分类： politics

Jamaica’s comprehensive $1.7 billion ‘Go Programme’ for national road infrastructure repairs will extend beyond parishes severely affected by Hurricane Melissa, according to Works Minister Robert Morgan. While initially prioritizing western parishes devastated by the hurricane, the government has recognized that road damage exists island-wide, necessitating a broader approach.

Minister Morgan, speaking at Wednesday’s post-Cabinet media briefing at Jamaica House, revealed that approximately 200 roads will undergo repairs by the end of March under the ambitious program. The minister provided detailed breakdowns of allocations across multiple parishes, demonstrating the nationwide scope of the infrastructure initiative.

Clarendon Parish is set to receive $206 million for critical corridors including Four Paths to Guinep Tree, Hazard Drive, and Bustamante Highway, alongside numerous other vital routes. The capital region of Kingston and St. Andrew will benefit from a substantial $500 million investment targeting major thoroughfares such as Mannings Hill Road, Washington Boulevard, and Red Hills Road.

Additional significant allocations include $130 million for St. James Parish, covering Montego Bay’s entire township and connecting routes, $107 million for Trelawny’s road network, and $100 million specifically for Westmoreland to address both hurricane-related damage and existing infrastructure needs. Minister Morgan emphasized that publicly listing the targeted corridors demonstrates governmental acknowledgment of the widespread road deterioration while assuring citizens that ‘solutions are coming’ with many projects already underway.

Jamaica’s electoral governance landscape is witnessing a significant transition as Tom Tavares-Finson, the Jamaica Labour Party’s most enduring representative on the Electoral Commission of Jamaica (ECJ), formally steps down from his position effective January 31. This departure concludes two decades of continuous service spanning both the Electoral Advisory Committee (EAC) and its successor organization, the ECJ.

In an official statement released Wednesday, Tavares-Finson reflected on his extensive tenure, describing it as “a profound honour and privilege to be entrusted with serving at a Commission which is at the centre of the nation’s democratic processes.” He highlighted several landmark achievements during his service, including instrumental contributions to developing Jamaica’s Electronic Voter Identification system, establishing the Political Party Registration process, implementing Campaign Finance Regulations, and substantially enhancing the country’s broader democratic and electoral legal framework.

Tavares-Finson’s appointment trajectory began in 2005 when then-JLP leader Bruce Golding nominated him to the EAC, with subsequent elevation to the ECJ in 2006. Following Golding’s leadership transition, Prime Minister Andrew Holness maintained Tavares-Finson’s commission membership across multiple administrations. His service encompassed five General Elections alongside numerous Local Government Elections and by-elections, providing institutional continuity during Jamaica’s democratic exercises.

The retiring commissioner acknowledged collaborative relationships with distinguished commission chairpersons including Professor Errol Miller, Dr. Herbert Thompson, Dorothy Pine-McLarty, and Earl Jarrett. He also recognized productive partnerships with colleagues across political affiliations, specifically mentioning Danny Buchanan, DK Duncan, and Dr. Aundre Franklin, plus countless Jamaican citizens who served as selected members and election directors.

Tavares-Finson reserved particular gratitude for Prime Minister Holness, recalling his clear directive during reappointment: “Jamaica and its democracy must always come first, before any individual or political party consideration.” This principle, Tavares-Finson noted, became the guiding philosophy throughout his tenure. He concluded by emphasizing the ECJ’s evolution into “a vital pillar of Jamaica’s democratic process” that requires perpetual preservation, reaffirming that “Jamaica and our democratic process must come first, always.”

KINGSTON, Jamaica — Jamaica’s government has announced sweeping reforms to its cybercrime legislation, introducing substantially harsher penalties for digital offenses targeting minors. The 2026 Cybercrimes (Amendment Act), unveiled during a post-Cabinet briefing on Wednesday, represents a comprehensive legal response to growing concerns about children’s vulnerability in digital environments.

Dr. Andrew Wheatley, Minister with responsibility for Science, Technology and Special Projects, detailed the legislative enhancements at the Office of the Prime Minister. The amendments specifically address the heightened risks faced by minors in cyberspace, establishing robust legal protections against online exploitation and abuse.

The revised legislation mandates severe consequences for crimes targeting individuals under 18, with judicial authorities now empowered to impose prison sentences extending up to 20 years for applicable offenses. This sentencing framework represents one of the region’s most stringent approaches to cybercrimes against children.

A pivotal aspect of the reform concerns the legal concept of consent regarding minors. The legislation explicitly states that individuals below 18 years cannot provide legal consent for the publication of intimate images, eliminating previous ambiguities in such cases.

The amendments are designed to address the rapid dissemination of harmful content across digital platforms while preventing secondary victimization of children through online channels. By strengthening enforcement mechanisms and enhancing protective measures, the government aims to create a safer digital environment for Jamaica’s youth.

Minister Wheatley emphasized that these measures demonstrate the government’s commitment to confronting digital threats against minors with serious consequences, while simultaneously adapting legal frameworks to address emerging challenges in an increasingly interconnected society.

KINGSTON, Jamaica — Prominent human rights organization Jamaicans for Justice (JFJ) has broken its customary silence on individual cases to address serious sexual misconduct allegations against Central Westmoreland parliamentarian Dwayne Vaz of the opposition People’s National Party (PNP). The advocacy group has called for immediate, transparent investigative procedures that uphold both legal standards and principles of accountability.

In an unusual Wednesday statement, JFJ explained that the gravity of the accusations—coupled with Vaz’s legislative position—necessitated commentary on broader governance principles. As an elected official, Vaz holds direct influence over gender equality legislation, workplace protection laws, and harassment prevention statutes, making proper accountability mechanisms critically important.

The allegations surfaced publicly through statements from Councillor Julian Chang, prompting JFJ to emphasize the necessity for robust institutional responses. The organization specifically referenced Jamaica’s Sexual Harassment (Protection and Prevention) Act of 2021, which categorizes unwelcome sexual advances that create hostile environments as unlawful conduct. The legislation mandates that organizations prevent harassment, conduct impartial investigations, protect complainants from retaliation, and provide redress pathways.

JFJ urged the PNP to immediately launch an internal investigation that demonstrates accountability, transparency, and fairness, noting that political parties must exemplify national legal standards. Simultaneously, the organization encouraged Councillor Chang to pursue formal complaints through appropriate channels where applicable, ensuring full legal protections and access to remedies.

While acknowledging Vaz’s public denial of the allegations, JFJ maintained that only evidence-based, impartial investigations can establish factual truths. The organization explicitly refrained from judging the allegations’ validity or any party’s culpability, instead emphasizing the necessity of due process for all involved.

JFJ reminded the public that sexual harassment constitutes a severe rights violation capable of causing substantial harm, cautioning against victim-blaming in public discourse. Concurrently, the organization reaffirmed that presumption of innocence remains a fundamental justice principle, entitling the accused to a fair and unbiased process.

The advocacy group concluded by urging the PNP to ensure active, impartial investigation without partisan alignment, stating such an approach is essential for cultivating a culture where harassment is neither tolerated nor minimized.