作者: admin

  • Govt defends migration policy at UN forum

    Govt defends migration policy at UN forum

    Just days after facing heated parliamentary pushback over its controversial planned immigration overhauls, Barbados’ government has carried its policy argument to the global stage, telling a key United Nations gathering that strategic migration management is non-negotiable for the small island nation’s economic survival amid cascading demographic decline, workforce contraction and accelerating climate change pressures.

    Speaking at the Second International Migration Review Forum in New York, Barbados’ Minister of Home Affairs Gregory Nicholls framed migration as a core development strategy rather than a policy challenge for small island developing states (SIDS) grappling with widespread labor gaps, aging populations and climate-driven instability. The quadrennial forum serves as the UN’s flagship global convening, bringing together governments, civil society and private sector stakeholders to evaluate progress on the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, share lessons from implementation hurdles, and align on future commitments to improve global migration governance.

    “Migration, managed well, is not a burden. It is an engine for creativity, innovation and growth,” Nicholls told assembled delegates in his address.

    His comments came on the heels of a fiercely contested debate in Barbados’ House of Assembly over proposed updates to the country’s immigration and citizenship legislation, which the administration has positioned as a critical response to years of population shrinkage, high rates of outward migration among skilled workers, and growing strain on the domestic labor market. During the parliamentary debate, Nicholls emphasized that Barbados’ shrinking and rapidly aging population poses an existential threat to long-term economic growth, the long-term solvency of the national pension system, and the country’s ability to compete in the global tourism and digital services sectors.

    Expanding on that framing for the international audience, Nicholls stressed that for SIDS, climate change and migration are inextricably linked policy priorities, not separate issues. “For small island developing states, climate change and migration are not parallel agendas – they are the same agenda,” he said.

    Nicholls also used the UN platform to highlight Barbados’ recent progress advancing regional integration through a landmark free movement agreement launched last October with three other Caribbean nations: Belize, Dominica, and St Vincent and the Grenadines. The pact grants citizens of all participating states the right to live and work without time limits across member territories, while guaranteeing equal access to public healthcare and primary and secondary education for migrant workers’ children. “This is not generosity. It is obligation built on political will, regional solidarity and human rights,” Nicholls said of the agreement.

    Barbados is also currently developing a comprehensive national migration policy aligned with regional frameworks from the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and the UN Global Compact for Migration. According to Nicholls, the new policy will streamline legal migration pathways, upgrade border management infrastructure and systems, and align immigration rules with the country’s broader economic growth goals.

    This policy direction mirrors key provisions of the Immigration Bill currently under parliamentary consideration, which includes expanded temporary residency categories, more flexible eligibility requirements for permanent residency, and a new points-based merit immigration system designed to attract skilled workers, foreign direct investment, and high-net-worth retirees. The government has repeatedly argued that the reforms are critical to offset decades of demographic decline and boost Barbados’ competitiveness in the global race to attract high-value human capital and business investment.

    Nicholls used his address to renew international backing for climate finance reform through the Bridgetown Initiative, a global advocacy push led by Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley to restructure global development finance and unlock more affordable funding for climate adaptation and loss and damage in vulnerable developing nations. He warned that climate-related displacement is already placing unprecedented strain on border systems, food security and domestic political stability for small island states, stressing that proactive migration planning is a core part of climate adaptation.

    “Migration should be seen as an option, and not a mere act of survival,” he said.

    The minister also outlined ongoing efforts to deepen engagement with the large Barbadian diaspora communities in the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States, through initiatives to encourage diaspora investment, skills sharing with domestic workers, and return migration for Barbadians living overseas who wish to resettle in their home country.

    Closing his address, Nicholls emphasized that Barbados’ participation in the UN forum was not only to share its national perspective, but to build new global and regional partnerships to advance the shared goal of “safe, orderly and dignified migration” for all.

  • Man charged over attack on API head remanded

    Man charged over attack on API head remanded

    A 45-year-old delivery clerk from Clare Valley has been remanded in custody following a violent multi-charge attack that left one victim fighting for life in intensive care, court documents confirm.

    Keswert Slater, who is a cousin of the acting director of the Agency for Public Information Nadia Slater, appeared before Chief Magistrate Colin John at the Serious Offences Court on Thursday to answer to four separate criminal charges connected to the May 5 incident in his hometown.

    The charges against Slater include attempted murder of Jean Slater, a fellow Clare Valley resident, inflicting grievous bodily harm on Nadia Slater, and trespassing on Nadia Slater’s residential property with the explicit intent to cause serious physical harm. All charges are indictable, so no plea was requested from the defendant during this initial court appearance.

    Prosecuting the case is Inspector of Police Renrick Cato, who formally objected to granting Slater bail ahead of trial. Cato informed the court that one of the victims remains hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit of Milton Cato Memorial Hospital, underscoring the severity of the incident. When Chief Magistrate John asked Slater whether he understood the implications of the prosecution’s bail objection, Slater confirmed he understood and stated that he did not object to being held in prison ahead of his trial.

    Slater, who is currently unrepresented by legal counsel, was ultimately denied bail by the magistrate. The case has been adjourned until Monday, when a formal bail review hearing will be held. This is not the first time Slater has attracted public attention: in 2000, he made local headlines after being linked to the theft of 63,000 Eastern Caribbean dollars from C.K. Greaves & Co Ltd, a local business.

  • Onion glut leaves farmers struggling as imports persist, BAS warns

    Onion glut leaves farmers struggling as imports persist, BAS warns

    A paradoxical crisis has hit Barbados’s onion sector: after a successful government-backed push to expand domestic cultivation that delivered a strong harvest, hundreds of local farmers are now unable to offload their produce, according to warnings from the Barbados Agricultural Society (BAS).

    James Paul, chief executive officer of the industry association, laid out the roots of the crisis during a press briefing. Over the past year, agricultural advocates successfully persuaded local growers to scale up onion planting, pushing total cultivated acreage past the 100-acre mark – a major milestone for the country’s goal of boosting food security and reducing reliance on imports. But this win has laid bare deep, long-unaddressed flaws in the sector’s marketing, distribution and infrastructure frameworks.

    The most pressing issue, Paul explained, is the unregulated flow of imported onions that continues to saturate the local market exactly when domestic crops reach peak harvest. Competing against cheaper foreign shipments puts local producers, who already face far higher production costs than their international competitors, at an insurmountable disadvantage. Paul argued this misaligned policy undermines the very government efforts to expand domestic agriculture.

    “I do not think it makes any logical sense to allow imports during windows where we know a large local harvest is incoming,” Paul said. “When we encourage farmers to invest in expanding production, we have a responsibility to plan ahead for how that produce will reach consumers. Right now, we are forcing growers to compete with imported goods on uneven ground, and that is unfair.”

    Beyond misaligned import policy, gaps in post-harvest infrastructure and storage are compounding farmers’ struggles. Unlike imported onions, which are treated to withstand long-haul shipping, locally grown onions require carefully controlled, well-ventilated storage environments that protect the crop from pests and spoilage. Many of these specialized facilities have fallen into disrepair, Paul said, pointing to the shuttered historic drying plant in Foursquare, St. Philip as an example of the lost infrastructure the sector needs to restore or replace.

    Fragmented coordination among individual farmers has also weakened the sector’s position, Paul added. Without collective organizing, small-scale growers lack collective bargaining power when negotiating with middlemen, and cannot deliver the consistent supply and pricing that major buyers require. This disorganization leaves individual producers vulnerable to exploitation, often forcing them to sell their crop below the cost of production just to clear inventory.

    This dynamic threatens the long-term viability of domestic onion cultivation: if farmers cannot earn a reasonable return on their investment this season, Paul warned, few will be willing to expand planting in the coming year. Currently, just 20% of Barbados’s total onion demand is met by local production, but Paul said the country has the natural capacity to meet 100% of domestic demand if systemic flaws are addressed. With targeted improvements to storage, marketing and coordination, Paul estimated that total cultivated acreage could double to 200 acres within 12 months, creating a more resilient, self-sufficient domestic onion sector.

    As intermittent rainfall threatens remaining unharvested crops, Paul has urged all local onion farmers to share real-time updates on their yields and harvest timelines with the BAS to enable better cross-sector market coordination. He also called for closer collaboration between private sector stakeholders and the state-owned Barbados Agricultural Development and Marketing Corporation (BADMC) to fix gaps in the national onion value chain.

    “Barbados has the ability to fully supply our own onion demand, we can do this,” Paul emphasized. “Right now, we are holding ourselves back from reaching our full potential by failing to put the right systems in place. We all have to work together to fix this – we cannot let farmers invest their time and money into a crop just to be left stuck with unsellable produce.”

  • Is There a Breakthrough in the San Marcos Land Dispute?

    Is There a Breakthrough in the San Marcos Land Dispute?

    A long-simmering land conflict in southern Belize has taken a major step toward resolution, following a high-stakes negotiating session held this week in the nation’s capital of Belmopan.

    On Wednesday, Indigenous Affairs Minister Dr. Louis Zabaneh convened a direct dialogue with representatives from three key stakeholders: the community of San Marcos, the Toledo Alcalde Alliance, and the Maya Leaders Alliance. The talks were convened to ease escalating tensions between the San Marcos community and a private individual with competing claims to the contested land. By the end of the meeting, both conflicting sides had reached a preliminary agreement to move the process forward.

    In comments following the negotiation, Minister Zabaneh outlined the terms of the tentative deal. Over the next 21 days, technical teams from Belize’s Ministry of Natural Resources will conduct an on-site assessment to formally demarcate the exact parcel of land at the center of the disagreement. “We are grateful that both parties agreed to this collaborative path forward,” Zabaneh stated.

    The minister also highlighted the recent establishment of a joint review panel, which includes both government officials and elected Maya community leaders. This panel is currently working through revisions to draft legislation aimed at addressing long-standing indigenous land rights issues across the country, creating a broader policy framework to prevent similar disputes in the future.

    In the coming days, the Maya Leaders Alliance will fulfill its commitment to community transparency: the group is scheduled to gather with San Marcos residents this Friday to walk through the details of this week’s negotiations, answer questions, and gather community input on the next steps of the process.

    More full remarks from Minister Zabaneh on the San Marcos land dispute will be broadcast during News 5’s evening 6 o’clock program tonight for audiences seeking further updates on the negotiation.

  • Op ‘jacht’ naar een ontmoeting met Ashwin Adhin

    Op ‘jacht’ naar een ontmoeting met Ashwin Adhin

    It was early May when a promotional video popped up on my Facebook feed, leading with a portrait of Ashwin Adhin, Speaker of the National Assembly of Suriname, captioned “Suriname Man on a Mission”. The video invited me to a networking evening billed as “A Night of Connection” with Adhin, scheduled for the evening of Thursday, April 30 in Wateringen, a small town west of The Hague between Rijswijk and Naaldwijk. Local organizers Sunil Kowlesar and Hugo Sital, reported to be acquaintances of Adhin, promised attendees light snacks and drinks.

    Wateringen is not exactly known as a hub for Surinamese community events, so I looked up the venue online and was surprised to find it was a small local casual eatery called Warung Chit-Ra. It struck me as an odd choice to host a formal meeting with the sitting speaker of a foreign parliament. It seemed organizers caught wind of the confusion around the original venue, because a few days later I received the same promotional clip updated with a new location: WestCord Hotel Delft, on the same date, still free entry with complimentary food and drinks, plus a WhatsApp contact for registration.

    I seriously considered signing up. I had never met Adhin in person, and I was eager to hear his perspective on the role of the Surinamese diaspora in the Netherlands in supporting ongoing development in Suriname. Around the same time, I saw a separate announcement on LinkedIn from the Diaspora Instituut Nederland (DIN) for another meeting with Adhin, scheduled for the afternoon of Sunday May 3 at the Van der Valk Hotel near Schiphol Airport. Having never attended a DIN event before, I registered for this one instead, paying a 15-euro contribution to cover venue rental costs. This way, I figured I would get my chance to meet Adhin one way or another.

    That weekend was already shaping up to be packed: I had also received a personal invitation to the inaugural Jules Wijdenbosch Lecture, organized by diaspora group Collectief Overzee Surinamers, in Amsterdam-Zuidoost on the afternoon of Saturday May 2.

    But just as I prepared for the weekend, everything began to unravel. First, I got a message canceling the April 30 Adhin event at WestCord Hotel Delft. Then, on the morning of May 2, Surinamese outlet Starnieuws published a story in which Adhin flatly denied any involvement with the DIN event scheduled for Sunday. Notably, he made no comment at all about the canceled Delft gathering.

    Adhin told Starnieuws that with his official approval, the Surinamese ambassador to the Netherlands would host an official networking reception for diaspora organizations, entrepreneurs and professionals Sunday evening May 3 in Amsterdam. The invitation was even published alongside the Starnieuws story, open to all interested attendees. The announcement sparked heated discussion across Dutch social media. But DIN issued its own statement shortly after, confirming the Sunday afternoon event would go forward as planned regardless. By this point, Adhin had become something of an unexpected fixation for me, a constant presence in my planning for days. I found myself debating whether to rearrange my plans to attend the Amsterdam evening event.

    Then, in what was a complete surprise, as I waited for the inaugural Jules Wijdenbosch Lecture to start in Amsterdam-Zuidoost that Saturday afternoon, Adhin himself walked into the venue alongside his wife. Attendees were asked to wait a moment for the Surinamese ambassador, who was en route to the event.

    I was sitting just four rows behind Adhin, so I took the chance to introduce myself. He stood, we shook hands, I shared my name and told him it was an honor to meet him, and we chatted for a few minutes while we waited for the ambassador. It turned out Adhin had to leave early to attend a wedding in Rotterdam, which was the whole reason for his short visit to the Netherlands. I left that chance encounter delighted to have met the figure that had occupied my planning for days.

    When I arrived at the well-attended DIN event the next afternoon, I was naturally curious about how organizers would explain Adhin’s absence. All DIN chair John Brewster shared in his opening remarks was that he had received a message — which I assumed came from the Surinamese embassy — stating Adhin could not attend due to unspecified security risks. Those seeking more details were invited to ask Brewster privately after the event concluded.

    By this point, I had already drawn my own conclusion. No meeting with visiting Surinamese ministers or parliament members, particularly those affiliated with the National Democratic Party (NDP), can go forward without the explicit approval of the Surinamese ambassador in The Hague. It is important to note that Ambassador Panka is no stranger to political organization: he previously served as the NDP’s official spokesperson, and led the party’s own Information & Propaganda Institute.

    After the DIN event wrapped, I briefly considered heading to Amsterdam to attend the official evening reception and hear Adhin speak after all. But I had not registered in advance, and it seemed likely security would turn me away at the door, so I decided to head home instead.

    Late that Sunday night, as I scrolled through Facebook before bed, I came across a photo from the Rotterdam wedding Adhin had left the Amsterdam lecture to attend. He was dressed in a celebratory, tailored three-piece burgundy suit, so well-fitted and formal that for a moment I thought he was the groom. As I went to sleep with that image in my mind, I could not help but note one clear contradiction: there had been no mention of security risks at that wedding.

    This firsthand account of the chaotic sequence of events around Adhin’s short visit to the Netherlands offers a clear look at how diaspora engagement with Suriname’s ruling party works through official channels, and the frictions that arise when independent groups try to organize their own engagements.

  • Overcharged on the Bus? Report It, Says Transport Minister

    Overcharged on the Bus? Report It, Says Transport Minister

    Just days after a regulated bus fare increase took effect across the country, widespread commuter complaints about unauthorized overcharging have prompted top transport officials to roll out a public reporting mechanism and strict penalties for non-compliant operators. The new fare structure, which went into force on Monday this week, adds between 50 cents and one dollar to existing ticket prices, a change implemented to offset the ongoing spike in operating costs for bus companies. To further ease the financial pressure on these operators, the government has also approved a new $3 per gallon diesel subsidy program, funded by $1.5 million in public expenditure over a three-month period, that is scheduled to launch next Monday. Despite these policy adjustments designed to bring predictability to bus pricing, commuters have flooded transport authorities with consistent reports that some providers are charging fares far higher than the officially approved new rates. Responding to growing public outcry, Transport Minister Dr. Louis Zabaneh publicly addressed the concerns this week, confirming that the government is actively monitoring fare practices across all routes to root out non-compliance. “We have already published all official fare guidelines and our reporting channels on our official social media platforms,” Dr. Zabaneh explained in a public statement. “Commuters can call a dedicated hotline to report any instance of overcharging, and our enforcement team will launch an immediate investigation into every claim.” The minister did not leave room for ambiguity when outlining potential consequences for operators that intentionally overcharge passengers. Dr. Zabaneh confirmed that any proven violation of the approved fare structure could lead to severe action, including the full revocation of an operator’s license to provide public bus services. The government’s quick response comes as it seeks to balance support for bus operators struggling with rising fuel costs with protection for working commuters who rely on public transit for daily travel.

  • Court of Appeal overturns High Court’s ruling on ExxonMobil, EPA’s financial guarantees

    Court of Appeal overturns High Court’s ruling on ExxonMobil, EPA’s financial guarantees

    On Thursday, 7 May 2026, Guyana’s Court of Appeal delivered a unanimous landmark ruling reversing a 2023 High Court judgment that found ExxonMobil Guyana Limited and the country’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in breach of statutory and environmental permit obligations. The decision, handed down by Court President Dawn Gregory Barnes alongside Justices of Appeal Nareshwar Harnanan and Priya Sewnarine-Beharry, marks a major resolution to a high-stakes legal dispute over environmental liability rules for the country’s offshore petroleum operations.

    The case originated in 2023, when activists Frederick Collins and Godfrey Whyte brought a legal challenge against Exxon and the EPA. Then-High Court Justice Sandil Kissoon ruled in the claimants’ favor, accepting the argument that Exxon’s liability for environmental damage from its offshore work must be unlimited, and thus the financial guarantee required under the company’s environmental permit also needed to be uncapped. Justice Kissoon found that Exxon had knowingly violated its obligations by only submitting a US$2 billion capped guarantee, and the EPA had breached its own statutory duties by approving this limited financial assurance. He ordered the EPA to issue an enforcement notice forcing Exxon to secure an unlimited guarantee within 30 days, and threatened to suspend the company’s operating permit if it failed to comply.

    Both Exxon and the EPA appealed the ruling to the Court of Appeal, which immediately granted a stay on Justice Kissoon’s orders pending the appeal outcome. The appellate court heard full legal arguments from all involved parties in February 2026. Andrew Pollard, lead defense counsel for Exxon, outlined the court’s core findings after the ruling was released.

    Pollard explained that the appellate court drew a critical legal distinction between unlimited liability for environmental damage and the separate requirement of financial assurance. The court found that Justice Kissoon had made a legal error by conflating these two distinct concepts. Under the correct interpretation of the permit’s financial provisions, Exxon was only required to submit a guarantee for a fixed, defined amount. The court further held that the EPA retains discretionary authority under Guyana’s Environmental Protection Act and the terms of the permit to approve a capped guarantee, and Justice Kissoon had overstepped his jurisdiction by substituting his own judgment for the agency’s statutorily granted discretion.

    The ruling also confirmed that the EPA and Exxon acted appropriately in negotiating the US$2 billion guarantee, noting that Parliament had designated the EPA as the sole authorized body to make such regulatory determinations. Additionally, the court threw out Justice Kissoon’s finding that the insurance policy submitted by Exxon and approved by the EPA did not meet international petroleum industry standards, as there was no admissible evidence presented to support that conclusion. All orders issued by the High Court in 2023 were formally set aside.

    The path to the appellate ruling included a prior detour at the regional Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ). The Guyana Court of Appeal initially blocked the country’s Attorney General from joining the case as a party, but the CCJ overturned that decision, emphasizing that the Attorney General is tasked with representing public interest, and this dispute carried significant public interest implications. That ruling cleared the way for the Attorney General to participate in the appellate proceedings and submit legal arguments.

    Multiple legal teams represented the diverse parties in the case: Exxon was represented by Andrew Pollard SC, Edward Luckhoo SC, and Eleanor Luckhoo; the EPA was represented by Sanjeev Datadin and Mohanie Anganoo; claimants Collins and Whyte were represented by Seenath Jairam SC, Saevion David-Longe, Melinda Janki, and Abiola Wong-Inniss; and the state was represented by Attorney General Anil Nandlall, Arud Gossai, and Shoshanna Lall.

  • Dominica joins regional push for urban climate resilience at UN House meeting in Barbados

    Dominica joins regional push for urban climate resilience at UN House meeting in Barbados

    Seven Caribbean nations have concluded a two-day regional climate resilience workshop in Bridgetown, Barbados, marking a critical step forward in translating global climate pledges into tangible action for vulnerable urban communities across the region.

    Hosted at UN House and organized by UN-Habitat’s Sustainable Urban Resilience for the Next Generation (SURGe) programme in partnership with the Government of Barbados and the UN Sub-Regional Team for Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean, the workshop brought together senior housing and urban development officials from Dominica, Barbados, Belize, Guyana, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, and Trinidad and Tobago. Climate change focal points from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change also joined the proceedings virtually.

    The gathering centered on accelerating coordinated urban climate action, with targeted focus on three high-priority areas: climate-resilient housing, critical infrastructure upgrades, and long-term resilience planning. At its conclusion, participants formally launched the Bridgetown Technical Roadmap, a country-led framework that outlines clear priorities, accountability checkpoints, and coordinated next steps for the next 12 months to guide collective action across participating nations.

    Addressing delegates at the opening ceremony, Barbados’ Minister of Housing, Lands and Maintenance Christopher Gibbs emphasized that the region can no longer rely on non-binding pledges to protect communities from climate harm. “Across the Caribbean, we have made strong climate commitments. Through our Nationally Determined Contributions, our countries have set out ambitious goals to reduce emissions, build resilience, and protect our people and economies from the impacts of climate change. But commitments alone will not protect a roof. Commitments alone will not drain a flooded road,” Gibbs said.

    Drawing lessons from recent devastating hurricane seasons, Gibbs pointed to long-neglected infrastructure gaps—particularly inadequate drainage systems—as a critical unaddressed challenge, noting the widespread flood damage seen in Jamaica following recent storm events that was amplified by poor infrastructure planning. He also highlighted housing finance as a persistent barrier to resilience, explaining that many Caribbean households still struggle to access adequate funding for climate-resilient home ownership even when they meet mortgage eligibility requirements.

    UN Resident Coordinator for Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean Simon Springett praised Caribbean nations for their global climate leadership, even amid growing uncertainty around international climate finance and support. “The Caribbean is not a place that waits to be saved. The Caribbean is a place that produces solutions. It exports ideas, and it speaks time and time again with the clarity and moral force that punches profoundly above its weight in global conversations,” Springett said in his welcome address.

    Elkin Velasquez Monsalve, Regional Director of UN-Habitat for Latin America and the Caribbean, reaffirmed that all ongoing and future resilience work in the region will remain centered on national priorities and local realities. “In the Caribbean, adequate housing sits at the centre of urban climate action. This Workshop, and the work that follows, reflects exactly that conviction: country-led, anchored in multilevel governance, and grounded in the realities of each country,” he said.

    Luis Antonio Ramírez García echoed this framing, noting that housing is the most consistently and devastatingly impacted asset when climate disasters strike. “When we speak about climate change, we speak about many things: hurricanes, floods, rising seas. But what is most consistently affected, and most painfully lost, is housing. We lose our homes, our history, the very places that hold who we are, and we are left vulnerable. That is what we are here to change,” he said, confirming that the roadmap binds both participating governments and UN-Habitat to its 12-month action plan.

    One of the workshop’s landmark outcomes is the Caribbean Urban Climate Action Collective Baseline, the first regional self-assessment of its kind that analyzes how Caribbean nations are currently integrating climate considerations into housing and urban planning policy. The assessment maps key barriers to climate-resilient urban development and identifies priority areas where UN-Habitat will provide targeted technical support to participating nations over the coming year.

    Beyond the roadmap and baseline assessment, delegates also used the event to exchange practical experiences and solutions for managing densely populated urban areas and upgrading living conditions in climate-vulnerable communities. Three core outputs from the initiative are expected: the baseline assessment, the Bridgetown Technical Roadmap, and the SURGe Caribbean Background Paper, which will document regional needs and priorities for global stakeholders.

    The work launched in Bridgetown is expected to inform global climate and urban policy discussions at the upcoming 13th World Urban Forum and the 31st UN Climate Change Conference (COP31). It also lays the foundation for a long-term technical partnership between UN-Habitat and Caribbean governments, with implementation of the roadmap’s commitments supported by the United Nations Country Team for Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean, which collaborates with sub-regional governments to advance national development priorities.

  • Worrell: Currency shifts won’t affect Caribbean economies

    Worrell: Currency shifts won’t affect Caribbean economies

    Long-established market forces have cemented the United States dollar’s position as the undisputed global standard of value, and recent fluctuations in other major currencies will bring no meaningful economic shifts to Caribbean nations, according to a prominent former central banking leader from the region.

    Dr Delisle Worrell, former governor of the Central Bank of Barbados and a veteran International Monetary Fund consultant, laid out this argument in the May issue of his regularly published Economic Letter, which carries the headline *The Dollar is the World’s Standard of Value*.

    Worrell stressed that Caribbean economies are structured entirely around the US dollar for cross-border activity. Every key external transaction for the region—from pricing tourist packages to settling export and import trades, to securing foreign debt—uses the US dollar as the benchmark, and all clearing processes run through dollar-denominated accounts hosted by American commercial banks and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Against this backdrop, recent upward movements in the value of sterling, the Canadian dollar, the euro, the Japanese yen and the Chinese renminbi will not alter core economic conditions for Caribbean countries, he said.

    The former governor, who also founded the Central Bank of Barbados’ research department, pointed out that the primary spillover harm from today’s global economic instability hitting Caribbean nations is imported inflation. He outlined a clear threshold for policy response: only countries where governments hold a fiscal surplus of revenue over current expenditure exceeding 2% of GDP have the capacity to roll out targeted subsidies to cap fuel and essential goods prices. For all other regional economies, there are few policy tools available to ease inflationary pressure, he added.

    Worrell also issued a strong caution against one commonly proposed policy adjustment: revaluing domestic currencies to counteract inflation brought in from global markets. He explained that if a central bank drew down its foreign currency reserves to push the domestic exchange rate higher, market participants including commercial banks, import and export firms, and tourism operators would almost certainly hoard the cheapened US dollars instead of passing the exchange rate benefits through to consumers and other end users.

    Global monetary data backs his broader claim about the dollar’s dominance: out of 180 legally recognized sovereign currencies across the world, the value of all 179 non-US currencies is defined relative to the dollar, Worrell noted. This status quo is not dependent on US government policy, shifts in the US or global economy, or price movements of gold, oil or other commodities, he said. It also has not been dislodged by the emergence of cryptocurrencies built on blockchain technology or any other fintech innovation. “All economic values are based on the dollar,” he concluded.

    Worrell frames the dollar’s global benchmark status as a historical convention, comparable to the widespread adoption of Greenwich Mean Time as a global time standard. He traced the 80-year evolution of this arrangement: after World War II ended in 1945, the global economy split into two separate geopolitical and economic blocs, with the United States holding overwhelming sway over trade and finance in the Western democratic sphere. This established the dollar as the reference currency for all nations outside the Soviet-led bloc. When the Soviet Union collapsed in the early 1990s, the dollar’s use as a global reference spread to every corner of the world.

    Crucially, Worrell emphasized that the dollar’s dominance emerged from organic market practice rather than top-down policy mandate from the United States or global institutions. Individual consumers, multinational companies and financial institutions across the world have consistently chosen the dollar as the go-to reference for settling cross-border transactions. He offered a common example: a consumer in Jamaica purchasing goods from Chinese suppliers will almost always first calculate the cost in US dollars before converting the total to Jamaican dollars for their final budgeting.

    This entrenched market preference has outlasted every challenge to the dollar’s status, Worrell argued. Even as major economies including post-war Germany, Japan and most recently China rose to become the world’s second-largest economy, global markets have retained the dollar as the primary settlement currency. The dollar’s benchmark position also emerged unscathed from the 2007–2008 global financial crisis and the subsequent downgrading of market confidence in US government creditworthiness.

    Today, despite growing uncertainty around the direction of US policy and the global economic volatility this unpredictability generates, there is no evidence of a broad global shift away from the dollar toward the euro, renminbi or any other alternative currency to serve as the universal standard of value, Worrell said.

  • Temporary closure and interruption in cash services

    Temporary closure and interruption in cash services

    The Magistracy Department has issued a public advisory confirming that all court-based cashing services will be completely unavailable to the general public on Wednesday, 13 May 2026. This planned, temporary service pause is not the result of an operational error or system failure, but rather a deliberate step to make space for a mandatory, institution-wide Cashiers’ Training program. The department emphasized that this training initiative is designed to upskill all cashiering staff, with the explicit goal of boosting both the speed of service delivery and the overall quality of support offered to community members accessing court facilities. Regular cashing operations are scheduled to fully resume at all court offices starting at 8:00 a.m. local time on Thursday, 14 May 2026. In closing its advisory, the Magistracy Department extended a sincere apology to all residents and visitors who may experience disruption or inconvenience to their planned court-related business during this one-day suspension. This advisory is issued by the Magistracy Department. NOW Grenada notes that it does not take responsibility for the opinions, statements, or third-party contributed content shared on its platform, and provides a reporting channel for users to flag any abusive content.