分类: politics

  • ‘Government alone cannot build a dynamic economy’, says opposition leader

    ‘Government alone cannot build a dynamic economy’, says opposition leader

    In a pointed address during parliamentary debate over the 2026/2027 national budget this Thursday, Dominica’s Opposition Leader Jesma Paul-Victor has laid out a bold alternative framework for sustainable economic development, arguing that the island nation cannot build a truly dynamic, future-proof economy through government action alone.

    According to Paul-Victor, lasting and inclusive economic transformation depends on building robust, collaborative ties between the public sector and a broad cross-section of private stakeholders. While she acknowledged that government holds a critical foundational role in national economic development, she emphasized it cannot act as the sole engine of progress.

    “Governments can construct ports. Governments can invest in hospitals and schools. But governments alone cannot create a dynamic economy,” Paul-Victor said in her address to lawmakers.

    The opposition leader stressed that long-term shared prosperity requires active engagement and leadership from a diverse group of economic actors, including private investors, local entrepreneurs, domestic manufacturers, smallholder and commercial farmers, innovative technology firms, and the nation’s growing cohort of young professional leaders, all of whom drive new business creation and expansion across the country.

    In her view, the core responsibility of the Dominica government is to lay the foundational conditions that allow these private groups to thrive. She outlined that key prerequisites for attracting investment and unlocking widespread economic opportunity include consistent, stable policy frameworks, streamlined and efficient public institutions, modern, reliable critical infrastructure, affordably priced energy for businesses and households, clear and predictable regulatory systems, and expanded access to affordable financing for small and medium enterprises.

    Paul-Victor also drew attention to the rapid structural shifts reshaping the global economy today, highlighting the outsized and growing influence of emerging sectors – including artificial intelligence, cross-border digital commerce, renewable energy, and climate change adaptation – that will define future economic opportunity for small island nations like Dominica.

    She argued that Dominica cannot afford to only address immediate economic challenges, and must proactively plan to meet the demands of the evolving global economy to remain competitive. “We should become a regional leader in renewable energy, climate resilience, digital government, remote professional services, sustainable tourism, high-value agriculture, creative industries,” she asserted.

    A core focus of Paul-Victor’s proposal is centering young Dominicans in long-term economic planning. She emphasized that all current public and private investments must be designed to equip young people with the in-demand skills and accessible opportunities required to compete in a rapidly changing global marketplace.

    Beyond centering youth, the opposition leader also called for a reevaluation of how Dominica measures economic success, arguing that traditional indicators such as Gross Domestic Product do not capture the full picture of inclusive growth that improves everyday life.

    “Success must also be measured by the number of young people who choose to remain in Dominica because meaningful opportunities exist. The number of small businesses that expand. The number of farmers whose incomes increase. The number of families who become homeowners. The number of graduates who find rewarding employment,” she said.

    For Paul-Victor, these on-the-ground outcomes for ordinary citizens are the most meaningful metrics to assess whether an economy is actually delivering improved quality of life across the country.

  • Saudi-Arabië, Pakistan en Turkije tekenen defensieakkoord te midden van regionale spanningen

    Saudi-Arabië, Pakistan en Turkije tekenen defensieakkoord te midden van regionale spanningen

    Against a backdrop of rising military volatility across the Middle East, three major Muslim-majority nations — Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan — have signed a landmark trilateral defence agreement that treats an armed attack on any one signatory as an attack on all three, Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has confirmed.

    Dated August 7 and signed in the Saudi holy city of Mecca during a gathering of top leaders from the three countries, the landmark pact is officially named the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement. The deal deepens long-standing security coordination between the three nations at a moment of growing uncertainty for regional security.

    The signing follows a diplomatic and spiritual visit to Mecca by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, where the two leaders held closed-door talks with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman ahead of putting pen to paper on the agreement. The pact is framed as a symbolic demonstration of the three states’ shared commitment to strengthening collective security, and advancing peace, stability and shared prosperity across the Middle East and beyond.

    Regional security has deteriorated sharply since a joint U.S.-Israeli offensive against Iran in February, which triggered a wave of retaliatory attacks by Iranian-aligned Houthi and pro-Iran militias targeting Saudi Arabia and its regional allies. These sustained attacks have put Saudi Arabia’s critical oil export infrastructure at risk, threaten to derail the kingdom’s ambitious Vision 2030 economic development agenda, and have sparked growing skepticism among Saudi leaders about the reliability of long-standing U.S. security guarantees for the region.

    While neither Turkey nor Pakistan has faced direct attacks in the current wave of regional conflict, both governments have moved to address growing risks that escalating tensions could undermine their own national security and economic growth. The new defence agreement builds on decades of incremental military cooperation between the three nations: Pakistan has a history of training Saudi military personnel, Turkey and Pakistan have long exchanged arms and military expertise, and in 2023 Riyadh finalized a major multi-billion dollar contract to purchase advanced Turkish drones for its armed forces.

    Security analysts widely view the new pact as the foundation for an emerging regional security architecture that unites three of the world’s most populous Muslim nations. The alliance combines unique strategic strengths: Pakistan boasts a nuclear deterrent and one of the world’s largest professional standing armies, Turkey fields advanced domestic weapons systems and holds a NATO membership, while Saudi Arabia brings vast financial and economic clout to the partnership.

    Though the agreement is explicitly framed as a defensive pact, experts anticipate it will also catalyze expanded economic collaboration between the three signatories. Analysts note the pact is designed to balance deterrence against potential aggression with diplomatic outreach, with the ultimate goal of de-escalating regional tensions and laying the groundwork for long-term stability across the Middle East.

  • PM Skerrit extends praise to opposition leader following budget debate

    PM Skerrit extends praise to opposition leader following budget debate

    In a notable display of cross-aisle civility in Dominica’s parliament, Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit has publicly extended heartfelt gratitude to Leader of the Opposition Jesma Paul-Victor for her measured response to the 2026/2027 national budget address delivered this Thursday.

    Skerrit took to social media following the parliamentary sitting to share his positive assessment of Paul-Victor’s engagement, framing her contribution as balanced, thoughtful, and marked by a level of political maturity uncommon in deeply partisan political landscapes. He has long argued that collaborative governance, rooted in mutual respect between ruling and opposition parties, is the only sustainable path to lifting Dominica and improving outcomes for all its citizens. In his view, moving beyond unproductive, blind partisanship is a critical precondition for meaningful national progress.

    The prime minister stressed that even with fundamental policy and ideological differences between the ruling administration and the opposition, Paul-Victor’s approach to the budget debate proved that Dominican politics can rise above petty squabbling. He noted that parliamentary discourse can remain civil, focused on advancing the public good rather than scoring political points, a standard he says the Dominican public rightfully demands from all elected representatives.

    Skerrit drew a clear line between partisan interests and national priorities, emphasizing that large-scale transformative projects currently underway across the island are not the property of any single political faction. Key initiatives including the construction of the new international airport, the development of domestic geothermal energy capacity, and the rollout of climate-resilient public infrastructure exist to serve all Dominican people, regardless of political affiliation.

    Closing his remarks, the prime minister reaffirmed his administration’s long-standing commitment to open, inclusive governance. He confirmed the government will maintain an open-door policy for constructive dialogue with the opposition, and remains dedicated to working across party lines to build a more prosperous future for every Dominican family.

  • Goodridge raises penalty ‘mismatch’ in new ownership law

    Goodridge raises penalty ‘mismatch’ in new ownership law

    During Wednesday’s legislative debate on the Beneficial Ownership Transparency and Register Act, opposition senator Karina Goodridge has raised urgent calls for aligning penalties for unauthorized confidential information disclosure with the strict sanctions already outlined in the nation’s Data Protection Act, warning that the currently proposed weak penalties fail to act as an effective deterrent against harmful leaks.

    Goodridge drew direct attention to a stark discrepancy in punishment between the two pieces of legislation: under the new beneficial ownership framework, unauthorized disclosure of sensitive personal data carries a maximum penalty of just a $40,000 fine or one year of imprisonment. By contrast, the Data Protection Act, which governs similar sensitive confidential information, imposes penalties that reach up to $500,000 in fines and three years of prison time for identical offenses.

    The opposition lawmaker emphasized that once sensitive confidential information is leaked and distributed, the damage is irreversible. Information that falls into malicious hands, she warned, can open the door to widespread misuse, fraud, and other harmful outcomes that have lasting impacts on affected individuals. Goodridge specifically pointed to Section 9 of the new beneficial ownership act, which addresses data breach incidents, but argued that the proposed penalties do not match the severity of this serious criminal offense.

    Questioning the logic behind the divergent sentencing guidelines, Goodridge asked why identical confidential information deserves far weaker legal protection simply because it is stored and regulated under a different act of parliament. She called on legislative members to adopt the same tough penalty structure already enshrined in the Data Protection Act for unauthorized disclosures of beneficial ownership data.

    Goodridge also dismissed the proposed one-year prison sentence as inadequate to discourage potential offenders, noting that the short sentence is too minor to create meaningful deterrence: “One year imprisonment, that is only one Christmas missed. That is not really a deterrent. Some people may look at it and say, well, one Christmas… I don’t miss that.” On the topic of financial penalties, she added that a $40,000 fine is easily manageable for many potential offenders to save up over time, while a $500,000 fine poses a significant financial consequence that would push most people to comply with the law and avoid risky, illegal behavior. Maintaining that all unauthorized leaks of confidential information are equally serious regardless of what legislation governs the data, Goodridge pressed lawmakers to revise the penalty structure before finalizing the new bill.

  • Paul-Victor calls for lasting solutions to Dominica’s cost of living crisis

    Paul-Victor calls for lasting solutions to Dominica’s cost of living crisis

    As the Dominican government lays out its 2026-2027 national budget, the country’s opposition is pushing back against what it calls a misplaced focus on large-scale capital projects, urging policymakers to center the daily economic struggles of ordinary families. Opposition Leader Jesma Paul-Victor made her case in a response to the budget presentation Thursday, framing skyrocketing cost of living as the single most pressing issue facing the Dominican public today. While the governing administration has celebrated its headline infrastructure investments, Paul-Victor says working-class households measure national economic health very differently. “Why is life becoming so expensive?” she posed, pointing to the everyday pressure points that shape household finance: grocery checkout lines, gas station pumps, pharmacy co-pays, monthly rent bills, back-to-school uniform costs, monthly energy invoices, and long-term savings goals that feel increasingly out of reach. In Paul-Victor’s view, no budget can claim success when gleaming new infrastructure coexists with rising economic anxiety across the country’s households. Even as official macroeconomic indicators trend upward, she argues, millions of ordinary Dominicans continue to battle rising costs for the non-negotiable goods and services that form the foundation of daily life. “Food, housing, transportation, utilities, healthcare, education. These are not optional expenses. They are necessities,” she emphasized. Paul-Victor did acknowledge the government’s targeted interventions to ease household strain, including temporary tax and duty cuts on a selection of essential goods, calling these measures a welcome source of short-term relief. Still, she stressed that temporary assistance is no replacement for long-term, structural policy change: “relief alone cannot become permanent policies.” Offering guarded praise for several of the government’s existing tax reforms, Paul-Victor called for incremental adjustments to extend support further. She thanked the administration for introducing a 10 percent flat income tax, eliminating compounding calculations for import goods taxes, and extending a key industrial policy measure, which the finance minister has slated to run through September. Instead, Paul-Victor proposed extending the policy through December to deliver longer-lasting support for local businesses and households. The opposition leader laid out a clear alternative policy vision, arguing that sustained improvements in living standards depend on centering policies that shape everyday household financial security, both directly and indirectly. She explained that the country’s long-term goal must be expanding household purchasing power by boosting local productivity, supporting wage growth, and cutting the structural costs of doing business across Dominica. Paul-Victor framed stable employment as the critical link between overall economic expansion and broad-based social progress. “When people have stable employment, families become more secure. Businesses expand, communities thrive, government revenues increase,” she noted. Addressing the finance minister’s recent boast that Dominica hit 4.5 percent economic growth last year — outpacing the global average of 3.5 percent and the regional average of 3 percent — Paul-Victor questioned whether that growth has translated into tangible gains for ordinary people. “But was this growth only visible in concrete? It must be visible in kitchens, in pay packets, in business incomes, in opportunities for young people,” she said. Paul-Victor noted the budget is being drafted at a make-or-break moment for the small island nation, which faces a cascade of external pressures: volatile global economic conditions, growing climate threats that disproportionately hurt small island developing states, shifting global investment flows, and evolving international scrutiny of the country’s citizenship-by-investment program, a point the finance minister himself acknowledged in his budget address. These challenging global realities demand careful, proactive governance rather than overconfident complacency, Paul-Victor argued. “They require diversification rather than dependence. They require institutions that command confidence at home and abroad,” she emphasized. Rejecting expectations that budget debate would devolve into empty partisan sloganeering, Paul-Victor positioned the opposition as a constructive partner for national progress. “We reject that approach. The people of Dominica deserve something better. They deserve an opposition prepared not merely to criticize but to contribute. Not merely to identify weaknesses, but to propose solutions. Not merely to point out risks, but to offer alternatives,” she said. In line with this approach, she called for strict accountability for all public spending: every dollar allocated by parliament must deliver measurable public value, every major project must produce clear tangible benefits, and every campaign and policy promise must be judged on its actual results. Turning to the employment impact of the country’s recent infrastructure boom, Paul-Victor raised urgent questions about the long-term stability of the construction-sector jobs created by these projects. “The question before us, however, is what happens after construction ends? When the airport is completed, when the geothermal plant is fully operational, when the marina opens, when major road projects conclude, will sufficient permanent employment exist to absorb the skilled workers who have contributed to these national projects?” she asked. To address this gap, Paul-Victor proposed that every large public infrastructure investment must be paired with a formal, transparent employment transition strategy. “Construction must lead to commerce. Commerce must lead to enterprise. Enterprise must lead to permanent jobs,” she explained. “That is how investment becomes lasting prosperity.”

  • Paul-Victor says budget must deliver results, not just promises

    Paul-Victor says budget must deliver results, not just promises

    During a parliamentary address Thursday responding to the newly unveiled 2026-2027 national budget, Dominica’s Opposition Leader Jesma Paul-Victor outlined a balanced, principle-driven approach to the government’s latest fiscal plan, emphasizing that opposition cooperation hinges on transparency, tangible delivery and a shared commitment to advancing all Dominicans’ well-being.

    Paul-Victor opened her remarks by stressing that the opposition is not ideologically opposed to pro-development policies. She affirmed that the opposition welcomes any genuine initiative that moves Dominica forward, strengthens its economic foundation, upgrades public services, and creates new opportunities for citizens across the country. Rejecting the idea that patriotism is the exclusive domain of any single political party, she noted that the aspirations of all Dominicans cut across partisan lines.

    “Every Dominican, regardless of who they support politically, shares the same core hopes: a stronger national economy, upgraded schools, modern medical facilities, climate-resilient infrastructure, affordable energy, thriving local enterprises, and stable, secure jobs,” Paul-Victor told the chamber. She added that progress benefits everyone: when infrastructure is built, communities gain; when education improves, children and future generations gain; when healthcare access expands, every family gains; and when the agricultural sector prospers, the entire nation prospers. No opposition parliamentarian, she stressed, stands in the way of authentic development that improves public life.

    “We stand ready to back every investment that lifts the lives of Dominican people and secures a stronger future for our nation,” she said. “But our constitutional duty is not simply to cheer for government project announcements. Our responsibility is to hold the executive to account: to verify that projects are executed efficiently, transparently, on schedule, within allocated budgets, and aligned with the interests of the taxpayers who fund them.”

    To guide that oversight, Paul-Victor put forward three core questions that every national budget must be measured against. First, are ordinary Dominicans better off today than they were in previous years? Second, has the government delivered on all the commitments it made in last year’s budget? Third, does the current budget outline a realistic, achievable path to widespread prosperity for all citizens across the island?

    She acknowledged that Finance Minister Dr. Irving McIntyre laid out an ambitious, transformative vision for Dominica in his budget address, with proposals including a new international airport, utility-scale geothermal energy development, a world-class marina, climate-resilient affordable housing, modernized road networks, a new cruise tourism village, expanded agricultural support, investment in the creative economy, digitalization of government services, and renewed engagement with the Dominican diaspora. Many of these initiatives, Paul-Victor said, are valuable and deserve broad national backing.

    But she drew a clear distinction between announcing an inspiring vision and actually delivering measurable results. “Governments are not elected just to give people hope. They are elected to turn that hope into concrete, visible progress for communities across the country,” she argued. “Budgets are not judged by how eloquent the minister’s speech is. They are judged by whether the promises made in this parliamentary chamber become tangible improvements in communities from Portsmouth, Grand Bay, and Marigot to Wesley, Castle Bruce, Roseau, Soufrière, Salisbury, and every small village in between.”

    Paul-Victor argued that before the nation can consider the new commitments laid out in the 2026-2027 budget, the government must first account for the promises it made in past budget cycles. She specifically referenced the wide-ranging commitments for infrastructure, housing, agriculture, tourism, education, healthcare, public sector modernization, and economic growth made in the 2025 budget, noting that Dominicans deserve more than a new list of future plans — they deserve a full public accounting of past performance.

    “How many of last year’s projects are running behind schedule? How many have already exceeded their original budgets? How many have actually delivered the outcomes they were originally designed to deliver?” she asked. Echoing a common educational framework, she noted that governments, just like students, should not receive new assignments until they have completed and accounted for the work they were already given.

    Paul-Victor also pointed to a critical disconnect that often emerges between top-line macroeconomic data and the daily lived experience of ordinary Dominican households. “Official numbers can show economic growth while working families still struggle to make ends meet. Aggregate investment can rise while average wages stay stuck in place. Total public spending can go up while household purchasing power keeps falling,” she explained.

    For the opposition, the only true measure of a budget’s success lies in the micro-level realities facing ordinary people on the ground. “The success of this nation cannot be measured only by how many millions of dollars are allocated in budget documents,” she said. “It is measured by whether parents can afford school supplies for their children, whether young college graduates can find meaningful, well-paying work at home, whether small-scale farmers earn a fair return for their crops, whether small local businesses can stay open and grow, whether retired pensioners can afford the rising cost of food and medicine, and whether young families see a future for themselves and their children here in Dominica, rather than having to seek opportunity abroad.”

  • Jogi wil openheid over miljoenensteun aan SLM

    Jogi wil openheid over miljoenensteun aan SLM

    A ruling party parliamentarian in Suriname has formally pushed the national government to open its books on public funding allocated to Suriname’s flag carrier, Surinaamse Luchtvaart Maatschappij (SLM), calling for full clarity on how much taxpayer money the airline has received and what tangible outcomes have been delivered with that support.

    Mahinder Jogi, a member of the National Assembly for the VHP party, raised a series of formal questions during Thursday’s plenary session focused on current affairs, pressing the administration of President Jennifer Simons to answer for the ongoing subsidies flowing to the struggling state-owned airline.

    Jogi opened his questioning by recalling a core campaign pledge from President Simons ahead of her inauguration: before taking office, Simons positioned both the revitalization of SLM and the expansion of Suriname’s tourism sector as top policy priorities for her administration. Despite that promised focus, Jogi told the assembly that the public has been given no clear accounting of how public funds allocated to the airline have been used.

    According to Jogi, SLM currently receives millions of U.S. dollars in government support every single month. The parliamentarian put forward a direct targeted question to the cabinet: what is the full cumulative sum of subsidies that SLM has received over the first full year of the Simons administration?

    Beyond the total amount of funding, Jogi is demanding details on the concrete progress that has been delivered with the public investment. He has asked the government to confirm whether the airline’s overall financial standing has actually improved following a year of sustained subsidies, whether the carrier has added new jobs to its workforce, and whether any foreign consulting firms have been contracted with the public funds.

    Jogi has formally requested that the executive branch provide the National Assembly with a complete, detailed response to his questions as quickly as possible, to meet basic standards of parliamentary and public transparency.

  • Beckles challenges PM’s ‘15,000 jobs’ claim

    Beckles challenges PM’s ‘15,000 jobs’ claim

    A deep political rift over Trinidad and Tobago’s employment landscape has erupted, as Opposition Leader Pennelope Beckles has publicly called into question Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s bold assertion that the current administration has added 15,000 new jobs to the national economy over a 12-month period.

    Speaking at the Opposition’s weekly press briefing in Port of Spain on the previous day, Beckles anchored her challenge in official data released by the country’s Central Statistical Office (CSO). The official figures, she confirmed, show that total employment across the nation dropped by 5,900 positions between the final quarter of 2025 and the first quarter of 2026. Over the same window, the national unemployment rate climbed from 4.3% to 5.4%, with female workers bearing a disproportionate share of the employment decline.

    Beckles rejected the government’s attempt to frame the contraction as a routine seasonal shift tied to post-Christmas holiday hiring patterns, noting that job cuts rippled across nearly every major sector of the national economy. CSO data, she said, recorded employment declines between January and March 2026 in petroleum and gas, mining and quarrying, manufacturing, utilities, construction, transportation and logistics, communications, community services, and agriculture. This broad-based drop directly contradicts the Prime Minister’s claim of 15,000 net jobs created between April 2025 and April 2026, she argued.

    She also brought attention to Persad-Bissessar’s own admission that two major government work programs, CEPEP and URP, have been severely undermined by systemic inefficiency and widespread corruption. In a direct challenge to the Prime Minister, Beckles asked: “I want to ask the Prime Minister whether or not the Prime Minister stands by the figures that they have produced, 15,000 jobs delivered?”

    Beyond the immediate 15,000 job claim, Beckles raised new doubts about the government’s core election pledge to create 50,000 new jobs during its term, noting that the latest official figures make meeting that target increasingly unlikely. She added that opposition constituency offices across the country continue to be flooded with requests from unemployed constituents seeking work, saying: “They can tell you the category when persons come to their offices. What are people coming for? Books and uniforms, jobs, jobs, jobs. But this Government will have you believe that they have created so much jobs.”

    Beckles also pushed back against claims attributed to Persad-Bissessar that recent job losses stemmed from the elimination of so-called “ghost programmes” — state-funded schemes riddled with criminal activity and corruption. She argued that these remarks unfairly stigmatize thousands of innocent workers who have lost their livelihoods, calling on female workers, who have seen the steepest employment drops, to take note of the prime minister’s characterization. While Beckles acknowledged that a small share of working-age citizens may be unwilling to take up employment, she condemned the government for painting all recently laid-off workers with a broad brush of corruption and idleness: “But you want to tell the people of Trinidad and Tobago, having fired almost 50,000 people, that you want to tell everybody, all of them involved in drugs, everything was freeness, everything was corruption, and everything was ghosts.”

    In addition to the broader national employment debate, Beckles criticized the government’s inaction on the looming crisis at Hilton Trinidad, where an unresolved lease dispute threatens to put up to 300 workers out of a job. The union representing hotel staff has confirmed that more than 250 people are currently employed at the property, and workers have been warned that the hotel could close within weeks if the lease is not renewed. Beckles demanded immediate clarity from both the Prime Minister and the Minister of Trade on the status of the lease negotiations to protect the affected workers’ livelihoods.

  • Telemaque backs IDs for easier payments

    Telemaque backs IDs for easier payments

    A proposed national policy that would require all people aged 16 and older — including both local citizens and foreign visitors — to carry valid official identification in all public spaces has sparked a range of responses across Trinidad and Tobago, with stakeholders in the country’s iconic steelpan community largely backing the plan while some members of the public have raised privacy and ideological concerns.

    The policy announcement came last Wednesday from Homeland Security Minister Roger Alexander, who confirmed the administration would move forward with drafting and enacting new legislation to formalize the mandatory ID requirement. The proposal has since opened up dialogue across different sectors of society, with steelpan organizers, one of the nation’s most culturally significant community groups, highlighting unexpected practical benefits the rule could deliver for young pannists participating in the country’s world-famous Panorama steelband competition.

    Speaking to reporters Tuesday on the sidelines of the launch of two new steelpan-themed tracks — *Unshakeable Queen of Pan* and *Pannists’ Achievements* — held at Port of Spain’s Queen’s Park Savannah, Clyde Telemaque, external relations officer for Pan Trinbago, the governing body for steelpan in Trinidad and Tobago, explained that formal ID would streamline payment processes for minor participants aged 10 to 14 who take part in Panorama events. Telemaque noted that currently, many young pannists lack official identification, which in turn prevents them from opening personal bank accounts. This forces organizers to issue competition payments to parents or guardians, creating confusion and unfair barriers for the young musicians who earned the funds. By requiring ID for all people 16 and up, Telemaque argued, the new policy will build a formal pathway for younger participants to get their own ID and bank accounts, simplifying the entire remuneration process both during and after Panorama events.

    Terry Bernard, vice president of Pan Trinbago, also expressed his full support for the policy, saying he backed any measure that he believes will advance national progress. Rejecting reflexive opposition for political purposes, Bernard said the public should extend trust to the elected government to craft policies that serve the public good, adding that he also supports expanded police checkpoints tied to the policy. Beyond the ID rule itself, Bernard tied the policy to Pan Trinbago’s broader mission of drawing more young people into steelbands, framing steelpan communities as sacred local spaces that teach critical values including etiquette, teamwork, and national patriotism while opening life-changing opportunities for children and youth.

    Other prominent cultural figures echoed this measured support. Renowned poet Eintou Pearl Springer noted she already carries her ID at all times and has no objection to the mandate, acknowledging that all policies carry both potential benefits and drawbacks but arguing that ordinary citizens should not face undue punishment for minor compliance issues. Roger Thomas, manager of the Curepe-based Moods Steel Orchestra, framed the policy as a progressive step to align Trinidad and Tobago’s public safety framework with international norms, pointing out that similar mandatory ID rules are already in place in the United Kingdom.

    Some private citizens also voiced support, with one parent noting that obtaining official ID is a widely accepted rite of passage into adulthood, and that they had already secured an ID for their child independent of the government’s proposed mandate. But not all reactions have been positive. Jason, a Port of Spain taxi driver, argued that the rule is a sweeping surveillance measure that allows authorities to track the movements of all residents. He specifically referenced the recent police manhunt and fatal shooting of escaped prisoner Robby Khadoo in San Fernando as an example of the tracking capabilities the government already holds, and claimed the policy would help authorities restrict the movement of Venezuelan migrants in the country, adding that he believes informants already help police monitor civilian activity. One female member of the public also launched an angry, profanity-laced critique of the policy, directing her anger at opposition leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar over the proposal.

  • Politieke overgangsgesprekken Venezuela beginnen zonder Machado

    Politieke overgangsgesprekken Venezuela beginnen zonder Machado

    Seven months after U.S. military intervention ousted former Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro and installed an interim government led by Delcy Rodríguez under close Washington oversight, long-awaited political negotiations between the acting administration and a faction of the country’s opposition have finally launched in Caracas, following nearly a week of postponement, representatives from both sides confirmed this week.

    The talks, which are being hosted at the La Carlota military base with restricted media access allowing only photojournalists on site, are framed as a first step toward overhauling Venezuela’s political system and laying the groundwork for long-delayed democratic elections, ending a years-long period of crippling political and economic crisis that has left the South American nation deeply divided.

    A notable absence from the negotiation table is Maria Corina Machado, the popular opposition leader and Nobel Peace Prize laureate who currently lives in exile and was not extended an invitation to participate. Machado claimed that U.S. President Donald Trump blocked her planned return to Venezuela to join the talks, an allegation Washington has repeatedly denied. Despite being sidelined, Machado has said she will not obstruct the dialogue process, and expressed hope the talks would deliver a full democratic transition for her home country.

    The opposition negotiating delegation is led by Dinorah Figuera, a former opposition lawmaker who returned to Venezuela from exile this week. Figuera heads the opposition bloc that won a majority in the 2015 National Assembly election, the last vote widely recognized as legitimate by the international community. Upon arriving at Caracas’s international airport, Figuera told local broadcaster Televen that her core priority is the official launch of an open dialogue process aimed at restoring fully functional democratic institutions to Venezuela.

    Her key demands include sweeping reforms to Venezuela’s Supreme Court and National Electoral Council, two bodies that drew widespread international criticism for validating Maduro’s contested 2024 re-election, a result the opposition rejected at the time, alleging widespread voter fraud and claiming victory for their own candidate.

    Representing the interim government is Jorge Rodríguez, current president of the National Assembly and brother of interim leader Delcy Rodríguez. The official negotiating agenda covers a range of pressing domestic issues, including ongoing recovery efforts following the devastating dual earthquakes that struck the country on June 24, which killed more than 6,000 Venezuelans. Other topics on the table include strengthening democratic safeguards and expanding protections for political rights across the country.

    The U.S. Department of State, which backs the negotiation process, has welcomed the launch of face-to-face talks between the two sides. “These direct discussions present a unique opportunity to move Venezuela forward,” a State Department spokesperson said in a statement, calling on all stakeholders to support efforts to deliver tangible, positive outcomes for the Venezuelan people. The spokesperson emphasized Washington’s commitment to supporting national stabilization, economic recovery, political reconciliation and a peaceful democratic transition in the country.

    Trump has repeatedly publicly praised the interim government’s efforts to open Venezuela’s critical mining, electricity and oil sectors to foreign and private investment, a policy shift aligned with U.S. economic interests in the region. Writing on social platform X, Machado noted that a successful democratic transition would restore freedom and prosperity to Venezuelans, and turn the country into a “vital and reliable partner for U.S. national security and regional stability.” She added that “the Venezuelan people are enthusiastic and ready” for long-awaited political change, a sentiment widely shared across much of the country after years of ongoing crisis.