分类: politics

  • Government announces first auction of assets seized from criminal networks

    Government announces first auction of assets seized from criminal networks

    In a groundbreaking step toward combating organized crime and redirecting illicit gains toward public welfare, the Dominican Republic is preparing to host its nation’s first-ever public auction of assets confiscated from transnational and domestic criminal networks. This unprecedented initiative, spearheaded by the National Institute for the Custody and Administration of Seized and Confiscated Assets (INCABIDE), is rooted in the country’s current legal framework, with a clear mission to turn illegally obtained property into sustainable funding for community-focused social programs.

    Slated to take place on May 13 at the Autonomous University of Santo Domingo, the upcoming auction features a diverse catalog of seized properties ranging from private aircraft and luxury yachts to residential and commercial real estate, high-end vehicles, and premium jewelry. All items up for bid have been definitively linked to serious criminal activities, including large-scale drug trafficking, cross-border money laundering, and public sector corruption, authorities confirmed.

    For individuals and entities interested in participating, the Dominican government has outlined clear registration requirements. All bidders must complete their registration in person by May 1 at INCABIDE’s headquarters located in Arroyo Hondo Viejo, and submit a non-refundable registration fee of 5,000 Dominican pesos (RD$). For high-value assets with a minimum valuation exceeding RD$5 million, participants are additionally required to put down a 10% deposit of the asset’s base value to secure their bidding eligibility.

    Officials leading the initiative have stressed that every asset included in the auction has completed the full legal adjudication process outlined under the country’s Law 60-23, guaranteeing that successful buyers will receive full, clear and unencumbered ownership of their purchases. Once the auction concludes, all net proceeds will be allocated exclusively to crime prevention initiatives and social compensation programs designed to support communities harmed by criminal activity.

    This landmark event is widely viewed as a pivotal milestone for the Dominican Republic’s anti-crime and governance reform efforts, demonstrating the government’s commitment to increasing institutional transparency and turning criminal assets into resources that deliver tangible benefits to the general public, rather than allowing illicit gains to remain in the hands of criminal networks.

  • Another April 16th in the daily battle for irrevocability

    Another April 16th in the daily battle for irrevocability

    April 16 returns once more, bringing with it the annual gathering that decades have not been able to erase, held at the iconic intersection of 23rd and 12th Streets in Havana. It is a moment etched deep into the collective memory of the Cuban people, for it was on this site that Fidel Castro publicly confirmed what many already felt in their hearts: the revolution born at Moncada, forged during the Granma expedition and nurtured in the Sierra Maestra and lowland campaign had always been a socialist revolution. This was no empty rhetorical flourish; it was a declaration of fact: Cubans were building something new, something entirely their own, a system that fit no pre-written foreign manual and answered to no outside political slogan.

    A false narrative peddled by critics who refuse to accept that a small, heavily blockaded sovereign nation has the right to chart its own independent course claims that Cuban socialism was imposed from outside. But this claim could not be further from the truth. Cuban socialism is the product of the organic, endogenous evolution of Cuban national consciousness, born on this island out of a urgent need to build a political and social order diametrically opposed to the decades of exploitation and foreign domination that defined colonial rule.

    Today, as Cuba navigates the deepest economic crisis it has faced in decades, compounded by a tightened U.S. blockade that has strained household budgets and tested national morale, some have questioned whether the choice to pursue an independent socialist path was a mistake. The author pushes back against this doubt, arguing that global capitalism’s current model of endless overconsumption is ecologically and socially unsustainable on a planetary scale. How many additional Earths would be required to sustain the reckless wastefulness of a system that measures human worth by how much an individual consumes? Even amid decades of blockade and hardship, Cuba stands as a living proof that another path is possible. This path is not perfect, nor is it a miracle cure for every challenge, but it is the only system that guarantees that every resource the nation has—whether little or much—is shared equitably across the entire population. It proves that a new global order built on cooperation and collective solidarity rather than exploitation is achievable.

    One of the core challenges facing contemporary Cuban socialism, the author argues, is reinterpreting Marxist thought to fit the daily lived experience of ordinary Cubans—translating its core principles into the language people use while waiting in bread lines, riding public buses, walking down neighborhood streets, and gathering with friends. If Cuba’s socialist model were truly a failure, it would never have survived decades of unrelenting, increasingly harsh pressure from a hostile foreign empire. While external enemies are a very real threat, the author stresses that Cubans must also be willing to look inward and acknowledge the internal weaknesses that have held the project back.

    From the revolutionary camp, which remains unwavering in its commitment to building a more just and prosperous Cuba, there are many internal ills that demand open confrontation. Suffocating bureaucratic bloat, widespread indolence, and a persistent tendency to prioritize low-effort shortcuts over long-term collective good are dangerous weaknesses that must be discussed openly. This is not an exercise in self-flagellation; it is a necessary correction: a socialism that refuses to engage in honest self-criticism is a socialism that stagnates, stops progressing, and in the face of aggressive global capitalism, stagnation is fatal.

    Currently, Cuba faces a sustained campaign of cultural hegemony aimed at pushing the nation toward restoring a dependent, predatory form of capitalism—one that turns popular need into a profit opportunity for elites and frames collective solidarity as a weakness. Yet despite this pressure, Cuba remains firm in its commitment to continue building an independent, distinctly Cuban form of socialism, one that does not reject the goals of shared prosperity and long-term environmental sustainability.

    Entrenching the irreversibility of the socialist project is not just an empty slogan to print on banners and ignore; it is a core mandate enshrined in Cuba’s 2019 constitution, ratified by popular vote, that must be re-earned every single day by ordinary Cubans: on factory floors, in agricultural fields, in school classrooms, in doctors’ offices, and in neighborhood grocery stores. Irreversibility is not a guaranteed state of grace; it is a daily battle against apathy, against discouragement, and against the false myth that all political and economic systems are equally good for the Cuban people.

    The path forward demands more open theoretical reflection, more robust public debate about the nature of Cuban socialism, and a renewed commitment to putting those ideas into transformative revolutionary practice. It requires rejecting the stigma attached to the word communism, which has been the target of decades of vicious enemy propaganda, and proving that the generation of Cubans who launched this project were not wrong to choose this path. Cubans must carry forward this work with the same passion that drove their ancestors on that April 16, when a people armed with nothing but their dignity declared that their future would not be shaped by capitalism.

    The author draws on personal experience to illustrate the human cost of abandoning socialism, having known many people whose lives were upended after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the dismantling of socialism in the German Democratic Republic, a nation far more economically developed than Cuba. Some of these people have fared better than others, but all share a common understanding: they lost the system they fought for and believed in, they discovered it was impossible to extract only the positive elements of competing systems, and they watched racism and systemic discrimination reemerge in their homeland. Professionals lost their standing: a prosecutor was forced into a position like a criminal defendant, a doctor refused to treat patients as paying customers, a university rector lost his academic position, even dissidents found their work lost purpose without the system they opposed. Many now feel like strangers in their own native country. The author warns that the pain of losing the socialist project Cubans built would be far deeper, given Cuban national identity, if the nation were to abandon its path.

    There is no use in self-deception: Cuba would not see the wealthy, developed form of capitalism enjoyed by wealthy Western nations if it abandoned socialism. Instead, it would be left with the same exploitative, unequal form of predatory capitalism that has left deep poverty and instability across Haiti, Central America, and much of the African continent, where stories of displacement and deprivation are far worse than what Cuba currently faces.

    That is why this April 16 remains as meaningful as ever: it is a yearly rendezvous with a history that is both a living part of the present and a blueprint for the future. This year, more strongly than ever, the Cuban people continue to choose their own brand of socialism: perfectible, open to improvement, but fundamentally just and humane. This is the same socialism proclaimed on that Havana street corner, successfully defended at the Bay of Pigs, and later enshrined as an irrevocable national project. It is the socialism that the Cuban Constitution guarantees all citizens the right to defend by arms if necessary, and it remains the only viable path for Cuba, here, now, and always.

  • Bay of Pigs, 65 years on: “Analyzing its legacy is not an exercise in nostalgia, it is a strategic necessity”

    Bay of Pigs, 65 years on: “Analyzing its legacy is not an exercise in nostalgia, it is a strategic necessity”

    HAVANA – A landmark theoretical workshop convened to mark the 65th anniversary of Cuba’s Bay of Pigs victory over foreign invasion wrapped up Wednesday at the Fidel Castro Ruz Center, bringing together nearly 200 participants from 19 national institutions and veteran combatants of the 1961 campaign to reaffirm the battle’s enduring strategic relevance for Cuba’s modern fight for sovereignty.

    Organized by the Ideological Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba, the Institute of Cuban History, the Office of Historical Affairs, and the Fidel Castro Ruz Center, the three-day gathering titled “Bay of Pigs, 65 Years after the great victory against imperialism” delivered substantive outcomes, pairing 19 academic presentations with supplementary cultural programming including book launches and documentary screenings.

    Addressing attendees in closing proceedings, Rolando Yero Travieso, head of the Social Sector Affairs Department of the Party’s Central Committee, stressed that revisiting the Bay of Pigs legacy is far more than a retrospective historical exercise. “This is a strategic necessity for our nation today,” Yero explained. “The Bay of Pigs stands as the first major military defeat of U.S.-led imperialism in the Americas, and the lessons of resistance forged over 72 hours of combat continue to light our path as we defend Cuba’s sovereignty, a cause our people have upheld and that has earned admiration from communities across the globe.”

    Noting that the workshop falls on the centennial of revolutionary leader Fidel Castro’s birth, Yero added that examining the 1961 victory is also a way to affirm the lasting value of Castro’s approach to governance and resistance: his unshakable trust in the Cuban people, unwavering ideological clarity, and uncompromising revolutionary commitment. “Today, 65 years after that socialist April, in a world still fractured by imperialist aggression and ongoing fights for national self-determination, Fidel’s words about the Bay of Pigs remain shockingly relevant,” he said.

    René González Barrios, director of the Fidel Castro Ruz Center, highlighted that the personal testimonies shared by Bay of Pigs veterans at the workshop served as a powerful inspiration for young Cuban attendees. The 19 presentations delivered over the course of the event covered core topics including the lead-up to the 1961 invasion, pre-invasion hostile actions by the U.S. military against Cuba, the stark imbalance between the invading force’s heavily weaponized capabilities and Cuba’s militia-led defensive forces, and the enduring validity of the military strategy crafted and led by Fidel Castro during the conflict.

    González Barrios emphasized that the 1961 victory remains a defining source of national pride for Cubans, and a global reference point for anti-imperialist movements across the Americas and the world. He noted that the workshop did not seek to wrap up all existing lines of inquiry into the battle, and announced that the presentations delivered at the event will be compiled into a forthcoming published volume to expand access to their insights.

    The closing ceremony was attended by senior officials and leaders across Cuban political and state institutions, including Yuniasky Crespo Baquero, head of the Ideological Department of the Communist Party Central Committee, representatives of the Revolutionary Armed Forces, the Ministry of the Interior, the Union of Young Communists, and diplomatic representatives accredited to Havana.

  • “Long live the Socialist Revolution!”

    “Long live the Socialist Revolution!”

    On April 16, 2026, Cuban state media Granma published a retrospective marking the 65th anniversary of a defining moment in the island nation’s modern political history. It was on this same date in 1961 that, standing before a massive crowd of grieving yet fiercely patriotic Cubans, Commander-in-Chief Fidel Castro Ruz publicly announced that the Cuban Revolution would take a socialist path.

    The gathering that day was not just a political rally: it was a farewell ceremony for dozens of Cuban civilians and military personnel killed in surprise airstrikes against Cuban airports carried out the previous day by anti-revolutionary forces backed by foreign powers. Tens of thousands of attendees, made up of workers, peasants and ordinary citizens, gathered amid shared grief and soaring nationalist sentiment, gathering to hear the revolution’s leadership outline the movement’s new direction.

    In his historic address, Castro framed the new socialist project as a movement rooted in service to Cuba’s most disadvantaged populations. “Comrades, workers and peasants, this is the socialist and democratic Revolution of the humble, with the humble, and for the humble,” he told the assembled crowd. “And for this Revolution of the humble, by the humble, and for the humble, we are willing to give our lives.”

    That 1961 declaration set Cuba on an unwavering sovereign political and economic course that has remained consistent to the present day, a path chosen by the Cuban people themselves that has shaped the nation’s global identity and domestic policy for more than six decades. The 2026 retrospective includes archival photography from the 1961 event, capturing the scale of the gathering and the emotion of the historic moment.

  • Comptroller’s Office issues new rules to strengthen public payment transparency

    Comptroller’s Office issues new rules to strengthen public payment transparency

    In Santo Domingo, the Dominican Republic’s top financial oversight body has rolled out a updated regulatory framework aimed at tightening transparency, accountability, and transaction tracking for public institution payments tied to credit assignments and factoring operations.

    The new policy, officially signed off by Comptroller General Geraldo Espinosa, was crafted to address gaps in current financial oversight by requiring clear, verifiable identification of every stakeholder involved in these transactions, while strengthening monitoring of all government-connected financial flows. Unlike previous loose guidelines, the new circular sets non-negotiable strict eligibility requirements for any payment request that involves transferred collection rights — any submission that fails to meet these standards will be automatically rejected.

    A core mandate of the new directive requires the assignee (the party receiving the assigned credit rights) to complete registration as an official beneficiary both with the Dominican National Treasury and the country’s central Financial Management Information System, known locally as Sigef, before any payment can receive final approval. For assignees that have not yet completed this registration process, the relevant public institutions are required to guide them through the mandatory registration procedure aligned with existing national financial regulations.

    The circular also clarifies procedural standards for processing payments and applying required tax withholdings. Under the new rules, financial records will first attribute the transaction to the original supplier before the final funds are transferred to the assignee, creating a clear paper trail for auditors. Municipal governments and public entities that currently operate outside the Sigef system have been formally instructed to adjust their internal financial protocols to align with these new oversight guidelines.

    Officials note that this new circular is not an isolated rule change, but a key component of a government-wide broader strategy to upgrade internal financial controls across all public sector institutions, reduce opportunities for financial mismanagement and corruption, and improve the overall quality of public financial governance in the country.

  • Landowners Call Out Government After Indian Creek Chaos

    Landowners Call Out Government After Indian Creek Chaos

    In the wake of the safe return of Indian Creek Alcalde Marcos Canti, a prominent Belizean landowners’ organization is turning its focus from relief to accountability, placing firm blame on both the national government and several activist groups for the chaos that unfolded during Canti’s disappearance.

    Toledo Private and Lease Landowners Limited (TPLL) laid out its scathing assessment in an official public statement released on April 15, 2026, outlining a cascade of failures that turned a local incident into a volatile regional crisis. The group confirmed that while the community is relieved Canti has returned unharmed, the disorder that spread during his disappearance has exposed deep-rooted problems that cannot be ignored. According to TPLL, unregulated misinformation, widespread fear-mongering, and targeted intimidation campaigns spiraled out of control during the incident, creating unnecessary tension that put multiple community leaders at risk.

    The organization issued a strong condemnation of the threats and harassment directed at Canti, his immediate family, the village’s second alcalde, and other local community representatives. Beyond threats to community leaders, TPLL also sharply criticized the Belizean Police Service’s initial response to the disappearance. The group revealed that local police units based in Punta Gorda were severely under-resourced, lacking both sufficient personnel and operational vehicles to respond to the unfolding emergency. This gap forced regional police commanders to launch a frantic scramble to deploy backup officers from neighboring districts, delaying critical response efforts.

    TPLL did not limit its criticism to state authorities. The group also called out several prominent local organizations—including the Toledo Alcalde Association, Maya Leaders Alliance, and Julian Cho Society—accusing individuals tied to these groups of exploiting the incident to stoke public panic. Through media interviews and posts on social media platforms, TPLL claims these actors inflamed existing community tensions, turning an already volatile situation far worse. Beyond the local harm, the landowners’ group argues that these actions have caused lasting damage to Belize’s reputation on the international stage.

    At the core of TPLL’s statement is a direct rebuke of the Government of Belize’s handling of long-running land disputes in the region. The organization argues that ongoing conflicts between Maya land rights claims and private property interests persist specifically because the state has failed to fully implement the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) Consent Order, a landmark legal agreement meant to resolve these tensions. While TPLL called out activist groups for their role in the recent chaos, it stressed that ultimate responsibility for unresolved land disputes rests with the national government, not non-governmental organizations.

    In closing, TPLL issued an urgent call to Belize’s national leaders: move quickly to restore lasting calm to the southern region, uphold the principles of the rule of law, and take decisive action to address gaps in land policy before simmering tensions erupt into another full-blown crisis.

  • Indian Creek’s Deputy Alcalde Points to Leadership Breakdown

    Indian Creek’s Deputy Alcalde Points to Leadership Breakdown

    Dated April 15, 2026, deep internal divisions within the leadership of Indian Creek Village have come to light, with top local officials pointing to a complete breakdown in collaborative governance as the root of community unrest.

    In an on-the-record interview, Deputy Alcalde Manuel Ack laid bare the power struggle that has paralyzed local decision-making and stoked social friction. Ack emphasized that he remains fully aligned with the village council, which has delivered tangible progress for residents in recent months—including upgrades to critical infrastructure such as drainage culverts, local streets, community burial grounds, school yards, and a public football field. These development projects, he noted, reflect the council’s commitment to improving quality of life across the village.

    But Ack argued that this forward momentum has been undermined by the First Alcalde, who has refused to coordinate with the elected council and his deputy since taking office. From the start of the current term, Ack said, the top local leader made clear he rejected the council’s development agenda and insisted on holding unilateral control over all village affairs.

    This refusal to compromise has created a crippling political stalemate that has split the community along factional lines, even as leaders and residents breathed a collective sigh of relief over the safe recovery of Marcus Canti, a local figure at the center of recent tensions. Ack warned that this temporary relief will not resolve underlying rifts. Without a shift toward open cooperation and a willingness to compromise from all sides, he cautioned, community tensions will only escalate in the coming weeks and months.

    The current unrest comes alongside an ongoing official investigation tied to a submitted audio recording that has become a key piece of evidence in the case. Former village councilor Santiago Pop is calling on law enforcement and regulatory authorities to conduct a full, transparent probe into the recording, including rigorous verification of its authenticity. Pop raised pointed questions about the credibility of the evidence, noting that while Canti has been found unharmed, the recording has already been used to level accusations against local leaders including himself. He argued that a full investigation is critical to clearing up ambiguities and ensuring justice for all parties involved.

    Meanwhile, Domingo Choc, chairman of the Indian Creek Village Council, has issued a public appeal for calm across the community. Choc stressed that as council chair, he has consistently discouraged any acts of violence or retaliation, and has urged all council members to pursue constructive, positive solutions to the current impasse. He flatly denied any involvement by himself or his family in any actions that would undermine community peace or damage the reputations of other residents. Choc reiterated that the council’s core priorities remain advancing inclusive development and restoring unity across Indian Creek, calling on all community factions to set aside their differences and work together toward shared goals.

    Local media outlet News Five has confirmed it will continue providing ongoing coverage of the investigation and evolving political situation in the village as new details emerge.

  • Immigration Officer Lawyers Up After Administrative Leave

    Immigration Officer Lawyers Up After Administrative Leave

    A simmering internal conflict within Belize’s Immigration Department is on track to become a high-stakes legal battle, after an immigration officer placed on administrative leave over alleged participation in a coordinated border sickout has retained legal counsel to challenge the government’s disciplinary process. Last week, a coordinated work stoppage dubbed a “sickout” at the country’s western border disrupted border operations, prompting government officials to launch disciplinary action against eight officers suspected of organizing the protest under the guise of simultaneous medical leave. All eight officers have been placed on administrative leave pending an internal investigation into claims they intentionally sabotaged border operations to stage a protest. But for one of those officers, the government’s pre-emptive action has sparked a fierce legal pushback.

    Norman Rodriguez, the attorney representing immigration officer Anne Marie Smith, argues that his client is being unfairly targeted before any formal investigation has been completed. Rodriguez told reporters that Smith was already on approved, doctor-ordered medical leave from March 30 to April 1 for a longstanding chronic health condition, and submitted an official medical certificate to her port commander before her leave began. Smith returned to work as scheduled after her leave ended, only to be served with two formal disciplinary notices. The first, issued under Section 144 of the Republic Service Regulations, placed her on administrative leave over allegations of professional misconduct and breach of personal integrity. The second, dated April 7, formally notified her that she would face an official investigation into the same claims.

    The core of the government’s allegation against the eight officers rests on the timing of their leave: all eight submitted medical certificates for roughly the same window, and all returned to work around the same date, leading officials to conclude the overlapping leave was a coordinated attempt to disrupt western border operations. Rodriguez, however, says the government’s narrative falls apart under scrutiny, emphasizing that Smith’s leave was entirely legitimate and supported by verifiable medical documentation that confirms her illness was not fabricated as a cover for protest activity.

    “Before you level an accusation of sabotage against a public servant, you are obligated to conduct a full, fair investigation first, not impose punitive action before any facts have been verified,” Rodriguez said, noting that disciplinary action was initiated before the probe even began. While Smith and the other seven officers have been allowed to return to their posts during the ongoing investigation, their names remain tied to the sabotage allegations, damage that cannot be undone even if the investigation ultimately clears them, he added.

    When pressed on claims that Smith exploited her pre-existing health condition to participate in coordinated strike action alongside the seven other officers, Rodriguez dismissed the argument as flimsy and legally untenable. He confirmed that the Public Service Union has offered support to the officers, but said Smith is prepared to take her case to court to clear her name if the internal grievance process does not resolve the issue fairly. If the dispute proceeds to litigation, the government’s entire disciplinary process will face formal judicial review, and Smith will seek monetary damages for the reputational harm she has already suffered, Rodriguez explained.

    The outcome of this legal challenge carries broad implications for public servants across Belize, setting a potential precedent for how disciplinary actions against government employees are conducted, and what recourse workers have when they believe due process has been violated.

  • CARICOM’s controversy over S-G’s appointment now centres on invitation to “Heads”

    CARICOM’s controversy over S-G’s appointment now centres on invitation to “Heads”

    A weeks-long political controversy has fractured the 15-member Caribbean Community (CARICOM), pitting regional power Trinidad and Tobago against the bloc’s leadership and Secretary-General Dr. Carla Barnett over her controversial second-term reappointment, with demands for transparency and a high-profile call for Barnett’s resignation escalating tensions. The dispute first ignited on March 26, 2026, when CARICOM Chairman and St. Kitts and Nevis Prime Minister Dr. Terrance Drew announced that a required majority of CARICOM Heads of Government had approved extending Barnett’s tenure starting in August 2026. But the conflict has since pivoted to a heated dispute over conflicting accounts of whether Barnett barred foreign ministers from attending the closed-door February 26, 2026 heads of government retreat where the reappointment was finalized.

    Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar added a new twist to the saga this Wednesday, calling out Chairman Drew’s official statement for deliberately omitting the allegation that Barnett blocked the Caribbean nation’s foreign minister from attending the retreat. Persad-Bissessar publicly shared a screenshot of a February 25, 2026 WhatsApp message from Barnett that read: “Chairman PM Drew has indicated that today will be a Heads only retreat. Notwithstanding any indication otherwise, he would like it to remain Heads only. He apologises for any inconvenience.” Barnett directed attending foreign ministers to remain for a separate Community Council meeting to advance preliminary work on agenda items that would later be sent to heads for final approval.

    In an April 9, 2026 letter to Chairman Drew, Trinidad and Tobago’s Foreign and CARICOM Affairs Minister Sean Sobers, who led his country’s delegation in the absence of Prime Minister Persad-Bissessar, wrote that he interpreted the message as an uninvitation to the heads-only retreat. Sobers added that Trinidad and Tobago’s CARICOM director contacted CARICOM Chef de Cabinet Janice Miller, who confirmed the authenticity of Barnett’s WhatsApp instruction. He also noted that Community Council Chairman Dr. Denzil, St. Kitts and Nevis’ foreign minister, had explicitly told the council the February 26 event was restricted to sitting heads of government.

    A senior anonymous CARICOM official pushed back on this account to Demerara Waves Online News, denying that Sobers was ever disinvited. The official clarified that when a head of government cannot attend a retreat, the serving foreign minister serves as head of delegation — not a head of government — and argued that a seasoned lawyer and foreign minister like Sobers should have understood the regional bloc’s standard diplomatic protocols. The official accused Sobers of intentionally misleading the public to fuel controversy.

    In an April 12, 2024 statement, Chairman Drew released evidence of a second unpublicized WhatsApp message sent by Barnett to him at 10:55 p.m. on February 25, hours after the first message. That message read: “Chairman. TT Foreign Minister Sobers called me to ask if he should come to retreat in the absence of his PM. I indicated that other Heads who have left may be represented by their FMs. He also indicated he gets seasick, so he’s not looking forward to the boat ride. So we may not have TT represented tomorrow.” The CARICOM source explained that both messages must be read together: the first restriction only applied to foreign ministers whose heads of government were already in attendance at the retreat.

    CARICOM’s official photo release from the retreat shows 10 heads of government from full independent CARICOM member states in attendance, alongside non-voting representatives from British dependent associate member territories. Full members Antigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Haiti, Montserrat, and Trinidad and Tobago were absent from the official gathering.

    Persad-Bissessar has demanded full documentary evidence from Chairman Drew to confirm the legitimacy of Barnett’s reappointment, including meeting agendas, full attendee lists, official minutes from the February 26 retreat, all performance appraisals for the incumbent secretary-general, all formal communications calling for secretary-general nominee submissions, proof that all member states and their authorized representatives received proper invitations, clarification of why the heads-only restriction was omitted from the March 2, 2026 summary of confirmed decisions, and official documentation proving the reappointment vote was properly circulated by the chairman or the CARICOM Secretariat.

    “Surely there must be timestamped minutes, performance appraisals etc. Even village councils and sports clubs document their meetings far less an organization over half a century old,” Persad-Bissessar said, adding that she has yet to receive any of the requested materials.

    Trinidad and Tobago has taken drastic action over the stalled transparency request: both Persad-Bissessar and Sobers have refused to participate in future CARICOM meetings until the documents are released, and the nation boycotted a recent virtual CARICOM summit last week. A senior CARICOM source has argued that the dispute should be resolved during an in-person summit, not via back-and-forth correspondence, a position Trinidad and Tobago has rejected.

    Drew has defended the reappointment process, noting that the decision was taken under the retreat’s “financing and governance of the community” agenda item, in full compliance with Article 24 of the Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas. He also said that prior to the public announcement, officials attempted to contact all absent heads to share the outcome, but multiple attempts to reach Persad-Bissessar via email and phone failed. Ultimately, Chairman Drew spoke directly to Sobers about the decision, though he has not shared details of that private discussion.

    Persad-Bissessar has lashed out at what she calls a culture of cronyism at the CARICOM Secretariat, accusing officials of hiring political allies, party affiliates, and family members of regional politicians to maintain an “old boys club order.” She vowed to continue public pressure for accountability until the full truth is revealed and institutional reforms are implemented. “Therefore this matter will continue to be ruthlessly and relentlessly publicly escalated and prosecuted until persons are held accountable for their odious actions and proper reforms are made to the organization to ensure fairness, accountability, effective management and non interference in the domestic politics of CARICOM members,” she said Wednesday.

    The growing rift has led to outside calls for Barnett to step down. Earlier this week, Antigua and Barbuda’s veteran ambassador to the United States and Organization of American States, Sir Ronald Sanders, publicly urged the secretary-general to resign on principle to avoid derailing Caribbean regional integration. Speaking to state-owned ABS Television, Sanders argued: “If I were the Secretary General of CARICOM and I’m being quite serious here and this had occurred I would have resigned and I would have resigned because I would have said I must not stand in the way of Caribbean integration and the movement forward. It is clear that one senior government and Prime Minister is not in favour of Barnett’s appointment and as a result she should consider stepping down. Why am I still there? Because it is clear that I will never enjoy her support and why therefore would I put myself in a situation in which I am now the cause of the rift. If I were Carla Barnett, I would resign now on principle because [Persad-Bissessar] will not attend the meeting if Carla Barnett is at that meeting, neither will her foreign minister.”

  • Convicted BDF Soldier, Police Officer Move to Appeal Prison Sentences

    Convicted BDF Soldier, Police Officer Move to Appeal Prison Sentences

    Five years after the controversial 2021 fatal shooting of Belize Defense Force (BDF) soldier Jessie Escobar in Santa Familia, two convicted law enforcement officials implicated in a cover-up of the incident have launched a bid to reduce their prison sentences.

    BDF Private Ramon Alberto Alcoser and Police Corporal Juan Carlos Morales appeared before High Court Justice Derick Sylvester on April 15, 2026, where the judge scheduled their full appeal hearing for April 27. Up until the hearing convenes, both men will remain in custody at Belize Central Prison.

    The pair were originally convicted and sentenced last December by a magistrate court, after findings that they deliberately falsified information and omitted critical details from their official statements regarding Escobar’s killing. Their accounts of the shooting were ultimately disproven by independent surveillance footage that directly contradicted their testimony. Under the original sentencing order, Alcoser is currently serving a 14-month prison term, while Morales is serving a 23-month sentence.

    During the April 15 procedural hearing, Morales notified the court that he will be represented by private defense attorney Alifah Elrington for the appeal, while the court has appointed attorney Oscar Selgado to serve as Alcoser’s legal counsel. Notably, Director of Public Prosecutions Cheryl-Lynn Vidal will personally lead the prosecution’s argument in the appeal, a move that underscores the high priority and significance the prosecution assigns to this high-profile case.

    The appeal puts the original conviction and sentencing in the hands of the High Court, which will now rule on whether the original prison terms will be upheld, or if the two convicted law enforcement officers will receive a reduction of their sentences. The case has remained a focal point of public attention across Belize since Escobar’s killing in 2021, with observers across the country closely tracking every development in the legal process.