In a dramatic turn of events, Azruddin Mohamed, the leader of the We Invest in Nationhood (WIN) political party, was arrested on Friday, October 31, 2025, just days before his anticipated election as Guyana’s next opposition leader. The arrest was made in response to an extradition request by the United States, where Mohamed and his father, Nazar “Shell” Mohamed, face 11 charges related to fraud and money laundering. Home Affairs Minister Oneidge Walrond confirmed the arrests to Demerara Waves Online News, though the Guyana Police Force has remained tight-lipped about the details. Leader of the People’s National Congress Reform, Aubrey Norton, emphasized the importance of adhering to legal procedures in this high-profile case. The arrest has sent shockwaves through Guyana’s political landscape, raising questions about the future of the WIN party and the opposition’s leadership.
分类： politics
-
Xi roept op tot samenwerking en vrije handel op APEC-top
Chinese President Xi Jinping emphasized the importance of strengthened cooperation and the preservation of free trade during his address at the 32nd Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Economic Leaders’ Meeting in Gyeongju, South Korea. The two-day summit, which commenced on Friday, saw Xi present five key proposals aimed at fostering economic integration and sustainable development across the Asia-Pacific region.
-
2025 general election vital to the survival of ULP, NDP
The upcoming general election in St. Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG) on November 27, 2025, is shaping up to be a decisive moment for the nation’s political landscape. With the Unity Labour Party (ULP) aiming for an unprecedented sixth consecutive term, the stakes are high for both the ULP and the opposition New Democratic Party (NDP). A senior NDP member has warned that a loss could spell the end of their party, underscoring the critical nature of this election.
-
Inside the head of a police officer on Independence Parade
As a proud member of the Royal St. Vincent and the Grenadines Police Force, I stood in my immaculate uniform, shoes gleaming under the lights, and a fresh haircut framing my confident yet anxious smile. It was the nation’s 46th anniversary, a celebration of freedom from oppression and the chains that once bound our ancestors. Yet, as I stood there, a burning question consumed me: How independent are we, truly? How free are we as a police force, compelled to stage annual spectacles for the public we serve? How free are we as a nation, waiting not for inspiration but for handouts from the Prime Minister’s “goodie bag”? And how free are we as a government that prioritizes financial aid over sustainable development, or shifts blame onto those tasked with crime prevention rather than addressing the root causes? My frustration grew as I listened to speeches masking political agendas with national pride. I was devastated, tempted to turn away from the parade entirely. My disappointment stemmed not from being overlooked by the Minister of National Security or from seeing less deserving colleagues in prominent roles. It came from the Prime Minister’s failure to address crime mismanagement, his refusal to apologize for past mistakes, and his inability to inspire unity in a politically divided nation. As a citizen and a police officer, I urge my fellow officers to cast their votes in the upcoming general election with a clear question in mind: “Am I free?” Let us vote not for personal gain but for the future of our children, our neighbors, and our nation. We are not disposable, no matter how much they make us believe otherwise.
-
Your vote matters
The 2020 elections in St. Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG) witnessed a significant voter abstention rate, with 32,432 registered voters—33.1% of the total electorate—choosing not to participate. This alarming trend raises critical questions about the underlying causes of voter disengagement. Potential factors include an outdated voter register, socioeconomic disparities, political disillusionment, a divisive political climate, and a lack of youth participation, particularly among those from disadvantaged backgrounds. These issues, either individually or collectively, have contributed to the growing apathy toward the electoral process. For future elections, the electoral office must prioritize updating the voter register and addressing systemic barriers to participation. Additionally, fostering a more inclusive and engaging political environment is essential to encourage all Vincentians, especially the youth, to exercise their democratic rights. The article emphasizes the historical significance of voting, citing the struggles of figures like George Hamilton Charles, who championed universal suffrage in SVG. It calls on Vincentians to honor the sacrifices of past generations by actively participating in the democratic process. Voting is not just a constitutional right but a moral and civic responsibility that shapes the nation’s future. The piece concludes with a powerful reminder that every vote counts, as demonstrated by the narrow victory in North Leeward during the last election. Vincentians are urged to educate themselves on political issues, register to vote, and make their voices heard in the upcoming elections.
-
Grace urges North Windward to look to the future
Grace Walters, the Unity Labour Party (ULP) candidate for North Windward, has passionately urged constituents to embrace the future her party promises if re-elected for a sixth consecutive term. Speaking at the ULP’s “Labour Strong” rally in Kingstown, Walters emphasized the importance of staying focused on progress and avoiding negativity. Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves also announced November 27 as the date for the upcoming general election during the event. Walters, a first-time candidate, painted a vivid picture of a prosperous future, highlighting advancements in airports, ports, and healthcare services. She called on supporters to trust a leadership that delivers, cares, and protects, urging them not to gamble with their families’ futures. Walters criticized the New Democratic Party (NDP), stating that North Windward would reject them as they had in the past. She warned against experimenting with new leadership during global turmoil, emphasizing the need for experienced governance. Walters praised Gonsalves as a divinely guided leader who prioritizes national safety and development, citing the construction of a modern hospital as an example. She acknowledged delays in repairing houses damaged by natural hazards but pledged to continue the work post-election. Walters highlighted the ULP’s achievements, including the Rabacca Bridge, safer roads, and the revival of the arrowroot industry. She promised to deliver youth mentorship programs, job creation through tourism, improved housing, and an indigenous heritage center to preserve culture. Walters also vowed to expand healthcare and education access in the constituency. She faces competition from the NDP’s Shevern John, a former educator and senator, who narrowly lost the seat in 2020.
-
Guyana’s presumptive Opposition Leader and father arrested pending U.S. Extradition
In a significant development, Guyana’s presumptive Opposition Leader, Azruddin Mohamed, and his father, Nazar Mohamed, were arrested on October 31, 2025, following an extradition request from the United States. The arrests occurred in Georgetown, with Azruddin detained outside the Guyana Revenue Authority (GRA) and his father taken into custody shortly after. The duo faces 11 criminal charges in the U.S., including money laundering, wire fraud, and mail fraud, stemming from indictments unsealed in a Florida court earlier this month. U.S. authorities have reportedly been investigating the Mohameds since the early 2010s. Additionally, they are accused of tax evasion and the alleged misuse of official GRA seals to evade duties and taxes. Azruddin Mohamed, who recently entered politics and led the We Invest Nationhood party, secured the majority of opposition seats in the September General Elections. He is set to be sworn in as Leader of the Opposition next week. The extradition proceedings began today, with both men appearing in court. The Office of the Attorney General confirmed that the formal extradition request was received from the U.S. on Thursday.
-
FOIA Law Places Burden of Proof on Government
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) mandates that government ministries must provide a valid justification for denying access to public records, as emphasized by Section 38 of the Act. Under FOIA, individuals have the right to request government-held information unless the document falls under exemptions outlined in Part IV. In cases of refusal, the ministry is required to issue a written notice under Section 21, detailing the reasons for the decision and informing the applicant of their right to appeal to the Ombudsman.
Section 38 of the FOIA, which governs the Review of Decisions process, explicitly states that the ministry or prescribed authority bears the burden of proof. They must demonstrate that their decision to withhold information was justified under exemptions such as national security, Cabinet confidentiality, or legal privilege, or that the Ombudsman should rule against the applicant. This ensures that access to information remains the default, with the ministry required to validate its refusal rather than the applicant proving the legitimacy of their request.
Failure to meet this burden can result in the Ombudsman ordering disclosure under Section 39. Recently, the Government of Belize has escalated this process by appealing to the High Court to overturn the Ombudsman’s directive to release information regarding payments to private law firms. While FOIA permits appeals to the Supreme Court under Section 43, such appeals usually follow a completed review. The Attorney General’s decision to directly challenge the Ombudsman’s directive now brings the interpretation of these procedural safeguards before the judiciary, marking a significant development in the application of FOIA.
-
Attorney General Appeals Ombudsman’s FOIA Decision
The Attorney General of Belize has initiated a legal challenge against an Ombudsman’s decision mandating the disclosure of government payments to private law firms under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). On October 28, 2025, a Notice of Appeal was filed in the High Court, naming the Attorney General as the appellant and the Ombudsman as the respondent. The appeal seeks to overturn the Ombudsman’s October 10th ruling, arguing it contains legal errors. The filing references Part V of the FOIA, the Inferior Appeals Rules 2021, and Sections 31 and Sub-Part 8 of the Senior Courts Act. It also bears a General Registry stamp dated October 28, 2025. Part V of the FOIA specifically addresses the ‘Review of Decisions.’
The Ombudsman’s decision stemmed from a review initiated by civic activist Jeremy Enriquez after the Attorney General’s Chambers denied a FOIA request for details on payments to private law firms retained by the Belizean government for redistricting-related litigation. The Ombudsman ordered partial disclosure, requiring the release of the names of attorneys or law firms involved and the total amounts paid to each, with redactions limited to legitimately exempt material.
As of October 23, Enriquez reported no updates from the Ombudsman’s Office since the directive was issued on October 15, though the two-week compliance period had not yet expired. The October 28th appeal effectively bypasses the next procedural step outlined in Section 38 of the FOIA, bringing the matter directly before the High Court for resolution.
-
Column: Realiteit en waarheid zijn niet populair bij de VHP
The VHP, once a beacon of honest governance, reform, and innovation, appears to have lost its moral compass entirely. Over the five years it held power, the party failed to prioritize the public interest, instead functioning as a network of influential figures, friends, families, and confidants who shielded one another from accountability. Since its electoral defeat on May 25, this image has only grown clearer. The VHP is no longer a national people’s party but a collection of individuals hiding under the same orange umbrella. Principles have been overshadowed by personalities, particularly those who thrive on applause and affirmation. While the party projects an image of internal harmony, a closer look reveals division, bruised egos, and a fear of challenging leadership. The cracks are now impossible to ignore. What stands out most is the party’s opportunistic opposition tactics since its defeat. Issues it could have resolved with its previous majority are now loudly condemned, while problems it once oversaw are disingenuously blamed on others. As society yearns for mature political self-reflection, the VHP prefers to plant political bombs—not to build, but to destroy. Chairman Chan Santokhi seems trapped in his own reality, dismissing the defeat with comforting falsehoods, as if the electorate misunderstood his achievements rather than the party itself. Outside the party’s walls, this belief has long evaporated. The lack of honesty was evident this week when spokesperson Dew Sharman questioned the integrity of Starnieuws, denying a report about the departure of senior board member Sidik Moertabat, who had confirmed his exit in an interview. Instead of acknowledging the facts, Sharman chose denial and discredited the media—a telling sign of the party’s character. This is not an isolated incident. Whenever internal issues arise, the VHP avoids political reality, addressing it opportunistically, as seen in its political appointments and dismissals of loyalists. This behavior reflects arrogance—a mix of power, self-deception, and fear of the truth. A party that claims to uphold values should know better. Democracy demands not compliance but courage—the courage to face the truth, even when it’s painful.