Starlink satellite devices during Hurricane Melissa’s devastation in October 2025, directly challenging the Auditor General’s findings of procurement violations. The $12-million acquisition of 200 units has sparked a heated political confrontation regarding emergency protocols versus procedural compliance.

    Minister Vaz asserted that the catastrophic communications breakdown following the hurricane justified immediate action beyond standard bureaucratic channels. ‘I make no apologies for ensuring the Government could secure available devices rapidly for distribution to state agencies and recovery teams,’ Vaz declared, referencing official emergency procurement guidelines that permit extraordinary measures during genuine crises.

    The Auditor General’s compliance audit, however, determined that procurement procedures were circumvented. The report revealed that ministerial instruction rather than the Office of Disaster Preparedness and Emergency Management (ODPEM) director general initiated the process, with devices delivered before formal approval documentation was completed. Additionally, the audit found numerous units remained unused months after purchase, with inventory management deficiencies and compatibility issues involving European-style plugs.

    Opposition spokesman Phillip Paulwell has demanded transparency, highlighting contradictions in government statements regarding donated versus purchased units. ‘Jamaicans are entitled to clear and consistent answers,’ Paulwell stated, emphasizing that telecommunications decisions during emergencies ‘must be unimpeachable and fully compliant with the law.’

    Vaz countered by accusing the opposition of political opportunism, noting that opposition members themselves had requested and received Starlink devices during the crisis. ‘The accountability that Paulwell and the Opposition demand may therefore begin with the devices that they received,’ Vaz remarked, characterizing the criticism as disingenuous.

    The minister maintained that the moral imperative of saving lives outweighed procedural concerns during the national emergency. ‘If even one life was saved, or even one family rescued as a result of the decision taken then it would have been worth it,’ Vaz concluded, defending his actions as necessary during Jamaica’s ‘most vulnerable and fragile’ period.

  • Cuba willing to talk to US ‘without pressure’ as fuel shortage continues

    Cuba willing to talk to US ‘without pressure’ as fuel shortage continues

    HAVANA, Cuba — In a firm national address broadcast on state media Thursday, Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel declared his nation’s readiness to engage in diplomatic talks with the United States, but strictly on condition of mutual respect and without external pressure. This statement comes as a direct response to recent threats from US President Donald Trump, who has aggressively threatened to sever Cuba’s oil access and predicted the collapse of its communist government.

    President Diaz-Canel emphasized that any potential dialogue must be conducted between equals, respecting Cuba’s sovereignty, independence, and right to self-determination without interference in its internal affairs. This position directly counters Trump’s public urgings for Havana to ‘make a deal before it is too late’—a proposition the Cuban government maintains does not constitute genuine negotiation.

    The escalating tension occurs against a backdrop of severe economic and energy distress in Cuba. The nation, already grappling with its worst economic crisis in decades, faces acute fuel shortages that have crippled power generation. An electrical grid failure earlier Thursday left hundreds of thousands in eastern Cuba without electricity for hours, highlighting the vulnerability of its infrastructure.

    This crisis has been exacerbated by the US’s recent actions in Venezuela, Cuba’s primary historical oil supplier. Following a US military operation that ousted Venezuelan leadership, Trump claimed control over the nation’s oil reserves and vowed to starve Cuba of fuel, threatening tariffs on any third country attempting to supply the sanctioned island.

    While the White House, through spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt, asserted that diplomacy is ongoing and that the Cuban government is ‘on its last leg,’ Havana continues to deny the existence of formal negotiations. International support appears limited; Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum stated her country is pursuing diplomatic channels to resume oil shipments to Cuba but will not risk triggering punitive US tariffs.

    President Diaz-Canel acknowledged the gravity of the fuel situation, noting that energy production from traditional generators has been ‘zero for weeks,’ but insisted that ‘Cuba is not alone.’ He pointed to the current pressure as validation of Cuba’s efforts to transition toward renewable energy and reduce foreign dependence. While Cuban officials squarely blame decades of US sanctions for the crisis, independent observers also cite poor economic management and a pandemic-induced tourism collapse as contributing factors to the nation’s dire situation.

  • Gov’t promises faster cyber reforms after Opposition criticism

    Gov’t promises faster cyber reforms after Opposition criticism

    Jamaica’s government has acknowledged significant delays in updating national cybersecurity legislation, with Minister Dr. Andrew Wheatley admitting the Opposition’s concerns about the country falling behind evolving digital threats were justified. The concession came as the House of Representatives approved amendments to the Cybercrimes Act on Tuesday, following criticism that the nearly three-year revision process had left the nation vulnerable to advanced cybercriminal activities.

    During parliamentary debates, Opposition members highlighted how rapidly advancing technologies—including artificial intelligence tools, sophisticated online fraud schemes, and digital impersonation tactics—had already outpaced the legislative provisions under review. They argued that criminal elements had adapted to new technologies while Parliament deliberated on outdated recommendations from the 2023 Joint Select Committee.

    Minister Wheatley, responding while closing the debate, recognized the validity of these concerns and pledged a fundamental shift in legislative approach. “The Government accepts the broader point. Technology moves quickly and the law must not be allowed to move slowly,” he stated, committing to more frequent and responsive review cycles rather than extended periods between updates.

    However, Wheatley also elaborated on the complexities involved in cyber legislation reform, explaining that effective measures require careful balancing of multiple factors beyond simply adding new offenses to statute books. “It requires careful alignment of enforcement powers, prosecutorial practicality, constitutional safeguards, and coherence with other laws, especially where amendments touch issues like consent, privacy, public interest and sensitive data,” he noted.

    The government’s new approach signals recognition that traditional legislative timelines are incompatible with the rapid evolution of digital threats, including AI-generated content, online extortion schemes, and anonymous smear campaigns that exploit legal loopholes.

  • STATEMENT (UPP): Government’s Failure to Provide Continuous Registration Violates Electoral Law and Democratic Rights

    STATEMENT (UPP): Government’s Failure to Provide Continuous Registration Violates Electoral Law and Democratic Rights

    The United Progressive Party (UPP), under the leadership of Joshua Francis, has issued a formal demand for the immediate reinstatement of new voter registration in Dominica, citing clear violations of electoral legislation. This development follows the Electoral Commission’s suspension of registration services, which officials attributed to ongoing software and hardware development alongside training initiatives for registration officers.

    A documented incident from January 12, 2026, reveals that a prospective voter was refused registration after officials claimed the necessary technological infrastructure remained unprepared for processing first-time registrations. The UPP characterizes this administrative failure as a severe breach of electoral law rather than a mere technical inconvenience.

    Legal experts point to Section 17(1) of the Registration of Electors Act, 2025, which explicitly mandates continuous registration of qualified electors. The party contends that neither technological delays nor administrative unpreparedness provides legal justification for suspending this statutory requirement, placing both the Electoral Commission and the Dominican government in direct violation of their legal obligations.

    The situation presents multiple potential legal ramifications:

    • Constitutional challenges regarding infringement of democratic participation rights
    • Breach of statutory duty by election officials failing to maintain continuous registration
    • Grounds for electoral petitions challenging future election validity
    • Potential disenfranchisement claims against the state
    • Possible judicial review proceedings to compel legal compliance

    UPP Leader Francis emphasized the irony that while electoral reform dominates national discourse, the most fundamental democratic process—voter registration—remains inaccessible. “No citizen should be told they must wait to exercise their fundamental democratic right because government institutions failed to prepare adequate systems,” Francis stated.

    The party’s formal demands include immediate registration resumption, a public explanation from the Electoral Commission regarding the legal basis for suspensions, government accountability for administrative failures, guarantees against future registration obstacles, and an independent review of electoral reform implementation.

    The UPP has called upon affected citizens, civil society organizations, legal professionals, and international observers to document experiences and advocate for electoral integrity. The party asserts that genuine electoral reform must not only be fair but must demonstrably comply with legal standards—conditions they believe are currently unmet.

    The government faces mounting pressure to restore continuous voter registration in accordance with statutory requirements, with further delays potentially constituting both democratic principles betrayal and continued violation of citizens’ legal rights.

  • Cuban FM highlights role of Chinese agency focused on cooperation

    Cuban FM highlights role of Chinese agency focused on cooperation

    In a significant diplomatic engagement, Cuban official Rodriguez held high-level talks with Chinese Communist Party representatives to reinforce bilateral relations. The meeting, which occurred against a backdrop of global geopolitical tensions, served to solidify the strategic partnership between Havana and Beijing.

    During discussions with Liu Haixing, Director of the International Liaison Department of the Communist Party of China, both parties affirmed that inter-party relations form the essential foundation of their bilateral partnership. Rodriguez explicitly recognized China’s contributions to strengthening cooperation between the nations, particularly given current geopolitical challenges affecting the island nation.

    The Chinese official reciprocated with warm sentiments, extending heartfelt wishes to the Cuban people and government while highlighting the vigorous nature of Sino-Cuban relations. Rodriguez responded with Lunar New Year greetings for the Chinese people, expressing hopes for peace, prosperity, and health.

    Both representatives contextualized their meeting within what they characterized as a rapidly deteriorating international order, noting increasing threats to national sovereignty and global peace. Despite these challenges, the two nations reported substantial progress in constructing a shared future community featuring enhanced coordination mechanisms, deepened political trust, mutual support on core interests, and expanded multi-sector cooperation—all advancing under directives from their respective national leadership.

  • Stop the hatred against Cuba, women’s organization in Peru demands

    Stop the hatred against Cuba, women’s organization in Peru demands

    A Cuban advocacy organization has issued a forceful condemnation of United States foreign policy, characterizing recent measures as part of a dangerous escalation in aggression. The group, operating under the collective name ‘We Are All Micaelas,’ asserts that these actions form a calculated campaign to instigate governmental change in Cuba through coercive means.

    The statement specifically references the seizure of oil tankers destined for Cuban shores and the implementation of restrictive visa policies featuring exorbitant fees and partial suspensions. These moves are framed within a broader historical context of US military dominance, which the organization labels as ‘rabid and decadent.’ The critique highlights a profound contradiction: a nation possessing the world’s most formidable military arsenal, and one with a unique history of nuclear weapon deployment, now designates a peaceful Caribbean island as an ‘unusual and extraordinary threat’ to its national security.

    This designation, the group argues, serves as a pretext for imposing extraterritorial sanctions and represents an extreme form of hypocrisy. The communication vehemently disputes the notion that Cuba poses any legitimate threat, instead portraying the island’s people as dignified and committed to peace. The narrative positions Washington’s policies as not only an affront to Cuba but also a humiliation to all global citizens, a blatant disregard for international law, and a direct obstacle to establishing a civilized world order founded on mutual respect.

    In closing, ‘We Are All Micaelas’ issues a clarion call to the global community, urging conscious individuals everywhere to denounce coercion, break away from complicit silence, and recognize that no geopolitical objective can morally justify the deliberate infliction of harm upon civilian populations.

  • Na COP30 krijgt Suriname–Brazilië-overleg concreet vervolg

    Na COP30 krijgt Suriname–Brazilië-overleg concreet vervolg

    In a significant diplomatic development, Suriname and Brazil have embarked on a new chapter of strengthened bilateral relations through high-level ministerial discussions in Brasília. Foreign Minister Melvin Bouva of Suriname, overseeing International Trade and Cooperation, engaged in substantive working consultations with his Brazilian counterpart, Mauro Vieira, and accompanying delegations.

    The high-stakes meeting convened at the prestigious Palácio do Itamaraty, the headquarters of Brazil’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, marking a concrete implementation of agreements established during presidential discussions between President Jennifer Geerlings-Simons of Suriname and President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil. These previous negotiations occurred alongside the COP30 climate summit in Belém during November 2025.

    Central to the ministerial dialogue was the meticulous preparation for an anticipated presidential summit scheduled for the first half of this year. Both diplomatic teams examined specific cooperative projects and programs destined for approval by the respective heads of state. The comprehensive agenda spanned multiple strategic sectors including agricultural development, healthcare innovation, defense coordination, public administration, cybersecurity enhancement, and educational exchange programs.

    As neighboring nations and strategic partners within the South-South cooperation framework, both countries demonstrated renewed commitment to deepening their bilateral relationship. The diplomatic engagement will continue with a Brazilian Foreign Ministry delegation scheduled to undertake a working visit to Suriname in late February.

    Following the productive discussions in Brazil, Minister Bouva and his delegation immediately departed for Dubai to participate in the 10th International Cooperation Conference of the Association of Caribbean States, where the minister will remain engaged through February 7th.

  • LETTER: Joan Says Hon. Kelvin Simon Should Not Worry About Her but About Winning His Seat

    LETTER: Joan Says Hon. Kelvin Simon Should Not Worry About Her but About Winning His Seat

    A dramatic internal conflict within the United Progressive Party (UPP) reached new heights as Joan, the prominent host of Progressive Radio, delivered a blistering on-air condemnation of Member of Parliament Hon. Kelvin Simon. The broadcast has exposed deepening fractures within the party’s ranks as it struggles with internal dissent.

    During her widely listened program, Joan directly challenged Simon’s parliamentary position, stating he should focus less on her criticisms and more on securing his electoral standing in St. Mary South. The radio personality detailed multiple grievances against the MP, who has been a central figure in the party’s internal strife since its last convention.

    Joan accused Simon of attempting to silence her voice by allegedly complaining to party leadership about her commentary. “I am a voter!” she emphatically declared, asserting her right to express opinions without restriction. She further questioned whether Simon had ever defended her during his appearances on the ‘Knight on Night’ show.

    The criticism extended to Simon’s alliance with Mr. Knight on Observer media, where they have publicly criticized UPP leadership. Joan posed a fundamental question about party cohesion: “How can we move forward when our own members are tearing each other down?”

    Adding to her allegations, Joan highlighted Simon’s apparent absence from crucial party events and failure to maintain connection with his constituency branch members. She revealed growing discontent among Simon’s supporters, with some reportedly considering voting for his opponent in upcoming elections.

    Joan concluded with a powerful call to action, urging Simon to improve engagement with his branch, foster party unity, and end what she characterized as his pattern of avoidance. The broadcast has transformed into an unexpected platform for party supporters to express their concerns about internal divisions and leadership effectiveness.

    The segment concluded with an impassioned plea for collective effort to restore party strength, underscoring the critical need for unity within the troubled political organization.

  • Trump en Petro: onverwachte verstandhouding in Witte Huis

    Trump en Petro: onverwachte verstandhouding in Witte Huis

    In a remarkable diplomatic turnaround, U.S. President Donald Trump and Colombian President Gustavo Petro convened for an unexpectedly cordial two-hour private meeting at the Oval Office on Tuesday, marking their first face-to-face engagement amid previously strained relations.

    The closed-door discussion, conducted without media presence, yielded positive assessments from both leaders despite months of public acrimony. President Trump confirmed collaborative efforts to combat drug trafficking from Colombia, stating, ‘We were working together and it clicked. We were never friends because I didn’t know him, but I didn’t feel insulted.’

    President Petro subsequently shared on social media platform X a photograph featuring Trump’s handwritten note: ‘Gustavo – a great honor – I love Colombia.’ In interviews with Colombian radio network Caracol, Petro emphasized that their ideological differences proved less significant than media portrayals had suggested.

    The Colombian leader presented specific requests during the meeting, seeking U.S. assistance in locating major drug criminals operating beyond Colombia’s borders. Additionally, Petro asked Trump to mediate an ongoing diplomatic dispute between Colombia and Ecuador, whose president maintains strong allegiance to the U.S. administration. According to Petro, Trump agreed to initiate contact with Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa.

    This diplomatic engagement represents a substantial shift from previous exchanges. In October, Trump had baselessly labeled Petro an ‘illegal drug trafficker’ and earlier this year suggested potential military action against Colombia. Petro had conversely criticized U.S. military interventions throughout Latin America.

    The Washington meeting follows an unexpectedly positive telephone conversation in January, signaling gradual reconciliation. Petro even complimented the recent refurbishment of the Oval Office, particularly noting its gold accent features.

    Outstanding issues remain unresolved, including U.S. sanctions against Petro himself due to unproven allegations of drug trade connections—claims the Colombian president vehemently denies.

    Regional security analysts note that failed reconciliation could have severe consequences for regional stability. As the world’s largest producer of coca—the primary ingredient for cocaine—Colombia hosts multiple U.S.-designated terrorist organizations while simultaneously serving as a crucial U.S. ally in anti-narcotics operations.

    Under Petro’s administration, coca production has increased according to some metrics, though interpretations vary. Colombia has shifted from forced eradication policies toward more sophisticated interception mechanisms and seizure operations.

    The meeting occurred against a complex backdrop: Last week, Petro urged Colombian migrants in Chile, Argentina, and the United States to return home to avoid ‘slave-like’ treatment abroad. He also declared he would prefer residing in Havana over Miami, which he characterized as traffic-congested and culturally deficient.

  • GPA tells House Speaker he’s referring to COVID-19 agreement on media access

    GPA tells House Speaker he’s referring to COVID-19 agreement on media access

    In a significant development for press freedom in Guyana, the Guyana Press Association (GPA) has publicly refuted claims by House Speaker Manzoor Nadir regarding an existing agreement on media access to parliamentary proceedings. The controversy emerged during the February 3-4, 2026 parliamentary sessions when Speaker Nadir asserted that current media arrangements were established in consultation with the GPA.

    The GPA issued a comprehensive statement clarifying that any previous agreement with the Parliament Office was specifically limited to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions in 2020 and has been obsolete since national restrictions ended in March 2022. The association emphasized that Speaker Nadir’s continued reference to this expired agreement represents a fundamental misrepresentation of the current media landscape.

    The dispute centers on the Speaker’s decision to limit parliamentary access to only seven journalists while banning all private television news cameras from the chamber, permitting only the state-affiliated Department of Public Information (DPI) to provide video coverage. The GPA maintains that these restrictions are unjustified, noting that the parliamentary chamber has historically accommodated up to twelve journalists and multiple camera operators simultaneously.

    Speaker Nadir challenged opposition parliamentarian Sherod Duncan to formally propose changes to parliamentary rules through a motion while simultaneously expunging Duncan’s concerns from the official record. The Speaker maintained that no journalists are restricted from covering proceedings, despite implementing the seven-reporter cap.

    The GPA has identified multiple concerns with the current arrangement, including the unreliable nature of the DPI-provided video feed, which frequently experiences audio breaks and interruptions. The association also rejected the Speaker’s suggestion that smartphone recordings could substitute for professional broadcast equipment.

    This conflict represents the latest chapter in an ongoing struggle between Guyana’s media community and parliamentary authorities. The GPA characterizes these restrictions as an attack on media freedom that compromises transparent coverage of the nation’s legislative processes, particularly during critical events like budget presentations.