分类: politics

  • Belize, UN Map Out Country’s Development Future

    Belize, UN Map Out Country’s Development Future

    On May 7, 2026, senior representatives from the Government of Belize and the United Nations Country Team convened in Belmopan, the nation’s capital, for the 7th Joint National Steering Committee Meeting to lay the groundwork for Belize’s long-term development trajectory.

    The high-level gathering brought together chief executive officers, top-ranking government officials, and leaders of UN agency operations in the region to carry out two core tasks: first, a comprehensive review of progress delivered under the existing UN-Belize cooperation framework, and second, early collaborative planning for the next five-year development cycle spanning 2027 to 2031.

    Central to the day’s deliberations was Plan Belize 2.0, the Belizean government’s medium-term national development blueprint that sets strategic priorities through 2030. Attendees also explored ways to refine UN support structures to better align with Belize’s national objectives across key priority areas, including inclusive sustainable growth, cross-sector coordination, and broad-based economic advancement.

    Amalia Mai, Chief Executive Officer of Belize’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade, emphasized the enduring value of the bilateral partnership. She noted that the UN has long played an indispensable role in Belize’s development journey, providing critical technical expertise, facilitating constructive policy dialogue, and supporting the mobilization of financial and human resources to advance the country’s development agenda.

    Raul Salazar, the United Nations Resident Coordinator for Belize, echoed Mai’s remarks while underscoring a key priority for the next cooperation cycle. He stressed that all UN-backed initiatives must continue to deliver tangible, measurable outcomes that directly improve quality of life for ordinary Belizean citizens.

    As the meeting concluded, both sides issued a joint reaffirmation of their shared commitment to continued collaborative action. The partnership will focus not only on advancing Belize’s nationally defined development goals but also on progressing the global Sustainable Development Goals that frame international development cooperation for all member states.

  • Belize, Louisiana Guard Mark 30 Years of Partnership

    Belize, Louisiana Guard Mark 30 Years of Partnership

    Three decades of collaborative security work between Belize’s national defense bodies and the U.S. Louisiana National Guard has hit a landmark milestone, with leaders from both sides gathering last month in New Orleans to honor 30 years of shared strategic cooperation. In April 2026, senior government and military delegates from Belize traveled to Louisiana to mark the anniversary of a partnership first established in 1996 through the U.S. National Guard’s State Partnership Program.

    The anniversary gathering brought together top leadership from both Belize and the United States, creating space to reflect on 30 years of joint progress and outline plans for future collaboration. From its launch, the core mission of the partnership has centered on coordinated tactical training, cross-force military cooperation, and enhancing operational readiness for both Belize’s Defence Force and Coast Guard. Over the 30-year timeline, the scope of the collaboration has expanded far beyond its initial military training focus, growing to encompass joint work in homeland security coordination, cross-border humanitarian aid deployment, and standardized disaster response preparedness.

    During their visit to New Orleans, Belizean delegates took part in a packed schedule of official strategic meetings, professional knowledge exchanges, and guided tours of key regional operational sites. One of the most anticipated stops on the itinerary was a visit to the National WWII Museum, where delegates explored the history of global collective security efforts. The centerpiece of the anniversary celebration was the official commemoration ceremony held at Jackson Barracks, the historic headquarters of the Louisiana National Guard. At the ceremony, leaders from both sides shared reflections on three decades of mutual trust, aligned security priorities, and people-to-people connections forged through joint training and field operations.

    Officials from both nations have emphasized the outsized impact of this 30-year partnership on regional stability in Central America and the Caribbean. Both Belizean and U.S. leadership reiterated that the ongoing collaboration remains a core pillar of bilateral security relations, creating tangible benefits for citizens of both countries and contributing to a more secure regional environment. Looking ahead, leaders have confirmed plans to deepen collaboration in emerging security areas, including climate-driven disaster response and transnational threat mitigation, building on the strong foundation laid over the past three decades.

  • Govt defends migration policy at UN forum

    Govt defends migration policy at UN forum

    Just days after facing heated parliamentary pushback over its controversial planned immigration overhauls, Barbados’ government has carried its policy argument to the global stage, telling a key United Nations gathering that strategic migration management is non-negotiable for the small island nation’s economic survival amid cascading demographic decline, workforce contraction and accelerating climate change pressures.

    Speaking at the Second International Migration Review Forum in New York, Barbados’ Minister of Home Affairs Gregory Nicholls framed migration as a core development strategy rather than a policy challenge for small island developing states (SIDS) grappling with widespread labor gaps, aging populations and climate-driven instability. The quadrennial forum serves as the UN’s flagship global convening, bringing together governments, civil society and private sector stakeholders to evaluate progress on the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, share lessons from implementation hurdles, and align on future commitments to improve global migration governance.

    “Migration, managed well, is not a burden. It is an engine for creativity, innovation and growth,” Nicholls told assembled delegates in his address.

    His comments came on the heels of a fiercely contested debate in Barbados’ House of Assembly over proposed updates to the country’s immigration and citizenship legislation, which the administration has positioned as a critical response to years of population shrinkage, high rates of outward migration among skilled workers, and growing strain on the domestic labor market. During the parliamentary debate, Nicholls emphasized that Barbados’ shrinking and rapidly aging population poses an existential threat to long-term economic growth, the long-term solvency of the national pension system, and the country’s ability to compete in the global tourism and digital services sectors.

    Expanding on that framing for the international audience, Nicholls stressed that for SIDS, climate change and migration are inextricably linked policy priorities, not separate issues. “For small island developing states, climate change and migration are not parallel agendas – they are the same agenda,” he said.

    Nicholls also used the UN platform to highlight Barbados’ recent progress advancing regional integration through a landmark free movement agreement launched last October with three other Caribbean nations: Belize, Dominica, and St Vincent and the Grenadines. The pact grants citizens of all participating states the right to live and work without time limits across member territories, while guaranteeing equal access to public healthcare and primary and secondary education for migrant workers’ children. “This is not generosity. It is obligation built on political will, regional solidarity and human rights,” Nicholls said of the agreement.

    Barbados is also currently developing a comprehensive national migration policy aligned with regional frameworks from the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and the UN Global Compact for Migration. According to Nicholls, the new policy will streamline legal migration pathways, upgrade border management infrastructure and systems, and align immigration rules with the country’s broader economic growth goals.

    This policy direction mirrors key provisions of the Immigration Bill currently under parliamentary consideration, which includes expanded temporary residency categories, more flexible eligibility requirements for permanent residency, and a new points-based merit immigration system designed to attract skilled workers, foreign direct investment, and high-net-worth retirees. The government has repeatedly argued that the reforms are critical to offset decades of demographic decline and boost Barbados’ competitiveness in the global race to attract high-value human capital and business investment.

    Nicholls used his address to renew international backing for climate finance reform through the Bridgetown Initiative, a global advocacy push led by Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley to restructure global development finance and unlock more affordable funding for climate adaptation and loss and damage in vulnerable developing nations. He warned that climate-related displacement is already placing unprecedented strain on border systems, food security and domestic political stability for small island states, stressing that proactive migration planning is a core part of climate adaptation.

    “Migration should be seen as an option, and not a mere act of survival,” he said.

    The minister also outlined ongoing efforts to deepen engagement with the large Barbadian diaspora communities in the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States, through initiatives to encourage diaspora investment, skills sharing with domestic workers, and return migration for Barbadians living overseas who wish to resettle in their home country.

    Closing his address, Nicholls emphasized that Barbados’ participation in the UN forum was not only to share its national perspective, but to build new global and regional partnerships to advance the shared goal of “safe, orderly and dignified migration” for all.

  • Is There a Breakthrough in the San Marcos Land Dispute?

    Is There a Breakthrough in the San Marcos Land Dispute?

    A long-simmering land conflict in southern Belize has taken a major step toward resolution, following a high-stakes negotiating session held this week in the nation’s capital of Belmopan.

    On Wednesday, Indigenous Affairs Minister Dr. Louis Zabaneh convened a direct dialogue with representatives from three key stakeholders: the community of San Marcos, the Toledo Alcalde Alliance, and the Maya Leaders Alliance. The talks were convened to ease escalating tensions between the San Marcos community and a private individual with competing claims to the contested land. By the end of the meeting, both conflicting sides had reached a preliminary agreement to move the process forward.

    In comments following the negotiation, Minister Zabaneh outlined the terms of the tentative deal. Over the next 21 days, technical teams from Belize’s Ministry of Natural Resources will conduct an on-site assessment to formally demarcate the exact parcel of land at the center of the disagreement. “We are grateful that both parties agreed to this collaborative path forward,” Zabaneh stated.

    The minister also highlighted the recent establishment of a joint review panel, which includes both government officials and elected Maya community leaders. This panel is currently working through revisions to draft legislation aimed at addressing long-standing indigenous land rights issues across the country, creating a broader policy framework to prevent similar disputes in the future.

    In the coming days, the Maya Leaders Alliance will fulfill its commitment to community transparency: the group is scheduled to gather with San Marcos residents this Friday to walk through the details of this week’s negotiations, answer questions, and gather community input on the next steps of the process.

    More full remarks from Minister Zabaneh on the San Marcos land dispute will be broadcast during News 5’s evening 6 o’clock program tonight for audiences seeking further updates on the negotiation.

  • Court of Appeal overturns High Court’s ruling on ExxonMobil, EPA’s financial guarantees

    Court of Appeal overturns High Court’s ruling on ExxonMobil, EPA’s financial guarantees

    On Thursday, 7 May 2026, Guyana’s Court of Appeal delivered a unanimous landmark ruling reversing a 2023 High Court judgment that found ExxonMobil Guyana Limited and the country’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in breach of statutory and environmental permit obligations. The decision, handed down by Court President Dawn Gregory Barnes alongside Justices of Appeal Nareshwar Harnanan and Priya Sewnarine-Beharry, marks a major resolution to a high-stakes legal dispute over environmental liability rules for the country’s offshore petroleum operations.

    The case originated in 2023, when activists Frederick Collins and Godfrey Whyte brought a legal challenge against Exxon and the EPA. Then-High Court Justice Sandil Kissoon ruled in the claimants’ favor, accepting the argument that Exxon’s liability for environmental damage from its offshore work must be unlimited, and thus the financial guarantee required under the company’s environmental permit also needed to be uncapped. Justice Kissoon found that Exxon had knowingly violated its obligations by only submitting a US$2 billion capped guarantee, and the EPA had breached its own statutory duties by approving this limited financial assurance. He ordered the EPA to issue an enforcement notice forcing Exxon to secure an unlimited guarantee within 30 days, and threatened to suspend the company’s operating permit if it failed to comply.

    Both Exxon and the EPA appealed the ruling to the Court of Appeal, which immediately granted a stay on Justice Kissoon’s orders pending the appeal outcome. The appellate court heard full legal arguments from all involved parties in February 2026. Andrew Pollard, lead defense counsel for Exxon, outlined the court’s core findings after the ruling was released.

    Pollard explained that the appellate court drew a critical legal distinction between unlimited liability for environmental damage and the separate requirement of financial assurance. The court found that Justice Kissoon had made a legal error by conflating these two distinct concepts. Under the correct interpretation of the permit’s financial provisions, Exxon was only required to submit a guarantee for a fixed, defined amount. The court further held that the EPA retains discretionary authority under Guyana’s Environmental Protection Act and the terms of the permit to approve a capped guarantee, and Justice Kissoon had overstepped his jurisdiction by substituting his own judgment for the agency’s statutorily granted discretion.

    The ruling also confirmed that the EPA and Exxon acted appropriately in negotiating the US$2 billion guarantee, noting that Parliament had designated the EPA as the sole authorized body to make such regulatory determinations. Additionally, the court threw out Justice Kissoon’s finding that the insurance policy submitted by Exxon and approved by the EPA did not meet international petroleum industry standards, as there was no admissible evidence presented to support that conclusion. All orders issued by the High Court in 2023 were formally set aside.

    The path to the appellate ruling included a prior detour at the regional Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ). The Guyana Court of Appeal initially blocked the country’s Attorney General from joining the case as a party, but the CCJ overturned that decision, emphasizing that the Attorney General is tasked with representing public interest, and this dispute carried significant public interest implications. That ruling cleared the way for the Attorney General to participate in the appellate proceedings and submit legal arguments.

    Multiple legal teams represented the diverse parties in the case: Exxon was represented by Andrew Pollard SC, Edward Luckhoo SC, and Eleanor Luckhoo; the EPA was represented by Sanjeev Datadin and Mohanie Anganoo; claimants Collins and Whyte were represented by Seenath Jairam SC, Saevion David-Longe, Melinda Janki, and Abiola Wong-Inniss; and the state was represented by Attorney General Anil Nandlall, Arud Gossai, and Shoshanna Lall.

  • Demerara Bank loses bid for High Court to throw out WIN members’ account closure cases

    Demerara Bank loses bid for High Court to throw out WIN members’ account closure cases

    On Thursday, 7 May 2026, Guyana’s Full Court delivered a landmark ruling against Demerara Bank, dismissing the financial institution’s appeal that sought to block six senior members of the country’s main opposition party We Invest in Nationhood (WIN) from legally challenging the bank’s unexplained closure of their personal accounts.

    The three-judge panel — led by Chief Justice Navindra Singh, alongside Justices Deborah Kumar-Chetty and Nigel Niles — upheld the lower court’s original decision, ordering Demerara Bank to submit a formal defensive affidavit to the court by 21 May 2026. The ruling also mandated that the bank pay 100,000 Guyanese dollars in legal costs to each of the six claimants by 1 June 2026. The six affected WIN members are Gobin Harbajhan, Denodra Park, Dexter George, Joel Ramesh, Lester Benjamin, and Denitta Parkes, who are represented by private attorney Darren Wade. Demerara Bank’s legal team was led by Devindra Kissoon, Natasha Vieria, and A. Dev.

    In its written judgment, the Full Court panel clarified that Demerara Bank’s procedural choice to pursue a strike-out application against the claimants’ Fixed Date Application (FDA), rather than filing a substantive defense directly, caused unnecessary delays in the legal process. “The appellant’s decision to challenge the FDA by way of a strike-out application has protracted the resolution of this matter,” the judgment read. “When weighing the core arguments presented to the lower court, we find that a defensive affidavit should have been filed from the outset, allowing the trial judge to assess the substantive claim on its legal merits.”

    The court further noted that Demerara Bank failed to provide sufficient evidence to support its claim that the opposition members’ FDA was scandalous, frivolous, vexatious, or an improper abuse of court process. The panel confirmed that the claimants had raised an arguable legal case with reasonable grounds to bring their challenge, rejecting the bank’s assertion that the suit had no legitimate path to success.

    Demerara Bank’s appeal originated from a dispute over the unexplained account closures. Instead of responding to the claimants’ FDA with a formal substantive defense, the bank opted to file a motion to have the entire claim struck from the court docket. The bank’s core arguments included that the FDA did not disclose a valid legal cause of action, that the claim was legally misconceived, and that the requested relief could not be granted under Guyanese law. Demerara Bank also argued that there was no connection between the account closures and Guyana’s Anti-Money Laundering and Countering of Financing Terrorism (AML/CFT) Act, that no private legal claim could arise from alleged breaches of that legislation, that the claimants lacked legal standing to bring the suit because the bank is not subject to public law remedies, that no implicit duty of good faith exists in customer banking contracts, and that the bank owes no fiduciary duty of trust or confidence when making the decision to close a customer’s account.

    Counsel for the six opposition members pushed back against all of the bank’s claims, arguing that a clear legal cause of action does exist. The claimants contend that an implicit duty of good faith is a standard component of all banking contractual relationships in Guyana, and that Demerara Bank breached that fundamental overriding duty when it shut down their accounts without any warning or explanation.

  • PM moving ahead with dev’t bank despite IMF objection

    PM moving ahead with dev’t bank despite IMF objection

    Prime Minister Godwin Friday of St. Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG) is holding firm to his administration’s flagship plan to launch a national development bank (NDB), pushing forward despite explicit warnings and opposition from the Washington-based International Monetary Fund (IMF). The proposal, a core campaign promise of Friday’s New Democratic Party (NDP) that won a landslide 14 out of 15 parliamentary seats in the November 2025 general election, is framed by the prime minister as a critical intervention to reverse years of economic stagnation and address the country’s soaring public debt crisis.

    Speaking on NBC Radio this Thursday, Friday — who also holds portfolios for finance, legal affairs and justice, economic planning, and private sector development — explained that the NDB is designed to solve long-standing structural barriers that block small and non-traditional businesses from accessing affordable credit. SVG currently carries a public debt load equivalent to 113% of its gross domestic product, and Friday warned that without bold policy changes, that figure could climb to 145% or higher within five years, a trajectory he calls completely unacceptable.

    While the prime minister acknowledges that the country’s debt profile is severe and requires careful management, he argues that accelerating inclusive economic growth is the fastest route out of the current crisis. He noted that even in discussions with IMF officials, the fund has agreed that growth is the most effective way to reduce debt burdens over time. The IMF has projected that SVG’s economic growth will moderate to 3.7% in 2025 as post-pandemic tourism and construction rebounds fade, and decelerate further to a medium-term average of 2.7% between 2026 and 2027 amid high global oil prices and a weaker global economic outlook. For Friday, this slow growth forecast makes the NDB a more urgent priority, not a less necessary one.

    “This is the way we get out of the difficult situation that we are in, and we have to transform our economy,” Friday said. “We have to unleash the creative and business potential in our economy and make it available to ordinary people to start doing things to grow our economy.”

    The IMF’s opposition, outlined by mission chief for SVG Sergei Antoshin in an April 28 statement, centers on three key concerns: risks to debt sustainability from adding a new quasi-fiscal institution to an already heavily indebted economy, the potential for contingent liabilities that could force the government to inject emergency public funds down the line, and the risk of political interference in lending decisions that has plagued regional development banks in the past, leading to high rates of non-performing loans. Antoshin also referenced a history of underperformance among similar institutions across the Caribbean.

    Critics have also framed the new NDB as a revival of a failed 1970s-era development bank launched by a previous administration, which was eventually absorbed into the National Commercial Bank after being deemed a stillborn, unsuccessful experiment. Friday rejected these claims, emphasizing that the project is not rooted in ideology or a bid to redeem old failed political initiatives. Instead, he argued that continuing with the status quo of fragmented lending support has not worked, and the NDB is a pragmatic solution to the proven problem of limited credit access.

    “Everybody identifies the problem, and we come back to the same thing — is to try to deal with what we have as if that is the perfection that we’re seeking. It doesn’t work. That’s what we have seen,” Friday said. “What we’re saying is what is the best way in which to achieve this, and that is why we are pursuing this objective, because we believe that, properly managed, properly established, that it can meet that need.”

    Friday confirmed that his administration will take the IMF’s concerns into account during the institutional design phase to avoid the pitfalls that derailed past projects. He noted that well-governed development banks across the Caribbean have delivered tangible economic benefits, proving that successful operations are not an impossibility. When asked about the risk of political lending — where loans are approved based on party affiliation rather than viable business plans — Friday said the bank’s long-term survival depends on strict, consistently applied lending standards.

    “For it to survive, for it to achieve its objective, it has to function on set principles that everybody understands,” he said. “You want to be generous and supportive of small investors and so forth… but the only way you can sustain that is if you’re also rigorous in terms of the standards that are applied to the lending of the money and the ways in which they are monitored and required to pay back. If you’re going to do it on a political basis, then you are not serious about the development of the country.”

    Unlike commercial banks, Friday said the NDB’s success will not be measured by profit maximization, but by the growth and performance of its borrowers. Currently, scattered government lending and support schemes for underserved groups operate across multiple separate entities, including the Farmer Support Company and the National Student Loan Company, which serve borrowers that commercial banks routinely reject. Friday framed the NDB as a way to consolidate these fragmented functions, introduce professional management, cut overhead costs, and improve overall efficiency. Beyond lending, the new bank will also provide ongoing business support services to help borrowers succeed, rather than just disbursing funds and leaving borrowers to sink or swim.

    On the topic of capitalization, Friday said the government has already identified initial seed funding in the national budget and has received positive feedback from external partners approached for support. The administration has reallocated approximately EC$1.5 million in seed funding to the project, and plans to grow the bank’s capital base over time without relying on expensive high-interest borrowing. Proceeds from the government’s upcoming citizenship by investment programme, which is set to launch soon, will also contribute to the bank’s capital, as these funds come with no interest obligations. The government targets raising at least EC$10 million in capital by the end of the year, a goal Friday calls entirely feasible.

    “What we can’t do is borrow money at 5, 6 and 7% and then put in the bank and you have to lend [at] 12%. That is not going to work,” he added.

  • WATCH: Promised housing for Petersfield High shelterees ‘not ready’, says Dwayne Vaz

    WATCH: Promised housing for Petersfield High shelterees ‘not ready’, says Dwayne Vaz

    A Jamaican opposition politician has publicly condemned the national government for failing to deliver on a critical pledge to relocate displaced hurricane survivors from a Westmoreland Parish school shelter by the agreed deadline, leaving dozens of residents stuck in unsanitary, dangerous conditions.

    Dwayne Vaz, the People’s National Party Member of Parliament for Westmoreland Central, says the administration’s missed May 8 deadline has forced people who were staying at the Petersfield High School hurricane shelter to move into adjacent, rodent-infested housing originally built for school teachers.

    The government’s original promise included the construction of 50 prefabricated container homes at a new site in Shrewsbury, located just a short distance from the current overcrowded school shelter. But according to Vaz, work on the development has barely progressed: only five concrete foundations have been poured, and no basic infrastructure including electricity, running water, or a working sewage system has been installed at the property.

    Vaz placed direct blame for the delay squarely on the head of the Minister of Local Government, arguing that the failure to keep this promise to vulnerable survivors exposes deep-seated incompetence within the minister’s portfolio. He has now called on Jamaica’s Prime Minister to step in and address what he frames as a clear case of mismanagement of the national hurricane recovery program.

    “We are calling out the prime minister. Please assist the residents in Shrewsbury and get them to where was promised to them,” Vaz told reporters.

    The Ministry of Local Government and Community Development first made the public commitment to relocation last month, as part of the country’s ongoing post-disaster recovery work. The pledge came in the wake of unconfirmed reports that shelter residents were engaging in inappropriate sexual conduct in the presence of students attending the school, sparking public outcry over the continued use of campus facilities as long-term emergency housing.

    The survivors currently housed at the site were displaced by Hurricane Melissa, which impacted Jamaica in recent years, leaving hundreds of residents across the country without permanent housing.

  • Senator Tomlinson cites ‘trust deficit’ as he flags lack of accountability in NaRRA Bill

    Senator Tomlinson cites ‘trust deficit’ as he flags lack of accountability in NaRRA Bill

    KINGSTON, Jamaica — In a sharply critical address during Friday’s Senate debate on landmark post-disaster legislation, Opposition Senator Cleveland Tomlinson has drawn national attention to a stark “trust deficit” at the heart of the proposed National Reconstruction and Resilience Authority (NaRRA) Bill, warning that the legislation’s weak accountability frameworks could open the door for unchecked misuse of billions in public reconstruction funds. NaRRA was framed by the ruling administration as a dedicated central body to coordinate recovery and rebuilding efforts after Hurricane Melissa, a catastrophic storm that inflicted an estimated $12.2 billion USD in widespread damage across the island nation. But Tomlinson argues that the legislation’s structural flaws, paired with the government’s own track record on constitutional compliance, make granting the proposed body such broad, unconstrained power unjustifiable. In his remarks to the upper chamber, Tomlinson framed the debate as a fundamental question of good governance, rather than a partisan attack. “When a Government asks its citizens to accept a statutory body with vast powers, a single unaccountable executive, no governing board, no audit committee, no mandatory parliamentary oversight of its directions and decisions, when it asks for that level of trust, the threshold question is: has this Government demonstrated, through its conduct in office, the kind of probity and respect for institutional boundaries and constitutional norms that would justify giving any administration this kind of unrestrained executive authority over billions of public dollars?” he said. Tomlinson went on to note that the government has repeatedly received adverse constitutional rulings from Jamaica’s independent judiciary, a matter of public record that he says directly undermines its claim to unchecked executive authority. “This is a Government that has faced repeated adverse findings in our courts on constitutional grounds. This is a Government whose record of respect for constitutional constraints has been tested and found wanting, not by the Opposition, but by the judiciary,” he stated. “When the courts of this land have had occasion to examine whether this administration has remained within its constitutional boundaries, the rulings have not been flattering. That is a matter of public record, and it is directly relevant to whether this Senate should be comfortable passing legislation that concentrates this much un-reviewed executive power in this administration’s hands.” Beyond constitutional concerns, Tomlinson pointed to longstanding systemic issues in Jamaica’s public financial management that the proposed legislation fails to address, and in fact exacerbates. Under the current draft of the bill, Tomlinson explained, NaRRA would operate outside the standard national budget appropriation process, with no explicit language confirming it falls under regular budget oversight. The body’s chief executive officer would be permitted to sign procurement contracts of any value without a required co-signatory, while written operational directions from the responsible minister would not need to be gazetted, reported to parliament, or released publicly to the people whose funds are being spent. “In a country where procurement irregularities have been a persistent feature of public life, where major infrastructure projects have been plagued by cost overruns and questionable contractor selections, the Government is asking us to create a procurement and project delivery vehicle with less oversight than the bodies that already exist. That is extraordinary,” Tomlinson said. The senator emphasized that his critique is not an accusation that the current government intends to embezzle public funds, but rather a defense of the core principles of institutional accountability that apply regardless of which party holds power. “This is not an argument that the Government is planning to steal. It is an argument that good governance does not depend on the personal integrity of those who happen to hold power at any given moment. Good governance depends on systems, on structures, on checks and balances that work regardless of who is in office,” he said. Closing his remarks, Tomlinson summarized the core failure of the proposed bill, noting that the creation of a dedicated reconstruction authority is not the problem — the lack of guardrails to ensure it serves the public good is. “The tragedy of this Bill is not that it creates NaRRA; it is that it creates NaRRA without the institutional architecture that would make it trustworthy under any Government,” he added. Reporting by Lynford Simpson.

  • US says two dead, one survivor in latest boat strike

    US says two dead, one survivor in latest boat strike

    In a latest development of the United States’ escalating anti-narcotics operation in the eastern Pacific Ocean, the US military confirmed Friday that it has targeted and struck another vessel accused of involvement in drug trafficking. The attack left two people dead and one person still alive, with an ongoing search and rescue mission organized by the US Coast Guard.