作者: admin

  • Cuba condemns new U.S. sanctions as Washington intensifies pressure campaign

    Cuba condemns new U.S. sanctions as Washington intensifies pressure campaign

    A fresh round of U.S. sanctions targeting Cuba has deepened a months-long pressure campaign against the Caribbean island nation, announced just hours after United Nations experts slammed Washington’s restrictions on Cuban fuel supplies as a campaign of “energy starvation” that threatens humanitarian catastrophe.

    The new measures, revealed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury on May 7, 2026, mark the first enforcement action stemming from a White House executive order signed on May 1 that escalates Washington’s decades-long economic, financial, and commercial blockade of Cuba to unprecedented levels, according to Cuba’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In an official statement released via the Cuban embassy, Havana issued a fierce rejection of both the executive order and the latest sanctions, which add two major Cuban entities — the group Gaesa and mining firm MoaNickel S.A. — to the U.S. Specially Designated Nationals List.

    Cuban officials characterize the move as a brutal act of economic aggression designed to expand the blockade’s impact far beyond U.S. borders, opening the door to secondary sanctions against foreign companies, banks, and third-party entities even when their operations have no legitimate connection to U.S. commercial activity. This extraterritorial overreach, the statement argues, directly violates core principles of international law and the foundational norms of global free trade, while infringing on the sovereign right of all nations to maintain independent economic and diplomatic relations with Cuba.

    The Cuban government links the latest sanctions escalation to restrictive energy measures imposed by the Trump administration in January 2026, which severely disrupted the country’s fuel imports. Together, the combined measures are pushing Cuba’s already fragile economy to the breaking point, exacerbating existing shortages of basic goods and amplifying the risk of a full-scale humanitarian crisis. U.S. diplomatic and financial pressure designed to discourage global engagement with Cuba is a deliberate tactic to cut the island off from global markets, Cuban officials say, part of a broader strategy to weaken the national economy and inflict widespread hardship on the Cuban people in an attempt to force political change.

    Worsening conditions, the ministry warns, could be leveraged by Washington as a pretext for further escalatory actions against the country. Cuba rejects any claim that external pressure justifies interference in its domestic political and economic systems, and stresses that it will continue to defend its sovereignty through diplomatic channels in international forums.

    “We denounce the criminal nature of these aggressive measures aimed at forcing the entire Cuban population to surrender through hunger and desperation and at attempting to create a social, economic, and political catastrophe on a national scale,” the statement reads. “We also reject the U.S. government’s intention to create a humanitarian crisis in order to justify more dangerous actions, including military aggression against Cuba.”

    U.S. restrictions on Cuba have a decades-long history: the original trade embargo was first imposed in 1962, and it remained in place until President Barack Obama normalized relations and lifted most sanctions during his tenure. The Trump administration reimposed sweeping restrictions in January 2026, launching a targeted energy blockade that has been expanded further through the May 1 executive order and this week’s new sanctions designations. The UN experts’ recent warning that U.S. policy has already created a crisis of “energy starvation” adds international condemnation to the escalating standoff, as Cuba calls on the global community to reject Washington’s unilateral measures and defend the principle of national sovereignty.

  • Belize, Louisiana Guard Mark 30 Years of Partnership

    Belize, Louisiana Guard Mark 30 Years of Partnership

    Three decades of collaborative security work between Belize’s national defense bodies and the U.S. Louisiana National Guard has hit a landmark milestone, with leaders from both sides gathering last month in New Orleans to honor 30 years of shared strategic cooperation. In April 2026, senior government and military delegates from Belize traveled to Louisiana to mark the anniversary of a partnership first established in 1996 through the U.S. National Guard’s State Partnership Program.

    The anniversary gathering brought together top leadership from both Belize and the United States, creating space to reflect on 30 years of joint progress and outline plans for future collaboration. From its launch, the core mission of the partnership has centered on coordinated tactical training, cross-force military cooperation, and enhancing operational readiness for both Belize’s Defence Force and Coast Guard. Over the 30-year timeline, the scope of the collaboration has expanded far beyond its initial military training focus, growing to encompass joint work in homeland security coordination, cross-border humanitarian aid deployment, and standardized disaster response preparedness.

    During their visit to New Orleans, Belizean delegates took part in a packed schedule of official strategic meetings, professional knowledge exchanges, and guided tours of key regional operational sites. One of the most anticipated stops on the itinerary was a visit to the National WWII Museum, where delegates explored the history of global collective security efforts. The centerpiece of the anniversary celebration was the official commemoration ceremony held at Jackson Barracks, the historic headquarters of the Louisiana National Guard. At the ceremony, leaders from both sides shared reflections on three decades of mutual trust, aligned security priorities, and people-to-people connections forged through joint training and field operations.

    Officials from both nations have emphasized the outsized impact of this 30-year partnership on regional stability in Central America and the Caribbean. Both Belizean and U.S. leadership reiterated that the ongoing collaboration remains a core pillar of bilateral security relations, creating tangible benefits for citizens of both countries and contributing to a more secure regional environment. Looking ahead, leaders have confirmed plans to deepen collaboration in emerging security areas, including climate-driven disaster response and transnational threat mitigation, building on the strong foundation laid over the past three decades.

  • QEH bolstering surveillance to protect staff, patients

    QEH bolstering surveillance to protect staff, patients

    Against a backdrop of growing frequency of shootings and violent encounters that have strained hospital operations across Barbados, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH) is moving forward with a targeted set of security upgrades to safeguard frontline staff and patients, chief executive Neil Clark has confirmed. In an exclusive interview with Barbados TODAY Wednesday, held on the sidelines of the launch event for digital information management firm Abergower, Clark outlined the timeline and scope of the planned changes, emphasizing that the enhanced measures have become a critical necessity for the facility at this juncture.

    First on the agenda is specialized additional training for all QEH security personnel, set to be delivered by the national prison service this month. The training will focus on de-escalation and safe management of aggressive, high-risk individuals, equipping on-site security teams with the tools to respond effectively to volatile situations.

    Alongside training, the hospital is rolling out body-worn cameras for all security staff, a transparency and accountability measure Clark says will benefit both security officers and the public. “The core purpose of these cameras is two-fold: it creates an official record of any incident that unfolds, and the knowledge that interactions are being recorded often encourages calmer behavior from all parties involved,” Clark explained. “This not only helps clarify what happens in the event of a dispute, but also acts as a proactive deterrent to aggression.”

    Unlike broad overhauls that would add large numbers of new security staff, QEH’s strategy prioritizes improving infrastructure and capability within its existing workforce structure. The hospital is also expanding its closed-circuit video surveillance network across more areas of the facility, giving management real-time visibility into developing incidents across the campus. Clark noted that once training is complete and body cameras are fully deployed, QEH leadership will conduct a review to assess whether further upgrades are required. For now, he says, the existing split of in-house security personnel and contracted outsourced staff remains sufficient to handle current demand.

    Clark explained that the hybrid staffing model is strategically deployed to leverage the strengths of both teams: in-house security, who are on-site full-time, have stronger familiarity with QEH’s layout and protocols, making them far more responsive to emerging incidents. Outsourced staff primarily handle static gate monitoring duties, allowing the in-house team to be deployed to high-risk areas that require rapid, flexible support.

    The QEH chief also commended the existing partnership between hospital security and local law enforcement, pointing to their fast, coordinated response during violent incidents that bring shooting and stabbing victims to the hospital’s Accident and Emergency (A&E) department. “Whenever we receive a patient with a gunshot wound, officers arrive on site within minutes, and maintain a visible physical presence to prevent follow-up attacks from rival parties who may try to come to the hospital to complete an act of violence,” Clark said. “Security teams work hand-in-hand with A&E clinical staff to secure the area quickly, which has been extremely effective so far.”

    Even with effective response protocols in place, Clark acknowledged that violent incidents create major disruptions to hospital operations. Most shootings require an immediate full or partial lockdown of the emergency department to contain risk, which slows the delivery of care for other patients and creates anxiety among clinical staff and visitors. Redirecting clinical and security staff to manage the lockdown also pushes out wait times for patients seeking care for unrelated conditions, a trade-off Clark says is unavoidable when safety is at stake.

    Beyond physical security measures, QEH has put in place dedicated mental health support for staff who experience trauma during violent incidents. Clark says the facility offers access to professional counsellors for all employees, and the local vicar also provides on-demand emotional support. Team leaders conduct routine debriefs after major incidents to normalize any stress or anxiety that staff may experience, and encourage employees to access support services even if they don’t feel immediate impacts, since traumatic responses can emerge over time.

    “Our priority is two-fold: keep everyone on campus safe physically, and make sure our team has the support they need to process these traumatic events,” Clark added.

  • $4 Million USD to Save Dangriga’s Shrinking Beach

    $4 Million USD to Save Dangriga’s Shrinking Beach

    For years, residents of Dangriga, Belize have stood by as rising seas and persistent coastal erosion have steadily gnawed away at their beloved local coastline, with chunks of the once-sprawling beach vanishing into the ocean year after year. Now, a transformative $4 million USD restoration initiative is kicking off to halt this damaging trend before the beach is lost entirely for future generations.

    Officially launched this week, the broad coastal resilience project targets 27 coastal communities across Belize that are already grappling with the tangible impacts of anthropogenic climate change, from extreme storm surges to chronic shoreline retreat. In Dangriga, all project focus is centered on the town’s vulnerable northern shoreline, the area hit hardest by erosion in recent decades.

    For long-time local resident Melvin Diego, the slow disappearance of the beach is a deeply personal loss. The stretch of sand that once served as his regular outdoor training space has shrunk dramatically, eaten away incrementally by rising sea levels and relentless coastal erosion. “Dangriga is a place where there is a lot of breeze and the sea comes drastically hard. So it worries me that we are not going to have any beach ten years, twenty-five years from now for our children,” Diego shared, voicing a concern shared by many long-time local residents who rely on the shore for recreation, cultural connection, and economic activity centered on tourism and fishing.

    Eli Romero, climate finance manager at the Protected Areas Conservation Trust (PACT), explained that preliminary geological surveys have revealed a key detail that makes restoration feasible: the sand eroded from Dangriga’s shoreline has not been swept out to the open ocean permanently, but instead settled in offshore deposits directly in front of the town. The core of the restoration project will center on dredging these offshore sand deposits and redistributing the sediment back onto the eroding shore, rebuilding the beach to its historic width and resilience.

    The ambitious initiative is supported by a partnership of three key stakeholders: the Protected Areas Conservation Trust, the global Adaptation Fund, and the Government of Belize, combining international climate finance, local conservation expertise, and national government support to deliver tangible climate adaptation action for vulnerable coastal communities. A follow-up on-site report from News 5 will air later this week, giving audiences an up-close look at the eroding shoreline and introducing a local activist who has spent decades cleaning and advocating for the protection of Dangriga’s coastline.

  • $4 Million to Save Dangriga’s Shrinking Beach

    $4 Million to Save Dangriga’s Shrinking Beach

    For years, residents of Dangriga have watched in alarm as rising sea levels and persistent coastal erosion steadily gnaw away at their beloved shoreline. But this week, a transformative $4 million coastal conservation initiative has officially kicked off, bringing urgent intervention to save the disappearing beach before it is lost forever.

    The multi-community climate adaptation program, which targets 27 coastal settlements across Belize already grappling with the tangible impacts of a changing climate, has centered its immediate efforts on Dangriga’s vulnerable northern coastline. For generations, this stretch of sand has been a central part of local life – from casual recreation to daily exercise – but decades of relentless tidal action have steadily reduced its size.

    Local resident Melvin Diego shared his deep concern over the shoreline’s gradual disappearance, a spot he once frequented regularly for personal training. “Dangriga is a place where there is a lot of breeze and the sea comes drastically hard. So it worries me that we are not going to have any beach ten years, twenty-five years from now for our children,” Diego explained, echoing the fears of many long-time residents who have watched the beach shrink incrementally over time.

    Eli Romero, climate finance manager at the Protected Areas Conservation Trust (PACT), outlined the science behind the restoration strategy. Preliminary geological surveys have confirmed that the sand eroded from Dangriga’s shoreline has not been washed out to sea permanently; instead, it has accumulated offshore, directly in front of the town. The project’s core intervention will involve dredging this accumulated sand and redistributing it back onto the original beach to rebuild the shoreline.

    The ambitious restoration effort is a collaborative partnership between three key stakeholders: the Adaptation Fund, the Protected Areas Conservation Trust, and the Government of Belize, bringing together climate finance, local conservation expertise, and governmental support to address a pressing climate adaptation challenge. Local news outlet News 5 has announced it will air an in-depth on-location report from Dangriga in its upcoming broadcast, featuring interviews with a long-time local conservation advocate who has cleaned and protected the shoreline for decades, alongside exclusive footage of the eroding coastline ahead of restoration work.

  • Govt defends migration policy at UN forum

    Govt defends migration policy at UN forum

    Just days after facing heated parliamentary pushback over its controversial planned immigration overhauls, Barbados’ government has carried its policy argument to the global stage, telling a key United Nations gathering that strategic migration management is non-negotiable for the small island nation’s economic survival amid cascading demographic decline, workforce contraction and accelerating climate change pressures.

    Speaking at the Second International Migration Review Forum in New York, Barbados’ Minister of Home Affairs Gregory Nicholls framed migration as a core development strategy rather than a policy challenge for small island developing states (SIDS) grappling with widespread labor gaps, aging populations and climate-driven instability. The quadrennial forum serves as the UN’s flagship global convening, bringing together governments, civil society and private sector stakeholders to evaluate progress on the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, share lessons from implementation hurdles, and align on future commitments to improve global migration governance.

    “Migration, managed well, is not a burden. It is an engine for creativity, innovation and growth,” Nicholls told assembled delegates in his address.

    His comments came on the heels of a fiercely contested debate in Barbados’ House of Assembly over proposed updates to the country’s immigration and citizenship legislation, which the administration has positioned as a critical response to years of population shrinkage, high rates of outward migration among skilled workers, and growing strain on the domestic labor market. During the parliamentary debate, Nicholls emphasized that Barbados’ shrinking and rapidly aging population poses an existential threat to long-term economic growth, the long-term solvency of the national pension system, and the country’s ability to compete in the global tourism and digital services sectors.

    Expanding on that framing for the international audience, Nicholls stressed that for SIDS, climate change and migration are inextricably linked policy priorities, not separate issues. “For small island developing states, climate change and migration are not parallel agendas – they are the same agenda,” he said.

    Nicholls also used the UN platform to highlight Barbados’ recent progress advancing regional integration through a landmark free movement agreement launched last October with three other Caribbean nations: Belize, Dominica, and St Vincent and the Grenadines. The pact grants citizens of all participating states the right to live and work without time limits across member territories, while guaranteeing equal access to public healthcare and primary and secondary education for migrant workers’ children. “This is not generosity. It is obligation built on political will, regional solidarity and human rights,” Nicholls said of the agreement.

    Barbados is also currently developing a comprehensive national migration policy aligned with regional frameworks from the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and the UN Global Compact for Migration. According to Nicholls, the new policy will streamline legal migration pathways, upgrade border management infrastructure and systems, and align immigration rules with the country’s broader economic growth goals.

    This policy direction mirrors key provisions of the Immigration Bill currently under parliamentary consideration, which includes expanded temporary residency categories, more flexible eligibility requirements for permanent residency, and a new points-based merit immigration system designed to attract skilled workers, foreign direct investment, and high-net-worth retirees. The government has repeatedly argued that the reforms are critical to offset decades of demographic decline and boost Barbados’ competitiveness in the global race to attract high-value human capital and business investment.

    Nicholls used his address to renew international backing for climate finance reform through the Bridgetown Initiative, a global advocacy push led by Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley to restructure global development finance and unlock more affordable funding for climate adaptation and loss and damage in vulnerable developing nations. He warned that climate-related displacement is already placing unprecedented strain on border systems, food security and domestic political stability for small island states, stressing that proactive migration planning is a core part of climate adaptation.

    “Migration should be seen as an option, and not a mere act of survival,” he said.

    The minister also outlined ongoing efforts to deepen engagement with the large Barbadian diaspora communities in the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States, through initiatives to encourage diaspora investment, skills sharing with domestic workers, and return migration for Barbadians living overseas who wish to resettle in their home country.

    Closing his address, Nicholls emphasized that Barbados’ participation in the UN forum was not only to share its national perspective, but to build new global and regional partnerships to advance the shared goal of “safe, orderly and dignified migration” for all.

  • Man charged over attack on API head remanded

    Man charged over attack on API head remanded

    A 45-year-old delivery clerk from Clare Valley has been remanded in custody following a violent multi-charge attack that left one victim fighting for life in intensive care, court documents confirm.

    Keswert Slater, who is a cousin of the acting director of the Agency for Public Information Nadia Slater, appeared before Chief Magistrate Colin John at the Serious Offences Court on Thursday to answer to four separate criminal charges connected to the May 5 incident in his hometown.

    The charges against Slater include attempted murder of Jean Slater, a fellow Clare Valley resident, inflicting grievous bodily harm on Nadia Slater, and trespassing on Nadia Slater’s residential property with the explicit intent to cause serious physical harm. All charges are indictable, so no plea was requested from the defendant during this initial court appearance.

    Prosecuting the case is Inspector of Police Renrick Cato, who formally objected to granting Slater bail ahead of trial. Cato informed the court that one of the victims remains hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit of Milton Cato Memorial Hospital, underscoring the severity of the incident. When Chief Magistrate John asked Slater whether he understood the implications of the prosecution’s bail objection, Slater confirmed he understood and stated that he did not object to being held in prison ahead of his trial.

    Slater, who is currently unrepresented by legal counsel, was ultimately denied bail by the magistrate. The case has been adjourned until Monday, when a formal bail review hearing will be held. This is not the first time Slater has attracted public attention: in 2000, he made local headlines after being linked to the theft of 63,000 Eastern Caribbean dollars from C.K. Greaves & Co Ltd, a local business.

  • Onion glut leaves farmers struggling as imports persist, BAS warns

    Onion glut leaves farmers struggling as imports persist, BAS warns

    A paradoxical crisis has hit Barbados’s onion sector: after a successful government-backed push to expand domestic cultivation that delivered a strong harvest, hundreds of local farmers are now unable to offload their produce, according to warnings from the Barbados Agricultural Society (BAS).

    James Paul, chief executive officer of the industry association, laid out the roots of the crisis during a press briefing. Over the past year, agricultural advocates successfully persuaded local growers to scale up onion planting, pushing total cultivated acreage past the 100-acre mark – a major milestone for the country’s goal of boosting food security and reducing reliance on imports. But this win has laid bare deep, long-unaddressed flaws in the sector’s marketing, distribution and infrastructure frameworks.

    The most pressing issue, Paul explained, is the unregulated flow of imported onions that continues to saturate the local market exactly when domestic crops reach peak harvest. Competing against cheaper foreign shipments puts local producers, who already face far higher production costs than their international competitors, at an insurmountable disadvantage. Paul argued this misaligned policy undermines the very government efforts to expand domestic agriculture.

    “I do not think it makes any logical sense to allow imports during windows where we know a large local harvest is incoming,” Paul said. “When we encourage farmers to invest in expanding production, we have a responsibility to plan ahead for how that produce will reach consumers. Right now, we are forcing growers to compete with imported goods on uneven ground, and that is unfair.”

    Beyond misaligned import policy, gaps in post-harvest infrastructure and storage are compounding farmers’ struggles. Unlike imported onions, which are treated to withstand long-haul shipping, locally grown onions require carefully controlled, well-ventilated storage environments that protect the crop from pests and spoilage. Many of these specialized facilities have fallen into disrepair, Paul said, pointing to the shuttered historic drying plant in Foursquare, St. Philip as an example of the lost infrastructure the sector needs to restore or replace.

    Fragmented coordination among individual farmers has also weakened the sector’s position, Paul added. Without collective organizing, small-scale growers lack collective bargaining power when negotiating with middlemen, and cannot deliver the consistent supply and pricing that major buyers require. This disorganization leaves individual producers vulnerable to exploitation, often forcing them to sell their crop below the cost of production just to clear inventory.

    This dynamic threatens the long-term viability of domestic onion cultivation: if farmers cannot earn a reasonable return on their investment this season, Paul warned, few will be willing to expand planting in the coming year. Currently, just 20% of Barbados’s total onion demand is met by local production, but Paul said the country has the natural capacity to meet 100% of domestic demand if systemic flaws are addressed. With targeted improvements to storage, marketing and coordination, Paul estimated that total cultivated acreage could double to 200 acres within 12 months, creating a more resilient, self-sufficient domestic onion sector.

    As intermittent rainfall threatens remaining unharvested crops, Paul has urged all local onion farmers to share real-time updates on their yields and harvest timelines with the BAS to enable better cross-sector market coordination. He also called for closer collaboration between private sector stakeholders and the state-owned Barbados Agricultural Development and Marketing Corporation (BADMC) to fix gaps in the national onion value chain.

    “Barbados has the ability to fully supply our own onion demand, we can do this,” Paul emphasized. “Right now, we are holding ourselves back from reaching our full potential by failing to put the right systems in place. We all have to work together to fix this – we cannot let farmers invest their time and money into a crop just to be left stuck with unsellable produce.”

  • Is There a Breakthrough in the San Marcos Land Dispute?

    Is There a Breakthrough in the San Marcos Land Dispute?

    A long-simmering land conflict in southern Belize has taken a major step toward resolution, following a high-stakes negotiating session held this week in the nation’s capital of Belmopan.

    On Wednesday, Indigenous Affairs Minister Dr. Louis Zabaneh convened a direct dialogue with representatives from three key stakeholders: the community of San Marcos, the Toledo Alcalde Alliance, and the Maya Leaders Alliance. The talks were convened to ease escalating tensions between the San Marcos community and a private individual with competing claims to the contested land. By the end of the meeting, both conflicting sides had reached a preliminary agreement to move the process forward.

    In comments following the negotiation, Minister Zabaneh outlined the terms of the tentative deal. Over the next 21 days, technical teams from Belize’s Ministry of Natural Resources will conduct an on-site assessment to formally demarcate the exact parcel of land at the center of the disagreement. “We are grateful that both parties agreed to this collaborative path forward,” Zabaneh stated.

    The minister also highlighted the recent establishment of a joint review panel, which includes both government officials and elected Maya community leaders. This panel is currently working through revisions to draft legislation aimed at addressing long-standing indigenous land rights issues across the country, creating a broader policy framework to prevent similar disputes in the future.

    In the coming days, the Maya Leaders Alliance will fulfill its commitment to community transparency: the group is scheduled to gather with San Marcos residents this Friday to walk through the details of this week’s negotiations, answer questions, and gather community input on the next steps of the process.

    More full remarks from Minister Zabaneh on the San Marcos land dispute will be broadcast during News 5’s evening 6 o’clock program tonight for audiences seeking further updates on the negotiation.

  • Op ‘jacht’ naar een ontmoeting met Ashwin Adhin

    Op ‘jacht’ naar een ontmoeting met Ashwin Adhin

    It was early May when a promotional video popped up on my Facebook feed, leading with a portrait of Ashwin Adhin, Speaker of the National Assembly of Suriname, captioned “Suriname Man on a Mission”. The video invited me to a networking evening billed as “A Night of Connection” with Adhin, scheduled for the evening of Thursday, April 30 in Wateringen, a small town west of The Hague between Rijswijk and Naaldwijk. Local organizers Sunil Kowlesar and Hugo Sital, reported to be acquaintances of Adhin, promised attendees light snacks and drinks.

    Wateringen is not exactly known as a hub for Surinamese community events, so I looked up the venue online and was surprised to find it was a small local casual eatery called Warung Chit-Ra. It struck me as an odd choice to host a formal meeting with the sitting speaker of a foreign parliament. It seemed organizers caught wind of the confusion around the original venue, because a few days later I received the same promotional clip updated with a new location: WestCord Hotel Delft, on the same date, still free entry with complimentary food and drinks, plus a WhatsApp contact for registration.

    I seriously considered signing up. I had never met Adhin in person, and I was eager to hear his perspective on the role of the Surinamese diaspora in the Netherlands in supporting ongoing development in Suriname. Around the same time, I saw a separate announcement on LinkedIn from the Diaspora Instituut Nederland (DIN) for another meeting with Adhin, scheduled for the afternoon of Sunday May 3 at the Van der Valk Hotel near Schiphol Airport. Having never attended a DIN event before, I registered for this one instead, paying a 15-euro contribution to cover venue rental costs. This way, I figured I would get my chance to meet Adhin one way or another.

    That weekend was already shaping up to be packed: I had also received a personal invitation to the inaugural Jules Wijdenbosch Lecture, organized by diaspora group Collectief Overzee Surinamers, in Amsterdam-Zuidoost on the afternoon of Saturday May 2.

    But just as I prepared for the weekend, everything began to unravel. First, I got a message canceling the April 30 Adhin event at WestCord Hotel Delft. Then, on the morning of May 2, Surinamese outlet Starnieuws published a story in which Adhin flatly denied any involvement with the DIN event scheduled for Sunday. Notably, he made no comment at all about the canceled Delft gathering.

    Adhin told Starnieuws that with his official approval, the Surinamese ambassador to the Netherlands would host an official networking reception for diaspora organizations, entrepreneurs and professionals Sunday evening May 3 in Amsterdam. The invitation was even published alongside the Starnieuws story, open to all interested attendees. The announcement sparked heated discussion across Dutch social media. But DIN issued its own statement shortly after, confirming the Sunday afternoon event would go forward as planned regardless. By this point, Adhin had become something of an unexpected fixation for me, a constant presence in my planning for days. I found myself debating whether to rearrange my plans to attend the Amsterdam evening event.

    Then, in what was a complete surprise, as I waited for the inaugural Jules Wijdenbosch Lecture to start in Amsterdam-Zuidoost that Saturday afternoon, Adhin himself walked into the venue alongside his wife. Attendees were asked to wait a moment for the Surinamese ambassador, who was en route to the event.

    I was sitting just four rows behind Adhin, so I took the chance to introduce myself. He stood, we shook hands, I shared my name and told him it was an honor to meet him, and we chatted for a few minutes while we waited for the ambassador. It turned out Adhin had to leave early to attend a wedding in Rotterdam, which was the whole reason for his short visit to the Netherlands. I left that chance encounter delighted to have met the figure that had occupied my planning for days.

    When I arrived at the well-attended DIN event the next afternoon, I was naturally curious about how organizers would explain Adhin’s absence. All DIN chair John Brewster shared in his opening remarks was that he had received a message — which I assumed came from the Surinamese embassy — stating Adhin could not attend due to unspecified security risks. Those seeking more details were invited to ask Brewster privately after the event concluded.

    By this point, I had already drawn my own conclusion. No meeting with visiting Surinamese ministers or parliament members, particularly those affiliated with the National Democratic Party (NDP), can go forward without the explicit approval of the Surinamese ambassador in The Hague. It is important to note that Ambassador Panka is no stranger to political organization: he previously served as the NDP’s official spokesperson, and led the party’s own Information & Propaganda Institute.

    After the DIN event wrapped, I briefly considered heading to Amsterdam to attend the official evening reception and hear Adhin speak after all. But I had not registered in advance, and it seemed likely security would turn me away at the door, so I decided to head home instead.

    Late that Sunday night, as I scrolled through Facebook before bed, I came across a photo from the Rotterdam wedding Adhin had left the Amsterdam lecture to attend. He was dressed in a celebratory, tailored three-piece burgundy suit, so well-fitted and formal that for a moment I thought he was the groom. As I went to sleep with that image in my mind, I could not help but note one clear contradiction: there had been no mention of security risks at that wedding.

    This firsthand account of the chaotic sequence of events around Adhin’s short visit to the Netherlands offers a clear look at how diaspora engagement with Suriname’s ruling party works through official channels, and the frictions that arise when independent groups try to organize their own engagements.