分类: politics

  • Gov’t halts live cattle exports as Bruce pushes abattoir plan

    Gov’t halts live cattle exports as Bruce pushes abattoir plan

    St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ new administration has formally suspended all exports of live cattle and other livestock to neighboring Grenada, Agriculture Minister Israel Bruce has announced, framing the move as a critical first step to shore up domestic food security, protect local livelihoods, and crack down on systemic praedial larceny across the country’s agricultural sector.

    In an interview with NBC Radio, Bruce explained that the country is currently not positioned to sustain cross-border live animal shipments, noting that priority must be given to securing stable domestic supply chains, safeguarding downstream small businesses, and enforcing stricter controls against livestock theft that has plagued local farmers for years. The suspension directly responds to long-running complaints from butchers, small food entrepreneurs, and local producers, and aligns with the government’s broader agenda to build a modern, regulated abattoir, upgrade national meat quality standards, and eliminate widespread farm theft.

    “I am squarely of the view that we are not in the best position at this moment to get involved in or to continue the practice of shipping live animals across to Grenada,” Bruce stated. “There is now a halt on that programme.”

    The practice of exporting live cattle to Grenada was first launched by the previous Unity Labour Party administration, and continued even as local industry stakeholders repeatedly raised alarms over its impact on domestic beef availability, particularly during peak demand periods. Bruce, who took office as part of the newly elected New Democratic Party government in November, acknowledged that unregulated live exports have created cascading disruptions across St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ entire local meat supply chain.

    To illustrate the harm of the prior policy, Bruce cited the experience of small burger vendors who sourced product from a popular butcher based in Gun Hill. That butcher relied on a consistent inflow of local cattle to serve his own customers, including clients on the island of Mustique. Once live exports reduced the number of cattle available for local slaughter, the butcher lost access to enough animals to fulfill his orders, forcing him to exit the Mustique market and leaving small dependent vendors without reliable income.

    This case, Bruce argued, demonstrates how poorly managed live exports can undermine local enterprise and food security when domestic production levels are already limited. “This is not something that I believe that we could sustain at this point in time,” he added.

    In place of unprocessed live exports, the ministry is advancing a new abattoir-centered development model that is designed to guarantee consistent, high-quality meat for local consumers, while creating a framework for future regulated exports of processed meat to regional and international markets. The planned abattoir will also support stronger traceability systems to combat livestock theft, and reinforce the viability of the local livestock economy and organized producer groups.

    Bruce told listeners he has already held productive consultations with the national Butchers’ Association, and most recently met with the Cattle Farmers and Producers Association of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (CFPA), where the suspension of live shipments to Grenada was a central topic of discussion.

    “An abattoir is not just a facility where we bring the animals for slaughter,” Bruce said. “It is a facility that will guarantee us standards of the meat that goes out into the marketplace for local consumption, and, if we verge into the regional and international market, it will be a facility that helps us to support our own production on the ground.”

    He added that the regulated slaughter process required by the new abattoir will also severely disrupt illegal livestock theft networks: by centralizing legal slaughter and sales, it will become far harder for thieves to offload stolen animals to legitimate buyers. “It will threaten praedial larceny,” Bruce noted.

    The minister confirmed that a formal proposal for the new abattoir will be submitted to Cabinet for review in the coming weeks, as the cornerstone of the government’s planned livestock sector restructuring.

    The pause on live exports is just one component of a broader, multi-pronged government strategy to tackle persistent praedial larceny, a problem that Bruce said has steadily eroded farmer livelihoods across the country. He disclosed that ongoing inter-ministerial talks are underway between the Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of National Security to speed up full implementation of the existing Praedial Larceny Act, which he said has been poorly enforced for years.

    The government is also currently waiting on input from a local private sector firm on specialized farm monitoring technology and equipment that can help identify and track thieves operating on agricultural lands. Additionally, a new national traceability law, which will first apply to livestock and later be expanded to crop production, is currently under review by the Attorney General’s office. The legislation will enable full tracking of animals through every stage of the supply chain, eliminating the grey market that allows stolen livestock to be sold illegally.

    Bruce emphasized that the rising rate of farm theft across the country is rooted in weak enforcement of existing regulations, not a lack of policy. “One of the fundamental challenges that we have … is that the thievery that is happening on your farms is because there has been a slacking or a lacking of the enforcement of the praedial larceny act,” he said.

    The minister reiterated his election campaign promise to crack down on agricultural crime, telling listeners: “I told the thieves during the election campaign that with a New Democratic Party government elected and myself being appointed Minister of Agriculture, I will make restless the praedial larcenists. The journey has begun.”

    Once the new abattoir and national traceability system are fully implemented, Bruce said, the reforms will protect both law-abiding farmers and legitimate meat traders by closing off illegal markets for stolen animals: “the thief will have nobody to sell the stolen animals to.”

  • Column: De rechtsstaat kan niet met reces

    Column: De rechtsstaat kan niet met reces

    A strong rule of law is not built on empty rhetoric about judicial independence. It is reinforced when the judiciary has enough qualified judicial officers, those officers can carry out their work free from external pressure, and the state guarantees proper working and compensation conditions. At a moment when tensions between branches of government are already running high in Suriname, an entirely avoidable crisis is now looming over the expansion of the country’s judicial system.

    Fifteen new judges have already been selected from a pool of 75 applicants. After completing a costly, rigorous RAIO training program, these candidates are fully prepared to assume their judicial duties. They have even been assigned to court rosters for sessions scheduled to begin in October. However, their formal presidential appointment has not been finalized, and no definitive agreement has been reached on their compensation packages.

    These new judges are urgently needed to strengthen Suriname’s overstretched judiciary, cut through crippling case backlogs, and reduce unsustainable workloads for sitting judges. Vice President Gregory Rusland informed the National Assembly that he signed the official notification letter on July 30 to clear the way for preparations to deploy the new judges starting in October, a move that suggested the process was nearly complete. But the critical presidential decree required to formalize their appointments has not yet been issued.

    Simultaneously, Suriname’s parliament is debating a proposed amendment to the Judicial Financial Provisions Act, which aims to overhaul the country’s controversial existing system of base salaries, periodic pay increases, and benefits. While all parties agree that reform is necessary, negotiations have stalled over the exact structure of the new compensation framework. Ideally, clarity on this issue would have been reached before the 15 new judges were selected and trained, leaving candidates to wonder what financial terms they will face when they start their judicial careers.

    Proposed base salaries for the new judges range from 60,000 to 80,000 Surinamese dollars, a figure that does not include additional benefits and allowances that make up total income. Even so, the base salary level matters. Society expects judges to uphold independence, integrity, legal expertise, and impartiality; they are granted the power to rule on citizens’ freedom, property, and fundamental human rights. A fair, dignified employment status is a non-negotiable requirement for upholding these standards.

    This question of judicial compensation is particularly urgent as Suriname stands on the cusp of major oil and gas development. International energy companies, global financial institutions, top law firms, and other private sector actors are already competing to hire highly qualified Surinamese legal professionals. If the state invests significant public funds to select and train 15 skilled judges, but fails to offer them competitive, attractive employment terms, it should not be surprised if the private sector lures these new jurists away. That would leave public investment wasted and the judiciary still short of the judges it desperately needs.

    Time is running out fast. The National Assembly is scheduled to enter recess on September 3, and the original plan called for debating and passing the Judicial Financial Provisions Act amendment before recess begins. With the limited time remaining and ongoing negotiations still required to resolve disagreements, meeting that deadline looks increasingly unlikely. This creates a deeply problematic situation: 15 judges have been fully trained, the judiciary recognizes their urgent need, they are scheduled to start work in October and already assigned to court rosters, but their formal appointments and compensation terms remain unresolved.

    No one disputes that the excesses of the current compensation system need correction. The explanatory note to the proposed amendment explicitly states that the reform is intended to prevent the total compensation of senior magistrates from exceeding that of the President of the Republic. But correcting past excesses does not require swinging to the opposite extreme. A balanced middle ground is achievable: a fair, transparent compensation structure that matches the responsibility and independence of the judicial role, without letting periodic increments and benefits accumulate uncontrollably.

    The executive branch, parliament, and judiciary must break this deadlock immediately. This issue is not a suitable arena for political power games: too much is at stake for Suriname’s rule of law. If the 15 new judges are needed to start work in October, their appointments and employment terms must be finalized properly and on time.

    October is rapidly approaching, and the 15 trained candidates are ready to serve. All the preliminary procedural steps to add them to court rosters are complete, but disagreements over their starting terms continue to hold up the process. Much of the chaos surrounding leaked drafts and unsubmitted draft amendments ultimately boils down to disagreements over funding.

    But funding disagreements should not be allowed to prevent 15 urgently needed judges from taking office on time. Suriname’s rule of law is far too important to be put at risk over this avoidable impasse.

  • Fidel, maker of dreams and feats

    Fidel, maker of dreams and feats

    On August 25, 2026, Cuban state newspaper Granma published the full prologue written by Army General Raúl Castro Ruz, leader of the Cuban Revolution, for the forthcoming complete collection of *Selected Works of Fidel Castro Ruz* — Raúl’s elder brother, lifelong comrade-in-arms, and the undisputed leader of Cuba’s revolutionary movement. For Raúl, penning this introduction is not merely a literary task, but the highest honor of his life, a journey through decades of shared struggle that brings every moment alongside Fidel rushing back as if no time had passed at all.

    Raúl traces their bond back to their childhood together at La Salle School in Santiago de Cuba, when Fidel first emerged as his role model and lifelong mentor. It was Fidel who gave Raúl his first political text, Friedrich Engels’ *The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State*, and recommended further readings that clarified the questions shaping young Raúl’s emerging worldview. When Fidel graduated from law school, he encouraged their parents to let Raúl join him in Havana to continue his university studies, setting Raúl on the path that would define the rest of his life.

    In the early 1950s, Fidel first entered political life, running for a seat as a representative for Havana’s Cayo Hueso neighborhood, holding out hope that Cuba’s dire poverty and foreign domination could be transformed through constitutional channels. That hope collapsed with Fulgencio Batista’s coup d’état on March 10, 1952. Fidel immediately denounced the illegal power grab, filing an unconstitutionality motion with Havana’s Emergency Court and publishing the article *Revolution Not, a Coup* to expose the criminal nature of Batista’s regime, which would only worsen Cuba’s crisis. Months later, on the 100th anniversary of independence leader José Martí’s birth, Fidel led more than 1,000 disciplined young activists in the iconic March of the Torches, a public demonstration that announced the arrival of a new generation of revolutionary resistance.

    By that point, Fidel had already spent a year uniting progressive Orthodox youth into a cohesive underground movement, laying the groundwork for armed resistance. His famous framework — that “we need to start a small engine to help start the big one” — set the stage for the 1953 assault on the Moncada Barracks: the “small engine” that would ignite a nationwide popular uprising armed with weapons seized from the regime. As Raúl once noted, where Karl Marx described the Paris Commune as revolutionaries “ready to storm heaven,” the young rebels of Moncada, armed only with bird-hunting shotguns, “tried to take heaven by surprise.”

    After the assault failed, Batista’s dictatorship unleashed brutal repression against the newly formed July 26th Movement. The surviving rebels were convicted in show trials stripped of any constitutional guarantees; Fidel, recovering from injuries, was tried alone in a small room at Santiago de Cuba’s Saturnino Lora Hospital. There, he turned his trial defense into a searing indictment of the Batista regime, and his closing argument *History Will Absolve Me* became the foundational political program of the Cuban Revolution. Few could have imagined that the words of a prisoner, tried in secret to silence him, would one day become the guiding law of a new Cuban nation built for the working people.

    Twenty-two months into their imprisonment, popular pressure forced the dictatorship to offer amnesty — but Batista demanded the rebels renounce armed struggle to win release. Fidel refused outright, declaring from prison: “We do not want amnesty at the price of dishonor.” When an unconditional pardon was finally granted in May 1955, Fidel immediately set to work organizing a new clandestine resistance, educating the Cuban masses on the inevitability of revolutionary war. Mexico became the movement’s exile refuge, where the rebels lived in rough makeshift training camps, combining military drills with deep study of Cuban history and global political thought.

    In December 1956, honoring Fidel’s pledge of “be free or martyrs,” the rebels landed on Cuba’s coast aboard the yacht Granma. After days of harassment by Batista’s forces and a devastating defeat at Alegría de Pío, the surviving fighters regrouped with Fidel at Cinco Palmas, a remote outpost in the foothills of the Sierra Maestra. Just eight combatants remained, with only seven rifles between them. Yet Fidel, whose unshakable confidence in victory never wavered, declared simply: “Now we will win the war!” It was Fidel’s revolutionary genius that turned that ragged, exhausted group of fighters into the victorious Rebel Army that would topple Batista’s dictatorship. Raúl never ceased to admire Fidel’s courage, his ability to anticipate enemy strategy, and his bold vision for expanding guerrilla fronts across the island’s central and western regions, a plan he shared with Raúl in 1957 that proved decisive to the revolution’s eventual success.

    Fidel’s humanity and commitment to justice were as legendary as his military skill. No loss moved him deeper than the death of a comrade at the hands of the dictatorship; when dissident leader Frank País García was assassinated, Fidel railed, “What monsters! They don’t know the intelligence, the character, the integrity they have murdered!”

    Raúl emphasizes that Fidel combined rare gifts: he was both a brilliant military tactician and a visionary political leader, deeply rooted in the needs of the Cuban people. No account of the Rebel Army’s victorious campaign can ignore Fidel’s central role. During Batista’s 1958 Summer Offensive, a small, ragtag rebel force with inferior weaponry and no formal military backing defeated a government force 30 to 50 times larger in men and equipment. That victory, Raúl argues, stemmed entirely from Fidel’s wise leadership and his core conviction that ideas are the most powerful moral force in the world.

    Five years, five months, and five days after the Moncada assault, on January 1, 1959, the revolution won power — and from its earliest days, Fidel held firm to the promise he made at his 1953 trial: the revolution existed solely to serve the Cuban people. The new revolutionary government immediately reclaimed national sovereignty, which had been eroded by U.S. intervention since 1898, and implemented sweeping pro-popular reforms: rent cuts, reduced utility rates, affordable housing programs, and most transformative of all, the Agrarian Reform Law that broke up large landholdings and distributed land to the peasants who worked it. These measures, paired with the nationalization of foreign-owned corporations, cleared the path for Cuba’s socialist project, led unwaveringly by Fidel.

    Over the following decades, Fidel led Cuba through every turning point of its revolutionary history: he proclaimed the revolution’s socialist character in April 1961, and weeks later personally led Cuban forces to defeat a U.S.-backed invasion at the Bay of Pigs, handing Yankee imperialism its first major military defeat in Latin America. That same year, Cuba declared itself a territory free of illiteracy, a historic achievement delivered by Cuban youth answering Fidel’s call. During the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, Fidel demonstrated remarkable statesmanship defending the revolution’s core principles. In 1965, he oversaw the founding of the first Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba, and was elected First Secretary in recognition of his service. That same night, he read Che Guevara’s final farewell letter to the party, honoring Che as a symbol of the highest human values for all Cuban revolutionaries.

    Fidel dedicated his life to international solidarity and anti-imperialist struggle, fighting against colonialism, apartheid, and foreign domination, and advancing the emancipation and dignity of oppressed nations across the globe. His commitment to working-class power and proletarian internationalism remains a touchstone for Cuba’s revolutionary movement today. When the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc collapsed in 1989, Fidel warned of the coming turmoil but publicly affirmed that Cuba would never abandon the banner of socialism. When global commentators predicted Cuba’s revolution would collapse in the 1990s Special Period, Fidel’s leadership and his deep connection to the Cuban people allowed the country to preserve the core gains of the revolution, from universal healthcare to free education. Later that decade, when the United States launched a new aggressive offensive against Cuba, Fidel led a successful strategic counteroffensive to defend the revolution.

    Fidel refined Cuba’s doctrine of People’s War, building on Martí’s maxim that “trenches of ideas are worth more than trenches of stone,” deepening and expanding Cuban military theory more than any leader before him. His campaigns to win the return of six-year-old Elián González from the United States and the release of the Cuban Five imprisoned in the U.S. demonstrated his skill as a political strategist, his unwavering belief in Cuban unity, and his certainty that justice would prevail. He proved that even under the weight of a more than 60-year U.S. economic, commercial, and financial blockade, Cuba could make transformative progress in education, healthcare, culture, and cutting-edge fields like genetic engineering and biotechnology. He taught Cubans to turn limited resources into strength, to outthink superior military power with intelligence, and to never surrender their principles in the face of overwhelming force.

    Even as a staunch anti-imperialist, Fidel was willing to pursue dialogue and cooperation with the United States and other capitalist countries, rooted in mutual respect for Cuban sovereignty. He never failed to recognize the decency of the American people, and expressed solidarity with them during moments of crisis. On the global stage, he was a leading voice for Third World nations, defending global peace, the right to development, and denouncing imperialism, the global arms race, and the illegitimacy of unpayable Third World external debt. He transformed the Non-Aligned Movement into a powerful force for peace and conflict mediation, and was one of the earliest global leaders to warn that delaying action on climate protection would threaten the survival of the entire human species.

    As a revolutionary humanist who rejected personal wealth, Fidel lived his solidarity: he donated his own blood to disaster victims, led relief efforts for communities hit by hurricanes, floods, and earthquakes, and taught Cubans that solidarity means sharing what little you have, not just what you have in excess. He was a lifelong advocate for Latin American and Caribbean unity, and found a close comrade in Venezuelan leader Hugo Chávez, whose political potential he recognized long before Chávez became a global revolutionary icon. Together, they worked tirelessly to turn their shared vision of regional integration into reality.

    Even when his health declined in his later years, Fidel continued to share his wisdom with the Cuban people, working until his final days as a “soldier of ideas,” a researcher, and an advocate for sustainable food production for both people and animals. Fidel insisted that his memory never be used to build a cult of personality, Raúl recalls; the only proper monument to his work is continuing the struggle to make his vision a reality, under the unified leadership of the Communist Party of Cuba. He expressed unwavering confidence in Cuban youth, and left a legacy of personal example and unshakable will that empowers new generations to achieve what once seemed impossible. That legacy unites Cubans today, and forms an impenetrable bulwark against efforts to destroy the revolution.

    The *Selected Works of Fidel Castro Ruz* collected in 23 volumes brings together 690 texts: speeches, interviews, articles, reflections, prologues, and other materials, including some never before published or rarely seen. The final volume closes with a tribute to Fidel’s deep friendship with Chávez, whom Fidel called “the best friend the Cuban people ever had.” The collection demonstrates Fidel’s extraordinary gifts as a communicator: a profound, passionate orator who could captivate crowds of thousands. It stands as a critical piece of Cuba’s national historical memory, covering every pivotal event of the revolution, though Raúl acknowledges it cannot capture every word Fidel ever spoke. Even so, it will serve as an essential resource for generations to come to understand Fidel’s thought, life, work, and example, and it highlights how much more remains to be studied about the epic of the Cuban Revolution and its global impact. The team that compiled the collection credits the work as a masterclass in revolutionary thought, and Raúl notes that the next critical step is the publication of Fidel’s complete works by the Fidel Castro Ruz Center, an urgent project to preserve Cuba’s national historical memory.

    For current and future generations, Raúl writes, these works are an inexhaustible resource: they help explain the crises of the modern world, and provide a powerful weapon to defend Cuba, carrying forward the unyielding spirit of Cuban independence hero Antonio Maceo, who declared that any who try to seize Cuba will “reap the dust of its soil soaked in blood, if they do not perish in the struggle.”

    Closing the prologue, Raúl writes: “Infinite thanks, Fidel, for your teachings and example. With you, we reaffirm the commitment you instilled in us: Homeland or Death! We shall overcome! Always onward to victory!”

  • Parmessar: Behandeling wetswijziging rechterlijke macht vóór reces lijkt moeilijk haalbaar

    Parmessar: Behandeling wetswijziging rechterlijke macht vóór reces lijkt moeilijk haalbaar

    A planned overhaul of Suriname’s Judicial Branch Financial Provisions Act is facing growing delays, and is now increasingly unlikely to be finalized and voted on before the National Assembly enters its recess on September 3, according to the head of the country’s main opposition National Democratic Party (NDP).

    Rabin Parmessar, who leads the NDP parliamentary caucus and also chairs the special committee of rapporteurs overseeing the bill, told local outlet Starnieuws that while initial planning called for the full legislative process to wrap up before the recess break, ongoing discussions have revealed there is still far more work to be done to get the text right.

    Parmessar emphasized that any changes to this law, which governs the core framework for the judicial branch, must be handled responsibly, with full respect for the separation of powers between Suriname’s state institutions. With less than two weeks remaining before the recess begins, the timeline for advancing the bill before the break is now looking increasingly unfeasible.

    The holdup on the legislation carries tangible real-world consequences: 15 newly trained judges are ready to take their seats on the bench to ease existing caseload burdens across Suriname’s court system, and court administration has already assigned them to court sessions set to begin when the new judicial term opens in October. However, their formal appointment process remains incomplete, in large part because the salary regime that will apply to these new magistrates is still tied up in the proposed law changes.

    The candidates have already completed all required training, and their arrival is widely viewed as a critical step to address long-standing high workloads and expand judicial capacity to reduce case backlogs. The Council of Ministers has already signed off on their appointments, but the final presidential resolution formalizing their roles has not yet been issued, pending resolution of the salary framework question.

    At the heart of the legislative debate is the restructuring of judicial pay, a core component of the proposed amendments. The existing salary system has faced criticism in recent years over its structure of incremental pay increases and multiple allowances, which over time have driven total judicial compensation far higher than initial budget projections, creating long-term fiscal sustainability concerns.

    The revision proposal adjusts a range of percentage-based pay scales overhauls how incremental pay increases are structured, with the explicit goal of creating a new salary framework that is more financially manageable for the state budget. Until the law amendment is finalized, there remains no definitive clarity on which pay scheme will apply to the 15 incoming judges. While it remains legally possible to appoint the judges under current law, the unresolved compensation question has put the entire process on hold.

  • Pokie wil in 2027 af van achterstanden sociale uitkeringen

    Pokie wil in 2027 af van achterstanden sociale uitkeringen

    Suriname’s Ministry of Social Affairs and Housing (Sozavo) has laid out an ambitious two-part reform agenda: clearing the persistent backlog of unpaid social benefit claims by 2027 and transitioning the country away from costly cash-based disbursements to a fully digital payment system for all social transfers. Minister Diana Pokie, who leads Sozavo, confirmed the 2027 deadline in an official statement shared via the Communication Service of Suriname, noting that the original one-year timeline for clearing backlogs could not be met due to funding dependencies on the Ministry of Finance and Planning.

    Cash disbursements, currently still the norm for remote inland districts including Brokopondo and Sipaliwini, have been identified as a key barrier to resolving backlogs. Minister Pokie explained that cash payments carry exorbitantly high operational costs, which have compounded delays and made it impossible to clear the accumulated backlog at the current pace. In all other Surinamese districts, social benefits are already distributed via the Monikarta payment card system, a shift that has already streamlined processes in those regions.

    To deliver a nationwide digital solution, Sozavo has partnered with the Suriname Post Savings Bank (SPSB) to develop a countrywide digital payment infrastructure that will reach even the most remote inland communities. Preparations for breaking the country’s long-standing reliance on cash culture are already far advanced, Pokie confirmed, with the end goal of routing nearly all social benefit disbursements through direct bank transfers and other formal digital payment methods.

    The reform also includes a restructuring of Monikarta distribution. Sozavo has signed a new agreement with SPSB that will transfer full responsibility for issuing new cards to the bank moving forward. The ministry will run one final round of distribution for individuals who have not yet collected their pre-issued cards, after which all remaining unclaimed cards will be handed over to SPSB for future distribution. Pokie noted that turnout for recent outreach campaigns urging uncollected card holders to claim their cards has been disappointingly low, prompting the ministry to explore new outreach strategies including targeted social media campaigns to reach this demographic.

    Longer-term modernization plans also extend to the application process for social benefits. Currently, all applications for support schemes including disability assistance, aid for low-income households, and purchasing power enhancement must be submitted in person through local Sozavo neighborhood offices, with separate registration periods scheduled for inland residents. The full digitalization of the entire benefit pipeline, from application to disbursement, is expected to create a far more efficient system that will prevent future backlogs from accumulating and expand access to support for all eligible Surinamese residents.

  • BRA to reissue 25 807 land tax bills

    BRA to reissue 25 807 land tax bills

    On Monday, Barbados’ Minister of Finance Ryan Straughn publicly confirmed a miscalculation in residential land tax bills that has impacted 25,807 residential properties assessed at values above $450,000, following a recent adjustment to the country’s property tax-free threshold. The mistake stemmed from a failure to update progressive tax bands after policymakers raised the tax-exempt threshold for residential real estate from $300,000 to $400,000 earlier this year, leaving affected property owners facing incorrectly inflated tax charges.

    Speaking at a press conference hosted at the Barbados Revenue Authority (BRA) headquarters on Roebuck Street, Straughn laid out the corrected progressive tax structure that will apply to all residential land tax calculations moving forward. To eliminate any confusion, he clarified that the updated bands are structured as follows: 0% tax on the improved property value up to $400,000, 0.1% on any value portion falling between $400,001 and $550,000, 0.7% on the portion between $550,001 and $950,000, and a 1% rate for any value above $950,000.

    Straughn emphasized that the error only impacts properties valued above $450,000; more than 62,000 residential properties assessed between $400,000 and $450,000 were calculated correctly under the new threshold, and their bills will not need to be reissued. Explaining the root cause of the administrative mistake, the minister noted that when the tax-free threshold was raised from $300,000 to $400,000, the remaining taxable bands were not shifted upward automatically as required under the new policy. Under the old threshold, the first taxable bracket ran from $300,001 to $450,000 at the 0.1% rate. After the threshold adjustment, this initial taxable bracket should have expanded to cover from $400,001 to $550,000 — a $150,000 range — but instead only covered $50,000, pushing the higher 0.7% rate into effect thousands of dollars earlier than it should have, resulting in overbilling.

    The minister acknowledged that the error has caused unnecessary inconvenience for affected property owners, confirming that BRA teams have already identified the issue and are working at full speed to resolve it. To prevent the same administrative error from happening again in the future, Straughn announced that new programming protocols will be implemented to automatically adjust tax bands whenever the tax-free threshold is modified in upcoming policy adjustments. “Going forward, we will continue to review our property tax framework,” he said. “The reality is that the bands really should have been programmed automatically to shift with threshold changes from the start, so any future adjustments will include this automatic update to make tax calculations as seamless as possible for property owners.”

    In addition to correcting the billing error, the government has adjusted payment deadlines to give affected homeowners extra time to settle their corrected obligations. Land tax is typically due by March 31 of each year, but corrected bills for impacted properties will carry an issue date of August 31, with extended discount deadlines aligned to 2026. The revised timeline offers a 10% discount for in-person payments completed by September 30, 2026, a 5% discount for in-person payments made by October 30, 2026, and a 10% discount for all online payments and bank transfers submitted by December 1, 2026.

    Importantly, the correction applies exclusively to residential properties; all non-residential land tax calculations remain unaffected by the error. For homeowners who have already paid their incorrectly inflated tax bills, BRA will open refund requests starting September 1. Eligible property owners can choose to receive a cash refund for their net overpayment, request that the overpaid amount be credited to their 2027 land tax obligation, or apply the extra funds to cover any existing outstanding tax arrears.

    As of the announcement, Straughn confirmed that BRA has already received $35.9 million in payments from affected taxpayers, but he noted that this total is not the total amount eligible for refund. The final overpayment sum will depend on how many taxpayers opt for refunds versus credits toward future tax bills. Corrected paper bills are currently in production, and the Barbados Post Office is scheduled to begin distributing them to affected homeowners before the end of August.

    Trevor Forde, BRA’s Director of Tax Audit and Compliance, encouraged all residential property owners to register for the BRA online portal to access their updated tax information faster. Homeowners can use their existing bill number and map reference number from a previous land tax statement to log into the portal and view their corrected bill immediately, without waiting for the paper copy to arrive by post. Forde also reminded taxpayers that online payments qualify for the maximum 10% discount, making digital payment both faster and more cost-effective for property owners.

  • Bus Shutdown Averted, But for How Long?

    Bus Shutdown Averted, But for How Long?

    A looming total shutdown of public bus services across Belize has been temporarily avoided, after the Belize Bus Association (BBA) agreed to hold off on its planned service disruption to give national authorities additional time to craft a policy response to crippling rising diesel prices.

    The standoff between bus operators and the government stretches back to mid-July, when the BBA first notified the Ministry of Transport that operators were facing existential financial pressures following the expiration of the national fuel subsidy. As diesel costs continued to soar over subsequent weeks, operators warned that continued operations had become financially unsustainable, and announced plans to suspend all services to press their demands for government intervention.

    In an official statement released on August 24, 2026, the BBA confirmed that its members had unanimously voted to pause the planned shutdown after Transport Minister requested extra time to advance the issue to the national Cabinet. The statement explained that the minister has scheduled to table a policy paper outlining potential solutions for Cabinet consideration on September 1, 2026.

    “In the interest of the thousands of Belizeans who depend upon public transportation every day, our members have unanimously agreed to make this additional sacrifice,” the BBA’s statement read.

    While the immediate disruption that would have upended daily commutes for working people, students and travelers across the Belize District has been averted, the association has made clear that the truce remains temporary. The BBA emphasized that it is waiting for a definitive, actionable solution from Cabinet when the body takes up the issue next month, with no guarantee of further extensions if no meaningful progress is delivered.

  • PSU Challenges PM’s Consultation Claims on Controversial Bill

    PSU Challenges PM’s Consultation Claims on Controversial Bill

    On August 24, 2026, a deep public rift has opened between Belize’s government led by Prime Minister John Briceño and the nation’s Public Service Union (PSU) over the controversial Revenue Authority Bill, with both sides offering contradictory accounts of how much stakeholder consultation was held before the legislation advanced to the Senate.

    Prime Minister Briceño has publicly maintained that the PSU was given extensive opportunities to provide input and help shape the structure of the bill throughout its drafting process. But PSU President Dean Flowers is pushing back hard against those claims, saying that any substantive dialogue between the union and government collapsed after a deeply unsatisfactory meeting held on May 19. According to Flowers, the government failed to follow through on a key commitment to establish a cross-stakeholder steering committee that would oversee ongoing consultations on the legislation.

    In a public statement setting out the union’s version of events, Flowers detailed the timeline of negotiations: the PSU submitted a comprehensive position paper outlining its vision for the new Superintendence of the Revenue Authority (SARA), including what the body’s mandate and structure should entail. The government called the union to a consultation meeting in May, but Flowers says that no government official at the gathering was able to answer basic questions about the proposed legislation. Crucially, Flowers notes that the full draft text of the bill was never shared with union representatives before the meeting, with officials only presenting a general PowerPoint overview of the proposal.

    Flowers added that while an initial draft terms of reference for the promised project steering committee was presented at that May meeting, the committee has never convened for a single working session. Neither side has ever reached a formal agreement on the committee’s operating terms of reference, he confirmed. Calling the government’s rush to advance the bill premature, Flowers went so far as to accuse ruling party officials of acting like dictators in pushing the legislation forward without addressing stakeholder concerns.

    Despite the union’s strenuous objections, the Revenue Authority Bill has already cleared a critical legislative milestone: following a tense debate, members of the Belizean National Assembly approved the bill, moving it to the Senate for the next round of review and approval. During the National Assembly debate, Opposition Leader Tracy Panton raised major red flags over the bill’s ambiguous language around the role of the new revenue authority’s advisory board. Section 55 of the legislation states the board will be responsible for providing policy advice and recommendations, but explicitly bars it from exercising any executive, operational, or supervisory decision-making authority over the revenue authority, its CEO, or other senior leaders. Panton said this vague separation of powers creates unacceptable uncertainty around the body’s governance.

    Prime Minister Briceño defended the advisory board structure during the debate, arguing that the design is intentional to remove political influence from tax administration. Briceño explained that by restricting the board to an advisory role, the government aims to prevent political appointees from pressuring revenue officials to target or exempt individuals and businesses for political reasons. He noted that taxation is an inherently sensitive issue for the public, and many Belizeans already hold anxiety around the tax system even when they are fully compliant with the law. The prime minister emphasized that the structure is meant to reassure the Belizean public and the broader business community that the new authority will operate free of political interference as much as possible.

    Now, as the bill heads to the Senate, the PSU is launching a lobbying campaign to convince independent senators and opposition members to block the legislation’s passage. If the bill ultimately receives Senate approval and becomes law, the union has pledged to mobilize its thousands of member public workers to push for changes to the legislation. In an official release published on August 24, the PSU called on the government to revisit the legislation, address the union’s outstanding concerns, and ensure that the final version of the bill creates a revenue authority that meets core standards of accountability, transparency, professional governance, and robust checks and balances. This story remains ongoing, and further updates will be provided as new developments emerge.

  • WIN, APNU yet to reach agreement on joint statement

    WIN, APNU yet to reach agreement on joint statement

    On Monday, 24 August 2026, two of Guyana’s leading opposition political groups — A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) and We Invest in Nationhood (WIN) — convened a closed-door negotiating session that concluded without final agreements on the high-stakes issues that had prompted the gathering, and no date has been scheduled for a follow-up round of talks as of Monday evening.

    The meeting grew out of a public disagreement that erupted after WIN, led by Opposition Leader Azruddin Mohamed, submitted nominees for Guyana’s Local Government Commission (LGC), the body tasked with hiring, disciplining, and terminating staff for municipal and local councils across the country, that excluded all APNU picks. APNU, which holds 12 seats in parliament, is demanding at least one seat on the commission, arguing that the allocation should reflect its proportional representation in national and local legislative bodies. Mohamed instead put forward two WIN members and one nominee from the single-seat Forward Guyana Movement.

    In addition to the LGC nomination dispute, Monday’s talks were scheduled to address several other long-running points of contention between the two opposition blocs. These included WIN’s year-old demand that APNU-affiliated commissioners step down from the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) to make space for WIN representation, the deadlocked leadership election for the Region 10 (Upper Demerara-Upper Berbice) Council, and protocols for hiring party scrutineers paid by GECOM. WIN currently holds a tied vote for the region’s top council positions and is pushing for a new council meeting to break the impasse.

    Despite more than eight hours passing after the session wrapped, party representatives had still not finalized the text of a promised joint public statement on the meeting’s outcome by Monday evening. Speaking to reporters after exiting the less-than-one-hour talks, both leaders confirmed that none of the core disputed issues were actually addressed during the meeting.

    “We had no discussions on the way forward with the Local Government Commission and GECOM issue so we will be issuing a joint statement. Dialogue will continue,” Mohamed told reporters. He added that both delegations need to return to their internal party caucuses to align on negotiating positions before advancing discussions on the major issues. He noted that Monday’s session focused instead on drafting the joint statement, agreeing to terms of reference for future talks, and discussing a potential future memorandum of understanding between the two groups.

    APNU Chairman and PNCR (People’s National Congress Reform, APNU’s core member party) leader Aubrey Norton echoed Mohamed’s comments, saying that the two sides had agreed in principle to develop a formal guiding framework for future negotiations before tackling the substantive disputes. “I know in principle, we have agreed that we will work out a clear approach to moving forward,” Norton said, describing the meeting itself as “cordial.” He emphasized that formal frameworks are a necessary foundation for serious negotiations: “When you’re in serious negotiations, you need to have clear principles, a clear framework to be guided.”

    Demerara Waves Online News confirmed Monday evening that PNCR General Secretary Sherwin Benjamin and his WIN counterpart had still not reached consensus on the wording of the joint statement hours after the meeting ended. Shortly after 7:30 p.m., APNU parliamentarian and Working People’s Alliance (WPA) leader Dr. Hinds acknowledged on his social media program *Politics 101* that a joint statement would be released later that evening, but declined to share details of the meeting’s outcome.

    Dr. Hinds also noted that a small minority of political actors have opposed any formal talks between WIN and APNU, but added that the broad base of voters who supported both blocs share a strong opposition to the ruling People’s Progressive Party (PPP). “One thing that is certain is that the critical mass of persons who voted for WIN and the 12-seat APNU, they have a very healthy dislike for the PPP,” he said.

    As of the latest update on Monday evening, no date had been announced for the next round of negotiations between the two opposition groups.

  • ERC calls for revocation of Ian Douglas’ appointment as Ambassador to Cuba citing breach of protocol

    ERC calls for revocation of Ian Douglas’ appointment as Ambassador to Cuba citing breach of protocol

    A major political advocacy group in Dominica has launched a formal demand for the immediate removal of a high-ranking diplomatic representative, triggering a debate over compliance with international diplomatic norms and public accountability in Caribbean politics.

    In an official media statement released on August 24, 2026, the Electoral Reform Coalition (ERC) called on Dominican President Sylvanie Burton and Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit to revoke Ian Douglas’ appointment as the country’s Resident Ambassador to Cuba and withdraw his diplomatic credentials. The coalition’s core allegation centers on Douglas’ dual role: the ambassador is currently serving as campaign manager for Ashma McDougall, the Dominica Labour Party (DLP) candidate running in the upcoming Roseau North constituency by-election.

    The ERC argues that Douglas’ active involvement in partisan political activity directly contradicts the long-standing principle of diplomatic neutrality enshrined in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, the foundational international agreement governing diplomatic conduct. The organization outlined four key concerns to back its demand, starting with a clear breach of standard diplomatic protocols that bar sitting state representatives from engaging in partisan domestic campaigning.

    A second critical issue raised is extended absenteeism from the ambassador’s post in Havana. According to the ERC, Douglas has not carried out his official diplomatic duties for roughly six months. This prolonged absence has created gaps in consular support for Dominican students and residents living in Cuba, a situation the coalition calls unacceptable at a time when consistent diplomatic engagement and cross-border cooperation remain critical.

    Third, the ERC questions the ethical use of public funds. As a serving ambassador, Douglas draws a full state salary funded by Dominican taxpayers. His reported full-time work as a political campaign strategist, the coalition maintains, raises urgent questions about whether public resources are being misused for partisan political ends.

    The coalition also leveled sharp criticism at candidate Ashma McDougall for her response to questions about Douglas’ dual role, first raised in an on-camera interview with Emonews. A widely circulated Facebook video of the interview shows McDougall telling reporters she has no reservations about Douglas holding both roles simultaneously. She praised Douglas’ extensive expertise on Dominican politics, noting his insights have been “invaluable” and “immeasurable” to her campaign.

    When the reporter pressed McDougall on evidence that the dual appointment violates multiple diplomatic rules, the candidate declined to directly address the concern. The ERC slammed her response as a blatant failure to uphold standards of public accountability and institutional integrity, describing it as “shameful, disappointing, pathetic, and opportunistic.” The coalition emphasized that McDougall’s reaction prioritized her personal political ambition over commitments to government transparency and institutional norms.

    Beyond the specific case of Douglas, the ERC warns that his continued service undermines the nonpartisan integrity of the diplomatic corps, and casts broader doubt on the Dominican government’s commitment to upholding international conventions, the rule of law, and public trust in state institutions. The group stresses that recalling Douglas and revoking his credentials is a necessary step to defend the country’s national reputation and demonstrate respect for its binding international diplomatic obligations.

    As of the time this report went to press, neither Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit nor President Sylvanie Burton has issued any public comment in response to the ERC’s demand.