分类: politics

  • Simons en Mitchell zien kansen voor nauwere samenwerking binnen Caricom

    Simons en Mitchell zien kansen voor nauwere samenwerking binnen Caricom

    On the sidelines of the 6th annual Suriname Energy, Oil & Gas Summit and Exhibition (SEOGS), top leaders of Suriname and Grenada have held high-level talks focused on expanding bilateral and regional collaboration across multiple priority sectors, laying new groundwork for strengthened ties within the Caribbean Community (Caricom).

    Suriname’s President Jennifer Simons hosted Grenada’s Prime Minister Dickon Mitchell for the closed-door meeting at the Surinamese presidential palace on Tuesday, during the energy conference that has drawn regional and global industry and government leaders this year. This meeting marked Mitchell’s first participation in a major regional energy-focused conference, after he accepted a personal invitation from Simons to attend the 2026 SEOGS.

    In statements released by Suriname’s Communication Service following the meeting, President Simons emphasized the fundamental value of robust bilateral partnerships among Caricom member states as small island and developing Caribbean nations navigate shifting global economic conditions and shared cross-border challenges. “As nations working to unlock new economic opportunities while confronting pressing global challenges, it is essential that we continue exchanging expertise and exploring pathways for closer collaboration, particularly in energy development, sustainable growth, climate resilience, and economic diversification,” Simons said. She added that Mitchell’s attendance at the 2026 SEOGS created an ideal opportunity to deepen bilateral relations and advance aligned policy goals shared by the two countries.

    For his part, Prime Minister Mitchell commended Suriname’s approach to developing its emergent oil and gas sector, noting that the South American Caribbean nation has emerged as a responsible model for resource development. “We look to Suriname as an example of a country that pursues oil and gas exploration in a responsible manner while advancing the core economic interests of its people,” Mitchell said. Like Suriname, Grenada is currently working to develop its own domestic oil and gas industry, making knowledge-sharing and collaboration in this sector a top talking point for the bilateral meeting.

    Beyond energy development, the two leaders covered a wide range of shared regional priorities, including renewable energy expansion, food security, improved regional connectivity, and the growing impacts of climate change. Mitchell noted that these cross-cutting issues form a strong foundation for deeper collective action across all Caricom member states. He also highlighted that small island developing states (SIDS) like Grenada remain disproportionately vulnerable to climate change, and require increased international financial support to build resilience and recover from climate-linked disasters.

    The Grenadian prime minister also extended praise for Suriname’s longstanding environmental leadership, noting the country has maintained its status as one of the world’s few carbon-negative nations through the conservation of its vast tropical forest landscapes. Both leaders reaffirmed their commitment to continued high-level engagement to advance collaborative projects that deliver mutual benefit and support shared regional development goals within Caricom.

  • Setting the record straight – a response to falsehoods

    Setting the record straight – a response to falsehoods

    In response to widespread public speculation and misleading media reports surrounding her appointment and impending departure from the top role at the St. Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG) Tourism Authority, former chief executive Annette Mark has stepped forward to set the record straight, pushing back against unfounded rumors and detailing her years of results-driven public service to the country.

    Mark notes that she rarely engages with public commentary about her professional work, but recent inaccurate claims about her hiring process left her with no choice but to provide clarity for the SVG public. Addressing widespread claims that she was improperly “handpicked” for the CEO role by political actors, Mark confirms that she competed for the position alongside other candidates through a formal recruitment process led by a local SVG firm, contradicting rumors that a foreign recruitment firm led the process. The interview panel, she explains, was composed primarily of local stakeholders, with just one consultant brought in from Barbados. After the initial January interview round, Mark did not receive any update for six months until she was contacted in July about the role, and she had no insight into internal deliberations during that waiting period. At the time of the offer, she was already preparing to leave SVG to pursue professional opportunities abroad, but turned that down to serve her home country, driven by her belief in the untapped potential of SVG’s tourism sector.

    Mark outlines the timeline of her resignation, confirming she formally submitted her resignation on December 29, 2025, with an original effective date of February 28, 2026. Following the swearing-in of the new administration after the recent change in government, Mark met with the new Minister of Tourism roughly one week into his tenure. The meeting was described as cordial and professional, with Mark delivering a full briefing on the Tourism Authority’s ongoing operations, strategic priorities, and ongoing challenges.

    During that meeting, the pair discussed Mark’s pre-planned exit strategy: she had always intended to step down by August 2026. They also explored a potential arrangement where she would remain in the role longer to support a smooth leadership transition while the government sourced a permanent replacement. The minister stated the plan was practically sound, pending approval from his Cabinet colleagues, and asked Mark to formally withdraw her resignation. Mark, who had anticipated the request, already had a withdrawal letter prepared and submitted it during the meeting. Mark emphasizes that the minister explicitly stated during this conversation that he had no objections to her continuing in the role, and that he did not consider an individual’s political party affiliation a relevant factor for the position. The minister’s core expectation, Mark says, was that public office holders deliver professional, effective performance, a statement that led Mark to believe any future decision about her tenure would be based on professional rather than political considerations.

    Before the Cabinet could issue a formal response, Mark was on scheduled vacation leave from December 22, 2025, to January 6, 2026. During this break, she reflected on her long-term plans, and ultimately sent a second letter to the minister on or around December 30, 2025, requesting that she be allowed to remain on vacation until her original February 28 resignation effective date. She committed to remaining available to support a full, organized handover of responsibilities, and during this period, she continued to fulfill key professional commitments – including several requests from the minister herself – and spent significant time compiling a comprehensive handover document detailing all ongoing projects, institutional priorities, and outstanding pending matters.

    Mark stresses that her decision to issue this public clarification is not driven by personal self-interest, but by a commitment to upholding factual public discourse. She argues that public conversation about governance should be rooted in verifiable facts rather than unfounded assumptions or incomplete, politically motivated narratives, adding that holders of public office have a responsibility to uphold the truth.

    Throughout her decades of public service, Mark says she has prioritized professionalism and integrity, and has always centered what is best for SVG regardless of which political party holds office. “Public service is larger than any individual or political party,” she emphasized. What troubles her most, she says, is the growing trend of personalizing public debate to undermine the contributions of public servants who have dedicated decades of their careers to advancing the country. She raised concerns about the example this sets for young Vincentians, questioning what message it sends when public figures advance their own standing by attacking the character, motives and achievements of fellow public servants.

    Rather than engaging in petty personal attacks, Mark has chosen to let her track record of results speak for itself, a step she says she would not normally take. She details a series of landmark wins for SVG’s tourism sector during her tenure: in 2024, despite industry projections that stay-over tourist arrivals would stay below 100,000, SVG exceeded expectations to record more than 101,000 arrivals. In 2025, the country outperformed forecasts once again, hitting approximately 120,000 stay-over arrivals, ranking it among the top-performing tourism destinations in the Caribbean according to regional industry data.

    Major initiatives launched during her leadership include the Diamond Rewards Programme, an incentive scheme designed to encourage international travel advisors to prioritize SVG as a destination; the ongoing conceptualization of a digital transformation of SVG’s tourism sites to deliver more immersive, interactive experiences for visitors; the rebranding and expansion of the popular Bequia Easter Regatta into SVG Sailing Week, which positioned the country as a top regional sailing destination; the development of new plans to upgrade and expand national tourism attractions and visitor experiences; the successful hosting and expansion of the first Emancipation Cricket Festival and Masters Cricket Festival; representation of SVG at key regional and global tourism forums, including her election as Vice Chair and Director of the Caribbean Tourism Organization’s Board; targeted engagement with major international airline partners including Virgin Atlantic and Delta Air Lines to improve air access and connectivity for visitors, including a successful 2025 adjustment to Virgin Atlantic’s summer arrival time from 5:00 pm to 2:00 pm that allows for same-day connections to the outer Grenadines islands; and the creation of the Tourism Ambassador Programme, which recruits high-profile international public figures with Vincentian heritage to promote the destination, including Raja Caruth, Skinny Fabulous, Problem Child, Kevin Lyttle, and Devale and Khadeen Ellis.

    Before taking on the role of CEO at the Tourism Authority, Mark served as executive director of Invest SVG, the country’s investment promotion agency, where she led a series of transformative institutional and economic development projects. Key achievements from that tenure include leading the drafting of SVG’s proposed new Investment Act; expanding the local Everything Vincy business support programme from just 40 participants to more than 120; facilitating SVG’s six-month national participation in Expo 2020 Dubai; developing the first comprehensive five-year strategic plan in Invest SVG’s history; supporting and facilitating major foreign direct investment projects including the new Sandals, Holiday Inn, and Marriott resort developments; and serving as the elected President of the Caribbean Association of Investment Promotion Agencies from 2020 to 2022, a position she won via vote from her regional peers.

    Mark concludes by noting that she has never run for public office, and has never measured her success by public recognition. Her core focus throughout her career has always been to deliver meaningful contributions to the institutions and country she has been privileged to serve. While other actors may choose to push politically motivated narratives about her tenure, Mark says she remains proud of her track record, deeply grateful for the opportunities to serve, and confident that history will judge her contributions based on facts, results, and commitment to public service.

    In closing, Mark extended her sincere congratulations to the SVG Tourism Authority and its incoming new management, wishing them every success in their future work advancing the country’s tourism sector through hard work and dedication.

    Disclaimer: This is an opinion piece, with views belonging solely to the author, and does not necessarily represent the official editorial stance of iWitness News.

  • The “Ants Nest” That Minister Mira Stirred

    The “Ants Nest” That Minister Mira Stirred

    Nearly one month has passed since Belizean law enforcement seized two mobile phones from former United Democratic Party (UDP) chairman Alberto August during a court-authorized search of his Santa Elena residence, and the former party leader is still waiting for authorities to return his property. August is now publicly questioning the justification for holding the devices, which he maintains contain no evidence of criminal activity.

    The search operation, carried out on May 30, was initiated under a High Court warrant that granted police permission to seize electronic devices from August’s home. The operation took an unplanned turn when officers located a firearm on the property; at the time of the search, August was temporarily unable to present the required license for the weapon. This discovery shifted the entire focus of the raid: officers departed the residence with August’s two personal mobile phones and the firearm, opting to leave all other electronic equipment on-site.

    Following the seizure, August’s legal representative, Michael Peyrefitte, submitted a formal letter to the Director of Public Prosecutions calling for the immediate return of the phones. To date, no action has been taken on that request, leaving August without access to critical personal and professional data.

    Notably, August has never attempted to deny authorship of the Facebook post that sparked the entire investigation in the first place. In a recent statement, he reaffirmed his position: “I told them yes, that I made the post and I will stand by that.” This open admission, he argues, makes the continued retention of his devices entirely unnecessary.

    The prolonged absence of his phones has already caused tangible harm to August’s professional operations. All of his business contracts, digital payment systems, and financial receipts are stored on the devices, meaning every additional day the phones remain in police custody creates new losses for his work.

    Beyond the financial harm, August has raised significant constitutional concerns over a growing rumor that authorities have sought technical support from the U.S. Embassy to unlock the encrypted devices. He pointed to a separate high-profile recent investigation in which Belizean police publicly acknowledged requiring American technical assistance to bypass device security, making the prospect of external involvement in his case far from speculative.

    August pushed back hard against any implication of criminal ties, challenging authorities to produce even the smallest shred of evidence of wrongdoing. “There is absolutely nothing of a criminal nature in my phone,” he said. “If the police or the US Embassy can show me even an iota of evidence that I have been in communication with a cartel, a drug trafficker, a plane lander, human trafficking, kidnapping…then I will freely open the phone for them to examine it.”

    In a striking political turn, August argued that the entire investigation stemmed from actions by Minister Mira, and that more thorough pre-raid investigation would have prevented Mira’s current political predicament: Mira has been sidelined from the Cabinet pending the outcome of an official audit into the matter. August summed up the situation bluntly, saying “the honorable minister stirred an ants nest.”

    Despite the political upheaval, August framed the ongoing controversy as a beneficial moment for the people of Belize, calling the revelations a “blessing in disguise.” He closed with a direct appeal to the officials leading the Cabinet audit, urging them to prioritize uncovering the full truth, no matter what political fallout may follow.

  • PSU: Mira’s Leave Sends ‘Wrong Message’ to Public Officers

    PSU: Mira’s Leave Sends ‘Wrong Message’ to Public Officers

    A developing political controversy is roiling Belizean politics, centered on how the national government has managed the ongoing formal probe into procurement practices at the Ministry of Defence. At the heart of the dispute is Belmopan Area Representative Oscar Mira, who has entered a paid leave of absence as the audit gets underway — a move that the nation’s largest public sector union, the Public Service Union (PSU), has condemned as inappropriate, and criticized Prime Minister John Briceño for his handling of the situation.

    PSU President Dean Flowers has publicly pushed back against the prime minister’s response, arguing that the arrangement sets a dangerous precedent for all public servants across Belize. In his remarks on the controversy, Flowers questioned what signal the government is sending to civil servants: that when allegations of misconduct emerge and accountability is expected, officials can simply request and receive paid leave to avoid oversight. He also pushed back against Briceño’s framing of the leave as a voluntary, responsible step, noting that the prime minister should have taken decisive action to order Mira’s recusal himself rather than waiting for the sitting representative to initiate the leave process.

    For his part, Prime Minister Briceño has defended the arrangement, framing Mira’s choice to step aside as an act of good faith that deserves public praise. Speaking to reporters on Monday, Briceño explained that Mira reached out voluntarily to offer to step back from his duties to create an unimpeded path for the Auditor General to complete the procurement audit. The prime minister emphasized that Mira’s willingness to stand aside was the correct call, and it should be commended by the public.

    In the wake of Mira’s departure, the government has appointed Infrastructure Development and Housing Minister Julius Espat to serve as interim Minister of Home Affairs in addition to his existing cabinet responsibilities. Espat has adopted a wait-and-see approach to the controversy, noting that full details of the audit investigation have not yet been made public. He acknowledged that Mira has faced unrelenting public scrutiny in recent weeks, adding that the outcome of the audit and Mira’s political future remain uncertain at this early stage.

    The formal audit is projected to take roughly three months to complete its review of Defence Ministry procurement practices. In a parallel development on the same day the leave was announced, Edward Broaster, a leading figure in Belize’s opposition United Democratic Party (UDP), filed a formal corruption complaint against Mira with the country’s Integrity Commission, escalating the political pressure on the sitting People’s United Party government.

  • Who Signs Off Government Money? FinSec Breaks Down the System

    Who Signs Off Government Money? FinSec Breaks Down the System

    A formal audit into questionable procurement and payment practices at Belize’s Ministry of Defence, linked to the so-called “Mira millions” controversy, is now underway, and top financial officials have laid out the full chain of oversight for public spending to clarify how such transactions are processed. Speaking on the ongoing investigation, Financial Secretary Joseph Waight confirmed that any determination of personal liability for improper spending will wait for the independent audit process to reach its final conclusions.

    Waight walked through the standard tiered approval process for all government payments, starting with the initial data entry phase. A junior government clerk is responsible for first inputting invoice details into the national SmartStream public payment management system. From there, a senior clerk reviews the entry to confirm its accuracy before passing it along to a ministry financial officer for a second, more rigorous check. That step is designed to verify that all supporting documentation for the transaction is complete and compliant with government rules.

    The approval structure adds an extra layer of oversight for large transactions: any payment exceeding $10,000 requires a mandatory additional review and sign-off from the national Treasury before funds are disbursed. Contrary to common assumptions that political leaders sign off on every major transaction, Waight noted that minister involvement in individual payment approvals is extremely rare. The core function of reviewing tendering and procurement decisions, he explained, falls to internal committees, chief executives, designated accounting officers and dedicated financial teams, rather than political appointees.

    When pressed about the status of the financial officer who oversaw approvals during the period under investigation, Waight said the government will hold off on any disciplinary action until the full audit results are published. He did acknowledge that the Mira millions controversy has shone a light on potential gaps in existing government financial oversight, signaling that targeted regulatory and procedural reforms are likely once the probe wraps up.

    Two key reform proposals are already under discussion, Waight confirmed. The first is the creation of a centralized national procurement office, a policy initiative first proposed by Prime Minister John Briceño that would consolidate oversight of all government purchasing to reduce gaps in accountability. The second is the revival of random, unannounced spot checks of ministry financial accounts, a practice that Waight said was common in past decades but has fallen out of use. “In the old days, you used to have spot checks. Treasury used to send out surprise surveys,” Waight said. “We need to do those again.”

    Waight also addressed calls for greater public transparency around SmartStream payment records. While he agreed that taxpayers have an inherent right to know how public funds are allocated and spent, he argued that reasonable privacy protections must remain in place for private suppliers and individual partners that participate in government contracts. On the broader question of whether similar oversight gaps exist across other large government departments that manage multi-million dollar budgets, Waight said only targeted investigation can uncover potential issues. “When you stay behind your desk for too long, you get a little detached from what is happening out there,” he said. “But it requires interrogation to find out. I don’t know if it’s going on in the rest of the government. Big ministries spend big money.”

  • Verkaveling FAI gaat niet door

    Verkaveling FAI gaat niet door

    In a key address during parliamentary budget deliberations in Suriname’s National Assembly, Minister of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries Mike Noersalim has formally confirmed the cancellation of the long-debated planned land partitioning of the former FAI Foundation’s property, bringing long-awaited clarity to a controversial land use issue that has drawn public attention in recent months.

    Noersalim stressed that the current administration’s policy on agricultural land is unambiguous: all land zoned for agricultural use must remain dedicated exclusively to agricultural purposes. He made clear that his ministry will not approve or participate in any plan to subdivide existing agricultural land for residential development or any other non-agricultural uses, drawing a clear line to protect Suriname’s critical agricultural resources.

    The minister also referenced that President Chan Santokhi has previously ordered a comprehensive review of all existing agricultural land holdings across the country, a review being carried out in close collaboration between Noersalim’s ministry and the Ministry of Land Policy and Forest Management.

    Expanding on the government’s broader land use strategy, Noersalim emphasized that Suriname’s development priority must focus on improving productivity on existing agricultural lands rather than clearing undisturbed primary forest for new development, aligning the country’s agricultural policy with global conservation commitments. He also outright denied circulating rumors of a secret land cooperation agreement between the government and a Mennonite community, stating that no such deal — either direct or indirect — has ever been finalized.

    Turning to the specific situation of the former FAI Foundation, Noersalim explained that a restructuring and diversification process for the entity was launched years ago in response to the foundation’s severe debt crisis. The organization currently carries a total debt burden exceeding $20 million, according to government data. Instead of moving forward with partitioning the land for non-agricultural use, the administration is now exploring alternative agricultural development models for the property, including shifting cultivation to high-value commercial crops such as cacao and passion fruit, and developing local agricultural product processing infrastructure.

    In closing, Noersalim framed the policy shift as part of a broader overhaul of Suriname’s agricultural sector. He noted that the country’s agricultural strategy can no longer focus solely on exporting raw commodities; instead, Suriname aims to build a complete domestic agricultural value chain that includes local processing and value addition before export, to create more jobs and capture greater economic benefit from the country’s natural resources.

  • “Nobody Has said That There is Fraud Yet…But It Looks Suspicious”

    “Nobody Has said That There is Fraud Yet…But It Looks Suspicious”

    A growing public controversy over potential government procurement misconduct has emerged in Belize, after the nation’s top financial official acknowledged that questionable payments to firms linked to a sitting cabinet minister’s family should have triggered immediate oversight alerts. In a candid interview with local outlet News 5, Financial Secretary Joseph Waight opened up about irregularities uncovered through leaked procurement documents from the SmartStream system, confirming that the transactions in question deviate sharply from established government financial protocols.

    Waight, the country’s top civil servant for public finance management, pointed to a clear failure in the existing oversight framework. “Clearly there was a breakdown in the system. It wasn’t intended to work this way,” he told reporters, adding that the irregular pattern could stem from anything from severe negligence to deliberate collusion between parties involved in processing the payments. “Either somebody dropped the ball, fell asleep, or worse, they moved together on it.”

    At the heart of the scandal are hundreds of thousands of dollars in public funds disbursed by the Ministry of Defence to private suppliers owned by immediate and extended relatives of Minister of Defence Oscar Mira. Multiple sources familiar with the investigation confirm that nearly all of these transactions were processed for amounts just under $10,000 — the statutory threshold that requires mandatory additional review and approval from the national Treasury Department.

    When asked directly if this structured pattern of small-value transactions was a deliberate tactic to evade official Treasury oversight, Waight did not mince words. “It is possible. It looks as if there was some wilful intention there to dodge on that,” he said. While Waight acknowledged that splitting large contracts into incremental instalments is a standard and legal practice in some public procurement scenarios, he emphasized that the current batch of scrutinized transactions does not meet the criteria for legitimate instalment payments. “But not in this case,” he said. “This case looks cute to me.”

    Waight also drew attention to another anomalous practice uncovered during initial reviews: the existence of unregistered “ghost dots” in official supplier account records, a feature he described as highly unusual and unorthodox. “First time I saw that…It took a certain amount of creativity,” he noted, adding that any trained financial officer reviewing the transaction log should have immediately flagged the irregular pattern for further investigation. “It should have raised an eyebrow,” he admitted.

    Of particular note to investigators is a single day of transactions that saw more than $400,000 in total payments disbursed to the family-linked suppliers, all split into chunks below the $10,000 oversight threshold. That lumpy, concentrated pattern has deepened concerns about intentional misconduct.

    Thus far, no formal allegations of fraud have been filed, and an official audit ordered by Prime Minister John Briceño is currently underway to determine whether any existing financial regulations or national laws were broken. Waight stressed that until the audit process is complete and all evidence is compiled, he will avoid making definitive claims of wrongdoing or assigning blame to individual officials. Still, the top financial official made clear that the circumstances surrounding the payments raise serious red flags. “Nobody has said that there is fraud yet,” he said. “But it looks suspicious.”

  • Keir Starmer steps down as UK prime minister amid Labour pressure

    Keir Starmer steps down as UK prime minister amid Labour pressure

    The United Kingdom is bracing for another major political shift after sitting Prime Minister Keir Starmer confirmed his resignation, marking the country’s fifth turn over of its top leadership role in just four years.

    Media outlets across the UK report that Starmer’s exit came as no surprise, after months of simmering discontent within his own Labour Party. Though Starmer steered Labour to a clear landslide victory in the 2024 general election, grassroots and parliamentary pressure built rapidly as public approval of his government waned and criticism of his leadership style mounted.

    Queen Mary University of London politics professor Tim Bale, in comments carried by Al Jazeera, characterized Starmer as an ineffective communicator who fumbled his first months in office, and failed to articulate a unifying, inspiring vision that could energize both his parliamentary caucus and the general voting public.

    Per reporting from The Guardian, Starmer’s departure also comes amid the Labour Party’s growing struggle to counter the rising electoral influence of Reform UK, the anti-immigration populist right party headed by veteran political figure Nigel Farage. Many senior and rank-and-file Labour figures have growing concerns that Starmer lacked the strategy and profile to effectively push back against Reform UK’s expanding appeal, a worry that accelerated calls for his resignation.

    In the wake of Starmer’s announcement, all political attention has turned to Andy Burnham, the widely tipped frontrunner to replace him as Labour leader and UK Prime Minister. The 56-year-old is a seasoned Labour veteran who held cabinet positions under former prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, and has served as the popular Mayor of Greater Manchester since 2017. This is not Burnham’s first run at the Labour leadership: he unsuccessfully contested the role in both 2010 and 2015.

    Burnham’s position as the clear frontrunner has been bolstered by his strong recent performance in the Makerfield constituency, where he helped Labour claw back substantial voter support even as Reform UK made major gains across other seats during May’s local elections.

    In line with longstanding UK constitutional convention, Starmer formally notified King Charles III of his plan to step down before making his public announcement on Monday morning. The Guardian also confirmed that Starmer has already held a meeting with the presumptive incoming leader to coordinate preparations for a smooth transition of power.

    Barring any last-minute challengers entering the race, Burnham is on track to be confirmed as the new leader of the Labour Party and the next Prime Minister of the United Kingdom between July 17 and 18.

  • Op zoek naar de narrow corridor

    Op zoek naar de narrow corridor

    The 2026 debut issue of the *Surinaams Juristenblad* (Surinamese Law Journal) has featured a deeply insightful new conversation piece between author and interviewer Maurice Adams and veteran Surinamese legal scholar, educator and public figure Hans Lim A Po, probing decades of political and institutional evolution in the South American nation. The conversation, which has been compiled into a 44-page publication titled *In Search of the Narrow Corridor: Conversations with Hans Lim A Po on State, Law and Democracy in Suriname*, doubles as a concise biography of Lim A Po, one of Suriname’s most influential legal and public minds.

    After completing his academic studies at Leiden University in the Netherlands, Lim A Po returned to his home country to build a decades-long public career, working first as an attorney and lecturer at what was then the University of Suriname, now renamed the Anton de Kom University of Suriname. Following his retirement from legal practice, he joined the senior leadership of global multinational Billiton, while continuing to contribute to key national policy debates: he played a central role in addressing border disputes with Guyana, advancing Indigenous and local land rights reform, updating Suriname’s electoral regulations, and establishing the nation’s Social-Economic Council (SER). He later founded the FHR Institute, with a core mission to expand access to high-quality higher education in Suriname and curb the ongoing crisis of brain drain from the country.

    Throughout the conversation, Lim A Po outlines his long-held vision for national progress, arguing that intentional, vision-driven “development by design” rooted in forward-looking policy is the only path to shared prosperity. He identifies broad public trust in state institutions and civil society as a foundational requirement for a free and thriving nation, while warning that Suriname’s traditional reliance on extractive industries is unsustainable long-term, urging policymakers to adopt proactive scenario planning to prepare for a post-extractive economic future. His lifelong work, he emphasizes, has been centered on lifting standards for governance, education and the rule of law across Suriname.

    Turning to the history of Suriname’s path to independence, Lim A Po reflects on the country’s pre-independence relationship with the Netherlands, noting that the now-defunct Statute of the Kingdom of the Netherlands starkly illustrated the unequal power dynamic between the two nations: even after the Statute entered into force, Dutch dominance over Suriname’s affairs remained largely intact, a dynamic Lim A Po characterizes as a persistent “culture of dependency.” By 1955, he notes, a distinct Surinamese political and social elite, most educated in the Netherlands, had begun to emerge, setting the stage for eventual self-rule.

    While Lim A Po argues that full independence was ultimately inevitable for Suriname, he contends that it came prematurely. He observes that while democratic institution-building and state formation are complementary long-term goals, they often work against one another in the short term – a tension that Suriname has experienced firsthand. He also challenges the prevailing narrative that independence was driven largely by domestic political pressure, noting that the process was heavily negotiated and largely directed by the Dutch government.

    The jurist stresses that trust and reciprocity are non-negotiable building blocks for sustainable democratic development, and that a persistent deficit of both across Suriname’s politics and society remains one of the nation’s greatest unresolved challenges. In his view, the sustained collective progress needed to build a robust constitutional, administrative and civil society framework never fully materialized after independence. He traces the roots of the 1980 military coup in part to the collapse of the country’s earlier “broederpolitiek” (reconciliation politics), which had maintained temporary stability before unraveling. On the topic of ethnic divisions, he offers a measured optimistic outlook, arguing that tensions are likely to fade gradually over time.

    One of the publication’s most surprising revelations centers on the drafting of Suriname’s 1975 constitution: according to Lim A Po, the entire process was overseen by Dutch authorities, led by Professor David Simons and a team of junior Dutch legal scholars. The text also shares little-known details of Lim A Po’s own experience under military rule: he was arrested three times by the military, all in connection with his work on the National Border Commission, and released after one day in custody each time. When asked if he feared arrest during the December 1980 military crackdown, he says he remains uncertain whether he was ever a specific target.

    Drawing on his expertise in legal philosophy, Lim A Po frames the relationship between the state and civil society through what he calls the “narrow corridor” framework: a balanced space where both state institutions and societal actors hold appropriate power. He summarizes this core idea in clear terms: formal institutions alone are not enough to sustain freedom. Written constitutional guarantees of democracy cannot function without a civil society willing to defend its rights, paired with a state strong enough to uphold those rights consistently. Freedom, he argues, is not a static end goal but a dynamic process that every new generation must actively work to protect and preserve within the narrow corridor of balance between state and society.

    When Adams asks if he believes he has helped illuminate the challenges of this narrow corridor for Suriname, Lim A Po responds that he hopes at minimum to have spread the understanding that high standards of governance and rule of law are non-negotiable for the nation’s future progress. In the closing journal commentary, reviewer Carlo Jadnanansing endorses that hope, noting that it is already validated by the decades of transformative contributions Lim A Po has made to Surinamese society, through the FHR Institute and his many decades of public and institutional service.

  • High Court Dismisses ONDCP Bid to Forfeit EC$172,000 Seized From Bodybuilder

    High Court Dismisses ONDCP Bid to Forfeit EC$172,000 Seized From Bodybuilder

    In a landmark ruling delivered on June 16, High Court Justice Rene Williams has dealt a major blow to the Office of National Drug and Money Laundering Control Policy (ONDCP), dismissing its bid to permanently forfeit more than EC$172,700 seized from local bodybuilder Kenroy Christian. The judge’s decision centered on the agency’s fundamental failure to meet its legal burden by producing admissible evidence to back up its claims that the seized funds were tied to criminal activity.

    The case stretches back nearly four years, when ONDCP officials first seized the sum of EC$172,736.65 from Christian. Following the seizure, the agency launched formal proceedings to request that the funds be permanently forfeited to the state, a standard process under the country’s anti-money laundering regulatory framework. But from the earliest stages of litigation, the case was plagued by procedural missteps on the part of the ONDCP.

    Justice Williams’ ruling highlighted that the agency repeatedly failed to comply with binding case management orders that required it to file formal witness statements and disclose all evidence to the defense ahead of the scheduled trial. By the time the case reached its final hearing, the ONDCP had no admissible witness testimony or documentary evidence to present before the court to support its core allegation: that the seized funds were either proceeds of criminal conduct or intended to be used for unlawful purposes, as required to grant a forfeiture order under anti-money laundering legislation.

    In her written judgment, Justice Williams emphasized that courts cannot base rulings on unproven assertions included in legal pleadings or attorney arguments alone. Under the law, the onus remains squarely on the state agency seeking forfeiture to prove its case through credible, properly presented evidence. Without any such evidence on the record, the judge found that the ONDCP had fallen far short of meeting the required legal standard to justify permanent confiscation. The dismissal of the application means the seized funds will now be returned to Christian, bringing a close to a four-year legal battle that exposed significant procedural gaps in the ONDCP’s case handling.