分类: politics

  • Young Jamaicans encouraged to engage in policy discussions and to drive innovation

    Young Jamaicans encouraged to engage in policy discussions and to drive innovation

    MONTEGO BAY, St James – Against the backdrop of the 11th Biennial Jamaica Diaspora Conference, a senior government official has made a forceful case for centering young Jamaicans – both domestic residents and members of the global diaspora – in the island nation’s policy development and growth agendas. Speaking at the opening commencement session held at the Montego Bay Convention Centre on the event’s opening day, Alando Terrelonge, Minister of State in Jamaica’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade, laid out a clear vision for expanded youth participation in shaping the country’s future.

    Terrelonge opened his remarks by celebrating the strong representation of young professionals, students, and emerging leaders in attendance at the four-day gathering, which runs from June 15 to 18 under the overarching theme “Diaspora Partnerships: Rebuilding a More Climate-Resilient Jamaica”. He referred to these young attendees as Jamaica’s “young kings and queens”, stressing that their active involvement in national efforts is non-negotiable for meaningful progress.

    The state minister emphasized that young people bring unique, irreplaceable value to national problem-solving: they carry the creative drive, relentless energy, and unfiltered fresh perspectives required to tackle not only Jamaica’s most urgent domestic challenges, but also pressing shared issues facing the global community. “The future we seek to build belongs to you,” Terrelonge told the young audience. “It belongs to your ideas, your creativity, and energy, which are indispensable to that effort.”

    Against the backdrop of an increasingly interconnected and complex global landscape, Terrelonge argued that young Jamaicans must be intentionally empowered to contribute across four critical pillars: policy design, entrepreneurial innovation, technological advancement, and sustainable development initiatives. To unlock this potential, he said, the government and broader stakeholders must consistently build intentional pathways that open doors for youth, regardless of whether they live on the island or abroad as part of the diaspora.

    Crucially, Terrelonge pushed beyond the common practice of token youth consultation, noting that genuine engagement requires far more than just hearing young voices. Young people must be integrated directly into decision-making processes, he insisted, so their input directly shapes the policies and initiatives that will define Jamaica’s long-term trajectory. “Your voices must not only be heard but actively incorporated into the decisions that shape our future,” he said.

    Terrelonge highlighted the biennial diaspora conference itself as a model of the kind of opportunity that should be expanded for young leaders. The event brings together hundreds of stakeholders, including diaspora members, government policymakers, private sector leaders, global development practitioners, and innovators, creating space for cross-community dialogue that would not otherwise happen. This exposure to a wide range of diverse perspectives and lived experiences, he explained, helps young people build the skills, connections, and professional networks they need to drive impact at both the national and global level.

    He urged all attendees – especially young participants – to make the most of the conference’s full slate of programming, including plenary discussions, skills-focused workshops, and structured networking sessions. Meaningful, long-lasting partnerships that drive real change often grow out of intentional dialogue and collaborative problem-solving, he noted, and the conference is designed to foster exactly those kinds of connections.

    In closing, Terrelonge framed youth empowerment as a foundational priority for Jamaica’s long-term success. Investing in the next generation of leaders, he argued, is the only way to guarantee that Jamaica remains resilient in the face of emerging challenges, competitive in the global economy, and innovative in its approach to national development.

    Hosted this year in St James, the 11th iteration of the conference brings together a diverse cohort of stakeholders united around two core goals: advancing inclusive national development and strengthening Jamaica’s capacity to adapt to and withstand the impacts of climate change. The gathering provides a dedicated space to co-design actionable solutions that leverage the resources, expertise, and connections of the global Jamaican diaspora to support progress on the island.

  • Haitian group welcomes US immigrant rights protection task force

    Haitian group welcomes US immigrant rights protection task force

    In a bold rebuke of harsh federal immigration policies, Maryland Governor Wes Moore has signed an executive order launching the Maryland Immigrant Rights Protection Task Force, a move that has earned widespread praise from immigrant advocacy organizations across the country.

    Based in California, the Haitian Bridge Alliance (HBA), a leading group focused on defending the rights of Haitian and Caribbean immigrant communities, has lauded Moore’s action as a critical stand for justice at a moment when immigrant populations across the United States face growing hostility from the Trump administration.

    The 12-month interagency task force will bring together multiple state bodies, including the Maryland Attorney General’s office, to coordinate cross-system efforts to shield immigrant residents from widespread harm, including fraud, economic exploitation, and systemic discrimination. Speaking to the Caribbean Media Corporation (CMC) from San Diego, HBA Executive Director Guerline Jozef emphasized that the new initiative arrives at an urgent turning point for vulnerable immigrant communities.

    “Across the nation, immigrant groups are facing increasingly sophisticated scams engineered by bad actors who exploit their fear of deportation, on top of the Trump administration’s draconian, racist policies that target and persecute immigrant communities,” Jozef explained. “This task force is both a protection for our communities and a direct response to these harmful actions. Over the next year, its core work will focus on strengthening existing safeguards and enforcing accountability for those who harm immigrants.”

    Jozef commended Moore for taking decisive, proactive action to protect immigrant families, noting that the executive order sends an unmissable message: all people residing in Maryland, regardless of immigration status, deserve dignity, safety, and equal protection under the law. “By proactively addressing the unique challenges immigrant communities face and holding bad actors accountable, Maryland is showing the country what courageous, principled leadership looks like,” she added. She also reaffirmed HBA’s longstanding commitment to partnering with policymakers, community organizers, and local leaders across the U.S. to advance policies that protect the rights and well-being of all immigrants.

    For his part, Governor Moore highlighted the massive, underrecognized contributions that immigrants make to Maryland when he signed the order. Immigrants make up roughly 17% of the state’s total population and account for nearly 22% of Maryland’s entire labor force, meaning they are a core pillar of the state’s economic and social fabric.

    “Despite the enormous contributions immigrants make to our state’s economic, social, and cultural life, many immigrant Marylanders have faced systemic discrimination and substandard access to critical services for decades, from legal support to employment opportunities and housing,” Moore said. “More recently, we have seen a sharp rise in predatory new schemes that target immigrants, who are often too fearful of federal immigration enforcement to report abuse to authorities.”

    The governor stressed that this exploitative activity does not only harm immigrant families—it also undermines fair market competition, distorts local economies, and erodes public safety for all Maryland residents. “Our immigrant communities make Maryland a better, stronger state. I have been clear: we will not stand idly by while bad actors prey on members of our community,” Moore said. “By forming this task force, we are demonstrating the unity and strength of our state when we stand together against injustice.”

    The new executive order follows Moore’s pledge to address the fraud and exploitation of immigrant residents during his annual State of the State address earlier this year. This is not the first pro-immigrant action Moore has taken: earlier in 2025, he signed legislation designating schools and hospitals as “safe spaces” that are off-limits for federal civil immigration enforcement, and banned state and local governments from deputizing local law enforcement to carry out federal immigration actions. In February, Moore also publicly raised objections to the Department of Homeland Security’s plan to develop and operate an ICE detention facility near Williamsport, in a letter sent to then-DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.

    The task force will be chaired by Moore’s own Office of Immigrant Affairs, and its work will center on addressing rising exploitation, strengthening anti-discrimination protections, and coordinating state resources to better serve immigrant communities across Maryland.

  • UDC advances major development and housing plans for St Ann

    UDC advances major development and housing plans for St Ann

    KINGSTON, Jamaica — Jamaica’s Urban Development Corporation (UDC) has laid out an ambitious slate of cross-sector development projects for the parish of St Ann, spanning affordable housing, public recreational space, tourism infrastructure and community upgrades, as a core part of the national government’s push for inclusive, sustainable long-term growth across the island.

    The comprehensive development plan was formally presented during a high-level stakeholder meeting held June 10 at the UDC’s downtown Kingston headquarters, with Prime Minister Dr. Andrew Holness, the permanent secretary of the Ministry of Economic Growth and Infrastructure Development, UDC leadership including Chairman Norman Brown and General Manager Bobby Honeyghan, and other key partners in attendance.

    During the meeting, Honeyghan detailed the slate of place-focused projects set to transform the popular resort town of Ocho Rios and its surrounding St Ann communities. Upgrades are already underway at high-traffic public and tourist destinations including Ocho Rios Bay Beach and Waterfront, Turtle River Park and Shaw Park, while a major new 9-acre development is proposed for central Ocho Rios. Iconic national tourist sites will also see full redevelopments, including the world-famous Dunn’s River Falls and Park, Belmont Cove (locally known as Little Dunn’s River) and Laughing Waters.

    Beyond tourism and public space improvements, the UDC is advancing a large-scale affordable housing program across St Ann, with three new developments planned at Mansfield, Chalky Hill and Malvern Park. Honeyghan confirmed that the three sites will deliver between 1,500 and 2,000 new housing units, a contribution designed to ease the country’s persistent unmet demand for accessible housing.

    Prime Minister Holness praised the UDC’s progress and emphasized that the agency plays a critical underrecognized role in advancing the government’s national housing agenda. “Many Jamaicans don’t realize that our national housing policy isn’t delivered only through the National Housing Trust and the Housing Agency of Jamaica,” Holness noted. “We are receiving substantial support from the UDC through projects spread across every region of the country.”

    The prime minister added that housing initiatives are already moving forward in parishes across Jamaica, including Portland, St Catherine, Caymanas, Portmore, Westmoreland and St Elizabeth, in addition to St Ann. Across all UDC-managed development portfolios, the agency is on track to deliver roughly 12,000 new housing solutions nationwide, adding significant new supply beyond the units already planned by the NHT, HAJ and the government’s New Social Housing Programme.

    UDC Chairman Norman Brown reaffirmed the agency’s commitment to ensuring all new development delivers measurable, tangible benefits for everyday Jamaicans while aligning with national long-term growth targets. “At the UDC, our mission is to create opportunity through strategic investments that expand access to affordable housing, upgrade public spaces for community use, strengthen Jamaica’s global tourism offering, and stimulate local economic activity,” Brown explained. “The projects we are advancing in St Ann embody our commitment to building communities where people can live, work and prosper, with development that remains inclusive and sustainable for generations.”

    Wednesday’s meeting forms part of the Jamaican government’s ongoing work to accelerate national economic growth, expand housing supply, improve public amenities, and unlock new development opportunities across all parishes. As the UDC continues to advance its project pipeline island-wide, the agency remains focused on delivering developments that attract private investment, create local jobs, strengthen communities, and raise the overall quality of life for Jamaican residents. The St Ann initiative marks another key milestone in the UDC’s ongoing work to build dynamic, resilient, sustainable communities aligned with the country’s core national development priorities.

  • Dominican Army Chief inspects military units along southern border

    Dominican Army Chief inspects military units along southern border

    In a strategic move to reinforce national border protection, the top commander of the Dominican Republic Army, General Jorge Iván Camino Pérez, has completed a comprehensive inspection of military assets and personnel positioned along the country’s southern border. The tour covered critical military outposts, detachments, and control checkpoints spread across two border provinces, Independencia and Pedernales, with the core goal of evaluating both operational preparedness and the on-the-ground conditions for deployed troops.

    The inspection itinerary started at the Cambronal Fortress based in Neiba, which serves as the command center for Company B of the 14th Infantry Battalion. From there, General Camino Pérez traveled through a string of remote advanced positions and detachments, including sites at El Aguacate, Don Juan, Cabeza de Agua, and strategic military positions nested within the protected terrain of Sierra de Bahoruco National Park.

    Throughout the visit, the army commanding general conducted detailed reviews of ongoing border security operations, assessed troop performance, and checked the functionality of critical infrastructure, including border surveillance systems and communications networks. He also made a stop at Loma del Toro, a key site where military units are stationed to guard critical communications antennas that provide connectivity for the entire southern border region.

    The tour wrapped up at Enriquillo Fortress in Pedernales, the headquarters location of the 16th Infantry Battalion. During a meeting with frontline soldiers stationed at the facility, General Camino Pérez underscored the non-negotiable importance of maintaining strict discipline, constant vigilance, and full adherence to official military protocols. A statement released by the Dominican Republic Army following the inspection noted that these on-site assessments play a critical role in gauging overall operational capacity, addressing unmet personnel needs, and strengthening the country’s ongoing border security initiatives.

  • US Ambassador hosts local leaders aboard USS Nimitz

    US Ambassador hosts local leaders aboard USS Nimitz

    As one of the longest-serving commissioned naval vessels in the world nears the end of its decades of active service, it made a strategically significant stop in Bahamian territorial waters that underscores the deep security ties between the United States and The Bahamas. In a stop timed to tie into U.S. anniversary celebrations, US Ambassador to The Bahamas Herschel Walker welcomed a high-level delegation of Bahamian government and military leaders for a day of engagement aboard the nuclear-powered USS Nimitz, according to official statements from the US Embassy in Nassau.

    This port call was organized as part of the embassy’s Freedom 250 initiative, a nationwide series of events commemorating the 250th anniversary of the United States’ founding. Beyond its anniversary tie-in, the gathering was deliberately structured to showcase the ongoing collaborative security work that forms the backbone of the bilateral relationship between the two neighboring nations.

    During their time aboard the aircraft carrier, the Bahamian delegation — which included National Security Minister Miles Laroda, Energy, Utilities and Aviation Minister JoBeth Coleby-Davis, and Royal Bahamas Defence Force (RBDF) Commodore Floyd Moxey — received a full tour of the vessel’s key operations areas. The group visited the navigation bridge and the expansive flight deck, observed active takeoff and landing operations for deployed aircraft, and viewed a coordinated demonstration of the strike group’s naval capabilities. Walker was joined on the tour by US Defence Attaché Commander Victor Lange, and the entire party was formally received by Rear Admiral Cassidy “Dudley” Norman, commander of Carrier Strike Group 11, which the USS Nimitz leads.

    In remarks following the tour, Walker emphasized the uniquely close bond between the two countries. “The United States and The Bahamas aren’t just friends and neighbors — we’re family,” he said. “The Bahamas and Caribbean are America’s third border, and in many ways our first — it is where our shared security begins. This visit is a powerful reminder that Bahamian security is American security, and we are committed to protecting these waters together.”

    Commissioned in May 1975, the USS Nimitz holds the distinction of being the oldest actively serving aircraft carrier in global operation. This current deployment marks the final tour of duty for the vessel after 51 years of service to the US Navy. For this final deployment, the carrier and its accompanying strike group have been conducting operations across the Caribbean region explicitly to support shared regional security goals.

    US Embassy officials noted that the high-profile visit was far more than a ceremonial stop: it served as a tangible reminder of the decades-long security partnership that anchors US-Bahamas relations. This collaboration includes everything from joint cross-border counternarcotics operations to coordinated maritime security work through Operation Bahamas, Turks and Caicos. It also encompasses a 20-year ongoing partnership between the Rhode Island National Guard and the RBDF. To sustain this cooperation, the US provides approximately $13 million each year in targeted support to the RBDF, covering programming, specialized training, new equipment, and capacity-building initiatives.

    Beyond the broader bilateral partnership, the visit also aligns with the core policy priorities Embassy Nassau has laid out under Ambassador Walker’s leadership: protecting US citizens residing or traveling abroad, securing the shared borders that connect the two nations, and continuing to deepen the people-to-people and government-to-government relationship between the United States and The Bahamas.

  • Court of Appeal grants Fitz Jackson leave to appeal in Scotia Bank cheque fee case

    Court of Appeal grants Fitz Jackson leave to appeal in Scotia Bank cheque fee case

    KINGSTON, Jamaica — A major legal showdown between Jamaican Member of Parliament Fitz Jackson and the Bank of Nova Scotia (Scotiabank) has crossed a critical threshold, with the island’s Court of Appeal delivering a preliminary ruling in the lawmaker’s favor on Monday. Anthony Williams, a member of Jackson’s legal defense team, confirmed the outcome in an interview with local outlet Observer Online, framing the decision as a meaningful early victory for a case that has already reshaped banking practices across Jamaica.

    The conflict at the center of the litigation dates back to early 2024, when Jackson visited a Scotiabranch in Portmore to cash a $2,500 cheque. Upon presenting the check for encashment, bank officials demanded Jackson pay a $385 processing fee to access the funds — a requirement Jackson immediately rejected on statutory grounds. Per the legal team’s argument, Jamaica’s Bills of Exchange Act Section 3 explicitly defines a cheque as an unconditional written order for payment of a fixed sum. By imposing a fee to release the funds, the team argues the bank effectively converted this unconditional instrument into a conditional one, a direct violation of existing law.

    Monday’s ruling marks the end of a lengthy battle just to secure the right to a full appeal hearing. The case first moved through the Supreme Court, where judges granted summary judgement in Scotiabank’s favor — a decision that allowed the bank to dismiss the suit without a full trial. Jackson’s legal team, headed by King’s Counsel Douglas Leys, subsequently filed three applications for leave to appeal, after having two previous requests denied by lower courts.

    In Monday’s decision, the Court of Appeal found that Jackson’s team had presented clear, arguable grounds to challenge the original summary judgement. One key error cited by the legal team in the initial ruling was the fact that Scotiabank itself never formally filed an application for summary judgement. Williams emphasized that under procedural rules, a party that does not seek summary judgement cannot be granted that ruling by default.

    “What we have now is approval to move forward with the full substantive appeal, which we could not do before securing this leave,” Williams explained to reporters. “This is a good success for Mr. Jackson at this stage of the proceedings. The case is very, very live, and we will now prepare our full formal appeal filing.”

    Remarkably, the case has already delivered tangible change to Jamaica’s banking sector even before a final ruling has been issued. Williams confirmed that shortly after Jackson launched his challenge earlier this year, Scotiabank moved to eliminate all cheque encashment fees for its customers nationwide. That shift, he added, makes clear just how broad the stakes of this litigation extend beyond the single $385 fee Jackson refused to pay.

    “This is not a case that affects only Mr. Jackson. This will impact every single person in Jamaica who uses cheques, every player in the domestic banking industry, and even the Bank of Jamaica itself,” Williams noted. “Virtually every institution that handles financial transactions involving cheques and associated fees will feel the impact of a final ruling in this matter. This is a big, consequential case for everyone in the country’s financial system.”

  • ‘Golden opportunity, after years of neglect’ – Shallow

    ‘Golden opportunity, after years of neglect’ – Shallow

    At a recently held “North Leeward Matters” town hall gathering in Golden Grove, Kishore Shallow, the sitting Member of Parliament for the North Leeward constituency of St. Vincent and the Grenadines, has positioned the proposed Roseau River sand and aggregate harvesting operation as a once-in-a-generation chance to reverse what he calls decades of systemic underdevelopment and disinvestment across the area.

    Opening the meeting, which was also attended by Kem Bartholomew, Chief Executive Officer of the Barbados Regional Agricultural Grain and Services Authority (BRAGSA), Shallow pulled no punches in laying out the constituency’s long-standing grievances. For years, he argued, residents of North Leeward have been shortchanged across every key sector, from agricultural opportunities to entrepreneurial support and local employment. The most visible signs of this neglect, he stressed, are the constituency’s crumbling feeder roads and long-neglected bridges, which have remained in a state of disrepair for years, including the structurally deficient crossing in Fitz Hughes that has only just reached the final stages of completion.

    Shallow pointed to one persistent bottleneck that has held back local infrastructure development for decades: the exorbitant cost and logistical challenge of hauling aggregate construction materials all the way from the Rabacca region in northeastern St. Vincent and other distant supply sources. With the Roseau harvesting project set to bring high-quality aggregate production directly to North Leeward, that long-standing barrier will finally be eliminated, he said, drastically cutting the overall cost of all public and private infrastructure projects across the Leeward coast.

    Calling the untapped sand and gravel deposits a “blessing, a gold mine” for the constituency, Shallow revealed that BRAGSA has made a formal commitment that North Leeward will not merely serve as a host for the operation, but will be positioned at the center of the resulting economic and infrastructure gains. Refusing to accept vague, long-term promises of future benefit, Shallow said he pressed Bartholomew for concrete, time-bound deliverables for local residents, demanding clear commitments for gains by the end of the current year and in the immediate 12-month period after. Specific priority projects Shallow has pushed to advance include the construction of new bus stops in Petit Bordel, Rose Bank and Rose Hall, the long-overdue completion of feeder roads that have remained unfinished for more than five years, and the prompt construction of a replacement for the aging Fitz Hughes bridge.

    Beyond infrastructure upgrades, Shallow confirmed that he has secured a formal commitment that priority for all new jobs created by the project will go to North Leeward residents. BRAGSA has no plans to import an outside workforce for the operation, he said, and will instead run specialized training programs to prepare local workers to operate heavy machinery and fill open roles, creating much-needed immediate employment for local people.

    Against a backdrop of widespread local anger over the controversial existing Rayneau quarry operation in Richmond, Shallow took great pains to draw a clear line between that unpopular venture and the new Roseau project. The Richmond quarry, approved by the previous Unity Labour Party (ULP) administration in 2022, sparked widespread outcry after developers moved heavy equipment through active farmland to begin work on a 30-year lease of 59 acres of state-owned agricultural land leased to a St. Lucian businessman. Shallow, who took office last November as part of the New Democratic Party’s landslide 14-1 election victory over the ULP, noted that the Richmond quarry’s environmental impacts have already derailed a planned World Bank-funded recreational development project for the area, demonstrating how poor planning can hold back, rather than advance, local development. In contrast, Shallow explained, the Roseau project has already undergone full expert environmental assessment to avoid the same missteps, and will not alter the natural landscape of the Roseau River coast.

    Going beyond just distinguishing the two projects, Shallow announced that the new administration will launch a full review of the existing Richmond quarry contract. The Attorney General will examine the agreement to identify any legal pathways for action, and the government will also commission an independent environmental assessment of the current quarry operation to address widespread local concerns.

    Shallow also urged local residents to view the Roseau project as both a solution to local grievances and a catalyst for national economic growth. Revenue generated from the operation will flow through BRAGSA to support national development, he explained, and even before full operations have launched, the authority has already secured pre-contracts for aggregate supply to development projects in Canouan, Bequia and other parts of the Grenadines. The project will also allow the country to harvest a valuable natural resource that would otherwise be washed out to sea and lost.

    Wrapping up his remarks, Shallow framed the public town hall, which included full disclosure of contract details for the Canouan supply agreement and public projections of the total value of the Roseau deposits, as part of the new government’s commitment to radical transparency for all state-led infrastructure and resource development projects, emphasizing that the initiative has nothing to hide from local voters.

  • PNM calls for probe into Padarath over Parliament incident

    PNM calls for probe into Padarath over Parliament incident

    A fiery altercation erupted in Trinidad and Tobago’s Parliament on Friday night, after senior government minister Barry Padarath was accused of photographing a parliamentary audio technician, following unsubstantiated claims that microphones on government benches were being intentionally muted by staff.

    The main opposition party, the People’s National Movement (PNM), quickly upped the ante, releasing an official statement demanding both Padarath’s immediate removal from his post as Leader of Government Business in the House of Representatives and a full criminal probe into his conduct.

    In its statement, the PNM rejected Padarath’s core claim that parliamentary staff had deliberately muted government microphones, calling the accusation “astonishing and wholly unsubstantiated”. The party went to bat for parliamentary employees, emphasizing that nonpartisan, professional conduct has always been a cornerstone of the institution’s work, no matter which political party holds power. “Their role is to support the work of Parliament and uphold the institution, not participate in partisan political disputes,” the release read.

    According to the PNM’s account of the incident, after making his claims about muted microphones, Padarath left the government benches, approached the on-duty audio technician, and snapped a photograph of the unsuspecting staff member in full view of sitting MPs and parliamentary observers. The opposition argues that this action cannot be justified under any circumstance: when a senior cabinet minister publicly targets a frontline staff member after accusing them of partisan bias, it creates an unmistakable climate of intimidation for a public servant just doing their job.

    Parliamentary staff must be able to carry out their responsibilities without fear of harassment, political pressure, or interference, the PNM added, framing the incident as a dangerous escalation of the current government’s increasingly hostile posture toward independent state institutions and nonpartisan public servants.

    Alongside calling for a criminal investigation to determine whether Padarath violated laws against intimidating public officers on duty, the PNM has requested that all CCTV footage from the parliamentary chamber, official broadcast recordings, and all other audiovisual records from the night of the incident be preserved and turned over to investigating authorities. The party has reiterated its commitment to protecting the integrity and independence of Parliament and its staff, saying it will not remain idle while public employees are “targeted, intimidated or threatened” for carrying out their official duties.

    The incident quickly spilled over into social media, where multiple opposition lawmakers shared sharp condemnations of Padarath’s actions. Opposition Senator Dr. Amery Browne wrote on his social platforms that the incident was just the latest example of the ruling United National Congress (UNC) government’s disregard for fairness, justice, and constitutional rights for anyone outside the party. Browne also pointed out what he called hypocrisy on Padarath’s part, noting that the minister has historically been the first and loudest to accuse political opponents of hubris and autocracy, and frequently called for officials to be fired over far smaller breaches of conduct.

    For his part, Padarath has not backed down from the confrontation. Speaking the day after the incident, the minister hit back at the opposition, declaring he was “ready for war” over the controversy. He countered that the PNM’s outrage is nothing more than a deliberate distraction tactic, intended to draw public attention away from what he called racist and seditious comments made recently by opposition MP Kareem Marcelle.

  • Central Bank moves to recover $18.7m

    Central Bank moves to recover $18.7m

    A high-stakes fraud case has emerged in Trinidad and Tobago, with the national Central Bank launching major legal action against a local construction company and its two top directors to recover nearly $18.8 million in misappropriated funds tied to a sophisticated forged government cheque scheme. The alleged scam, which dates back to late 2023, was only uncovered during a landmark audit following a shift in Central Bank leadership, shining a light on past access restrictions that blocked oversight officials from examining the bank’s full accounts.

    According to court documents filed with the High Court on June 10, 2026, the defendants in the case are NiPat General Contractors Limited, its managing director Nigel Patterson Vincent, and company director Jackqui Watson-Vincent. The Central Bank, represented by former attorney general Anand Ramlogan of Freedom Law Chambers, is pursuing claims across multiple legal grounds including fraud, conspiracy, unjust enrichment and breach of trust, stemming from a $20 million cheque purportedly issued by the country’s Ministry of Planning and Development.

    The bank’s formal statement of case lays out a clear timeline of the alleged fraud. On September 29, 2023, Vincent deposited the cheque, which was claimed to be drawn on the ministry’s Central Bank-held account and made payable to NiPat, at Republic Bank’s San Juan branch. The instrument was processed through the national Electronic Cheque Clearing System; after an initial query over an endorsement irregularity, Republic Bank re-submitted the cheque for clearing, and the Central Bank ultimately approved it, crediting the full $20 million to NiPat’s corporate account.

    It was not until nearly a month later, on October 26, 2023, that the bank flagged the transaction as fraudulent, after Treasury Division officials confirmed the Ministry of Planning had never issued the cheque, held no outstanding debt to NiPat, and had never contracted the firm for any work or services. Forensic examination also confirmed that the signatures appearing on the cheque were forgeries, and under Trinidad and Tobago’s Bills of Exchange Act, such forged signatures are deemed legally inoperative and grant no right to claim the funds.

    By the time the account was frozen at the Central Bank’s request, almost all of the funds had already been dispersed through a web of suspicious transfers. Court records show that between October 5 and October 25, 2023, NiPat issued 66 separate cheques, moving a total of $18.77 million out of the account. High-value transfers included $10 million to Naissal Construction and Maintenance Services Limited, $2.5 million to R and D Holdings Limited, more than $410,000 in direct payments to Nigel Vincent, $170,000 to Jackqui Watson-Vincent, and $400,000 routed back to NiPat itself. Only $1.23 million was left in the account when it was frozen, a sum that has since been recovered by the Central Bank, leaving a net loss of just over $18.76 million.

    The fraud was not formally brought to light until early 2026, following a major shift in governance at the Central Bank. The fraudulent transaction occurred during the tenure of former governor Alvin Hilaire, whose term ended in June 2025. During his time in office, a public dispute revealed the Central Bank had blocked the Auditor General from accessing and auditing its full accounts. Hilaire’s successor, Larry Howai, took office in 2025 and immediately reversed that policy, granting Auditor General Jaiwantie Ramdass full, unrestricted access to the bank’s financial systems.

    Ramdass flagged the two suspicious fraudulent cheques – the $20 million cheque at the center of the current lawsuit, and a second $25 million cheque – in a formal letter dated January 23, 2026, addressed to the Central Bank Governor. The bank has only launched formal legal action over the $20 million cheque to date. Ahead of filing the suit, the Central Bank issued a formal pre-action notice to the defendants on March 6, 2026. Defendants’ counsel Taradath Singh confirmed he had been retained to represent NiPat and the two Vincent directors in an email dated March 18, 2026, and requested an extension to respond to the pre-action letter, also confirming he had authority to accept legal service on his clients’ behalf.

    The case has been assigned to High Court Justice Sherlanne Pierre. The Central Bank is seeking a full range of legal remedies, including full restitution of the misappropriated funds, damages for deceit and unlawful conspiracy, equitable compensation for breach of trust, a full court-ordered accounting of all profits gained by the individual defendants, a legal declaration that any remaining proceeds from the fraud are held in trust for the Central Bank, annual interest of up to 10% on the outstanding sum, and full coverage of all legal costs incurred by the bank.

  • From microphones to mayhem

    From microphones to mayhem

    Late-night parliamentary proceedings in Trinidad and Tobago descended into disorder on Friday, as a routine review of supplementary budget funding sparked a heated shouting match that ultimately expanded into bitter allegations of biased audio management and intimidation of parliamentary staff.

    The conflict first ignited around 9:30 p.m. during debate over supplementary allocations for the Ministry of Foreign and Caricom Affairs. Opposition Member of Parliament Stuart Young raised sharp questions about a proposed $13.7 million allocation earmarked for renovations to the residence of Trinidad and Tobago’s Permanent Representative in New York. Foreign Minister Sean Sobers defended the spending, explaining that the existing property had been deemed structurally unfit for occupation, forcing the government to pay rent for alternative accommodation for the representative.

    Young pushed back against the explanation, arguing that every diplomatic mission operated by T&T around the globe faces similar maintenance needs, and questioned the government’s decision to prioritize this specific project over others. What began as a policy debate quickly devolved into a shouting confrontation between Young and Sobers, with the minister placing blame squarely on the previous opposition-led administration, accusing it of allowing the country’s embassy properties to fall into disrepair over a decade in power. House Speaker Jagdeo Singh stepped in quickly to calm tensions and restore order to the chamber.

    The conflict took an unexpected turn when Leader of Government Business Barry Padarath raised a separate, long-running grievance: persistent issues with the parliament’s audio system. Padarath claimed that technical staff operating the microphones could not reliably control which speakers were audible, and that the problem had occurred multiple times before. He went further, alleging a deliberate bias from technicians, who he claimed repeatedly muted government members’ microphones during proceedings, with the skewed audio also being broadcast live to the public on the official parliament channel. “This bias will not be tolerated,” Padarath stated, calling for an immediate meeting of the parliamentary Broadcasting Committee to address the issue. Speaker Singh agreed to convene the committee, noting that empirical data could be gathered to verify the claims, and urged legislators to stay focused on the scheduled budget business.

    The announcement immediately triggered uproar from opposition benches. Laventille West MP Kareem Marcelle launched into a furious denunciation, shouting that the ruling government amounted to “a bunch of dictators” and that the incident amounted to “tyranny in this Parliament.” He also accused the government of attempting to bully parliamentary staff, as tensions continued to escalate. When Padarath attempted to respond to the accusations, his microphone was suddenly muted, further inflaming the confrontation. Marcelle continued his outburst, insisting “This is a free and democratic society, what the hell is wrong with this Government!” He also directed criticism at Speaker Singh, arguing that Singh had failed to defend parliamentary staff from improper pressure.

    Opposition lawmakers quickly leveled a new allegation: they claimed Padarath had left his seat, approached the audio technician working in the chamber, and taken a photograph of the staff member in what they described as an intimidating, aggressive act. Speaker Singh said he had not witnessed the incident firsthand, and sought clarification from the Clerk of the House, who confirmed that Padarath had approached the technician to discuss the audio issue. The Clerk subsequently urged the Speaker to issue a clear rule that no legislator should approach parliamentary staff directly during proceedings. Singh called on all members to exercise restraint, noting that parliamentary staff consistently work beyond their required duties to support legislative business and should be treated with respect.

    As uproar continued, Speaker Singh ordered Opposition MP Keith Scotland to stop his repeated outbursts over the alleged injustice, assuring members that the matter would be addressed through proper formal procedures. Young reiterated the opposition’s accusation, repeating the claim that Padarath had personally approached and photographed the technician. Government Minister Michelle Benjamin pushed back on the outrage, asking “And so what?” She added that she was a member of the Broadcasting Committee, and had previously raised concerns about government microphones being improperly muted when the current government was still in opposition, confirming the long-running nature of the audio issue. The outburst of “Shame!” rang out from opposition benches in response to Benjamin’s comments, and Speaker Singh chose to suspend parliamentary proceedings for 10 minutes to allow tensions to cool.

    When the chamber reconvened, Opposition Chief Whip Marvin Gonzales pressed Speaker Singh to formally address the incident, repeating the opposition’s allegation that Padarath had intimidated the technician by taking a photograph of the staff member. Singh stood by his earlier position, noting that he had no direct evidence of the alleged intimidation because he did not witness the encounter. He explained that any formal complaint would have to follow established procedures rather than being debated on the floor. Young pressed further, asking for a formal investigation into the alleged intimidation and potential assault of the staff member. When Singh asked what standing order gave him the authority to unilaterally launch such an investigation, Young argued that the definition of assault includes any action that makes a person fear for their personal safety, framing the incident as meeting that standard. Singh rejected the characterization as hyperbolic, and declined to open an investigation from the chair, reiterating that complaints must follow existing, formal channels.

    Government Minister Saddam Hosein stepped in to issue an official response on behalf of the administration, rejecting the opposition’s intimidation allegations outright. Hosein emphasized that Padarath has a long record of raising concerns about audio muting, dating back to when the current government was in opposition, and that the issue has persisted since the party took office. He argued that Padarath was well within his rights to raise the issue to protect the integrity of parliamentary proceedings, and noted that if the opposition has genuine grievances, they have clear avenues to pursue them through official rules. Young countered that the opposition was not debating the audio issue itself, but the inappropriate conduct of Padarath toward a member of staff. Speaker Singh closed the exchange by reaffirming that the floor of the budget committee was not the appropriate venue to adjudicate allegations against a fellow legislator, and that any complaint must follow the processes laid out in parliament’s standing orders.