分类: politics

  • State Council approves relief from work duties for delegates of People’s Power whose responsibilities allow it

    State Council approves relief from work duties for delegates of People’s Power whose responsibilities allow it

    In an unprecedented move addressing Cuba’s severe economic and political challenges, the Council of State has authorized the temporary release of municipal delegates from their regular employment duties to strengthen connections with constituents. The decision, formalized through Agreement No. 556-X on February 9, 2026, comes as the nation grapples with fuel shortages, energy system failures, and deteriorating public services exacerbated by recent U.S. government measures.

    Juan Esteban Lazo Hernández, President of the National Assembly of People’s Power, announced the measure citing constitutional provisions that mandate delegates to balance their elected responsibilities with community needs. The resolution acknowledges the critical role delegates played during the pandemic and subsequent weather emergencies, highlighting their established capacity for maintaining direct constituent communication.

    Under the agreement, Municipal Assembly presidents will assess which delegates can be temporarily relieved from their professional occupations based on work flexibility considerations. Those unable to leave their jobs will maintain constituent relationships primarily during non-working hours, with enhanced emphasis on community participation in problem-solving initiatives.

    The directive establishes a comprehensive framework for crisis management communication, requiring delegates to regularly update constituents about national developments while collecting community feedback and proposals. People’s Councils will intensify oversight of local entities, particularly focusing on food production, energy distribution, and price control measures implemented by the government.

    Local administrations must actively support the initiative despite current resource constraints, with the Commission for Attention to Local Organs of People’s Power monitoring implementation progress. The measure represents one of Cuba’s most significant adjustments to grassroots governance mechanics since the 2019 adoption of Law No. 132 governing Municipal Assemblies structure and functionality.

  • Prime Minister Drew Continues CARICOM Consultations with Visits to Dominica and Grenada Ahead of 50th Heads of Government Meeting

    Prime Minister Drew Continues CARICOM Consultations with Visits to Dominica and Grenada Ahead of 50th Heads of Government Meeting

    In a strategic diplomatic maneuver ahead of the landmark 50th CARICOM Heads of Government Meeting, St. Kitts and Nevis Prime Minister Hon. Dr. Terrance Drew has embarked on a crucial regional consultation tour. The CARICOM Chair commenced high-level bilateral engagements today with Dominica and Grenada, signaling a concerted effort to foster regional consensus on pressing Caribbean issues.

    Prime Minister Drew’s diplomatic mission features substantive dialogues with Dominica’s Prime Minister Hon. Roosevelt Skerrit and Grenada’s Prime Minister Hon. Dickon Mitchell. These face-to-face consultations represent a deliberate strategy to enhance coordination among member states and address critical regional challenges through direct leadership engagement.

    The agenda for these discussions encompasses multifaceted regional priorities, with particular emphasis on building economic resilience against global uncertainties, addressing climate change vulnerabilities unique to Caribbean nations, strengthening regional security mechanisms, and advancing sustainable development goals. A central focus remains on deepening CARICOM integration frameworks during a pivotal period for the regional bloc.

    The forthcoming 50th Regular Meeting of the Conference of Heads of Government, scheduled for February 24-27, 2026 in St. Kitts and Nevis, marks a historic milestone in Caribbean regional cooperation. Prime Minister Drew’s proactive consultation approach demonstrates commitment to ensuring that the summit produces substantive outcomes addressing the most urgent concerns facing the Caribbean Community.

    This diplomatic initiative underscores the importance of personal engagement at the highest levels of Caribbean leadership to navigate complex regional issues and strengthen collective action within the CARICOM framework.

  • Ministry of Culture hires international firm for State arbitration case

    Ministry of Culture hires international firm for State arbitration case

    The Dominican Ministry of Culture has formally validated its procurement process for specialized legal representation services through Exception Procedure CULTURA-CCC-PEOR-2026-001, conducted via the Public Procurement Transactional Portal. This procedure, authorized under Article 78, sole paragraph, numeral 11 of Law No. 47-25 on Public Procurement, specifically addresses the engagement of international legal expertise for safeguarding state interests in complex arbitration matters.

    The procurement initiative stems from an investment dispute notification filed against the Dominican State by a U.S. corporation in 2025. The controversy originates from a dormant cultural sector contract initially established in 2010, which has remained inactive for over ten years. Recognizing the technical complexities inherent in international arbitration proceedings, the Ministry determined that specialized external legal counsel was imperative for mounting an effective defense.

    A rigorous multi-criteria evaluation process was administered by an inter-institutional technical commission comprising representatives from the Legal Counsel of the Executive Branch, the Attorney General’s Office, the Ministry of Culture, and the Ministry of Industry, Commerce, and MSMEs (MICM). This commission oversaw the assessment of internationally recognized law firms to ensure optimal selection based on expertise and capability.

    The Ministry has emphasized its unwavering commitment to procedural transparency and strict compliance with national regulations throughout the process. All actions have been undertaken within the established legal framework to ensure robust protection of the Dominican State’s interests in this international legal dispute.

  • Social media ‘joke’ turns into criminal conviction hours before polls open

    Social media ‘joke’ turns into criminal conviction hours before polls open

    In a dramatic pre-election development, a Christ Church man faces legal consequences for orchestrating a viral social media hoax targeting Barbados Labour Party (BLP) candidate Wilfred Abrahams. Akeem Renaldo Durant, 27, pleaded guilty to charges of malicious communication under the Computer Misuse Act after posting fabricated content alleging Abrahams had distributed cash through campaign envelopes.

    The incident unfolded on Monday when Durant published a video showing himself opening what appeared to be an election circular containing currency notes, falsely attributing the money to Abrahams. Although Durant subsequently retracted his claims in a follow-up video, describing the original post as a joke and offering apologies, authorities determined the damage had already been done. The Barbados Police Service moved swiftly to arrest and charge the individual as the nation prepared for snap general elections.

    Appearing before Chief Magistrate Deidre McKenna at Oistins Magistrates’ Court, Durant was granted bail set at $5,000 with one surety. His sentencing hearing is scheduled for the coming Monday, where he could face penalties including substantial fines or imprisonment under Barbados’ cybercrime legislation.

    Abrahams, who serves as Home Affairs Minister in the outgoing Mottley administration, expressed profound disappointment over the incident. The BLP candidate for Christ Church East revealed the personal and professional toll of the fabricated allegations, noting that the false claims forced him to divert crucial campaign resources to address the controversy during the election’s final hours.

    The minister emphasized the broader implications of such digital misinformation, stating: ‘This incident not threatened my personal reputation but compromised the integrity of our entire electoral process. Our volunteers who prepared campaign materials, our party’s credibility, and even international perceptions of Barbados’ democratic systems were potentially undermined.’

    Abrahams acknowledged receiving overwhelming support from constituents and international observers who recognized the allegations as false. However, he highlighted the dangerous precedent such actions establish for political discourse in the digital age, particularly noting how quickly unverified content can circulate globally.

    Section 14 of Barbados’ Computer Misuse Act explicitly prohibits electronic communications intended to cause distress, anxiety, or inconvenience, with penalties reaching $50,000 in fines, five years’ imprisonment, or both. The timing of this case, occurring mere hours before national elections, underscores the growing challenge of digital misinformation in democratic processes worldwide.

  • Bruce, Wickham outline likely Attorney General picks on election eve

    Bruce, Wickham outline likely Attorney General picks on election eve

    As Barbados prepares for pivotal elections this Wednesday, political experts are analyzing the most qualified candidates to assume the crucial role of Attorney General in the incoming administration. With the swearing-in of a new Prime Minister and Attorney General scheduled for Thursday, political scientists Devaron Bruce and Peter Wickham have provided exclusive insights into potential appointments under both major political parties.

    The current Attorney General, Dale Marshall, will remain in his position until his successor is formally inaugurated following his recent announcement retiring from elective politics. Constitutional protocols mandate that the prime minister and chief legal adviser must be sworn in before other cabinet members to lead the new government.

    Regarding the Barbados Labour Party (BLP), analyst Bruce identified three prominent legal professionals as strongest contenders: Michael Lashley, Gregory Nicholls, and Kerrie Symmonds. Symmonds, candidate for St James Central, received particular emphasis for his extensive litigation background and senior party status. “His ministerial experience, including in Foreign Affairs, makes him a compelling candidate,” Bruce noted. Michael Lashley (The City candidate) was recognized for his criminal law expertise, though Bruce highlighted potential challenges transitioning from defense attorney to chief law enforcement officer. Gregory Nicholls (St Thomas) was praised for his constitutional law foundation and legislative defense experience in the Senate.

    For the Democratic Labour Party (DLP), Bruce suggested Verla Depeiza (potentially through Senate appointment), Neil Marshall, and Corey Greenidge as possible options. He expressed reservations about Greenidge’s experience level while identifying Marshall as potentially the most qualified due to his constitutional law and litigation background.

    Pollster Peter Wickham presented a more concise assessment, highlighting Wilfred Abrahams (BLP Christ Church East) as a logical successor given his experience as acting Attorney General and current role as Minister of Home Affairs. Regarding DLP possibilities, Wickham suggested former parliament member Adriel Brathwaite might return through Senate appointment, while expressing uncertainty about other candidates’ suitability.

    Both analysts noted that under Westminster tradition, parties typically announce their intended Attorney General selection before election day, providing voters with this information when heading to the polls.

  • UDP Accuses PM of Meddling, Presses On with BTL–Speednet Fight

    UDP Accuses PM of Meddling, Presses On with BTL–Speednet Fight

    In a sharply worded press conference at its Belize City headquarters, the United Democratic Party has launched a vigorous offensive against Prime Minister John Briceño’s administration regarding the controversial BTL-Speednet acquisition deal. The UDP leadership has rejected the Prime Minister’s recent call for a temporary halt to negotiations, characterizing it as improper governmental meddling in what should be an independent regulatory process.

    Party leader Tracy Taegar-Panton asserted that the Prime Minister’s intervention demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of proper governance procedures, insisting that the Public Utilities Commission should maintain exclusive jurisdiction over the acquisition without political interference. The UDP simultaneously claimed credit for forcing the administration’s change in approach, citing recent public protests organized by the party as the catalyst for the government’s newfound interest in transparency.

    ‘Remarkably, the nation’s Prime Minister himself now calls for a suspension of this transaction to facilitate public consultation conducted with respect and transparency,’ stated Panton. ‘This sudden emphasis on accountability and parliamentary oversight aligns precisely with what we have demanded from the outset. This continual shifting of position raises serious concerns about the valuation methodology, the financial architecture of this arrangement, and ultimately who stands to benefit from this proposed acquisition of a public institution.’

    The escalating political confrontation highlights growing tensions over the proposed telecommunications merger, with the opposition vowing to maintain pressure on the administration despite the Prime Minister’s attempted intervention in the process.

  • UDP Demands PUC Autonomy Amid PM Pause

    UDP Demands PUC Autonomy Amid PM Pause

    In a significant political development on February 10, 2026, the United Democratic Party (UDP) has launched a direct challenge against perceived executive interference in regulatory affairs. Party Leader Tracy Panton announced the UDP’s intention to bypass traditional government channels and engage directly with Belize’s Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and Social Security Board regarding the controversial BTL acquisition matter.

    The UDP’s move comes as a response to what they characterize as inappropriate executive influence over independent regulatory bodies. Panton emphasized that both the PUC and Social Security Board operate under established legal frameworks that should preclude direct instruction from the Prime Minister or government ministers. “There are laws that govern the function of the PUC,” Panton stated, “and no prime minister or Minister of Government should have to instruct the PUC what to do in the public’s interest.”

    Panton further criticized the composition of the PUC, noting that all members were appointed by the current Briceno administration. The UDP leader called for greater accountability, transparency, and professionalism from those serving in regulatory capacities, arguing that appointees should not await instructions from the head of state when clear legal guidelines already exist for handling such matters.

    The party’s parliamentary caucus and leadership team plan to formally meet with both regulatory bodies to present their position on record regarding the BTL acquisition, signaling a strategic shift toward direct engagement with independent institutions rather than working through executive branch channels.

  • UDP Boycotts House Meeting, Cites PM Disrespect

    UDP Boycotts House Meeting, Cites PM Disrespect

    In a dramatic political standoff, Belize’s United Democratic Party (UDP) has formally boycotted a recent House of Representatives sitting, escalating tensions with Prime Minister Johnny Briceño’s administration. The opposition party justified its absence as a protest against what it characterizes as governmental corruption and disrespect toward parliamentary procedures.

    Central to the controversy is the acquisition deal involving telecommunications providers BTL and Smart, which UDP leadership claims lacked transparency and proper oversight. Senator Gabriel Zetina emphasized that the boycott decision was reached collectively by UDP parliamentarians without coercion, characterizing it as a necessary action against perceived governmental misconduct.

    UDP Leader Tracy Panton delivered particularly sharp criticism, accusing the Briceño administration of attempting to use the national assembly as a ‘rubber stamp for corruption.’ She highlighted the Prime Minister’s contradictory position regarding the BTL transaction—initially claiming no knowledge of the deal involving his family’s company, then subsequently directing a pause in proceedings.

    The term ‘kunumunu’ (a Belizean Creole term implying foolishness or lack of intelligence) was invoked by UDP representatives to describe how they believe the government perceives opposition parliamentarians, underscoring the deepening rift between Belize’s leading political factions. This parliamentary boycott represents one of the most significant confrontations between the UDP and the ruling administration in recent legislative sessions.

  • UDP Slams Police as Yellowman’s Detention Dispute Grows

    UDP Slams Police as Yellowman’s Detention Dispute Grows

    A major political confrontation has intensified in Belize following the controversial detention of United Democratic Party affiliate Brian “Yellowman” Audinett. The incident, occurring on February 10, 2026, has sparked allegations of political targeting and escalated into a serious institutional crisis.

    The controversy began when police detained Audinett under unclear circumstances, with conflicting reports suggesting either suspected gang membership or potential incitement of violence. The UDP responded by blockading the strategic Belcan Bridge, demanding his immediate release.

    The situation escalated dramatically when UDP Senator Sheena Pitts launched a scathing attack against police authorities. Pitts revealed that official documentation labeled Audinett with the acronym “BMOG” (Believed Member of Gang), which she vehemently disputed based on lifelong acquaintance with the detainee.

    In a remarkable counteraccusation, Senator Pitts directly challenged Police Commissioner Chester Williams to investigate the ruling People’s United Party as a criminal organization. “Let your first order of business go to arrest the prime minister as the head of the PUP gang,” she declared during her impassioned address.

    The senator further accused authorities of systematically weaponizing terminology to suppress legitimate political opposition, claiming those fighting for their rights are being deliberately characterized as violent gang members. She specifically called for the arrest of northern cabinet ministers, suggesting equal application of detention policies across political affiliations.

    This developing situation represents a significant deterioration in police-political relations and raises serious questions about the neutrality of law enforcement in Belize’s democratic processes.

  • OSH Bill Passes Without UDP, But Party Supports It

    OSH Bill Passes Without UDP, But Party Supports It

    In a significant legislative development, Belize’s government has successfully enacted the landmark Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Bill during Friday’s parliamentary session. The passage occurred despite the notable absence of United Democratic Party (UDP) representatives from the House Sitting.

    The comprehensive legislation establishes enhanced workplace protection protocols, marking a historic advancement in worker safety regulations. Following the bill’s approval, UDP Senator Gabriel Zetina publicly clarified his party’s position, emphasizing their fundamental support for the legislation while expressing specific implementation concerns.

    Senator Zetina stated, ‘The UDP Parliamentarian caucus views advancing this amendment bill as a progressive step forward. We unequivocally declare our principled support for this legislation.’ However, he highlighted significant reservations regarding the extensive powers granted to enforcement inspectors under the new law.

    The UDP’s primary concern centers on provisions allowing inspectors to mandate potentially expensive examinations and tests at employers’ expense. While acknowledging the necessity of enforcement mechanisms, Zetina cautioned that ‘unchecked authority without clear safeguards could generate operational uncertainty and financial pressure, particularly affecting small enterprises.’

    Moving forward, the opposition party has committed to monitoring the implementation process closely, ensuring the legislation achieves its worker protection objectives without creating disproportionate burdens on the business community, especially small-scale operations. The UDP intends to advocate for balanced application of the new regulations while safeguarding against potential authority misuse by inspectors and ministerial officials.